Search Results (295)

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common and debilitating treatment-related adverse event that can profoundly impact quality of life and financial well-being. Although prospective surveillance and early intervention for BCRL have been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of this chronic condition, diagnostic accuracy of screening, programmatic utilization and efficacy vary widely. We describe the protocol for the BCRL Prospective Surveillance Model (PSM) and Early Intervention Program at the Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center that aims to address these issues by augmenting arm measurements (standard of care) with use of patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs). Methods: Women with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer at high risk for developing BCRL based on tumor and treatment characteristics are eligible for inclusion in our PSM care pathway, which uses both the Breast Cancer and Lymphedema Symptom Experience Index PROMs and arm measurements for screening. Screening begins prior to the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy and continues at regular intervals postoperatively. A positive screen, defined as new patient-reported arm swelling/heaviness and/or relative volume change (RVC) ≥ 5% in the affected limb, triggers consideration for multidisciplinary early intervention. Analysis: The BCRL detection rate will be compared to years previous to protocol development. PSM feasibility will be determined according to the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Efficacy of the PSM will be gauged by comparing change in patient-reported outcomes of interest and arm volume measurement pre and post early intervention. Feasibility will be determined by calculating the percentage of PSM-eligible individuals who complete all PSM activities in a 1-year span. Characteristics of participants versus non-participants in the target population will be compared. Furthermore, 1:1 semi-structured interviews with enrolled patients will be performed to understand facilitators and barriers to implementation. Conclusions: The findings from this study will be used to develop a standardized approach to PSM and early intervention that can be adapted to both resource-modest and resource-abundant healthcare infrastructures. Full article

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer with a poor prognosis. Negative-margin resection is presently the only potentially curative treatment option. Emerging trends with direct applicability to surgical strategy include margin thickness, lymphadenectomy, optimization of future liver remnant (FLR), minimally invasive techniques, incorporation of systemic therapy, and reconsideration of liver transplantation. This review emphasizes areas of consensus and ongoing debate. Margins ≥5–10 mm are associated with improved results, but biology generally takes precedence over prognosis. Regional lymphadenectomy enhances staging accuracy, although its therapeutic benefit remains unsettled. PVE is standard for FLR enlargement, LVD provides faster hypertrophy, and ALPPS remains reserved for highly selective cases. Minimally invasive and robotic hepatectomy share oncologic results in skilled institutions. Systemic therapies, including immunotherapy and biomarker-directed targeted therapy, are increasingly being incorporated perioperatively. Liver transplant may be of potential value in early-stage disease or on strict indications after neoadjuvant treatment. The modern surgical management of iCCA encompasses a blend of oncologic considerations, FLR optimization, minimally invasive surgery, and systemic therapy according to tumor biology. Multidisciplinary planning and participation in clinical trials are necessary to align surgical innovation with advancements in molecular and systemic treatments, ultimately leading to improved long-term outcomes. Full article

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, has a poor prognosis due to rapid recurrence and treatment resistance. This review examines the evolution of radiotherapy (RT) for GBM management, from whole-brain RT to modern techniques like intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), guided by 2023 European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) and 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recommendations. The standard Stupp protocol (60 Gy/30 fractions with temozolomide [TMZ]) improves overall survival (OS) to 14.6 months, with greater benefits in O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated tumors (21.7 months). Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) extend median overall survival (mOS) to 31.6 months in MGMT-methylated patients and 20.9 months overall in supratentorial GBM (EF-14 trial). However, 80–90% of recurrences occur within 2 cm of the irradiated field due to tumor infiltration and radioresistance driven by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) mutations, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions, tumor hypoxia, and tumor stem cells. Pseudoprogression, distinguished using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and positron emission tomography (PET), complicates response evaluation. Targeted therapies (e.g., bevacizumab; PARP inhibitors) and immunotherapies (e.g., pembrolizumab; oncolytic viruses), alongside advanced imaging (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], amino acid PET), support personalized RT. Ongoing trials evaluating reirradiation, hypofractionation, stereotactic radiosurgery, neoadjuvant therapies, proton therapy (PT), boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), and AI-driven planning aim to enhance efficacy for GBM IDH-wildtype, but phase III trials are needed to improve survival and quality of life. Full article

Skin cancer is the most common cancer form worldwide, and it is primarily divided into melanoma and non-melanoma types, with non-melanoma being the most prevalent condition. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) accounts for 50% of primary skin cancers and is characterized by uncontrolled keratinocyte proliferation. cSCC’s current standard treatment is surgical resection and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, these methods often lead to disfigurement, functional morbiditly, and compromised function. In contrast to immunotherapy, emerging scenarios have shown promising results, especially in neoadjuvant settings. Cemiplimab (Libtayo^®; Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY, USA), a PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has shown efficacy in treating advanced or metastatic cSCC, and its use as a neoadjuvant therapy has been recently explored. This review aims to evaluate Cemiplimab in the neoadjuvant setting for cSCC treatment. The Methodology followed PRISMA guidelines, this review analyzed studies on Cemiplimab as a neoadjuvant therapy for cSCC that were sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Only controlled trials, cohort studies, case series, and systematic reviews were included. From 341 records, 21 studies were included, and six clinical trials provided key data about neoadjuvant Cemiplimab’s response rates, efficacy, adverse effects, and safety considerations. The targeted data revealed a neoadjuvant Cemiplimab mean pathologic response rate of 72%, with a 62% objective response rate. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) affect 66% of patients, though most cases are not severe. The most common include fatigue, maculopapular rash, and diarrhea. The studies showed high rates of complete pathological responses (cPRs) and major pathological responses (mPRs), suggesting a strong therapeutic potential. Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab for cSCC therapy shows high response rates, low recurrence, improved survival, and manageable side effects. The current literature indicates that Cemiplimab may also be effective when used in immunosuppressed patients. Despite more research still being needed to confirm its long-term benefits and the effects of the drug’s use outside of clinical trials, there is strong evidence to consider neoadjuvant Cemiplimab as a promising and efficient treatment. Full article

Background/Objectives: The current standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). If the neoadjuvant treatment results in a clinical complete response (cCR), non-operative management of LARC might be possible. It is hypothesized that cCR rates will increase with increasing radiotherapy doses. By using proton therapy, doses to organs at risk (OAR) may be decreased. In preparation for a clinical trial on dose-escalated proton therapy for LARC, the purpose of this study is to establish the feasibility of proton therapy for dose-escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy of LARC. Methods: Ten patients, having previously received short course radiotherapy (SCRT) for LARC, were included in this planning study. Two photon plans and two proton plans were created for each patient: one with a standard 5 × 5 Gy fractionation and one dose-escalated up to 5 × 7 Gy. Proton plans were robustly optimized. For all plans the integral dose (ID) was computed, and for the proton plans relative biological effectiveness (RBE) distributions were calculated. Feasibility was assessed in terms of target coverage and OAR doses. Results: All treatment plans satisfied target coverage criteria. Three of the photon and two of the proton dose-escalated plans exceeded recommended OAR objectives. Proton IDs were on average lower by a factor of 1.97 compared to photon IDs. Mean doses to OAR were, in general, lower for protons. All proton RBE values in the escalated target volumes were between 1.09 and 1.16. Conclusions: The proposed dose escalation was found to be feasible. Protons can reduce the integral dose and mean doses to OARs compared to photons in both the dose-escalated and non-escalated cases. Differences in RBE between escalated and standard fractionation were small. Full article

Background/Objectives: Patients with breast cancer who do not achieve a complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may benefit from intensified adjuvant systemic therapy. However, such treatment escalation is typically delayed until after tumour resection, which occurs several months into the treatment course. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) can detect early microstructural changes in tumours and may enable timely identification of non-responders during NAC, allowing for earlier treatment intensification. In our previous prospective observational study, 100 breast cancer patients underwent QUS imaging before and four times during NAC. Machine learning algorithms based on QUS texture features acquired in the first week of treatment were developed and achieved 78% accuracy in predicting treatment response. In the current study, we aimed to validate these algorithms in an independent prospective cohort to assess reproducibility and confirm their clinical utility. Methods: We included breast cancer patients eligible for NAC per standard of care, with tumours larger than 1.5 cm. QUS imaging was acquired at baseline and during the first week of treatment. Tumour response was defined as a ≥30% reduction in target lesion size on the resection specimen compared to baseline imaging. Results: A total of 51 patients treated between 2018 and 2021 were included (median age 49 years; median tumour size 3.6 cm). Most were estrogen receptor–positive (65%) or HER2-positive (33%), and the majority received dose-dense AC-T (n = 34, 67%) or FEC-D (n = 15, 29%) chemotherapy, with or without trastuzumab. The support vector machine algorithm achieved an area under the curve of 0.71, with 86% accuracy, 91% specificity, 50% sensitivity, 93% negative predictive value, and 43% positive predictive value for predicting treatment response. Misclassifications were primarily associated with poorly defined tumours and difficulties in accurately identifying the region of interest. Conclusions: Our findings validate QUS-based machine learning models for early prediction of chemotherapy response and support their potential as non-invasive tools for treatment personalization and clinical trial development focused on early treatment intensification. Full article

The management of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) remains a topic of active debate. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shown clinical benefits in BR-PDAC, especially in increasing resectability and achieving higher rates of margin-negative (R0) resections, its role in R-PDAC is less clearly defined. Additionally, the role of immunotherapy in PDAC is still being explored, with ongoing trials investigating new combinations to overcome the tumor’s immune-resistant microenvironment. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the current evidence comparing NAT with upfront surgery in pancreatic cancer management, focusing on randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that assess outcomes in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. The review aims to determine whether NAT offers a significant survival advantage over traditional post-operative strategies and to clarify which clinical scenarios may benefit most from NAT. The literature was identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to March 2025. Article selection adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Our review of existing evidence supports NAT as the standard of care for BR-PDAC. Meanwhile, management of R-PDAC should be tailored individually, guided by risk stratification that considers both clinical parameters and molecular features. Immunotherapy and targeted therapies are still in early research phases, and their further integration as NAT remains controversial. Full article

Background/Objectives: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and biologically distinct subset of urothelial malignancies, comprising approximately 5–10% of urothelial cancers. UTUC presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with both a higher likelihood of invasive disease at presentation and a less favorable prognosis compared to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Current treatment strategies for UTUC are largely derived from bladder cancer studies, underscoring the need for UTUC-directed research. This review provides a comprehensive overview of UTUC, encompassing diagnostic approaches, systemic and intraluminal therapies, surgical management, and future directions. Methods: A narrative review was conducted synthesizing evidence from guideline-based recommendations, retrospective and prospective clinical studies, and ongoing trials focused on UTUC. Results: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is increasingly preferred in UTUC due to the risk of postoperative renal impairment that may preclude adjuvant cisplatin use. Surgical management includes kidney-sparing approaches and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), with selection guided by tumor risk and patient comorbidities. While endoscopic management (EM) preserves renal function, it carries a higher recurrence and surveillance burden; RNU remains standard for high-risk cases. Systemic therapy for advanced and metastatic UTUC mirrors that of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy over chemotherapy in the EV-302 trial, with improved response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival across subgroups, including UTUC. For patients ineligible for EV, the CheckMate-901 study supported first-line chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nivolumab. Further systemic therapy strategies include maintenance avelumab post-chemotherapy (JAVELIN Bladder 100), targeted therapies such as erdafitinib (THOR trial), and trastuzumab deruxtecan (DESTINY-PanTumor02) in FGFR2/3-altered and HER2-positive disease, respectively. Conclusions: Historically, the therapeutic landscape of UTUC has been extrapolated from bladder cancer; however, ongoing research specific to UTUC is deriving more precise regimens involving the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and biomarker-driven therapies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Primary malignant lung tumors in children are rare and diagnostically challenging. This study presents a single-center experience in the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors, emphasizing the role of histopathological and genetic profiling in informing individualized therapeutic strategies. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of seven pediatric patients (ages 2–18) treated from 2015 to 2025. Diagnostics included laboratory tests, chest CT, bronchoscopy, and histopathological/immunohistochemical analysis. Treatment primarily involved surgical resection, complemented by chemo-, radio-, or targeted therapies when indicated. Results: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) represented the most commonly diagnosed entity (3/7 cases). The tumors presented with nonspecific symptoms, most frequently dry cough. Tumor type distribution was age-dependent, with aggressive forms such as pleuropulmonary blastoma predominantly affecting younger children, whereas IMT and carcinoid tumors were more common in older patients. Surgical resection remained the mainstay of treatment in the majority of cases. Bronchoscopy served as a valuable adjunct in the initial management of tumors exhibiting intraluminal growth, allowing for direct visualization, tissue sampling, and partial debulking to alleviate airway obstruction. In patients with an initially unresectable IMT harboring specific gene fusion rearrangement (e.g., TFG::ROS1), neoadjuvant targeted therapy with crizotinib enabled adequate tumor shrinkage to allow for subsequent surgical resection. Two patients in the study cohort died as a result of disease progression. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary diagnostic approach—integrating radiologic, bronchoscopic, histopathological, and genetic evaluations—ensures high diagnostic accuracy. While conventional treatments remain curative in many cases, targeted therapies directed at specific molecular alterations may offer essential therapeutic options for selected patients. Full article

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a formidable malignancy with rising incidence and dismal long-term survival, largely due to late-stage presentation and intrinsic resistance to therapy. Recent advances in the multidisciplinary management of PDAC have reshaped treatment paradigms across disease stages. For localized disease, innovations in surgical techniques and the adoption of neoadjuvant strategies have improved resection rates and survival outcomes. In metastatic settings, multiagent chemotherapy regimens and precision therapies targeting BRCA mutations and rare gene fusions are expanding treatment options. Immunotherapeutic modalities, including checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive cell therapies, and mRNA vaccines, show emerging promise despite PDAC’s traditionally immunosuppressive microenvironment. This review synthesizes the current evidence on established therapies and critically evaluates novel and investigational approaches poised to redefine the therapeutic landscape of pancreatic cancer. Full article

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a major clinical challenge due to its aggressive behavior and lack of targeted therapies. Accurate early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is essential for guiding personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes. In this study, we present an attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) framework designed to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) directly from pre-treatment hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained biopsy slides. The model was trained on a retrospective in-house cohort of 174 TNBC patients and externally validated on an independent cohort (n = 30). It achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 during five-fold cross-validation and 0.78 on external testing, demonstrating robust predictive performance and generalizability. To enhance model interpretability, attention maps were spatially co-registered with multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) data stained for PD-L1, CD8+ T cells, and CD163+ macrophages. The attention regions exhibited moderate spatial overlap with immune-enriched areas, with mean Intersection over Union (IoU) scores of 0.47 for PD-L1, 0.45 for CD8+ T cells, and 0.46 for CD163+ macrophages. The presence of these biomarkers in high-attention regions supports their biological relevance to NACT response in TNBC. This not only improves model interpretability but may also inform future efforts to identify clinically actionable histological biomarkers directly from H&E-stained biopsy slides, further supporting the utility of this approach for accurate NACT response prediction and advancing precision oncology in TNBC. Full article

Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy for IBC has shown a strong correlation with event-free survival and overall survival. Over the past three decades, the five-year net survival rate for breast cancer has generally increased; however, several Eastern European countries exhibit lower survival rates. Data from Romania, specifically regarding Her2-positive breast cancer response to therapy, are notably limited. Background/Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the response to NAT using chemotherapy and Her2-targeted therapy in a cohort of 167 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in our institution. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 167 consecutive cases diagnosed with IBC in our institution between January 2020 and September 2024 with Stages II and III Her2-positive IBC. The overall pCR rates and several factors cited in the literature as predictors of pCR were analyzed. Results: Overall, the pCR rate was 50.29%, with higher values in 3+ cases (62.28%) compared to 2+ cases/ISH amplified (24.53%). Higher pCR rates were observed in hormone-negative cases, Stage II cases, estrogen receptor-negative cases, and high Ki-67 values. Patient age, ISH group, Her2 copy number, Her2:CEP17 ratio, and clinical lymph node involvement did not seem to influence pCR rates in our study. Conclusions: The data presented in our study represent, to the best of our knowledge, the largest cohort of patients diagnosed with Her2-positive IBC from Romania. The presented results and the pCR predictive factors were comparable to those cited in other studies on Her2-positive IBC cases. Full article

Background and Objectives: The clinical value of HER2-low breast cancer (BC), defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of 1+ or 2+/ISH-negative without HER2 amplification, remains unclear in the neoadjuvant setting. This study aimed to determine whether HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors differ in pathological complete response (pCR) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) among early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 134 early BC patients treated with NAC between 2017 and 2023. Patients were categorized as HER2-zero (IHC 0) or HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH–). The primary endpoint was total pCR (tpCR); secondary endpoints included breast (bpCR), nodal (npCR), and radiologic complete response (rCR), alongside DFS analysis stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status. Results: Of the cohort, 91 patients (67.9%) were HER2-zero and 43 (32.1%) were HER2-low. There was no statistically significant difference in tpCR (26.4% vs. 27.9%, p = 0.852), bpCR (28.6% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.843), npCR (37.4% vs. 32.6%, p = 0.588), and rCR (23.1% vs. 30.2%, p = 0.374) between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups. DFS did not significantly differ between HER2-zero and HER2-low groups overall (p = 0.714), nor within HR-positive (p = 0.540) or TNBC (p = 0.523) subgroups. Conclusions: HER2-low tumors demonstrated similar pathological responses and survival outcomes compared to HER2-zero tumors. While a HER2-low status does not appear to define a distinct biological subtype in early BC, it remains a relevant classification for emerging HER2-targeted therapies, needing further investigation in prospective studies. Full article

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Nonetheless, deeper molecular understanding of NSCLC has resulted in novel therapeutic approaches, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, which have improved patient prognosis and outcomes in recent years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with or without chemotherapy, are now considered valuable components of treatment for NSCLC cases that do not have specific actionable genetic mutations. Patients with actionable genetic mutations are candidates for targeted therapies. The primary focus of this review is the rationale for using ICIs in the perioperative setting for patients with resectable NSCLC and in advanced disease settings. Furthermore, we compare the benefits of using ICIs with the challenges associated with their clinical implementation in resectable and advanced NSCLC. Finally, we emphasize the development of novel treatment strategies that potentially provide an optimal treatment choice for patients with advanced NSCLC. Full article

Background/Objectives: Breast cancer tumors possess intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH), which is associated with therapeutic resistance. Tumors with high ITH exhibit human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) heterogeneity, affecting the effectiveness of HER2-targeted therapies. Our recent study identified HER2 ITH as an independent prognostic factor for poor outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer. We here investigated the association between HER2 ITH and anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) resistance. Methods: This study included 97 patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer treated with anti-HER2 NAC. Breast tumor samples were obtained from vacuum-assisted breast biopsy before NAC. HER2 gene amplification was assessed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and HER2 gene copy number histograms were generated. Using the Gaussian mixture model, histogram data were analyzed and categorized into the high (HH) and low HER2 heterogeneity (LH) groups. The association between HER2 ITH and treatment response was evaluated using the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Results: Of the 97 patients, 18 (18.6%) and 79 (81.4%) were classified into the HH and LH groups, respectively. The pCR rate in the HH group was significantly lower at 28% (5/18) than that in the LH group at 65% (51/79) (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis of pathological parameters revealed that the most significant predictor of pCR rate was HER2 ITH (p = 0.02). Conclusions: HER2 ITH assessment may be valuable in predicting therapeutic outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer. Our novel approach of the HER2 ITH method using FISH histograms could serve as a useful tool for predicting anti-HER2 NAC resistance. Full article