Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (13,319)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = overall cancer

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 991 KiB  
Systematic Review
Timing Matters: A Systematic Review of Early Versus Delayed Palliative Care in Advanced Cancer
by Ioana Creangă-Murariu, Eliza-Maria Froicu, Dragos Viorel Scripcariu, Gema Bacaoanu, Mihaela Poroch, Mihaela Moscalu, Claudia Cristina Tarniceriu, Teodora Alexa-Stratulat and Vladimir Poroch
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2598; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152598 (registering DOI) - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
(1) Background: Early palliative care (EPC) is increasingly recognized as a key component of comprehensive cancer management, with evidence supporting improvements in quality of life, symptom control, and clinical outcomes in advanced malignancies. (2) Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Early palliative care (EPC) is increasingly recognized as a key component of comprehensive cancer management, with evidence supporting improvements in quality of life, symptom control, and clinical outcomes in advanced malignancies. (2) Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024623219). We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating EPC in adults with advanced, incurable, or metastatic cancer. Eligible studies reported on at least one of the following: overall quality of life, symptom burden, or disease progression indicators. (3) Results: Forty-one RCTs met inclusion criteria. Despite heterogeneity in timing and structure, EPC consistently improved quality of life and reduced symptom burden in advanced cancer patients, with 32 trials demonstrating significant clinical benefit. Some studies also reported slowed disease progression. However, several RCTs showed no significant effects, highlighting variation in outcomes, possible subgroup effects, and challenges in implementation. Definitions and delivery of EPC varied widely, particularly in timing, frequency, and integration into oncology care. (4) Conclusions: These findings support the integration of EPC alongside disease-directed treatments, challenging the misconception that palliative care is only appropriate at the end of life and reinforcing its role early in the cancer care continuum. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrating Palliative Care in Oncology)
27 pages, 1680 KiB  
Review
Microtubule-Targeting Agents: Advances in Tubulin Binding and Small Molecule Therapy for Gliomas and Neurodegenerative Diseases
by Maya Ezzo and Sandrine Etienne-Manneville
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7652; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157652 (registering DOI) - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Microtubules play a key role in cell division and cell migration. Thus, microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs) are pivotal in cancer therapy due to their ability to disrupt cell division microtubule dynamics. Traditionally divided into stabilizers and destabilizers, MTAs are increasingly being repurposed for central [...] Read more.
Microtubules play a key role in cell division and cell migration. Thus, microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs) are pivotal in cancer therapy due to their ability to disrupt cell division microtubule dynamics. Traditionally divided into stabilizers and destabilizers, MTAs are increasingly being repurposed for central nervous system (CNS) applications, including brain malignancies such as gliomas and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Microtubule-stabilizing agents, such as taxanes and epothilones, promote microtubule assembly and have shown efficacy in both tumour suppression and neuronal repair, though their CNS use is hindered by blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability and neurotoxicity. Destabilizing agents, including colchicine-site and vinca domain binders, offer potent anticancer effects but pose greater risks for neuronal toxicity. This review highlights the mapping of nine distinct tubulin binding pockets—including classical (taxane, vinca, colchicine) and emerging (tumabulin, pironetin) sites—that offer new pharmacological entry points. We summarize the recent advances in structural biology and drug design, enabling MTAs to move beyond anti-mitotic roles, unlocking applications in both cancer and neurodegeneration for next-generation MTAs with enhanced specificity and BBB penetration. We further discuss the therapeutic potential of combination strategies, including MTAs with radiation, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, or antibody–drug conjugates, that show synergistic effects in glioblastoma models. Furthermore, innovative delivery systems like nanoparticles and liposomes are enhancing CNS drug delivery. Overall, MTAs continue to evolve as multifunctional tools with expanding applications across oncology and neurology, with future therapies focusing on optimizing efficacy, reducing toxicity, and overcoming therapeutic resistance in brain-related diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Drugs Regulating Cytoskeletons in Human Health and Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 614 KiB  
Article
Multi-Institutional Comparison of Ablative 5-Fraction Magnetic Resonance-Guided Online Adaptive Versus 15/25-Fraction Computed Tomography-Guided Moderately Hypofractionated Offline Adapted Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
by Michael D. Chuong, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Robert A. Herrera, Melissa Zinovoy, Kathryn E. Mittauer, Muni Rubens, Adeel Kaiser, Paul B. Romesser, Nema Bassiri-Gharb, Abraham J. Wu, John J. Cuaron, Alonso N. Gutierrez, Carla Hajj, Antonio Ucar, Fernando DeZarraga, Santiago Aparo, Christopher H. Crane and Marsha Reyngold
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2596; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152596 - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) or computed tomography (CT)-guided moderately hypofractionated ablative radiation therapy (HART) can achieve favorable outcomes although have not previously been compared. Methods: We performed [...] Read more.
Background: Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) or computed tomography (CT)-guided moderately hypofractionated ablative radiation therapy (HART) can achieve favorable outcomes although have not previously been compared. Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective analysis of SMART (50 Gy/5 fractions) vs. HART (75 Gy/25 fractions or 67.5 Gy/15 fractions with concurrent capecitabine) for LAPC. Gray’s test and Cox proportional regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 211 patients (SMART, n = 91; HART, n = 120) were evaluated, and none had surgery. Median follow-up after SMART and HART was 27.0 and 40.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0002). SMART achieved higher gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage and greater hotspots. Two-year LF after SMART and HART was 6.5% and 32.9% (p < 0.001), while two-year OS was 31.0% vs. 35.3% (p = 0.056), respectively. LF was associated with SMART vs. HART (HR 5.389, 95% CI: 1.298–21.975; p = 0.021) and induction mFOLFIRINOX vs. non-mFOLFIRINOX (HR 2.067, 95% CI 1.038–4.052; p = 0.047), while OS was associated with CA19-9 decrease > 40% (HR 0.725, 95% CI 0.515–0.996; p = 0.046) and GTV V120% (HR 1.022, 95% CI 1.006–1.037; p = 0.015). Acute grade > 3 toxicity was similar (3.3% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.390), while late grade > 3 toxicity was less common after SMART (2.2% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.037). Conclusions: Ablative SMART and HART both achieve favorable oncologic outcomes for LAPC with minimal toxicity. We did not observe an OS difference, although technical advantages of SMART might improve target coverage and reduce LF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 958 KiB  
Article
Impact of Surgical Margin Control in Index Tumors on Prognosis After Radical Prostatectomy: A Focus on Zonal Origin
by Jun Akatsuka, Yoshihiko Ogata, Kotaro Obayashi, Mami Takadate, Shunsuke Ikuma, Hiroya Hasegawa, Hikaru Mikami, Hayato Takeda, Yuki Endo, Takayuki Takahashi, Kaori Ono, Yuka Toyama, Yoichiro Yamamoto, Go Kimura and Yukihiro Kondo
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(8), 445; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080445 - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
We investigated the clinical significance of positive surgical margins (PSMs) in index tumors following radical prostatectomy (RP), with particular attention to the tumor’s zonal origin. Among 1148 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent RPs, 973 were included after excluding those who received [...] Read more.
We investigated the clinical significance of positive surgical margins (PSMs) in index tumors following radical prostatectomy (RP), with particular attention to the tumor’s zonal origin. Among 1148 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent RPs, 973 were included after excluding those who received perioperative therapy or had incomplete data. Index tumors were categorized by zonal origin: transition zone, peripheral zone, or central zone (CZ). Overall, PSMs were observed in 26.4% of index tumors. Although CZ index tumors were relatively uncommon (6.5%), they exhibited the highest PSM rate (42.9%) and showed the most aggressive pathological features. The 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with PSMs in index tumors than in those with negative surgical margins (45.6% vs. 86.8%, p < 0.0001). Notably, patients with PSMs in CZ index tumors had the worst outcomes, with a 5-year BCR-free survival rate of 22.0%. Multivariate analysis identified PSMs in index tumors as an independent predictor of BCR (HR: 3.4; 95% CI: 2.5–4.5), with a similar trend observed in early recurrence. These findings highlight the prognostic significance of PSMs in index tumors during RP, especially in CZ tumors, and emphasize the importance of securing local control in these cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2328 KiB  
Article
Novel Insights into T-Cell Exhaustion and Cancer Biomarkers in PDAC Using ScRNA-Seq
by Muhammad Usman Saleem, Hammad Ali Sajid, Muhammad Waqar Arshad, Alejandro Omar Rivera Torres, Muhammad Imran Shabbir and Sunil Kumar Rai
Biology 2025, 14(8), 1015; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14081015 - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
One of the aggressive and lethal cancers, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by poor prognosis and resistance to conventional treatments. Moreover, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) plays a crucial role in the progression and therapeutic resistance of PDAC. It is associated with [...] Read more.
One of the aggressive and lethal cancers, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by poor prognosis and resistance to conventional treatments. Moreover, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) plays a crucial role in the progression and therapeutic resistance of PDAC. It is associated with T-cell exhaustion, leading to the progressive loss of T-cell functions with an impaired ability to kill tumor cells. Therefore, this study employed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of a publicly available human PDAC dataset, with cells isolated from the primary tumor and adjacent normal tissues, identifying upregulated genes of T-cells and cancer cells in two groups (“cancer cells_vs_all-PDAC” and “cancer-PDAC_vs_all-normal”). Common and unique markers of cancer cells from both groups were identified. The Reactome pathways of cancer and T-cells were selected, while the genes implicated in those pathways were used to perform PPI analysis, revealing the hub genes of cancer and T-cells. The gene expression validation of cancer and T-cells hub-genes was performed using GEPIA2 and TISCH2, while the overall survival analysis of cancer cells hub-genes was performed using GEPIA2. Conclusively, this study unraveled 16 novel markers of cancer and T-cells, providing the groundwork for future research into the immune landscape of PDAC, particularly T-cell exhaustion. However, further clinical studies are needed to validate these novel markers as potential therapeutic targets in PDAC patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1954 KiB  
Article
Personalizing Patient Education for Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Multidisciplinary Care with Integration of Novel Digital Tools
by Nicole Nardella, Matt Adams, Adrianna Oraiqat, Brian D. Gonzalez, Corinne Thomas, Sarah Goodchild, Sonia Adamson, Maria Sandoval, Jessica Frakes, Russell F. Palm, Carrie Stricker, Joe Herman, Pamela Hodul, Sarah Krüg and Sarah Hoffe
Healthcare 2025, 13(15), 1929; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151929 - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a diagnosis with a poor prognosis which can be associated with significant distress and may hinder a patient’s ability to understand treatment details. Educating patients based on their learning preferences (LPs) and emotions may allow for personalized, enhanced [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a diagnosis with a poor prognosis which can be associated with significant distress and may hinder a patient’s ability to understand treatment details. Educating patients based on their learning preferences (LPs) and emotions may allow for personalized, enhanced care. Methods: This prospective project enrolled patients with non-metastatic PC. Phase 1 utilized the Learning Preference Barometer (LPB) and Emotional Journey Barometer (EJB), which are digital instruments co-designed by CANCER101 (C101) and the Health Collaboratory, to assess patient LPs and emotional states. Phase 2 provided information prescriptions aligned with LPs through C101’s Prescription to Learn® (P2L) platform. Collected data included demographics, treatment, LPs (auditory, kinesthetic, linguistic, visual), patient engagement with P2L, and patient emotional states with qualitative verbal validation. Descriptive variables were used to report outcomes. Results: Primary LPs in the 47 participating patients were as follows: linguistic 45%, visual 34%, auditory 11%, and kinesthetic 9%, with secondary preferences in the majority (53%). Those patients (66%) who accessed P2L had linguistic and visual preferences; the majority accessed 1- 2 resources out of the 25 provided. Resources accessed aligned to 88% of patient LPs. The majority of patients (60%) initiated treatment prior to initial EJB, and 40% were treatment naive. Common baseline emotions were optimistic (47% vs. 36%, respectively), satisfied (11% vs. 25%), acceptance (11% vs. 11%), and overwhelmed (5% vs. 11%). Conclusions: Assessing LPs and emotional state allows for personalized patient education and clinical encounters for PC patients. Future work includes examining the effects of personalized approaches on patient satisfaction, decision-making, health outcomes, and the overall patient–clinician relationship. Full article
Show Figures

Figure A1

16 pages, 752 KiB  
Systematic Review
Balancing Accuracy, Safety, and Cost in Mediastinal Diagnostics: A Systematic Review of EBUS and Mediastinoscopy in NSCLC
by Serban Radu Matache, Ana Adelina Afetelor, Ancuta Mihaela Voinea, George Codrut Cosoveanu, Silviu-Mihail Dumitru, Mihai Alexe, Mihnea Orghidan, Alina Maria Smaranda, Vlad Cristian Dobrea, Alexandru Șerbănoiu, Beatrice Mahler and Cornel Florentin Savu
Healthcare 2025, 13(15), 1924; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151924 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Mediastinal staging plays a critical role in guiding treatment decisions for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While mediastinoscopy has been the gold standard for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative [...] Read more.
Background: Mediastinal staging plays a critical role in guiding treatment decisions for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While mediastinoscopy has been the gold standard for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative with comparable diagnostic accuracy. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance, safety, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility of EBUS-TBNA versus mediastinoscopy for mediastinal staging. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, including searches in Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies published from 2010 onwards. A total of 1542 studies were identified, and after removing duplicates and applying eligibility criteria, 100 studies were included for detailed analysis. The extracted data focused on sensitivity, specificity, complications, economic impact, and patient outcomes. Results: EBUS-TBNA demonstrated high sensitivity (85–94%) and specificity (~100%), making it an effective first-line modality for NSCLC staging. Mediastinoscopy remained highly specific (~100%) but exhibited slightly lower sensitivity (86–90%). EBUS-TBNA had a lower complication rate (~2%) and was more cost-effective, while mediastinoscopy provided larger biopsy samples, essential for molecular and histological analyses. The need for general anaesthesia, longer hospital stays, and increased procedural costs make mediastinoscopy less favourable as an initial approach. Combining both techniques in select cases enhanced overall staging accuracy, reducing false negatives and improving diagnostic confidence. Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA has become the preferred first-line mediastinal staging method due to its minimally invasive approach, high diagnostic accuracy, and lower cost. However, mediastinoscopy remains crucial in cases requiring posterior mediastinal node assessment or larger tissue samples. The integration of both techniques in a stepwise diagnostic strategy offers the highest accuracy while minimizing risks and costs. Given the lower hospitalization rates and economic benefits associated with EBUS-TBNA, its widespread adoption may contribute to more efficient resource utilization in healthcare systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 340 KiB  
Article
FLOT Versus CROSS—What Is the Optimal Therapeutic Approach for Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Esophagogastric Junction?
by Martin Leu, Hannes Mahler, Johanna Reinecke, Ute Margarethe König, Leif Hendrik Dröge, Manuel Guhlich, Benjamin Steuber, Marian Grade, Michael Ghadimi, Volker Ellenrieder, Stefan Rieken and Alexander Otto König
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2587; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152587 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or cause less toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with locally advanced EAC or AEGJ treated at our tertiary cancer center between January 2015 and March 2023. Patients received either perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (n = 36) or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy following the CROSS protocol (n = 40), followed by surgical resection and standardized follow-up. We compared survival outcomes, toxicity profiles, treatment compliance, and surgical results between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between FLOT and CROSS treatments in five-year loco-regional controls (LRC: 61.5% vs. 68.6%; p = 0.81), progression-free survival (PFS: 33.9% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.82), overall survival (OS: 60.2% vs. 63.4%; p = 0.91), or distant controls (DC: 42.1% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.39). High-grade hematologic toxicities did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Treatment compliance was lower in the FLOT group, with 50% (18/36) not completing all the planned chemotherapy cycles, compared to 17.5% (7/40) in the CROSS group. All the patients in the CROSS group received the full radiotherapy dose. Surgical outcomes and post-surgical tumor status were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Although perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has recently become a standard of care for locally advanced EAC and AEGJ, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy per the CROSS protocol remains a well-tolerated alternative. In appropriately selected patients, both approaches yield comparable oncological outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Treatments of Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 693 KiB  
Article
Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study
by Eishin Kurihara, Satoru Kakizaki, Masashi Ijima, Takeshi Hatanaka, Norio Kubo, Yuhei Suzuki, Hidetoshi Yasuoka, Takashi Hoshino, Atsushi Naganuma, Noriyuki Tani, Yuichi Yamazaki and Toshio Uraoka
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1915; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081915 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit of using durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibody, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCD) treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit of using durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) antibody, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GCD) treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of GCD treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer in real-world conditions. Methods: The study subjects were 52 patients with biliary tract cancer who received GCD therapy between January 2023 and May 2024. The observation parameters included the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR), tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results: The cohort included 36 men and 16 women, with a median age of 73.0 years. There were 36 cases of cholangiocarcinoma (distal: 10, perihilar: 19, intrahepatic: 7), 13 cases of gallbladder cancer, and 3 cases of ampullary carcinoma. The stages were locally advanced in 30 cases and metastatic in 22 cases. Biliary drainage was performed in 30 cases. There were 38 cases receiving first-line therapy and 14 cases receiving second-line or later treatments. The median values at the start of GCD therapy were ALB 3.7 g/dL, CRP 0.39 mg/dL, NLR 2.4, PLR 162.5, CEA 4.8 ng/mL, and CA19-9 255.9 U/mL. The mGPS distribution was 0:23 cases, 1:18 cases, and 2:11 cases. The treatment outcomes were ORR 25.0% (CR 2 cases, PR 11 cases), DCR 78.8% (SD 28 cases, PD 10 cases, NE 1 case), median PFS 8.6 months, and median OS 13.9 months. The PLR was suggested to be useful for predicting PFS. A decrease in CEA at six weeks after the start of treatment was a significant predictor of PFS and OS. Gallbladder cancer had a significantly poorer prognosis compared to other cancers. The immune-related adverse events included hypothyroidism in two cases, cholangitis in one case, and colitis in one case. Conclusions: The ORR, DCR, and PFS were comparable to those in the TOPAZ-1 trial. Although limited by its retrospective design and small sample size, this study suggests that GCD therapy is an effective treatment regimen for unresectable biliary tract cancer in real-world clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Anticancer Inhibitors and Targeted Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 486 KiB  
Article
Efficacy and Safety of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Real Clinical Data and Literature Review
by Keiko Yanagihara, Masato Yoshida, Tamami Yamakawa, Sena Kato, Miki Tamura and Koji Nagata
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(8), 441; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080441 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Dose-dense chemotherapy shortens the interval between chemotherapy cycles and has shown improved outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy in 80 breast cancer patients treated at our hospital from 2020 to 2024. The regimen [...] Read more.
Dose-dense chemotherapy shortens the interval between chemotherapy cycles and has shown improved outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy in 80 breast cancer patients treated at our hospital from 2020 to 2024. The regimen included epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel, with pegfilgrastim support. The overall treatment completion rate was 82.5%. Of the 80 patients, 55 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the pathological complete response rate was significantly higher in triple-negative breast cancer (59.1%) compared to that in luminal-type cancer (9.1%). Common adverse events included anemia, liver dysfunction, myalgia, and peripheral neuropathy. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8.8% of patients, with some cases linked to pegfilgrastim body pod use, particularly in individuals with low subcutaneous fat. Notably, two patients developed pneumocystis pneumonia, potentially associated with steroid administration. Despite these toxicities, most were manageable and resolved after treatment. Our findings support the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, while highlighting the importance of individualized supportive care and vigilance regarding hematologic and infectious complications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 2414 KiB  
Review
Melittin-Based Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Perspectives
by Joe Rizkallah, Nicole Charbel, Abdallah Yassine, Amal El Masri, Chris Raffoul, Omar El Sardouk, Malak Ghezzawi, Therese Abou Nasr and Firas Kreidieh
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(8), 1019; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17081019 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Melittin, a cytolytic peptide derived from honeybee venom, has demonstrated potent anticancer activity through mechanisms such as membrane disruption, apoptosis induction, and modulation of key signaling pathways. Melittin exerts its anticancer activity by interacting with key molecular targets, including downregulation of the PI3K/Akt [...] Read more.
Melittin, a cytolytic peptide derived from honeybee venom, has demonstrated potent anticancer activity through mechanisms such as membrane disruption, apoptosis induction, and modulation of key signaling pathways. Melittin exerts its anticancer activity by interacting with key molecular targets, including downregulation of the PI3K/Akt and NF-κB signaling pathways, and by inducing mitochondrial apoptosis through reactive oxygen species generation and cytochrome c release. However, its clinical application is hindered by its systemic and hemolytic toxicity, rapid degradation in plasma, poor pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity, necessitating the development of targeted delivery strategies to enable safe and effective treatment. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems have emerged as a promising strategy for overcoming these challenges, offering improved tumor targeting, reduced off-target effects, and enhanced stability. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms through which melittin exerts its anticancer effects and evaluates the development of various melittin-loaded nanocarriers, including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, dendrimers, micelles, and inorganic systems. It also summarizes the preclinical evidence for melittin nanotherapy across a wide range of cancer types, highlighting both its cytotoxic and immunomodulatory effects. The potential of melittin nanoparticles to overcome multidrug resistance and synergize with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, photothermal therapy, and radiotherapy is discussed. Despite promising in vitro and in vivo findings, its clinical translation remains limited. Key barriers include toxicity, manufacturing scalability, regulatory approval, and the need for more extensive in vivo validation. A key future direction is the application of computational tools, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and artificial-intelligence-based modeling, to streamline development and guide its clinical translation. Addressing these challenges through focused research and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to realizing the full therapeutic potential of melittin-based nanomedicines in oncology. Overall, this review synthesizes the findings from over 100 peer-reviewed studies published between 2008 and 2025, providing an up-to-date assessment of melittin-based nanomedicine strategies across diverse cancer types. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Novel Tumor-Targeting Nanoparticles, 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1517 KiB  
Article
Adverse Pathology After Radical Prostatectomy in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life
by Michael Chaloupka, Alexander Buchner, Marc Kidess, Benedikt Ebner, Yannic Volz, Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Stephan Timo Ledderose, Dirk-André Clevert, Julian Marcon, Philipp Weinhold, Christian G. Stief and Maria Apfelbeck
Diagnostics 2025, 15(15), 1969; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15151969 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background and Objective: Adverse pathology to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (upgrading) poses a threat to risk stratification and treatment planning. The impact on sexual function, urinary continence, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. Methods: From 2004 [...] Read more.
Background and Objective: Adverse pathology to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (upgrading) poses a threat to risk stratification and treatment planning. The impact on sexual function, urinary continence, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. Methods: From 2004 to 2024, 4189 patients with preop low-/intermediate-risk PCa (Gleason score 6 or 7a, PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL) underwent radical prostatectomy at our department and were analyzed. Primary endpoint was HRQOL, erectile function, and urinary continence. Secondary endpoint was rate of salvage therapies and biochemical-free survival. Propensity score matching was performed using “operative time”, “robot-assisted surgery”, “blood loss”, “nerve-sparing surgery”, “age”, and “BMI” to represent comparable surgical approach. Median follow-up was 39 months (Interquartile-range (IQR) 15–60). Key Findings and Limitations: Patients who were upgraded to high-risk PCa showed a higher rate of postoperative radiotherapy and androgen-deprivation therapy compared to patients who were not upgraded (21% vs. 7%, p < 0.001; 9% vs. 3%, p = 0.002). Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 68% in the upgrading group vs. 84% in the no-upgrading group (p < 0.001). We saw no difference in patient-reported HRQOL, urinary continence, or erectile function. Multivariable analysis showed that postoperative upgrading was a significant risk for not achieving good overall HRQOL (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.97, p = 0.028) during the follow-up. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Although postoperative upgrading to high-risk PCa leads to worse oncologic outcomes and higher salvage therapy rates, this study indicates that its impact on health-related quality of life is minimal and should not deter a cautious approach to radical prostatectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 789 KiB  
Perspective
Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines in Colorectal Cancer: Platforms, Mechanisms, and Combinations
by Chiara Gallio, Luca Esposito and Alessandro Passardi
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2582; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152582 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with high recurrence rates and limited curative options in metastatic settings. Cancer vaccines represent an emerging immunotherapeutic approach that aims to stimulate robust, tumor-specific immune responses. This review summarizes the current state [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with high recurrence rates and limited curative options in metastatic settings. Cancer vaccines represent an emerging immunotherapeutic approach that aims to stimulate robust, tumor-specific immune responses. This review summarizes the current state of CRC vaccine development, including tumor cell-based, dendritic cell-based, peptide-based, nucleic acid-based (DNA and mRNA), and virus-based platforms. We highlight findings from key clinical trials that demonstrate immunogenicity, safety, and preliminary efficacy, with particular attention to combinations with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, we explore critical challenges such as tumor heterogeneity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, and the logistical complexity; in this context, we particularly focus on the current development of personalized cancer vaccines, exploring the newly identified encouraging epitopes and their safety and efficacy in recent trials. The integration of cancer vaccines with in silico modeling, advanced delivery systems such as nanoparticles or AI-guided designs, and microbiome modulation represents a promising avenue for enhancing their clinical utility. Overall, therapeutic and prophylactic cancer vaccines may soon contribute meaningfully to the comprehensive management of CRC, especially in settings of minimal residual disease or early recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 406 KiB  
Systematic Review
Advances in Bidirectional Therapy for Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Combined with Systemic Chemotherapy
by Manuela Robella, Marco Vitturini, Andrea Di Giorgio, Matteo Aulicino, Martin Hubner, Emanuele Koumantakis, Felice Borghi, Paolo Catania, Armando Cinquegrana and Paola Berchialla
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2580; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152580 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a common and challenging manifestation of several gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Bidirectional treatment—combining Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with systemic chemotherapy—has emerged as a strategy to enhance locoregional control while maintaining systemic coverage. Objective: This systematic [...] Read more.
Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a common and challenging manifestation of several gastrointestinal and gynecologic malignancies. Bidirectional treatment—combining Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with systemic chemotherapy—has emerged as a strategy to enhance locoregional control while maintaining systemic coverage. Objective: This systematic review aimed to analyze the study design, characteristics, and timing of the treatments administered—including the type of systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal agents used in PIPAC, and interval between administrations—as well as the clinical outcomes, safety profile, and overall methodological quality of the available literature on bidirectional treatment for peritoneal metastases. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to April 2025. Studies were included if they reported clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bidirectional treatment. Data extraction focused on survival, response assessment (PRGS, PCI), adverse events, systemic and intraperitoneal regimens, treatment interval, and study methodology. Results: A total of 22 studies involving 1015 patients (742 treated with bidirectional therapy) were included. Median overall survival ranged from 2.8 to 19.6 months, with the most favorable outcomes observed in gastric and colorectal cancer cohorts. PRGS improvement after multiple PIPAC cycles was reported in >80% of evaluable cases. High-grade adverse events (CTCAE ≥ 3) occurred in up to 17% of patients in most studies, with only one study reporting treatment-related mortality. However, methodological quality was generally moderate, with considerable heterogeneity in treatment protocols, response criteria, systemic regimens, and toxicity attribution. Conclusions: Bidirectional therapy with PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy appears to be a feasible and potentially effective strategy for selected patients with peritoneal metastases. Despite encouraging outcomes, definitive conclusions are limited by the retrospective nature and heterogeneity of available studies. Prospective standardized trials are needed to confirm efficacy, clarify patient selection, and optimize treatment protocols. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3069 KiB  
Article
Inhibitory Impact of the Amino Benzoic Derivative DAB-2-28 on the Process of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in Human Breast Cancer Cells
by Laurie Fortin, Julie Girouard, Yassine Oufqir, Alexis Paquin, Francis Cloutier, Isabelle Plante, Gervais Bérubé and Carlos Reyes-Moreno
Molecules 2025, 30(15), 3284; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30153284 - 5 Aug 2025
Abstract
Macrophage-mediated inflammation is known to be involved in the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) of various types of cancer. This makes macrophage-derived inflammatory factors prime targets for the development of new treatments. This study uncovers the therapeutic potential and action mechanism of DAB-2-28, a small-molecule [...] Read more.
Macrophage-mediated inflammation is known to be involved in the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) of various types of cancer. This makes macrophage-derived inflammatory factors prime targets for the development of new treatments. This study uncovers the therapeutic potential and action mechanism of DAB-2-28, a small-molecule derived from para-aminobenzoic acid, in the treatment of breast cancer. The luminal MCF-7 and the triple-negative MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines used in this study represent, respectively, breast cancers in which the differentiation states are related to the epithelial phenotype of the mammary gland and breast cancers expressing a highly aggressive mesenchymal phenotype. In MCF-7 cells, soluble factors from macrophage-conditioned media (CM-MØ) induce a characteristic morphology of mesenchymal cells with an upregulated expression of Snail1, a mesenchymal marker, as opposed to a decrease in the expression of E-cadherin, an epithelial marker. DAB-2-28 does not affect the differential expression of Snail1 and E-cadherin in response to CM-MØ, but negatively impacts other hallmarks of EMT by decreasing invasion and migration capacities, in addition to MMP9 expression and gelatinase activity, in both MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Moreover, DAB-2-28 inhibits the phosphorylation of key pro-EMT transcriptional factors, such as NFκB, STAT3, SMAD2, CREB, and/or AKT proteins, in breast cancer cells exposed to different EMT inducers. Overall, our study provides evidence suggesting that inhibition of EMT initiation or maintenance is a key mechanism by which DAB-2-28 can exert anti-tumoral effects in breast cancer cells. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop