Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = posterior cervical foraminotomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 2466 KB  
Article
Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy
by Sang Youp Han, Sang Hyub Lee, Jae Won Jang, Choon Keun Park and Dong Geun Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(12), 4589; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589 - 12 Jun 2026
Viewed by 222
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between microscopic and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). Methods: This study included 73 patients who underwent microscopic PCF (n = 40) or UBE PCF (n [...] Read more.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between microscopic and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). Methods: This study included 73 patients who underwent microscopic PCF (n = 40) or UBE PCF (n = 33) for single-level cervical foraminal disc herniation or stenosis between January 2018 and December 2021. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiologic outcomes were evaluated with cervical range of motion (ROM) using computed tomography and flexion-extension dynamic radiography. Results: The mean follow-up period for microscopic and UBE PCF was 33.0 ± 7.6 months and 29.9 ± 5.9 months, respectively. The postoperative neck VAS until postoperative 2 weeks was significantly lower in the UBE PCF group than in the microscopic PCF group (p < 0.05). The estimated blood loss and operative time were significantly lower in the UBE PCF group than in the microscopic PCF group, while the length of hospital stay was numerically shorter but did not reach statistical significance. The two groups had no significant difference in the NDI on the preoperative and postoperative 3 months. The recurrence occurred in 1 patient (2.5%) of the microscopic PCF group and 1 patient (3%) of the UBE PCF group. The revision surgery was performed in 2 patients (5%) of the microscopic PCF group and in 1 patient of the UBE PCF group. There were no significant differences in motion and instability between the two groups. Conclusions: Both microscopic and UBE PCF are effective and safe procedures for treating cervical radiculopathy due to cervical foraminal disc herniation or stenosis. The UBE approach may provide advantages mainly in early postoperative recovery, including lower early postoperative neck pain, while long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes appear comparable to those of microscopic PCF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research on Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1786 KB  
Article
Preliminary Quantitative MRI Assessment After Combined Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Discectomy and Foraminotomy: An Exploratory Retrospective Cohort Study
by Tomasz Sienkiel, Barbara Jasiewicz, Dominik Taterra, Marcin Gąska, Przemysław Koszyk, Klemens Machajewski and Artur Gądek
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(11), 4129; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15114129 - 27 May 2026
Viewed by 229
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy is an established motion-preserving procedure for selected patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy. However, isolated foraminal decompression may be insufficient in cases with concomitant foraminal stenosis and lateral soft disk herniation. This preliminary study evaluated clinical outcomes and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy is an established motion-preserving procedure for selected patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy. However, isolated foraminal decompression may be insufficient in cases with concomitant foraminal stenosis and lateral soft disk herniation. This preliminary study evaluated clinical outcomes and quantitative MRI changes after combined posterior endoscopic cervical diskectomy and foraminotomy (CEDF) and explored the relationship between postoperative foraminal enlargement and clinical improvement. Methods: This retrospective single-center exploratory cohort study included 15 consecutive patients with single-level unilateral cervical radiculopathy caused by combined foraminal stenosis and lateral soft disc herniation who were treated between 2021 and 2023. All patients underwent CEDF using a posterior full-endoscopic approach. Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively, at 6 weeks, and at 12 months using the Visual Analog Scale for arm and neck pain, the Neck Disability Index, and modified MacNab criteria. Quantitative MRI assessment included minimal foraminal diameter, Foraminal Symmetry Index (FSI), and Quantitative Cervical Expansion (QCE). Correlations between radiological and clinical outcomes were analyzed as exploratory, hypothesis-generating analyses. Results: Mean minimal foraminal diameter increased from 1.9 ± 0.7 mm preoperatively to 4.1 ± 0.8 mm postoperatively, with improvement in FSI from 0.40 ± 0.12 to 0.89 ± 0.11. Significant clinical improvement was observed across all outcome measures. Mean arm pain decreased from 7.2 ± 1.3 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 1.4 at final follow-up, while NDI improved from 48.0 ± 14.0% to 18.3 ± 12.0%. The minimum clinically important difference for arm pain reduction was achieved in 14 of 15 patients. A moderate positive exploratory association was observed between foraminal enlargement and reduction in arm pain severity. No major neurological complications, postoperative instability, or revision procedures were observed in this small cohort during the available follow-up. Conclusions: In this preliminary retrospective single-center cohort, CEDF was associated with clinical improvement and measurable postoperative foraminal enlargement in carefully selected patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy caused by combined foraminal stenosis and lateral soft disc herniation. The observed association between foraminal enlargement and arm pain reduction should be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size and exploratory design. QCE and FSI should be regarded as preliminary quantitative radiological indices rather than validated markers of decompression adequacy or clinical response. Larger prospective comparative studies are required to validate these findings and define the role of CEDF among established cervical decompression procedures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 896 KB  
Systematic Review
Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Cervical Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review
by Dong Hun Kim, Jung-Woo Hur and Jae Taek Hong
Medicina 2026, 62(5), 977; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050977 - 17 May 2026
Viewed by 360
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive cervical spine surgery (MIS-CSS) relies heavily on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, raising concerns about radiation exposure to patients and surgical staff. Unlike lumbar MIS, cervical-specific radiation exposure has not been systematically reviewed, despite distinct anatomical considerations, including proximity [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive cervical spine surgery (MIS-CSS) relies heavily on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, raising concerns about radiation exposure to patients and surgical staff. Unlike lumbar MIS, cervical-specific radiation exposure has not been systematically reviewed, despite distinct anatomical considerations, including proximity to the thyroid gland and lens of the eye. This review aims to quantify intraoperative radiation exposure during MIS cervical spine procedures and evaluate available dose-reduction strategies. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar in April 2026 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting original quantitative radiation data during minimally invasive cervical spine procedures in adult patients (≥10 patients) were included. Quality was assessed using the MINORS tool and the JBI checklist. Results: Seven studies encompassing 380 patients were included. Procedures comprised ACDF (four studies), minimally invasive posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy (two studies), and CT-navigated cervical instrumentation (one study). Patient effective doses during ACDF ranged from 0.015 to 1.3 mSv, with thyroid doses of 0.194–0.290 mGy. Standalone ACDF reduced patient dose by 36–58% compared to plated ACDF (p < 0.001). Navigation-assisted posterior cervical foraminotomy achieved a median fluoroscopy time of 10 s with negligible staff exposure. Surgeon per-procedure exposure during cervical discectomy (chest 0.122 µSv, lens 3.1 µSv, hands 7.1 µSv) was approximately half that of lumbar discectomy. Conclusions: Radiation doses during individual MIS cervical procedures appear to be within occupational safety limits, though the current evidence is insufficient to establish definitive dose thresholds. Standalone implant designs and intraoperative navigation represent effective, complementary dose-reduction strategies. Standardized prospective research is needed to establish cervical-specific radiation safety benchmarks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1363 KB  
Case Report
Endoscopic Decompression of Radiculopathy Caused by Vertebral Artery Loop Formation: Case Report and Literature Review
by Tae Hoon Yang, In-Suk Bae, Hee In Kang, Jae Hoon Kim and Cheolsu Jwa
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3643; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103643 - 9 May 2026
Viewed by 249
Abstract
Background: Cervical radiculopathy due to vertebral artery loop formation (VALF) is rare. This case demonstrates endoscopic posterior foraminotomy after failed conservative treatment. Methods: We report a case of VALF treated by means of uniportal full-endoscopic posterior foraminotomy. A focused narrative literature review identified [...] Read more.
Background: Cervical radiculopathy due to vertebral artery loop formation (VALF) is rare. This case demonstrates endoscopic posterior foraminotomy after failed conservative treatment. Methods: We report a case of VALF treated by means of uniportal full-endoscopic posterior foraminotomy. A focused narrative literature review identified prior surgical cases of VALF-related cervical radiculopathy. Case description: A 69-year-old woman had a 4-month right C5 radiculopathy (neck pain, arm radiation, Spurling-positive) due to VALF at C4-5, confirmed via MRI and CT angiography. After failed conservative treatment, full-endoscopic posterior foraminotomy was performed; the symptoms resolved at 3 months. Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware that vertebral artery loop formation, although rare, is an important potential cause of cervical radiculopathy. In suspected cases, the vertebral artery should be carefully evaluated with MR or CT angiography to confirm the presence of a loop formation. Full-endoscopic posterior foraminotomy may be technically feasible for carefully selected patients with VALF-related cervical radiculopathy, demonstrating short-term symptom improvement in this case. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1036 KB  
Article
Short-Term Differences in Hospital Resource Utilization and Quality of Care Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A National Propensity-Scored Observational Study Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Database
by Jaskeerat Gujral, Jonathan H. Sussman, Daniel Gao, Yohannes Ghenbot, John D. Arena, Susanna Howard, Hasan S. Ahmad, John Shin, Jang W. Yoon, Ali K. Ozturk, William C. Welch and Mert Marcel Dagli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(18), 6438; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186438 - 12 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1206
Abstract
Background/Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are common treatments for cervical radiculopathy. This study compared post-operative outcomes between ACDF and PCF utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Methods: An observational [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are common treatments for cervical radiculopathy. This study compared post-operative outcomes between ACDF and PCF utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Methods: An observational study following STROBE and TRIPOD + AI guidelines compared hospital resource utilization and quality of care between single-level ACDF and PCF (2005–2022). Primary outcomes compared operative time, length of stay (LOS), and post-operative complications. Propensity-scored stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for confounders, specifically demographics, lifestyle-related factors, pre-operative labs, pre-existing comorbidities, and surgery-related factors. Subgroup analysis compared baseline characteristics and outcomes, stratified by 30-day re-admission and re-operation. Results: PCF group demonstrated shorter LOS (MD −0.7 days, 95% CI −0.9 to −0.5 days, p < 0.001), operative time (MD −32.9 min, 95% CI −35.7 to −30.1 min, p < 0.001), higher rate of re-admission associated with overall SSI (PD 1.2%, 95% CI 0.7–1.7%, p < 0.001), deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.2%, p < 0.001), and organ/space SSI (PD 0.3%, 95% CI 0.0–0.5%, p = 0.011). Furthermore, the PCF group had greater systemic sepsis (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.3%, p < 0.001), overall post-operative SSI (PD 2.8%, 95% CI 2.0–3.6%, p < 0.001), superficial SSI (PD 1.9%, 95% CI 1.2–2.5%, p < 0.001), and deep incisional SSI (PD 0.8%, 95% CI 0.4–1.2%, p < 0.001) rates. Subgroup analysis showed increased early post-operative re-operation rates in the PCF cohort (PD 23.4%, 95% CI 9.5–37.4%, p = 0.001) and increased early post-operative re-admission associated with post-operative overall SSI (PD 35.3%, 95% CI 22.7–48.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although the PCF cohort demonstrated lower hospital utilization, it had reduced quality of care and increased post-operative complications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4894 KB  
Review
Reoperation Strategy for Failure of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty at Index and Adjacent Levels
by Chae-Gwan Kong and Jong-Beom Park
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 2038; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062038 - 17 Mar 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4543
Abstract
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or [...] Read more.
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or facet joint degeneration, necessitating revision surgery. Reoperation strategies depend on the failure mechanism, instability, sagittal malalignment, and neural compression. Anterior revision is suited for prosthesis failure, recurrent disc herniation, or ASD, enabling prosthesis removal, decompression, and fusion. In select cases, reimplantation may restore motion. Posterior approaches are preferred for facet degeneration, multilevel stenosis, or posterior hypertrophy, with options including foraminotomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy and fusion. Complex cases may require combined anterior and posterior surgery for optimal decompression and stability. This narrative review outlines revision strategies, emphasizing biomechanical assessment, radiographic evaluation, and patient-specific considerations. Despite surgical challenges, meticulous planning and execution can optimize outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancements in Spine Surgery: Best Practices and Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3420 KB  
Article
Implementation and Feasibility of Mechanomyography in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
by Fabian Sommer, Ibrahim Hussain, Noah Willett, Mousa K. Hamad, Chibuikem A. Ikwuegbuenyi, Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez, Sertac Kirnaz, Lynn McGrath, Jacob Goldberg, Amanda Ng, Catherine Mykolajtchuk, Sam Haber, Vincent Sullivan, Pravesh S. Gadjradj and Roger Härtl
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(2), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15020042 - 23 Jan 2025
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2586
Abstract
Background: Mechanomyography (MMG) is a neurodiagnostic technique with a documented ability to evaluate the compression of nerve roots. Its utility in degenerative spine surgery is unknown. Objective: To assess the utility of intraoperative MMG during cervical posterior foraminotomy, minimally invasive transforaminal [...] Read more.
Background: Mechanomyography (MMG) is a neurodiagnostic technique with a documented ability to evaluate the compression of nerve roots. Its utility in degenerative spine surgery is unknown. Objective: To assess the utility of intraoperative MMG during cervical posterior foraminotomy, minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), and tubular lumbar far lateral discectomy. Methods: A prospective feasibility study was conducted during which MMG was applied during three procedures. Adhesive accelerometers were placed on two muscle groups per procedure. Stimulus threshold in mA was recorded before and after the decompression of the nerve root. Differences in stimulation thresholds were correlated with operative findings. Results: In total, 22 patients were included in this study; 5 patients underwent cervical foraminotomies, 3 underwent MIS-TLIFs, and 14 underwent tubular far lateral discectomies. For the foraminotomies, all cases showed a reduction in stimulation threshold (mean of 3.4 mA) after decompression. For MIS-TLIF cases, there was a limited reduction in the stimulation threshold after decompression (mean 1.7 mA). For far lateral discectomy, there was a mean reduction of 4.3 mA in the stimulation threshold following decompression. Conclusions: MMG is a method that may provide intraoperative feedback on the decompression of nerve roots. In the context of MIS-TLIF, MMG showed a limited decrease in stimulus threshold. This may be due to the identification of the nerve occurring after decompression is already underway. For cervical foraminotomies and far lateral discectomies, MMG showed promising results in determining adequate decompression of the nerve root. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4606 KB  
Article
Comparison of Open Microscopic and Biportal Endoscopic Approaches in Multi-Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes
by Hyung Rae Lee, Jae Min Park, In-Hee Kim, Jun-Hyun Kim and Jae-Hyuk Yang
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(1), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010164 - 30 Dec 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2754
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study compares clinical and radiological outcomes of open microscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) PCF in multi-level cases. While BESS PCF is effective in single-level surgeries, its role in multi-level procedures remains unclear. Methods: This [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study compares clinical and radiological outcomes of open microscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) PCF in multi-level cases. While BESS PCF is effective in single-level surgeries, its role in multi-level procedures remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 60 patients treated for cervical radiculopathy from 2016 to 2023, divided into two groups, open microscopic PCF (Group M, n = 30) and BESS PCF (Group B, n = 30). Clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain and the neck disability index (NDI). Radiological parameters included cervical angle, segmental angle, range of motion (ROM), and the extent of facetectomy. Results: Both groups showed improvement in the arm pain VAS and the NDI. However, Group B exhibited significantly better neck pain on the VAS at the final follow-up (p = 0.03). Radiologically, Group B maintained lordotic cervical and segmental angles postoperatively, while Group M showed kyphotic changes (p < 0.01). Segmental ROM was larger in Group M, indicating greater instability (p < 0.01). Group B had less extensive facetectomy while achieving comparable foraminal enlargement. Operative time was longer for Group B (p < 0.001). Conclusions: BESS PCF preserves cervical stability and reduces postoperative neck pain compared to open microscopic PCF in multi-level procedures. Despite longer operative times, its benefits in minimizing instability make it a promising option for treating multi-level cervical radiculopathy. Further research with long-term follow-up is recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Surgery: Clinical Advances and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1646 KB  
Article
Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
by Dong-Ho Lee, Hyung Rae Lee, Sang Yun Seok, Ji Uk Choi, Jae Min Park and Jae-Hyuk Yang
Medicina 2024, 60(9), 1496; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091496 - 13 Sep 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2100
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) aims to resolve cervical radiculopathy while preserving range of motion (ROM). However, its effectiveness in maintaining ROM is uncertain. This study investigates the changes in ROM after PCF and identifies preoperative factors that influence ROM reduction [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) aims to resolve cervical radiculopathy while preserving range of motion (ROM). However, its effectiveness in maintaining ROM is uncertain. This study investigates the changes in ROM after PCF and identifies preoperative factors that influence ROM reduction post surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated at our hospital from August 2016 to September 2021. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the neck disability index (NDI). Radiological outcomes included the segmental angle (SA), cervical angle (CA), C2–C7 SVA, Pfirrmann grade, extent of facetectomy, foraminal stenosis, and ROM. Patients were categorized into two groups based on segmental ROM changes: decreased (Group D) and maintained (Group M). Radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for ROM loss after PCF. Results: 76 patients were included: 34 in Group D and 42 in Group M, with no demographic differences. Preoperatively, Group D had significantly larger flexion segmental and cervical angles than Group M (segmental, p < 0.001; cervical, p = 0.001). Group D also had a higher Pfirrmann grade (p = 0.014) and more bony bridge formations (p = 0.004). While no significant differences were observed in arm pain VAS and NDI scores, Group D exhibited worse neck pain VAS at the last follow-up (p = 0.03). Univariate linear regression indicated that preoperative segmental ROM (p < 0.001, B = 0.82) and bony bridge formation (p = 0.046, B = 5.33) were significant predictors of ROM loss post PCF. Conclusions: Patients with higher preoperative flexion angles and Pfirrmann grades at the operative level are at an increased risk for ROM loss and neck pain and often exhibit bony bridge formation. Accounting for these factors can improve surgical planning and patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 12375 KB  
Technical Note
Novel Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Cervical Spondylosis Myeloradiculopathy: A Technical Note and Clinical Results
by Kai-Ting Chien, Yu-Cheng Chen, Ting-Kuo Chang, Yueh-Ching Liu, Lei-Po Chen, Yu-Ching Huang, Yan-Shiang Lian and Jian-You Li
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1910; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071910 - 26 Mar 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3235
Abstract
Background: This study investigates the efficacy of the Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (CE-ULFBD) technique in treating cervical myeloradiculopathy, primarily caused by degenerative spondylosis. Traditionally managed through multisegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy, this [...] Read more.
Background: This study investigates the efficacy of the Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (CE-ULFBD) technique in treating cervical myeloradiculopathy, primarily caused by degenerative spondylosis. Traditionally managed through multisegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy, this condition has recently experienced a promising shift towards minimally invasive approaches, particularly endoscopic spinal decompression. While empirical evidence is still emerging, these techniques show potential for effective treatment. Method: The objective was to evaluate the outcomes of CE-ULFBD in achieving single or multilevel bilateral foraminal and central decompression, emphasizing the reduction of injury to posterior cervical muscles and the associated postoperative neck soreness common in conventional procedures. This paper delineates the surgical procedures involved in CE-ULFBD and presents the clinical outcomes of nine patients diagnosed with myeloradiculopathy due to severe cervical stenosis. Result: Assessments were conducted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) for the activity measurement of daily living. Results indicated a considerable decrease in pain levels according to the VAS, coupled with significant improvements in functional capacities as measured by the mJOA scale. Additionally, no major postoperative complications were noted during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The study concludes that CE-ULFBD is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathy resulting from severe cervical stenosis, offering a viable and less invasive alternative to traditional decompressive surgeries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Surgery – from Basics to Advances Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2170 KB  
Article
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Comparative Study of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) for Cervical Foraminal Pathology
by Hyeun Sung Kim, Pang Hung Wu, Brian Zhao Jie Chin and Il Tae Jang
Medicina 2023, 59(7), 1222; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071222 - 29 Jun 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2719
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The purpose was to compaSre medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) surgery versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Materials [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The purpose was to compaSre medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) surgery versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Materials and Methods: A prospective registry of patients who had undergone either PPPV PECD surgery or ACDF surgery for cervical disc herniation or foraminal pathologies under a single fellowship-trained spine surgeon was performed. The baseline characteristics and operative details including complications were recorded for all included patients. The clinical outcomes evaluated include VAS, MJOA, motor score, and NDI and MacNab’s score. The radiological parameters in neutral-measured facet length, facet area, disc height, C2–C7 angle, neck tilt angle, T1 slope and thoracic inlet angle were also evaluated. Results: A total of 55 patients (29 PPPV PECD, 26 ACDF) were included, with mean follow-up periods of 21.9 and 32.3 months, respectively. Each cohort was noted to have a single case of surgical complication. Statistically significant changes of facet area (49.05 ± 14.50%) and facet length (52.71 ± 15.11%) were noted in the PPPV PECD group. At neutral alignment of the neck on a lateral X-ray, compared to ACDF, PPPV PECD had a statistically significant change in neck tilt angle (−11.68 ± 17.35°) and T1 slope angle (−11.69 ± 19.58°). Whilst both PPPV PECD and ACDF had significant improvements in VAS, MJOA and NDI postoperatively, PPPV PECD was found to be superior across all above scores at various follow-up timepoints compared to its ACDF counterparts. Conclusions: PPPV PECD surgery achieved a satisfactory radiological correction of neck alignment and significantly improved clinical outcomes at medium-term follow-up for our cohort of patients, highlighting its feasibility in treating patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Endoscopic Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 919 KB  
Article
Microendoscopic Surgery for Degenerative Disorders of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: The Influence of the Tubular Workspace on Instrument Angulation, Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Reoperation Rates
by Joachim M. Oertel and Benedikt W. Burkhardt
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(6), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060912 - 30 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2579
Abstract
Background: Long-term clinical outcomes with microendoscopic spine surgery (MESS) are poorly investigated. The effect of instrument angulation on clinical outcomes has yet to be assessed. Methods: A total of 229 consecutive patients operated on via two MESS systems were analyzed. Instrument angulation for [...] Read more.
Background: Long-term clinical outcomes with microendoscopic spine surgery (MESS) are poorly investigated. The effect of instrument angulation on clinical outcomes has yet to be assessed. Methods: A total of 229 consecutive patients operated on via two MESS systems were analyzed. Instrument angulation for both MESS systems, which differ from each other regarding the working space for instruments, was assessed using a computer model. Patients’ charts and endoscopic video recordings were reviewed to determine clinical outcomes, complications, and revision surgery rates. At a minimum follow-up of two years, clinical outcomes were assessed employing the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: A total of 52 posterior cervical foraminotomies (PCF) and 177 lumbar decompression procedures were performed. The mean follow-up was six years (range 2–9 years). At the final follow-up, 69% of cervical and 76% of lumbar patients had no radicular pain. The mean NDI was 10%, and the mean ODI was 12%. PCF resulted in excellent clinical outcomes in 80% of cases and 87% of lumbar procedures. Recurrent disc herniations occurred in 7.7% of patients. The surgical time and repeated procedure rate were significantly lower for the MESS system with increased working space, whereas the clinical outcome and rate of complication were similar. Conclusions: MESS achieves high success rates for treating degenerative spinal disorders in the long term. Increased instrument angulation improves access to the compressive pathology and lowers the surgical time and repeated procedure rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Path to Personalized Pain Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2904 KB  
Article
Posterior Preventive Foraminotomy before Laminectomy Combined with Pedicle Screw Fixation May Decrease the Incidence of C5 Palsy in Complex Cervical Spine Surgery in Patients with Severe Myeloradiculopathy
by Yong-Ho Lee, Mahmoud Abdou, Ji-Won Kwon, Kyung-Soo Suk, Seong-Hwan Moon, You-Gun Won, Tae-Jin Lee and Byung-Ho Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(6), 2227; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062227 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5103
Abstract
C5 palsy is a frequent sequela of cervical decompression surgeries for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Although many researchers have suggested various risk factors, such as cord shifting and the correction of lordotic angles, the tethering of the C5 root beneath the narrow foramen is an [...] Read more.
C5 palsy is a frequent sequela of cervical decompression surgeries for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Although many researchers have suggested various risk factors, such as cord shifting and the correction of lordotic angles, the tethering of the C5 root beneath the narrow foramen is an independent risk factor for C5 palsy. In this study, we tried to investigate different techniques for foramen decompression with posterior cervical fusion and assess the incidence of C5 palsy with each technique depending on the order of foraminal decompression. A combined 540° approach with LMS and uncovertebrectomy was used in group 1. Group 2 combined a 540° approach with pedicle screws and posterior foraminotomy, while posterior approach only with pedicle screws and foraminotomy was used in group 3. For groups 2 and 3, prophylactic posterior foraminotomy was performed before laminectomy. Motor manual testing to assess C5 palsy, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were determined before and after surgery. Simple radiographs, MRI and CT scans, were obtained to assess radiologic parameters preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 362 patients were enrolled in this study: 208 in group 1, 72 in group 2, and 82 in group 3. The mean age was 63.2, 65.5, and 66.6 years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median for fused levels was 4 for the three groups. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the number of fused levels. Weight, height, comorbidities, and diagnosis were not significantly different between groups. Preoperative JOA scores were similar between groups (p = 0.256), whereas the preoperative NDI score was significantly higher in group 3 than in group 2 (p = 0.040). Mean JOA score at 12-month follow-up was 15.5 ± 1.89, 16.1 ± 1.48, and 16.1 ± 1.48 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was higher in group 3 compared with group 1 (p = 0.008) and in group 2 compared with group 1 (p = 0.024). NDI score at 12 months was 13, 12, and 13 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was significantly better in group 3 than in group 1 (p = 0.040), but there were no other significant differences between groups. The incidence of C5 palsy was significantly lower in posterior foraminotomy groups with pedicle screws (groups 2 and 3) than in LMS with uncovertebrectomy (group 1) (p < 0.001). Thus, preventive expansive foraminotomy before decompressive laminectomy is able to significantly decrease the root tethering by stenotic lesion, and subsequently, decrease the incidence of C5 palsy associated with posterior only or combined posterior and anterior cervical fusion surgeries. Additionally, such expansive foraminotomy might be appropriate with pedicle screw insertion based on biomechanical considerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Challenges and Advances in Cervical Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4061 KB  
Technical Note
Comparison of Outcomes between Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic and Percutaneous Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Keyhole Surgeries
by Dong Wang, Jinchao Xu, Chengyue Zhu, Wei Zhang and Hao Pan
Medicina 2023, 59(3), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59030437 - 23 Feb 2023
Cited by 34 | Viewed by 6271
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) and percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (PE) keyhole surgeries. Methods: Patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) treated by UBE or PE [...] Read more.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) and percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (PE) keyhole surgeries. Methods: Patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) treated by UBE or PE keyhole surgery from May 2017 to April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The length of incision, fluoroscopic time, postoperative hospital stay, and total cost were compared. The clinical efficacy was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), and modified MacNab criteria. Moreover, the C2-7 Cobb’s angle, range of motion (ROM), intervertebral height, vertebral horizontal displacement, and angular displacement of the surgical segment were measured. Results: A total of 154 patients were enrolled, including 89 patients in the UBE group and 65 patients in the PE group, with a follow-up period of 24–32 months. Compared with PE surgery, UBE surgery required shorter fluoroscopic times (6.76 ± 1.09 vs. 8.31 ± 1.10 s) and operation times (77.48 ± 17.37 vs. 84.92 ± 21.97 min) but led to higher total hospitalization costs and longer incisions. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative hospital stay, bleeding volume, VAS score, NDI score, effective rate, or complication rate between the UBE and PE groups. Both the C2-7 Cobb’s angle and ROM increased significantly after surgery, with no significant differences between groups. There were no significant differences between intervertebral height, vertebral horizontal displacement, and angular displacement of the surgical segment at different times. Conclusions: Both UBE and PE surgeries in the treatment of CSR were effective and similar after 24 months. The fluoroscopic and operation times of UBE were shorter than those of PE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Endoscopic Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop