Next Article in Journal
Clinical Determinants of Halitosis in Elderly Patients with Complete, Partial, and Fixed Prosthetic Rehabilitation
Previous Article in Journal
Drone-Induced Midfacial Blast Injuries: Early Definitive Reconstruction and 5-Year Outcomes from a Single-Center Cohort
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functional Ureteral Obstruction Due to Retroperitoneal Tissue Interposition During Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Report of Two Cases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy

1
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon 16542, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Central Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(12), 4589; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 April 2026 / Revised: 29 May 2026 / Accepted: 9 June 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research on Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between microscopic and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). Methods: This study included 73 patients who underwent microscopic PCF (n = 40) or UBE PCF (n = 33) for single-level cervical foraminal disc herniation or stenosis between January 2018 and December 2021. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiologic outcomes were evaluated with cervical range of motion (ROM) using computed tomography and flexion-extension dynamic radiography. Results: The mean follow-up period for microscopic and UBE PCF was 33.0 ± 7.6 months and 29.9 ± 5.9 months, respectively. The postoperative neck VAS until postoperative 2 weeks was significantly lower in the UBE PCF group than in the microscopic PCF group (p < 0.05). The estimated blood loss and operative time were significantly lower in the UBE PCF group than in the microscopic PCF group, while the length of hospital stay was numerically shorter but did not reach statistical significance. The two groups had no significant difference in the NDI on the preoperative and postoperative 3 months. The recurrence occurred in 1 patient (2.5%) of the microscopic PCF group and 1 patient (3%) of the UBE PCF group. The revision surgery was performed in 2 patients (5%) of the microscopic PCF group and in 1 patient of the UBE PCF group. There were no significant differences in motion and instability between the two groups. Conclusions: Both microscopic and UBE PCF are effective and safe procedures for treating cervical radiculopathy due to cervical foraminal disc herniation or stenosis. The UBE approach may provide advantages mainly in early postoperative recovery, including lower early postoperative neck pain, while long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes appear comparable to those of microscopic PCF.
Keywords: posterior cervical foraminotomy; unilateral biportal endoscopy; endoscopic spine surgery; cervical radiculopathy; minimally invasive surgical procedures posterior cervical foraminotomy; unilateral biportal endoscopy; endoscopic spine surgery; cervical radiculopathy; minimally invasive surgical procedures

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, S.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Jang, J.W.; Park, C.K.; Lee, D.G. Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 4589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589

AMA Style

Han SY, Lee SH, Jang JW, Park CK, Lee DG. Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(12):4589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Sang Youp, Sang Hyub Lee, Jae Won Jang, Choon Keun Park, and Dong Geun Lee. 2026. "Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 12: 4589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589

APA Style

Han, S. Y., Lee, S. H., Jang, J. W., Park, C. K., & Lee, D. G. (2026). Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(12), 4589. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop