Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = peptide PROTACs

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
34 pages, 765 KB  
Review
Transcription Factors and Methods for the Pharmacological Correction of Their Activity
by Svetlana V. Guryanova, Tatiana V. Maksimova and Madina M. Azova
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6394; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136394 - 2 Jul 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3702
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that control gene expression by binding to specific DNA sequences and are essential for cell development, differentiation, and homeostasis. Dysregulation of TFs is implicated in numerous diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disorders, and neurodegeneration. While TFs were traditionally considered [...] Read more.
Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that control gene expression by binding to specific DNA sequences and are essential for cell development, differentiation, and homeostasis. Dysregulation of TFs is implicated in numerous diseases, including cancer, autoimmune disorders, and neurodegeneration. While TFs were traditionally considered “undruggable” due to their lack of well-defined binding pockets, recent advances have made it possible to modulate their activity using diverse pharmacological strategies. Major TF families include NF-κB, p53, STATs, HIF-1α, AP-1, Nrf2, and nuclear hormone receptors, which take part in the regulation of inflammation, tumor suppression, cytokine signaling, hypoxia and stress response, oxidative stress, and hormonal response, respectively. TFs can perform multiple functions, participating in the regulation of opposing processes depending on the context. NF-κB, for instance, plays dual roles in immunity and cancer, and is targeted by proteasome and IKKβ inhibitors. p53, often mutated in cancer, is reactivated using MDM2 antagonist Nutlin-3, refunctionalizing compound APR-246, or stapled peptides. HIF-1α, which regulates hypoxic responses and angiogenesis, is inhibited by agents like acriflavine or stabilized in anemia therapies by HIF-PHD inhibitor roxadustat. STATs, especially STAT3 and STAT5, are oncogenic and targeted via JAK inhibitors or novel PROTAC degraders, for instance SD-36. AP-1, implicated in cancer and arthritis, can be inhibited by T-5224 or kinase inhibitors JNK and p38 MAPK. Nrf2, a key antioxidant regulator, can be activated by agents like DMF or inhibited in chemoresistant tumors. Pharmacological strategies include direct inhibitors, activators, PROTACs, molecular glues, and epigenetic modulators. Challenges remain, including the structural inaccessibility of TFs, functional redundancy, off-target effects, and delivery barriers. Despite these challenges, transcription factor modulation is emerging as a viable and promising therapeutic approach, with ongoing research focusing on specificity, safety, and efficient delivery methods to realize its full clinical potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Research in Pharmacological Therapies, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 715 KB  
Review
Molecular Design of Novel Protein-Degrading Therapeutics Agents Currently in Clinical Trial
by Ela Kacin and Raj Nayan Sewduth
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(6), 744; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17060744 - 5 Jun 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2599
Abstract
The landscape of clinical trials aimed at targeting specific proteins has experienced significant advancements, presenting promising opportunities for the development of effective therapeutics across a range of diseases. These trials focus on the investigation of modulation of protein functions, utilizing innovative technologies such [...] Read more.
The landscape of clinical trials aimed at targeting specific proteins has experienced significant advancements, presenting promising opportunities for the development of effective therapeutics across a range of diseases. These trials focus on the investigation of modulation of protein functions, utilizing innovative technologies such as PROTACs (Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras) and other protein degraders. These innovative approaches aim to address previously undruggable targets, enhancing the specificity and efficacy of treatments. The current landscape of clinical trials encompasses a diverse array of therapeutic areas, including oncology, autoimmune diseases, and neurological disorders. For instance, drugs like ARV-471 and ARV-110 are in advanced phases for treating metastatic breast cancer and prostate cancer, respectively, by targeting estrogen and androgen receptors. Early-phase trials explored the potential of targeting proteins like IKZF1/3 in multiple myeloma and IRAK4 in autoimmune diseases. The conducted trials not only emphasize the therapeutic potential of protein degradation but also highlight the challenges associated with bioavailability, stability, and delivery mechanisms. As these clinical trials advance, they possess the potential to transform treatment paradigms, providing renewed hope for patients facing complex and refractory conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Targeting and Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4899 KB  
Review
Targeting the Undruggable: Recent Progress in PROTAC-Induced Transcription Factor Degradation
by Hyein Jung and Yeongju Lee
Cancers 2025, 17(11), 1871; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111871 - 3 Jun 2025
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 6480
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) play central roles in gene regulation and disease progression but have long been considered undruggable due to the absence of well-defined binding pockets and their reliance on protein–protein or protein–DNA interactions. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) offer a novel strategy to overcome [...] Read more.
Transcription factors (TFs) play central roles in gene regulation and disease progression but have long been considered undruggable due to the absence of well-defined binding pockets and their reliance on protein–protein or protein–DNA interactions. Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) offer a novel strategy to overcome these limitations by inducing selective degradation of TFs via the ubiquitin–proteasome system. This review highlights recent advances in TF-targeting PROTACs, focusing on key oncogenic TFs such as androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), BRD4, c-Myc, and STAT family members. Strategies for ligand design—including small molecules, peptides, and nucleic acid-based elements—are discussed alongside the use of various E3 ligases such as VHL, CRBN, and IAP. Several clinically advanced PROTACs, including ARV-110 and ARV-471, demonstrate the therapeutic potential of this technology. Despite challenges in pharmacokinetics and E3 ligase selection, emerging data suggest that PROTACs can successfully target TFs, paving the way for new treatment strategies across oncology and other disease areas. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs))
Show Figures

Figure 1

53 pages, 2354 KB  
Review
Negative Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
by Magda Drewniak-Świtalska, Paulina Fortuna and Małgorzata Krzystek-Korpacka
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(6), 713; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17060713 - 28 May 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2818
Abstract
Checkpoint inhibitors are a modern therapeutic approach for treating various types of cancer, metabolic diseases, and chronic infections. The main goal of this therapy is to specifically unlock the immune system, allowing it to recognize and eliminate cancer cells or pathogens, primarily through [...] Read more.
Checkpoint inhibitors are a modern therapeutic approach for treating various types of cancer, metabolic diseases, and chronic infections. The main goal of this therapy is to specifically unlock the immune system, allowing it to recognize and eliminate cancer cells or pathogens, primarily through the activation of T lymphocytes. Monoclonal antibodies used in the treatment of various cancers, such as pembrolizumab (Keytruda), nivolumab (Opdivo), and ipilimumab (Yervoy), carry several limitations, primarily due to their large molecular size. The main challenges include limited tissue penetration, long half-life in the body, and the risk of autoimmune responses. Compared to antibodies, small-molecule and peptide inhibitors offer significant advantages related to their molecular structure. These drugs demonstrate a better ability to penetrate hard-to-reach areas, such as the tumor microenvironments, can be administered orally, and often show lower immunogenicity. A new generation of drugs is PROTACs, which combine the ability to direct proteins to degradation with the action of checkpoint inhibitors, contributing to the elimination of proteins responsible for suppressing the immune response. This publication describes small-molecule inhibitors, peptide inhibitors, and PROTAC molecules targeting negative immune checkpoints—CTLA-4, PD-1, VISTA, TIM-3, BTLA-4, LAG-3, and TIGIT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Targeting and Design)
Show Figures

Figure 1

136 pages, 24434 KB  
Perspective
Alzheimer’s Is a Multiform Disease of Sustained Neuronal Integrated Stress Response Driven by the C99 Fragment Generated Independently of AβPP; Proteolytic Production of Aβ Is Suppressed in AD-Affected Neurons: Evolution of a Theory
by Vladimir Volloch and Sophia Rits-Volloch
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4252; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094252 - 29 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2587
Abstract
The present Perspective analyzes the remarkable evolution of the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis 2.0 (ACH2.0) theory of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) since its inception a few years ago, as reflected in the diminishing role of amyloid-beta (Aβ) in the disease. In the initial iteration of [...] Read more.
The present Perspective analyzes the remarkable evolution of the Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis 2.0 (ACH2.0) theory of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) since its inception a few years ago, as reflected in the diminishing role of amyloid-beta (Aβ) in the disease. In the initial iteration of the ACH2.0, Aβ-protein-precursor (AβPP)-derived intraneuronal Aβ (iAβ), accumulated to neuronal integrated stress response (ISR)-eliciting levels, triggers AD. The neuronal ISR, in turn, activates the AβPP-independent production of its C99 fragment that is processed into iAβ, which drives the disease. The second iteration of the ACH2.0 stemmed from the realization that AD is, in fact, a disease of the sustained neuronal ISR. It introduced two categories of AD—conventional and unconventional—differing mainly in the manner of their causation. The former is caused by the neuronal ISR triggered by AβPP-derived iAβ, whereas in the latter, the neuronal ISR is elicited by stressors distinct from AβPP-derived iAβ and arising from brain trauma, viral and bacterial infections, and various types of inflammation. Moreover, conventional AD always contains an unconventional component, and in both forms, the disease is driven by iAβ generated independently of AβPP. In its third, the current, iteration, the ACH2.0 posits that proteolytic production of Aβ is suppressed in AD-affected neurons and that the disease is driven by C99 generated independently of AβPP. Suppression of Aβ production in AD seems an oxymoron: Aβ is equated with AD, and the later is inconceivable without the former in an ingrained Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis (ACH)-based notion. But suppression of Aβ production in AD-affected neurons is where the logic leads, and to follow it we only need to overcome the inertia of the preexisting assumptions. Moreover, not only is the generation of Aβ suppressed, so is the production of all components of the AβPP proteolytic pathway. This assertion is not a quantum leap (unless overcoming the inertia counts as such): the global cellular protein synthesis is severely suppressed under the neuronal ISR conditions, and there is no reason for constituents of the AβPP proteolytic pathway to be exempted, and they, apparently, are not, as indicated by the empirical data. In contrast, tau protein translation persists in AD-affected neurons under ISR conditions because the human tau mRNA contains an internal ribosomal entry site in its 5′UTR. In current mouse models, iAβ derived from AβPP expressed exogenously from human transgenes elicits the neuronal ISR and thus suppresses its own production. Its levels cannot principally reach AD pathology-causing levels regardless of the number of transgenes or the types of FAD mutations that they (or additional transgenes) carry. Since the AβPP-independent C99 production pathway is inoperative in mice, the current transgenic models have no potential for developing the full spectrum of AD pathology. What they display are only effects of the AβPP-derived iAβ-elicited neuronal ISR. The paper describes strategies to construct adequate transgenic AD models. It also details the utilization of human neuronal cells as the only adequate model system currently available for conventional and unconventional AD. The final alteration of the ACH2.0, introduced in the present Perspective, is that AβPP, which supports neuronal functionality and viability, is, after all, potentially produced in AD-affected neurons, albeit not conventionally but in an ISR-driven and -compatible process. Thus, the present narrative begins with the “omnipotent” Aβ capable of both triggering and driving the disease and ends up with this peptide largely dislodged from its pedestal and retaining its central role in triggering the disease in only one, although prevalent (conventional), category of AD (and driving it in none). Among interesting inferences of the present Perspective is the determination that “sporadic AD” is not sporadic at all (“non-familial” would be a much better designation). The term has fatalistic connotations, implying that the disease can strike at random. This is patently not the case: The conventional disease affects a distinct subpopulation, and the basis for unconventional AD is well understood. Another conclusion is that, unless prevented, the occurrence of conventional AD is inevitable given a sufficiently long lifespan. This Perspective also defines therapeutic directions not to be taken as well as auspicious ways forward. The former category includes ACH-based drugs (those interfering with the proteolytic production of Aβ and/or depleting extracellular Aβ). They are legitimate (albeit inefficient) preventive agents for conventional AD. There is, however, a proverbial snowball’s chance in hell of them being effective in symptomatic AD, lecanemab, donanemab, and any other “…mab” or “…stat” notwithstanding. They comprise Aβ-specific antibodies, inhibitors of beta- and gamma-secretase, and modulators of the latter. In the latter category, among ways to go are the following: (1) Depletion of iAβ, which, if sufficiently “deep”, opens up a tantalizing possibility of once-in-a-lifetime preventive transient treatment for conventional AD and aging-associated cognitive decline, AACD. (2) Composite therapy comprising the degradation of C99/iAβ and concurrent inhibition of the neuronal ISR. A single transient treatment could be sufficient to arrest the progression of conventional AD and prevent its recurrence for life. Multiple recurrent treatments would achieve the same outcome in unconventional AD. Alternatively, the sustained reduction/removal of unconventional neuronal ISR-eliciting stressors through the elimination of their source would convert unconventional AD into conventional one, preventable/treatable by a single transient administration of the composite C99/iAβ depletion/ISR suppression therapy. Efficient and suitable ISR inhibitors are available, and it is explicitly clear where to look for C99/iAβ-specific targeted degradation agents—activators of BACE1 and, especially, BACE2. Directly acting C99/iAβ-specific degradation agents such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) and molecular-glue degraders (MGDs) are also viable options. (3) A circumscribed shift (either upstream or downstream) of the position of transcription start site (TSS) of the human AβPP gene, or, alternatively, a gene editing-mediated excision or replacement of a small, defined segment of its portion encoding 5′-untranslated region of AβPP mRNA; targeting AβPP RNA with anti-antisense oligonucleotides is another possibility. If properly executed, these RNA-based strategies would not interfere with the protein-coding potential of AβPP mRNA, and each would be capable of both preventing and stopping the AβPP-independent generation of C99 and thus of either preventing AD or arresting the progression of the disease in its conventional and unconventional forms. The paper is interspersed with “validation” sections: every conceptually significant notion is either validated by the existing data or an experimental procedure validating it is proposed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 492 KB  
Review
Recent Advances in Peptide Drug Discovery: Novel Strategies and Targeted Protein Degradation
by Katarina Vrbnjak and Raj Nayan Sewduth
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(11), 1486; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16111486 - 20 Nov 2024
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 6137
Abstract
Recent technological advancements, including computer-assisted drug discovery, gene-editing techniques, and high-throughput screening approaches, have greatly expanded the palette of methods for the discovery of peptides available to researchers. These emerging strategies, driven by recent advances in bioinformatics and multi-omics, have significantly improved the [...] Read more.
Recent technological advancements, including computer-assisted drug discovery, gene-editing techniques, and high-throughput screening approaches, have greatly expanded the palette of methods for the discovery of peptides available to researchers. These emerging strategies, driven by recent advances in bioinformatics and multi-omics, have significantly improved the efficiency of peptide drug discovery when compared with traditional in vitro and in vivo methods, cutting costs and improving their reliability. An added benefit of peptide-based drugs is the ability to precisely target protein–protein interactions, which are normally a particularly challenging aspect of drug discovery. Another recent breakthrough in this field is targeted protein degradation through proteolysis-targeting chimeras. These revolutionary compounds represent a noteworthy advancement over traditional small-molecule inhibitors due to their unique mechanism of action, which allows for the degradation of specific proteins with unprecedented specificity. The inclusion of a peptide as a protein-of-interest-targeting moiety allows for improved versatility and the possibility of targeting otherwise undruggable proteins. In this review, we discuss various novel wet-lab and computational multi-omic methods for peptide drug discovery, provide an overview of therapeutic agents discovered through these cutting-edge techniques, and discuss the potential for the therapeutic delivery of peptide-based drugs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1476 KB  
Article
Cyclosporin A-Based PROTACs Can Deplete Abundant Cellular Cyclophilin A without Suppressing T Cell Activation
by Katharina Hilbig, Russell Towers, Marc Schmitz, Martin Bornhäuser, Petra Lennig and Yixin Zhang
Molecules 2024, 29(12), 2779; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29122779 - 11 Jun 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3191
Abstract
Cyclophilin A (CypA), the cellular receptor of the immunosuppressant cyclosporin A (CsA), is an abundant cytosolic protein and is involved in a variety of diseases. For example, CypA supports cancer proliferation and mediates viral infections, such as the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). [...] Read more.
Cyclophilin A (CypA), the cellular receptor of the immunosuppressant cyclosporin A (CsA), is an abundant cytosolic protein and is involved in a variety of diseases. For example, CypA supports cancer proliferation and mediates viral infections, such as the human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). Here, we present the design of PROTAC (proteolysis targeting chimera) compounds against CypA to induce its intracellular proteolysis and to investigate their effect on immune cells. Interestingly, upon connecting to E3 ligase ligands, both peptide-based low-affinity binders and CsA-based high-affinity binders can degrade CypA at nM concentration in HeLa cells and fibroblast cells. As the immunosuppressive effect of CsA is not directly associated with the binding of CsA to CypA but the inhibition of phosphatase calcineurin by the CypA:CsA complex, we investigated whether a CsA-based PROTAC compound could induce CypA degradation without affecting the activation of immune cells. P3, the most efficient PROTAC compound discovered from this study, could deplete CypA in lymphocytes without affecting cell proliferation and cytokine production. This work demonstrates the feasibility of the PROTAC approach in depleting the abundant cellular protein CypA at low drug dosage without affecting immune cells, allowing us to investigate the potential therapeutic effects associated with the endogenous protein in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2940 KB  
Review
Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Delivery into the Brain across the Blood-Brain Barrier
by Toshihiko Tashima
Antibodies 2023, 12(3), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/antib12030043 - 26 Jun 2023
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 12214
Abstract
Drug development for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease has challenging difficulties due to the pharmacokinetic impermeability based on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) as well as the blurriness of pharmacodynamic targets based on their unclarified pathogenesis and complicated [...] Read more.
Drug development for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease has challenging difficulties due to the pharmacokinetic impermeability based on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) as well as the blurriness of pharmacodynamic targets based on their unclarified pathogenesis and complicated progression mechanisms. Thus, in order to produce innovative central nervous system (CNS) agents for patients suffering from CNS diseases, effective, selective delivery of CNS agents into the brain across the BBB should be developed. Currently, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) attract rising attention as a new modality to degrade arbitrary intracellular proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The internalizations of peptide-based PROTACs by cell-penetrating peptides and that of small molecule-based PROTACs through passive diffusion lack cell selectivity. Therefore, these approaches may bring off-target side effects due to wrong distribution. Furthermore, efflux transporters such as multiple drug resistance 1 (MDR1) expressed at the BBB might interrupt the entry of small molecule-based PROTACs into the brain. Nonetheless, intelligent delivery using machinery systems to absorb the nutrition into the brain for homeostasis, such as carrier-mediated transport (CMT) or receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT), can be established. PROTACs with N-containing groups that are recognized by the proton-coupled organic cation antiporter might cross the BBB through CMT. PROTAC-antibody conjugates (PACs) might cross the BBB through RMT. Subsequently, such small molecule-based PROTACs released in the brain interstitial fluid would be transported into cells such as neurons through passive diffusion and then demonstrate arbitrary protein degradation. In this review, I introduce the potential and advantages of PROTAC delivery into the brain across the BBB through CMT or RMT using PACs in a non-invasive way. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibodies: 10th Anniversary)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7007 KB  
Review
Emerging Strategies in Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs): Highlights from 2022
by Rekha Tamatam and Dongyun Shin
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(6), 5190; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065190 - 8 Mar 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 7386
Abstract
Targeted protein degradation (TPD) is a promising therapeutic modality that has garnered attention in academic, industrial, and pharmaceutical research for treating diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, inflammation, and viral infections. In this context, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) present a reliable technology for degrading [...] Read more.
Targeted protein degradation (TPD) is a promising therapeutic modality that has garnered attention in academic, industrial, and pharmaceutical research for treating diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, inflammation, and viral infections. In this context, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) present a reliable technology for degrading disease-causing proteins. PROTACs complement small-molecule inhibitors, which primarily rely on direct protein regulation. From concept-to-clinic, PROTACs have evolved from cell impermeable peptide molecules to orally bioavailable drugs. Despite their potential in medicinal chemistry, certain aspects regarding PROTACs remain unclear. The clinical significance of PROTACs is primarily limited owing to their lack of selectivity and drug-like properties. This review focused on recently reported PROTAC strategies, particularly in 2022. It aimed to address and overcome the challenges posed by classical PROTACs by correlating them with emerging approaches with improved selectivity and controllability, cell permeability, linker flexibility, druggability, and PROTAC-based approaches, developed in 2022. Furthermore, recently reported PROTAC-based approaches are discussed, highlighting each of their advantages and limitations. We predict that several improved PROTAC molecules will be accessible for treating patients exhibiting various conditions, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, inflammation, and viral infections. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 913 KB  
Review
Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation with Payloads beyond Cytotoxins
by Qun Zhou
Molecules 2023, 28(3), 917; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28030917 - 17 Jan 2023
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 15408
Abstract
As antibody–drug conjugates have become a very important modality for cancer therapy, many site-specific conjugation approaches have been developed for generating homogenous molecules. The selective antibody coupling is achieved through antibody engineering by introducing specific amino acid or unnatural amino acid residues, peptides, [...] Read more.
As antibody–drug conjugates have become a very important modality for cancer therapy, many site-specific conjugation approaches have been developed for generating homogenous molecules. The selective antibody coupling is achieved through antibody engineering by introducing specific amino acid or unnatural amino acid residues, peptides, and glycans. In addition to the use of synthetic cytotoxins, these novel methods have been applied for the conjugation of other payloads, including non-cytotoxic compounds, proteins/peptides, glycans, lipids, and nucleic acids. The non-cytotoxic compounds include polyethylene glycol, antibiotics, protein degraders (PROTAC and LYTAC), immunomodulating agents, enzyme inhibitors and protein ligands. Different small proteins or peptides have been selectively conjugated through unnatural amino acid using click chemistry, engineered C-terminal formylglycine for oxime or click chemistry, or specific ligation or transpeptidation with or without enzymes. Although the antibody protamine peptide fusions have been extensively used for siRNA coupling during early studies, direct conjugations through engineered cysteine or lysine residues have been demonstrated later. These site-specific antibody conjugates containing these payloads other than cytotoxic compounds can be used in proof-of-concept studies and in developing new therapeutics for unmet medical needs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

43 pages, 9258 KB  
Review
Estrogen Receptor-α Targeting: PROTACs, SNIPERs, Peptide-PROTACs, Antibody Conjugated PROTACs and SNIPERs
by Arvind Negi, Kavindra Kumar Kesari and Anne Sophie Voisin-Chiret
Pharmaceutics 2022, 14(11), 2523; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112523 - 19 Nov 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6574
Abstract
Targeting selective estrogen subtype receptors through typical medicinal chemistry approaches is based on occupancy-driven pharmacology. In occupancy-driven pharmacology, molecules are developed in order to inhibit the protein of interest (POI), and their popularity is based on their virtue of faster kinetics. However, such [...] Read more.
Targeting selective estrogen subtype receptors through typical medicinal chemistry approaches is based on occupancy-driven pharmacology. In occupancy-driven pharmacology, molecules are developed in order to inhibit the protein of interest (POI), and their popularity is based on their virtue of faster kinetics. However, such approaches have intrinsic flaws, such as pico-to-nanomolar range binding affinity and continuous dosage after a time interval for sustained inhibition of POI. These shortcomings were addressed by event-driven pharmacology-based approaches, which degrade the POI rather than inhibit it. One such example is PROTACs (Proteolysis targeting chimeras), which has become one of the highly successful strategies of event-driven pharmacology (pharmacology that does the degradation of POI and diminishes its functions). The selective targeting of estrogen receptor subtypes is always challenging for chemical biologists and medicinal chemists. Specifically, estrogen receptor α (ER-α) is expressed in nearly 70% of breast cancer and commonly overexpressed in ovarian, prostate, colon, and endometrial cancer. Therefore, conventional hormonal therapies are most prescribed to patients with ER + cancers. However, on prolonged use, resistance commonly developed against these therapies, which led to selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) becoming the first-line drug for metastatic ER + breast cancer. The SERD success shows that removing cellular ER-α is a promising approach to overcoming endocrine resistance. Depending on the mechanism of degradation of ER-α, various types of strategies of developed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 5446 KB  
Review
Recent Advances in Natural Product-Based Hybrids as Anti-Cancer Agents
by Eleni Sflakidou, George Leonidis, Eirini Foroglou, Christos Siokatas and Vasiliki Sarli
Molecules 2022, 27(19), 6632; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196632 - 6 Oct 2022
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 7025
Abstract
Cancer is one of the top leading causes of death worldwide. It is a heterogenous disease characterized by unregulated cell proliferation and invasiveness of abnormal cells. For the treatment of cancer, natural products have been widely used as a source of therapeutic ingredients [...] Read more.
Cancer is one of the top leading causes of death worldwide. It is a heterogenous disease characterized by unregulated cell proliferation and invasiveness of abnormal cells. For the treatment of cancer, natural products have been widely used as a source of therapeutic ingredients since ancient times. Although natural compounds and their derivatives have demonstrated strong antitumor activity in many types of cancer, their poor pharmacokinetic properties, low cell selectivity, limited bioavailability and restricted efficacy against drug-resistant cancer cells hinder their wide clinical application. Conjugation of natural products with other bioactive molecules has given rise to a new field in drug discovery resulting to the development of novel, bifunctional and more potent drugs for cancer therapy to overcome the current drawbacks. This review discusses multiple categories of such bifunctional conjugates and highlights recent trends and advances in the development of natural product hybrids. Among them, ADCs, PDCs, ApDCs, PROTACs and AUTOTACs represent emerging therapeutic agents against cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Anticancer Agents Based on Natural Products)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2843 KB  
Article
Peptide Stapling Improves the Sustainability of a Peptide-Based Chimeric Molecule That Induces Targeted Protein Degradation
by Hidetomo Yokoo, Nobumichi Ohoka, Mami Takyo, Takahito Ito, Keisuke Tsuchiya, Takashi Kurohara, Kiyoshi Fukuhara, Takao Inoue, Mikihiko Naito and Yosuke Demizu
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(16), 8772; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168772 - 16 Aug 2021
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4332
Abstract
Peptide-based target protein degradation inducers called PROTACs/SNIPERs have low cell penetrability and poor intracellular stability as drawbacks. These shortcomings can be overcome by easily modifying these peptides by conjugation with cell penetrating peptides and side-chain stapling. In this study, we succeeded in developing [...] Read more.
Peptide-based target protein degradation inducers called PROTACs/SNIPERs have low cell penetrability and poor intracellular stability as drawbacks. These shortcomings can be overcome by easily modifying these peptides by conjugation with cell penetrating peptides and side-chain stapling. In this study, we succeeded in developing the stapled peptide stPERML-R7, which is based on the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-binding peptide PERML and composed of natural amino acids. stPERML-R7, which includes a hepta-arginine motif and a hydrocarbon stapling moiety, showed increased α-helicity and similar binding affinity toward ERα when compared with those of the parent peptide PERML. Furthermore, we used stPERML-R7 to develop a peptide-based degrader LCL-stPERML-R7 targeting ERα by conjugating stPERML-R7 with a small molecule LCL161 (LCL) that recruits the E3 ligase IAPs to induce proteasomal degradation via ubiquitylation. The chimeric peptide LCL-stPERML-R7 induced sustained degradation of ERα and potently inhibited ERα-mediated transcription more effectively than the unstapled chimera LCL-PERML-R7. These results suggest that a stapled structure is effective in maintaining the intracellular activity of peptide-based degraders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medicinal Chemistry of Nuclear Receptors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5050 KB  
Review
Impact of Cross-Coupling Reactions in Drug Discovery and Development
by Melissa J. Buskes and Maria-Jesus Blanco
Molecules 2020, 25(15), 3493; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153493 - 31 Jul 2020
Cited by 235 | Viewed by 20094
Abstract
Cross-coupling reactions have played a critical role enabling the rapid expansion of structure–activity relationships (SAR) during the drug discovery phase to identify a clinical candidate and facilitate subsequent drug development processes. The reliability and flexibility of this methodology have attracted great interest in [...] Read more.
Cross-coupling reactions have played a critical role enabling the rapid expansion of structure–activity relationships (SAR) during the drug discovery phase to identify a clinical candidate and facilitate subsequent drug development processes. The reliability and flexibility of this methodology have attracted great interest in the pharmaceutical industry, becoming one of the most used approaches from Lead Generation to Lead Optimization. In this mini-review, we present an overview of cross-coupling reaction applications to medicinal chemistry efforts, in particular the Suzuki–Miyaura and Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling reactions as a remarkable resource for the generation of carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom bonds. To further appreciate the impact of this methodology, the authors discuss some recent examples of clinical candidates that utilize key cross-coupling reactions in their large-scale synthetic process. Looking into future opportunities, the authors highlight the versatility of the cross-coupling reactions towards new chemical modalities like DNA-encoded libraries (DELs), new generation of peptides and cyclopeptides, allosteric modulators, and proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cross-Coupling Reactions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop