Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Detection of Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity—Supporting Antibodies by NK-92-CD16A Cell Externalization of CD107a: Recognition of Antibody Afucosylation and Assay Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
EMab-300 Detects Mouse Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Expressing Cancer Cell Lines in Flow Cytometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polyclonal Antibodies Derived from Transchromosomic Bovines Vaccinated with the Recombinant F1-V Vaccine Increase Bacterial Opsonization In Vitro and Protect Mice from Pneumonic Plague
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibodies
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/antib12030043
antibodies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Delivery into the Brain across the Blood-Brain Barrier

by
Toshihiko Tashima
Tashima Laboratories of Arts and Sciences, 1239-5 Toriyama-cho, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 222-0035, Japan
Antibodies 2023, 12(3), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/antib12030043
Submission received: 22 April 2023 / Revised: 3 June 2023 / Accepted: 16 June 2023 / Published: 26 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibodies: 10th Anniversary)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Drug development for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease has challenging difficulties due to the pharmacokinetic impermeability based on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) as well as the blurriness of pharmacodynamic targets based on their unclarified pathogenesis and complicated progression mechanisms. Thus, in order to produce innovative central nervous system (CNS) agents for patients suffering from CNS diseases, effective, selective delivery of CNS agents into the brain across the BBB should be developed. Currently, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) attract rising attention as a new modality to degrade arbitrary intracellular proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The internalizations of peptide-based PROTACs by cell-penetrating peptides and that of small molecule-based PROTACs through passive diffusion lack cell selectivity. Therefore, these approaches may bring off-target side effects due to wrong distribution. Furthermore, efflux transporters such as multiple drug resistance 1 (MDR1) expressed at the BBB might interrupt the entry of small molecule-based PROTACs into the brain. Nonetheless, intelligent delivery using machinery systems to absorb the nutrition into the brain for homeostasis, such as carrier-mediated transport (CMT) or receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT), can be established. PROTACs with N-containing groups that are recognized by the proton-coupled organic cation antiporter might cross the BBB through CMT. PROTAC-antibody conjugates (PACs) might cross the BBB through RMT. Subsequently, such small molecule-based PROTACs released in the brain interstitial fluid would be transported into cells such as neurons through passive diffusion and then demonstrate arbitrary protein degradation. In this review, I introduce the potential and advantages of PROTAC delivery into the brain across the BBB through CMT or RMT using PACs in a non-invasive way.

1. Introduction

It is true that medical treatment has benefited humankind in terms of health and longevity but the development of new pharmaceutical agents has become more and more difficult due to lack of seeds such as druggable targets and potent compounds, huge cost, adverse side-effects, and technological problems such as poor stability, poor solubility, cell membrane impermeability, and wrong distribution. There remain many intractable diseases that distress patients extremely. Thus, novel therapeutic modalities are required to resolve this present situation. Among them, the proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) (Figure 1) [1,2] is of current interest, because PROTAC molecules degrade arbitrary intracellular proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. This chemical protein knockdown mechanism of the drug action is different from the mechanisms of inhibitors and antagonists, even though they are peptide-based or small molecule-based types. However, PROTACs have problems such as membrane permeability and cell selectivity. In drug discovery and development, cell membrane impermeability is a serious problem. Central nervous system (CNS) disease drugs must cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in order to be distributed into the brain. The BBB [3] is substantially composed of physical barriers such as (i) hydrophobic lipid bilayer membranes of the capillary endothelial cells, (ii) tight junctions between the capillary endothelial cells, (iii) periendothelial accessory backing structures formed by pericytes and astrocytes [4], and biological barriers such as (iv) excretion by efflux transporters including multiple drug resistance 1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein) that captures hydrophobic low molecular substances just passing through the apical membrane of the capillary endothelial cells [5] and excretes them to the blood stream. Nonetheless, the brain must take in nutrients delivered by the blood and excrete waste products to the bloodstream to maintain physiological homeostasis. Glucose, amino acids, and insulin are transported at the BBB by corresponding solute carrier (SLC) transporters that constitute the superfamily. Moreover, high-molecular compounds are transported through receptor-mediated transcytosis or macropinocytosis. Generally, substances are categorized in size into low-molecular compounds (molecular weight (MW) < approximately 500 Da), middle-molecular compounds (MW approximately 500–3000 Da), and high-molecular compounds (MW > approximately 3000 Da). If designed low-molecular hydrophobic or hydrophilic compounds are the substrates of arbitrary SLC transporters at the BBB, they will be transported into the brain across the membrane of the capillary endothelial cells without being excreted by MDR1s. On the other hand, designed high- or middle-molecular compounds such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) [6,7] or drug-encapsulated nanoparticles covered with antibodies would cross the BBB into the brain through the physical and biological systems such as receptor-mediated transcytosis or macropinocytosis based on the structuralism propounded by Dr. Claude Lévi-Strauss. So far, I have introduced the drug delivery systems across the membrane [6,7,8,9], using vectors such as antibodies [6,7,9], cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) [9], tumor-homing peptides (THPs) [9], and transporter recognition units [8,9] that enable cell internalization. Designed compounds will behave as regulated by the physical and biological machinery systems. Large compounds cannot penetrate through the narrow pores of transporters and ion channels. Hydrophilic compounds cannot cross the lipidic membrane through passive diffusion. Positively charged substances will electrostatically interact with negatively charged substances. The ligand-receptor bindings will induce some types of biological events such as endocytosis and signal transduction. Substances never go against the rules of nature even at the molecular level, although human might recognize their behavior through statistical analyses in some cases. Hidden variable theory might elucidate such statistical behavior. Thus, well-designed compounds can be delivered into the brain across the BBB by taking advantage of such structural systems. In this perspective review, I introduce the possibilities and implements of PROTAC delivery into the brain across the BBB in a non-invasive way. A particularly promising strategy is PROTAC-antibody conjugates (PACs) through receptor-mediated transcytosis (Figure 2).

2. Discussion

2.1. PROTACs

PROTAC is a novel therapeutic modality using the ubiquitin-proteasome system. PROTAC molecules degrade target proteins due to the endogenous decomposition system, different from the competitive inhibition or irreversible inhibition systems and slightly similar to the messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation system by short interfering RNAs (siRNA) called RNA interference. The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a crucial protein degradation system in all eukaryotes. Ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin conjugases (E2), ubiquitin ligases (E3), ubiquitin, and the 26S proteasome play essential roles in intracellular proteolysis (Figure 3) [10,11].
Canonical PROTACs are heterobifunctional molecules composed of a target protein ligand and an E3 ligase ligand via a suitable linker (Figure 1) [12]. They reversibly bind E3 ligases and target proteins also named proteins of interest (POIs). When they bind E3 ligases and target proteins simultaneously, polyubiquitination of target proteins occurs, which leads to the degradation by the 26S proteasomes. As an E3 ligase, VHL (von Hippel-Lindau), CRBN (cereblon), and cIAP (cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein) are often targeted, although there are approximately 600 types of E3 ligases [13]. In many cases, linkers are polyethylene glycols (PEGs) and linear alkyl chains [14].
The permeability of small molecule-based PROTACs was evaluated in in vitro assay using cells. VHL-based PROTACs (n = 115) were classified into a high-permeability class (n = 46), a moderate-permeability class (n = 44), and a low-permeability class (n = 25). CRBN-based PROTACs (n = 113) were classified into a high-permeability class (n = 59), a moderate-permeability class (n = 45), and a low-permeability class (n = 9). Surprisingly, it turned out that small molecule-based PROTACs showed high and moderate membrane permeability. However, it was uncertain whether the transport mechanisms were based on passive diffusion or carrier-mediated transportation [15]. The stable solution conformations of PROTACs were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy through nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) or molecular dynamics simulations. While the gauche effect of PEG-type linkers evoked a larger proportion of folded conformations, alkyl linkers evoked a larger proportion of elongated anti-conformations. It was likely that a PROTAC with PEG-type linkers that evoked folded conformation would be transported through passive diffusion to a greater extent than a PROTAC with alkyl linkers that evoked elongated anti-conformation in in vitro permeation assay calculating passive permeability using Caco-2 cell monolayers. Nevertheless, PROTACs with PEG-type linkers and PROTACs with alkyl linkers demonstrated permeation through the artificial membrane, to the same degree, in a parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) [16]. The prediction of the permeability will be improved by machine learning methods through physical property factors such as molecular weight, hetero atoms, H-bond donors, H-bond acceptors, the number of rotatable bonds (NRotB), logD, and the polar surface area (PSA).
PROTACs, particularly peptide-based PROTACs, show poor permeability. To enhance their permeability, CPPs are introduced into PROTACs. CPPs are oligopeptides that are 5–30 residues in length and positively charged, and can enter cells across the membrane. Although the internalization mechanisms of CPPs remain unknown, receptor-mediated endocytosis and direct translocation are widely accepted. Trans-activator of transcription (TAT) protein (YGRKKRRQRRR), R9 (RRRRRRRRR), and penetratin (RQIKIWFQNRRMKWKK) are representative CPPs [9]. CPP-cargo conjugates can be used for drug delivery into cells across the membrane. Actually, PROTACs with CPP can enter cells and elicit degradation activities there. Several PROTACs with CPPs as a vector are shown here to understand membrane-permeable PROTAC molecule designs. Illustrations (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6) are easier to understand than text.
(i)
X-protein, derived from the hepatitis B virus (HBV), induces hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Thus, the elimination of X-protein by a PROTAC approach can prevent HCC. X-proteins were oligomerized through the oligomerization domain that could be an X-protein ligand. Anti-X-protein peptide-based PROTACs with (a) the oligomerization domain of the X-protein as an X-protein ligand, (b) degron peptide of the X-protein as an E3 ligase ligand, and (c) R8 as a CPP (Figure 4) entered cells and destroyed the X-protein in HepG2 cells. In general, a degron is a peptide sequence within a protein and is recognized by an E3 ligase. The instability domain as a degron peptide would induce proteasomal degradation of the X-protein [17].
(ii)
The first in vivo examples of small molecule-based PROTACs were demonstrated targeting the FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) or androgen receptor (AR). AP21998/hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 1α-based PROTAC (Figure 5) is composed of (a) AP21998 as an FKBP12 ligand, (b) the ALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligand, and (c) D-R8 fused to the C-terminus. FKBP12 was fused to enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) by a vector, to monitor loss of intracellular fluorescence by degradation due to PROTACs. After hydroxylation of the central proline in the ALAPYIP sequence of HIF 1α by a proline hydroxylase, the hydroxylated ALAPYIP became recognized by VHL. On the other hand, dihydrotestosterone (DHT)/HIF 1α-based PROTAC (Figure 5) is composed of (a) DHT as an androgen receptor (AR) ligand, (b) the ALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligand after hydroxylation of the central proline in the ALAPYIP sequence by a proline hydroxylase, and (c) D-R8 fused to the C-terminus. The AR was fused to GFP. In fact, the AP21998/ HIF 1α-based PROTAC degraded EGFP-FKBP12 in a VHL-dependent manner using HeLaEGFP-FKBP cells. The fluorescence of FKBP12-EGFP was lost in the cells. The DHT/HIF1 α-based PROTAC induced the degradation of the AR using HEK293GFP-AR cells [18]. These findings suggested that PROTACs were transported into cells across the membrane by virtue of CPPs. D-R8 is more stable to L-protein-mediated enzymatic degradation than L-R8.
(iii)
PROTACs for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were developed. The tau protein abnormally aggregates in AD patients’ brains. Peptide-based PROTACs with (a) a tau ligand, (b) an E3 ligase ligand, and (c) D-R8 fused to the C-terminus of the E3 ligase ligand were designed. Among them, TH006, with (b) the ALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligand (Figure 6), demonstrated the highest tau degradation in in vitro assay using tau-overexpressed SH-SY5Y cells, and furthermore, it reduced the toxicity of amyloid β (Aβ), and lowered the tau level in an AD mouse model [19].
(iv)
Moreover, peptide-based PROTACs with (a) a tau ligand, (b) Kelch-like ECH-associated protein-1 (Keap1) ligand as an E3 ligase ligand forming the Keap1- Cullin (Cul3) E3 ligase complex, and (c) D-R8 at the C-terminus (Figure 6) showed degradation of intracellular tau in vitro using tau-EGFP over-expressed SH-SY5Y cells [20].
(v)
PROTACs for Parkinson’s disease (PD) were developed. α-Synuclein protein aggregation is a prominent feature in PD patients’ brains. Peptide-based PROTACs with (a) an α-synuclein ligand, (b) an E3 ligase ligand at the carboxyl terminus, and (c) TAT at the N-terminus (Figure 6) suppressed the cellular α-synuclein level in the primary cultured cortical neurons [21]. Although CPPs delivered PROTACs into cells, they lacked cell selectivity. Positively charged TAT was internalized through receptor-mediated endocytosis using ubiquitously expressed negatively charged heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) as a receptor on the cell surface. Furthermore, passive diffusion also lacks cell selectivity. VHL and CRBN are ubiquitously expressed in various tissues [22]. To avoid wrong distribution and off-target side effects, cell-selective internalization should be established using well-designed compounds.

2.2. Clinical Trials of PROTACs

The first PROTAC, that is, Protac-1 (Figure 7), was reported in 2001. Protac-1 possesses ovalicin to bind methionine aminopeptidase-2 (MetAP-2) as a target protein ligand and the IκBα phosphopeptide to bind β-TRCP contained in the heterotetrameric Skp1-Cullin-F box E3 ligase complex as an E3 ligase ligand via an alkyl linker [23]. The first small molecule-based PROTAC with a non-steroidal AR ligand as a target protein ligand and nutlin as an E3 ligase ligand via a PEG-based linker (Figure 7), reported in 2008, effectively degraded AR after cell membrane permeation in cancer cells [24]. ARV-110 (Figure 8), with a non-steroidal AR ligand and a CRBN ligand, was the first PROTAC molecule that entered clinical testing in 2019, for the treatment of prostate cancer. A number of PROTACs have been developed. Clinical trials using PROTACs have been performed only for the treatment of cancers but, however, have not been performed for CNS diseases yet [25,26]. In general, the difficulty of CNS drug development is due to the impermeability of the BBB and wrong distribution. Thus, some improvements are required for PROTAC design. The PAC strategy can hopefully be one of the solutions.
Clinical trials using PROTACs for cancers (Table 1 and Figure 8) have been overlooked in order to horizontally deploy knowledge toward PROTACs for CNS diseases. Most of them are small or middle molecule-based PROTACs, probably due to manufacturability, stability, and membrane permeability through passive diffusion, although some of their structures are unfamiliar. The following are in phase 1 clinical trial: (i) AC682 with a CRBN ligand and an estrogen receptor (ER) ligand for breast cancer (NCT05080842), (ii) CC-94676 with a CRBN ligand and a non-steroidal AR ligand for prostatic neoplasms (NCT04428788), (iii) DT2216 with a VHL ligand and a B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-XL) ligand for solid tumor and hematologic malignancy (NCT04886622), (iv) FHD-609 with a CRBN ligand and a bromodomain-containing protein 9 (BRD9) ligand for advanced synovial sarcoma (NCT04965753), (v) KT-474 with a CRBN ligand and an interleukin 1 receptor associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) ligand for healthy volunteer atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa (NCT04772885), (vi) KT-413 with a CRBN ligand and an IRAK4 ligand for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, DLBCL, and MYD88 gene mutation (NCT05233033), (vii) NX-2127 with a CRBN ligand and a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) ligand for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocyticlymphoma (SLL), Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), follicular lymphoma (FL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) (NCT04830137), and (viii) NX-5948 with a CRBN ligand and a BTK ligand for CLL, SLL, DLBCL, FL, MCL, MZL, WM, and PCNSL (NCT05131022).
Furthermore, (ix) ARV-110 with a CRBN ligand and a non-steroidal AR ligand for prostate cancer metastatic (NCT03888612), (x) ARV-471 with a CRBN ligand and an ER ligand for breast cancer (NCT04072952), and (xi) ARV-766 with a VHL ligand and a BRD4 ligand for prostate cancer metastatic (NCT05067140), are in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials.

2.3. The Possibilities of PROTACs for CNS Diseases

CNS diseases remain unmet medical needs for patients suffering from neurodegenerative diseases such as AD, PD, and Huntington’s disease (HD) [27]. Innovative CNS pharmaceutical agents should be developed. PROTACs are promising candidates because of selective protein degradation, including Aβ and tau characteristics in the pathology of AD, α-synuclein characteristics in the pathology of PD, and huntingtin characteristics in the pathology of HD. Tau species cause tauopathies including AD, Pick’s disease (PiD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) [7]. Intravenously administered PROTAC molecules for CNS diseases must cross three plasma membranes, that is, the apical membrane and the basolateral membrane of the capillary endothelial cells at the BBB and the plasma membrane of target brain cells such as neurons, because the ubiquitin-proteasome system acts inside target brain cells. In general, canonical PROTAC molecules demonstrate low cell selectivity and low membrane permeability. Passive diffusion across the membrane lacks cell selectivity. HSPGs express ubiquitously on the surface of many types of cells. Thus, to avoid off-target side effects, high selective internalization into target cells, particularly, such as the capillary endothelial cells at the BBB should be carried out. (i) Receptor-mediated transcytosis using a transferrin receptor and an insulin receptor [6,7,9] and (ii) carrier-mediated transport using the proton-coupled organic cation antiporter [8] are non-invasively practicable as transendothelium strategies at the BBB. (i) A transferrin receptor is often used for receptor-mediated transcytosis. When a ligand in the bloodstream binds a transferrin receptor on the apical membrane of the capillary endothelial cells, ligand-receptor complexes are endocytosed. A ligand is liberated from the receptor in an endosome as acidification due to endosomal maturation and is subsequently exocytosed to the brain parenchyma through the brain interstitial fluid (ISF) based on the fusion between the endosome and the basolateral membrane via the secretory pathway instead of the degradation pathway leading to lysosomal degradation. Anti-transferrin receptor monoclonal antibodies are used as a ligand. Well-designed antibodies including antibody-PROTAC conjugates or PROTAC-encapsuled nanoparticles covered with antibodies can intentionally cross the BBB through receptor-mediated transcytosis. An IgG molecule often used for ADCs is approximately 14.2 nm in diameter and approximately 150 kDa. (ii) On the other hand, it is well-known that clinically used CNS drugs structurally possess N-containing groups. This fact suggests that arbitrary amine transporters at the BBB transport low molecular compounds with N-containing groups into the brain across the endothelium. The proton-coupled organic cation antiporter is considered as such an amine transporter, although its amino acid sequence and its topology are not identified yet [8]. Well-designed compounds with N-containing groups can intentionally cross the apical membrane into the capillary endothelial cells through carrier-mediated endocytosis. Therefore, well-designed PROTACs can cross the BBB through receptor-mediated transcytosis or through carrier-mediated endocytosis due to biologically and physically systemic structures based on the structuralism propounded by Dr. Lévi-Strauss.

2.4. The Implements of PROTACs for CNS Diseases

The ubiquitin-proteasome system can be used to treat AD [28]. In fact, tau was degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system during AD pathogenesis [29]. Interestingly, PROTACs for AD were evaluated. Whereas Aβ species were found in extracellular regions, tau species were found both in intracellular and extracellular regions [7]. PROTACs are suitable for tau clearance. Anti-tau peptide-based PROTACs with CPP (Figure 6) [19,20], including TH006, are described above. Anti-tau small molecule-based PROTACs are also being developed and are apt to be superior to peptide-based PROTACs with respect to manufacturability and stability.
QC-01-175 with a tau ligand (18F-T807 derivative) and a CRBN ligand (Figure 9) degraded aberrant tau in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) patient-derived neuronal cell models in in vitro assay [30]. QC-01-175 was transported into the neuronal cell across the membrane, probably through passive diffusion due to the CLogP value of 2.221 or through carrier-mediated transportation. Lipinski’s rule of 5 proselytized by Dr. Christopher A. Lipinski suggested that oral drugs with good bioavailability should have a LogP value less than 5 and less than 500 MW [31]. Many PROTACs under clinical trials were perorally administered (Table 1), although their CLogP values were not calculated by the software and their MWs were beyond 500. Furthermore, it was revealed that small molecule-based PROTACs showed high and moderate membrane permeability in in vitro assay using cells [15,16]. Accordingly, it is likely that small molecule-based PROTACs will demonstrate decent membrane permeation through passive diffusion and/or through carrier-mediated transportation. It should be established whether small molecule-based PROTACs are substrates of MDR1 or not. Intriguingly, it was suggested that PROTAC-resistance in cancer cells resulted from MDR1 overexpression [32]. Therefore, approaches to avoid excretion by MDR1 are useful in PROTAC development. At the BBB, receptor-mediated transcytosis using a transferrin receptor and carrier-mediated endocytosis using the proton-coupled organic cation antiporter are solutions.
C004019 with a tau ligand (ID220149 [33]) and a VHL ligand (Figure 9) degraded tau proteins in the brain through subcutaneous administration in in vivo assay using wild-type, hTau-transgenic and 3xTg-AD mice with improvement of the synaptic and cognitive functions [34]. This finding implied that C004019 probably crossed the BBB through passive diffusion or through carrier-mediated transportation.
Excessive tau phosphorylation enhances the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) containing tau and the neurotoxicity of Aβ. Anti-tau small molecule-based PROTACs with a tau ligand (THK5105 derivative) and a CRBN ligand, that is, compound I3, showed tau degradation and reduced Aβ-induced cytotoxicity in in vitro assay using the PC12 cells [35].
Furthermore, PROTACs for PD were also evaluated. A peptide-based PROTAC with an α-synuclein ligand, an E3 ligase ligand, and TAT demonstrated cellular α-synuclein reduction in the primary cultured cortical neuron, as mentioned above (Figure 6) [21]. Anti-α-synuclein small molecule-based PROTACs with a VHL ligand are also being developed (Figure 10) [36,37].
HD is a neurodegenerative disease caused by heterogeneous aggregation of mutated huntingtin proteins with normal huntingtin proteins [38]. The pathogenesis of HD has still not been resolved [39]. Nonetheless, PROTACs for HD are being developed. Anti-huntingtin PROTAC with a huntingtin ligand and a cIAP ligand (Figure 11) reduced mutant huntingtin levels in fibroblasts derived from two patients with HD [40].
PROTACs can lower the intracellular tau and α-synuclein levels by degradation based on the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nonetheless, how to deliver PROTACs selectively and effectively into the brain is an important problem. Carrier-mediated transport and receptor-mediated transcytosis are solutions.

2.5. Promising PROTACs for CNS Diseases

PROTACs for CNS diseases must enter the brain across the BBB. It was revealed that small molecule-based PROTACs showed high and moderate membrane permeability through passive diffusion [15,16]. Thus, they are distributed not only across the BBB to the brain but also to other tissues across certain membranes leading to off-target side effects. Some of them might be substrates of MDR1 at the BBB. Therefore, selective, effective transendothelium at the BBB should be conducted. It is known that transporters such as the proton-coupled organic cation antiporter [8] and receptors such as transferrin receptors and insulin receptors are expressed on the surface of the apical membrane of the capillary endothelial cells at the BBB. Two strategies for PROTACs to cross the BBB can be planned. One is carrier-mediated transport across the apical membrane using the proton-coupled organic cation antiporter and subsequent passive diffusion and/or carrier-mediated transport across the basolateral membrane, that is, the BBB. The other is receptor-mediated transcytosis across the BBB using a transferrin receptor. The BBB disruption caused by CNS diseases occurs and permits substances to enter spontaneously the brain through there [41]. However, this situation is transient and impermanent and depends on the conditions. Universal behaviors are necessary with respect to reproducibility.
Many existing small molecule-based PROTACs have N-containing groups. Thus, some of them might cross the BBB as substrates of the proton-coupled organic cation antiporter. If they are not the substrates, the introduction of N-containing groups such as the 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl group to PROTAC molecules might enable them to be the substrates. Prodrug approaches would be effective when the interaction of PROTACs to the corresponding intracellular receptors is interrupted due to steric hindrance based on N-containing groups. The permeability and degradation activity of designed PROTACs with N-containing groups can be tuned by repeated evaluation in in vitro tests reflecting the assay results.
Substance deliveries into the brain across the BBB were carried out through receptor-mediated transcytosis using a transferrin receptor. J-Brain Cargo® is a drug delivery system into the brain across the BBB using anti-transferrin receptor ADCs with drugs [42]. Idursulfase beta [43], an anti-transferrin receptor antibody fused to iduronate-2-sulfatase based on J-Brain Cargo®, was clinically approved in Japan on 23 March 2021 for the treatment of Hunter syndrome. Anti-transferrin receptor ADCs can deliver drugs into the brain across the BBB through receptor-mediated transcytosis by the same strategy of J-Brain Cargo®. After the endocytosis triggered by ligand-receptor binding on the cell surface, antibodies are liberated from ADC-transferrin receptor complexes in endosomes as acidification. pH in endosomes gradually reduces from the early endosome (pH approximately 6.5) to late endosome (pH approximately 5.5) and then lysosome (pH approximately 4.5) by vacuolar H+-ATPase proton pumps [9]. pH-sensitive linkers connecting an antibody and drugs are cleaved in such acidification. Eventually, liberated antibodies and drugs are released to the brain based on the fusion between endosomes and the membrane in the secretory pathway. When the affinity between the antibody and a transferrin receptor is high, unliberated ADC-transferrin receptor complexes are degraded in lysosomes by lysosomal enzymes in the degradation pathway. The affinity between the antibody and a transferrin receptor should be moderate.
PROTAC-antibody conjugate (PAC) is a type of ADC, replacing ADC drugs with PROTACs. PACs, also called degrader-antibody conjugates (DACs), have attracted attention [44,45].
(i)
A trastuzumab-PROTAC conjugate with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligand (Figure 12) showed BRD4 degradation only in HER2 positive breast cancer cell lines [46]. Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a humanized, recombinant monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of human epidermal growth factor type 2 (HER2). This trastuzumab-PROTAC was internalized into cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis using HER2. It was thought that S-S bonds that connected linkers and a trastuzumab were reductively cleaved in endosomes [47] and that ester bonds that connected a linker and a PROTAC were enzymatically cleaved in endosomes and/or lysosomes. Cleaved PROTACs were implied to have been transported into the cytosol across the membrane of endosomes and/or lysosomes through passive diffusion, because PROTACs showed BRD4 degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
(ii)
Several antibody-PROTAC conjugates with an ER ligand and an E3 ligase ligand were designed and evaluated for their ER degradation activity. Among them, an anti-HER2 antibody-PROTAC conjugate with an ER ligand and a VHL ligand (Figure 13) demonstrated the highest ERα degradation (99%) using MCF7-neo/HER2 cells that were stably transfected to overexpress HER2 [48]. Thus, this PAC entered cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis using HER2. It was thought that cleaved PROTACs were transported into the cytosol across the membrane of endosomes and/or lysosomes through passive diffusion.
(iii)
Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate 1 (STEAP1) is a membrane protein overexpressed in cancer cells. Anti-STEAP1 antibody-PROTAC conjugates with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligand, particularly STEAP1-5a (drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) 6.0) (Figure 14), afforded degradation of the BRD4 protein with a DC50 value of 0.67 nM using PC3-S1 prostate cancer cells [49]. The DC50 value is the concentration at which the target is degraded by fifty percent. Modified anti-STEAP1 antibody-PROTAC conjugates with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligand, particularly STEAP1-9d (DAR 5.9) (Figure 12), afforded the highest degradation of the BRD4 protein with a DC50 value of 0.025 nM using PC3-S1 prostate cancer cells [50]. Anti-STEAP1 antibody-PROTAC conjugates entered cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis using STEAP1. Enzymatically cleaved PROTACs were transferred to the cytosol from lysosomes probably through passive diffusion. Whereas STEAP1-5a was cut by proteases, STEAP1-9d was cut by phosphatases. Currently, PACs have been investigated mainly for cancer therapy. However, this strategy can be applied to other diseases including CNS diseases.
Intravenously administered anti-transferrin receptor PACs would be delivered into the brain across the BBB, similarly to the anti-transferrin receptor ADC (Figure 1). If PACs are tethered with a pH-sensitive linker, liberated PROTACs in endosomes would be released into the brain and be transported into cells. Thus, anti-transferrin receptor PAC strategy is a promising method to deliver PROTACs into the brain across the BBB.
Moreover, PACs have a long half-life based on neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-mediated salvation from the lysosomal degradation. FcRn is expressed at the apical membrane of the endothelial cells. Under physiological pH (7.0–7.4), antibodies and FcRn do not bind in the systemic circulation. Endocytosed by-stander antibodies bind FcRn under weak acidic conditions in endosomes as acidification. Antibody-FcRn complexes in endosome were exposed to the systemic circulation through exocytosis in the secretory pathway. Antibody-FcRn complexes were liberated under physiological pH [6,7]. The half-lives of the antibodies were 29.7 days for IgG1, 26.9 days for IgG2, and 15.7 days for IgG3 [51]. Therefore, PACs are expected to have long half-life, resulting in low dose administration.
Nanoparticles as carriers used for drug delivery systems are biodegradable, biocompatible, stable, and easy to modify. NanoPROTACs are PROTACs using nanoparticles and make it possible to improve the delivery and mechanism of action of PROTACs [52]. PROTAC-encapsulated nanoparticles covered with antibodies were developed. PROTAC with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligand, that is, MZ1, was encapsulated in nanoparticles covered with trastuzumab targeting HER2. This NanoPROTAC (100 nm in diameter) showed a significant cytotoxic effect in in vitro assay using HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines [53]. Most endocytosis is (a) clathrin-dependent endocytosis (endosomal diameter of 85–150 nm), although there are several other mechanisms of endocytosis such as (b) caveolae-dependent endocytosis (endosomal diameter of 50–100 nm), (c) clathrin- and caveolae-independent endocytosis (endosomal diameter of approximately 90 nm), (d) macropinocytosis (endosomal diameter of 0.2–5 µm), and (e) other mechanically incomprehensible endocytoses [9]. The endocytosed substances must be of a size that can be contained in endosomes. After receptor-mediated endocytosis using HER2, MZ1 molecules were released through nanoparticles composed of poly-lactic acid (PLA) and showed the degradation via endosomal/lysosomal escape. Thus, similarly, PROTAC-encapsulated nanoparticles covered with anti-transferrin receptor antibodies might cross the BBB through receptor-mediated transcytosis. PROTACs with a tau ligand and an E3 ligase ligand might be released from the nanoparticles in endosomes and/or in the brain ISF and then penetrate neurons through passive diffusion. This NanoPROTAC strategy would be a promising method to deliver PROTACs into the brain across the BBB.

3. Conclusions

Neurodegenerative diseases such as AD, PD, and HD still remain intractable, because methods of effective treatment have not been established due to unclarified pathogenesis and complicated progression mechanisms. Moreover, most drugs do not reach the brain due to the impermeability based on the BBB. Innovative CNS agents to cross the BBB and elicit their activity there should be developed. At present, PROTAC is attention-getting as a novel modality. PROTAC molecules are constituted of heterobifunctional units of a target protein ligand and a E3 ligase ligand via a linker and induce the proteasomal degradation of the target proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (Figure 1). They are structurally divided into peptide-based type and small molecule-based types. Peptide-based PROTACs probably show poor permeability and thus use CPPs such as R8 to cross the membrane. On the other hand, small molecule-based PROTACs show high and moderate permeability through passive diffusion [15,16]. The internalizations based on CPPs and passive diffusion are subject to off-target side effects due to wrong distribution. It is suggested that small molecule-based PROTACs are substrates of MDR1 that interrupt the entry into the brain. Therefore, selective distribution and effective internalization should be accomplished simultaneously by taking advantage of the biological and physical machinery systems based on structuralism. This is assimilation rather than hijack. The brain takes in nutrition from the systemic circulation across the BBB through carrier-mediated transport, receptor-mediated transcytosis, and macropinocytosis. For example: (i) it is known that drugs with N-containing groups are delivered into the brain across the BBB. Amine derivatives are positively charged in the systemic circulation under physiological conditions and cannot penetrate the membrane through passive diffusion. Amine transporters absorb drugs with N-containing groups. The proton-coupled organic cation antiporter is suggested to mediate the absorption of drugs with N-containing groups, although its amino acid sequence has not been identified yet. Transporter-consciously designed compounds with N-containing groups can be transported in the capillary endothelial at the BBB. (ii) Some receptors such as transferrin receptors and insulin receptors at the apical membrane in the capillary endothelial cells deliver substances into the brain through receptor-mediated transcytosis. In the case of transferrin receptors, holo-transferrin (apo-transferrin-Fe (III) complex) binding to transferrin receptors mediates endocytosis. Holo-transferrin is liberated from the complex receptor as endosomal acidification and subsequently is released to the brain ISF through exocytosis based on the fusion between endosomes and the basolateral membrane. Artificial ligands of transferrin receptors, such as antibodies, induce receptor-mediated transcytosis. (iii) Endosomes triggered by clathrin-dependent endocytosis are 85–150 nm in diameter, which is enough to contain nanoparticles. Drugs encapsulated in nanoparticles are protected from enzymatic metabolism, like RNAs in exosomes. Anti-receptor antibody-loaded nanoparticles are ligands to the corresponding receptors that mediate transcytosis at the BBB. The clustering of ligand-receptor complexes derived from transferrin receptors enhances endocytosis [54,55]. Anti-receptor antibody-loaded nanoparticles as a multiligand might enhance receptor-mediated transcytosis at the BBB.
Therefore, as a summary, the delivery methods of PROTACs into the brain across the BBB are presented as three approaches: (i) PROTACs with N-containing groups that are recognized by the proton-coupled organic cation antiporter [8], (ii) PROTAC-antibody conjugate (PAC) targeting transferrin receptors (Figure 2), and (iii) PROTAC-encapsulated nanoparticles covered with antibodies targeting transferrin receptors as a NanoPROTAC strategy.
Inspired readers are expected to suggest better ideas (Table 2). Substances materialistically and autonomously act in biological and physical machinery systems that regulate ATP-driven organic activities in tissues, cells, and organelles, based on the structuralism propounded by Dr. Lévi-Strauss [56,57]. Humans cannot intentionally control the pharmacokinetic behavior of such substances within a living organism, unless they use psychokinesis. However, comprehensive drug design incorporating the structuralism based on existentialism proselytized by Dr. Jean-Paul Sartre can overcome the restrictions of the present systemic structures to elicit their activity pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically. As a result, medicinal chemists and pharmaceutical scientists will produce innovative drugs that treat intractable diseases.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This review is just my opinion based on or inferred from available published articles and public knowledge. Thus, the intellectual property rights are not infringed upon.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zou, Y.; Ma, D.; Wang, Y. The PROTAC technology in drug development. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2019, 37, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. He, M.; Cao, C.; Ni, Z.; Liu, Y.; Song, P.; Hao, S.; He, Y.; Sun, X.; Rao, Y. PROTACs: Great opportunities for academia and industry (an update from 2020 to 2021). Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2022, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Segarra, M.; Aburto, M.A.; Acker-Palmer, A. Blood-Brain Barrier Dynamics to Maintain Brain Homeostasis. Trends Neurosci. 2021, 44, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Armulik, A.; Genové, G.; Mäe, M.; Nisancioglu, M.H.; Wallgard, E.; Niaudet, C.; He, L.; Norlin, J.; Lindblom, P.; Strittmatter, K.; et al. Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature 2010, 468, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kimura, Y.; Morita, S.; Matsuo, M.; Ueda, K. Mechanism of multidrug recognition by MDR1/ABCB1. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98, 1303–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tashima, T. Brain Cancer Chemotherapy through a Delivery System across the Blood-Brain Barrier into the Brain Based on Receptor-Mediated Transcytosis Using Monoclonal Antibody Conjugates. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tashima, T. Delivery of Intravenously Administered Antibodies Targeting Alzheimer’s Disease-Relevant Tau Species into the Brain Based on Receptor-Mediated Transcytosis. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tashima, T. Intriguing possibilities and beneficial aspects of transporter-conscious drug design. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 4119–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tashima, T. Smart Strategies for Therapeutic Agent Delivery into Brain across the Blood–Brain Barrier Using Receptor-Mediated Transcytosis. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2020, 68, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kleiger, G.; Mayor, T. Perilous journey: A tour of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Trends Cell Biol. 2014, 24, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pohl, C.; Dikic, I. Cellular quality control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. Science 2019, 366, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Burslem, G.M.; Crews, C.M. Small-Molecule Modulation of Protein Homeostasis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11269–11301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ohoka, N. Development of Protein Knockdown Technology as Emerging Drug Discovery Strategy. Yakugaku Zasshi 2018, 138, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Troup, R.I.; Fallan, C.; Baud, M.G.J. Current strategies for the design of PROTAC linkers: A critical review. Explor. Target Antitumor Ther. 2020, 1, 273–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Poongavanam, V.; Atilaw, Y.; Siegel, S.; Giese, A.; Lehmann, L.; Meibom, D.; Erdelyi, M.; Kihlberg, J. Linker-dependent folding rationalizes PROTAC cell permeability. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 13029–13040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Poongavanam, V.; Kölling, F.; Giese, A.; Göller, A.H.; Lehmann, L.; Meibom, D.; Kihlberg, J. Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning. ACS Omega 2022, 8, 5901–5916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Montrose, K.; Krissansen, G.W. Design of a PROTAC that antagonizes and destroys the cancer-forming X-protein of the hepatitis B virus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 453, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schneekloth, J.S., Jr.; Fonseca, F.N.; Koldobskiy, M.; Mandal, A.; Deshaies, R.; Sakamoto, K.; Crews, C.M. Chemical genetic control of protein levels: Selective in vivo targeted degradation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 12, 3748–3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chu, T.-T.; Gao, N.; Li, Q.Q.; Chen, P.-G.; Yang, X.-F.; Chen, Y.-X.; Zhao, Y.-F.; Li, Y.-M. Specific knockdown of endogenous tau protein by peptide-directed ubiquitin-proteasome degradation. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lu, M.; Liu, T.; Jiao, Q.; Ji, J.; Tao, M.; Liu, Y.; You, Q.; Jiang, Z. Discovery of a Keap1-dependent peptide PROTAC to knockdown tau by ubiquitination-proteasome degradation pathway. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 146, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qu, J.; Ren, X.; Xue, F.; He, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, J. Specific Knockdown of α-Synuclein by Peptide Directed Proteasome Degradation Rescued Its Associated Neurotoxicity. Cell Chem. Biol. 2020, 27, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, J.; Lee, Y.; Jung, Y.M.; Park, J.H.; Yoo, H.S.; Park, J. Discovery of E3 Ligase Ligands for Target Protein Degradation. Molecules 2022, 27, 6515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sakamoto, K.M.; Kim, K.B.; Kumagai, A.; Mercurio, F.; Crews, C.M.; Deshaies, R.J. Protacs: Chimeric Molecules That Target Proteins to the Skp1-Cullin-F Box Complex for Ubiquitination and Degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 8554–8559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Smith, A.R.; Pucheault, M.; Tae, H.T.; Crews, C.M. Targeted Intracellular Protein Degradation Induced by a Small Molecule: En Route to Chemical Proteomics. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5904–5908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Békés, M.; Langley, D.R.; Crews, C.M. PROTAC targeted protein degraders: The past is prologue. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2022, 21, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pedrucci, F.; Pappalardo, C.; Marzaro, G.; Ferri, N.; Ferlin, A.; De Toni, L. Proteolysis Targeting Chimeric Molecules: Tuning Molecular Strategies for a Clinically Sound Listening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chambers-Richards, T.; Chireh, B.; D’Arcy, C. Unmet health care needs: Factors predicting satisfaction with health care services among community-dwelling Canadians living with neurological conditions. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2022, 22, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mamun, A.A.; Uddin, S.; Kabir, T.; Khanum, S.; Sarwar, S.; Mathew, B.; Rauf, A.; Ahmed, M.; Md Ashraf, G.M. Exploring the Promise of Targeting Ubiquitin-Proteasome System to Combat Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurotox. Res. 2020, 38, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, M.J.; Lee, J.H.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Tau degradation: The ubiquitin–proteasome system versus the autophagy-lysosome system. Prog. Neurobiol. 2013, 105, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Silva, M.C.; Ferguson, F.M.; Cai, Q.; Donovan, K.A.; Nandi, G.; Patnaik, D.; Zhang, T.; Huang, H.T.; Lucente, D.E.; Dickerson, B.C.; et al. Targeted degradation of aberrant tau in frontotemporal dementia patient-derived neuronal cell models. eLife 2019, 8, e45457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lipinski, C.A. Lead- and drug-like compounds: The rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2004, 1, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kurimchak, A.M.; Herrera-Montávez, C.; Montserrat-Sangrà, S.; Araiza-Olivera, D.; Hu, J.; Neumann-Domer, R.; Kuruvilla, M.; Bellacosa, A.; Testa, J.R.; Jin, J.; et al. The drug efflux pump MDR1 promotes intrinsic and acquired resistance to PROTACs in cancer cells. Sci. Signal. 2022, 15, eabn2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vagrys, D.; Davidson, J.; Chen, I.; Hubbard, R.E.; Davis, B. Exploring IDP–Ligand Interactions: Tau K18 as a Test Case. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, W.; Zhou, Q.; Jiang, T.; Li, S.; Ye, J.; Zhen, G.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Deng, M.; Ke, D.; et al. A Novel Small-molecule PROTAC Selectively Promotes Tau Clearance to Improve Cognitive Functions in Alzheimer-like Models. Theranostics 2021, 11, 5279–5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liang, M.; Gu, L.; Zhang, H.; Min, J.; Wang, Z.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zeng, S.; Pan, Y.; Yan, D.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Bioactivity of Novel Bifunctional Small Molecules for Alzheimer’s disease. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 26308–26315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kargbo, R.B. PROTAC Compounds Targeting α-Synuclein Protein for Treating Neurogenerative Disorders: Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 1086–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crew, A.P.; Dong, H.; Berlin, M.; Sparks, S.M. Proteolysis Targeting Chimeric (PROTAC) Compound with E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Binding Activity and Targeting Alpha-Synuclein Protein for Treating Neurovegetative Diseases. WO 2020/041331 A1, 27 February 2020. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bonfanti, S.; Lionetti, M.C.; Fumagalli, M.R.; Chirasani, V.R.; Tiana, G.; Dokholyan, N.V.; Zapperi, S.; La Porta, C.A.M. Molecular mechanisms of heterogeneous oligomerization of huntingtin proteins. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Irfan, Z.; Khanam, S.; Karmakar, V.; Firdous, S.M.; El Khier, B.S.I.A.; Khan, I.; Rehman, M.U.; Khan, A. Pathogenesis of Huntington’s Disease: An Emphasis on Molecular Pathways and Prevention by Natural Remedies. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tomoshige, S.; Nomura, S.; Ohgane, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Ishikawa, M. Discovery of Small Molecules that Induce the Degradation of Huntingtin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11530–11533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nation, D.A.; Sweeney, M.D.; Montagne, A.; Sagare, A.P.; D’Orazio, L.M.; Pachicano, M.; Sepehrband, F.; Nelson, A.R.; Buennagel, D.P.; Harrington, M.G.; et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kida, S.; Kinoshita, M.; Tanaka, S.; Okumura, M.; Koshimura, Y.; Morimoto, H. Non-clinical evaluation of a blood-brain barrier-penetrating enzyme for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2019, 126, S83–S84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Okuyama, T.; Eto, Y.; Sakai, N.; Minami, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Sonoda, H.; Yamaoka, M.; Tachibana, K.; Hirato, T.; Sato, Y. Iduronate-2-Sulfatase with Anti-human Transferrin Receptor Antibody for Neuropathic Mucopolysaccharidosis II: A Phase 1/2 Trial. Mol. Ther. 2019, 27, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Dragovich, P.S. Degrader-antibody conjugates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 3886–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hong, K.B.; An, H. Degrader-Antibody Conjugates: Emerging New Modality. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maneiro, M.; Forte, N.; Shchepinova, M.M.; Kounde, C.S.; Chudasama, V.; Baker, J.R.; Tate, E.W. Antibody-PROTAC Conjugates Enable HER2-Dependent Targeted Protein Degradation of BRD4. ACS Chem. Biol. 2020, 15, 1306–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lin, A.Y.; Dinner, N.S. Moxetumomab pasudotox for hairy cell leukemia: Preclinical development to FDA approval. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 2905–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Dragovich, P.S.; Adhikari, P.; Blake, R.A.; Blaquiere, N.; Chen, J.; Cheng, Y.X.; den Besten, W.; Han, J.; Hartman, S.J.; He, J.; et al. Antibody-mediated delivery of chimeric protein degraders which target estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 126907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dragovich, P.S.; Pillow, T.H.; Blake, R.A.; Sadowsky, J.D.; Adaligil, E.; Adhikari, P.; Bhakta, S.; Blaquiere, N.; Chen, J.; Cruz-Chuh, J.D.; et al. Antibody-Mediated Delivery of Chimeric BRD4 Degraders. Part 1: Exploration of Antibody Linker, Payload Loading, and Payload Molecular Properties. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 2534–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dragovich, P.S.; Pillow, T.H.; Blake, R.A.; Sadowsky, J.D.; Adaligil, E.; Adhikari, P.; Chen, J.; Corr, N.; Cruz-Chuh, J.D.; Del Rosario, G.D.; et al. Antibody-Mediated Delivery of Chimeric BRD4 Degraders. Part 2: Improvement of In Vitro Antiproliferation Activity and In Vivo Antitumor Efficacy. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 2576–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mankarious, S.; Lee, M.; Fischer, S.; Pyun, K.H.; Ochs, H.D.; Oxelius, V.A.; Wedgwood, J.W. The half-lives of IgG subclasses and specific antibodies in patients with primary immunodeficiency who are receiving intravenously administered immunoglobulin. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1988, 112, 634–640. [Google Scholar]
  52. Juan, A.; Noblejas-López, M.D.M.; Arenas-Moreira, M.; Alonso-Moreno, C.; Ocaña, A. Options to Improve the Action of PROTACs in Cancer: Development of Controlled Delivery Nanoparticles. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 9, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cimas, F.J.; Niza, E.; Juan, A.; Noblejas-López, M.d.M.; Bravo, I.; Lara-Sanchez, A.; Alonso-Moreno, C.; Ocaña, A. Controlled Delivery of BET-PROTACs: In Vitro Evaluation of MZ1-Loaded Polymeric Antibody Conjugated Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, A.P.; Aguet, F.; Danuser, G.; Schmid, S.L. Local clustering of transferrin receptors promotes clathrin-coated pit initiation. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191, 1381–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cureton, D.K.; Harbison, C.E.; Cocucci, E.; Parrish, C.R.; Kirchhausen, T. Limited Transferrin Receptor Clustering Allows Rapid Diffusion of Canine Parvovirus into Clathrin Endocytic Structures. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 5330–5340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Laughlin, C.D.; D’Aquili, E.G. Biogenetic Structuralism; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  57. Leavy, S.A. Biogenetic Structuralism. Yale J. Biol. Med. 1976, 49, 420–421. [Google Scholar]
Antibodies 12 00043 g001 550
Figure 1. The structure of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) and the pathway of target protein degradation by PROTACs.
Figure 1. The structure of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) and the pathway of target protein degradation by PROTACs.
Antibodies 12 00043 g001
Antibodies 12 00043 g002 550
Figure 2. The pathway of intravenously administered PROTAC-antibody conjugates (PACs) against receptors (the light blue sphere) such as a transferrin receptor via a linker. PACs were internalized into the capillary endothelial cells.
Figure 2. The pathway of intravenously administered PROTAC-antibody conjugates (PACs) against receptors (the light blue sphere) such as a transferrin receptor via a linker. PACs were internalized into the capillary endothelial cells.
Antibodies 12 00043 g002
Antibodies 12 00043 g003 550
Figure 3. The pathway of ubiquitin proteasome system. Abbreviations: E1, ubiquitin-activating enzyme; E2, ubiquitin conjugase; E3, ubiquitin ligase; Ub, ubiquitin; PP, diphosphoric acid.
Figure 3. The pathway of ubiquitin proteasome system. Abbreviations: E1, ubiquitin-activating enzyme; E2, ubiquitin conjugase; E3, ubiquitin ligase; Ub, ubiquitin; PP, diphosphoric acid.
Antibodies 12 00043 g003
Antibodies 12 00043 g004 550
Figure 4. The structures of X-protein and anti-X-protein PROTACs. The oligomerization domain (shown in red) acts as an X-protein ligand. The instability domain (shown in green) as a degron peptide acts as an E3 ligase ligand. Although R8 is a main cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) (shown in blue) in the molecule, X-entry is a type of CPP.
Figure 4. The structures of X-protein and anti-X-protein PROTACs. The oligomerization domain (shown in red) acts as an X-protein ligand. The instability domain (shown in green) as a degron peptide acts as an E3 ligase ligand. Although R8 is a main cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) (shown in blue) in the molecule, X-entry is a type of CPP.
Antibodies 12 00043 g004
Antibodies 12 00043 g005 550
Figure 5. The structure of AP21998/ hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 1α-based PROTAC, composed of AP21998 as a FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) ligand, the ALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligand, and D-R8 as a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP), and dihydrotestosterone (DHT)/HIF 1α-based PROTAC, composed of DHT as an androgen receptor (AR) ligand, the ALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligand, and D-R8.
Figure 5. The structure of AP21998/ hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 1α-based PROTAC, composed of AP21998 as a FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) ligand, the ALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligand, and D-R8 as a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP), and dihydrotestosterone (DHT)/HIF 1α-based PROTAC, composed of DHT as an androgen receptor (AR) ligand, the ALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligand, and D-R8.
Antibodies 12 00043 g005
Antibodies 12 00043 g006 550
Figure 6. The structures of TH006 with a VHL ligand, a tau ligand, and D-R8 as a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP), a peptide-based PROTAC with Kelch-like ECH-associated protein-1 (Keap1) ligand as an E3 ligase ligand, a tau ligand, and D-R8, and a peptide-based PROTAC with an α-synuclein ligand, an E3 ligase ligand, and TAT as a CPP.
Figure 6. The structures of TH006 with a VHL ligand, a tau ligand, and D-R8 as a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP), a peptide-based PROTAC with Kelch-like ECH-associated protein-1 (Keap1) ligand as an E3 ligase ligand, a tau ligand, and D-R8, and a peptide-based PROTAC with an α-synuclein ligand, an E3 ligase ligand, and TAT as a CPP.
Antibodies 12 00043 g006
Antibodies 12 00043 g007 550
Figure 7. The structures of the first proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) and the first small molecule-based PROTAC.
Figure 7. The structures of the first proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) and the first small molecule-based PROTAC.
Antibodies 12 00043 g007
Antibodies 12 00043 g008 550
Figure 8. The structures of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) under clinical trials.
Figure 8. The structures of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) under clinical trials.
Antibodies 12 00043 g008
Antibodies 12 00043 g009 550
Figure 9. The structures of anti-tau PROTCs such as QC-01-175, C004019, and I3. The CLogP values were calculated by the software (ChemDraw Ultra version 7.0.1. provided from CambridgeSoft Corporation).
Figure 9. The structures of anti-tau PROTCs such as QC-01-175, C004019, and I3. The CLogP values were calculated by the software (ChemDraw Ultra version 7.0.1. provided from CambridgeSoft Corporation).
Antibodies 12 00043 g009
Antibodies 12 00043 g010 550
Figure 10. The structures of small molecule-based PROTACs for Parkinson’s disease (PD).
Figure 10. The structures of small molecule-based PROTACs for Parkinson’s disease (PD).
Antibodies 12 00043 g010
Antibodies 12 00043 g011 550
Figure 11. The structures of PROTACs for Huntington’s disease (HD).
Figure 11. The structures of PROTACs for Huntington’s disease (HD).
Antibodies 12 00043 g011
Antibodies 12 00043 g012 550
Figure 12. The structure of trastuzumab-PROTAC conjugate with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligand.
Figure 12. The structure of trastuzumab-PROTAC conjugate with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligand.
Antibodies 12 00043 g012
Antibodies 12 00043 g013 550
Figure 13. The structure of anti-HER2 antibody-PROTAC conjugate with an ER ligand and a VHL ligand.
Figure 13. The structure of anti-HER2 antibody-PROTAC conjugate with an ER ligand and a VHL ligand.
Antibodies 12 00043 g013
Antibodies 12 00043 g014 550
Figure 14. The structures of anti-STEAP1 antibody-PROTAC conjugates, STEAP1-5a and STEAP1-9d, with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligand.
Figure 14. The structures of anti-STEAP1 antibody-PROTAC conjugates, STEAP1-5a and STEAP1-9d, with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligand.
Antibodies 12 00043 g014
Table
Table 1. Summary of clinical trials focusing on proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) described in this review.
Table 1. Summary of clinical trials focusing on proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) described in this review.
#DrugRouteE3 LigandTarget Protein LigandDiseaseSponsorPhaseStudy Start DateStudy Completion DateClinicalTrials.gov Identifier
(accessed on 15 January 2023)		Status
(i)AC682OralCRBNERCancerAccutar Biotechnology, Inc.Phase 112 November 2021September 2023NCT05080842Recruiting
(ii)CC-94676OralCRBNNon-steroidal ARCancerCelgenePhase 122 June 202027 February 2025NCT04428788Recruiting
(iii)DT2216IntravenousVHLBcl-XLCancerDialectic Therapeutics, Inc.Phase 125 August 202115 April 2023NCT04886622Recruiting
(iv)FHD-609IntravenousCRBNBRD9CancerFoghorn Therapeutics, Inc.Phase 117 August 202131 May 2025NCT04965753Recruiting
(v)KT-474OralCRBNIRAK4CancerKymera Therapeutics, Inc.Phase 123 February 202120 October 2022NCT04772885Completed
(vi)KT-413IntravenousCRBNIRAK4CancerKymera Therapeutics, Inc.Phase 113 June 2022May 2025NCT05233033Recruiting
(vii)NX-2127OralCRBNBTKCancerNurix Therapeutics, Inc.Phase 15 May 2021November 2023NCT04830137Recruiting
(viii)NX-5948OralCRBNBTKCancerNurix Therapeutics, Inc.Phase 113 April 2022May 2024NCT05131022Recruiting
(ix)ARV-110OralCRBNNon-steroidal ARCancerArvinas Androgen Receptor, Inc.Phase 1
Phase 2		1 March 201931 October 2023NCT03888612Recruiting
(x)ARV-471OralCRBNER ligandCancerArvinas Estrogen Receptor, Inc.Phase 1
Phase 2		5 August 2019June 2023NCT04072952Recruiting
(xi)ARV-766OralVHLBRD4CancerArvinas Androgen Receptor, Inc.Phase 1
Phase 2		2 September 202127 June 2025NCT05067140Recruiting
Table
Table 2. All compounds introduced in this perspective review.
Table 2. All compounds introduced in this perspective review.
#Administrated drugFormulationReceptor for endocytosisDiseaseVectorTarget Protein LigandE3 LigandStatusReferences
(1)Anti-X-protein peptide-based PROTACsPROTACs with the oligomerization domain, degron peptide, and R8Heparan sulfate proteoglycansCancerR8 and X-entry as CPPsOligomerization domain of the X-protein as an X-protein ligandDegron peptide of the X-protein as an E3 ligandIn vitro basic research[17]
(2)AP21998/ hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 1α-based PROTACPROTAC with AP21998, ALAPYIP sequence, and D-R8Heparan sulfate proteoglycans-D-R8 as a CPPAP21998 as an FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) ligand,ALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[18]
(3)Dihydrotestosterone (DHT)/HIF 1α-based PROTACPROTAC with DHT, ALAPYIP sequence, and D-R8Heparan sulfate proteoglycansCancerD-R as a CPPDHT as an androgen receptor (AR) ligandALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[18]
(4)TH006Peptide-based PROTAC with a tau ligand, ALAPYIP sequence, and D-R8Heparan sulfate proteoglycansAlzheimer’s diseaseD-R as a CPPTau ligandALAPYIP sequence as a VHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[19]
(5)Peptide-based PROTACPeptide-based PROTAC with a tau ligand, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein-1 (Keap1) ligand, and D-R8Heparan sulfate proteoglycansAlzheimer’s diseaseD-R as a CPPTau ligandKeap1 ligand as an E3 ligase ligandIn vitro Basic research[20]
(6)Peptide-based PROTACPeptide-based PROTACs with an α-synuclein ligand, the E3 ligase ligand, and TATHeparan sulfate proteoglycansParkinson’s diseaseTAT as a CPPα-Synuclein ligandE3 ligase ligandIn vitro Basic research[21]
(7)Protac-1 as the first PROTACProtac with ovalicin and the IκBα phosphopeptide----Ovalicin to bind methionine aminopeptidase-2IκBα phosphopeptide to bind β-TRCP contained in the Skp1-Cullin-F box E3 ligase complexIn vitro Basic research[23]
(8)The first small molecule-based PROTACPROTAC with a non-steroidal AR ligand and nutlin-Cancer-Non-steroidal AR ligandNutlin as an E3 ligase ligandIn vitro Basic research[24]
(9)ARV-110 as the first PROTAC entering the clinical trial testPTOTAC with a non-steroidal AR ligand and a CRBN ligand-Cancer-Non-steroidal AR ligandCRBN ligandphase 1
phase 2		(Table 1)
[25,26]
(10)Eight PROTACs under clinical trialsSmall molecule-based PROTAC with a target protein ligand and an E3 ligase ligand-Canceer-Target protein ligandE3 ligase ligandphase 1(Table 1)
[25,26]
(11)Three PROTACs under clinical trials including ARV-110Small molecule-based PROTAC with a target protein ligand and an E3 ligase ligand-Cancer-Target protein ligandE3 ligase ligandphase 1
phase 2		(Table 1)
[25,26]
(12)QC-01-175PROTAC with 18F-T807 derivative and a CRBN ligand-Alzheimer’s disease-18F-T807 derivative as a tau ligandCRBN ligandIn vitro Basic research[30]
(13)C004019PROTAC with ID220149 and a VHL ligand-Alzheimer’s disease-ID220149 as a tau ligandVHL ligandIn vivo Basic research[34]
(14)I3PROTACs with THK5105 derivative and a CRBN ligand-Alzheimer’s disease-THK5105 derivative as a tau ligandCRBN ligandIn vitro Basic research[35]
(15)Small molecule-based PROTACsPROTACs with an α-synuclein ligand and a VHL ligand-Parkinson’s disease-α-Synuclein ligandVHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[36,37]
(16)Small molecule-based PROTACsPROTACs with a huntingtin ligand and a cIAP ligand-Huntington’s disease-Huntingtin ligandcIAP ligandIn vitro Basic research[40]
(17)Idursulfase betaAnti-transferrin receptor antibody fused to iduronate-2-sulfataseTransferrin receptorHunter syndromeAnti-transferrin receptor antibody--Launched in 2021[43]
(18)Trastuzumab-PROTAC conjugatePROTAC-antibody conjugate with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligandHER2CancerAnti-HER2 antibodyBRD4 ligandVHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[46]
(19)Anti-HER2 antibody-PROTAC conjugatePROTAC-antibody conjugate with an ER ligand and a VHL ligandHER2CancerAnti-HER2 antibodyER ligandVHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[48]
(20)STEAP1-5aPROTAC-antibody conjugate with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligandSTEAP1CancerAnti-STEAP1 antibodyBRD4 ligandVHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[49]
(21)STEAP1-9dPROTAC-antibody conjugate with a BRD4 ligand and a VHL ligandSTEAP1CancerAnti-STEAP1 antibodyBRD4 ligandVHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[50]
(22)NanoPROTACs covered with trastuzumabPROTAC-encapsulated nanoparticles covered with antibodiesHER2CancerAnti-HER2 antibodyBRD4 ligandVHL ligandIn vitro Basic research[53]
(23)PROTAC-antibody conjugatePROTAC-antibody conjugate with a tau ligand and an E3 ligase ligandTransferrin receptorAlzheimer’s diseaseAnti-transferrin receptor antibodyTau ligandE3 ligase ligandUnder analysis in Tashima lab-
(24)NanoPROTACs covered with antibodiesPROTAC-encapsulated nanoparticles covered with antibodiesTransferrin receptorAlzheimer’s diseaseAnti-transferrin receptor antibodyTau ligandE3 ligase ligandUnder analysis in Tashima lab-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tashima, T. Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Delivery into the Brain across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Antibodies 2023, 12, 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib12030043

AMA Style

Tashima T. Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Delivery into the Brain across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Antibodies. 2023; 12(3):43. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib12030043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tashima, Toshihiko. 2023. "Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Delivery into the Brain across the Blood-Brain Barrier" Antibodies 12, no. 3: 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib12030043

APA Style

Tashima, T. (2023). Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera (PROTAC) Delivery into the Brain across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Antibodies, 12(3), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/antib12030043

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop