Next Article in Journal
A Dual Measure of Uncertainty: The Deng Extropy
Next Article in Special Issue
Some Useful Integral Representations for Information-Theoretic Analyses
Previous Article in Journal
A Method to Present and Analyze Ensembles of Information Sources
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Training Neural Network Decoders of Rate Compatible Polar Codes via Transfer Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping

by
Yunus Can Gültekin
1,*,
Tobias Fehenberger
2,
Alex Alvarado
1 and
Frans M. J. Willems
1
1
Signal Processing Systems Group, Information and Communication Theory Lab, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
2
ADVA Optical Networking, 82152 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2020, 22(5), 581; https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050581
Submission received: 16 April 2020 / Revised: 13 May 2020 / Accepted: 19 May 2020 / Published: 21 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory for Communication Systems)

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a systematic comparison of distribution matching (DM) and sphere shaping (SpSh) algorithms for short blocklength probabilistic amplitude shaping. For asymptotically large blocklengths, constant composition distribution matching (CCDM) is known to generate the target capacity-achieving distribution. However, as the blocklength decreases, the resulting rate loss diminishes the efficiency of CCDM. We claim that for such short blocklengths over the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, the objective of shaping should be reformulated as obtaining the most energy-efficient signal space for a given rate (rather than matching distributions). In light of this interpretation, multiset-partition DM (MPDM) and SpSh are reviewed as energy-efficient shaping techniques. Numerical results show that both have smaller rate losses than CCDM. SpSh—whose sole objective is to maximize the energy efficiency—is shown to have the minimum rate loss amongst all, which is particularly apparent for ultra short blocklengths. We provide simulation results of the end-to-end decoding performance showing that up to 1 dB improvement in power efficiency over uniform signaling can be obtained with MPDM and SpSh at blocklengths around 200. Finally, we present a discussion on the complexity of these algorithms from the perspectives of latency, storage and computations.
Keywords: shaping gap; constellation shaping; probabilistic amplitude shaping; distribution matching; sphere shaping shaping gap; constellation shaping; probabilistic amplitude shaping; distribution matching; sphere shaping

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gültekin, Y.C.; Fehenberger, T.; Alvarado, A.; Willems, F.M.J. Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping. Entropy 2020, 22, 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050581

AMA Style

Gültekin YC, Fehenberger T, Alvarado A, Willems FMJ. Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping. Entropy. 2020; 22(5):581. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050581

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gültekin, Yunus Can, Tobias Fehenberger, Alex Alvarado, and Frans M. J. Willems. 2020. "Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping" Entropy 22, no. 5: 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050581

APA Style

Gültekin, Y. C., Fehenberger, T., Alvarado, A., & Willems, F. M. J. (2020). Probabilistic Shaping for Finite Blocklengths: Distribution Matching and Sphere Shaping. Entropy, 22(5), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050581

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop