Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (30)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = sister chromatid cohesion

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1900 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Significance of DSCC1, a Biomarker Associated with Aggressive Features of Breast Cancer
by Abrar I. Aljohani
Medicina 2024, 60(12), 1929; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60121929 - 23 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1098
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Invasive breast cancer (BC) was traditionally investigated visually, and no technique could identify the key molecular drivers of patient survival. However, essential molecular drivers of invasive BC have now been discovered using innovative genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic methodologies. Nevertheless, [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Invasive breast cancer (BC) was traditionally investigated visually, and no technique could identify the key molecular drivers of patient survival. However, essential molecular drivers of invasive BC have now been discovered using innovative genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic methodologies. Nevertheless, few evaluations of the prognostic factors of BC in Saudi Arabia have been performed. Evaluating the biomarkers associated with the development of early-stage BC could help determine the risk of metastasis and guide treatment decisions. In a previous study, using large BC cohorts and artificial neural network techniques, DNA replication and sister chromatid cohesion 1 (DSCC1) was found to be one of the principal genes in invasive BC samples. To date, no studies have addressed the prognostic significance of DSCC1 in invasive BC and its association with aggressive tumor behavior. This research aimed to address this gap. Materials and Methods: The association of clinicopathological features and patient outcomes with DSCC1 expression at the mRNA level was assessed using the Molecular Taxonomy Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC; n = 1980) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n = 854) cohorts. DSCC1 was also evaluated at the protein level using immunohistochemistry on samples from invasive BC patients (n = 100) presenting to King Abdul Aziz Specialist Hospital in Saudi Arabia. The association of clinicopathological parameters (including patient age, tumor grade, tumor size, and patient outcome) with protein level was also evaluated. Results: In both METABRIC and TCGA cohorts, high expression of DSCC1 was significantly associated with high histological grade, large tumor size, lymphovascular invasion positivity, and hormone receptor negativity (all p < 0.001). A high DSCC1 mRNA level was associated with poor outcomes (p < 0.001 for METABRIC, p = 0.23 for TCGA). At the protein level, high DSCC1 expression was associated with high histological grade (p = 0.001), lymph node presence (p = 0.008), hormone receptor negativity (p = 0.005), high Ki67 expression (p = 0.036), and shorter survival (p = 0.008). Conclusions: This study confirmed the prognostic significance of DSCC1 in invasive BC patients. DSCC1 could be a therapeutic target in BC cases with poor outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2693 KiB  
Article
Cohesin RAD21 Gene Promoter Methylation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
by Kalliopi N. Manola, Sophia Zachaki, Katerina Kakosaiou, Agapi Ioannidou, Marina Kalomoiraki and Theodoros Rampias
Life 2024, 14(10), 1311; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14101311 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1432
Abstract
Background: Aberrant gene promoter methylation is one of the hallmarks of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). RAD21 is an important gene, implicated in sister chromatids cohesion, DNA repair, the regulation of gene transcription, apoptosis and hematopoiesis. Methods: In this study, we investigate the possible [...] Read more.
Background: Aberrant gene promoter methylation is one of the hallmarks of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). RAD21 is an important gene, implicated in sister chromatids cohesion, DNA repair, the regulation of gene transcription, apoptosis and hematopoiesis. Methods: In this study, we investigate the possible implication of RAD21 promoter methylation in AML pathogenesis using a cohort of AML patients and a cohort of healthy individuals. Results: RAD21 promoter methylation was found in 24% of patients and in none of the controls (p = 0.023), indicating a possible contribution to AML development. Interestingly, a statistically higher frequency of RAD21 methylation was observed in patients with trisomy 8 (9/21, 42.9%, p = 0.021), while none of the patients with aberrations of chromosome 11 had RAD21 gene promoter methylation (0%, 0/11, p = 0.048). Patients with monosomal and complex karyotypes showed low frequencies of RAD21 methylation (7.7% and 15.4%, respectively) without reaching statistical significance. Moreover, ASXL1 mutations were not found to be associated with RAD21 methylation. Conclusions: This is the first study which provides evidence for a possible pathogenetic role of RAD21 promoter methylation in AML development and especially in AML with trisomy 8. Further studies of RAD21 promoter methylation in large series of different AML genetic subgroups may contribute to the elucidation of AML pathogenesis and to the identification of new epigenetic biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic value. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physiology and Pathology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2065 KiB  
Review
Function and Evolution of the Loop Extrusion Machinery in Animals
by Evelyn Kabirova, Artem Nurislamov, Artem Shadskiy, Alexander Smirnov, Andrey Popov, Pavel Salnikov, Nariman Battulin and Veniamin Fishman
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(5), 5017; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24055017 - 6 Mar 2023
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4597
Abstract
Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes are essential proteins found in genomes of all cellular organisms. Essential functions of these proteins, such as mitotic chromosome formation and sister chromatid cohesion, were discovered a long time ago. Recent advances in chromatin biology showed that [...] Read more.
Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes are essential proteins found in genomes of all cellular organisms. Essential functions of these proteins, such as mitotic chromosome formation and sister chromatid cohesion, were discovered a long time ago. Recent advances in chromatin biology showed that SMC proteins are involved in many other genomic processes, acting as active motors extruding DNA, which leads to the formation of chromatin loops. Some loops formed by SMC proteins are highly cell type and developmental stage specific, such as SMC-mediated DNA loops required for VDJ recombination in B-cell progenitors, or dosage compensation in Caenorhabditis elegans and X-chromosome inactivation in mice. In this review, we focus on the extrusion-based mechanisms that are common for multiple cell types and species. We will first describe an anatomy of SMC complexes and their accessory proteins. Next, we provide biochemical details of the extrusion process. We follow this by the sections describing the role of SMC complexes in gene regulation, DNA repair, and chromatin topology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioinformatics of Gene Regulations and Structure - 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1353 KiB  
Review
Separase and Roads to Disengage Sister Chromatids during Anaphase
by Marketa Konecna, Soodabeh Abbasi Sani and Martin Anger
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(5), 4604; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054604 - 27 Feb 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7374
Abstract
Receiving complete and undamaged genetic information is vital for the survival of daughter cells after chromosome segregation. The most critical steps in this process are accurate DNA replication during S phase and a faithful chromosome segregation during anaphase. Any errors in DNA replication [...] Read more.
Receiving complete and undamaged genetic information is vital for the survival of daughter cells after chromosome segregation. The most critical steps in this process are accurate DNA replication during S phase and a faithful chromosome segregation during anaphase. Any errors in DNA replication or chromosome segregation have dire consequences, since cells arising after division might have either changed or incomplete genetic information. Accurate chromosome segregation during anaphase requires a protein complex called cohesin, which holds together sister chromatids. This complex unifies sister chromatids from their synthesis during S phase, until separation in anaphase. Upon entry into mitosis, the spindle apparatus is assembled, which eventually engages kinetochores of all chromosomes. Additionally, when kinetochores of sister chromatids assume amphitelic attachment to the spindle microtubules, cells are finally ready for the separation of sister chromatids. This is achieved by the enzymatic cleavage of cohesin subunits Scc1 or Rec8 by an enzyme called Separase. After cohesin cleavage, sister chromatids remain attached to the spindle apparatus and their poleward movement on the spindle is initiated. The removal of cohesion between sister chromatids is an irreversible step and therefore it must be synchronized with assembly of the spindle apparatus, since precocious separation of sister chromatids might lead into aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. In this review, we focus on recent discoveries concerning the regulation of Separase activity during the cell cycle. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Study of Cell Cycle)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 7851 KiB  
Article
Chl1, an ATP-Dependent DNA Helicase, Inhibits DNA:RNA Hybrids Formation at DSB Sites to Maintain Genome Stability in S. pombe
by Deyun He, Zhen Du, Huiling Xu and Xiaoming Bao
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(12), 6631; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23126631 - 14 Jun 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2652
Abstract
As an ATP-dependent DNA helicase, human ChlR1/DDX11 (Chl1 in yeast) can unwind both DNA:RNA and DNA:DNA substrates in vitro. Studies have demonstrated that ChlR1 plays a vital role in preserving genome stability by participating in DNA repair and sister chromatid cohesion, whereas the [...] Read more.
As an ATP-dependent DNA helicase, human ChlR1/DDX11 (Chl1 in yeast) can unwind both DNA:RNA and DNA:DNA substrates in vitro. Studies have demonstrated that ChlR1 plays a vital role in preserving genome stability by participating in DNA repair and sister chromatid cohesion, whereas the ways in which the biochemical features of ChlR1 function in DNA metabolism are not well understood. Here, we illustrate that Chl1 localizes to double-strand DNA break (DSB) sites and restrains DNA:RNA hybrid accumulation at these loci. Mutation of Chl1 strongly impairs DSB repair capacity by homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathways, and deleting RNase H further reduces DNA repair efficiency, which indicates that the enzymatic activities of Chl1 are needed in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In addition, we found that the Rpc37 subunit of RNA polymerase III (RNA Pol III) interacts directly with Chl1 and that deletion of Chl1 has no influence on the localization of Rpc37 at DSB site, implying the role of Rpc37 in the recruitment of Chl1 to this site. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1875 KiB  
Review
Functions and Regulation of Meiotic HORMA-Domain Proteins
by Josh P. Prince and Enrique Martinez-Perez
Genes 2022, 13(5), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13050777 - 27 Apr 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4323
Abstract
During meiosis, homologous chromosomes must recognize, pair, and recombine with one another to ensure the formation of inter-homologue crossover events, which, together with sister chromatid cohesion, promote correct chromosome orientation on the first meiotic spindle. Crossover formation requires the assembly of axial elements, [...] Read more.
During meiosis, homologous chromosomes must recognize, pair, and recombine with one another to ensure the formation of inter-homologue crossover events, which, together with sister chromatid cohesion, promote correct chromosome orientation on the first meiotic spindle. Crossover formation requires the assembly of axial elements, proteinaceous structures that assemble along the length of each chromosome during early meiosis, as well as checkpoint mechanisms that control meiotic progression by monitoring pairing and recombination intermediates. A conserved family of proteins defined by the presence of a HORMA (HOp1, Rev7, MAd2) domain, referred to as HORMADs, associate with axial elements to control key events of meiotic prophase. The highly conserved HORMA domain comprises a flexible safety belt sequence, enabling it to adopt at least two of the following protein conformations: one closed, where the safety belt encircles a small peptide motif present within an interacting protein, causing its topological entrapment, and the other open, where the safety belt is reorganized and no interactor is trapped. Although functional studies in multiple organisms have revealed that HORMADs are crucial regulators of meiosis, the mechanisms by which HORMADs implement key meiotic events remain poorly understood. In this review, we summarize protein complexes formed by HORMADs, discuss their roles during meiosis in different organisms, draw comparisons to better characterize non-meiotic HORMADs (MAD2 and REV7), and highlight possible areas for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics of Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1704 KiB  
Article
Methylglyoxal Impairs Sister Chromatid Separation in Lymphocytes
by Leigh Donnellan, Clifford Young, Bradley S. Simpson, Varinderpal S. Dhillon, Maurizio Costabile, Peter Hoffmann, Michael Fenech and Permal Deo
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4139; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084139 - 8 Apr 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2277
Abstract
The accurate segregation of sister chromatids is complex, and errors that arise throughout this process can drive chromosomal instability and tumorigenesis. We recently showed that methylglyoxal (MGO), a glycolytic by-product, can cause chromosome missegregation events in lymphocytes. However, the underlying mechanisms of this [...] Read more.
The accurate segregation of sister chromatids is complex, and errors that arise throughout this process can drive chromosomal instability and tumorigenesis. We recently showed that methylglyoxal (MGO), a glycolytic by-product, can cause chromosome missegregation events in lymphocytes. However, the underlying mechanisms of this were not explored. Therefore, in this study, we utilised shotgun proteomics to identify MGO-modified proteins, and label-free quantitation to measure changes in protein abundance following exposure to MGO. We identified numerous mitotic proteins that were modified by MGO, including those involved in the separation and cohesion of sister chromatids. Furthermore, the protein abundance of Securin, an inhibitor of sister chromatid separation, was increased following treatment with MGO. Cytological examination of chromosome spreads showed MGO prevented sister chromatid separation, which was associated with the formation of complex nuclear anomalies. Therefore, results from this study suggest MGO may drive chromosomal instability by preventing sister chromatid separation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Glycation in Food, Nutrition, Health and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 742 KiB  
Review
The Interplay of Cohesin and RNA Processing Factors: The Impact of Their Alterations on Genome Stability
by Michaela Osadska, Tomas Selicky, Miroslava Kretova, Jan Jurcik, Barbara Sivakova, Ingrid Cipakova and Lubos Cipak
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3939; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073939 - 1 Apr 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3531
Abstract
Cohesin, a multi-subunit protein complex, plays important roles in sister chromatid cohesion, DNA replication, chromatin organization, gene expression, transcription regulation, and the recombination or repair of DNA damage. Recently, several studies suggested that the functions of cohesin rely not only on cohesin-related protein–protein [...] Read more.
Cohesin, a multi-subunit protein complex, plays important roles in sister chromatid cohesion, DNA replication, chromatin organization, gene expression, transcription regulation, and the recombination or repair of DNA damage. Recently, several studies suggested that the functions of cohesin rely not only on cohesin-related protein–protein interactions, their post-translational modifications or specific DNA modifications, but that some RNA processing factors also play an important role in the regulation of cohesin functions. Therefore, the mutations and changes in the expression of cohesin subunits or alterations in the interactions between cohesin and RNA processing factors have been shown to have an impact on cohesion, the fidelity of chromosome segregation and, ultimately, on genome stability. In this review, we provide an overview of the cohesin complex and its role in chromosome segregation, highlight the causes and consequences of mutations and changes in the expression of cohesin subunits, and discuss the RNA processing factors that participate in the regulation of the processes involved in chromosome segregation. Overall, an understanding of the molecular determinants of the interplay between cohesin and RNA processing factors might help us to better understand the molecular mechanisms ensuring the integrity of the genome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Damage, Genomic Instability and Human Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1143 KiB  
Review
Integrating Sister Chromatid Cohesion Establishment to DNA Replication
by Caitlin M. Zuilkoski and Robert V. Skibbens
Genes 2022, 13(4), 625; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13040625 - 31 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3553
Abstract
The intersection through which two fundamental processes meet provides a unique vantage point from which to view cellular regulation. On the one hand, DNA replication is at the heart of cell division, generating duplicate chromosomes that allow each daughter cell to inherit a [...] Read more.
The intersection through which two fundamental processes meet provides a unique vantage point from which to view cellular regulation. On the one hand, DNA replication is at the heart of cell division, generating duplicate chromosomes that allow each daughter cell to inherit a complete copy of the parental genome. Among other factors, the PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) sliding clamp ensures processive DNA replication during S phase and is essential for cell viability. On the other hand, the process of chromosome segregation during M phase—an act that occurs long after DNA replication—is equally fundamental to a successful cell division. Eco1/Ctf7 ensures that chromosomes faithfully segregate during mitosis, but functions during DNA replication to activate cohesins and thereby establish cohesion between sister chromatids. To achieve this, Eco1 binds PCNA and numerous other DNA replication fork factors that include MCM helicase, Chl1 helicase, and the Rtt101-Mms1-Mms22 E3 ubiquitin ligase. Here, we review the multi-faceted coordination between cohesion establishment and DNA replication. SUMMARY STATEMENT: New findings provide important insights into the mechanisms through which DNA replication and the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion are coupled. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genome Maintenance and Cancer Predisposition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 637 KiB  
Review
Loss, Gain, and Retention: Mechanisms Driving Late Prophase I Chromosome Remodeling for Accurate Meiotic Chromosome Segregation
by Laura I. Láscarez-Lagunas, Marina Martinez-Garcia and Monica P. Colaiácovo
Genes 2022, 13(3), 546; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13030546 - 19 Mar 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3583
Abstract
To generate gametes, sexually reproducing organisms need to achieve a reduction in ploidy, via meiosis. Several mechanisms are set in place to ensure proper reductional chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division (MI), including chromosome remodeling during late prophase I. Chromosome remodeling after [...] Read more.
To generate gametes, sexually reproducing organisms need to achieve a reduction in ploidy, via meiosis. Several mechanisms are set in place to ensure proper reductional chromosome segregation at the first meiotic division (MI), including chromosome remodeling during late prophase I. Chromosome remodeling after crossover formation involves changes in chromosome condensation and restructuring, resulting in a compact bivalent, with sister kinetochores oriented to opposite poles, whose structure is crucial for localized loss of cohesion and accurate chromosome segregation. Here, we review the general processes involved in late prophase I chromosome remodeling, their regulation, and the strategies devised by different organisms to produce bivalents with configurations that promote accurate segregation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics of Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1727 KiB  
Review
DNA Repair in Space and Time: Safeguarding the Genome with the Cohesin Complex
by Jamie Phipps and Karine Dubrana
Genes 2022, 13(2), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13020198 - 22 Jan 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 6779
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a deleterious form of DNA damage, which must be robustly addressed to ensure genome stability. Defective repair can result in chromosome loss, point mutations, loss of heterozygosity or chromosomal rearrangements, which could lead to oncogenesis or cell death. [...] Read more.
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a deleterious form of DNA damage, which must be robustly addressed to ensure genome stability. Defective repair can result in chromosome loss, point mutations, loss of heterozygosity or chromosomal rearrangements, which could lead to oncogenesis or cell death. We explore the requirements for the successful repair of DNA DSBs by non-homologous end joining and homology-directed repair (HDR) mechanisms in relation to genome folding and dynamics. On the occurrence of a DSB, local and global chromatin composition and dynamics, as well as 3D genome organization and break localization within the nuclear space, influence how repair proceeds. The cohesin complex is increasingly implicated as a key regulator of the genome, influencing chromatin composition and dynamics, and crucially genome organization through folding chromosomes by an active loop extrusion mechanism, and maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Here, we consider how this complex is now emerging as a key player in the DNA damage response, influencing repair pathway choice and efficiency. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamics of DNA Double Strand Breaks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2438 KiB  
Review
The Interplay of Cohesin and the Replisome at Processive and Stressed DNA Replication Forks
by Janne J. M. van Schie and Job de Lange
Cells 2021, 10(12), 3455; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123455 - 8 Dec 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5973
Abstract
The cohesin complex facilitates faithful chromosome segregation by pairing the sister chromatids after DNA replication until mitosis. In addition, cohesin contributes to proficient and error-free DNA replication. Replisome progression and establishment of sister chromatid cohesion are intimately intertwined processes. Here, we review how [...] Read more.
The cohesin complex facilitates faithful chromosome segregation by pairing the sister chromatids after DNA replication until mitosis. In addition, cohesin contributes to proficient and error-free DNA replication. Replisome progression and establishment of sister chromatid cohesion are intimately intertwined processes. Here, we review how the key factors in DNA replication and cohesion establishment cooperate in unperturbed conditions and during DNA replication stress. We discuss the detailed molecular mechanisms of cohesin recruitment and the entrapment of replicated sister chromatids at the replisome, the subsequent stabilization of sister chromatid cohesion via SMC3 acetylation, as well as the role and regulation of cohesin in the response to DNA replication stress. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cohesin and Beyond: Its Role in Health and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 591 KiB  
Review
The Cohesin Complex and Its Interplay with Non-Coding RNAs
by Merve Kuru-Schors, Monika Haemmerle and Tony Gutschner
Non-Coding RNA 2021, 7(4), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna7040067 - 22 Oct 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 8617
Abstract
The cohesin complex is a multi-subunit protein complex initially discovered for its role in sister chromatid cohesion. However, cohesin also has several other functions and plays important roles in transcriptional regulation, DNA double strand break repair, and chromosome architecture thereby influencing gene expression [...] Read more.
The cohesin complex is a multi-subunit protein complex initially discovered for its role in sister chromatid cohesion. However, cohesin also has several other functions and plays important roles in transcriptional regulation, DNA double strand break repair, and chromosome architecture thereby influencing gene expression and development in organisms from yeast to man. While most of these functions rely on protein–protein interactions, post-translational protein, as well as DNA modifications, non-coding RNAs are emerging as additional players that facilitate and modulate the function or expression of cohesin and its individual components. This review provides a condensed overview about the architecture as well as the function of the cohesin complex and highlights its multifaceted interplay with both short and long non-coding RNAs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-coding RNA in Germany: Latest Advances and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2035 KiB  
Review
Flavors of Non-Random Meiotic Segregation of Autosomes and Sex Chromosomes
by Filip Pajpach, Tianyu Wu, Linda Shearwin-Whyatt, Keith Jones and Frank Grützner
Genes 2021, 12(9), 1338; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12091338 - 28 Aug 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4927
Abstract
Segregation of chromosomes is a multistep process occurring both at mitosis and meiosis to ensure that daughter cells receive a complete set of genetic information. Critical components in the chromosome segregation include centromeres, kinetochores, components of sister chromatid and homologous chromosomes cohesion, microtubule [...] Read more.
Segregation of chromosomes is a multistep process occurring both at mitosis and meiosis to ensure that daughter cells receive a complete set of genetic information. Critical components in the chromosome segregation include centromeres, kinetochores, components of sister chromatid and homologous chromosomes cohesion, microtubule organizing centres, and spindles. Based on the cytological work in the grasshopper Brachystola, it has been accepted for decades that segregation of homologs at meiosis is fundamentally random. This ensures that alleles on chromosomes have equal chance to be transmitted to progeny. At the same time mechanisms of meiotic drive and an increasing number of other examples of non-random segregation of autosomes and sex chromosomes provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of chromosome segregation but also question the textbook dogma of random chromosome segregation. Recent advances provide a better understanding of meiotic drive as a prominent force where cellular and chromosomal changes allow autosomes to bias their segregation. Less understood are mechanisms explaining observations that autosomal heteromorphism may cause biased segregation and regulate alternating segregation of multiple sex chromosome systems or translocation heterozygotes as an extreme case of non-random segregation. We speculate that molecular and cytological mechanisms of non-random segregation might be common in these cases and that there might be a continuous transition between random and non-random segregation which may play a role in the evolution of sexually antagonistic genes and sex chromosome evolution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sex Chromosome Evolution and Meiosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1207 KiB  
Review
Cohesin Mutations in Cancer: Emerging Therapeutic Targets
by Jisha Antony, Chue Vin Chin and Julia A. Horsfield
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(13), 6788; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136788 - 24 Jun 2021
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 8707
Abstract
The cohesin complex is crucial for mediating sister chromatid cohesion and for hierarchal three-dimensional organization of the genome. Mutations in cohesin genes are present in a range of cancers. Extensive research over the last few years has shown that cohesin mutations are key [...] Read more.
The cohesin complex is crucial for mediating sister chromatid cohesion and for hierarchal three-dimensional organization of the genome. Mutations in cohesin genes are present in a range of cancers. Extensive research over the last few years has shown that cohesin mutations are key events that contribute to neoplastic transformation. Cohesin is involved in a range of cellular processes; therefore, the impact of cohesin mutations in cancer is complex and can be cell context dependent. Candidate targets with therapeutic potential in cohesin mutant cells are emerging from functional studies. Here, we review emerging targets and pharmacological agents that have therapeutic potential in cohesin mutant cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Chromosomal Cohesion and Separation in Health and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop