Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (88)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = revision total hip arthroplasty complications

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1014 KB  
Article
Microbiological Profiles of Patients with Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Undergoing Debridement, Antibiotics, Irrigation and Implant Retention (DAIR)
by Alberto Alfieri Zellner, Niclas Watzlawik, Jonas Roos, Gunnar Thorben Rembert Hischebeth, Ernst Molitor, Alexander Franz and Frank Sebastian Fröschen
Antibiotics 2025, 14(9), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14090873 (registering DOI) - 30 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications following total joint arthroplasty. The debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure is commonly employed to treat acute, early-stage infections, but its success is highly variable, influenced by factors [...] Read more.
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications following total joint arthroplasty. The debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure is commonly employed to treat acute, early-stage infections, but its success is highly variable, influenced by factors such as pathogen virulence and antibiotic susceptibility profiles. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pathogens responsible for these infections on the outcome of DAIR. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed the microbiological profiles of 116 patients (66 hips and 50 knees) treated for acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) with DAIR between 2018 and 2022. Acute PJI was defined as a duration of symptom less than three weeks, according to the criteria established by the Tsukayama and Izakovicova classification. Preoperative joint aspirations, intraoperatively collected tissue samples, and sonication of the exchanged mobile parts were analyzed for each case. We differentiated between monomicrobial PJI, polymicrobial PJI (defined as the identification of more than one microorganism from preoperative joint fluid aspiration or intraoperative samples), and difficult-to-treat (DTT) pathogens. Results: In this cohort, the following pathogen profiles were identified: culture-negative cases accounted for 11.1% of infections, while 64.2% were attributed to Gram-positive bacteria, 19.8% to Gram-negative bacteria, and 4.9% to fungal pathogens. Among the identified microorganisms, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were the most frequently detected, exhibiting a notable oxacillin resistance rate of 52.9% and rifampicin resistance rate of 28.7%. Additionally, no significant difference in revision-free implant survival was found between patients with DTT pathogens and/or polymicrobial PJI and those without such infections. Conclusions: This study highlights that pathogens in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) do not solely determine outcomes, as patient-specific factors (comorbidities, implant type) may also play a key role. Regional variations in pathogens and antibiotic resistance patterns should guide empirical therapy. For instance, this study found a high reliance on vancomycin due to high oxacillin resistance in CNS, the most frequent causative pathogen. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Orthopedic Infections: Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 875 KB  
Article
Comparison of Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered, Fluted, Modular Titanium Stem System
by Federico De Meo, Giorgio Cacciola, Francesco Bosco, Antongiulio Bruschetta and Pietro Cavaliere
Prosthesis 2025, 7(5), 104; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7050104 - 22 Aug 2025
Viewed by 412
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Tapered, fluted, modular titanium stems (TFTSs) are widely used in complex femoral reconstructions during total hip arthroplasty (THA), but evidence regarding the clinical performance of specific modular implant designs remains limited. This study aimed to compare the early clinical and radiographic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Tapered, fluted, modular titanium stems (TFTSs) are widely used in complex femoral reconstructions during total hip arthroplasty (THA), but evidence regarding the clinical performance of specific modular implant designs remains limited. This study aimed to compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of complex primary and revision THA using the M-Vizion® modular stem system. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 109 patients (46 complex primary and 63 revision THA cases) treated with the M-Vizion® cementless modular TFTSs between 2020 and 2023. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) at 1- and 2-years post-surgery. Radiographic evaluation included stem subsidence, radiolucent lines, heterotopic ossification, and complications. Clinically relevant subsidence was defined as >5 mm. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA. Results: The mean follow-up was 33.3 months for complex primary and 31.8 months for revision THA. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in FJS over time (p < 0.05). In the revision group, HOOS improved significantly from baseline to follow-up (p < 0.001). Mean stem subsidence was 2.1 mm in the complex primary group and 1.8 mm in the revision group; nine patients (8.3%) had subsidence greater than 5 mm. No cases of aseptic loosening or stem fracture were observed. The overall complication rate was low, with dislocations (3.2%) and infections (2.8%) requiring revision. Conclusions: The M-Vizion® TFTS system demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes in both complex primary and revision THA. These findings suggest potential utility in complex femoral reconstruction, although confirmation through longer-term studies is warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics and Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 762 KB  
Article
Does a Dual-Mobility Cup Offer Better Stability than Conventional Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty Following Femoral Neck Fracture?
by Itay Ron, Itay Ashkenazi, Nimrod Snir, Yaniv Warschawski and Aviram Gold
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(16), 5613; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165613 - 8 Aug 2025
Viewed by 363
Abstract
Introduction: Instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a challenging complication. Dual-mobility (DM) hip components are aimed at improving joint stability by increasing the head-neck ratio and jump distance. However, data regarding the efficacy of these implants in the trauma setting are scarce. [...] Read more.
Introduction: Instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a challenging complication. Dual-mobility (DM) hip components are aimed at improving joint stability by increasing the head-neck ratio and jump distance. However, data regarding the efficacy of these implants in the trauma setting are scarce. This study aimed to compare the dislocation rates of DM bearings with conventional THA in patients undergoing primary THA for the treatment of hip fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent THA for hip fractures between the years 2010–2022 and had a minimum follow-up of two years. Patient demographics and radiographic parameters, including cup version, leg length discrepancy (LLD) and femoral horizontal offset, were compared between patients who received DM bearings and patients who received conventional THA. Dislocation and revision surgery rates were also compared between the groups. Results: The study included 570 patients who met inclusion criteria, of which 82 patients were in the DM bearings group and 488 patients were in the conventional THA group. Baseline demographics and comorbidity profiles were comparable between the groups. Cup anteversion was significantly lower in the DM group (11.1° vs. 14.1°; p = 0.006), while no significant differences were observed in LLD nor femoral offset between the groups (p = 0.38, p = 0.69, respectively). Dislocation rates were similar between the DM and conventional THA groups (1.2% vs. 1.02%, respectively; p = 0.54). Furthermore, revision rates were similar between DM and conventional THA (1.22% vs. 2.87%, respectively; p = 0.387). Conclusions: While no significant differences in dislocation rates were observed between dual-mobility and conventional THA bearings, the significantly lower cup anteversion suggests a potential improvement in acetabular safe zone positioning, this could reflect a broader margin for error in implant positioning. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the biomechanical advantages of DM bearings in patients with hip fractures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hip Fracture and Surgery: Clinical Updates and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3512 KB  
Article
Cumulative Risk for Periprosthetic Fracture and Operative Treatment Options After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Modular and Tapered Revision Device—A Consecutive Series of 117 Cases in a Mid-Term Duration
by Oliver E. Bischel, Matthias K. Jung, Max Pilgrim, Arnold J. Höppchen, Paul M. Böhm and Jörn B. Seeger
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5321; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155321 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 451
Abstract
Background: Implantation of modularly built-up stems with a tapered and fluted design is currently state of the art in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). Nevertheless, implant-specific major complications like breakage of taper junctions as well as periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) may lead to failure [...] Read more.
Background: Implantation of modularly built-up stems with a tapered and fluted design is currently state of the art in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). Nevertheless, implant-specific major complications like breakage of taper junctions as well as periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) may lead to failure of reconstruction during follow-up. Methods: A cohort of 117 cases receiving femoral RTHA by a modular stem was investigated retrospectively with a mean follow-up of 5.7 (0.5–13.7) years. Cumulative risk and potential factors affecting the occurrence of PPFs were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method. In addition, cases were presented to discuss operative treatment options. Results: A cumulative risk of PPF of 12.1% (95% CI: 0–24.6%) was calculated at 13.7 years. Female patients had significantly higher risk compared to male patients (0% after 13.5 years for male patients vs. 20.8% (95% CI: 0.5–41.2%) after 13.7 years for female patients; log-rank p = 0.0438) as all five patients sustaining a PPF during follow-up were women. Four fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Non-union and collapse of the fracture occurred in one patient after closed reduction and internal fixation. Conclusions: Postoperative PPF after femoral revision with a modular stem has shown to be a frequent complication within this mid-term follow-up. Female patients were at a significantly higher risk in this aged cohort, indicating osteoporosis as a risk factor. The surgical treatment of PPF with an integrated long-stemmed prosthesis is challenging and thorough considerations of adequate operative treatment of PPFs are strongly advised in order to limit complication rates. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 833 KB  
Case Report
Gait Training with a Dislocated Hip Spacer: A Case Study and Literature Review
by Stefano Salvaderi, Valentina Liquori, Giovanni Zatti, Giorgio Ferriero, Francesco Negrini, Calogero Malfitano, Ludovit Salgovic and Paola Emilia Ferrara
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5316; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155316 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 408
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Spacer dislocation is among the most frequent mechanical complications after revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection. Spacer dislocations may be managed conservatively, but there are no guidelines on the rehabilitation of these patients, and the restriction of weight bearing is [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Spacer dislocation is among the most frequent mechanical complications after revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection. Spacer dislocations may be managed conservatively, but there are no guidelines on the rehabilitation of these patients, and the restriction of weight bearing is still under debate. Methods: We first report the case of a patient with hip spacer cranial dislocation, judged unfit to be surgically treated once more for a medium period, who started a rehabilitation program with partial weight bearing. Results: After two weeks of inpatient rehabilitation, the patient started to maintain the standing position with partial weight bearing on the affected side. Following hospital discharge we continued rehabilitation in the outpatient clinic. Despite the finding of the denervation of the ipsilateral quadriceps, three months after admission, she was able to walk for short distances using a walker, initially with the help of a therapist and then with supervision. About one year later, she was able to undergo the reimplantation of the definitive prosthesis. Conclusions: Despite the spacer dislocation, walking short distances is a feasible goal, even with assistance, wearing a brace and using a walker. Future research is needed to confirm and expand upon this observation and to understand the mechanisms underlying the development of neurological complications to implement effective prevention strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 579 KB  
Article
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Superinfection with a Difficult-to-Treat Pathogen in Periprosthetic Joint Infections
by Ali Darwich, Tobias Baumgärtner, Svetlana Hetjens, Sascha Gravius and Mohamad Bdeir
Antibiotics 2025, 14(8), 752; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14080752 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 417
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are considered as one of the most serious complications after total joint arthroplasty. Aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of PJI caused by difficult-to-treat (DTT) pathogens as well as PJIs with a superinfection with a [...] Read more.
Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are considered as one of the most serious complications after total joint arthroplasty. Aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of PJI caused by difficult-to-treat (DTT) pathogens as well as PJIs with a superinfection with a DTT pathogen in the course of the infection and assess the risk factors leading to this emergence. Methods: Data of 169 consecutive patients with a PJI was analyzed in this retrospective observational single-center study, and cases were categorized into PJIs with initial DTT pathogens, PJIs with DTT pathogen superinfection, non-DTT PJIs, and PJIs with superinfection. Recorded parameters comprised age, gender, side, body mass index (BMI), preoperative anticoagulation, and serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP) at admission, as well as preoperative patient status using the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score and the age-adjusted form of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Furthermore, the infecting microorganism and the type of infection as well as the chosen operative treatment regime, duration of the antibiotics interval, and the outcome were recorded. Results: In total, 46.2% of cases were DTT PJIs, and 30.8% of them were superinfections. Elevated serum CRP levels at admission (≥92.1 mg/L) were linked to a nearly 7-fold increased likelihood of a DTT PJI (OR 6.981, CI [1.367–35.63], p = 0.001), compared to patients with a non-DTT PJI. Hip joint involvement was also associated with a 3.5-fold higher risk compared to knee joints (OR 3.478, CI [0.361–33.538], p = 0.0225). Furthermore, patients undergoing ≥3 revision surgeries demonstrated a significantly 1.3-fold increased risk of developing a DTT superinfection (OR 1.288, CI [1.100–1.508], p < 0.0001). Chronic PJIs were similarly associated with a markedly 3.5-fold higher likelihood of superinfection by DTT pathogens (OR 3.449, CI [1.159–10.262], p = 0.0387). Remaining parameters did not significantly affect the rate of a DTT PJI or a PJI with DTT superinfection. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of early identification of high-risk patients and highlight the need for tailored preventive and therapeutic strategies in managing DTT PJIs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2631 KB  
Systematic Review
Are There Benefits of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Dual-Mobility Cups Compared to Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Geriatric Population? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
by Dimitrios Grammatikopoulos, Vasileios F. Pegios, Stavros Tsotsolis, Eustathios Kenanidis and Eleftherios Tsiridis
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5076; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145076 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 537
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The optimal treatment for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in the elderly remains unclear. Internal fixation, bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BH), standard total hip arthroplasty (THA), or dual mobility (DM-THA) cups have been employed, each presenting various advantages and disadvantages. This systematic review [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The optimal treatment for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in the elderly remains unclear. Internal fixation, bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BH), standard total hip arthroplasty (THA), or dual mobility (DM-THA) cups have been employed, each presenting various advantages and disadvantages. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated comparative studies of BH and DM-THA in FNFs among the elderly, aiming to ascertain differences in outcomes, including functional recovery, patient-reported outcome measures, implant survival, complications, and mortality rates. Methods: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines with a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD420251065762). A comprehensive search of electronic databases and grey literature included only comparative studies of BH and DM-THA in patients over 65 years with FNFs. Results: Sixteen studies were eligible, comprising four randomised controlled trials and twelve retrospective comparative studies involving 11,460 patients (10,036 BH; 1424 DM-THA). Patients with DM-THA exhibited a higher postoperative Harris Hip Score (4.55, p < 0.0001), alongside a lower dislocation risk ([OR] 2.77, p < 0.0001), a reduced revision rate ([OR] 2.36, p < 0.0001), and decreased mortality ([OR] 1.94, p < 0.0001). The operative time was somewhat longer in the DM-THA group, by 12.71 min, and blood loss was greater by 121 mL, indicating significant heterogeneity across the studies. Conclusions: DM-THA for FNFs in elderly patients results in improved functional recovery and lower dislocation, reoperation, and mortality risk. However, longer operative times and increased blood loss remain significant considerations. Further, well-designed comparative studies are required to evaluate overall cost-effectiveness and define the optimal age threshold, beyond which the limitations of DM-THA may outweigh its benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The “Orthogeriatric Fracture Syndrome”—Issues and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 6645 KB  
Review
Iliac Stemmed Cups: A Review of History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes in Revision Hip Arthroplasty and Primary Severe Dysplasia
by Pier Giorgio Vasina, Paolo Palumbi, Ideal Frakulli, Christos Christoforidis, Claudio D’Agostino, Alberto Di Martino and Cesare Faldini
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4955; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144955 - 13 Jul 2025
Viewed by 480
Abstract
Background: The increasing incidence of revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs), particularly due to failure of the acetabular components and severe bone loss, necessitates reliable surgical solutions. Iliac stemmed cups (ISCs) have emerged as effective options for managing complex pelvic defects, including Paprosky type [...] Read more.
Background: The increasing incidence of revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs), particularly due to failure of the acetabular components and severe bone loss, necessitates reliable surgical solutions. Iliac stemmed cups (ISCs) have emerged as effective options for managing complex pelvic defects, including Paprosky type 3A and 3B acetabular defects, severe developmental dysplasia, and selected pelvic discontinuities. This review examines the historical evolution, clinical indications, and outcomes associated with ISCs. Methods: This narrative review analyzed the historical and recent literature concerning various ISC designs. We critically assessed clinical outcomes, complication rates, and implant survival from 13 key studies. Results: ISCs have progressed significantly from initial monobloc designs to contemporary modular configurations, substantially enhancing surgical versatility and biomechanical stability. Clinical outcomes varied with reported complications such as infection, dislocation, mechanical failure, and aseptic loosening ranging from 10% to over 30%. Newer modular implants like the Sansone cup have demonstrated improved outcomes, with complication rates below 10% and five-year survival rates exceeding 95%. Conclusions: ISCs are reliable and versatile implants, particularly suited to address significant pelvic bone deficiencies. Optimal surgical techniques and careful implant selection remain essential to minimize complications and achieve favorable long-term functional outcomes, making these implants valuable tools in complex hip arthroplasty. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Approaches in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 919 KB  
Article
Use of Bone Bank Grafts in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Patient Characteristics at a Referral Center
by Thiago de Carvalho Gontijo, Luiz Octávio Pereira Xavier, Lucas Carneiro Morais, Gustavo Waldolato Silva, Janaíne Cunha Polese, Raquel Bandeira da Silva and Amanda Aparecida Oliveira Leopoldino
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1246; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071246 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 305
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To characterize the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using bone allografts from a tissue bank, and to identify clinical and surgical factors associated with the selection of graft type in cases of severe periprosthetic [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: To characterize the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using bone allografts from a tissue bank, and to identify clinical and surgical factors associated with the selection of graft type in cases of severe periprosthetic bone loss. Materials and Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study involved a retrospective review of medical records from a specialized referral center, including revision THA procedures performed between 2013 and 2019. Data were collected on 36 variables covering demographic details (age, sex), surgical history of both hips, comorbidities, medication use, perioperative complications, hospitalization, surgical technique, and characteristics of the bone grafts used. Patients were grouped based on the type of allograft received—structured or morselized (impacted)—and comparative analyses were performed. Results: A total of 67 revision THA cases were evaluated, with a mean patient age of 63.2 years. Nearly half (47.8%) had no prior hip revision. The average number of previous procedures per patient was 1.73, and the mean interval from primary THA to revision was 178.4 months. Morselized bone allografts were used in 66.7% of cases, and structured allografts in 33.3%. Patients receiving structured grafts had undergone a significantly higher number of prior surgeries (p = 0.01) and had a longer duration since the initial THA (p = 0.04). Conclusions: These findings suggest that younger patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty may be at increased risk for complex revision procedures involving structured grafts later in life, underscoring the need for long-term monitoring and tailored surgical planning in this population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Techniques, Risks and Recovery of Hip Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 687 KB  
Review
Management of Clamshell Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Rarely Recognized Periprosthetic Injury Pattern
by Felix Haussner, Michael Fuchs, Moritz Oltmanns, Heiko Reichel and Tobias Freitag
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4896; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144896 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 340
Abstract
Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs) represent the third most frequent indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Given the steadily increasing number of primary hip replacements, this complication is gaining growing attention among orthopedic surgeons. Clamshell fracture (CF) constitutes a particularly controversial and underrecognized [...] Read more.
Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs) represent the third most frequent indication for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Given the steadily increasing number of primary hip replacements, this complication is gaining growing attention among orthopedic surgeons. Clamshell fracture (CF) constitutes a particularly controversial and underrecognized fracture pattern that, for a long time, was not accounted for in the commonly used classification systems for PPFFs. Recent studies suggest that the incidence and clinical relevance of these injury patterns have been underestimated. Therapeutic options are manifold and depend on various patient-specific factors as well as stem stability. Despite this, the current literature remains limited, and standardized therapeutic approaches are still poorly defined. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of clamshell fractures as a distinct pattern of periprosthetic injuries. Furthermore, relevant treatment options dependent on biomechanical considerations will be outlined and discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Joint Arthroplasty)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1733 KB  
Article
Towards an Automated Computational Workflow to Assess Primary Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty
by Massimiliano Mercuri, Enrico Toccaceli, Xiaoshu Sun, Giuseppe Marongiu, Marco Viceconti, Antonino Amedeo La Mattina and Cristina Curreli
Bioengineering 2025, 12(7), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12070723 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 468
Abstract
Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most common and rapidly growing surgical procedures, with over one million cases performed annually in the United States. Despite high success rates, revision surgeries remain a significant concern due to complications such as aseptic loosening, often [...] Read more.
Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most common and rapidly growing surgical procedures, with over one million cases performed annually in the United States. Despite high success rates, revision surgeries remain a significant concern due to complications such as aseptic loosening, often resulting from inadequate primary implant stability. This study presents an automated computational framework that integrates three-dimensional preoperative planning and finite element modeling to predict the primary stability of hip implants. Data obtained from the virtual surgery phase are used to generate subject-specific finite element models, which are executed on high-performance computing systems. The simulation evaluates implant stability by analyzing the contact interaction between the bone and the implant. The pipeline is demonstrated using data from the open-source HFValid collection and a commercial implant. Automation substantially reduced the time required to set up simulations, improving the efficiency on high-performance infrastructure. This integrated computational approach bridges the gap between biomechanical modeling and clinical decision-making and can serve as a preclinical tool for identifying personalized implant strategies and for conducting large-scale virtual cohort studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic Tools and Therapeutic Strategies for Hip Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 514 KB  
Article
Comparison of Microbiological Profiles of Primary Hip and Knee Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated at Specialist Centers Around the World
by Emin Suha Dedeogullari, Pablo Slullitel, Isabel Horton, Bulent Atilla, Saif Salih, Paul Monk, Ahmet Mazhar Tokgozoglu, Michael Goplen, Bonita Tsang, Martin Buljubasich, Hesham Abdelbary, Simon Garceau and George Grammatopoulos
Microorganisms 2025, 13(7), 1505; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071505 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 535
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complex complication of total joint arthroplasty, with microbiological profiles varying across centers worldwide. However, most studies are limited to single-center or intra-country multicenter analyses, often including mixed cohorts of primary and revision PJI cases, with limited data [...] Read more.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complex complication of total joint arthroplasty, with microbiological profiles varying across centers worldwide. However, most studies are limited to single-center or intra-country multicenter analyses, often including mixed cohorts of primary and revision PJI cases, with limited data regarding global antibiotic resistance patterns. This study compared the microbiological characteristics, polymicrobial culture rates, prevalence of culture-negative infections, and antibiotic resistance patterns in PJI cases across five referral centers from five continents. A total of 717 patients with primary hip and knee PJI were included from centers in Argentina, Canada, Turkey, England, and New Zealand. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the most common pathogens (48.5%, p < 0.01). Culture-negative infection rates varied significantly, ranging from 4.2% (England) to 24.6% (Turkey) (p < 0.01). Polymicrobial infections were the most frequent in Canada (8.9%) and the least frequent in England (1.1%) (p < 0.01). Gram-negative bacteria comprised 13.1% of culture-positive cases, with no significant intercountry difference. Multidrug resistance was observed in all centers, ranging from 23.7% (Argentina) to 43.1% (Turkey), with no statistical significance. Vancomycin resistance was detected in England (2.3%) and Canada (1.2%) but absent in Turkey, New Zealand, and Argentina. These findings underscore significant intercontinental variability, emphasizing the need for regional considerations in regards to empiric antibiotic selection and PJI management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Microbial Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1096 KB  
Article
Short-Term Outcomes of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a 3D-Printed Acetabular Cup Manufactured by Directed Energy Deposition: A Prospective Observational Study
by Ji Hoon Bahk, Woo-Lam Jo, Kee-Haeng Lee, Joo-Hyoun Song, Seung-Chan Kim and Young Wook Lim
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4527; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134527 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 577
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the production of cementless acetabular cups with porous surfaces that facilitate early osseointegration. Directed energy deposition (DED), a form of AM, allows the direct welding of porous structures onto metal substrates without requiring a vacuum environment, offering [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the production of cementless acetabular cups with porous surfaces that facilitate early osseointegration. Directed energy deposition (DED), a form of AM, allows the direct welding of porous structures onto metal substrates without requiring a vacuum environment, offering advantages over conventional powder bed fusion methods. Despite growing interest in DED, no prospective clinical studies evaluating DED-based acetabular components have been published to date. This study assessed short-term outcomes of a DED-based 3D-printed acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: A total of 120 patients who underwent primary cementless THA using the Corentec Mirabo Z® acetabular cup were prospectively enrolled. Among them, 124 hips from 100 patients who had completed a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were included in the analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS), WOMAC, EQ-5D-5L, and pain NRS. Radiographic evaluation included measurements of cup position, osseointegration, and detection of interfacial or polar gaps on CT and plain radiographs. Implant-related complications were also recorded. Results: At a mean follow-up of 34.6 months, the implant survival rate was 99.3%, with one revision due to suspected osseointegration failure. The HHS improved from 56.6 to 91.4 at 24 months, and the NRS decreased from 6.2 to 1.1 (both p < 0.001). Interfacial gaps were observed in 58.1% of cases on CT, though most were <1 mm and not clinically significant. Common postoperative issues included greater trochanteric pain syndrome, squeaking, and iliotibial band tightness, all of which were resolved with conservative treatment. Conclusions: DED-based 3D-printed acetabular cups demonstrated favorable short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, with high survivorship and reliable early osseointegration in cementless THA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1233 KB  
Article
Risk Factors in Patients Who Had Prior Renal or Liver Transplant Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
by Vikram S. Gill, Sayi P. Boddu, Elie Mansour, Bassam G. Abu Jawdeh, Muhammad Ali Khan, Alyssa McGary, Henry Clarke, Mark Spangehl, Matthew P. Abdel, Cameron K. Ledford and Joshua S. Bingham
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3486; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103486 - 16 May 2025
Viewed by 507
Abstract
Background: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are living longer and, consequently, more of them require elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) to restore mobility and improve quality of life. Because these patients are chronically immunosuppressed and often burdened by multiple comorbidities, their peri-operative risk [...] Read more.
Background: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are living longer and, consequently, more of them require elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) to restore mobility and improve quality of life. Because these patients are chronically immunosuppressed and often burdened by multiple comorbidities, their peri-operative risk profile may differ substantially from that of the general THA population. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with acute medical and surgical complications, implant survivorship, and overall mortality in patients with a history of SOT who underwent THA. Methods: A total of 173 THA procedures were reviewed in patients with previous SOT. Among them, 64 had undergone liver transplantation (LT), 83 had received renal transplants (RT), and 26 had experienced more than one type of organ transplant (MT). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was employed to estimate median survival. Complications were examined using univariate analysis through mixed-effects logistic regression, while Cox regression was utilized to assess mortality risk. The median follow-up period extended to 99 months. Results: The proportion of patients experiencing at least one acute medical event was 27% in the LT group, 33% in the RT group, and 38% in the MT group, with no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.5). American Society of Anesthesiologists Class (ASA) 4 (Odds Ratio (OR) = 28; p = 0.006) and treatment with bisphosphonates (OR = 2.25; p = 0.03) were associated with higher risk of acute medical complications. Increased age at the time of SOT was linked to a reduced likelihood of surgical complications (OR = 0.94, p = 0.008), as was older age at the time of undergoing THA (OR = 0.92, p = 0.001). The observed rates of reoperation and implant revision were 3% and 1%, respectively. The estimated patient survivorship rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 98.6, 82, and 58.4%, respectively. Older age at SOT (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.06, p < 0.001), at THA (HR = 1.08, p < 0.001), ASA 4 at THA (HR = 7.57, p = 0.02), and atrial fibrillation (AFib) (HR = 3.13, p = 0.02) were associated with higher mortality. Conclusions: ASA 4 and bisphosphonates were associated with a higher risk of acute medical complications, whereas older age was associated with lower surgical complications. Additionally, older age, ASA 4, and AFib were associated with higher mortality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1428 KB  
Article
The PJI-TNM Classification as Predictor for Revision-Free Implant Survival Rates in Patients with Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip or Knee Joint
by Frank Sebastian Fröschen, Lisa Greber, Ernst Molitor, Gunnar Thorben Rembert Hischebeth, Alexander Franz and Thomas Martin Randau
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17(3), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17030054 - 15 May 2025
Viewed by 554
Abstract
Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain a major challenge in arthroplasty. This study tries to evaluate the PJI-TNM classification as predictor for the revision-free implant survival in patients with PJI of the hip or knee joint. Methods: To this end, we perform a [...] Read more.
Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain a major challenge in arthroplasty. This study tries to evaluate the PJI-TNM classification as predictor for the revision-free implant survival in patients with PJI of the hip or knee joint. Methods: To this end, we perform a retrospective study of all consecutive patients with PJI of an inlying hip or knee arthroplasty between January 2015 and December 2019. Results: A total of 443 cases (hip: n = 247; knee n = 196) were identified. In total, 439 patients underwent surgery (DAIR: n = 138 cases (31%), explantation: n = 272 (61%), irrigation with debridement without exchange of implant components: n = 29 (6.5%)). Four patients refused surgical treatment and 39.5% were lost to follow-up. In total, 78 patients died during follow-up and 27 deaths were directly related to PJI/complications during treatment. Patients with inlying “standard”-implants (p < 0.001) and without previous history of PJI (p = 0.002) displayed a significantly higher postoperative revision-free implant survival. In terms of the PJI-TNM subclassification, patients with loosened implants but without soft-tissue defects (T1) displayed the highest revision-free implant survival. In contrast, patients classified as M3 (no surgical treatment possible) displayed an inferior outcome compared to M0, M1, or M2. Patients with different N-subclassifications (“non-human cells”/causative pathogen) did not display differences in revision-free implant survival. Conclusions: The PJI-TNM classification is well suited to classify PJIs. Its complexity allows for more than 500 different combinations of classifications. Further validation data are needed, but to us, the PJI-TNM classification seems to offer the possibility of comparing patients with PJIs. It may, therefore, be a very valuable tool in order to compare cohorts with PJIs and provide individual data for patient specific outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop