Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (15)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pedicle drilling

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 1079 KiB  
Technical Note
Visuohaptic Feedback in Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery for Pedicle Screw Placement
by Giuseppe Loggia, Fedan Avrumova and Darren R. Lebl
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3804; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113804 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 651
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic-assisted (RA) spine surgery enhances pedicle screw placement accuracy through real-time navigation and trajectory guidance. However, the absence of traditional direct haptic feedback by freehand instrumentation remains a concern for some, particularly in minimally invasive (MIS) procedures where direct visual confirmation [...] Read more.
Introduction: Robotic-assisted (RA) spine surgery enhances pedicle screw placement accuracy through real-time navigation and trajectory guidance. However, the absence of traditional direct haptic feedback by freehand instrumentation remains a concern for some, particularly in minimally invasive (MIS) procedures where direct visual confirmation is limited. During RA spine surgery, navigation systems display three-dimensional data, but factors such as registration errors, intraoperative motion, and anatomical variability may compromise accuracy. This technical note describes a visuohaptic intraoperative phenomenon observed during RA spine surgery, its underlying mechanical principles, and its utility. During pedicle screw insertion with a slow-speed automated drill in RA spine procedures, a subtle and rhythmic variation in resistance has been observed both visually on the navigation interface and haptically through the handheld drill. This intraoperative pattern is referred to in this report as a cyclical insertional torque (CIT) pattern and has been noted across multiple cases. The CIT pattern is hypothesized to result from localized stick–slip dynamics, where alternating phases of resistance and release at the bone–screw interface generate periodic torque fluctuations. The pattern is most pronounced at low insertion speeds and diminishes with increasing drill velocity. CIT is a newly described intraoperative observation that may provide visuohaptic feedback during pedicle screw insertion in RA spine surgery. Through slow-speed automated drilling, CIT offers a cue for bone engagement, which could support intraoperative awareness in scenarios where tactile feedback is reduced or visual confirmation is indirect. While CIT may enhance surgeon confidence during screw advancement, its clinical relevance, reproducibility, and impact on placement accuracy have yet to be validated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Spine Surgery: Best Practices and Future Directions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 17076 KiB  
Article
Enhancing the Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Using 3D-Printed Screw-Guiding Techniques in the Lumbosacral Region for Small Breed Dogs: A Cadaveric Study
by Jin-Yeong Kim, Ho-Hyun Kwak, Heung-Myong Woo and Junhyung Kim
Animals 2025, 15(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15010014 - 25 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1332
Abstract
A 3D-printed guide is an effective method for accurately placing pedicle screws in dog vertebrae. While a conventional drill guide allows precise pilot hole formation, it can lead to potential screw wobbling during insertion. In this study, we applied a technique that assists [...] Read more.
A 3D-printed guide is an effective method for accurately placing pedicle screws in dog vertebrae. While a conventional drill guide allows precise pilot hole formation, it can lead to potential screw wobbling during insertion. In this study, we applied a technique that assists with both drilling and screw insertion, and we compared the accuracy of screw placement using this approach with that achieved by the conventional drill guide. The screws were divided into three groups: Group A (drill guide), Group B (cannulated guide), and Group C (screw guide). The accuracy of screw placement was assessed by comparing preoperative and postoperative CT images. Group A exhibited the largest angular deviation. Group C exhibited significantly smaller deviations in entry point, exit point, angle α, and angular deviation than Group A. In Group B, only the exit-point deviation was significantly smaller than that in Group A. Furthermore, the angular deviation in Group C was significantly smaller than that in Group B. In conclusion, 3D-printed screw-guiding techniques improved the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, with screw guides outperforming cannulated guides, making them a viable option for small breed dogs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Clinical Studies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2757 KiB  
Article
Resection of Calcified and Giant Thoracic Disc Herniation Through Bilateral Postero-Lateral Approach and 360° Cord Release: A Technical Note
by Ismail Zaed, Benjamin Pommier, Gabriele Capo and Cédric Y. Barrey
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(22), 6807; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226807 - 12 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1379
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Surgical treatment of thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is risky and technically demanding due to its proximity to the spinal cord and the high possibility of the TDH being calcified (up to 40%), making the resection even more complex. Calcified TDH may be [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Surgical treatment of thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is risky and technically demanding due to its proximity to the spinal cord and the high possibility of the TDH being calcified (up to 40%), making the resection even more complex. Calcified TDH may be resected from an anterior via thoracotomy/thoracoscopy, lateral extra-cavitary, or a postero-lateral approach. Here, we present our experience in managing such pathology with an original technique Methods: This original technique, used successfully in more than 40 patients, is introduced, with a precise description of the surgical anatomy and the surgical steps to take. Indications for surgical management and neurological outcomes are also analyzed. This surgical approach consisted of transverso-pediculectomy, most often bilaterally, partial vertebral body drilling, 360° release of the cord, and short fixation. Results: A total of 44 patients were collected, with a mean age of 52.4 ± 11.7 years. Seven patients (15.9%) had complete calcifications, and thirty-one had partial calcifications (70.5%), while the remaining six did not have signs of calcifications. There were only 4 intraoperative complications (2 dural tears and 2 loss of evoked potentials). The TDH could be resected in total for 39 patients (88.6%) and partially, according to the “floating” technique, in 5 patients (11.4%). In the postoperative follow-up, all of the patients except two (presenting with sensory aggravation) reported an improvement in neurological conditions leading to an overall risk of neurological aggravation of 4.5%. Conclusions: The bilateral postero-lateral approach provides a large decompression of the cord (360°) and gives safe access to the TDH, even calcified, permitting high rates of total resection. It also prevents any prejudicial pressure on the spinal cord, reducing the risk of severe postoperative deficits and permitting optimal instrumentation (pedicle screw-based) of the spinal segment. The surgical sequence to resect the bony structures around the spinal cord is of great importance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Surgery and Rehabilitation: Current Advances and Future Options)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 248 KiB  
Review
Accuracy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement for Treating Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Narrative Review Comparing Available Techniques
by Alexandre Ansorge, Vishal Sarwahi, Ludmilla Bazin, Oscar Vazquez, Giacomo De Marco and Romain Dayer
Diagnostics 2023, 13(14), 2402; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13142402 - 18 Jul 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3172
Abstract
Posterior spinal fusion and segmental spinal instrumentation using pedicle screws (PS) is the most used procedure to correct adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Computed navigation, robotic navigation, and patient-specific drill templates are available, besides the first described free-hand technique. None of these techniques are recognized [...] Read more.
Posterior spinal fusion and segmental spinal instrumentation using pedicle screws (PS) is the most used procedure to correct adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Computed navigation, robotic navigation, and patient-specific drill templates are available, besides the first described free-hand technique. None of these techniques are recognized as the gold standard. This review compares the PS placement accuracy and misplacement-related complication rates achieved with the techniques mentioned above. It further reports PS accuracy classifications and anatomic PS misplacement risk factors. The literature suggests a higher PS placement accuracy for robotic relative to computed navigation and for the latter relative to the free-hand technique (misplacement rates: 0.4–7.2% versus 1.9–11% versus 1.5–50.7%) using variable accuracy classifications. The reported PS-misplacement-related complication rates are, however, uniformly low (0–1.4%) for every technique, while robotic and computed navigation induce a roughly fourfold increase in the patient’s intraoperative radiation exposure relative to the free-hand technique with fluoroscopic implant positioning control. The authors, therefore, recommend dedicating robotic and computed navigation for complex deformities or revisions with altered landmarks, underline the need for a generally accepted PS accuracy classification, and advise against PS placement in grade 4 pedicles yielding higher misplacement rates (22.2–31.5%). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
8 pages, 1624 KiB  
Article
Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screws Inserted Using Three Different Techniques: A Biomechanical Study on Polyurethane Foam Block
by Lien-Chen Wu, Yueh-Ying Hsieh, Fon-Yih Tsuang, Yi-Jie Kuo, Chia-Hsien Chen and Chang-Jung Chiang
Bioengineering 2023, 10(6), 660; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060660 - 30 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4431
Abstract
Pullout strength is an important indicator of the performance and longevity of pedicle screws and can be heavily influenced by the screw design, the insertion technique and the quality of surrounding bone. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pullout strength [...] Read more.
Pullout strength is an important indicator of the performance and longevity of pedicle screws and can be heavily influenced by the screw design, the insertion technique and the quality of surrounding bone. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pullout strength of three different pedicle screws inserted using three different strategies and with two different loading conditions. Three pedicle screws with different thread designs (single-lead-thread (SLT) screw, dual-lead-thread (DLT) screw and mixed-single-lead-thread (MSLT) screw) were inserted into a pre-drilled rigid polyurethane foam block using three strategies: (A) screw inserted to a depth of 33.5 mm; (B) screw inserted to a depth of 33.5 mm and then reversed by 3.5 mm to simulate an adjustment of the tulip height of the pedicle screw and (C) screw inserted to a depth of 30 mm. After insertion, each screw type was set up with and without a cyclic load being applied to the screw head prior to the pullout test. To ensure that the normality assumption is met, we applied the Shapiro–Wilk test to all datasets before conducting the non-parametric statistical test (Kruskal–Wallis test combined with pairwise Mann–Whitney-U tests). All screw types inserted using strategy A had a significantly greater pullout strength than those inserted using strategies B and C, regardless of if the screw was pre-loaded with a cyclic load prior to testing. Without the use of the cyclic pre-load, the MSLT screw had a greater pullout strength than the SLT and DLT screws for all three insertion strategies. However, the fixation strength of all screws was reduced when pre-loaded before testing, with the MSLT screw inserted using strategy B producing a significantly lower pullout strength than all other groups (p < 0.05). In contrast, the MSLT screw using insertion strategies A and C had a greater pullout strength than the SLT and DLT screws both with and without pre-loading. In conclusion, the MSLT pedicle screw exhibited the greatest pullout strength of the screws tested under all insertion strategies and loading conditions, except for insertion strategy B with a cyclic pre-load. While all screw types showed a reduced pullout strength when using insertion strategy B (screw-out depth adjustment), the MSLT screw had the largest reduction in pullout strength when using a pre-load before testing. Based on these findings, during the initial screw insertion, it is recommended to not fully insert the screw thread into the bone and to leave a retention length for depth adjustment to avoid the need for screw-out adjustment, as with insertion strategy B. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Engineering Technology in Orthopaedic Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 11360 KiB  
Article
Reduction in Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement Using a Tubular Retractor: A Pilot Study
by Takeshi Oki, Alan Kawarai Lefor, Kentaro Nakamura, Takahiro Higashi and Isao Oki
Tomography 2023, 9(1), 12-24; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9010002 - 20 Dec 2022
Viewed by 4420
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is a minimally invasive spinal procedure that has been rapidly adopted over the last decade. However, PPS placement has elicited fear of increased radiation exposure from some surgeons, medical staff, and patients. This is because [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is a minimally invasive spinal procedure that has been rapidly adopted over the last decade. However, PPS placement has elicited fear of increased radiation exposure from some surgeons, medical staff, and patients. This is because PPS placement is performed using a K-wire, and the operator must perform K-wire insertion into the pedicle under fluoroscopy. In order to prevent erroneous insertion, there are many occasions when direct insertion is required during radiation exposure, and the amount of radiation exposure to hands and fingers in particular increases. Although these problems are being addressed by navigation systems, these systems are still expensive and not widely available. Attempts have been made to address this situation using instrumentation commonly used in spinal surgery. First, it was considered to visualize anatomical bone markers using a tubular retractor and a microscope. In addition, the use of a self-drilling pin was adopted to locate the pedicle in a narrower field of view. Based on these considerations, a minimally invasive and highly accurate pedicle screw placement technique was developed while avoiding direct radiation exposure. This study evaluated radiation exposure and accuracy of pedicle screw placement using this new procedure in one-level, minimally invasive, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively to review pedicle screw placement in single-level MIS TLIFs using a tubular retractor under a microscope. The total fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and screw placement accuracy were reviewed. Extension of operating time was also evaluated. Results: Twenty-four patients underwent single-level MIS TLIFs, with placement of 96 pedicle screws. There were 15 females and 9 males, with an average age of 64.8 years and a mean body mass index of 25.5 kg/m2. The mean operating time was 201.8 min. The mean fluoroscopic time was 26.8 s. The mean radiation dose of the area dose product was 0.0706 mGy∗m2. The mean radiation dose of air kerma was 6.0 mGy. The mean radiation dose of the entrance skin dose was 11.31 mGy. Postoperative computed tomography scans demonstrated 93 pedicle screws confined to the pedicle (97%) and three pedicle screw breaches (3.2%; two lateral, one medial). A patient with screw deviation of the medial pedicle wall developed right-foot numbness necessitating reoperation. There were no complications after reoperation. The average added time with this combined procedure was 39 min (range 16–69 min) per patient. Conclusions: This novel pedicle screw insertion technique compares favorably with other reports in terms of radiation exposure reduction and accuracy and is also useful from the viewpoint of avoiding direct radiation exposure to hands and fingers. It is economical because it uses existing spinal surgical instrumentation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiation Protection Opportunities in Medical Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2873 KiB  
Article
A Novel Point Set Registration-Based Hand–Eye Calibration Method for Robot-Assisted Surgery
by Wenyuan Sun, Jihao Liu, Yuyun Zhao and Guoyan Zheng
Sensors 2022, 22(21), 8446; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218446 - 3 Nov 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3723
Abstract
Pedicle screw insertion with robot assistance dramatically improves surgical accuracy and safety when compared with manual implantation. In developing such a system, hand–eye calibration is an essential component that aims to determine the transformation between a position tracking and robot-arm systems. In this [...] Read more.
Pedicle screw insertion with robot assistance dramatically improves surgical accuracy and safety when compared with manual implantation. In developing such a system, hand–eye calibration is an essential component that aims to determine the transformation between a position tracking and robot-arm systems. In this paper, we propose an effective hand–eye calibration method, namely registration-based hand–eye calibration (RHC), which estimates the calibration transformation via point set registration without the need to solve the AX=XB equation. Our hand–eye calibration method consists of tool-tip pivot calibrations in two-coordinate systems, in addition to paired-point matching, where the point pairs are generated via the steady movement of the robot arm in space. After calibration, our system allows for robot-assisted, image-guided pedicle screw insertion. Comprehensive experiments are conducted to verify the efficacy of the proposed hand–eye calibration method. A mean distance deviation of 0.70 mm and a mean angular deviation of 0.68° are achieved by our system when the proposed hand–eye calibration method is used. Further experiments on drilling trajectories are conducted on plastic vertebrae as well as pig vertebrae. A mean distance deviation of 1.01 mm and a mean angular deviation of 1.11° are observed when the drilled trajectories are compared with the planned trajectories on the pig vertebrae. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 7479 KiB  
Article
AR-Supported Supervision of Conditional Autonomous Robots: Considerations for Pedicle Screw Placement in the Future
by Josefine Schreiter, Danny Schott, Lovis Schwenderling, Christian Hansen, Florian Heinrich and Fabian Joeres
J. Imaging 2022, 8(10), 255; https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8100255 - 21 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3202
Abstract
Robotic assistance is applied in orthopedic interventions for pedicle screw placement (PSP). While current robots do not act autonomously, they are expected to have higher autonomy under surgeon supervision in the mid-term. Augmented reality (AR) is promising to support this supervision and to [...] Read more.
Robotic assistance is applied in orthopedic interventions for pedicle screw placement (PSP). While current robots do not act autonomously, they are expected to have higher autonomy under surgeon supervision in the mid-term. Augmented reality (AR) is promising to support this supervision and to enable human–robot interaction (HRI). To outline a futuristic scenario for robotic PSP, the current workflow was analyzed through literature review and expert discussion. Based on this, a hypothetical workflow of the intervention was developed, which additionally contains the analysis of the necessary information exchange between human and robot. A video see-through AR prototype was designed and implemented. A robotic arm with an orthopedic drill mock-up simulated the robotic assistance. The AR prototype included a user interface to enable HRI. The interface provides data to facilitate understanding of the robot’s ”intentions”, e.g., patient-specific CT images, the current workflow phase, or the next planned robot motion. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional visualization illustrated patient-specific medical data and the drilling process. The findings of this work contribute a valuable approach in terms of addressing future clinical needs and highlighting the importance of AR support for HRI. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 5600 KiB  
Article
Anterior Pedicled Nasal Flap in Frontal Sinus Drill-Out Patients: A Randomised Controlled Pilot Study
by Mark Bastianelli, Lucy Huang, Paige Moore, Isma Zafar Iqbal, Charmaine M. Woods and Eng H. Ooi
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4329; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154329 - 26 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2131
Abstract
Background: The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is a common procedure performed in patients with frontal sinus pathology. While performing this procedure, large segments of bone are exposed, which may lead to the promotion of frontal sinus neo-ostium stenosis. Here we examine the [...] Read more.
Background: The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is a common procedure performed in patients with frontal sinus pathology. While performing this procedure, large segments of bone are exposed, which may lead to the promotion of frontal sinus neo-ostium stenosis. Here we examine the peri-operative differences in time to achieve healing in patients where a mucosal flap is used to cover the exposed bone on one side of the neo-ostium. Design: A randomised pilot study with 12 patients undergoing EMLP surgery participated in this study. Methods: Patients were randomised to undergo a mucosal flap on either the left or right side of the neo-ostium. Prior to surgery, patients completed a SNOT-22 and smell identification test. Patients were reviewed until the neo-ostium had healed on both sides. Once healing had occurred, a post-operative SNOT-22 score and smell identification test were recorded. Results: Average time to healing for the frontal sinus neo-ostium was 4.7 vs. 4.2 (p = 0.3) on the flap vs. non-flap side, respectively. There was an average 24.4 point (range: −75 to +9) decrease in SNOT-22 scores post-surgery. The post-operative USPIT score demonstrated an average increase of 6.6 points (range −13 to +27). Conclusion: We did not detect significant differences in peri-operative time toward healing in neo-ostiums where a single flap is utilised. Further studies are needed to determine whether the usage of a single neo-ostium flap affords any benefit over no flap on either ostium. SNOT-22 and UPSIT scores improved post-surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 24324 KiB  
Article
The Accuracy of Patient-Specific Spinal Drill Guides Is Non-Inferior to Computer-Assisted Surgery: The Results of a Split-Spine Randomized Controlled Trial
by Peter A. J. Pijpker, Jos M. A. Kuijlen, Katalin Tamási, D. L. Marinus Oterdoom, Rob A. Vergeer, Gijs Rijtema, Maarten H. Coppes, Joep Kraeima and Rob J. M. Groen
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(7), 1084; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12071084 - 30 Jun 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2200
Abstract
In recent years, patient-specific spinal drill guides (3DPGs) have gained widespread popularity. Several studies have shown that the accuracy of screw insertion with these guides is superior to that obtained using the freehand insertion technique, but there are no studies that make a [...] Read more.
In recent years, patient-specific spinal drill guides (3DPGs) have gained widespread popularity. Several studies have shown that the accuracy of screw insertion with these guides is superior to that obtained using the freehand insertion technique, but there are no studies that make a comparison with computer-assisted surgery (CAS). The aim of this study was to determine whether the accuracy of insertion of spinal screws using 3DPGs is non-inferior to insertion via CAS. A randomized controlled split-spine study was performed in which 3DPG and CAS were randomly assigned to the left or right sides of the spines of patients undergoing fixation surgery. The 3D measured accuracy of screw insertion was the primary study outcome parameter. Sixty screws inserted in 10 patients who completed the study protocol were used for the non-inferiority analysis. The non-inferiority of 3DPG was demonstrated for entry-point accuracy, as the upper margin of the 95% CI (−1.01 mm–0.49 mm) for the difference between the means did not cross the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 1 mm (p < 0.05). We also demonstrated non-inferiority of 3D angular accuracy (p < 0.05), with a 95% CI for the true difference of −2.30°–1.35°, not crossing the predetermined non-inferiority margin of 3° (p < 0.05). The results of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that 3DPGs provide a non-inferior alternative to CAS in terms of screw insertion accuracy and have considerable potential as a navigational technique in spinal fixation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 6171 KiB  
Article
Vital Role of In-House 3D Lab to Create Unprecedented Solutions for Challenges in Spinal Surgery, Practical Guidelines and Clinical Case Series
by Koen Willemsen, Joëll Magré, Jeroen Mol, Herke Jan Noordmans, Harrie Weinans, Edsko E. G. Hekman and Moyo C. Kruyt
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(3), 395; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030395 - 4 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3227
Abstract
For decades, the advantages of rapid prototyping for clinical use have been recognized. However, demonstrations of potential solutions to treat spinal problems that cannot be solved otherwise are scarce. In this paper, we describe the development, regulatory process, and clinical application of two [...] Read more.
For decades, the advantages of rapid prototyping for clinical use have been recognized. However, demonstrations of potential solutions to treat spinal problems that cannot be solved otherwise are scarce. In this paper, we describe the development, regulatory process, and clinical application of two types of patient specific 3D-printed devices that were developed at an in-house 3D point-of-care facility. This 3D lab made it possible to elegantly treat patients with spinal problems that could not have been treated in a conventional manner. The first device, applied in three patients, is a printed nylon drill guide, with such accuracy that it can be used for insertion of cervical pedicle screws in very young children, which has been applied even in semi-acute settings. The other is a 3D-printed titanium spinal column prosthesis that was used to treat progressive and severe deformities due to lysis of the anterior column in three patients. The unique opportunity to control size, shape, and material characteristics allowed a relatively easy solution for these patients, who were developing paraplegia. In this paper, we discuss the pathway toward the design and final application, including technical file creation for dossier building and challenges within a point-of-care lab. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Methodology, Drug and Device Discovery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 1963 KiB  
Article
Cutting Flute and Thread Design on Self-Tapping Pedicle Screws Influence the Insertion Torque and Pullout Strength
by Lien-Chen Wu, Yueh-Ying Hsieh, Fon-Yih Tsuang, Yi-Jie Kuo and Chang-Jung Chiang
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(4), 1956; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041956 - 13 Feb 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 7433
Abstract
Self-tapping screws are commonly used in trauma and maxillofacial surgery and are increasingly used for pedicle screw insertions. In order to evaluate how the quantity and length of cutting flutes on self-tapping pedicle screws affect the insertion torque and pullout strength, eight different [...] Read more.
Self-tapping screws are commonly used in trauma and maxillofacial surgery and are increasingly used for pedicle screw insertions. In order to evaluate how the quantity and length of cutting flutes on self-tapping pedicle screws affect the insertion torque and pullout strength, eight different self-tapping pedicle screw designs were evaluated. All screws had a threaded length of 35 mm and featured variations in the number of leads, as well as the length and quantity of cutting flutes. Five samples of each design were inserted into pre-drilled, untapped holes (ø2.7 mm, length 35 mm) in sawbone blocks of density 20 PCF. The insertion torque and pullout strength were measured according to ASTM F543. The results showed that screws with a longer cutting flute of 9.5 mm had a lower mean maximum insertion torque than screws with shorter 2.9 mm cutting flutes. Pedicle screws with a double-lead thread design had a greater insertion torque than their single-lead counterparts, and the use of three cutting flutes produced a lower torque than two cutting flutes. The results demonstrated a greater pullout strength in screws with a single-lead thread rather than a double-lead, three cutting flutes instead of two, and a longer length for the cutting flute. In conclusion, to provide immediate stability and reduce the surgical insertion time, a single-lead, self-tapping pedicle screw incorporating three long cutting flutes is recommended because of the significantly greater pullout strength. This design could also reduce the risk of implant loosening in comparison to double-lead, self-tapping pedicle screw designs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Sciences in Orthopaedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3749 KiB  
Article
“In Vivo” Validation of 3D-Printed Innovative Surgical Template for Lumbar Spinal Arthrodesis
by Francesco Naddeo, Emilio Cataldo, Nicola Narciso, Alessandro Naddeo and Nicola Cappetti
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(17), 5977; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175977 - 28 Aug 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2281
Abstract
The most common type of spine instrumentation is the pedicle screw fixation. The recent literature shows how customized drilling templates help surgeons to perform the surgery better. This work aims to validate the design of a customized template for inserting lumbar pedicle screw [...] Read more.
The most common type of spine instrumentation is the pedicle screw fixation. The recent literature shows how customized drilling templates help surgeons to perform the surgery better. This work aims to validate the design of a customized template for inserting lumbar pedicle screw via a procedure based on rapid prototyping and reverse engineering techniques and to show the benefits. The novelties of this template are its low-invasive sizes, its design based on a patented algorithm, which calculates the sizes of the screws and the optimal insertion direction, the engage/disengage system, and the adaptability to every kind of surgeon’s kit. Accuracy of pedicle screw location, surgery duration, and X-ray exposition have been used to evaluate the performances of the template. Mono-centric in vivo trial was performed. Twenty patients (8 women and 12 men) were enrolled randomly corresponding to sixty vertebrae treated with spinal arthrodesis (30 with and 30 without templates). Accuracy of the screw positioning and reduction in both surgery duration and patients’ exposure to X-rays achieved excellent results because the time spent on the insertion of pedicle screws via the surgical template was cut down by about 63%, while the number of X-ray shots was reduced by about 92%. The proposed template performed better than the standard approach and could be helpful both for skilled and novice surgeons. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Medical Devices)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3021 KiB  
Article
State Recognition of Bone Drilling Based on Acoustic Emission in Pedicle Screw Operation
by Fengqing Guan, Yu Sun, Xiaozhi Qi, Ying Hu, Gang Yu and Jianwei Zhang
Sensors 2018, 18(5), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051484 - 9 May 2018
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 5425
Abstract
Pedicle drilling is an important step in pedicle screw fixation and the most significant challenge in this operation is how to determine a key point in the transition region between cancellous and inner cortical bone. The purpose of this paper is to find [...] Read more.
Pedicle drilling is an important step in pedicle screw fixation and the most significant challenge in this operation is how to determine a key point in the transition region between cancellous and inner cortical bone. The purpose of this paper is to find a method to achieve the recognition for the key point. After acquiring acoustic emission (AE) signals during the drilling process, this paper proposed a novel frequency distribution-based algorithm (FDB) to analyze the AE signals in the frequency domain after certain processes. Then we select a specific frequency domain of the signal for standard operations and choose a fitting function to fit the obtained sequence. Characters of the fitting function are extracted as outputs for identification of different bone layers. The results, which are obtained by detecting force signal and direct measurement, are given in the paper. Compared with the results above, the results obtained by AE signals are distinguishable for different bone layers and are more accurate and precise. The results of the algorithm are trained and identified by a neural network and the recognition rate reaches 84.2%. The proposed method is proved to be efficient and can be used for bone layer identification in pedicle screw fixation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 8106 KiB  
Technical Note
Thoracic, Lumbar, and Sacral Pedicle Screw Placement Using Stryker-Ziehm Virtual Screw Technology and Navigated Stryker Cordless Driver 3: Technical Note
by Praveen Satarasinghe, Kojo D. Hamilton, Michael J. Tarver, Robert J. Buchanan and Michael T. Koltz
J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7(4), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7040084 - 17 Apr 2018
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 6073
Abstract
Object. Utilization of pedicle screws (PS) for spine stabilization is common in spinal surgery. With reliance on visual inspection of anatomical landmarks prior to screw placement, the free-hand technique requires a high level of surgeon skill and precision. Three-dimensional (3D), computer-assisted virtual neuronavigation [...] Read more.
Object. Utilization of pedicle screws (PS) for spine stabilization is common in spinal surgery. With reliance on visual inspection of anatomical landmarks prior to screw placement, the free-hand technique requires a high level of surgeon skill and precision. Three-dimensional (3D), computer-assisted virtual neuronavigation improves the precision of PS placement and minimization steps. Methods. Twenty-three patients with degenerative, traumatic, or neoplastic pathologies received treatment via a novel three-step PS technique that utilizes a navigated power driver in combination with virtual screw technology. (1) Following visualization of neuroanatomy using intraoperative CT, a navigated 3-mm match stick drill bit was inserted at an anatomical entry point with a screen projection showing a virtual screw. (2) A Navigated Stryker Cordless Driver with an appropriate tap was used to access the vertebral body through a pedicle with a screen projection again showing a virtual screw. (3) A Navigated Stryker Cordless Driver with an actual screw was used with a screen projection showing the same virtual screw. One hundred and forty-four consecutive screws were inserted using this three-step, navigated driver, virtual screw technique. Results. Only 1 screw needed intraoperative revision after insertion using the three-step, navigated driver, virtual PS technique. This amounts to a 0.69% revision rate. One hundred percent of patients had intraoperative CT reconstructed images taken to confirm hardware placement. Conclusions. Pedicle screw placement utilizing the Stryker-Ziehm neuronavigation virtual screw technology with a three step, navigated power drill technique is safe and effective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nuclear Medicine & Radiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop