Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (201)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = perioperative monitoring

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 1508 KiB  
Review
Critical Care Management of Surgically Treated Gynecological Cancer Patients: Current Concepts and Future Directions
by Vasilios Pergialiotis, Philippe Morice, Vasilios Lygizos, Dimitrios Haidopoulos and Nikolaos Thomakos
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2514; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152514 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 283
Abstract
The significant advances in the surgical and medical treatment of gynecological cancer have led to improved survival outcomes of several subgroups of patients that were until recently opted out of treatment plans. Surgical cytoreduction has evolved through advanced surgical complexity procedures and the [...] Read more.
The significant advances in the surgical and medical treatment of gynecological cancer have led to improved survival outcomes of several subgroups of patients that were until recently opted out of treatment plans. Surgical cytoreduction has evolved through advanced surgical complexity procedures and the need for critical care of gynecological cancer patients has increased. Despite that, however, articles focusing on the need of perioperative monitoring of these patients completely lack from the international literature; hence, recommendations are still lacking. Critical care may be offered in different types of facilities with specific indications. These include the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), the high dependency unit (HDU) and the intensive care unit (ICU) which have discrete roles and should be used judiciously in order to avoid unnecessary increases in the hospitalization costs. In the present review we focus on the pathophysiological alterations that are expected in gynecological cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, provide current evidence and discuss indications of hospitalization as well as discharge criteria from intensive care facilities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1321 KiB  
Article
The Role of Inflammatory Biomarkers in Predicting Postoperative Fever Following Flexible Ureteroscopy
by Rasha Ahmed, Omnia Hamdy, Atallah Alatawi, A. Alhowidi, Nael Al-Dahshan, Ahmad Nouraldin Alkadah, Siddique Adnan, Abdullah Mahmoud Alali, Yazeed Hamdan O. Alwabisi, Saleh Alruwaili, Muteb Bandar Binmohaiya, Amany Ahmed Soliman and Mohamed Elbakary
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1366; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081366 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 259
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Flexible ureteroscopic surgery is a common minimally invasive procedure utilized for the management of various urological conditions. While effective, postoperative complications such as fever can occur, necessitating the identification of reliable biomarkers for early detection and management. In this [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Flexible ureteroscopic surgery is a common minimally invasive procedure utilized for the management of various urological conditions. While effective, postoperative complications such as fever can occur, necessitating the identification of reliable biomarkers for early detection and management. In this study, we specifically evaluated the predictive performance of three preoperative hematologic indices: the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune–inflammation index (SII). Materials and Methods: By systematically comparing these biomarkers through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and logistic regression modeling, we aimed to identify the most accurate predictor of postoperative fever development. Our cohort included patients who developed postoperative fever, many of whom exhibited normal WBC counts, allowing us to evaluate the discriminatory power of alternative inflammatory biomarkers. Results: Among the 150 patients, 32 developed postoperative fever. Conventional WBC counts did not predict fever, with 91% of feverish individuals having normal WBC values. In the ROC curve analysis, NLR outperformed SII (AUC 0.847, cutoff 796) and PLR (AUC 0.743, cutoff 106), with an AUC of 0.996 at 2.96. A combined logistic model achieved 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity (AUC = 0.996). Conclusions: This study addresses a critical gap in perioperative monitoring by validating readily available complete blood count-derived ratios as clinically meaningful predictors of postoperative inflammatory responses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Urology & Nephrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 275 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Different Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Regimens on Serum Electrolyte Levels: A Comparison of Oxaliplatin and Mitomycin C
by Vural Argın, Mehmet Ömer Özduman, Ahmet Orhan Sunar, Mürşit Dinçer, Aziz Serkan Senger, Selçuk Gülmez, Orhan Uzun, Mustafa Duman and Erdal Polat
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1345; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081345 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 218
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of HIPEC procedures using oxaliplatin and mitomycin C on serum electrolyte, glucose, and lactate levels, with a specific focus on the carrier solutions employed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of HIPEC procedures using oxaliplatin and mitomycin C on serum electrolyte, glucose, and lactate levels, with a specific focus on the carrier solutions employed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 82 patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the chemotherapeutic agent used: oxaliplatin (n = 63) or mitomycin C (MMC, n = 19). The oxaliplatin group was further subdivided based on the carrier solution used: 5% dextrose (D5W, n = 29) or peritoneal dialysate (n = 34). The assignment of regimens was based on institutional protocols and surgeon preference. Pre- and post-HIPEC serum levels of sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, glucose, and lactate were compared. Results: Significant biochemical changes were observed across groups, depending on both the chemotherapeutic agent and carrier solution. In the MMC group (peritoneal dialysate), only lactate increased significantly post-HIPEC (p = 0.001). In the oxaliplatin–peritoneal dialysate group, significant changes were observed in bicarbonate (p = 0.009), glucose (p = 0.001), and lactate (p < 0.001), whereas sodium and potassium remained stable. The oxaliplatin–D5W group showed significant changes in all parameters: sodium (p = 0.001), potassium (p = 0.001), bicarbonate (p = 0.001), glucose (p < 0.001), and lactate (2.4 → 7.6 mmol/L, p < 0.001). Between-group comparisons revealed significant differences in sodium, potassium, glucose, and lactate changes (p < 0.05), but not in bicarbonate (p = 0.099). Demographic and clinical characteristics—including age, sex, primary disease, ICU stay, and 90-day mortality were similar across groups. Conclusions: The use of dextrose-containing solutions with oxaliplatin was associated with marked metabolic disturbances, including clinically meaningful hyponatremia, hypokalemia, and hyperglycemia in the early postoperative period. These findings suggest that the choice of carrier solution is as important as the chemotherapeutic agent in terms of perioperative safety. Closer postoperative electrolyte monitoring is recommended when using dextrose-based regimens. The retrospective design and sample size imbalance between groups are acknowledged limitations. Nonetheless, this study offers clinically relevant insights and lays the groundwork for future prospective research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Colorectal Surgery and Oncology)
16 pages, 544 KiB  
Article
Cardiovascular Events and Preoperative Beta-Blocker Use in Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Holter-Based Analysis
by Alexandru Cosmin Palcău, Liviu Ionuț Șerbanoiu, Livia Florentina Păduraru, Alexandra Bolocan, Florentina Mușat, Daniel Ion, Dan Nicolae Păduraru, Bogdan Socea and Adriana Mihaela Ilieșiu
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1300; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071300 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 308
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The perioperative use of beta-blockers remains controversial due to conflicting evidence of their risks and benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between chronic beta-blocker (bb) therapy and perioperative cardiac events in non-cardiac surgeries using [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The perioperative use of beta-blockers remains controversial due to conflicting evidence of their risks and benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between chronic beta-blocker (bb) therapy and perioperative cardiac events in non-cardiac surgeries using 24 h continuous Holter monitoring. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing elective or emergency non-cardiac surgery at a Romanian tertiary care hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: G1 (not receiving Bb) and G2 (on chronic Bb). The incidences of perioperative cardiac events, such as severe bradycardia (<40 b/min), new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), extrasystolic arrhythmia (Ex), and sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) and arterial hypotension, were compared between the two groups using clinical, electrocardiography (ECG), and Holter ECG data. Beta-blocker indications, complications, and outcomes were analyzed using chi-squared tests and logistic regression. Results: A total of 100 consecutive patients (63% men, mean age of 53.7 years) were enrolled in the study. G2 included 30% (n = 30) of patients on chronic beta-blocker therapy. The indications included atrial fibrillation (46.7%, n = 14), arterial hypertension (36.7%, n = 11), extrasystolic arrhythmias (10%, n = 3), and chronic coronary syndrome (6.6%, n = 2). Beta-blocker use was significantly associated with severe bradycardia (n = 6; p < 0.001) in G2, whereas one patient in G1 had bradycardia, and 15 and 1 patients had hypotension (p < 0.001) in G1 and G2, respectively. The bradycardia and arterial hypotension cases were promptly treated and did not influence the patients’ prognoses. The 14 patients with AF in G2 had a 15-fold higher odds of requiring beta-blockers (p < 0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 15.145). No significant associations were found between beta-blocker use and the surgery duration (p = 0.155) or sustained ventricular tachycardia (p = 0.857). Ten patients developed paroxysmal postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), which was related to longer surgery durations (165 (150–180) vs. 120 (90–150) minutes; p = 0.002) and postoperative anemia [hemoglobin (Hg): 10.4 (9.37–12.6) vs. 12.1 (11–13.2) g/dL; p = 0.041]. Conclusions: Patients under chronic beta-blocker therapy undergoing non-cardiac surgery have a higher risk of perioperative bradycardia and hypotension. Continuous Holter monitoring proved effective in detecting transient arrhythmic events, emphasizing the need for careful perioperative surveillance of these patients, especially the elderly, in order to prevent cardiovascular complications These findings emphasize the necessity of tailored perioperative beta-blocker strategies and support further large-scale investigations to optimize risk stratification and management protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2247 KiB  
Article
Feasibility of Hypotension Prediction Index-Guided Monitoring for Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by Okechukwu Aloziem, Hsing-Hua Sylvia Lin, Kourtney Kelly, Alexandra Nicholas, Ryan C. Romeo, C. Tyler Smith, Ximiao Yu and Grace Lim
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5037; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145037 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 473
Abstract
Background: Hypotension following epidural labor analgesia (ELA) is its most common complication, affecting approximately 20% of patients and posing risks to both maternal and fetal health. As digital tools and predictive analytics increasingly shape perioperative and obstetric anesthesia practices, real-world implementation data are [...] Read more.
Background: Hypotension following epidural labor analgesia (ELA) is its most common complication, affecting approximately 20% of patients and posing risks to both maternal and fetal health. As digital tools and predictive analytics increasingly shape perioperative and obstetric anesthesia practices, real-world implementation data are needed to guide their integration into clinical care. Current monitoring practices rely on intermittent non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements, which may delay recognition and treatment of hypotension. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) algorithm uses continuous arterial waveform monitoring to predict hypotension for potentially earlier intervention. This clinical trial evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of continuous HPI-guided treatment in reducing time-to-treatment for ELA-associated hypotension and improving maternal hemodynamics. Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial design involving healthy pregnant individuals receiving ELA. Participants were randomized into two groups: Group CM (conventional monitoring with NIBP) and Group HPI (continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring). In Group HPI, hypotension treatment was guided by HPI output; in Group CM, treatment was based on NIBP readings. Feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability outcomes were assessed among subjects and their bedside nurse using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) instruments. The primary efficacy outcome was time-to-treatment of hypotension, defined as the duration between onset of hypotension and administration of a vasopressor or fluid therapy. This outcome was chosen to evaluate the clinical responsiveness enabled by HPI monitoring. Hypotension is defined as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg for more than 1 min in Group CM and an HPI threshold < 75 for more than 1 min in Group HPI. Secondary outcomes included total time in hypotension, vasopressor doses, and hemodynamic parameters. Results: There were 30 patients (Group HPI, n = 16; Group CM, n = 14) included in the final analysis. Subjects and clinicians alike rated the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the continuous monitoring device highly, with median scores ≥ 4 across all domains, indicating favorable perceptions of the intervention. The cumulative probability of time-to-treatment of hypotension was lower by 75 min after ELA initiation in Group HPI (65%) than Group CM (71%), although this difference was not statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.66). Mixed models indicated trends that Group HPI had higher cardiac output (β = 0.58, 95% confidence interval −0.18 to 1.34, p = 0.13) and lower systemic vascular resistance (β = −97.22, 95% confidence interval −200.84 to 6.40, p = 0.07) throughout the monitoring period. No differences were found in total vasopressor use or intravenous fluid administration. Conclusions: Continuous monitoring and precision hypotension treatment is feasible, appropriate, and acceptable to both patients and clinicians in a labor and delivery setting. These hypothesis-generating results support that HPI-guided treatment may be associated with hemodynamic trends that warrant further investigation to determine definitive efficacy in labor analgesia contexts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 919 KiB  
Article
Use of Bone Bank Grafts in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Patient Characteristics at a Referral Center
by Thiago de Carvalho Gontijo, Luiz Octávio Pereira Xavier, Lucas Carneiro Morais, Gustavo Waldolato Silva, Janaíne Cunha Polese, Raquel Bandeira da Silva and Amanda Aparecida Oliveira Leopoldino
Medicina 2025, 61(7), 1246; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61071246 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 224
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To characterize the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using bone allografts from a tissue bank, and to identify clinical and surgical factors associated with the selection of graft type in cases of severe periprosthetic [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: To characterize the epidemiological profile of patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using bone allografts from a tissue bank, and to identify clinical and surgical factors associated with the selection of graft type in cases of severe periprosthetic bone loss. Materials and Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study involved a retrospective review of medical records from a specialized referral center, including revision THA procedures performed between 2013 and 2019. Data were collected on 36 variables covering demographic details (age, sex), surgical history of both hips, comorbidities, medication use, perioperative complications, hospitalization, surgical technique, and characteristics of the bone grafts used. Patients were grouped based on the type of allograft received—structured or morselized (impacted)—and comparative analyses were performed. Results: A total of 67 revision THA cases were evaluated, with a mean patient age of 63.2 years. Nearly half (47.8%) had no prior hip revision. The average number of previous procedures per patient was 1.73, and the mean interval from primary THA to revision was 178.4 months. Morselized bone allografts were used in 66.7% of cases, and structured allografts in 33.3%. Patients receiving structured grafts had undergone a significantly higher number of prior surgeries (p = 0.01) and had a longer duration since the initial THA (p = 0.04). Conclusions: These findings suggest that younger patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty may be at increased risk for complex revision procedures involving structured grafts later in life, underscoring the need for long-term monitoring and tailored surgical planning in this population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Techniques, Risks and Recovery of Hip Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1006 KiB  
Case Report
The Potential Advantages of Remimazolam for Awakening in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of Cases
by Sung-Hye Byun, Jinsong Yeo and Sou-Hyun Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4724; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134724 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 372
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires sedation strategies that enable rapid and reliable awakening during intraoperative electrophysiological testing. Although propofol and dexmedetomidine are commonly used, their lack of pharmacological antagonists might delay recovery. In this retrospective case series, we assessed the [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires sedation strategies that enable rapid and reliable awakening during intraoperative electrophysiological testing. Although propofol and dexmedetomidine are commonly used, their lack of pharmacological antagonists might delay recovery. In this retrospective case series, we assessed the effects of using remimazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine that is reversible with flumazenil. No existing research has determined whether this may represent a clinically advantageous alternative. Materials and Methods: Six patients who underwent DBS surgery with monitored anesthetic care between May and August 2024 were included. Two patients received dexmedetomidine and propofol combined, whereas four received remimazolam for initial sedation. The time from sedation discontinuation to intraoperative electrophysiological examination, postoperative hospital stays, and perioperative complications were evaluated. Results: Patients who received remimazolam had shorter awakening intervals (median 17 min) compared to those who received dexmedetomidine and propofol (median 50 min), with a large effect size difference (Cliff’s delta −1.00). In all cases of remimazolam, patients were administered flumazenil to facilitate awakening, and transient hypertension requiring nicardipine was observed in some patients. Among the patients who underwent unilateral DBS, those who received remimazolam had shorter postoperative hospital stays (5–7 days) than the patient who received dexmedetomidine and propofol (9 days). No patient had complications. Conclusions: This small retrospective case series indicated that remimazolam, when reversed with flumazenil, was associated with rapid awakening compared with dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients undergoing DBS surgery. However, these findings require validation in larger prospective studies due to the small sample size. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 886 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Two Initial Effect-Site Concentrations of Remifentanil with Propofol During Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Under Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Randomized Controlled Study with Titration-Based Adjustment
by Shih-Syuan Lin, Zhi-Fu Wu, Hou-Chuan Lai, Ching-Lung Ko, Ting-Yi Sun, Kun-Ting Hong, Kai-Li Lo, Tzu-Hsuan Yeh and Wei-Cheng Tseng
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4669; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134669 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 378
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is often performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) using a combination of propofol and remifentanil. However, the effects of different remifentanil effect-site concentrations (Ce) combined with propofol on perioperative outcomes in this procedure have not been reported. Methods: In [...] Read more.
Background: Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is often performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) using a combination of propofol and remifentanil. However, the effects of different remifentanil effect-site concentrations (Ce) combined with propofol on perioperative outcomes in this procedure have not been reported. Methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 80 patients scheduled for single-level PVP under MAC were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive propofol (Ce: 2.0 mcg/mL) combined with either a low (1.0 ng/mL; Group 1) or high (2.0 ng/mL; Group 2) remifentanil Ce. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative patient movement; secondary outcomes included hemodynamic stability, perioperative adverse events, anesthetic consumption, frequency of dose adjustments, postoperative recovery, and anesthesia satisfaction. Results: Group 2 exhibited significantly fewer episodes of patient movement during the procedure and better intraoperative hemodynamic stability. Additionally, fewer upward adjustments in remifentanil infusion were observed in Group 2. Although the total propofol consumption was similar between the groups, Group 2 required a significantly lower propofol Ce to achieve adequate sedation. Surgeon satisfaction with anesthesia was also significantly higher in Group 2. Conclusions: Using a higher remifentanil Ce (2.0 ng/mL) in combination with propofol during PVP under MAC reduces patient movement and improves intraoperative hemodynamic stability without increasing adverse events. This regimen may thereby enhance procedural efficiency and surgeon satisfaction during vertebral interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2337 KiB  
Review
Narrative Review on the Management of Neck of Femur Fractures in People Living with HIV: Challenges, Complications, and Long-Term Outcomes
by Yashar Mashayekhi, Chibuchi Amadi-Livingstone, Abdulmalik Timamy, Mohammed Eish, Ahmed Attia, Maria Panourgia, Dushyant Mital, Oliver Pearce and Mohamed H. Ahmed
Microorganisms 2025, 13(7), 1530; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071530 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 586
Abstract
Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a critical orthopaedic emergency with a high morbidity and mortality prevalence, particularly in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLWHIV). A combination of HIV infection, combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), and compromised bone health further increases the risk [...] Read more.
Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a critical orthopaedic emergency with a high morbidity and mortality prevalence, particularly in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLWHIV). A combination of HIV infection, combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), and compromised bone health further increases the risk of fragility fractures. Additionally, HIV-related immune dysfunction, cART-induced osteoporosis, and perioperative infection risks further pose challenges in ongoing surgical management. Despite the rising global prevalence of PLWHIV, no specific guidelines exist for the perioperative and post-operative care of PLWHIV undergoing NOF fracture surgery. This narrative review synthesises the current literature on the surgical management of NOF fractures in PLWHIV, focusing on pre-operative considerations, intraoperative strategies, post-operative complications, and long-term outcomes. It also explores infection control, fracture healing dynamics, and ART’s impact on surgical outcomes while identifying key research gaps. A systematic database search (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) identified relevant studies published up to February 2025. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies on incidence, risk factors, ART impact, and NOF fracture outcomes in PLWHIV. Data were analysed to summarise findings and highlight knowledge gaps. Pre-operative care: Optimisation involves assessing immune status (namely, CD4 counts and HIV-1 viral loads), bone health, and cART to minimise surgical risk. Immunodeficiency increases surgical site and periprosthetic infection risks, necessitating potential enhanced antibiotic prophylaxis and close monitoring of potential start/switch/stopping of such therapies. Surgical management of neck of femur (NOF) fractures in PLWHIV should be individualised based on fracture type (intracapsular or extracapsular), age, immune status, bone quality, and functional status. Extracapsular fractures are generally managed with internal fixation using dynamic hip screws or intramedullary nails. For intracapsular fractures, internal fixation may be appropriate for younger patients with good bone quality, though there is an increased risk of non-union in this group. Hemiarthroplasty is typically favoured in older or frailer individuals, offering reduced surgical stress and lower operative time. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered for active patients or those with pre-existing hip joint disease but carries a higher infection risk in immunocompromised individuals. Multidisciplinary evaluation is critical in guiding the most suitable surgical approach for PLWHIV. Importantly, post-operative care carries the risk of higher infection rates, requiring prolonged antibiotic use and wound surveillance. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) contributes to bone demineralisation and chronic inflammation, increasing delayed union healing and non-union risk. HIV-related frailty, neurocognitive impairment, and socioeconomic barriers hinder rehabilitation, affecting recovery. The management of NOF fractures in PLWHIV requires a multidisciplinary, patient-centred approach ideally comprising a team of Orthopaedic surgeon, HIV Physician, Orthogeriatric care, Physiotherapy, Occupational Health, Dietitian, Pharmacist, Psychologist, and related Social Care. Optimising cART, tailoring surgical strategies, and enforcing strict infection control can improve outcomes. Further high-quality studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are essential to develop evidence-based guidelines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Virology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 509 KiB  
Review
Respiratory Depression in Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: An Overview
by Isabel E. Royz, Nicholas B. Clevenger, Andrew Bochenek, Andrew R. Locke and Steven B. Greenberg
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4528; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134528 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 615
Abstract
Non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) is a rapidly growing domain for anesthesia professionals due to advances in procedural technology and increased emphasis on patient comfort. The majority of these procedures are conducted under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) where patients receive varying levels of sedation. [...] Read more.
Non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) is a rapidly growing domain for anesthesia professionals due to advances in procedural technology and increased emphasis on patient comfort. The majority of these procedures are conducted under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) where patients receive varying levels of sedation. Analysis of the Anesthesia Closed Claims database suggests that adverse respiratory events continue to be the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing NORA procedures. Most NORA claims occurred under MAC, with oversedation leading to respiratory depression coupled with inadequate monitoring making up the majority of claims. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) has released standards of pre-anesthesia, intraoperative monitoring, and post-anesthesia care, which apply to all anesthetizing locations including NORA. The ASA has also made recommendations in a statement on NORA to promote patient safety. Evidence suggests that patient characteristics, monitoring tools, physical constraints, and team familiarity play a role in the risk for adverse respiratory events. Future studies are required to further understand the challenges specific to NORA locations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Anesthesiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 915 KiB  
Review
The Perioperative Biochemical and Clinical Considerations of Pheochromocytoma Management
by Alexa J. Gombert, Alexandra M. Nerantzinis, Jennifer Li, Weidong Wang, Isaac Y. Yeung, Ana Costa and Sergio D. Bergese
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6080; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136080 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 813
Abstract
Pheochromocytoma, a rare catecholamine-secreting tumor, poses significant perioperative challenges due to its potential for severe hemodynamic instability. Careful management of patients with pheochromocytoma is critical for patient safety and favorable outcomes. The diagnostic workup focuses on biochemical analysis of plasma or urinary metanephrines, [...] Read more.
Pheochromocytoma, a rare catecholamine-secreting tumor, poses significant perioperative challenges due to its potential for severe hemodynamic instability. Careful management of patients with pheochromocytoma is critical for patient safety and favorable outcomes. The diagnostic workup focuses on biochemical analysis of plasma or urinary metanephrines, followed by imaging for tumor localization and genetic testing to identify hereditary syndromes. Preoperative management emphasizes adequate alpha-adrenergic blockade followed by beta-blockade to stabilize cardiovascular function. Anesthetic planning requires meticulous attention to volume status, cardiovascular optimization, and intraoperative monitoring to mitigate the risks of hypertensive crises and hypotension. Postoperative care must account for ongoing hemodynamic and metabolic fluctuations. A multidisciplinary, protocol-driven approach is essential to improve outcomes in patients undergoing pheochromocytoma resection. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the genetic, biochemical, clinical, and anesthetic considerations involved in the diagnosis and perioperative management of pheochromocytoma. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 873 KiB  
Review
Beyond Endoleaks: A Holistic Management Approach to Late Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Ruptures After Endovascular Repair
by Rafic Ramses and Obiekezie Agu
J. Vasc. Dis. 2025, 4(3), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd4030024 - 22 Jun 2025
Viewed by 346
Abstract
Late ruptures of abdominal aortic aneurysms post-endovascular aneurysm repair present a significant risk, occurring in about 0.9% of cases. The typical timeframe leading to rupture is roughly 37 months, with the primary factors often linked to endoleaks, especially types I and III, which [...] Read more.
Late ruptures of abdominal aortic aneurysms post-endovascular aneurysm repair present a significant risk, occurring in about 0.9% of cases. The typical timeframe leading to rupture is roughly 37 months, with the primary factors often linked to endoleaks, especially types I and III, which sustain pressure within the aneurysm sac. The approaches to managing late ruptures consist of endovascular approaches, open surgical interventions, and conservative care, each customised to the patient’s specific characteristics. When feasible endovascular repair is favoured, additional stent grafts are deployed to seal endoleaks and offer lower perioperative mortality rates compared to those for open surgery. Open repair is considered when endovascular solutions fail or are not feasible. Conservative management with active monitoring and supportive treatment can be considered for haemodynamically stable non-surgical patients. Endovascular repair methods like fenestrated/branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) and parallel grafting (PGEVAR) are effective for complicated anatomies and show high technical success with reduced morbidity compared to that with open repairs. Chimney techniques and physician-modified endografts may help regain and broaden the sealing zone. Limb extensions with or without embolisation, interposition endografting, and whole-body relining are helpful options for type IB and type 3–5 endoleaks. Open surgical repair carries a higher perioperative mortality but may be essential in preventing death due to rupture following failed EVAR. The choice depends on the patient’s clinical stability and fitness for surgery in the absence of a viable endovascular alternative. This article discusses the available options for treating late rupture after EVAR, emphasising the importance of individualised treatment plans and the need for rigorous postoperative surveillance to prevent such complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Peripheral Vascular Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 6359 KiB  
Case Report
3D Model-Guided Robot-Assisted Giant Presacral Ganglioneuroma Exeresis by a Uro-Neurosurgeons Team: A Case Report
by Leonardo Bradaschia, Federico Lavagno, Paolo Gontero, Diego Garbossa and Francesca Vincitorio
Reports 2025, 8(3), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8030099 - 20 Jun 2025
Viewed by 500
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Robotic surgery reduces the need for extensive surgical approaches and lowers perioperative complications. In particular, it offers enhanced dexterity, three-dimensional visualization, and improved precision in confined anatomical spaces. Pelvic masses pose significant challenges due to their close relationship with [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Robotic surgery reduces the need for extensive surgical approaches and lowers perioperative complications. In particular, it offers enhanced dexterity, three-dimensional visualization, and improved precision in confined anatomical spaces. Pelvic masses pose significant challenges due to their close relationship with critical neurovascular structures, making traditional open or laparoscopic approaches more invasive and potentially riskier. Robot-assisted resection, combined with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, may therefore offer a safe and effective solution for the management of complex pelvic lesions. Case Presentation: An 18-year-old woman was incidentally diagnosed with an 11 cm asymptomatic pelvic mass located anterior to the sacrum. Initial differential diagnoses included neurofibroma, teratoma, and myelolipoma. Histopathological examination confirmed a ganglioneuroma. Following multidisciplinary discussion, the patient underwent a robot-assisted en bloc resection using the Da Vinci Xi multiport system. Preoperative planning was aided by 3D modeling and intraoperative navigation. Conclusions: Surgery lasted 322 min. Preoperative and postoperative eGFR values were 145.2 mL/min and 144.0 mL/min, respectively. The lesion measured 11 cm × 9 cm × 8 cm. The main intraoperative complication was a controlled breach of the iliac vein due to its close adherence to the mass. No major postoperative complications occurred (Clavien-Dindo Grade I). The drain was removed on postoperative day 3, and the bladder catheter on day 2. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without further complications. Presacral ganglioneuromas are rare neoplasms in a surgically complex area. A multidisciplinary approach using robotic-assisted laparoscopy with nerve monitoring enables safe, minimally invasive resection. This strategy may help avoid open surgery and reduce the risk of neurological and vascular injury. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 414 KiB  
Article
Fast-Track Protocol for Carotid Surgery
by Noemi Baronetto, Stefano Brizzi, Arianna Pignataro, Fulvio Nisi, Enrico Giustiniano, David Barillà and Efrem Civilini
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4294; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124294 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 685
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Fast-track (FT) protocols have been developed to reduce the surgical burden and enhance recovery, but they still need to be established for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In this scenario, carotid stenting has gained momentum by answering the need for a less invasive treatment, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Fast-track (FT) protocols have been developed to reduce the surgical burden and enhance recovery, but they still need to be established for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In this scenario, carotid stenting has gained momentum by answering the need for a less invasive treatment, despite a still debated clinical advantage. We aim to propose a FT protocol for CEA and to analyze its clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, monocentric study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis using an FT protocol between January 2016 and December 2024. Patients undergoing CEA for symptomatic carotid stenosis, carotid bypass procedures, and combined interventions were excluded. Our FT protocol comprises same-day hospital admission, exclusive use of local anesthesia, non-invasive assessment of cardiac and neurological status, and selective utilization of cervical drainage. Discharge criteria were goal-directed and included the absence of pain, electrocardiographic abnormalities, hemodynamic instability, neck hematoma, or cranial nerve injury, with a structured plan for rapid readmission if required. Postoperative pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), administered to all patients. The perioperative clinical impact of the protocol was evaluated based on complication rates, pain control, length of hospital stay, and early readmission rates. Results: Among 1051 patients who underwent CEA, 853 met the inclusion criteria. General anesthesia was required in 17 cases (2%), while a cervical drain was placed in 83 patients (10%). The eversion technique was employed in 765 cases (90%). Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring was necessary for 7 patients (1%). The mean length of hospital stay was 1.17 days. Postoperatively, 17 patients (2%) required surgical revision. Minor stroke occurred in three patients (0.4%), and acute myocardial infarction requiring angioplasty in two patients (0.2%). Inadequate postoperative pain control (NRS > 4) was reported by five patients (0.6%). Hospital readmission was required for one patient due to a neck hematoma. Conclusions: The reported fast-track protocol for elective carotid surgery was associated with a low rate of postoperative complications. These findings support its clinical value and highlight the need for further validation through controlled comparative studies. Furthermore, the implementation of fast-track protocols in carotid surgery should prompt comparative medico-economic research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 601 KiB  
Article
Serum Presepsin Might Not Detect Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip Arthroplasty
by Kohei Hashimoto, Takkan Morishima, Kazutaka Watanabe, Tatsunori Ikemoto, Yukio Nakamura and Nobunori Takahashi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4246; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124246 - 14 Jun 2025
Viewed by 434
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the normative perioperative plasmatic levels of presepsin in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to evaluate whether presepsin measurements can effectively distinguish the presence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following THA. [...] Read more.
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the normative perioperative plasmatic levels of presepsin in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to evaluate whether presepsin measurements can effectively distinguish the presence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following THA. Methods: In study 1, we evaluated multiple inflammatory markers before and at several time points after surgery in 31 primary THA patients. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare sequential changes in each variable followed by the Sheffe post hoc comparison. In study 2, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the inflammatory markers for PJI using five cases with confirmed PJI without bacteremia. ROC curve analysis was performed comparing these PJI cases with the 31 preoperative cases from study 1. Results: In study 1, presepsin levels were not significantly different from the baseline throughout the monitoring period. In study 2, the AUCs of CRP (1.0, p < 0.001) and ESR-1h (0.83, p < 0.05) in the ROC curve were able to discriminate PJI, but those of presepsin (0.51, p = 0.96) and WBC (0.65, p = 0.28) failed to discriminate PJI. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that presepsin levels remain stable following THA and may have limited utility in detecting periprosthetic joint infection, particularly in the absence of systemic infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop