Skip to Content
  • Review
  • Open Access

7 September 2020

Usefulness of Brain Positron Emission Tomography with Different Tracers in the Evaluation of Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalous

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
2
Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
3
Academic Education, Research and Innovation Area, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
4
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland

Abstract

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is the only form of dementia that can be cured by surgery. Its diagnosis relies on clinical and radiological criteria. Identifying patients who can benefit from surgery is challenging, as other neurological diseases can be concomitant or mimic iNPH. We performed a systematic review on the role of positron emission tomography (PET) in iNPH. We retrieved 35 papers evaluating four main functional aspects with different PET radiotracers: (1) PET with amyloid tracers, revealing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology in 20–57% of suspected iNPH patients, could be useful in predictions of surgical outcome. (2) PET with radiolabeled water as perfusion tracer showed a global decreased cerebral blood flow (CBF) and regional reduction of CBF in basal ganglia in iNPH; preoperative perfusion parameters could predict surgical outcome. (3) PET with 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoroglucose ([18F]FDG ) showed a global reduction of glucose metabolism without a specific cortical pattern and a hypometabolism in basal ganglia; [18F]FDG PET may identify a coexisting neurodegenerative disease, helping in patient selection for surgery; postsurgery increase in glucose metabolism was associated with clinical improvement. (4) Dopaminergic PET imaging showed a postsynaptic D2 receptor reduction and striatal upregulation of D2 receptor after treatment, associated with clinical improvement. Overall, PET imaging could be a useful tool in iNPH diagnoses and treatment response.

1. Introduction

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a chronic condition among adults which is characterized by the clinical triad of gait disturbances, memory deficits and urinary incontinence, as well as radiological evidence of ventriculomegaly with disproportionally effaced superior frontal sulci and reduced callosal angle [1]. Despite the fact that it is known that NPH can be secondary to traumatic brain injuries, intracranial hemorrhages and infections, the majority of cases are idiopathic (iNPH), and their pathophysiology remaining puzzling. Since its recognition, NPH has been regarded as a form of dementia which is curable with surgery, namely through a ventriculo-peritoneal or ventriculo-atrial shunt. However, the selection of patients that will benefit from surgery remains difficult, with up to 40% of patients failing to respond [2].
Several adjuvant invasive tests have therefore been developed to predict shunt response, such as prolonged intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) subtraction tests (tap test, prolonged lumbar drainage), and infusion tests to study the CSF hydrodynamics (lumbar or ventricular Katzman test) [3,4,5,6,7]. Nonetheless, none of the above methods can fully predict shunt response. This may be due to the comorbidities burden of iNPH patients, including the concomitance of other neurodegenerative diseases [8]. Indeed, concomitant, biopsy proven hallmarks of AD have been reported in up to 68% of iNPH patients, and might negatively influence shunt-response [9]. Moreover, Parkinson-like, extrapyramidal motor disorders related to dopaminergic system dysfunction are also frequently reported in these patients [10,11]. Lastly, evidence has shown that iNPH is not simply the result of impaired CSF circulation, but that it has a complex pathogenesis involving brain vascular autoregulation deficits and decreased cerebral metabolism [12,13].
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive functional imaging technique which is routinely used in clinical practice in the evaluation of patients affected by neurodegenerative diseases, including dementias and parkinsonian syndromes. With a portfolio of several radiotracers which are capable of assessing different cerebral metabolic functions or brain protein depositions, PET has been used in NPH patients to determine several cerebral functions: (1) the amyloid burden with different radiotracers i.e., 2-(4′-[11C]Methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole or [11C]Pittsburgh Compound B ([11C]PiB), 4-[(E)-2-[4-[2-[2-(2[18F]fluoranylethoxy)ethoxy]ethoxy]phenyl]ethenyl]-N-methylaniline ([18F]Florbetaben), and 2-[3-[18F]fluoranyl-4-(methylamino)phenyl]-1,3-benzothiazol-6-ol ([18F]Flutemetamol); (2) the cerebral perfusion with [15O]H2O; (3) the glucose metabolism with [18F]FDG; (4) and the integrity of the dopaminergic system with 3,5-dichloro-N-[[(2S)-1-ethylpyrrolidin-2-yl]methyl]-2-hydroxy-6-(11C)methoxybenzamide ([11C]Raclopride) and 11C-labelled 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane ([11C]CFT).
The aim of this systematic review is to assess the role of PET imaging with different radiotracers in iNPH patients according to published literature.

2. Results

A comprehensive literature search revealed 169 articles. Following the revision of both the title and the abstract, 133 article were excluded: 100 for not being within the field of interest of this review, 27 for being editorials or reviews, 6 for being case reports, and 1 for being a conference abstract reporting the same data as a separate, full-text manuscript. The full-text of the remaining articles was reviewed, and no additional study was included after screening the references. Finally, 35 articles comprising 674 patients were included in this systematic review (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Flow chart of the search for the systemic review on the usefulness of brain positron emission tomography (PET) with different tracers in patients with iNPH patients.
The selected articles are categorized according to the protein deposition or cerebral function assessed by the different PET radiotracers utilized in the studies: (1) amyloid imaging; (2) perfusion imaging; (3) glucose metabolism imaging; or (4) dopaminergic imaging. The characteristics of all included articles are shown in Tables, according to the four main groups of studies.

2.1. Amyloid PET Imaging in iNPH

2.1.1. Correlation between Radiotracer Uptake and Biopsy Samples in iNPH

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, amyloid PET imaging with [11C]PiB, and later with fluorinate radiopharmaceuticals (e.g., [18F]Florbetaben and [18F]Flutemetamol), represented a promising tool for noninvasive and in vivo evaluation of brain amyloid deposition in patients with suspected AD [14]. iNPH patients represented an ideal population to demonstrate the significant correlation between the amyloid PET uptake and AD-related lesion (Aβ aggregates) deposition upon histopathological examination. Indeed, iNPH patients have cognitive impairment and the AD is the most important type of dementia in differential diagnoses; furthermore, a notable percentage of patients with symptoms suggestive of NPH had histologically-proven AD-related pathological lesions [9]; finally, a cortical biopsy specimen can be made in these patients through the burr hole of ICP monitoring, a low-risk surgical procedure routinely performed in clinical practice that increases the diagnostic accuracy of iNPH.
Beside of a significant correlation between [11C]PiB PET findings and biopsy-proven AD-related lesions (Aβ aggregates), Leinonen et al. found 4/7 (57%) iNHP patients with concomitant Aβ-aggregates at biopsy and with [11C]PiB uptake at PET images [15]. Later, the same researchers performed a double-tracer PET imaging study with [11C]PiB and 1-[18F]fluoranyl-3-[2-[4-(methylamino)phenyl]quinolin-6-yl]oxypropan-2-ol (S-[18F]-THK-5117), a tau-specific ligand, aiming to investigate the relationship between PET and protein deposition (tau and amyloid) at biopsy in 14 iNPH patients. At biopsy, 50% patients had Aβ aggregates, 14% had both Aβ and p-tau lesions and 7% had p-tau lesions. Although a correlation between [11C]PiB PET and Aβ aggregates at biopsy was found, S-[18F]-THK-5117 did not show any statistically significant correlation with biopsy p-tau [16]. However, this tau tracer also binds to the monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) enzyme, which is known to be elevated in basal ganglia and could have led to off-target binding. This could constitute a limitation in the specificity of the study. Further studies with more specific Tau tracers should be conducted. A significant correlation between PET findings and Aβ aggregates at biopsy was also found using [18F]Flutemetamol. In particular, Wolk et al. found Aβ aggregates in 4/7 (57%) iNPH patients, resulting positive at [18F]Flutemetamol PET; a correlation between percentage of Aβ-aggregates and SUVratio (SUVvoi/SUVcerebellum) was also evident [17]. Similarly, Wong et al. found Aβ-aggregates at biopsy and positive [18F]Flutemetamol PET in 2/10 (20%) iNPH patients. The PET visual assessment had 100% in both specificity (Sp) and sensitivity (Se), and a good association between SUVratio and neuropathology was found [18]. Also Rinne et al. evaluated [18F]Flutemetamol PET in two series of iNPH patients undergoing biopsy during the shunting procedure. In these papers, they noted that Aβ-aggregates at biopsy were present in 24% and 29% of iNPH patients; the visual assessment had 75–100% in Se and 100% in Sp, and a significant correlation between SUVratio and Aβ-aggregates was found [19,20]. In the second study, the correlation between amyloid deposition and shunt response was also assessed, showing a variable response [20]. Finally, Leinonen et al. published a double-tracer study with [18F]Flutemetamol and [11C]PiB PET: 11 patients with final iNPH diagnosis underwent shunt, of whom two (18%) had Aβ-aggregates at biopsy; a significant association between the SUVratio of the two radiotracers was found (r = 0.97, p = 0.0003), and SUVratio of both radiotracers correlated with Aβ-aggregates at biopsy [21].

2.1.2. Uptake in iNPH before Treatment

Once it had been established that amyloid PET imaging with [11C]PiB and [18F]Flutemetamol yielded similar results and effectively reflected the brain Aβ deposition at biopsy in iNPH patients, the researches’ focus moved to understanding the role of the concomitant AD-pathology, assessed by amyloid PET, in the pathophysiology of iNPH, comparing the PET findings with AD-pathology neurodegenerative disease or healthy control subjects (HC). To this end, Kondo et al. first compared the [11C]PiB uptake of 10 iNPH patients with those of seven AD patients. Three out of ten (30%) iNPH patients, all with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), showed [11C]PiB cortical uptake. The mean cortical SUVratio did not significantly differ between iNPH and AD patients, but a different [11C]PiB distribution was evident (high-convexity parasagittal areas in iNPH vs. frontal and parieto-temporal areas in AD) [22], that could be useful in the differential diagnoses. In 2017, Jiménez-Bonilla et al. visually analyzed the [11C]PiB uptake in 13 iNPH patients before shunt and, for comparison, in seven HC. PET scan was considered positive/equivocal in 5/13 (38%) iNPH patients, and a slight/mild cortical uptake was seen in all HC. Compared to HC, iNPH patients showed an increased cortical [11C]PiB retention and a lower white matter [11C]PiB retention, possible leading to lower contrast images [23]. Kang et al. compared the [18F]Florbetaben PET scan of 17 iNPH patients with 8 HC, showing significant increases in [18F]Florbetaben uptake in the bilateral frontal, parietal, and occipital cortices of iNPH patients compared to HC. In the iNPH group, right frontal [18F]Florbetaben uptake was found to be negatively correlated with right hippocampal volume, suggesting a relationship between frontal cortex [18F]Florbetaben uptake and hippocampal neuronal degeneration [24].

2.1.3. Role in Prediction of Shunt Response in iNPH

Aiming to evaluate the clinical usefulness of amyloid PET imaging in the prediction of response to surgical shunt, Hirahoka et al. [25] performed amyloid PET imaging with 5-[(E)-2-[6-(2-fluoroethoxy)-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl]ethenyl]-N-methyl-N-[11C]methyl-1,3-thiazol-2-amine ([11C]BF-227) in ten iNPH patients before shunt, and, for comparison, in ten AD patients and ten HC. According to the SUVratio values, iNPH patients with high-SUVratio (n = 5) and low-SUVratio (n = 5) did not significantly differ for baseline clinical assessments and clinical improvement after shunt, but a significant inverse correlation between SUVratios and cognitive improvements after shunt was observed. Jang et al. [26] evaluated the prognostic value of [18F]Florbetaben by analyzing the response to the tap test in 31 iNPH patients. Compared to patients with negative PET (n = 24), patients with positive PET (n = 7) showed worse improvement in gait scores after the tap test. Indeed, only 29% of [18F]Florbetaben positive patients were responders to the tap test. On the other hand, the tap test was positive in 83% of [18F]Florbetaben negative patients. [18F]Florbetaben PET was independently associated with the positive tap test response. Among the 14 patients undergoing shunting (responders at tap test and PET-negative), 12 (86%) showed improved symptoms. The authors concluded that [18F]Florbetaben PET scans can help determine which iNPH patients will benefit from shunt surgery by identifying concomitant AD. Rinne et al. [27] recently performed a retrospective [11C]PiB PET study in 21 suspected iNPH patients with ICP monitoring, aiming to compare the [11C]PiB uptake with Aβ and p-tau lesions at biopsy, the lumbar and ventricular CSF Aβ, the response to the shunt (performed in 15/21 patients), and the final clinical diagnosis of AD. Response to the shunt was seen in 13/15 patients, and AD was diagnosed in 8/21 patients during a median follow-up of 6 years. [11C]PiB uptake in the right frontal cortex (p = 0.60, p < 0.01) and the combined neocortical [11C]PiB uptake score (p = 0.61, p < 0.01) were associated with a higher Aβ load in the biopsy. Excluding one (1/15) outlier, [11C]PiB uptake was also associated with the ventricular CSF Aβ (p = −0.58, p = 0.03). The authors concluded that [11C]PiB PET can reliably detect simultaneous amyloid pathology among the iNPH patients; further studies will show whether amyloid PET can predict a clinical response to the shunt operation. In addition, the presence of Aβ pathology in patients with iNPH might also warrant treatment with current AD drugs.
Table 1 summarizes amyloid PET imaging findings.
Table 1. Amyloid PET imaging in NPH patients.

2.2. Perfusion PET Imaging in iNPH

Despite the rapid evolution of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) perfusion techniques and the wide availability of perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), PET perfusion imaging with radiolabeled water is still considered the gold standard in the cerebral perfusion evaluation with imaging. Indeed, PET is the only technique which is intrinsically able to quantify, as absolute values (i.e., mL/min/gr), several perfusion parameters, such as cerebral oxygen utilization (rCMRO2), global and regional cerebral blood flow (CBF), blood volume (CBV), and oxygen extraction rate (OER).

2.2.1. Perfusion Changes before Treatment in iNPH

In 2004, Owler et al. [28] measured the regional CBF with [15O]H2O PET coregistered with MRI in 17 NPH patients (12 idiopathic), and for comparison, in 12 HC. Mean CBF was significantly decreased in the cerebrum and cerebellum of iNPH patients compared to HC. Secondary NPH (posttraumatic or postinfective) also showed lower CBF in both cerebrum and cerebellum compared to HC, but these differences were not statistically significant. A regional analysis demonstrated that CBF was reduced in the basal ganglia and the thalamus, but not in white matter regions. In 2007, Miyamoto et al. [29] determined the CMRO2 and the CBF in patients with iNPH vs. HC at baseline in nine iNPH patients. CBF tended to decrease in frontal lobe and basal ganglia, whereas CMRO2 was increased in the frontal lobe and reduced in basal ganglia compared to 10 HC; regional CBV and OER showed no differences between iNPH and HC. The authors concluded that a reduction of oxygen metabolism in the basal ganglia might be one of the factors causing symptoms in iNPH; no particular pattern of oxygen metabolism in iNPH was evident in this study.

2.2.2. Perfusion Changes during Infusion Test in iNPH

In 2004, Owler et al. [30] also showed how global and regional CBF (basal ganglia, thalamus, periventricular white matter) was further reduced at increased ICP values during a ventricular infusion test. Likewise, Momjian et al. [31] investigated the distribution of the regional peri- and para-ventricular white matter CBF using [15O]H2O PET coregistered with MRI in 12 iNPH patients at baseline (vs. 10 HC) and during the infusion test. At baseline, global CBF in iNPH was lower than in HC (28.4 vs. 33 mL/100 mL/min), with a progressive increase of white matter CBF at increasing distance from ventricles. The ventricular infusion test produced a reduction in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and a significant decrease of the global CBF. The profile of the percentage changes in regional white matter CBF in iNPH patients showed a U-shaped relationship with distance from the ventricles, with a maximal decrease at a mean distance of 9 mm from the lateral ventricle wall, thus favoring corona radiata watershed territories strokes which are commonly seen in iNPH patients. These studies seem to confirm a defect in cerebral autoregulation underling the pathophysiological mechanism in iNPH during sleep-associated increased ICP [30,31].

2.2.3. Perfusion Changes after Shunt Placement in iNPH

In 1986, Brooks and collaborators [32] measured the rCMRO2, rOER, rCBF, and the rCBV using PET with inhalation of tracer amounts of [15O]CO2, [15O]O2, and [11C]CO in 14 hydrocephalic patients (7 acute, 4 congenital, 3 iNPH) before and after surgical decompression, and in 20 HC. At baseline, all patients had a significantly reduced level of mean rCMRO2 and rCBF compared with HC, but acute hydrocephalus (AH) patients had elevated levels of rOER. After decompression, AH patients increased the rCBF, whereas chronic hydrocephalus (CH), including iNPH, showed no improvement in any perfusion parameter after shunt. Between 1998 and 2008, Klinge and collaborators published several studies aiming to investigate the cerebral perfusion measured with [15O]H2O PET before and after shunt in CH patients. The aim of their first study was to investigate whether the global and regional CBF was a reliable indicator for selecting patients for shunting, performing baseline and postshunt PET in 21 CH patients (18 iNPH). All the patients also underwent preoperative prolonged ICP monitoring and CSF infusion tests; only preoperative global CBF correlated with clinical outcome, as only patients with low global CBF clinically improved. ICP monitoring and resistance to CSF outflow did not correlate with outcome. Therefore, preoperative CBF may be helpful in predicting clinical outcome after shunting [33]. Subsequently, the same research group performed a similar study in 10 iNPH patients and, for comparison, in 10 HC. Besides the global CBF, the authors also investigated the cerebrovascular reserve (CVR) as the relative difference in the CBF between baseline and after vasodilatation with acetazolamide. At baseline, global CBF was significantly reduced in iNPH compared with HC, and CBF was significantly lower in shunt responders than in nonresponders; the baseline CVR was not significantly different between shunt responders and nonresponders. One week after shunting, the CVR significantly increased in responders and significantly decreased in nonresponders compared to respective baselines. At 7 months, both outcome groups showed an increase of CVR, with nonresponders returning to baseline values. A reduced baseline CBF before surgery did not indicate a poor prognosis, and baseline CBF and CVR were not predictive of clinical outcome. However, a decrease in the CVR soon after shunt placement was related to poor late clinical outcome [34]. Later, the same authors investigated the impact of cerebrovascular risk factors on perfusion parameters in 53 iNPH patients undergoing shunt placement (57% at low-risk). In high-risk patients, CVR at baseline was marginal in both outcome groups (~30%), but significantly increased in responders (64 vs. 31%) after shunt. In low-risk patients, CVR was lower in responders than in nonresponders (36 vs. 47%) at baseline, and deteriorated in nonresponders (29 vs. 47%) after shunt [35]. In 2002, the same research group also published three more studies that confirmed that at baseline, shunt responders had lower CBF but similar CVR to shunt nonresponders [33], being regional CBF and CVR reduced particularly in frontobasal cortex in responders [36]. After shunting, responders showed increased CVR [33], which was associated with both gait and cognitive improvement at 1 week and 7 months, respectively [37]. Lastly, in 2008, Kingle et al. [38] published a retrospective study questioning whether the functional status before and after shunt treatment might correlate with regional perfusion in 65 iNPH patients. At baseline, worse clinical status had significant correlation with a reduced tracer uptake in mesial frontal and anterior temporal areas. Comparison of mean global uptake before and after shunting did not reveal significant differences between shunt responders and nonresponders. In the mesial frontal areas, tracer uptake showed significant reciprocal changes in responders vs. nonresponders. Therefore, regional CBF alterations seem relevant to the NPH syndrome and to posttreatment functional changes. Also Miyamoto et al. [39] investigated the changes in CMRO2 with [15O]H2O PET before and after shunt; postshunt regional CMRO2 and OER was increased in good responders (n = 5), whereas the postshunt regional OER was reduced in poor responders (n = 3). The authors concluded that the improvement of regional CMRO2 correlated with the response to shunt, and that changes in regional OER might predict poor response to shunt.
Table 2 summarizes perfusion PET imaging findings.
Table 2. Perfusion PET imaging in NPH patients.

2.3. Glucose Metabolism PET Imaging in iNPH

Normal pressure hydrocephalus is a potentially treatable form of dementia with an unpredictable outcome after shunt surgery. Since the middle of the 1980s, researchers have been evaluating cerebral glucose metabolism with [18F]FDG PET at baseline and after shunt, aiming to assess whether functional changes are able to predict response to shunt and the clinical outcome, thereby allowing them to better identify patients who would benefit from surgical procedures. Dynamic PET acquisition and quantitative assessment of metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglu, mL/min/100cc) was principally investigated, along with semiquantitative assessment.

2.3.1. Metabolic Changes at Baseline in iNPH

The cerebral glucose metabolism evaluated with dynamic [18F]FDG PET was firstly investigated on 1985 by Jagust et al. [41], aiming to differentiate three NPH patients from 17 AD patients and seven HC. PET was performed only before treatment. All NPH patients improved after shunting. AD patients showed a typical temporoparietal hypometabolic pattern, while NPH showed a regular distribution of cortical uptake. However, a definite depression of CMRglu (mL/min/100cc) was found in all brain regions in NPH patients, and in temporoparietal cortex in AD. In 1995, Tedeschi et al. [42] measured rCMRglu in 18 iNPH submitted to shunt and frontal cortex biopsy. When compared with 11 HC, iNPH patients showed a significant rCMRglu reduction in all cortical and subcortical regions at baseline PET, with a large topographical heterogeneity (even after exclusion of six patients with AD-changes or cerebrovascular disease at biopsy). After shunt, only 33% patients improved (two with AD-changes and two with cerebrovascular changes in the biopsy sample), and the metabolic pattern did not differ between responders and nonresponders. These metabolic and histopathological heterogeneities may account for the high variability in the success rate of shunt surgery series.
In 2018, Townley et al. [43] evaluated semiquantitatively, with a voxel based statistical analysis, [18F]FDG PET scans in seven iNPH patients aiming to differentiate iNPH from 21 AD patients, 14 dementia with Lewy body/Parkinson disease dementia (DLB/PDD) patients, and seven behavioral fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD) patients. When compared to HC and other pathologies, iNPH had significant regional hypometabolism in the dorsal striatum, involving the caudate and putamen bilaterally (even after partial volume correction), with preserved neocortical metabolism. This metabolic pattern may differentiate iNPH from degenerative diseases, and has the potential to serve as a biomarker for iNPH in future studies.
Finally, Miyazaki and collaborators [44] focused on the changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolism using [18F]FDG PET in a large population of prodromal iNPH patients. The authors distinguished among three groups of patients, according to the clinical and CT morphological findings, in order of NPH stages: (1) preclinical morphologic features of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus (PMD; n = 33); (2) asymptomatic ventriculomegaly with features of iNPH on MR (AVIM; n = 32); (3) iNPH (n = 12). Each group was compared with HC (n = 89). Measuring the median regional SUVratio in five regions (frontal lobes, temporal lobes, medial parietal lobes, striata, and thalami), the authors found that, compared to HC, the SUVratio was significantly lower in PMD, AVIM, and iNPH in the frontal and temporal lobes; it was significantly higher in PMD and AVIM in the medial parietal lobes; and it was significantly lower in the iNPH in the thalami and striata. Therefore, changes in brain glucose metabolism were mainly neocortical in the preclinical stage of iNPH, while metabolic decline in the basal ganglia was only detected in clinical iNPH.

2.3.2. Metabolic Changes after Treatment in iNPH

In 1986, George et al. [45] studied five hydrocephalic patients (2 AH, 3 CH) with 11C-2-deoxyglucose or [18F]FDG PET before and after shunt. Despite a clinical improvement in all patients after shunting, the CMRglu increased in AH but decreased in CH. Calcagni and collaborators published two studies in 2011 and 2013 performing dynamic [18F]FDG PET in patients with iNPH before and after shunt [46,47]. In the first study, the authors evaluated the relationship between global CMRglu and clinical/neuropsychological assessment 3 days before and 1 week after shunt placement in 11 iNPH patients [46]. After shunting, the global CMRglu significantly increased (2.95 ± 0.44 vs. 4.38 ± 0.68, p = 10−7) in all iNPH patients (mean increase percentage of 48.7%), and all iNPH patients clinically improved with a significant correlation between the global CMRglu and clinical/neuropsychological assessment. The authors concluded that changes in the global CMRglu are promptly reversible after surgery, and that there is a relationship between the metabolic changes and clinical symptoms. In the second study, the authors performed a regional evaluation of CMRglu in 20 iNPH patients before and 1 week after shunt placement, and correlated the individual CMRglu variations with the clinical scale score assessment after shunting [47]. Baseline and postshunt regional CMRglu values were similar in right and left brain regions. After shunting, 17 patients (85%) improved both clinically (all scores decreased) and metabolically (CMRglu significantly increased in all regions), in contrast to the remaining patients that remained clinically stable but showed an increased CMRglu only in left frontal lobe, left putamen and right thalamus. However, no difference in global CMRglu at baseline was found between the two clinical outcome groups. Despite there was no correlation between clinical scales and pre- and post- operative CMRglu values, the study showed a significant inverse correlation between clinical assessment and the percentage of CMRglu variation. The authors concluded that iNPH is a global brain disease involving all cerebral regions in the same way, and that shunting also has a global effect on cerebral metabolism. Furthermore, individual variations of CMRglu were more important than absolute values, and were correlated with clinical status after shunting.
Table 3 summarizes glucose metabolism PET imaging findings.
Table 3. Glucose metabolism PET imaging in NPH patients.

2.4. Dopaminergic PET Imaging in iNPH

It is well known that gait disturbance is the most frequent among the triad of symptoms of iNPH [48]. However, differentiating iNPH from other neurologic diseases with hypokinetic type of gait disturbance, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with extrapyramidal symptoms, is sometimes a great challenge [49]. Only one research group has evaluated the dopaminergic function in iNPH with PET radiotracers. In the first study, Ouchi and collaborators [50] investigated the dopaminergic contribution to the pathophysiology of iNPH by performing a double-radiotracer study with [11C]CFT, a presynaptic marker binding to dopamine transporter, and [11C]Raclopride, a postsynaptic marker binding to D2 receptor, in eight iNPH patients and eight HC. They found a significant reduction in [11C]Raclopride binding in the putamen and nucleus accumbens and unchanged striatal [11C]CFT binding in iNPH. The dorsal putamen [11C]Raclopride binding correlated negatively with gait severity, whereas the nucleus accumbens [11C]Raclopride binding correlated positively with the emotional recognition score in the iNPH group. To summarize, iNPH shows preserved presynaptic activity in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system, but a postsynaptic D2 receptor reduction. This postsynaptic D2 receptor hypoactivity in the dorsal putamen is associated with the severity of gait impairment in iNPH.
In 2007, the same study group investigated the plasticity of the striatum D2 receptor evaluating the difference of the [11C]Raclopride binding potential (BP) in eight iNPH patients before and 1 month after shunt [51]. After shunt, iNPH clinically improved, and the [11C]Raclopride BP increased in the nucleus accumbens and dorsal putamen; furthermore, the [11C]Raclopride BP increased in the striatum as a whole, correlating significantly with improved general cognitive ability. The authors concluded that striatal upregulation of D2 receptor after shunt is associated with amelioration of hypokinetic gait disturbance and anhedonic mentation in iNPH patients, indicating that the effect of VP shunting may reside in noninhibition of functionally suppressed D2 receptor in the striatum.
Table 4 summarizes the dopaminergic PET imaging findings.
Table 4. Dopaminergic PET imaging in NPH patients.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Search Strategy

A comprehensive computer literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Scopus databases was conducted in order to find relevant published articles on the role of PET and PET/CT in NPH. We used a search algorithm based on a combination of the following terms: (a) “Normal pressure hydrocephalus” or “NPH” and (b) “positron emission tomography” or “PET”. No beginning date limit was used; the search was updated until 30 May 2020. To expand our search, references of the retrieved articles were also screened for additional studies.

3.2. Study Selection

Studies investigating the role of PET and PET/CT in patients with iNPH were eligible for inclusion. Review articles or editorials, articles not in the field of interest of this review, case reports and preclinical studies were excluded. Only studies including PET or PET/CT performed in at least 3 iNPH patients were included. Two researchers (M.V.M. and G.T.) independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles, applying the above inclusion and exclusion criteria.

3.3. Data Abstraction

For each included study, we collected: the basic details of study (authors and year of publication); patient characteristics (number, gender and mean age); technical aspects of PET imaging (kind of radiopharmaceutical, kind of analysis, parameters evaluated, and PET timing); and neurosurgical aspects (kind of hydrocephalous and surgical procedure performed). Finally, the primary endpoint and the main findings of all articles included in this review are shown in the Results section.
Studies reporting data not only on iNPH but also from other forms of hydrocephalus (e.g., secondary NPH, longstanding overt hydrocephalus, obstructive NPH, etc.) were not excluded, but only results about iNPH patients were included in the present study.

4. Summary

To summarize the information provided in the retrieved articles concerning PET imaging in iNPH patients:
  • PET with amyloid tracers, revealing AD in 20–57% of suspected iNPH patients, could be useful in prediction of surgical outcome;
  • PET with perfusion tracers showed a global decreased CBF and regional reduction of CBF in basal ganglia in iNPH patients; preoperative perfusion parameters could predict surgical outcome;
  • PET with [18F]FDG showed a global reduction of glucose metabolism without a specific cortical pattern and a hypometabolism in basal ganglia in iNPH patients; [18F]FDG PET may identify a coexisting neurodegenerative disease, helping in the patient selection for surgery; postsurgery increase in glucose metabolism was associated with clinical improvement.
  • Dopaminergic PET imaging showed a postsynaptic D2 receptor reduction and a striatal upregulation of D2 receptors after treatment, associated with clinical improvement.

5. Limitations

The main limitations of our study are related to the heterogeneity of the retrieved studies, in particular, with respect to number of patients, PET evaluation techniques and timing of the imaging. Indeed, the heterogeneity of the timing of perfusion or glucose metabolism PET, performed either before or after the surgical procedure, could affect the prognostic value of PET imaging. However, the aim of these studies was different, as preoperative only PET studies aimed to detect the static picture of the disease and possible markers of response to shunt, while pre- and post- op PET studies aimed to increase knowledge on treatment-induced changes and to detect dynamic changes which could predict longer-term outcome.
Moreover, prevalence of beta amyloid deposit burden could be limited by heterogeneous brain tissue sampling (frontal/parietal) and by the reduced amount of tissue sampled in the setting of ventricular catheter placement. However, the aim of some included papers was to validate beta amyloid tracers using biopsy samples as a reference standard, while the aim of others was to assess whether the presence/absence of these deposits was associated with outcome after shunting.
Finally, a common limitation of the retrieved studies was the poor focus on possible differences in neuropsychological assessments of patients included in the study. This limits the possibility to evaluate whether a basal difference in cognitive impairment exists between iNPH patients with and without concomitant beta amyloid deposits, and to fully assess the outcome after treatment in these patients.

6. Future Perspectives

Currently, the diagnostic and prognostic value of PET imaging with different tracers in iNPH patients seems promising, but these methods are not part of the routine selection procedures for shunt surgery in iNPH. Furthermore, current guidelines for the diagnosis of iNPH and 2020 ACR appropriateness criteria do not recommend PET imaging for iNPH evaluation [52,53]. Nevertheless, as reported in our review, recent studies have shown a promising role of PET with [18F]FDG and amyloid tracers for the evaluation of iNPH patients [54]. These findings should be confirmed by more large-scale prospective studies to support the role of these imaging methods in the management of iNPH patients. Moreover, studies with a combination of beta amyloid and glucose metabolism imaging could be useful in evaluations of concomitant AD in iNPH and to improve assessments of expected outcomes of surgical treatment.

7. Conclusions

Positron emission tomography is a molecular imaging technique which is able to provide functional information regarding perfusion, glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition in patients with iNPH. The value of this technique is its unique, intrinsic ability to provide absolute quantification of functional parameters, such as perfusion or metabolism, measured in mL/min/cc. PET radiotracers can show metabolic and functional changes that occur in spite of the morphological ones, giving earlier and prodromal information. PET with different tracers seems to be useful to understand the pathophysiology of iNPH in order to improve the selection of patients for surgery, determining the optimal timing for therapeutic intervention, and potentially making it possible to predict the expected outcome, both in terms of global iNPH symptoms and in specific iNPH domains such as cognitive impairment and gait deficits. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to validate these findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V.M. and G.T. (Gianluca Trevisi); methodology, G.T. (Giorgio Treglia) and G.T. (Gianluca Trevisi); validation, M.L.C., C.A., A.M., G.T. (Giorgio Treglia); resources, M.V.M.; data curation, G.T. (Giorgio Treglia); writing—original draft preparation, M.V.M. and G.T. (Gianluca Trevisi); writing—review and editing, M.L.C., C.A., A.M., G.T. (Giorgio Treglia); supervision, G.T. (Gianluca Trevisi). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andersson, J.; Rosell, M.; Kockum, K.; Söderström, L.; Laurell, K. Challenges in diagnosing normal pressure hydrocephalus: Evaluation of the diagnostic guidelines. eNeurologicalSci 2017, 7, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Giordan, E.; Palandri, G.; Lanzino, G.; Murad, M.H.; Elder, B.D. Outcomes and complications of different surgical treatments for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurosurg. 2019, 131, 1024–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anile, C.; De Bonis, P.; Albanese, A.; Di Chirico, A.; Mangiola, A.; Petrella, G.; Santini, P. Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: A single-institution experience. J. Neurosurg. 2010, 113, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Eide, P.K. The correlation between pulsatile intracranial pressure and indices of intracranial pressure-volume reserve capacity: Results from ventricular infusion testing. J. Neurosurg. 2016, 125, 1493–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Katzman, R.; Hussey, F. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption: I. Rationale and method. Neurology 1970, 20, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hussey, F.; Schanzer, B.; Katzman, R. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption: II. Clinical studies. Neurology 1970, 20, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Raneri, F.; Zella, M.A.S.; Di Cristofori, A.; Zarino, B.; Pluderi, M.; Spagnoli, D. Supplementary Tests in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Single-Center Experience with a Combined Lumbar Infusion Test and Tap Test. World Neurosurg. 2017, 100, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Allali, G.; Laidet, M.; Armand, S.; Assal, F. Brain comorbidities in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018, 25, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Macki, M.; Mahajan, A.; Shatz, R.; Air, E.L.; Novikova, M.; Fakih, M.; Elmenini, J.; Kaur, M.; Bouchard, K.R.; Funk, B.A.; et al. Prevalence of Alternative Diagnoses and Implications for Management in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients. Neurosurgery 2020, nyaa199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Broggi, M.; Redaelli, V.; Tringali, G.; Restelli, F.; Romito, L.; Schiavolin, S.; Tagliavini, F.; Broggi, G. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Parkinsonism: Preliminary Data on Neurosurgical and Neurological Treatment. World Neurosurg. 2016, 90, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bräutigam, K.; Vakis, A.; Tsitsipanis, C. Pathogenesis of idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A review of knowledge. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2019, 61, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lalou, A.D.; Czosnyka, M.; Donnelly, J.; Pickard, J.D.; FMedSci; Nabbanja, E.; Keong, N.C.; Garnett, M.; Czosnyka, Z.H. Cerebral autoregulation, cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance, and outcome following cerebrospinal fluid diversion in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J. Neurosurg. 2018, 130, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Landau, S.M.; Thomas, B.A.; Thurfjell, L.; Schmidt, M.; Margolin, R.; Mintun, M.; Pontecorvo, M.; Baker, S.L.; Jagust, W.J.; the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Amyloid PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease: A comparison of three radiotracers. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2014, 41, 1398–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hamilton, R.; Patel, S.; Lee, E.B.; Jackson, E.M.; Lopinto, J.; Arnold, S.E.; Clark, C.M.; Basil, A.; Shaw, L.M.; Xie, S.X.; et al. Lack of shunt response in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with Alzheimer disease pathology. Ann. Neurol. 2010, 68, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leinonen, V.; Alafuzoff, I.; Aalto, S.; Suotunen, T.; Savolainen, S.; Na, K.; Rinne, J.; Jääskeläinen, J.E.; Soininen, H.; Rinne, J.O. Assessment of β-Amyloid in a Frontal Cortical Brain Biopsy Specimen and by Positron Emission Tomography With Carbon 11–Labeled Pittsburgh Compound B. Arch Neurol 2008, 65, 6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Leinonen, V.; Rauramaa, T.; Johansson, J.; Bottelbergs, A.; Tesseur, I.; van der Ark, P.; Pemberton, D.; Koivisto, A.M.; Jääskeläinen, J.E.; Hiltunen, M.; et al. S-[18F]THK-5117-PET and [11C]PIB-PET Imaging in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in Relation to Confirmed Amyloid-β Plaques and Tau in Brain Biopsies. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2018, 64, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wolk, D.A.; Grachev, I.D.; Buckley, C.; Kazi, H.; Grady, M.S.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Hamilton, R.H.; Sherwin, P.; McLain, R.; Arnold, S.E. Association between in vivo fluorine 18-labeled flutemetamol amyloid positron emission tomography imaging and in vivo cerebral cortical histopathology. Arch. Neurol. 2011, 68, 1398–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wong, D.F.; Moghekar, A.R.; Rigamonti, D.; Brašić, J.R.; Rousset, O.; Willis, W.; Buckley, C.; Smith, A.; Gok, B.; Sherwin, P.; et al. An In Vivo Evaluation of Cerebral Cortical Amyloid with [18F]Flutemetamol Using Positron Emission Tomography Compared with Parietal Biopsy Samples in Living Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2013, 15, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rinne, J.O.; Wong, D.F.; Wolk, D.A.; Leinonen, V.; Arnold, S.E.; Buckley, C.; Smith, A.; McLain, R.; Sherwin, P.F.; Farrar, G.; et al. [18F]Flutemetamol PET imaging and cortical biopsy histopathology for fibrillar amyloid β detection in living subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus: Pooled analysis of four studies. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.) 2012, 124, 833–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rinne, J.O.; Frantzen, J.; Leinonen, V.; Lonnrot, K.; Laakso, A.; Virtanen, K.A.; Solin, O.; Kotkansalo, A.; Koivisto, A.; Sajanti, J.; et al. Prospective Flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography and Histopathology in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurodegener. Dis. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leinonen, V.; Rinne, J.O.; Virtanen, K.A.; Eskola, O.; Rummukainen, J.; Huttunen, J.; von und zu Fraunberg, M.; Nerg, O.; Koivisto, A.M.; Rinne, J.; et al. Positron emission tomography with [18F]flutemetamol and [11C]PiB for in vivo detection of cerebral cortical amyloid in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients. Eur. J. Neurol. 2013, 20, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kondo, M.; Tokuda, T.; Itsukage, M.; Kuriyama, N.; Matsushima, S.; Yamada, K.; Nakanishi, H.; Ishikawa, M.; Nakagawa, M. Distribution of Amyloid Burden Differs between Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuroradiol. J. 2013, 26, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiménez-Bonilla, J.F.; Quirce, R.; de Arcocha-Torres, M.; Martínez-Rodríguez, I.; Martínez-Amador, N.; Sánchez-Juan, P.; Pozueta, A.; Martín-Láez, R.; Banzo, I.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, E. 11C-PIB retention patterns in white and grey cerebral matter in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients. A visual analysis. Rev. Esp. Med. Nucl. E Imagen Mol. 2018, 37, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kang, K.; Yoon, U.; Hong, J.; Jeong, S.Y.; Ko, P.-W.; Lee, S.-W.; Lee, H.-W. Amyloid Deposits and Idiopathic Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus: An 18F-Florbetaben Study. Eur. Neurol. 2018, 79, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hiraoka, K.; Narita, W.; Kikuchi, H.; Baba, T.; Kanno, S.; Iizuka, O.; Tashiro, M.; Furumoto, S.; Okamura, N.; Furukawa, K.; et al. Amyloid deposits and response to shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 356, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jang, H.; Park, S.B.; Kim, Y.; Kim, K.W.; Lee, J.I.; Kim, S.T.; Lee, K.H.; Kang, E.-S.; Choe, Y.S.; Seo, S.W.; et al. Prognostic value of amyloid PET scan in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J. Neurol. 2018, 265, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rinne, J.O.; Suotunen, T.; Rummukainen, J.; Herukka, S.-K.; Nerg, O.; Koivisto, A.M.; Rauramaa, T.; Någren, K.; Hiltunen, M.; Alafuzoff, I.; et al. [11C]PIB PET Is Associated with the Brain Biopsy Amyloid-β Load in Subjects Examined for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. J. Alzheimers Dis. JAD 2019, 67, 1343–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Owler, B.K.; Momjian, S.; Czosnyka, Z.; Czosnyka, M.; Péna, A.; Harris, N.G.; Smielewski, P.; Fryer, T.; Donovan, T.; Coles, J.; et al. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Cerebral Blood Flow: A PET Study of Baseline Values. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 24, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miyamoto, J.; Imahori, Y.; Mineura, K. Cerebral oxygen metabolism in idiopathic-normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol. Res. 2007, 29, 830–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Owler, B.K.; Pena, A.; Momjian, S.; Czosnyka, Z.; Czosnyka, M.; Harris, N.G.; Smielewski, P.; Fryer, T.; Donvan, T.; Carpenter, A.; et al. Changes in Cerebral Blood Flow during Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Manipulation in Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Methodological Study. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 24, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Momjian, S.; Owler, B.K.; Czosnyka, Z.; Czosnyka, M.; Pena, A.; Pickard, J.D. Pattern of white matter regional cerebral blood flow and autoregulation in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 2004, 127, 965–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brooks, D.J.; Beaney, R.P.; Powell, M.; Leenders, K.L.; Crockard, H.A.; Thomas, D.G.T.; Marshall, J.; Jones, T. Studies on cerebral oxygen metabolism, blood flow, and blood volume, in patients with hydrocephalus before and after surgical decompression, using positron emission tomography. Brain 1986, 109, 613–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Klinge, P.; Berding, G.; Brinker, T.; Schuhmann, M.; Weckesser, E.; Knapp, W.H.; Samii, M. The Role of Cerebral Blood Flow and Cerebrovascular Reserve Capacity in the Diagnosis of Chronic Hydrocephalus—A PET-Study on 60 Patients. In Intracranial Pressure and Brain Biochemical Monitoring; Czosnyka, M., Pickard, J.D., Kirkpatrick, P.J., Smielewski, P., Hutchinson, P., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2002; pp. 39–41. ISBN 978-3-7091-7397-8. [Google Scholar]
  34. Klinge, P.M.; Knapp, W.H. A positron emission tomography study of cerebrovascular reserve before and after shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic chronic hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1999, 91, 5. [Google Scholar]
  35. Klinge, P.; Brinker, T.; Brinker, T.; Schuhmann, M.; Knapp, W.H.; Samii, M. PET-Studies in Idiopathic Chronic Hydrocephalus before and after Shunt-Treatment: The Role of Risk Factors for Cerebrovascular Disease (CVD) on Cerebral Hemodynamics. In Intracranial Pressure and Brain Biochemical Monitoring; Czosnyka, M., Pickard, J.D., Kirkpatrick, P.J., Smielewski, P., Hutchinson, P., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2002; pp. 43–45. ISBN 978-3-7091-7397-8. [Google Scholar]
  36. Klinge, P.; Berding, G.; Brinkerl, T.; Weckesser, E.; Knapp, W.H. Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Profiles of Shunt-Responder in Idiopathic Chronic Hydrocephalus—A 15-0-Water PET-Study. In Intracranial Pressure and Brain Biochemical Monitoring; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2002; pp. 47–49. [Google Scholar]
  37. Klinge, P.; Rückert, N.; Schuhmann, M.; Berding, G.; Brinker, T.; Knapp, W.H.; Samii, M. Neuropsychological Sequels to Changes in Global Cerebral Blood Flow and Cerebrovascular Reserve Capacity after Shunt Treatment in Chronic Hydrocephalus—A Quantitative PET-Study. In Intracranial Pressure and Brain Biochemical Monitoring; Czosnyka, M., Pickard, J.D., Kirkpatrick, P.J., Smielewski, P., Hutchinson, P., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2002; pp. 55–57. ISBN 978-3-7091-7397-8. [Google Scholar]
  38. Klinge, P.M.; Brooks, D.J.; Samii, A.; Weckesser, E.; van den Hoff, J.; Fricke, H.; Brinker, T.; Knapp, W.H.; Berding, G. Correlates of local cerebral blood flow (CBF) in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients before and after shunting—A retrospective analysis of [15O]H2O PET-CBF studies in 65 patients. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2008, 110, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miyamoto, J.; Tatsuzawa, K.; Inoue, Y.; Imahori, Y.; Mineura, K. Oxygen metabolism changes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting operation. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2007, 116, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Klinge, P.; Fischer, J.; Brinker, T.; Heissler, H.E.; Burchert, W.; Berding, G.; Knapp, W.H.; Samii, M. PET and CBF Studies of Chronic Hydrocephalus: A Contribution to Surgical Indication and Prognosis. J. Neuroimaging 1998, 8, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jagust, W.J.; Friedland, R.P.; Budinger, T.F. Positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose differentiates normal pressure hydrocephalus from Alzheimer-type dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1985, 48, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tedeschi, E.; Hasselbalch, S.G.; Waldemar, G.; Juhler, M.; Hogh, P.; Holm, S.; Garde, L.; Knudsen, L.L.; Klinken, L.; Gjerris, F. Heterogeneous cerebral glucose metabolism in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1995, 59, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Townley, R.A.; Botha, H.; Graff-Radford, J.; Boeve, B.F.; Petersen, R.C.; Senjem, M.L.; Knopman, D.S.; Lowe, V.; Jack, C.R.; Jones, D.T. 18 F-FDG PET-CT pattern in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. NeuroImage Clin. 2018, 18, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Miyazaki, K.; Hanaoka, K.; Kaida, H.; Chiba, Y.; Ishii, K. Changes in cerebral glucose metabolism caused by morphologic features of prodromal idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. EJNMMI Res. 2019, 9, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. George, A.E.; de Leon, M.J.; Miller, J.; Klinger, A.; Foo, S.H.; Christman, D.L.; Wolf, A. Positron emission tomography of hydrocephalus. Metabolic effects of shunt procedures. Acta Radiol. Suppl. 1986, 369, 435–439. [Google Scholar]
  46. Calcagni, M.L.; Lavalle, M.; Mangiola, A.; Indovina, L.; Leccisotti, L.; De Bonis, P.; Marra, C.; Pelliccioni, A.; Anile, C.; Giordano, A. Early evaluation of cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglu) with 18F-FDG PET/CT and clinical assessment in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) patients before and after ventricular shunt placement: Preliminary experience. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Calcagni, M.L.; Taralli, S.; Mangiola, A.; Indovina, L.; Lavalle, M.; De Bonis, P.; Anile, C.; Giordano, A. Regional Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose Evaluation and Clinical Assessment in Patients With Idiopathic Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus Before and After Ventricular Shunt Placement: A Prospective Analysis. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2013, 38, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fisher, C.M. Hydrocephalus as a cause of disturbances of gait in the elderly. Neurology 1982, 32, 1358–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Morel, E.; Armand, S.; Assal, F.; Allali, G. Is frontal gait a myth in normal pressure hydrocephalus? J. Neurol. Sci. 2019, 402, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ouchi, Y.; Nakayama, T.; Kanno, T.; Yoshikawa, E.; Shinke, T.; Torizuka, T. In Vivo Presynaptic and Postsynaptic Striatal Dopamine Functions in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2007, 27, 803–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nakayama, T.; Ouchi, Y.; Yoshikawa, E.; Sugihara, G.; Torizuka, T.; Tanaka, K. Striatal D2 Receptor Availability After Shunting in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. J. Nucl. Med. 2007, 48, 1981–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Halperin, J.J.; Kurlan, R.; Schwalb, J.M.; Cusimano, M.D.; Gronseth, G.; Gloss, D. Practice guideline: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Response to shunting and predictors of response: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2015, 85, 2063–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Moonis, G.; Subramaniam, R.M.; Trofimova, A.; Burns, J.; Bykowski, J.; Chakraborty, S.; Holloway, K.; Ledbetter, L.N.; Lee, R.K.; Pannell, J.S.; et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dementia. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2020, 17, S100–S112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Graff-Radford, N.R.; Jones, D.T. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Contin. Minneap. Minn. 2019, 25, 165–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.