Next Article in Journal
Effect of Potassium-Ion-Triggered Double Helix Aggregation on Shakedown Behavior of κ-Carrageenan/Polyacrylamide Hydrogel
Previous Article in Journal
Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOF)-Derived Gel Electrolyte via UV Cross-Linking for High-Performance Lithium Metal Batteries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanogel Dressing with Targeted Glucose Reduction and pH/Hyaluronidase Dual-Responsive Release for Synergetic Therapy of Diabetic Bacterial Wounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Poloxamer-Driven Drug Delivery System for Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Approach

by
Rodrigo Rhinow
1,
Margareth K. K. D. Franco
2,*,
Mont Kumpugdee Vollrath
3,
Guinther Kellermann
1,4 and
Fabiano Yokaichiya
1,4
1
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia e Ciência dos Materiais, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil
2
Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
3
Pharmazeutische Technologie, Berliner Hochschule für Technik, 13353 Berlin, Germany
4
Department of Physics, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gels 2025, 11(6), 410; https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11060410
Submission received: 30 April 2025 / Revised: 23 May 2025 / Accepted: 28 May 2025 / Published: 30 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Gels Applied in Drug Delivery)

Abstract

Poloxamer-based drug delivery systems are widely used in the pharmaceutical sector. The structural characterization of these systems is crucial for the development of new drug delivery systems and for the optimization of their properties. In this study, we utilized small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) to investigate the structures of poloxamer-based drug delivery systems. The samples were measured using the SANS technique on the VSANS-V16 instrument at Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin (HZB), Germany. The samples contained 20% poloxamer (P407) and 0.2% of a drug (ibuprofen, ketoprofen, diclofenac) in deuterated water (D2O) for SANS. The samples varied in terms of temperature analysis (25 °C, common storage temperature; 37 °C, human body temperature; 40 °C, fever temperature). The data analysis involved modeling the data using a Python-based routine. The model used consisted of an isotropic solution of polydisperse spherical micelles. The intensity as a function of the scattering vector was modeled as the product of the form factor and the interparticle structure factor, with the latter described within the local monodisperse approximation regime. Additionally, a scattering contribution was observed, which was associated with the presence of crystalline superstructures formed by micelles that organized into a cubic structure. The data analysis provided important information about the system, such as the average radius, the size distribution, and the thickness of the layer surrounding the micellar core. The results will contribute to the development and optimization of new drug delivery systems that are more effective and safer for medical applications.

1. Introduction

Poloxamer-based drug carrier systems have emerged as a promising approach for sustained drug release due to their properties, such as their low toxicity, physicochemical characteristics, amphiphilicity, and ability to form micelles in aqueous solutions [1]. Poloxamers, also known as pluronics, which organize themselves into micellar aggregates, are a class of amphiphilic block copolymers that are widely used as drug delivery systems due to their unique physicochemical properties [2]. These copolymers consist of hydrophilic poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blocks and hydrophobic poly(propylene oxide) (PPO) blocks, which enable them to self-assemble into micelles in aqueous solutions [3]. The micellar structures formed by poloxamers can effectively encapsulate hydrophobic drugs, improving their solubility, stability, and bioavailability [4]. Additionally, poloxamers can modulate the release rate of the encapsulated drug, providing controlled or sustained drug release, which is crucial in minimizing side effects and enhancing the therapeutic efficacy [5]. Their versatility allows poloxamers to be used in various drug delivery applications, including oral, parenteral, and topical routes [6]. Poloxamer-based formulations also exhibit excellent biocompatibility and low toxicity, making them attractive for use in both the pharmaceutical and biomedical fields [4]. Furthermore, the ability to tailor their compositions and properties enables the design of drug delivery systems for a wide range of therapeutic agents, including anti-inflammatory drugs, anticancer agents, and antibiotics [7].
Ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and diclofenac are all nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) used to treat pain, inflammation, and fever, but they differ in terms of their chemical structures, potency, and side effects [8,9]. These drugs work by inhibiting cyclooxygenase enzymes and subsequently reduce the synthesis of prostaglandin chemicals [10,11] involved in inflammation, pain, and fever. They are effective for a variety of conditions, including headaches, muscle aches, menstrual cramps, arthritis, and minor injuries [12,13,14,15]. Despite their widespread use, it is important to follow suitable dosing guidelines, as their excessive use can lead to side effects such as gastrointestinal issues when taken orally, kidney damage, and an increased risk of heart problems [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Moreover, these drugs are also known for their poor solubility [23,24,25]. In order to address these challenges, various drug delivery systems, such as nanoparticles, liposomes, and solid–lipid nanoparticles, are employed to improve the solubility, bioavailability, and controlled release of these drugs [26]. These carriers can protect the drug from degradation, provide sustained release, and reduce the frequency of dosing [27], ultimately improving patient compliance. Additionally, by targeting specific tissue types or organs, drug carriers can help to minimize the systemic side effects commonly associated with these drugs, such as stomach ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding [28,29], where diclofenac is more aggressive [17].
The use of small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) plays a significant role in studying drug carriers, particularly in the characterization of their structural properties at the nanoscale [30]. SANS allows for the investigation of the size, shape, and distribution of drug delivery systems such as liposomes, micelles, and nanoparticles, providing insights into their formation, stability, and interactions with biological environments [31]. This technique allows us to obtain valuable information about the morphology and internal organization of these carriers, which is crucial in optimizing drug release profiles, improving bioavailability, and ensuring targeted delivery [32]. The ability to probe these structures in a non-destructive manner makes SANS a powerful tool in the development of more effective and efficient pharmaceutical carriers.
The use of drug carriers for ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and diclofenac delivery has gained significant attention in pharmaceutical research, as these carriers can enhance the drug’s therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects [29]. Thus, in this study, we used the SANS technique to investigate how the anti-inflammatory drugs ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and diclofenac affect the structures of poloxamer-based (P407) drug carrier systems.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results

To perform accurate data modeling, a computational model was developed in Python 3.12 using libraries such as numpy, matplotlib, and scipy [33,34,35]. The fitting process was performed using the least squares method, available in the scipy library, which minimizes the differences between the calculated curve and the experimental curve. In this way, the program can determine the ideal parameters so that the computational model coherently resembles the experimental curves.
For small-angle scattering (SAS), the intensity function relates the intensity of the measured scattering to the scattering vector (q). The intensity function can be decomposed into two main components: the form factor (P(q)) and the structure factor (S(q)). The form factor describes the contribution to the scattering of a single particle or structure within the sample. It is determined by the Fourier transform of the scattering density of the particle, providing information about the size, shape, and internal distribution of the particle. The structure factor considers the interactions between particles in the sample. It reflects the pattern of spatial correlations between particles and can reveal information about the nanoscopic organization or the formation of aggregates in the sample. Additional factors can be included to describe other parameters, such as the polydispersity of the sample and the semicrystalline contribution, as in the present study.

2.1.1. Form Factor

The form factor is a function that describes the scattering of neutrons by a specific particle or structure, taking into account its shape and distribution. This function is essential to elucidate the scattering patterns obtained and to extract detailed information about the size, shape, and orientation of particles in a solution. Three form factors were tested for data modeling: a uniform homogeneous sphere, a core–shell model, and a spherical core with attached Gaussian chains. The normalized form factor of a homogeneous sphere is given by
P s p h e r e q , R s = 3 J 1 q R s q R s = 3 q R s s i n q R s q R s 2 c o s q R s q R s 2 = 9 s i n q R s q R s c o s q R s 2 q R s 6
where Rs represents the radius of the hydrophobic core of the micelle, and J1 is the first spherical Bessel function, given by J 1 x = s i n x x 2 c o s x x . Other form factors were considered, such as the core–shell model (Equation (3)):
F C o r e S h e l l q = 3 V c o r e ρ c o r e ρ s o l v e n t J 1 q R c o r e q R c o r e + V s h e l l ρ s h e l l ρ s o l v e n t J 1 q R s h e l l q R s h e l l =
= 3 V s h e l l V c o r e ρ c o r e ρ s o l v e n t sin q R c o r e q R c o r e cos q R c o r e q R c o r e 3 + V s h e l l ρ s h e l l ρ s o l v e n t sin q R s h e l l q R s h e l l cos q R s h e l l q R s h e l l 3
The subscripts shell, core, and solvent refer to the shell, the core of the micelles, and the solvent in which the sample is embedded, respectively. Moreover, ρ represents the scattering length density, Vcore is the core volume, and Vshell is the total volume of the nanoparticle. Using Equation (2), we can express the form factor of the core–shell model (Equation (3)), obtaining the form factor of this model:
P C o r e S h e l l q = k V s F C o r e S h e l l 2
The model of a spherical, homogeneous micellar core with attached Gaussian chains is given by the following form factor (Equation (4)):
P q , R s = N 2 γ s 2 P s q , R s + N γ c 2 P c q , R g + N N 1 γ c 2 S c c + 2 N 2 γ c γ s S s c
where the subscripts s and c refer to the core of uniform spherical micelles (core radius = Rs) and the attached Gaussian chains (radius of gyration = Rg), and N is the aggregation number of the micelle. The total excess scattering density of a chain within the core is given by γs, or, within the corona, by γc. The term Ps(q, Rs) is the normalized autocorrelation term for a uniform sphere, and Pc(q, Rg) is the autocorrelation term for Gaussian chains. Ssc is the cross-interference term between the sphere and the Gaussian chain starting at the sphere’s surface, and Scc is the interference term between Gaussian chains attached to the surface of a sphere.
Both models—the core–shell and the spherical core with Gaussian chains (Equations (3) and (4))—incorporate a larger number of parameters in the data modeling as compared to the homogeneous sphere model (Equation (1)). However, we believe that the difference (scattering length) between water and the micellar chains external to the core is not significant, meaning that the scattering lengths of the water and micellar chains have similar values. Thus, the interference factor (S(q)), together with the contribution of the ordered structure, exerts a more significant influence on the curve shape compared to the form factor. To optimize the simulation time, the form factor equation for a homogeneous sphere, as described in Equation (1), was selected.

2.1.2. Structure Factor

The structure factor in X-ray scattering is an essential quantity in the characterization of high-concentration structures, as shown in this study, with poloxamer concentrations higher than 20%. This parameter is directly related to the distribution of relative distances between micelles. Considering that the particle concentration is nonzero, the scattering cross-section includes contributions from the interparticle structure factor S(q), which becomes more relevant as the concentration increases. To describe the behavior of the particle concentration, an interference function based on the solution of the Ornstein–Zernike integral equation is used, which establishes a relationship between the direct correlation function c(r) and the total correlation function h(r). Here, N ¯ = N / V represents the number density of particles.
h r = c r + N ¯ d r c r r h ( r )
Jerome K. Percus and George J. Yevick proposed a closure relation for systems of rigid spherical particles, as a simple model of liquids, known as the Percus–Yevick approximation [36,37]. This approximation provides an approximate relation between the total correlation functions h r and the direct correlation functions c r , given by
c r = h r + 1 1 e V r β
where β = −1/kbT, with kb being the Boltzmann constant, T the temperature, and V(r) the interaction potential of hard spheres between the particles, such that
V(r) = 0 for r > D
V(r) = for r < D
where r is the effective interaction radius and D is the sphere diameter. Since the potential V(r) is either zero or infinite, the Boltzmann factor eV(r)β is equal to one or zero, regardless of the temperature T. Therefore, the structure of a hard-sphere fluid is independent of the temperature. This leaves only two parameters to be analyzed: the radius of the rigid part R and the volume fraction ϕ(Reff), resulting in Equation (14).
δ = 1 + 2 ϕ 2 1 ϕ 4
β = 3 ϕ 2 + ϕ 2 2 1 ϕ 4
f 1 Q = s i n Q Q c o s Q Q 3
f 2 Q = 2 Q s i n Q Q 2 2 c o s Q 2 Q 4
f 3 Q = 4 Q 3 24 Q s i n Q Q 4 12 Q 2 + 24 c o s Q + 24 Q 6
S P Y Q , R e f f = 1 1 + 24 ϕ δ f 1 + β f 2 + 1 2 δ ϕ f 3
where Q = 2qReff, ϕ = ϕ(Reff), and Reff is the effective interaction radius. The interference equation is used in a product with the sphere form factor to describe the intensity detected in concentrated systems [38,39,40].

2.1.3. Polydispersity

A Gaussian function (Equation (15)) is also used to simulate the polydispersity of the micelles [41], for both the first population (micelles) and the second population (free polymer chains):
f R s = 1 σ 2 π e x p R s R m 2 2 σ 2
where Rm is the average radius of the particles, and σ is the standard deviation of the micelles.

2.1.4. Ordered Contribution

The form factors, structure factors, and Gaussian polydispersity function were not sufficient to fit the model to the experimental data, which could be attributed to the formation of cubic superstructures, as observed in SANS measurements and reported in the literature [42,43].
Since the relative position of the peaks with respect to the scattering vector (q/q0) is known, we observe that the SANS intensity spectrum presents the contribution of a face-centered cubic (FCC) structure. Thus, it is possible to obtain the structural parameters of the sample, since the position of the peaks is inversely related to the distances between the scattering planes in the material, with d being the lattice parameter, as described in Equation (16):
d = 2 π q
Consequently, a model was developed that takes into account the interparticle interaction of the superstructure, modeling the characteristic curves at the positions of the known peaks (Table 1).
In order to consider the contributions of the superstructure, a convolution of Gaussian functions at the known positions was added:
g q 0 / q q = 1 σ F C C 2 π e x p q q 0 2 2 σ F C C 2
where q0 is the peak position and σFCC is the standard deviation of the function. Thus, the structural contribution for an FCC structure is given by Equation (18):
I F C C q = k 3 ( a 1 g 1 q + a 2 g 4 3 q + a 3 g 8 3 q + a 4 g 11 3 q + a 5 g 4 q )
where a1,…,5 are the characteristic amplitudes of the structure’s peaks.
The SANS technique reveals intensity curves for the poloxamer P407 samples that resemble models of polydisperse spherical micelles [41], which is in agreement with the literature [44,45]. The model is given by the local monodisperse approximation (LMA), described by Pedersen and Gerstenberg [46,47,48], taking into account both the form factor and the interparticle interference factor. A Gaussian function was used to describe the radial distribution of the micelles, together with a contribution from the observed cubic superstructure [41].
A new contribution was added, arising from a second population of nanoparticles that were smaller than micelles, which we believe to be polymer chains that did not form micelles. However, this population had a much smaller concentration compared to the first population, and it was not necessary to add the contribution of a structure factor. Therefore, our model to describe drug carrier systems is given by the following Equation (19):
I q = i = 1 l k 1 V 1 2 R 1 s , i P 1 q , R 1 s , i f 1 R 1 s , i S P Y q , R 1 e f f Δ R 1 s , i + k 2 V 2 2 R 2 s , i P 2 q , R 2 s , i f 2 R 2 s , i Δ R 2 s , i + I F C C q + b k g
where indices 1 and 2 represent the first and second particle populations, respectively; k is the scaling factor of their respective contributions to the obtained intensity curve; and bkg is the background scattering, a constant value that does not result from the structures and nanoparticles (micelles and polymer chains) present in the sample (background). For a good approximation, l = 400 was chosen. With this model, it was possible to achieve a precise fit of the obtained curves.

2.1.5. Porod Constant

In the interest of removing the portion of the scattering corresponding to a constant contribution to the scattering intensity, Porod’s Law is used [36], which states that, in the high q region, the intensity is proportional to the constant Kp, known as Porod’s constant.
I q = K p q 4 + b k g   for   q
By multiplying Equation (20) by q4, we obtain Equation (21):
I q q 4 = b k g q 4 + K p
which describes linear behavior for high q values, allowing the determination of the slope (bkg), which represents a constant contribution from variations in the electron density at the interface between the nanoparticles and their surrounding medium. We can then subtract bkg from the total intensity value and obtain exclusively the scattering contribution from the nanoparticles (Figure 1).

2.2. Discussion

No significant difference was observed in the scattering profiles in relation to the temperature in the control sample (without any drug) (Figure 2a). Figure 2 shows the results obtained in the presence of drugs. For the curves shown in Figure 2, no significant change was observed in relation to the temperature, following the behavior of the control sample.
For this study, analyses were performed with the anti-inflammatory drugs ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and diclofenac. Figure 3 shows the scattering curves and the functions used for data modeling, for P407 samples without and with ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and diclofenac at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 40 °C.
Table 2 and Table 3 list the data of the parameters used to model the scattering curves of the nanoparticles and the superstructures formed by P407, with which the mean and effective radii (Figure 4) of the micelles were estimated. Figure 5 shows the behavior of these parameters in relation to the temperature for each of the systems.
Each sample presented different behavior as a function of the temperature. The slight growth of the core was observed, as in the case of ibuprofen.
A slight temperature-dependent decrease was observed for diclofenac, with a value of 1.81 Å. We can observe that the average radius of the interior of the micelle, Rm, does not vary as a function of the temperature (Figure 5a).
The graphs in Figure 5b show that the effective radius (Reff) is not significantly affected by the temperature; however, small differences are observed in this parameter according to the drug incorporated in P407.
Another important parameter analyzed was the superstructure lattice parameter, obtained by Equation (16). When observing the graphs shown in Figure 5c, no direct correlation was identified between the temperature and lattice parameter. However, samples containing drugs, such as diclofenac 0.2%, presented similar lattice parameters, albeit slightly smaller than that of the control sample, without the inclusion of drugs.
The polydispersity of the micelle interior, σ, ranged from 9 to 13 Å for all samples. The second population of nanoparticles (polymer chains) presented an average radius of approximately 15% of the total micelle radius, with a variation (σ2) observed between 1 and 3 Å. The volume fraction (ϕ) presented values between 0.41 and 0.53, varying from measurement to measurement.

3. Conclusions

The presented model proved to be effective in modeling small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) data for the studied anti-inflammatory drugs, allowing the investigation of the relationship between the structural characteristics of the samples with and without drugs as a function of the temperature. No significant variations were observed in the mean radius of the interior of the micelles, in the effective interaction radius, or in the lattice parameter with the variation in temperature. Some discrepant values may have been due to the incorporated drug and its characteristics, such as its polarity and size, for example.
Obtaining structural parameters through data modeling and studying the phase transitions of drug carrier systems in detail can bring significant benefits to the pharmaceutical industry. These parameters, such as the mean micelle radius, the effective interaction radius, and the lattice parameter, provide crucial information about the organization and behavior of micelles under different temperature and concentration conditions.
This knowledge can be used to optimize drug formulations, improving the stability, solubility, and bioavailability of encapsulated drugs and, most importantly, expanding the possible applications. This can result in greater therapeutic efficiency and a better patient experience, driving innovation in new drugs and their forms of administration.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Samples

The samples analyzed at HZB using the SANS technique contained 20% poloxamer (P407). P407 is a tri-block copolymer composed of a hydrophobic central block of poly(propylene glycol) (PPG), surrounded by two hydrophilic blocks of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). The central block consists of 56 PPG units, represented by B, while the ends are formed by 101 PEG units (A), as illustrated in Figure 6. P407 has a molecular mass of 12,600 g/mol and a hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) of 22 [49].
P407 samples for SANS measurements were prepared with 0.2% concentrations of the anti-inflammatory drugs ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and diclofenac in deuterated water (D2O). The formation of micelles, encapsulating the drugs inside, is expected when the P407 concentration is sufficiently high, above its CMC, and with supramicellar aggregates, as shown in Figure 7. The samples varied in their incubation temperatures: 25 °C (room temperature), 37 °C (human body temperature), and 40 °C (hyperthermia).
To prepare the samples, the transition from liquid to the lower gel phase, which occurs at temperatures below 15 °C, as proposed by Schmolka in 1972 [51], was respected. P407 was slowly added to a container with water in an inverted water bath with ice on a magnetic stirrer until completely dissolved. This was followed by an equilibration period of 8 to 24 h in a refrigerator. The inverted water bath was necessary to maintain the sample in its liquid state, allowing the incorporation of the drug.

4.2. Experimental Setup

Small-Angle Neutron Scattering. Neutron scattering measurements (SANS) were performed with a VSANS-V16 time-of-flight (very small-angle scattering) instrument at Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Germany (Figure 8).
Two configurations were used based on the distance from the detector to the sample: 1.7 m with neutron wavelengths of 1.8–3.8 Å and 11 m with neutron wavelengths of 1.6–9.2 Å. The samples were placed in Hellma 110 QS cuvettes, and a waiting period of 30 min between acquisitions was used to ensure temperature stabilization. The samples were prepared in D2O to ensure significant contrast between the solvent and the nanoparticles, and they were measured at 25, 37, and 40 °C, as shown in Table 4. Corrections for sample transmission, background detector counts, empty cell scattering, and detector efficiency were included in the final data reduction. The SANS data were radially averaged and merged to give a total q range of 0.005–0.5 Å

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.K.K.D.F., M.K.V. and F.Y.; Methodology, R.R., G.K. and F.Y.; Software, R.R.; Validation, R.R., M.K.K.D.F. and F.Y.; Formal analysis, R.R. and M.K.K.D.F.; Investigation, R.R., M.K.K.D.F., G.K. and F.Y.; Resources, M.K.V.; Data curation, G.K.; Writing—original draft, M.K.K.D.F.; Writing—review & editing, M.K.K.D.F. and F.Y.; Supervision, M.K.K.D.F. and F.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no know competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Zarrintaj, P.; Ramsey, J.D.; Samadi, A.; Atoufi, Z.; Yazdi, M.K.; Ganjali, M.R.; Amirabad, L.M.; Zangene, E.; Farokhi, M.; Formela, K.; et al. Poloxamer: A versatile tri-block copolymer for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2020, 110, 37–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bodratti, A.M.; Alexandridis, P. Formulation of Poloxamers for Drug Delivery. J. Funct. Biomater. 2018, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cabral, H.; Miyata, K.; Osada, K.; Kataoka, K. Block Copolymer Micelles in Nanomedicine Applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 6844–6892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nugraha, D.H.; Anggadiredja, K.; Rachmawati, H. Mini-review of poloxamer as a biocompatible polymer for advanced drug delivery. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 58, e21125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gonzalez, Y.M.; Ghaly, E.S. Modified drug release of poloxamer matrix by including water-soluble and water-insoluble polymer. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2010, 36, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Monti, D.; Burgalassi, S.; Rossato, M.; Albertini, B.; Passerini, N.; Rodriguez, L.; Chetoni, P. Poloxamer 407 microspheres for orotransmucosal drug delivery. Part II: In vitro/in vivo evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 2010, 400, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sahoo, G.P.; Rai, V.K.; Pradhan, D.; Halder, J.; Rajwar, T.K.; Mahanty, R.; Saha, I.; Mishra, A.; Dash, P.; Dash, C.; et al. A doxorubicin loaded chitosan–poloxamer in situ implant for the treatment of breast cancer. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 33952–33967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vane, J.R.; Botting, R.M. The mechanism of action of aspirin. Thrombosis Res. 2003, 110, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Michaelidou, A.S.; Hadjipavlou-Litina, D. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): A comparative QSAR study. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3235–3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rainsford, K.D. Ibuprofen: Pharmacology, efficacy, and safety. Inflammopharmacology 2009, 17, 275–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. FitzGerald, G.A. Cardiovascular pharmacology of nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and coxibs: Clinical considerations. Am. J. Cardiol. 2002, 89, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mazaleuskaya, L.L.; Theken, K.N.; Gong, L.; Thorn, C.F.; FitzGerald, G.A.; Altman, R.B.; Klein, T.E. PharmGKB summary: Ibuprofen pathways. Pharmacogenet. Genom. 2025, 25, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wiffen, P.J.; Xia, J. Systematic review of topical diclofenac for the treatment of acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2020, 36, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarzi-Puttini, P.; Atzeni, F.; Lanata, L.; Bagnasco, M.; Colombo, M.; Fischer, F.; D’Imporzano, M. Pain and ketoprofen: What is its role in clinical practice. Reumatismo 2010, 62, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marjoribanks, J.; Ayeleke, R.; Farquhar, C.; Proctor, M. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhea. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2003, 4, CD001751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Irvine, J.; Afrose, A.; Islam, N. Formulation and delivery strategies of ibuprofen: Challenges and opportunities. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2018, 44, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Drini, M. Peptic ulcer disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Aust. Prescr. 2017, 40, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wu, H.; Huang, J. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity: Pathogenic mechanisms, biomarkers and prevention strategies. Curr. Drug Metab. 2018, 19, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huerta, C.; Varas-Lorenzo, C.; Castellsague, J.; Rodriguez, L.G. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of first hospital admission for heart failure in the general population. Heart 2006, 92, 1610–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, X.; Donnan, P.T.; Bell, S.; Guthrie, B. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced acute kidney injury in the community dwelling general population and people with chronic kidney disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2017, 18, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Varga, Z.; Sabzwari, S.R.A.; Vargova, V. Cardiovascular risk of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: An under-recognized public health issue. Cureus 2017, 9, e1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lanas, A.; Hunt, R. Prevention of anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal damage: Benefits and risks of therapeutic strategies. Ann. Med. 2006, 38, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hedaya, M.; Bandarkar, F.; Nada, A. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of ibuprofen nanosuspensions for enhanced oral bioavailability. Med. Princ. Pract. 2021, 30, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kumar, B.; Sahani, V.; Patil, S. Review on Ketoprofen (Anti-Inflammatory Drug). J. Res. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 2024, 3, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Naseri, N.; Valizadeh, H.; Zakeri-Milani, P. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: Structure, preparation and application. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 5, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mihaylov, V.; Tosheva, M.; Petrov, V.; Titeva, S. Technological approaches to increase the bioavailability of Ibuprofen. Pharmacia 2025, 72, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jamroży, M.; Kudłacik-Kramarczyk, S.; Drabczyk, A.; Krzan, M. Advanced drug carriers: A review of selected protein, polysaccharide, and lipid drug delivery platforms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, P.; Chen, G.; Zhang, J. A review of liposomes as a drug delivery system: Current status of approved products, regulatory environments, and future perspectives. Molecules 2022, 27, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Van Alem, C.M.A.; Metselaar, J.M.; van Kooten, C.; Rotmans, J.I. Recent advances in liposomal-based anti-inflammatory therapy. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Spinozzi, F.; Alcaraz, J.-P.; Ortore, M.G.; Gayet, L.; Radulescu, A.; Martin, D.K.; Maccarini, M. Small-angle neutron scattering reveals the nanostructure of liposomes with embedded OprF porins of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Langmuir 2022, 38, 15026–15037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adhikari, L.; Mishra, H.; Semalty, M.; Semalty, A. Small angle Neutron scattering in drug discovery research: A novel tool for advanced study of structures of biological macromolecules. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2023, 20, 36–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, B.; Lowe, J.P.; Schweins, R.; Edler, K.J. Small angle neutron scattering studies on the internal structure of poly (lactide-co-glycolide)-block-poly (ethylene glycol) nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Virtanen, P.; Gommers, R.; Oliphant, T.E.; Haberland, M.; Reddy, T.; Cournapeau, D.; Burovski, E.; Peterson, P.; Weckesser, W.; Bright, J.; et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nat. Methods 2020, 17, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hunter, J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Harris, C.R.; Millman, K.J.; van der Walt, S.J.; Gommers, R.; Virtanen, P.; Cournapeau, D.; Wieser, E.; Taylor, J.; Berg, S.; Smith, N.J.; et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 2020, 585, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guinier, A.; Fournet, G. Small Angle Scattering of X-Rays; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1955. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jaclsch, S. Small-Angle Scattering. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1901.07353. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wertheim, M. Exact solution of the Percus-Yevick integral equation for hard spheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1963, 10, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kinning, D.J.; Thomas, E.L. Hard-sphere interactions between spherical domains in diblock copolymers. Macromolecules 1984, 17, 1712–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ashcroft, N.W.; Lekner, R.J. Structure and resistivity of liquid metals. Phys. Rev. 1966, 145, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Castelletto, V.; Caillet, C.; Fundin, J.; Hamley, I.W.; Yang, Z.; Kelarakis, A. The liquid–solid transition in a micellar solution of a diblock copolymer in water. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 10947–11095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sakuma, F.; Higashi, K.; Ueda, K.; Morita, T.; Iohara, D.; Hirayama, F.; Moribe, K. Effect of Acetaminophen on Poloxamer 407 Micelles and Hydrogels: The Relationship between Structural and Physical Properties. Langmuir 2024, 40, 15610–15620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sepulveda, A.F.; Kumpgdee-Vollrath, M.; Franco, M.K.; Yokaichiya, F.; de Araujo, D.R. Supramolecular structure organization and rheological properties modulate the performance of hyaluronic acid-loaded thermosensitive hydrogels as drug-delivery systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 630, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Y.; Shi, T.; Sun, Z.; An, L.; Huang, Q. Investigation of sol- gel transition in Pluronic F127/D2O solutions using a combination of small-angle neutron scattering and Monte Carlo simulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 26424–26429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Valero, M.; Hu, W.; Houston, J.E.; Dreiss, C.A. Solubilisation of salicylate in F127 micelles: Effect of pH and temperature on morphology and interactions with cyclodextrin. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 322, 114892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pedersen, J.S. Determination of size distribution from small-angle scattering data for systems with effective hard-sphere interactions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1994, 27, 595–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pedersen, J.S.; Gerstenberg, M.C. Scattering form factor of block copolymer micelles. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 1363–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pedersen, J.S. Form factors of block copolymer micelles with spherical, ellipsoidal and cylindrical cores. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2000, 33, 637–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Betancourt, T. Targetable Biodegradable Nanoparticles for Delivery of Chemotherapeutic and Imaging Agents to Ovarian Cancer; The University of Texas at Austin: Austin, TX, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-0-549-34761-3. [Google Scholar]
  50. Choi, B.M.; Hwang, C.S.; Yoon, Y.S.; Park, I.J.; Yoo, M.W.; Kim, B.S. Novel temperature-responsive hydrogel injected to the incision site for postoperative pain relief in laparoscopic abdominal surgery: A single-blind, randomized, pivotal clinical trial. Surg. Endosc. 2022, 36, 5794–5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Schmolka, I.R. Artificial skin I. Preparation and properties of pluronic F-127 gels for treatment of burns. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1972, 6, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scattering intensity of the P407 sample (20%) and ibuprofen (0.2%) at 25 °C. The red curve represents the total scattering, and the blue curve represents the scattering without the constant contribution, depicted by the green curve. We observe that the difference in contribution is only significant for q > 0.075 Å−1.
Figure 1. Scattering intensity of the P407 sample (20%) and ibuprofen (0.2%) at 25 °C. The red curve represents the total scattering, and the blue curve represents the scattering without the constant contribution, depicted by the green curve. We observe that the difference in contribution is only significant for q > 0.075 Å−1.
Gels 11 00410 g001
Figure 2. Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) curves for sample with 20% poloxamer (a), 20% poloxamer and 0.2% ketoprofen (b), 20% poloxamer and 0.2% ibuprofen (c), and 20% poloxamer and 0.2% diclofenac (d).
Figure 2. Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) curves for sample with 20% poloxamer (a), 20% poloxamer and 0.2% ketoprofen (b), 20% poloxamer and 0.2% ibuprofen (c), and 20% poloxamer and 0.2% diclofenac (d).
Gels 11 00410 g002
Figure 3. Small-angle neutron scattering curves of (a) P407 20% without drug addition (25 °C) and with (b,e,h) ketoprofen 0.2%, (c,f,i) ibuprofen 0.2%, and (d,g,j) diclofenac 0.2%, at (ad) 25 °C, (eg) 37 °C, and (hj) 40 °C. The functions used to model the data are multiplied by a scaling factor for better visualization.
Figure 3. Small-angle neutron scattering curves of (a) P407 20% without drug addition (25 °C) and with (b,e,h) ketoprofen 0.2%, (c,f,i) ibuprofen 0.2%, and (d,g,j) diclofenac 0.2%, at (ad) 25 °C, (eg) 37 °C, and (hj) 40 °C. The functions used to model the data are multiplied by a scaling factor for better visualization.
Gels 11 00410 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representing the average radius of the micelle’s core (Rm) and the effective interaction radius between micelles (Reff).
Figure 4. Schematic representing the average radius of the micelle’s core (Rm) and the effective interaction radius between micelles (Reff).
Gels 11 00410 g004
Figure 5. (a) Variation in the average radius parameter (Rm) of the micelle core with temperature; (b) variation in the effective radius (Reff) with temperature; and (c) variation in the lattice parameter (Equation (16)) with temperature for P407 samples containing ketoprofen, ibuprofen, and diclofenac.
Figure 5. (a) Variation in the average radius parameter (Rm) of the micelle core with temperature; (b) variation in the effective radius (Reff) with temperature; and (c) variation in the lattice parameter (Equation (16)) with temperature for P407 samples containing ketoprofen, ibuprofen, and diclofenac.
Gels 11 00410 g005
Figure 6. Chemical structure of the ABA-type triblock copolymer, Poloxamer (P407).
Figure 6. Chemical structure of the ABA-type triblock copolymer, Poloxamer (P407).
Gels 11 00410 g006
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the formation of micelles and gels of P407. The phase transitions include liquid–gel, which occurs at approximately 15 °C, and gel–liquid, observed at around 75 °C. Adapted from [50].
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the formation of micelles and gels of P407. The phase transitions include liquid–gel, which occurs at approximately 15 °C, and gel–liquid, observed at around 75 °C. Adapted from [50].
Gels 11 00410 g007
Figure 8. V16/VSANS equipment from chopper section (left side) to detector chamber (right side).
Figure 8. V16/VSANS equipment from chopper section (left side) to detector chamber (right side).
Gels 11 00410 g008
Table 1. Relative positions of diffraction peaks for BCC and FCC cubic structures.
Table 1. Relative positions of diffraction peaks for BCC and FCC cubic structures.
Relative   Position   ( q / q 0 )
BCCFCC
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 1 , 4 3 , 8 3 , 11 3 , 4
Table 2. Parameters used for the modeling of nanoparticles (micelles and polymer chains) in the scattering function.
Table 2. Parameters used for the modeling of nanoparticles (micelles and polymer chains) in the scattering function.
NameConcentration
(%)
Temperature
(°C)
Rm
(Å)
σ 1 Rm2
(Å)
σ 2 bkg
Pure02535.668.2010.301.380.031
Ketoprofen0.22543.239.876.321.670.016
3743.4010.827.931.790.017
4043.3510.817.532.250.017
Ibuprofen2542.689.507.171.780.017
3743.369.607.651.800.017
4043.769.887.601.900.018
Diclofenac2545.438.336.442.010.033
3743.839.528.872.690.010
4043.628.4110.231.890.024
Table 3. Parameters used for the modeling of the superstructure in the scattering function.
Table 3. Parameters used for the modeling of the superstructure in the scattering function.
NameLattice Parameter
(Å)
Reff
(Å)
ϕ σ F C C a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 5
Pure174.2990.120.460.002510.123.971.360.080.04
Ketoprofen185.76101.660.480.00309.682.002.220.080.08
185.05102.630.500.00309.834.002.150.080.10
185.18102.970.500.00299.833.962.130.070.09
Ibuprofen189.46105.630.500.0026104.001.300.010.01
189.34105.230.490.0026104.001.300.010.01
190.20105.660.500.0026104.001.300.010.01
Diclofenac171.7095.170.500.0029104.001.300.010.01
177.2896.920.530.002810.484.501.700.120.05
175.4796.350.510.002910.324.171.190.030.03
Table 4. Table of neutron low-angle scattering (SANS) measurements performed using the VSANS-16 instrument, HZB.
Table 4. Table of neutron low-angle scattering (SANS) measurements performed using the VSANS-16 instrument, HZB.
DrugConcentration (%)Temperature (°C)
N/A025
Diclofenac0.225, 37, 40
Ketoprofen0.225, 37, 40
Ibuprofen0.225, 37, 40
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rhinow, R.; Franco, M.K.K.D.; Vollrath, M.K.; Kellermann, G.; Yokaichiya, F. Poloxamer-Driven Drug Delivery System for Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Approach. Gels 2025, 11, 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11060410

AMA Style

Rhinow R, Franco MKKD, Vollrath MK, Kellermann G, Yokaichiya F. Poloxamer-Driven Drug Delivery System for Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Approach. Gels. 2025; 11(6):410. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11060410

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rhinow, Rodrigo, Margareth K. K. D. Franco, Mont Kumpugdee Vollrath, Guinther Kellermann, and Fabiano Yokaichiya. 2025. "Poloxamer-Driven Drug Delivery System for Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Approach" Gels 11, no. 6: 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11060410

APA Style

Rhinow, R., Franco, M. K. K. D., Vollrath, M. K., Kellermann, G., & Yokaichiya, F. (2025). Poloxamer-Driven Drug Delivery System for Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Using Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Approach. Gels, 11(6), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels11060410

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop