Search Results (20)

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess changes in body composition, with a specific focus on fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM), in obese adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with once-weekly (OW) subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide. Methods: This was a single-center, 12-month, real-world, ambispective study (6-month prospective and 6-month retrospective). Body composition parameters were assessed via segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SMF-BIA). Results: A total of 117 patients with DM2, with a median age of 56 years, a median HbA1c level of 9.4%, and a median body weight of 102.5 kg, were included in the study. The median body weight, body fat mass, and visceral fat significantly decreased at 6 months, with values of −9.3, −7.5, and −1.8 kg, respectively. There were further reductions from 6 to 12 months, albeit at a slower rate. The median skeletal muscle mass significantly decreased at 6 months (−1.2 kg), although no further significant reductions were observed at 12 months. Conclusions: OW s.c. semaglutide for 12 months significantly improved body composition parameters, mainly at the expense of fat mass loss, with the preservation of skeletal muscle mass. These changes are clinically meaningful, since they impact general metabolic health and are associated with improvements in metabolic control and clinical parameters associated with renal and CV risks, as well as presumable improvements in quality of life. Full article

Background and Objectives: Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are closely linked and associated with a higher risk of complications. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide in achieving a composite endpoint of A1C and weight reduction. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed the effectiveness of semaglutide in obese patients with T2D at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. This study included patients who received semaglutide treatment for 12 months, and the endpoint was reducing A1C by ≥ 1% and body weight by ≥ 5% after 12 months of starting semaglutide. Secondary endpoints include predictors of achieving the composite endpoint and the effect on the lipid profile. Results: The present study enrolled 459 participants, with dyslipidemia and hypertension being the most common comorbidities. After 12 months of treatment with semaglutide, 42% of the patients achieved the composite endpoint. Semaglutide significantly reduced weight, BMI, A1C, FBG, total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides. The subgroup analysis showed that patients who achieved the composite endpoint were younger and had significantly lower use of insulin. Females in the study had significantly higher BMI, A1C, and HDL levels and lower levels of triglycerides compared to males. Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline BMI (aOR = 0.953; 95% CI: 0.915 to 0.992; p = 0.02), baseline A1C (aOR = 1.213; 95% CI: 1.062 to 1.385; p = 0.004), and receiving insulin (aOR = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.343; p = 0.007) were significant predictors of composite endpoint achievement. Conclusions: Semaglutide is a valuable option for the treatment of obese patients with T2D. This study found that semaglutide is effective in reducing weight and A1C and improving the lipid profile. The predictors of achievement of the composite endpoint were lower baseline BMI, higher baseline A1C, and insulin non-use. Full article

Background: Semaglutide and Liraglutide are medications in the Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1 RAs) class used to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in Saudi Arabia. Although the 1.0 mg once weekly dosage of Semaglutide does not have a labeled indication for the management of obesity, many believe that this dosage is more effective than the 3.0 mg once daily Liraglutide dosage for the management of both diabetes and obesity. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the dosage of 1.0 mg of Semaglutide administered once weekly versus 3.0 mg of Liraglutide administered once daily in controlling HbA1c levels, promoting weight loss, and evaluating their financial implications among obese patients in Saudi Arabia using real-world data. Methods: A retrospective review of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) from January 2021 to June 2024 was conducted on patients prescribed Semaglutide or Liraglutide for at least 12 months. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing severe conditions (e.g., cardiovascular disease, stroke, or cancer) and missing baseline data. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in HbA1c, weight, and direct medical costs. Results: Two hundred patients (100 patients on the 1.0 mg once weekly dose of Semaglutide and 100 patients on the 3.0 mg once daily dose of Liraglutide) of those randomly selected from the EMRs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Of the 200 eligible patients (65.5% female, mean age 48.54 years), weight loss was greater with Semaglutide (−8.09 kg) than Liraglutide (−5.884 kg). HbA1c reduction was also greater with Semaglutide (−1.073%) than Liraglutide (−0.298%). The use of Semaglutide resulted in lower costs of USD −1264.76 (95% CI: −1826.82 to 33.76) and greater reductions in weight of −2.22 KG (95% CI: −7.68 to −2.784), as well as lower costs of USD −1264.76 (95% CI: (−2368.16 to −239.686) and greater reductions in HbA1c of −0.77% (95% CI: −0.923 to −0.0971) in more than 95% of the cost effectiveness bootstrap distributions. Conclusions: Semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly seems to be more effective and cost-saving in managing prediabetes, diabetes, and obesity compared to Liraglutide 3.0 mg daily. Future studies should examine these findings using a more representative sample and a robust study design. Full article

Background/Objectives: Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist, is a well-established pharmacologic agent for inducing weight loss in individuals with obesity and is prescribed regardless of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) status. However, it remains unclear whether the weight-lowering efficacy of semaglutide differs significantly between individuals with and without DM. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide at 2.4 mg on weight loss in adults with and without DM. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving overweight or obese adults receiving semaglutide at 2.4 mg weekly for 40 to 70 weeks. Using a random-effects model, we estimated the weighted mean differences in body weight reduction between the two groups. Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria, among which two provided subgroup data for participants with and without DM within the same trial population. Registration number in PROSPERO: CRD420251077610. Results: In participants with DM (n = 4 studies), semaglutide was associated with a weighted mean body weight reduction of −6.34% (95% confidence interval: −6.98 to −5.69), with negligible heterogeneity across studies (I² = 0.0%). By contrast, among participants without DM (n = 7 studies), the weighted estimate of weight loss was −11.57% (95% confidence interval: −12.94 to −10.19), with moderate heterogeneity observed (I² = 63.6%). Conclusions: The observed difference in weight loss efficacy between the groups was clinically meaningful. While once-weekly semaglutide at 2.4 mg elicited significant weight loss in both populations, the magnitude of effect was notably greater in those without DM. This disparity may be explained by metabolic characteristics frequently present in individuals with DM, such as insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and compensatory mechanisms related to glycemic control. Full article

Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in enhancing glycemic control, regulating body weight, and modulating lipid metabolism. However, their effects on lipoprotein subfractions have not been clarified. The objective of this 52-week, single-center, randomized trial was to compare the effects of subcutaneous semaglutide administered once weekly and oral sitagliptin administered once daily on anthropometric measurements and lipoprotein subfractions measured by Lipoprint gelelectrophoresis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A total of 34 obese individuals with T2DM were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to receive semaglutide (n = 18) or sitagliptin (n = 16). Thirty-one age- and body weight-matched non-diabetic obese individuals served as controls. Semaglutide treatment resulted in significant reductions in body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and Hb_A1c, along with improvements in lipid parameters, including reductions in LDL cholesterol and non-HDL cholesterol levels, and redistribution of LDL and HDL subfractions toward a less atherogenic profile. Conversely, sitagliptin elicited modest glycemic improvements without substantial alterations in lipid composition. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that fluctuations in lipoprotein subfractions were not influenced by changes in BMI or HbA1c. These results support the pleiotropic metabolic benefits of semaglutide and its potential role in managing the cardiometabolic risk of T2DM. Full article

The last two decades have proffered many remarkable choices in managing type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Leading the list are glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), the first of which, exenatide, was approved by the FDA in 2005. Two other major classes of drugs have also entered the market: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, commonly known as gliptins and approved in 2006, and sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, with the first approval occurring in 2013. These drugs have revolutionized the treatment of diabetes. Additionally, on the horizon, the once-weekly basal insulin analog insulin icodec and the once-weekly combination of insulin icodec and semaglutide are expected to be available in the future. Beyond glycemic control, GLP1RAs have exhibited benefits in conditions associated with diabetes, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, as well as in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. Additionally, emerging research suggests potential roles in certain types of cancer, infertility, and associative learning. Major cardiovascular events seem to be lower in patients on GLP1RAs. While some evidence is robust, other findings remain tenuous. It is important that clinicians are familiar with current research in order to provide optimal evidence-based care to patients. In the not-too-distant future, there may be a case to prescribe these drugs for benefits outside diabetes. Full article

Background/Objectives: Obesity is heterogeneous and considered a chronic epidemic with significant un-met needs for management, treatment, and prevention. Methods: In this study, we used LizAI’s software TAITAN (alpha version) for the mega-collection and analysis of clinical data from 10,407 trials addressing obesity and obesity-related diseases and their associated publications, mainly on PubMed. Results: We report an intensive growth of clinical trials until the end of 2024 and highlight the use of the body mass index (BMI) as a critical criterion in clinical participant selection despite its limitations. The significant disparities in races, regions, and the sites of trials across all studies have not been addressed, posing the possibility of research in the far future on the applications of precision medicine in weight management. In the latter parts of this paper, we analyze and discuss the clinical efficacy, mainly focusing on the primary endpoints and benchmarks of the recently FDA-approved once-weekly injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) drugs, including semaglutide and tirzepatide. Both drugs have functioned comparably when considering the 5% weight loss FDA threshold. Tirzepatide outperforms semaglutide and impacts fewer participants as the weight loss level increases from 5 to 20% and has greater effects in different populations, especially in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Conclusions: We would, however, like to highlight that (i) the weight loss level should be dependent on the clinically relevant needs of patients, and faster and greater weight loss might not be a win, and (ii) the clinical benefits, safety, and quality of life of patients should be carefully assessed when the weight loss is significant in a short period. In our search, we found that the specificities and impacts of weight loss therapies on organs like the kidneys and heart, different muscle types, bones, and fat accumulation in different parts of body were not investigated or disclosed during the clinical study period and longer term monitoring. In light of scientific needs and remarkable public interest in weight loss, our report provides findings on the buzz around losing weight in clinical trials, and our TAITAN software continues to collect data in real time and enrich its knowledge for future updates. Full article

The last two decades have provided far more options f both patients and their physicians in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. While dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been approved for nearly two decades, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are relatively new. Of interest to perioperative physicians, these drugs present specific perioperative concerns, prompting many societies to issue guidelines. Retained gastric contents due to slow gastric emptying is a significant drawback of GLP-1RAs, increasing the risk of aspiration. Recommendations include withholding GLP-1RAs for a predefined period of time, performing gastric ultrasound to evaluate gastric contents, modifying anesthesia management, particularly with regard to the airway, or canceling the scheduled (elective) surgery or procedure. SGLT-2is are known to increase the risk of euglycemic ketoacidosis. The benefits of both GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is extend beyond the treatment of diabetes. As a result, perioperative physicians may encounter their use outside of their traditional indications. SGLT-2is are being used extensively to treat heart failure and obesity, for example. There have been other developments as well. For instance, Imeglimin, a variant of metformin available in Japan and India, Icodec, a once-weekly basal insulin formulation, and IcoSema, a once-weekly combination of Icodec plus semaglutide, are all being explored, although in their early stages or facing approval challenges. Full article

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly impacts global health due to its complications and the economic burden it places on healthcare systems. The rise of novel once-weekly diabetes medications with different mechanisms of action necessitates an evaluation of their relative efficacy and safety. Objectives: This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly insulin analogs (icodec and BIF) with once-weekly GLP-1/GIP agonists (semaglutide, exenatide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide) in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared these treatments with a baseline of daily basal insulin. Primary outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and tolerability. Results: The analysis integrated data from 25 RCTs, involving 18,257 patients. Tirzepatide significantly outperformed other treatments in reducing HbA1c and promoting weight loss. Weekly insulins, compared to GLP-1/GIP agonists, showed a more tolerable profile and were beneficial for certain patient demographics emphasizing weight stability. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that while once-weekly GLP-1/GIP agonists provide superior glycemic control and weight management, weekly insulins offer viable options for patients prioritizing fewer side effects and weight stability. This comprehensive comparison aids in refining personalized treatment strategies for T2DM management. Full article

Although, in randomized clinical trials, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (OW s.c.) has demonstrated superior efficacy in comparison with placebo and active controls in terms of glycemic control and body weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), these results need to be confirmed in a real-world (RW) setting. An RW ambispective study (6 months retrospective and 6 months prospective) was conducted in 10 tertiary hospitals in Spain. We evaluated changes in HbA1c and body weight in patients with T2DM treated with semaglutide OW s.c. Additionally, we analyzed different subgroups of patients treated with semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. A total of 752 patients with a mean age of 60.2 years, a mean HbA1c level of 8.5%, a mean body weight of 101.6 kg, and a mean T2DM duration of 10 years were included. At 12 months, compared with baseline, there was a mean difference of −2.1% in HbA1c levels (p < 0.001) and a mean difference of 9.2 kg in body weight (p < 0.001). Moreover, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) between baseline and month 12 in both HbA1c and body weight in the four subgroups receiving semaglutide OW s.c. as an add-on to glucose-lowering therapy. Semaglutide OW s.c. was well tolerated, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most commonly reported side effects. In this RW study, 12 months of treatment with semaglutide OW s.c. in patients with T2DM was associated with significant and clinically relevant improvements in glycemic control and weight loss, regardless of the glucose-lowering therapy received, and the overall safety profile was positive. Full article

Once-weekly semaglutide is a widely used glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). In clinical trials, semaglutide improved glycemic control and obesity, and reduced major cardiovascular events. However, the reports are limited on its real-world efficacy relating to various metabolic factors such as dyslipidemia or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in Asian patients with T2D. In our retrospective longitudinal study, we selected patients with T2D who were given once-weekly semaglutide and compared metabolic parameters before and after the start of semaglutide. Seventy-five patients were eligible. HbA1c decreased significantly, by 0.7–0.9%, and body weight by 1.4–1.7 kg during the semaglutide treatment. Non-HDL cholesterol decreased significantly at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initiation of semaglutide; LDL cholesterol decreased at 3 and 6 months; and HDL cholesterol increased at 12 months. The effects on body weight, HbA1c and lipid profile were pronounced in patients who were given semaglutide as a first GLP-1RA (GLP-1R naïve), whereas improvements in HbA1c were also observed in patients who were given semaglutide after being switched from other GLP-1RAs. During a 12-month semaglutide treatment, the hepatic steatosis index (HSI) tended to decrease. Moreover, a significant decrease in the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) was observed in GLP-1RA naïve patients. Our real-world study confirmed the beneficial effects of once-weekly semaglutide, namely, improved body weight, glycemic control and atherogenic lipid profile. The beneficial effects on MASLD were also suggested. Full article

Background: The number of people with type 2 diabetes is increasing daily, and therefore, effective therapy is needed to successfully regulate glycemia and reduce the risk of associated complications. Recently, an oral formulation of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) semaglutide has become available. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of the new oral formulation and the existing injectable formulation of semaglutide in terms of glycemic and body weight control in a real-world setting. Patients and methods: This was a single-center retrospective observational study conducted at the Rijeka Clinical Hospital Centre. A total of 106 patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 7%) on different oral or basal insulin supported oral therapy were enrolled in the study, and data from electronic medical records were retrospectively collected and analyzed from May 2021 to November 2022. All subjects were GLP-1 RA-naive and consequently prescribed 0.5 or 1.0 mg of once weekly injectable semaglutide (IS) or 7 mg or 14 mg of once daily oral semaglutide (OS) for at least 6 months. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed prior to semaglutide administration and after a 6-month follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c, and secondary endpoints were the change in body weight and the proportion of participants with a reduction in body weight of ≥5% and ≥10%, respectively, 6 months after the initiation of semaglutide treatment. Results: At the 6-month follow-up, no significant difference was observed between the two formulations in terms of HbA1c reduction (IS −1.1% vs. OS −1.4%, p = 0.126) and weight loss (IS −6.50 kg vs. OS −5.90 kg, p = 0.714). Exactly the same proportion of participants in both groups achieved a weight loss of ≥5% (56.7%, n = 30). A weight loss ≥ 10% was observed in 20.7% (n = 11) of participants administered IS and 15.1% (n = 8) of participants administered OS, respectively (p = 0.454). Conclusion: In a real-world setting, oral semaglutide as an add-on therapy to ongoing antihyperglycemic treatment in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes who had not previously received GLP-1 RA demonstrated a similar effectiveness as injectable semaglutide in terms of glycemic control and weight loss after 6 months of treatment. Full article

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is closely related to some metabolic disorders, such as central obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), such as semaglutide, may have therapeutic roles in MASLD associated with T2D. This study aims to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of semaglutide on MASLD in terms of progression from liver steatosis to fibrosis. We characterized exosomes from ten patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) before (T0) and after 12 months (T12) of treatment with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide. Six of ten patients were considered responders to therapy (R) based on MASLD severity downgrading by at least one class according to a validated ultrasonographic (US) score. Normal hepatocytes (HEPA-RG) and stellate (LX-2) cells were challenged with exosomes from R and NR patients, isolated before and after 12 months of therapy. Exosomes from both R and NR patients isolated at T0 significantly affected LX-2 viability. After 12 months of treatment, only those isolated from R patients restored cell viability, whereas those from NR patients did not. No effects were observed on HEPA-RG cells. Exosomes at T12 from R but not from NR patients significantly decreased the production of α-SMA, a marker of LX-2 activation, a liver stellate cell model, and ph-SMAD2 and CTGF, involved in fibrosis processes. TGF-β1 was not modulated by the exosomes of R and NR patients. As a downstream effect, Vimentin, Collagen 1A1, and Fibronectin extracellular matrix components were also downregulated, as measured by droplets digital PCR. In conclusion, these results shed light on the potential effectiveness of semaglutide in improving liver fibrosis in MASLD. Full article

Background: Diabetes is the primary contributor to cardiovascular disease risk, and when combined with obesity, it further underscores the significance of cardiovascular risk assessment. Methods: A retrospective study of 64 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity on once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide stratified by cardiovascular risk categories determined using the SCORE2/SCORE2-OP, SCORE2-Diabetes, and ASCVD score calculations. We compare the differences between groups (ASCVD: low + borderline + intermediate versus high-risk group; SCORE2/SCORE2-OP: low + moderate versus high + very high-risk group and SCORE2-Diabetes: low + moderate versus high + very high-risk group) in terms of change from baseline in body mass index (BMI) and HbA1c and weight loss outcomes. Results: Patients in the high-risk group, according to ASCVD risk score, had statistically better results in weight loss ≥ 3%, ≥5%, and ≥10% compared to ASCVD low + borderline + intermediate and without difference regarding HbA1c. According to SCORE2/SCORE2-OP, the high + very high-risk group had statistically better HbA1c and weight loss results but only for ≥5% versus the low + moderate risk group. Based on the score SCORE2-Diabetes, the high + very high-risk group had statistically significant better results in lowering HbA1c and weight loss but only for ≥5% versus the low + moderate risk group. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the initial investigation linking glycemic control and weight reduction outcomes in individuals with T2D and obesity treated with once-weekly semaglutide stratified by cardiovascular risk categories determined using the SCORE2/SCORE2-OP, SCORE2-Diabetes and ASCVD score calculations. Full article

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an important common comorbidity in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Although some glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have beneficial effects on NAFLD, the efficacy of once-weekly semaglutide has not been established. This was a subanalysis of the SWITCH-SEMA 1 study, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial comparing switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to once-weekly semaglutide in subjects with T2DM (SWITCH) versus continuing current GLP-1RAs (Continue) for 24 weeks. This subanalysis consisted of participants who were suspected to have NAFLD [fatty liver index (FLI) ≥ 30]. In total, 58 participants met the criteria of this subanalysis. There were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics between the SWITCH (n = 31) and Continue groups (n = 27). FLI significantly improved during treatment in the SWITCH group (68.6 to 62.7) but not in the Continue group (71.1 to 72.3) (p < 0.01). The improvement of FLI in the SWITCH group was greater in switching from dulaglutide to semaglutide and significantly correlated with older age (p = 0.016) and lower baseline FLI (p < 0.01). The multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the switch from dulaglutide was associated with an improvement in FLI (p = 0.041). Switching from conventional GLP-1RAs to once-weekly semaglutide might be beneficial for individuals with NAFLD complicated with T2DM. Full article