Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (80)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = radiotherapy-related adverse effects

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 13597 KiB  
Systematic Review
Current Research Trends and Hotspots in Radiotherapy Combined with Nanomaterials for Cancer Treatment: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis
by Muyasha Abulimiti, Shiqin Dai, Ebara Mitsuhiro, Yu Sugawara, Yinuo Li, Hideyuki Sakurai and Yoshitaka Matsumoto
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(15), 1205; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15151205 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
This study investigated the evolving trends, current research hotspots, and future directions of radiotherapy combined with nanobiomaterials through a bibliometric analysis. Publications related to nanobiomaterials used in radiotherapy between 2004 and 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database and [...] Read more.
This study investigated the evolving trends, current research hotspots, and future directions of radiotherapy combined with nanobiomaterials through a bibliometric analysis. Publications related to nanobiomaterials used in radiotherapy between 2004 and 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database and analyzed using VOSviewer, R, and CiteSpace. China emerged as the leading contributor, accounting for 1051 publications (50.41%), followed by the USA. Liu Zhuang is the most productive author in this field. American Chemical Society (ACS) Nano published the most influential articles and accumulated the highest number of citations. Advanced Targeted Therapies in Cancer: Drug Nanocarriers, the Future of Chemotherapy was the most cited, with 1255 citations. Citation bursts have revealed emerging research trends in targeted delivery, cellular studies, co-delivery strategies, immunogenic cell death, polymeric nanoparticles, tumor research, and drug delivery systems, indicating potential avenues for future research. Over the past two decades, nanomaterials for radiotherapy have gained substantial attention. Key areas of focus include enhancing the efficacy of radiotherapy, achieving targeted drug delivery, minimizing adverse effects, and integrating nanomaterials with other therapeutic modalities. Future investigations are expected to improve the precision of radiotherapy, augment radiation effects, and optimize the tumor microenvironment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 946 KiB  
Review
Long-Term Adverse Events Following Early Breast Cancer Treatment with a Focus on the BRCA-Mutated Population
by Berta Obispo, Caroline Bailleux, Blanca Cantos, Pilar Zamora, Sachin R. Jhawar, Jajini Varghese, Lucia Cabal-Hierro, Paulo Luz, Luis Berrocal-Almanza and Xiaoqing Xu
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2506; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152506 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 477
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Despite most cases being diagnosed in the early stages, patients typically require a multimodal treatment approach. This typically involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments (including chemotherapy or immunotherapy), targeted therapy, [...] Read more.
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Despite most cases being diagnosed in the early stages, patients typically require a multimodal treatment approach. This typically involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments (including chemotherapy or immunotherapy), targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, depending on the disease subtype and the risk of recurrence. Moreover, patients with BC and germline mutations in the breast cancer genes 1 or 2 (BRCA1/BRCA2), (gBRCAm), who are typically young women, often require more aggressive therapeutic interventions. These mutations present unique characteristics that necessitate a distinct treatment approach, potentially influencing the side effect profiles of patients with BC. Regardless of the clear benefit observed with these treatments in terms of reduced recurrence and mortality rates, long-term, treatment-related adverse events occur that negatively affect the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of BC survivors. Thus, long-term adverse events need to be factored into the treatment decision algorithm of patients with early BC (eBC). Physical, functional, emotional, and psychosocial adverse events can occur and represent a significant concern and a challenge for clinicians, patients, and their families. This review article provides an overview of the various long-term adverse events that patients with eBC may experience, including their associated risk factors, as well as management and prevention strategies. We also explore the evidence of the long-term impact of treatment on the HRQoL of patients with gBRCAm. By providing a comprehensive overview of current evidence and recommendations regarding patients’ HRQoL, we aim to equip clinicians with scientific and clinical knowledge and provide guidance to optimize care and improve long-term outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1808 KiB  
Systematic Review
Effectiveness and Safety of Acupuncture for Nausea and Vomiting in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Sung-A Kim, Sujung Yeo and Sabina Lim
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1287; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071287 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 543
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Nausea and vomiting (NV) are common and distressing adverse effects among cancer patients undergoing treatment. Despite the widespread use of pharmacological antiemetics, these medications are often insufficient for controlling nausea and may cause medication interactions and side effects. Acupuncture [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Nausea and vomiting (NV) are common and distressing adverse effects among cancer patients undergoing treatment. Despite the widespread use of pharmacological antiemetics, these medications are often insufficient for controlling nausea and may cause medication interactions and side effects. Acupuncture has been proposed as a complementary therapy; however, the comprehensive analysis of its effects on NV across all emetogenic cancer treatments remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in managing NV in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery. Materials and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across three electronic databases and two clinical registry platforms from inception to December 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating acupuncture for NV in cancer patients were included. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Safety outcomes were assessed based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results: Seventeen RCTs met the inclusion criteria, with twelve studies included in the meta-analysis. Acupuncture did not demonstrate significant effects on acute nausea (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.84–1.15; p = 0.80) or acute vomiting (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.65–1.32; p = 0.67). However, it significantly reduced delayed vomiting (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61–0.95; p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant effects when acupuncture was administered for at least five days (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.39–0.81; p = 0.002). The most frequently used acupoints were PC6, ST36, CV12, LI4, LR3, and ST25. No serious adverse events related to acupuncture treatments were reported, with only minor AEs such as localized bleeding and mild bruising observed. Conclusions: Acupuncture represents a safe and effective complementary therapy for managing delayed vomiting in cancer patients receiving emetogenic treatments. Clinicians can anticipate optimal benefits from at least five days of treatment, particularly using acupoints PC6, ST36, CV12, LI4, LR3, and ST25. Further high-quality studies are needed to establish standardized treatment regimens and explore its comprehensive effects on NV. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2361 KiB  
Review
Chemotherapy-Free Treatment with Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
by M. Zeeshan Ozair, Balazs Halmos, Angelica D’Aiello, Jaewon Yun, Andrea R. Filippi, Andreas Rimner, Steven H. Lin, Charles B. Simone and Nitin Ohri
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1524; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091524 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1337
Abstract
Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by immunotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), yet many patients are ineligible due to treatment-related toxicity or poor functional status. Chemotherapy-free approaches using radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy may offer a safer [...] Read more.
Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by immunotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), yet many patients are ineligible due to treatment-related toxicity or poor functional status. Chemotherapy-free approaches using radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy may offer a safer and equally effective alternative in select patient populations. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and relevant conference proceedings focusing on trials between 2000 and 2024. Studies investigating chemotherapy-free regimens combining RT and immunotherapy in LA-NSCLC were analyzed, with emphasis on clinical outcomes, biomarker use, treatment sequencing, radiation dose/fractionation, and safety. Results: Multiple Phase I/II trials reported promising efficacy with one-year progression-free survival (PFS) ranging from 39% to 76%. Toxicity was generally acceptable, though higher-grade adverse events were more frequent in older, frail populations. Trials integrating PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) showed potential for improved patient stratification. Variation in immunotherapy timing (induction, concurrent, or consolidation) and radiation schedules highlight the need for optimization. Conclusions: Chemotherapy-free regimens represent a promising treatment strategy for patients with LA-NSCLC, especially those that are ineligible for standard CRT. Biomarker-driven patient selection and the rational integration of RT and immunotherapy are critical to improving outcomes. Randomized trials are warranted to establish the efficacy and safety of these emerging approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Curative Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 645 KiB  
Systematic Review
A Systematic Review of Pneumonitis Following Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Radiotherapy
by Melina Yerolatsite, Nanteznta Torounidou, Anna-Lea Amylidi, Iro-Chrisavgi Rapti, George Zarkavelis, Eleftherios Kampletsas and Paraskevi V. Voulgari
Biomedicines 2025, 13(4), 946; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040946 - 12 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1254
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly included in management guidelines for various types of cancer. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are an inevitable consequence of these therapies. Some of these side effects, such as pneumonitis, can be particularly serious. Additionally, the combination [...] Read more.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly included in management guidelines for various types of cancer. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are an inevitable consequence of these therapies. Some of these side effects, such as pneumonitis, can be particularly serious. Additionally, the combination of ICIs with radiotherapy (RT) may further increase the risk of pneumonitis. Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to examine all available studies on pneumonitis following the use of ICIs and RT to assess its appearance and severity. Methods: We systematically searched four different databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and DOAJ) to identify all relevant studies within our scope. Additionally, we reviewed the references of the studies we found, as well as those of other systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2 for randomized controlled trials and the RTI Risk of Bias Item Bank for non-randomized trials. Finally, we extracted relevant data into an Excel file and presented them in tables throughout this study. Results: A total of 58 articles met our inclusion criteria, comprising 4889 patients across multiple studies and nine case reports. Due to significant heterogeneity in study methodologies and data reporting, a cumulative statistical analysis was not performed. The included studies were published between 2017 and 2025. The incidence of pneumonitis varied, with retrospective studies showing higher rates compared to randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. Case reports described a range of pneumonitis presentations, treatments, and outcomes, with corticosteroids being the primary treatment. Conclusions: The incidence of pneumonitis varied, with retrospective studies showing the highest rates compared to other study designs. Early detection and management of pneumonitis in patients receiving RT and/or ICIs are crucial for improving outcomes. Identifying high-risk patients through predictive models, radiomics, and biomarkers may help tailor treatment strategies and minimize toxicity. Further research is needed to establish the most appropriate diagnostic criteria, optimize management approaches, and refine advanced imaging and biomarker-based risk stratification to improve patient care. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for reducing the risk of pneumonitis and improving patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Immunotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Cancer)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 7664 KiB  
Article
ALDH1A3 Regulates Cellular Senescence and Senescence-Associated Secretome in Prostate Cancer
by Sen Wang, Lin Wang and Yu Zhao
Cancers 2025, 17(7), 1184; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17071184 - 31 Mar 2025
Viewed by 759
Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy is a key treatment for cancer, effectively controlling local tumor growth through DNA damage that induces senescence or apoptosis in cancer cells. However, radiotherapy can trigger complex cellular reactions, such as cell senescence, which is characterized by irreversible cell cycle [...] Read more.
Background: Radiotherapy is a key treatment for cancer, effectively controlling local tumor growth through DNA damage that induces senescence or apoptosis in cancer cells. However, radiotherapy can trigger complex cellular reactions, such as cell senescence, which is characterized by irreversible cell cycle arrest and the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors known as the senescent-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Methods: This study investigates the regulatory role of ALDH1A3, a key enzyme implicated in cancer cell metabolism and radiotherapy resistance, in the induction of senescence and SASP. Using in vitro models, we demonstrate that ALDH1A3 knockdown accelerates cellular senescent-like phenotype while regulating the SASP through the cGAS–STING immune response pathway. Results: Our results indicate that while ALDH1A3 knockdown promotes senescence, it reduces the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors via inhibition of the cGAS–STING pathway, potentially mitigating SASP-related tumor progression. Conclusions: These findings provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying prostate cancer cell senescence and suggest that ALDH1A3 could be a potential therapeutic target to enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy while controlling the adverse effects of SASP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Cancer Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3467 KiB  
Article
The Incidence and Clinical Characteristics of Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
by Nurullah İlhan, Akif Doğan, Hande Nur Erölmez, Fatih Atalah, Süleyman Baş, Servan Yasar, Hatice Odabaş and Mahmut Gümüş
Medicina 2025, 61(3), 549; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030549 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1268
Abstract
Background and Objectives: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor-positive HER2 negative (HR(+)/HER2(-)) breast cancer. Despite their efficacy, interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains a rare but potentially fatal adverse effect. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have revolutionized the treatment of hormone receptor-positive HER2 negative (HR(+)/HER2(-)) breast cancer. Despite their efficacy, interstitial lung disease (ILD) remains a rare but potentially fatal adverse effect. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of ILD associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer patients in Turkey. Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicenter analysis included 464 breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors between January 2017 and April 2024. Patients receiving ribociclib or palbociclib were evaluated for the development of ILD. Radiological assessments were performed to confirm ILD and exclude other conditions. Clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: ILD was identified in 10 patients (2.1%). The average age of the affected patients was 62.5 ± 9.85 years. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) were the most common radiological patterns. Palbociclib was implicated in six cases, while ribociclib was associated with four cases. Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity was observed in eight patients, and Grade 4 toxicity in two patients. One patient who was on palbociclib died due to ILD. No significant correlation was found between ILD and age, smoking status, lung metastases, or prior thoracic radiotherapy. Conclusions: The incidence of CDK4/6 inhibitor-associated ILD in Turkish breast cancer patients appears higher than previously reported in clinical trials. More robust, long-term studies are necessary to identify potential risk factors and mitigate ILD-related mortality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Frontiers in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 792 KiB  
Review
Clinical Progress of Fruquintinib in Colorectal Cancer: An Overview
by Yejie Xie, Shu Tang, Ziheng Qin and Chaogang Yang
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(2), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18020280 - 19 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1876
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Conventional treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, have limited effects on advanced and metastatic CRC (mCRC). Fruquintinib, a novel and highly selective vascular endothelial growth factor [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Conventional treatments, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, have limited effects on advanced and metastatic CRC (mCRC). Fruquintinib, a novel and highly selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, has shown significant efficacy and tolerance in treating mCRC. The FRESCO and FRESCO-2 trials demonstrated that fruquintinib significantly prolongs progression-free survival and the overall survival of refractory mCRC patients, establishing it as the standard third-line treatment strategy for mCRC. In addition, the combination of fruquintinib with other anticancer drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrated potential for enhanced efficacy, which warrants further exploration. In this review, we aimed to systematically summarize the current knowledge about the pharmacological mechanisms, pharmacokinetic characteristics, adverse events, and corresponding treatment options of fruquintinib and provide an update on the clinical trials related to fruquintinib in CRC by conducting a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and consulting the relevant clinical trials via ClinicalTrials.gov and the ChiCTR website, aiming to offer new insights into the role of fruquintinib in the comprehensive treatment of CRC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacogenomics for Precision Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 1042 KiB  
Review
Optimizing Osimertinib for NSCLC: Targeting Resistance and Exploring Combination Therapeutics
by Yan-You Liao, Chia-Luen Tsai and Hsiang-Po Huang
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030459 - 29 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4902
Abstract
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations present in a substantial proportion of patients. Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKI), exemplified by osimertinib, have dramatically improved outcomes by effectively targeting [...] Read more.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations present in a substantial proportion of patients. Third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKI), exemplified by osimertinib, have dramatically improved outcomes by effectively targeting the T790M mutation—a primary driver of acquired resistance to earlier-generation EGFR TKI. Despite these successes, resistance to third-generation EGFR TKIs inevitably emerges. Mechanisms include on-target mutations such as C797S, activation of alternative pathways like MET amplification, histologic transformations, and intricate tumor microenvironment (TME) alterations. These resistance pathways are compounded by challenges in tolerability, adverse events, and tumor heterogeneity. In light of these hurdles, this review examines the evolving landscape of combination therapies designed to enhance or prolong the effectiveness of third-generation EGFR TKIs. We explore key strategies that pair osimertinib with radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and other molecularly targeted drugs, and we discuss the biological rationale, preclinical evidence, and clinical trial data supporting these approaches. Emphasis is placed on how these combinations may circumvent diverse resistance mechanisms, improve survival, and maintain a favorable safety profile. By integrating the latest findings, this review aims to guide clinicians and researchers toward more individualized and durable treatment options, ultimately enhancing both survival and quality of life for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1596 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Effect of the Concurrent Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Receptor Blockers on Toxicity and Outcomes in Patients Treated with Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Wan-Chuen Liao, Hala Shokr, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Clare Dempsey, Kaye Janine Williams and Li-Chia Chen
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(1), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18010105 - 16 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1871
Abstract
Background/Objectives: ACEIs protect against radiation pneumonitis by reducing angiotensin II production, oxidative stress, and inflammation. This study highlights the significance of concurrent angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use in radiotherapy by evaluating its impact on radiotherapy-related side effects [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: ACEIs protect against radiation pneumonitis by reducing angiotensin II production, oxidative stress, and inflammation. This study highlights the significance of concurrent angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use in radiotherapy by evaluating its impact on radiotherapy-related side effects and survival outcomes, addressing the gap in existing research and providing insights to guide clinical practice in oncology. Methods: The literature was retrieved from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from January 2000 to October 2024. Studies on adults (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed cancer, receiving ACEIs or ARBs during radiotherapy, were included. Radiotherapy-related side effects and clinical outcomes were analysed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs), comparing ACEI/ARB users to non-users. Differences in the median survival time, recurrence, and death rates were also calculated. Results: Sixteen studies (14 cohort studies and two randomised trials) were included. ACEI users exhibited a 50% reduction in the risk of ≥grade 2 radiation pneumonitis (OR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.32–0.77) in lung cancer and significant reductions in the odds of proctitis (80%, OR: 0.20, 95%CI: 0.12–0.33), haematuria (75%, OR: 0.25, 95%CI: 0.16–0.41), and rectal bleeding (61%, OR: 0.39, 95%CI: 0.30–0.51) in prostate cancer. ACEI/ARB users showed reduced symptomatic radiation necrosis in brain metastases and better 6-month functional independence in supratentorial glioblastoma. Among six studies reporting survival, ACEI/ARB users had longer median survival in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer and glioblastoma but shorter survival in small cell lung cancer and brain metastases. ARB users had inconsistent survival rates for lung cancer. The varying survival outcomes suggest that ACEIs/ARBs have different effects depending on the cancer type and stage, potentially influenced by cancer-specific factors, treatment protocols, or disease progression. Conclusions: ACEI use is associated with a reduction in radiation pneumonitis, but evidence for other radiotherapy-related toxicity and survival outcomes remains inconsistent across cancer types and severities. Further research should carefully control for confounders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 281 KiB  
Review
Double-J Ureteral Stenting in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Pivotal or Problematic?
by Viorel-Dragos Radu, Radu Cristian Costache, Pavel Onofrei, Pavel Banov, Feras Al Jaafari, Ingrid-Andrada Vasilache, Demetra Socolov and Rodica Radu
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7649; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247649 - 16 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1614
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Double-J stents are urinary catheters that are frequently used in urology. They are now also used in other specialist areas such as obstetrics and gynecology. However, the use of double-J stents is not without side effects. The aim of [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Double-J stents are urinary catheters that are frequently used in urology. They are now also used in other specialist areas such as obstetrics and gynecology. However, the use of double-J stents is not without side effects. The aim of this review was to highlight the indications and possible adverse effects of the use of these stents in obstetrics and gynecology. Materials and Methods: We analyzed works published after 1995 in the PUBMED, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases related to the use of double-J stents in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as reported adverse events. We carried out a narrative review of the available literature on this topic. Results: We identified 69 relevant publications that we included in the review. In obstetrics, indications include the treatment of gestational hydronephrosis, some urological conditions during pregnancy, such as obstructive urinary calculi, with or without superinfection, or intraoperative use for cesarean section or hysterectomy after cesarean section, to protect from, or to solve, ureteral lesions. In gynecology, they are used preoperatively or intraoperatively to protect the ureter during gynecological operations in the pelvic area or postoperatively to repair some ureteral injuries. They are also indicated for ureteral obstructions that occur after pelvic radiotherapy for gynecological neoplasms. Complications associated with the use of double-J stents include more frequent urinary tract infections, lower urinary tract symptoms, calcifications and misplacements. Conclusions: Double-J stents are widely used in obstetrics and gynecology and are characterized by good efficiency and safety, although some side effects may occur (lower urinary tract symptoms, hematuria, complications in birth outcomes), which do not limit their use. Summary of evidence: In this review, we analyzed the indications and complications of double-J ureteral stenting in obstetric and gynecologic patients. We found that the procedure is safe, both in the treatment of ureteral obstruction and in the resolution of postoperative complications. No serious complications of ureteral stenting have been noted that would constitute a contraindication to its use. Future prospective studies in large patient cohorts are necessary to validate our data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics & Gynecology)
11 pages, 503 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Role of Transarterial Embolization Plus Radiotherapy Compared to Radiotherapy or Transarterial Embolization Alone in the Management of Painful Bone Metastases: Results of a Systematic Review
by Antonio Vizzuso, Matteo Renzulli, Valentina Lancellotta, Alessandro Posa, Patrizia Cornacchione, Bruno Fionda, Ciro Mazzarella, Davide De Leoni, Luca Tagliaferri, Emanuela Giampalma and Roberto Iezzi
Cancers 2024, 16(24), 4183; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16244183 - 15 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1284
Abstract
This study systematically reviews the efficacy and safety of combining transarterial embolization (TAE) with radiotherapy (RT) for managing bone metastases (BM), assessing clinical response (CR), and local control (LC). A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline Plus, and the Cochrane [...] Read more.
This study systematically reviews the efficacy and safety of combining transarterial embolization (TAE) with radiotherapy (RT) for managing bone metastases (BM), assessing clinical response (CR), and local control (LC). A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline Plus, and the Cochrane Library identified three relevant studies with 74 patients and 103 BM. One study included local chemotherapy infusion with TAE. All studies reported CR rates, though one used skeletal-related events as a surrogate, while only one study provided LC rates. Adverse events were noted across all studies. A quantitative analysis of CR rates showed a relative risk (RR) of 0.15 (confidence interval (CI): 0.03–0.69) favoring TAE plus RT over RT alone, while no significant differences were observed between TAE plus RT and TAE alone (RR: 0.91; CI: 0.51–1.63). The combined TAE and RT approach demonstrated effectiveness in local tumor control and produced faster, longer-lasting pain relief than RT alone, although TAE was associated with a mild, transient increase in side effects. While TAE plus RT shows potential benefit and acceptable toxicity, the current evidence is of low quality. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Approaches and Advances in Interventional Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 269 KiB  
Article
Two-Year Experience of a Center of Excellence for the Comprehensive Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer at a Fourth-Level Hospital in Bogota, Colombia: Observational Case Series Study and Retrospective Analysis
by Luis Gerardo García-Herreros, Enid Ximena Rico-Rivera and Olga Milena García Morales
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6820; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226820 - 13 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1511
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of 56 patients admitted to the Lung Cancer Clinical Care Center (C3) at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (FSFB) between 2 May 2022 and 22 April 2024. The focus was on demographic characteristics, smoking [...] Read more.
Background: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of 56 patients admitted to the Lung Cancer Clinical Care Center (C3) at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (FSFB) between 2 May 2022 and 22 April 2024. The focus was on demographic characteristics, smoking history, comorbidities, lung cancer types, TNM classification, treatment modalities, and outcomes. Methods: This observational case series study reviewed medical records and included patients over 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data were collected and analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, treatment types, biomolecular profiling, and survival rates. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were anonymized. Results: The mean age was 71.8 years with a female predominance (53.6%). A history of smoking was present in 71.4% of patients. Adenocarcinoma was the most common type (75.0%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (19.6%). At admission, the most frequent TNM stages were IA2 (17.9%) and IVA (16.1%). One-year survival was 68.8%, and 94.3% of stage I–IIIA patients underwent PET scans. Biomolecular profiling revealed 69.2% non-mutated EGFR, 90.4% ALK-negative, and various PDL-1 expression levels. Immunotherapy was received by 91.4% of patients, with Alectinib and Osimertinib being common. Grade III–IV pneumonitis occurred in 5.4% of patients. Conclusions: The study’s findings align with existing literature, highlighting significant smoking history, common adenocarcinoma, and substantial use of immunotherapy. Limitations include the observational design, small sample size, and short follow-up period, impacting the generalizability and long-term outcome assessment. Future research should address these limitations and explore longitudinal outcomes and emerging therapies. Full article
7 pages, 213 KiB  
Communication
The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Oligoprogressive Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Treated with ICIs–TKIs: A Retrospective Multicentric Study
by Maria La Vecchia, Manuela Federico, Dario Aiello, Valentina Zagardo, Antonella Mazzonello, Lorella Testa, Leonarda La Paglia, Tiziana Bruno and Ivan Fazio
J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14(10), 1030; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14101030 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1329
Abstract
Background: This multicentric, retrospective study investigated the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who experienced oligoprogression during a combination therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and a tyrosine–kinase inhibitor (TKI). Methods: We retrospectively [...] Read more.
Background: This multicentric, retrospective study investigated the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who experienced oligoprogression during a combination therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and a tyrosine–kinase inhibitor (TKI). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 34 pts affected by oligoprogressive RCC treated with an ICI–TKI combination between January 2020 and December 2023. SBRT was delivered to each site of oligoprogressive metastatic disease. After SBRT, pts were given follow-up clinical evaluations. 6–12–18-month local control (LC) rates and median next-line treatment-free survival (NEST-FS) were the primary endpoints. The secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefits and safety. Results: After a median follow-up of 24 months, 6–12–18-month LC rates were 100%, 71% and 43%, respectively, and the median NEST-FS was 20 months. ORR was 90%, while clinical benefit was 100%. No > G2 adverse events related to SBRT were recorded. Conclusions: In our study, SBRT for oligoprogressive mRCC turned out to be a safe and useful treatment which was able to preserve current treatment. Further prospective studies are necessary to explore the effects of the ICIs–TKIs combination and SBRT upon oligoprogressive sites in mRCC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Advancements and Future Perspectives)
15 pages, 1168 KiB  
Systematic Review
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Proton Beam Therapy Compared to Conventional Radiotherapy in Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
by Kelvin Le, James Norton Marchant and Khang Duy Ricky Le
Medicina 2024, 60(9), 1426; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091426 - 31 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1772
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Conventional radiotherapies used in the current management of rectal cancer commonly cause iatrogenic radiotoxicity. Proton beam therapy has emerged as an alternative to conventional radiotherapy with the aim of improving tumour control and reducing off-set radiation exposure to surrounding [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Conventional radiotherapies used in the current management of rectal cancer commonly cause iatrogenic radiotoxicity. Proton beam therapy has emerged as an alternative to conventional radiotherapy with the aim of improving tumour control and reducing off-set radiation exposure to surrounding tissue. However, the real-world treatment and oncological outcomes associated with the use of proton beam therapy in rectal cancer remain poorly characterised. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the radiation dosages and safety of proton beam therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A computer-assisted search was performed on the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central databases. Studies that evaluated the adverse effects and oncological outcomes of proton beam therapy and conventional radiotherapy in adult patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer were included. Results: Eight studies were included in this review. There was insufficient evidence to determine the adverse treatment outcomes of proton beam therapy versus conventional radiotherapy. No current studies assessed radiotoxicities nor oncological outcomes. Pooled dosimetric comparisons between proton beam therapy and various conventional radiotherapies were associated with reduced radiation exposure to the pelvis, bowel and bladder. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates a significant paucity of evidence in the current literature surrounding adverse effects and oncological outcomes related to proton beam therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy for non-metastatic rectal cancer. Pooled analyses of dosimetric studies highlight greater predicted radiation-sparing effects with proton beam therapy in this setting. This evidence, however, is based on evidence at a moderate risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity. Overall, more robust, prospective clinical trials are required. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop