Next Article in Journal
Isoprenoid Derivatives of Lysophosphatidylcholines Enhance Insulin and GLP-1 Secretion through Lipid-Binding GPCRs
Next Article in Special Issue
Essential Oil-Based Bioherbicides: Human Health Risks Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Fine-Tuning Phylogenetic Alignment and Haplogrouping of mtDNA Sequences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Trace Elements on Neurodegenerative Diseases of The Eye—The Glaucoma Model
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Current Perspectives on the Physiological Activities of Fermented Soybean-Derived Cheonggukjang

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(11), 5746; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115746
by Il-Sup Kim 1, Cher-Won Hwang 2,*, Woong-Suk Yang 3,* and Cheorl-Ho Kim 4,5,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(11), 5746; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115746
Submission received: 27 April 2021 / Revised: 23 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published: 27 May 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors reported the physiological activities of CGJ and its potential merit as a functional food.

I recommend some revision before accept.

First, they reported blood pressure-lowering, anti-diabetic effect, Anti-osteoporotic effect of CGJ only in animal model. They should suggest these effect in human studies. If they have no studies, please show these effect in soy beans.

Second, they should suggest the recommended quantity of CGJ for improvement of metabolic disease et al.

Author Response

Point-by-point responses to reviewers’ comments

Open Review 1

(x) I would not like to sign my review report
( ) I would like to sign my review report

English language and style

( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) Moderate English changes required
( ) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
(x) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style

Response: The manuscript was reedited by two native speakers of Editage (https://www.editage.co.kr/; Code No. ILKM_46_4). Please confirm the attached document for the certificate of editing (see page 4).

 

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors reported the physiological activities of CGJ and its potential merit as a functional food.

I recommend some revision before accept.

First, they reported blood pressure-lowering, anti-diabetic effect, anti-osteoporotic effect of CGJ only in animal model. They should suggest these effects in human studies. If they have no studies, please show these effects in soybeans.

Response: This review was written based on the total of 85 articles (see page 5–12) reported in PubMed regarding cheonggukjang (CGJ). All results are summarized from Table 1 to Table 11. There are currently no relevant reports on blood pressure-lowering, anti-diabetic, or anti-osteoporotic effects of CGJ in human. The health benefits of CGJ are reported to be associated with thrombotic, anti-cancer, antioxidant, neuroprotective, and anti-microbial effects, as well as skim improvement. As noted in the manuscript, most research has been performed on mice and rats, with some exceptions.

 Research date: May 19, 2021.

 

Second, they should suggest the recommended quantity of CGJ for improvement of metabolic disease et al.

Response: As mentioned above, there are currently no relevant reports on the improvement of metabolic disease. However, I believe that many diseases mentioned in the manuscript, including diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and cognitive functional disorders, are associated with metabolic diseases.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

My congratulations to authors for this review article. It is a complete study regarding the literature in the field of the studied fermented product.

My recommendation is to couple the sections 4 and 5 in only one and do not use the figure 13 and comments about figure in this section. These could be moved of the other sections above mentioned.

Author Response

Open Review 2

(x) I would not like to sign my review report
( ) I would like to sign my review report

English language and style

( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
( ) Moderate English changes required
( ) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
(x) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style

Response: The manuscript was reedited by two native speakers of Editage (https://www.editage.co.kr/; Code No. ILKM_46_4). Please confirm the attached document for the certificate of editing (see page 4).

 

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

My congratulations to authors for this review article. It is a complete study regarding the literature in the field of the studied fermented product.

My recommendation is to couple the sections 4 and 5 in only one and do not use the figure 13 and comments about figure in this section. These could be moved of the other sections above mentioned.

Response: As recommended, sections 4 and 5 have been merged. Figure 13 has been moved to section 3.10. manuscript and used for the graphical abstract.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

No comments

Back to TopTop