Search Results (117)

Background and Objectives: Postoperative pancreatic fistula and post-hepatectomy liver failure remain significant complications after HPB surgery; however, superficial surgical site infection (SSI) is the most frequent wound-related complication. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been proposed to reduce superficial contamination, yet no liver-focused quantitative synthesis exists. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic ciNPWT after hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 30 April 2025. Randomized and comparative observational studies that compared ciNPWT with conventional dressings after elective liver transplantation, hepatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, and liver resections were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB-2/ROBINS-I). A random-effects Mantel–Haenszel model generated pooled risk ratios (RRs) for superficial SSI; secondary outcomes were reported descriptively. Results: Twelve studies (seven RCTs, five cohorts) encompassing 15,212 patients (3561 ciNPWT; 11,651 control) met the inclusion criteria. Device application lasted three to seven days in all trials. The pooled analysis demonstrated a 29% relative reduction in superficial SSI with ciNPWT (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.63–0.79; p < 0.001) with negligible heterogeneity (I² 0%). Absolute risk reduction ranged from 0% to 13%, correlating positively with the baseline control-group SSI rate. Deep/organ-space SSI (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79–1.09) and 90-day mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.28) were unaffected. Seven studies documented a 1- to 3-day shorter median length of stay; only two reached statistical significance. Device-related adverse events were rare (one seroma, no skin necrosis). Conclusions: Prophylactic ciNPWT safely reduces superficial SSI after high-risk HPB surgery, with the greatest absolute benefit when baseline SSI risk exceeds ≈10%. Its influence on deep infection and mortality is negligible. Full article

Background: While there is an abundance of comparative studies on open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) available in the literature, direct comparisons between RDP and hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (HALDP) are limited. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of RDPs in comparison to HALDPs in the treatment of pancreatic lesions. Methods: This study reviewed 97 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at Carmel Medical Center between 2008 and 2024. After excluding 40 patients (24 open and 16 pure laparoscopic resections), the final cohort comprised 57 patients: 20 RDPs and 37 HALDPs. The primary outcomes included peri-operative parameters, while secondary outcomes encompassed 90-day morbidity and mortality. Results: RDPs led to significantly longer operative times (3.9 vs. 2.5 h, p < 0.001) but resulted in shorter hospital stays (4.7 vs. 5.8 days, p = 0.02) and a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (11 vs. 5.4, p = 0.01). While clinically significant pancreatic fistula rates were numerically higher in the RDP group (35% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.18), this difference was not statistically significant. Overall, complication rates were comparable (55% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.39). Severe morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ IIIa) was absent in the RDP group compared to 8% in the HALDP group (p = 0.04). No 90-day mortality was observed in either group. Conclusions: This study indicates that although RDP involves longer operative times, it may provide certain advantages for patients, such as shorter hospital stays, better lymph node retrieval, and a notable decrease in postoperative morbidity when compared to HALDP. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results and to determine the most effective surgical approach for distal pancreatectomy. Full article

The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is continuing to rise globally, while overall survival continues to be poor. Margin-negative (R0) surgical resection is essential to improve patient outcomes. With increasing understanding of the importance of anatomy and biology to establishing the resectability of PDAC, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has emerged as an important strategy to achieve an R0 resection, particularly for those with borderline resectable (BR-PDAC) and locally advanced disease (LA-PDAC). However, despite the multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in recent years, the optimum regime has yet to be fully established. The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) remains controversial, possibly allowing for improved local disease control at a potential cost of interrupting systemic treatment. The emergence of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), in place of conventional radiation therapy, improves patient tolerance of NAT and may improve local tumour control for patients with PDAC during limited fractions, minimising systemic therapy interruption. A particular niche for SABR may be as part of NAT for LA-PDAC, potentially converting a minority of patients with favourable biology to allow for resection. While pancreaticoduodenectomy can be technically challenging following NAT, there is no difference in the rate of major morbidity or mortality post operatively. Indeed, post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates may be lower following NAT. Overall, however, evidence for SABR in a neoadjuvant setting for BR- and LA-PDAC remains sparse. Full article

Background: In recent years, the use of minimally invasive approaches in pancreatic surgery has progressively increased. One of the key components of pancreaticoduodenectomy is the creation of a pancreato-enteric anastomosis, due to the high risk of postoperative complications, particularly the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Among the types of anastomoses, the Blumgart technique has gained popularity due to its ease of reproducibility. Methods: In this guide, we summarize and systematize step by step how to perform a feasible, reproductible and safe robotic Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy, providing some instructions for its successful completion. Results: Despite the heterogeneity of the published data, duct-to-mucosa Blumgart anastomosis seems to be superior in terms of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula rates compared with other types of pancreato-enteric anastomosis. The advantages of robotic surgery, such as improved precision, greater control, and enhanced visualization, make robotic Blumgart anastomosis a safe, practical, and reproducible technique in the context of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Conclusions: Robotic Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy is a safe and feasible technique for pancreato-enteric anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy when surgical technique is systematized step by step. Full article

Background and Objectives: Various publications have compared outcomes among open (OPDs), laparoscopic (LPDs), and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPDs); however, the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains limited. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and analyze the outcomes between these approaches from randomized controlled trials. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic literature search across PubMed/MedLine, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar to identify relevant RCTs. The systematic review was conducted using the reporting items for systematic reviews and network meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA-NMA) and registered in Prospero (CRD420251024475). For statistical analysis R software (version 4.3.2) was used. Results: Eight RCTs involving 1416 patients (706 OPDs, 600 LPDs, 110 RPDs) were included. LPD had a significantly longer operative time than OPD, while RPD showed no significant difference compared to OPD. Blood loss was reduced in both minimally invasive approaches. LPD showed a higher R0 resection rate and lower pancreatic fistula rate, whereas RPD had the lowest mortality. No significant differences were observed in major complications, reoperation, or readmission. LPD shortened hospital stay; RPD showed no difference. Conclusions: Although open pancreaticoduodenectomy remains a well-established standard, both laparoscopic and robotic approaches offer safe alternatives with distinct advantages. LPD is associated with shorter hospital stay and lower pancreatic fistula rates, whereas RPD demonstrates the lowest mortality. The lack of direct randomized comparisons between LPD and RPD highlights the need for further head-to-head trials. Full article

Background. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains one of the most relevant complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), significantly impacting short-term outcomes and delaying adjuvant therapies. Current predictive models offer limited accuracy, often failing to incorporate early postoperative data. This retrospective study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict the absence and severity of POPF using clinical, surgical, and early postoperative variables. Methods. Data from 216 patients undergoing PD were analyzed. A total of twenty-four machine learning (ML) algorithms were systematically evaluated using the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) and AUC-ROC metrics. Among these, the GradientBoostingClassifier consistently outperformed all other models, demonstrating the best predictive performance, particularly in identifying patients at low risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) during the early postoperative period. To enhance transparency and interpretability, a SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was applied, highlighting the key role of early postoperative biomarkers in the model predictions. Results. The performance of the GradientBoostingClassifier was also directly compared to that of a traditional logistic regression model, confirming the superior predictive performance over conventional approaches. This study demonstrates that ML can effectively stratify POPF risk, potentially supporting early drain removal and optimizing postoperative management. Conclusions. While the model showed promising performance in a single-center cohort, external validation across different surgical settings will be essential to confirm its generalizability and clinical utility. The integration of ML into clinical workflows may represent a step forward in delivering personalized and dynamic care after pancreatic surgery. Full article

Radiological assessment following pancreaticoduodenectomy is critical for the prompt diagnosis and management of postoperative complications, significantly influencing patient outcomes. Pancreaticoduodenectomy, or the Whipple procedure, is the standard surgical intervention for pancreatic and periampullary malignancies, but it involves notable risks, especially from complications like fistulas, bleeding, or leakage. Cross-sectional imaging, particularly contrast-enhanced computed tomography, serves as the primary diagnostic tool due to its rapid acquisition, high resolution, and effective delineation of postoperative anatomy and complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (with cholangiopancreatography and hepatobiliary contrast agents) complements CT by providing superior contrast resolution for specific complications, notably in the biliary system and pancreatic duct. This narrative review discusses various imaging techniques and their applications, highlighting characteristic radiological features of common postoperative complications. It underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, emphasizing close collaboration between radiologists and surgeons to optimize surgical decision-making and improve patient management post-pancreatic surgery. Full article

Background: Robot-assisted pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPPPD) has been increasingly adopted, leveraging the advantages of robotic technology. RPPPD is rarely performed using the da Vinci SP system. In this study, we address the technical issues encountered during the early experiences with robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPPPD) using the da SP Vinci system and propose effective solutions. Method: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of seven patients who underwent RPPPD using the da Vinci SP system. The primary technical challenges included limited instrument maneuverability, difficulty in maintaining clear surgical views, and the need for precise anastomosis. Results: Postoperatively, all patients were discharged without significant complications, with no clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas observed. Only minimal scarring was observed postoperatively. In addition, our results showed that operative time gradually decreased. The operation time was significantly shorter in the RPPPD using the SP system group compared to the RPPPD using the multiport system group. Conclusions: Implementing enhanced preoperative planning, advanced intraoperative imaging, and specialized robotic tools can significantly improve surgical efficiency and patient outcomes. Full article

Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a frequent emergency department (ED) presentation with rare but life-threatening causes, including arterio-enteric fistulas (AEF), which account for less than 1% of GIB cases. Ilio-enteric fistulas are even more rare but have similar morbidity and mortality. Methods: This case report describes a 51-year-old male with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, and pancreas–kidney transplantation who presented to the ED with a massive hemorrhage from an ilio-enteric fistula. Despite initial stability, the patient became hypotensive and deteriorated to pulseless electrical activity (PEA) arrest. Despite multiple arrests, he survived and was discharged to a rehabilitation facility. Results: AEFs, particularly iliac-enteric fistulas, are diagnostically challenging and often present with nonspecific symptoms. Diagnostic imaging, especially CT angiography, is crucial, although initial non-contrast CT may miss the diagnosis. Early consultation with vascular surgery is essential for managing these patients. Conclusions: This case underscores the need to consider AEF in the differential diagnosis of GIB, particularly in post-transplant patients, and highlights the importance of prompt intervention. Full article

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive neoplasm with a complex carcinogenesis process that must be understood through the interactions between tumor cells and tumor microenvironment cells. Methods: This study was retrospective with a chronological extension period of 16 years and included 56 cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study identified, quantified, and correlated the cells of the tumor immune microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with major prognostic factors as well as overall survival, using an extensive panel of immunohistochemical markers. Results: Three tumor immunotypes were identified: subtype A (hot immunotype), subtype B (intermediate immunotype), and subtype C (cold immunotype). Patients with immunotype C exhibit considerably higher rates of both pancreatic fistulas and acute pancreatitis. Immunotypes B and C significantly increased the risk of this complication by factors of 3.68 (p = 0.002) and 3.94 (p = 0.001), respectively. The estimated probabilities of fistula formation for each immunotype are as follows: 2.5% for immunotype A, 25% for immunotype B, and 28% for immunotype C. There was a statistically significant difference in median survival times according to tumor immunotype (p < 0.001). Specifically, patients with immunotype C tumors had a median survival time of only 120.5 days, compared to 553.5 days for those with immunotype A and 331.5 for immunotype B tumors. Conclusions: The identification of the immunotype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma can be a predictive factor for the occurrence of complications such as pancreatic fistula as well as for overall survival. Full article

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a significant complication following pancreatic surgery, considerably influenced by the texture of the pancreatic tissue. This study aims to explore the potential of Penicillin G (PG) in reducing the severity of POPF in a porcine surgical model. Study Design: After performing distal pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), pigs were administered either normal saline or varying concentrations of PG (0.75, 1.5, and 3.0 mM) at the PJ site. The study estimated POPF by measuring pancreatic hardness, tensile force, fibrosis, and amylase levels in Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain samples. Results: Intraparenchymal PG injection significantly increased pancreatic hardness and tensile force (p < 0.05) while upregulating profibrotic markers like MMP2 and TGF-β1, indicating enhanced fibrosis (p < 0.05). Importantly, these profibrotic changes reverted to baseline levels by POD 14, suggesting reversible fibrosis without lasting consequences. The 0.75 PG and 1.5 PG groups exhibited significantly lower JP amylase levels than the control group on both POD 3 and POD 4 (p < 0.05). Notably, the 0.75 PG group also demonstrated the highest survival rate compared to the 1.5 PG and NS groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The intrapancreatic PG injection could effectively reduce the severity of POPF by promoting wound healing through intensified fibrosis around the PJ site. Full article

Background and Objectives: Preoperative biliary stenting (PBS) is commonly used to manage obstructive jaundice in patients undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). However, the impact of PBS on intestinal barrier function and perioperative complications remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the effect of PBS on intestinal dysfunction and surgical outcomes, focusing on the influence of the stent duration. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 235 patients undergoing PPPD for resectable pancreatic neoplasms at Timișoara Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital (2016–2024) were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those with PBS (n = 98) and without PBS (n = 137). Intestinal barrier function was assessed pre- and postoperatively using biomarkers such as zonulin, fecal calprotectin, and serum lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Perioperative outcomes, including pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying (DGE), infections, and hospital stay, were compared. Additionally, outcomes were stratified based on stent duration (2–3 weeks vs. 3–4 weeks). Results: PBS was associated with significantly higher levels of zonulin, fecal calprotectin, and serum LPS postoperatively, indicating compromised intestinal barrier function. The stented group had a higher incidence of pancreatic fistulas (Grade B/C: 27.5% vs. 13.1%, p < 0.01), DGE (25.5% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.008), postoperative infections (34.7% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.002), and prolonged hospital stay (16.9 ± 4.2 days vs. 14.5 ± 3.7 days, p = 0.019). Prolonged stenting (3–4 weeks) was associated with worse outcomes compared to shorter stenting durations (2–3 weeks), including increased rates of infections, sepsis, and ICU stay (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusions: Preoperative biliary stenting is associated with increased intestinal barrier dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and higher rates of perioperative complications following PPPD. Prolonged stenting durations (>3 weeks) further exacerbate these risks. Limiting the PBS duration to 2–3 weeks, alongside optimized perioperative management, may help reduce postoperative morbidity and improve surgical outcomes. Full article

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistulae (POPFs) are a significant cause of morbidity following left pancreatectomy. We hypothesized that incorporating serosal patching with the application of a synthetic sealant, a modified cyanoacrylate (Glubran^®2), to the pancreatic stump, would decrease the incidence rate of clinically significant POPFs. Methods: This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted left pancreatectomy. The primary outcome was clinically significant POPFs within 90 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included the incidence rate of POPFs (all the grades), 90-day morbidity, and 90-day mortality. Results: We compared outcomes between Glubran^®2 sealant with serosal patching (GSP, n = 6) and Glubran^®2 sealant without serosal patching (GNSP, n = 12) groups. The GSP group had significantly lower incidence rates of clinically significant POPFs (grades B/C) (p = 0.034) and overall POPFs (all the grades) (p = 0.046). No significant differences in 90-day postoperative morbidity were observed between the two groups (p = 0.56), and no 90-day mortality occurred in either group. Conclusions: Incorporating serosal patching along with Glubran^®2 sealant in the management of the pancreatic stump during left pancreatectomy demonstrates promising results in reducing the incidence rate of clinically significant POPFs. This finding highlights the need for further research with larger sample sizes in order to confirm the observed outcomes and explore the long-term implications for postoperative complications and recovery in patients undergoing this procedure during pancreatic surgery. Full article

Background: Neuroendocrine tumors are tumors that can develop in any organ but show a predilection for the pancreas. These can be secreting or non-secreting tumors, or they can be well differentiated or poorly differentiated, or neuroendocrine carcinomas. Surgical treatment is the only treatment with curative intent, but postoperatively, it shows an increased incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistulas. Methods: We carried out a retrospective study which included 26 patients with neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas, for whom we performed cephalic duodenopancreatectomies, distal pancreatic resections or enucleation. Results: In our study group, the incidence of pancreatic fistulas was 28%, and a series of risk factors such as the type of surgery (duodenopancreatectomy and enucleation were associated with the highest incidence of POPF), histological type (pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas were associated with lowest incidence of POPF), obesity (the incidence of POPF was double in the obese group), functioning tumors (with p = 0.032 and AUC = 746) and dynamic hemoglobin value (AUC = 705 shows a good predicting power, with a cutoff value = 1.8 drop hemoglobin) were indicated. Conclusions: Neuroendocrine tumors show a predisposition for the occurrence of postoperative complications, especially postoperative pancreatic fistulas. There are multiple risk factors that interact in the production of postoperative complications. Full article

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a minimally invasive approach for the surgical treatment of neoplasms in the distal pancreas. This study aimed to compare this approach to the open procedure. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 400 pancreatectomies was performed. The laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy group (LDP) was compared to the open distal pancreatectomy group (ODP). A propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was performed. From 2016 to 2023, 108 distal pancreatectomies were carried out, 19 (17.6%) laparoscopically and 89 (82.4%) openly. The conversion rate was 13.6%. The severe morbidity rates were 28.1% in the ODP group, 47.4% in the LDP group, and 15.8% in the ODP-PSM group. The difference between the latter two was statistically significant (p = 0.034) due to the high rate of Clavien–Dindo grade 3a complications (42.1% versus 10.5%, p = 0.042) in the LDP group. The 90-day mortality rates were 3.3% in the ODP group and 5.3% in the other two groups. The LDP group had a shorter duration of intravenous narcotic analgesia (5 versus 7 days, p = 0.041). There was no difference in the R0 resection or postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. Our attention should be drawn to preventing postoperative complications because the oncological outcomes are already comparable with those of the open procedure, and postoperative pain management is promising. Full article