This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy
by
Sang Youp Han
Sang Youp Han 1,*
,
Sang Hyub Lee
Sang Hyub Lee 1
,
Jae Won Jang
Jae Won Jang 1,
Choon Keun Park
Choon Keun Park 1 and
Dong Geun Lee
Dong Geun Lee 2
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, The Leon Wiltse Memorial Hospital, Suwon 16542, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Central Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(12), 4589; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 April 2026
/
Revised: 29 May 2026
/
Accepted: 9 June 2026
/
Published: 12 June 2026
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between microscopic and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). Methods: This study included 73 patients who underwent microscopic PCF (n = 40) or UBE PCF (n = 33) for single-level cervical foraminal disc herniation or stenosis between January 2018 and December 2021. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Radiologic outcomes were evaluated with cervical range of motion (ROM) using computed tomography and flexion-extension dynamic radiography. Results: The mean follow-up period for microscopic and UBE PCF was 33.0 ± 7.6 months and 29.9 ± 5.9 months, respectively. The postoperative neck VAS until postoperative 2 weeks was significantly lower in the UBE PCF group than in the microscopic PCF group (p < 0.05). The estimated blood loss and operative time were significantly lower in the UBE PCF group than in the microscopic PCF group, while the length of hospital stay was numerically shorter but did not reach statistical significance. The two groups had no significant difference in the NDI on the preoperative and postoperative 3 months. The recurrence occurred in 1 patient (2.5%) of the microscopic PCF group and 1 patient (3%) of the UBE PCF group. The revision surgery was performed in 2 patients (5%) of the microscopic PCF group and in 1 patient of the UBE PCF group. There were no significant differences in motion and instability between the two groups. Conclusions: Both microscopic and UBE PCF are effective and safe procedures for treating cervical radiculopathy due to cervical foraminal disc herniation or stenosis. The UBE approach may provide advantages mainly in early postoperative recovery, including lower early postoperative neck pain, while long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes appear comparable to those of microscopic PCF.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Han, S.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Jang, J.W.; Park, C.K.; Lee, D.G.
Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 4589.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589
AMA Style
Han SY, Lee SH, Jang JW, Park CK, Lee DG.
Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(12):4589.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589
Chicago/Turabian Style
Han, Sang Youp, Sang Hyub Lee, Jae Won Jang, Choon Keun Park, and Dong Geun Lee.
2026. "Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 12: 4589.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589
APA Style
Han, S. Y., Lee, S. H., Jang, J. W., Park, C. K., & Lee, D. G.
(2026). Comparison of Early Postoperative Recovery and Radiologic Outcomes Between Microscopic and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(12), 4589.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15124589
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.