Search Results (21)

Background/Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies worldwide and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative treatment. Over the past two decades, robotic-assisted surgery has emerged as an evolution of minimally invasive surgery, aiming to overcome several limitations of conventional laparoscopy. This narrative review summarizes the current state of the art of robotic surgery in CRC. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases, focusing on publications from 2015 to 2026. The review provides an overview of robotic platforms and summarizes the available clinical evidence. Priority was given to randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, large observational studies, and clinical practice guidelines. The review focuses on major commercially available robotic systems, including the da Vinci^®, Hugo™ RAS, and Versius^® platforms, as well as emerging robotic technologies. Results: Robotic colorectal surgery showed potentially favorable perioperative and oncological outcomes compared with laparoscopy. In rectal cancer, robotic approaches were associated with improved total mesorectal excision quality, lower conversion rates, and improved postoperative functional outcomes. Emerging evidence also suggested potential improvements in disease-free survival and local disease control following robotic rectal surgery. In colon cancer, robotic colectomy were associated with lower conversion rates, reduced blood loss, and faster postoperative recovery, with comparable long-term oncological outcomes. However, robotic procedures showed longer operative times and higher procedural costs. Conclusions: Robotic colorectal surgery appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive approach, particularly in rectal cancer surgery. The development of new robotic platforms and increasing market competition may improve cost sustainability and expand its future role in colorectal cancer management. Full article

Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation is increasingly preferred in spinal oncology for its physical properties, minimizing imaging artifacts and facilitating precise postoperative radiotherapy planning and tumor surveillance. However, a significant technical limitation exists: the current unavailability of dedicated CFR-PEEK pedicle screws for the cervical spine. The smallest available implants are designed for thoracic use (minimum diameter 4.5 mm, minimum length 25 mm), posing substantial risks of neurovascular injury when applied to smaller cervical pedicles. We present a technical note/feasibility report illustrated by a single case of robot-assisted placement of thoracic CFR-PEEK screws in the cervical spine for the treatment of a C7 Giant Cell Tumor. Following neoadjuvant therapy with Denosumab, a single-stage, two-step circumferential resection and reconstruction was performed. The anterior step was complicated by an iatrogenic injury to the highly adherent left vertebral artery (VA), which was successfully repaired. Consequently, the posterior step required maximal precision to preserve the sole remaining intact VA on the right side. Given the anatomical mismatch between the 4.5 mm thoracic screws and the narrow cervical pedicles (measuring as narrow as 3.2 mm on the critical right side), robotic navigation (ExcelsiusGPS^®) was utilized to plan and execute safe trajectories. Specifically, on the side of the intact VA, a small, controlled medial cortical violation was planned to avoid lateral vascular compromise. The procedure resulted in rigid, artifact-free stabilization with no immediate neurological sequelae. This single-case experience suggests that robotic guidance may facilitate adaptation of thoracic CFR-PEEK instrumentation to the cervical spine in selected oncologic scenarios; reproducibility, costs, and long-term outcomes remain uncertain. Full article

Background: The learning curve for robotic low anterior resection (LAR) utilizing the modern da Vinci Xi system within a high-volume, standardized environment remains poorly defined. This study aimed to delineate the technical proficiency of a single high-volume surgeon using the Xi platform. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 95 consecutive patients undergoing robotic LAR for primary rectal malignancy between 2020 and 2023 was conducted. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon using the da Vinci Xi system under a standardized ERAS protocol. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time was used to define learning phases. Results: CUSUM analysis identified a proficiency inflection point after 16 cases. Median docking time significantly decreased in the proficiency phase (14.5 vs. 10.0 min, p < 0.01). Notably, zero conversions to open surgery occurred throughout the series. Comparative analysis revealed comparable overall complication rates (0.0% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.201) and postoperative length of stay between phases. Short-term oncological quality, including lymph node yield and circumferential resection margins, remained satisfactory in both groups. Technical precision, reflected by consistently low robotic stapler firings (median 2.0), was maintained from the outset. Conclusions: Technical proficiency in robotic LAR using the da Vinci Xi system was rapidly achieved after approximately 16 cases in this high-volume standardized setting. This accelerated learning curve was not associated with compromised perioperative safety or oncological outcomes. Full article

Background: Stapled end-to-end anastomosis has a leakage rate close to 10%. Studies indicate that most leaks occur where stapler lines overlap. The single-stapled double purse-string suture technique (SIA) eliminates stapler line overlaps in low anterior resection (LAR) and may thereby decrease leakage rates. Methods: This single-arm, single-center study prospectively and consecutively registered all patients with sigmoid colonic cancer planned for robotic sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis over a two-year period. The primary outcome was time to perform SIA and secondary outcomes were total operative time and short-term complications. Results: The study group consisted of twenty-one patients. The median time to perform SIA was 11.5 min. Two patients (9.5%) experienced 30-day postoperative complications. One patient had ischemic bowels and pneumonia postoperatively and another had an anastomotic leakage grade C. Conclusions: This study has several limitations, including a small sample size, lack of comparator group, and short follow-up period. However, these preliminary results may indicate the SIA technique to be feasible without prolonging the operation substantially. Larger series are, however, evidently needed to evaluate the SIA technique in further detail to elucidate whether the technique is generalizable and safe. Full article

Objectives: Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) has emerged as a viable alternative to traditional median sternotomy for patients with anterior mediastinal tumors suspected of having thymoma or those with Myasthenia Gravis (MG). While median sternotomy remains a widely accepted standard approach, RATS has gained popularity due to its potential benefits. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our 5 years’ experience of performing 111 surgeries for patients with anterior mediastinal tumors and patients with MG suspected of having thymoma. We performed multivariate regression models to assess the association between main demographic and clinical variables and two primary outcomes: overall complications and hospital stay. Results: Out of 111 patients, 54 were men (48.6%) and 57 were women (51.4%). The majority of surgeries (n = 93) were performed by RATS (83.8%), while the remainder were performed by either median sternotomy (n = 15, 13.5%) or by other approaches (n = 3, 2.7%). Sixty-five patients were diagnosed with thymoma (58.6%), with 96.9% R0 resection. Sixty-five patients underwent left-sided surgery (58.6%), and thirty-one underwent right-sided surgery (27.9%). The conversion rate was 2.5%. The rate of postoperative complications was 8.1 without perioperative mortality. The median hospital stay was 4.62 days, but it was significantly shorter in the RATS compared to the median sternotomy group (mean 3.64 vs. 10.67 days, p = 0.040). Conclusions: Our results suggest that RATS for patients with anterior mediastinal tumors suspected of having thymoma or for those with MG is safe and technically feasible and may be the preferred surgical approach for selected patients, whereas traditional median sternotomy remains the preferred choice for more locally advanced tumors. Full article

Background: Indocyanine green (ICG)-guided surgery is an emerging technique to enhance intraoperative visualization of nodes and tumor location. However, there is no uniform protocol regarding the optimal timing, dosage, or injection site for ICG in colorectal cancer surgery. We assess the feasibility of ICG injection at the anorectal junction immediately before surgery to safely identify the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). Methods: This was a prospective study involving robotic left hemicolectomy or anterior resection of the rectum for primary colorectal cancer in 2024 in a single center. A total of 10–20 mg was injected into the anorectal submucosa at four quadrants circumferentially using an anoscope immediately before robot docking. Results: In this first study, ICG allowed us to identify the IMA in 84.6% of 26 patients (mean age 66.5 years; BMI 26.7 kg/m²), without intraoperative medical and surgical complications. Elevated BMI correlated with failure of IMA detection (r = −0.77, p < 0.001), despite high ICG doses trending toward improved vascular visualization (p = 0.097). A mean of 22 lymph nodes was harvested after ICG injection, with yields unaffected by the quality of IMA visualization. Conclusions: Submucosal injection of ICG is a feasible and easily adoptable option for early identification of the IMA, thereby preventing major vascular injuries, particularly in patients with challenging anatomy. A standardized protocol was implemented to improve reliability. Full article

Background: Dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is a key step for local clearance of periampullary cancers in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Since the 2000s, SMA-first approaches have gained popularity in open surgery to allow early vascular control and resectability assessment. With the rise of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), various SMA dissection techniques have been adapted to the robotic setting. Objective: To map current evidence on SMA dissection techniques in RPD and summarize technical variations. Eligibility Criteria and Sources of Evidence: A PubMed search identified 116 records. After title and abstract screening and full-text review, 27 studies focusing on SMA dissection for periampullary tumors in RPD with sufficient technical detail were included. Studies on open/laparoscopic PD, lacking technical description, or reporting duplicate techniques were excluded. Charting Methods: Data were charted based on the SMA approach type, surgical details, and institution. Results: Among the 27 included studies, multiple approaches were identified—anterior, right posterior, left posterior, uncinate, and mesenteric—each adapted to the robotic platform. Techniques varied in exposure, lymphadenectomy, and vessel control. Conclusions: This scoping review reveals diverse SMA dissection strategies in RPD. While technical innovation is progressing, further studies are warranted to standardize approaches and assess their oncologic and surgical outcomes. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Robotic surgery reduces the need for extensive surgical approaches and lowers perioperative complications. In particular, it offers enhanced dexterity, three-dimensional visualization, and improved precision in confined anatomical spaces. Pelvic masses pose significant challenges due to their close relationship with critical neurovascular structures, making traditional open or laparoscopic approaches more invasive and potentially riskier. Robot-assisted resection, combined with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, may therefore offer a safe and effective solution for the management of complex pelvic lesions. Case Presentation: An 18-year-old woman was incidentally diagnosed with an 11 cm asymptomatic pelvic mass located anterior to the sacrum. Initial differential diagnoses included neurofibroma, teratoma, and myelolipoma. Histopathological examination confirmed a ganglioneuroma. Following multidisciplinary discussion, the patient underwent a robot-assisted en bloc resection using the Da Vinci Xi multiport system. Preoperative planning was aided by 3D modeling and intraoperative navigation. Conclusions: Surgery lasted 322 min. Preoperative and postoperative eGFR values were 145.2 mL/min and 144.0 mL/min, respectively. The lesion measured 11 cm × 9 cm × 8 cm. The main intraoperative complication was a controlled breach of the iliac vein due to its close adherence to the mass. No major postoperative complications occurred (Clavien-Dindo Grade I). The drain was removed on postoperative day 3, and the bladder catheter on day 2. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without further complications. Presacral ganglioneuromas are rare neoplasms in a surgically complex area. A multidisciplinary approach using robotic-assisted laparoscopy with nerve monitoring enables safe, minimally invasive resection. This strategy may help avoid open surgery and reduce the risk of neurological and vascular injury. Full article

Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the gold standard for the resection of rectal cancer regardless of the modality: open, laparoscopic, or robotic. The transanal TME (TaTME) approach has been utilized to overcome the difficulties encountered with the dissection of tumors in the distal pelvis. Recently, a single-port robotic approach (rSPa) was introduced, where three arms and a camera emanate from a 2.5 cm diameter port. This report presents the first experience in the United States combining those two approaches (rSPa TaTME) in rectal cancer, evaluating its safety and oncologic outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective review of our prospectively maintained rectal cancer database. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant treatment, and oncologic and surgical outcomes were recorded. Results: Between May 2022 and August 2024, ten patients (six females, four males) with a median age at surgery of 53 years (range: 38–85) and a mean BMI of 26 (±5) kg/m² were included for analysis. The median distance of tumors from the anorectal junction was 3.2 cm (range: 2–5.3 cm). All patients had negative margins, with eight complete TME specimens, one near complete, and one incomplete. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 24 (±11). The average operative time was 351 (243–411) min. The average length of stay was four days. The ileostomy was reversed in nine out of ten patients. Six patients experienced complications within 30 days of surgery. There were no local or distal recurrences, with a mean follow-up of 20 months (range: 4–30). Conclusions: rSPa TaTME is a unique and innovative method of combining two minimally advanced approaches for the resection of distal rectal cancers, with acceptable surgical and oncologic outcomes. Full article

Background: Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer. However, its short-term outcomes and long-term oncological efficacy remain debated, especially in Western populations. This study evaluates the short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume European centres. Methods: This multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study included 1390 patients from the EUREKA collaborative dataset who underwent robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2022. All surgeries were performed by expert surgeons beyond the learning curve. Data were analysed for patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, pathological findings, and three-year survival metrics. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall and disease-free survival. Results: Of 1390 patients, 60.6% underwent restorative low anterior resection. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 3.7%, and postoperative complications were reported in 28.7%. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 14.7% of patients who underwent restorative low anterior resection. The median operative time was 223 min. R0 resection was achieved in 94.7%, and circumferential resection margin positivity was 5.5%. Three-year overall survival was 90.1%, disease-free survival was 88.6%, and local recurrence was 2.9%. Conclusions: Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision performed by experienced surgeons in high-volume European centres is safe, with low conversion rates, acceptable complication rates, and favourable oncological outcomes. These findings underscore the potential of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision as a standard approach for rectal cancer in specialised settings. Full article

Colorectal surgery is one of the specialties that have significantly benefited from the adoption of robotic technology. Over 20 years since the first robotic rectal resection, the Intuitive Surgical Da Vinci system remains the predominant platform. The introduction of new robotic systems into the market has enabled the first documented total mesorectal excision (TME) using alternative platforms. This scoping review aimed to assess the role and adoption of these emerging robotic systems in performing TME for rectal cancer surgery. Methods: A comprehensive search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted up to August 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Results: Thirty-six studies were included in the review. The majority of rectal surgical procedures were performed using eight different robotic platforms. Intraoperative, short-term, and functional outcomes were generally favorable. However, pathological results were frequently incomplete. Several studies identified the lack of advanced robotic instruments as a significant limitation. Conclusions: The quality of the resected specimen is critical in rectal cancer surgery. Although TME performed with new robotic platforms appears to be feasible and safe, the current body of literature is limited, particularly in the assessment of pathological and long-term survival outcomes. Full article

Background: DaVinci^® single-port (SP) robotic surgery offers several benefits compared to traditional multiport laparoscopic or robotic surgeries. One of the main advantages is that it allows for a minimally invasive approach, resulting in a single, smaller incision and reduced trauma to the patient’s body, leading to less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and reduced risk of complications. The cosmesis of a single port with minimal visible scarring is also an attractive aspect to the patients; however, many surgeons use an additional port for energy device, stapler use, and drain insertion. Pure single-port surgery with one incision is still rare. Here, we share our experience of our first 10 cases using the SP robotic platform in colorectal surgery. Methods: From May 2023 to December 2023, colorectal patients who underwent SP robotic surgery were analyzed. Placement of the incision was the umbilicus for eight patients, and right lower quadrant for two patients, through which ileostomy maturation was performed. Data on perioperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 4.6 months (range 0.6–7.4 months). Results: A total of 10 colorectal patients underwent DaVinci^® single-port robotic colorectal surgery at our institution during this period. The patient demographic was four males (40%) and six females (60%) with a median age of 63.5 years (range 50–75 years). Median body mass index (BMI) was 22.89 kg/m² (range 19.92–26.84 kg/m²). Nine patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, and one patient was diagnosed with a rectal gastrointestinal tumor. One patient underwent anterior resection and cholecystectomy simultaneously. Mean operation time was 222 min (range 142–316 min), and mean wound size was 3.25 cm (range 2.5–4.5 cm). Nine patients underwent surgery with single incision through which a single-port trocar was inserted, and one patient had one additional port for drain insertion. Mean hospital stay was 6 days (range 4–8 days) with one postoperative complication of bleeding requiring transfusion, but there was no readmission within 30 days. Conclusions: Overall, our experience with single-port robotic colorectal surgery has been promising. With only one patient with additional port for drain insertion, all nine patients underwent SP-robotic surgery with single incision for colon as well as rectal surgeries. Compared to an average postoperative length of stay of 6.5-8 days in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries reported in literature, SP-robotic surgery 33showed faster recovery of 6 days highlighting its benefits in patient recovery and satisfaction. Full article

Robotic surgery may offer significant advantages for treating extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Although laparoscopy has been shown to be safe and effective, laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) remains technically challenging and is still performed in selected centers. Robotic anterior resection (RAR) may overcome the drawback of conventional laparoscopy, providing high-quality surgery with favorable oncological outcomes. Moreover, recent data show how RAR offers clinical and oncological benefits when affording difficult TMEs, such as low and advanced rectal tumors, in terms of complication rate, specimen quality, recurrence rate, and survival. This series aims to review the most recent and relevant literature, reporting mid- and long-term oncological outcomes and focusing on minimally invasive RAR for low rectal cancer. Full article

(1) Background: Laparoscopic resection for colon and rectal cancer was introduced in the early 1990s; the aim of this analysis was to show possible advantages of minimal-invasive approaches in rectal cancer surgery. (2) Methods: From 2016 to 2020, all patients undergoing open, laparoscopic or robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery in Germany were retrospectively analyzed regarding sex distribution, conversion rates and in-hospital mortality rates according to nationwide hospital billing data based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). (3) Results: In total, 68,112 patients were analyzed, and most commonly, low anterior rectal resections with primary anastomosis (n = 25,824) were performed with an increase of minimal-invasive procedures over the years (open: 51% to 27%; laparoscopic: 47% to 63% and robotic: 2% to 10%). In-hospital mortality rate was 2.95% (n = 2012). In total, 4.61%, 1.77%, 1.14% and 3.95% of patients with open, laparoscopic, robotic and converted-to-open surgery died during hospital stay, respectively (open vs. laparoscopic p < 0.0001; open vs. robotic p < 0.00001; laparoscopic vs. robotic p = 0.001). Conversion rates were significantly more favorable in the robotic compared to the laparoscopic group. (11.94% vs. 2.53%; p < 0.0001). (4) Conclusion: Minimal-invasive rectal cancer surgery might have some advantages in terms of a reduced in-hospital mortality, and an improved conversion rate for the robotic approach. Full article

Introduction: Synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is gaining popularity. This case series describes our initial institutional experience. Methods: A retrospective study of synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer (March 2020 to December 2021). Results: Eight patients underwent synchronous robotic resections. The median age was 59 (45–72), and the median body mass index was 29 (20–33). Seven received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and five rectal cancers received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. One patient had a low anterior resection with major hepatectomy, two had low anterior resection with minor hepatectomy, and one had abdominoperineal resection with major hepatectomy. One patient had a left colectomy with minor hepatectomy, and two had right colectomies with minor hepatectomy. We used five robotic 8/12 mm ports in all cases. Extraction incisions were Pfannenstiel in four patients, colostomy site in two patients, one perineal incision, and one supra-umbilical incision. The median estimated blood loss was 200 mL (25–500), and the median operative time was 448 min (374–576). There were no intra-operative complications or conversions. Five patients had the liver resection first, and two of six anastomoses were performed before the liver resection. The Median length of stay was 4 days (3–14). There were two post-operative complications, prolonged ileus and DVT, with a Clavien-Dindo complication grade of I and II, respectively. There were no readmissions or reoperations. All colorectal and liver resection margins were negative. Conclusions: Synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resection can be performed effectively utilizing one port configuration with acceptable short-term outcomes and quality of oncologic resection. Full article