Search Results (17)

This study evaluated the genetic parameters for growth and Vibrio parahaemolyticus (Vp_AHPND) resistance in both the introduced MK strain and the self-constructed GK strain of Penaeus vannamei, investigating the impact of genotyped female parents on trait estimates under a single-parent nested mating design. A total of 32 families from the MK strain and 44 families from the GK strain were analyzed. Fifty-four female parents from both strains were genotyped using the “Yellow Sea Chip No. 1” containing 10.0 K SNPs. In the MK strain, heritability estimates ranged from 0.439 to 0.458 for body weight (Bw) and from 0.308 to 0.489 for survival time (ST) and survival rates at 36 h (36 SR), 50% mortality (SS₅₀), and 60 h (60 SR). In the GK strain, heritability for Bw ranged from 0.724 to 0.726, while ST, 36 SR, SS₅₀, and 60 SR had heritability estimates between 0.370 and 0.593. Genetic correlations between Bw and ST were 0.601 to 0.622 in the MK strain and 0.742 to 0.744 in the GK strain. For Bw and survival rates, correlations ranged from 0.120 to 0.547 in the MK strain and from 0.426 to 0.906 in the GK strain. The genetic correlation between ST and survival rates was not significantly different from 1 (p > 0.05) in both strains. High Pearson correlations (0.853 to 0.997, p < 0.01) were observed among survival rates at different points. Predictive accuracies for Bw, ST, and survival rates using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) were comparable to pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (pBLUP) in the MK strain, while in the GK strain, ssGBLUP improved predictive accuracies for Bw, ST, and SS₅₀ by 0.20%, 0.32%, and 0.38%, respectively. The results indicate that both growth and Vp_AHPND resistance have significant breeding potential. Although the genetic correlation between weight and resistance varies across different populations, there is a positive genetic correlation between these traits, supporting the feasibility of multi-trait selection. To enhance genetic accuracy, breeding programs should include more genotyped progeny. These findings also suggest that infection frequency and observation time influence resistance performance and breeding selection, emphasizing the need for a tailored resistance evaluation program to improve breeding efficiency and reduce costs. Full article

Background/Objectives: Genomic prediction is a powerful approach that predicts phenotypic traits from genotypic information, enabling the acceleration of trait improvement in plant breeding. Traditional genomic prediction methods have primarily relied on linear mixed models, such as Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP), and conventional machine learning methods like Support Vector Regression (SVR). Traditional methods are limited in handling high-dimensional data and nonlinear relationships. Thus, deep learning methods have also been applied to genomic prediction in recent years. Methods: We proposed iADEP, Integrated Additive, Dominant, and Epistatic Prediction model based on deep learning. Specifically, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data integrating latent genetic interactions and genome-wide association study results as biological prior knowledge are fused to an SNP embedding block, which is then input to a local encoder. The local encoder is fused with an omic-data-incorporated global decoder through a multi-head attention mechanism, followed by multilayer perceptrons. Results: Firstly, we demonstrated through experiments on four datasets that iADEP outperforms existing methods in genotype-to-phenotype prediction. Secondly, we validated the effectiveness of SNP embedding through ablation experiments. Third, we provided an available module for combining other omics data in iADEP and propose a novel method for fusing them. Fourthly, we explored the impact of feature selection on iADEP performance and conclude that utilizing the full set of SNPs generally provides optimal results. Finally, by altering the partition of training and testing sets, we investigated the differences between transductive learning and inductive learning. Conclusions: iADEP provides a new approach for AI breeding, a promising method that integrates biological prior knowledge and enables combination with other omics data. Full article

The number of ribs (NRs) and the carcass length (CL) are important economic traits. The traits are usually measured after slaughter. To improve the prediction performance of genomic selection (GS) for NRs and CL, one strategy is to integrate the significant loci identified from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data by genome-wide association study (GWAS) into the genomic prediction (GP) model. This study investigated the GP of different genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and Bayesian models using chip genotype data, imputed WGS (iWGS) data and modeling significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in different ways for the GP of NRs and CL in the Suhuai pig population. The prediction accuracy, bias and running time of 15 different GP models were evaluated by 10-fold cross-validation. The prediction accuracy of GBLUP using chip data for NRs and CL was 0.314 ± 0.022 and 0.194 ± 0.040, respectively. For NRs, based on the iWGS data, treating the most significant SNP as fixed effects in the GBLUP model had the highest predictive performance, with a prediction accuracy of 0.528 ± 0.023. For CL, based on the chip data, the model that added all the significant SNPs identified by imputed data by GWAS into the multi-trait GBLUP as the second random additive effect was the highest predictive performance, with a prediction accuracy of 0.305 ± 0.027. This study provides insights into optimizing GP models for small populations with phenotypes that are difficult to measure. Full article

The development of multi-omics has increased the likelihood of further improving genomic prediction (GP) of complex traits. Gene expression data can directly reflect the genotype effect, and thus, they are widely used for GP. Generally, the gene expression data are integrated into multiple random effect models as independent data layers or used to replace genotype data for genomic prediction. In this study, we integrated pedigree, genotype, and gene expression data into the single-step method and investigated the effects of this integration on prediction accuracy. The integrated single-step method improved the genomic prediction accuracy of more than 90% of the 54 traits in the Duroc × Erhualian F₂ pig population dataset. On average, the prediction accuracy of the single-step method integrating gene expression data was 20.6% and 11.8% higher than that of the pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (ABLUP) and genome-based best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) when the weighting factor (w) was set as 0, and it was 5.3% higher than that of the single-step best linear unbiased prediction (ssBLUP) under different w values. Overall, the analyses confirmed that the integration of gene expression data into a single-step method could effectively improve genomic prediction accuracy. Our findings enrich the application of multi-omics data to genomic prediction and provide a valuable reference for integrating multi-omics data into the genomic prediction model. Full article

The need for sufficient reference population data poses a significant challenge in breeding programs aimed at improving pig farming on a small to medium scale. To overcome this hurdle, investigating the advantages of combing reference populations of varying sizes is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). Genomic selection (GS) in populations with limited reference data can be optimized by combining populations of the same breed or related breeds. This study focused on understanding the effect of combing different reference group sizes on the accuracy of GS for determining the growth effectiveness and percentage of lean meat in Yorkshire pigs. Specifically, our study investigated two important traits: the age at 100 kg live weight (AGE100) and the backfat thickness at 100 kg live weight (BF100). This research assessed the efficiency of genomic prediction (GP) using different GEBV models across three Yorkshire populations with varying genetic backgrounds. The GeneSeek 50K GGP porcine high-density array was used for genotyping. A total of 2295 Yorkshire pigs were included, representing three Yorkshire pig populations with different genetic backgrounds—295 from Danish (small) lines from Huaibei City, Anhui Province, 500 from Canadian (medium) lines from Lixin County, Anhui Province, and 1500 from American (large) lines from Shanghai. To evaluate the impact of different population combination scenarios on the GS accuracy, three approaches were explored: (1) combining all three populations for prediction, (2) combining two populations to predict the third, and (3) predicting each population independently. Five GEBV models, including three Bayesian models (BayesA, BayesB, and BayesC), the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model, and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) were implemented through 20 repetitions of five-fold cross-validation (CV). The results indicate that predicting one target population using the other two populations yielded the highest accuracy, providing a novel approach for improving the genomic selection accuracy in Yorkshire pigs. In this study, it was found that using different populations of the same breed to predict small- and medium-sized herds might be effective in improving the GEBV. This investigation highlights the significance of incorporating population combinations in genetic models for predicting the breeding value, particularly for pig farmers confronted with resource limitations. Full article

The selection and breeding of good meat rabbit breeds are fundamental to their industrial development, and genomic selection (GS) can employ genomic information to make up for the shortcomings of traditional phenotype-based breeding methods. For the practical implementation of GS in meat rabbit breeding, it is necessary to assess different marker densities and GS models. Here, we obtained low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (lcWGS) data from 1515 meat rabbits (including parent herd and half-sibling offspring). The specific objectives were (1) to derive a baseline for heritability estimates and genomic predictions based on randomly selected marker densities and (2) to assess the accuracy of genomic predictions for single- and multiple-trait linear mixed models. We found that a marker density of 50 K can be used as a baseline for heritability estimation and genomic prediction. For GS, the multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model results in more accurate predictions for virtually all traits compared to the single-trait model, with improvements greater than 15% for all of them, which may be attributed to the use of information on genetically related traits. In addition, we discovered a positive correlation between the performance of the multi-trait GBLUP and the genetic correlation between the traits. We anticipate that this approach will provide solutions for GS, as well as optimize breeding programs, in meat rabbits. Full article

Genomic prediction combines molecular and phenotypic data in a training population to predict the breeding values of individuals that have only been genotyped. The use of genomic information in breeding programs helps to increase the frequency of favorable alleles in the populations of interest. This study evaluated the performance of BLUP (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction) in predicting resistance to tan spot, spot blotch and Septoria nodorum blotch in synthetic hexaploid wheat. BLUP was implemented in single-trait and multi-trait models with three variations: (1) the pedigree relationship matrix (A-BLUP), (2) the genomic relationship matrix (G-BLUP), and (3) a combination of the two matrices (A+G BLUP). In all three diseases, the A-BLUP model had a lower performance, and the G-BLUP and A+G BLUP were statistically similar (p ≥ 0.05). The prediction accuracy with the single trait was statistically similar (p ≥ 0.05) to the multi-trait accuracy, possibly due to the low correlation of severity between the diseases. Full article

While genomic selection (GS) began revolutionizing plant breeding when it was proposed around 20 years ago, its practical implementation is still challenging as many factors affect its accuracy. One such factor is the choice of the statistical machine learning method. For this reason, we explore the tuning process under a multi-trait framework using the Gaussian kernel with a multi-trait Bayesian Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP) model. We explored three methods of tuning (manual, grid search and Bayesian optimization) using 5 real datasets of breeding programs. We found that using grid search and Bayesian optimization improve between 1.9 and 6.8% the prediction accuracy regarding of using manual tuning. While the improvement in prediction accuracy in some cases can be marginal, it is very important to carry out the tuning process carefully to improve the accuracy of the GS methodology, even though this entails greater computational resources. Full article

Genomic selection (GS) changed the way plant breeders select genotypes. GS takes advantage of phenotypic and genotypic information to training a statistical machine learning model, which is used to predict phenotypic (or breeding) values of new lines for which only genotypic information is available. Therefore, many statistical machine learning methods have been proposed for this task. Multi-trait (MT) genomic prediction models take advantage of correlated traits to improve prediction accuracy. Therefore, some multivariate statistical machine learning methods are popular for GS. In this paper, we compare the prediction performance of three MT methods: the MT genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP), the MT partial least squares (PLS) and the multi-trait random forest (RF) methods. Benchmarking was performed with six real datasets. We found that the three investigated methods produce similar results, but under predictors with genotype (G) and environment (E), that is, E + G, the MT GBLUP achieved superior performance, whereas under predictors E + G + genotype $\times$ environment (GE) and G + GE, random forest achieved the best results. We also found that the best predictions were achieved under the predictors E + G and E + G + GE. Here, we also provide the R code for the implementation of these three statistical machine learning methods in the sparse kernel method (SKM) library, which offers not only options for single-trait prediction with various statistical machine learning methods but also some options for MT predictions that can help to capture improved complex patterns in datasets that are common in genomic selection. Full article

Multiple environment phenotypes may be utilized to implement genomic prediction in plant breeding, while it is unclear about optimal utilization strategies according to its different availability. It is necessary to assess the utilization strategies of genomic prediction models based on different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. Here, we compared the prediction accuracy of three genomic prediction models (genomic prediction model (genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP), and multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (mtGBLUP)) which leveraged diverse information from multiple environment phenotypes using a rice dataset containing 19 agronomic traits in two disparate seasons. We found that the prediction accuracy of genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) was better than the classical genomic prediction model (GBLUP model). The deviation of prediction accuracy of between GBLUP and mtGBLUP or GFBLUP was associated with the phenotypic correlation. In summary, the genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) demonstrated better prediction accuracy. In addition, we could utilize different genomic prediction strategies according to different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. Full article

One-step genomic selection is a method for improving the reliability of the breeding value estimation. This study aimed to compare the reliability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP), single-trait and multitrait models, and the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian methods. Data were collected from the production performance records of 2207 Xinjiang Brown cattle in Xinjiang from 1983 to 2018. A cross test was designed to calculate the genetic parameters and reliability of the breeding value of 305 daily milk yield (305 dMY), milk fat yield (MFY), milk protein yield (MPY), and somatic cell score (SCS) of Xinjiang Brown cattle. The heritability of 305 dMY, MFY, MPY, and SCS estimated using the REML and Bayesian multitrait models was approximately 0.39 (0.02), 0.40 (0.03), 0.49 (0.02), and 0.07 (0.02), respectively. The heritability and estimated breeding value (EBV) and the reliability of milk production traits of these cattle calculated based on PBLUP and ssGBLUP using the multitrait model REML and Bayesian methods were higher than those of the single-trait model REML method; the ssGBLUP method was significantly better than the PBLUP method. The reliability of the estimated breeding value can be improved from 0.9% to 3.6%, and the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for the genotyped population can reach 83%. Therefore, the genetic evaluation of the multitrait model is better than that of the single-trait model. Thus, genomic selection can be applied to small population varieties such as Xinjiang Brown cattle, in improving the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value. Full article

To date, it is not known whether animal breeding values in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) can be estimated using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) generated from new high-throughput genotyping by sequencing platforms. The principal aim of the present study was to assess the genomic prediction accuracy for growth traits, survival, cannibalism, and disease resistance against Streptococcus iniae in this species L. calcarifer. Additionally, this study attempted to identify markers associated with the five traits studied as well as to understand if the genotype data can be used to estimate genetic parameters for these complex traits. The genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP) method was used to analyze 11,084 SNPs and showed that the prediction accuracies for growth traits (weight and length) were high (0.67–0.75). By contrast, these estimates for survival were low (0.25). Multi-locus mixed model analyses identified four SNPs significantly associated with body weight (p < 5 × 10⁻⁸ or −log10 p ≥ 5). There were, however, no significant associations detected for other traits. Similarly, the SNP heritability was moderate, while the estimates for other traits were approximated to zero and not significant. Genetic correlations between body weight and standard length were close to unity. Collectively, the results obtained from this study suggest that genotyping by sequencing platforms can provide informative DNA markers to conduct genome-wide association analysis, estimation of genetic parameters, and evaluation of genomic prediction accuracy for complex traits in Asian seabass. Full article

Genomic selection has been widely used in terrestrial animals but has had limited application in aquaculture due to relatively high genotyping costs. Genomic information has an important role in improving the prediction accuracy of breeding values, especially for traits that are difficult or expensive to measure. The purposes of this study were to (i) further evaluate the use of genomic information to improve prediction accuracies of breeding values from, (ii) compare different prediction methods (BayesA, BayesCπ and GBLUP) on prediction accuracies in our field data, and (iii) investigate the effects of different SNP marker densities on prediction accuracies of traits in the Portuguese oyster (Crassostrea angulata). The traits studied are all of economic importance and included morphometric traits (shell length, shell width, shell depth, shell weight), edibility traits (tenderness, taste, moisture content), and disease traits (Polydora sp. and Marteilioides chungmuensis). A total of 18,849 single nucleotide polymorphisms were obtained from genotyping by sequencing and used to estimate genetic parameters (heritability and genetic correlation) and the prediction accuracy of genomic selection for these traits. Multi-locus mixed model analysis indicated high estimates of heritability for edibility traits; 0.44 for moisture content, 0.59 for taste, and 0.72 for tenderness. The morphometric traits, shell length, shell width, shell depth and shell weight had estimated genomic heritabilities ranging from 0.28 to 0.55. The genomic heritabilities were relatively low for the disease related traits: Polydora sp. prevalence (0.11) and M. chungmuensis (0.10). Genomic correlations between whole weight and other morphometric traits were from moderate to high and positive (0.58–0.90). However, unfavourably positive genomic correlations were observed between whole weight and the disease traits (0.35–0.37). The genomic best linear unbiased prediction method (GBLUP) showed slightly higher accuracy for the traits studied (0.240–0.794) compared with both BayesA and BayesCπ methods but these differences were not significant. In addition, there is a large potential for using low-density SNP markers for genomic selection in this population at a number of 3000 SNPs. Therefore, there is the prospect to improve morphometric, edibility and disease related traits using genomic information in this species. Full article

The performance of genomic prediction (GP) on genetically correlated traits can be improved through an interdependence multi-trait model under a multi-environment context. In this study, a panel of 237 soft facultative wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines was evaluated to compare single- and multi-trait models for predicting grain yield (GY), harvest index (HI), spike fertility (SF), and thousand grain weight (TGW). The panel was phenotyped in two locations and two years in Florida under drought and moderately drought stress conditions, while the genotyping was performed using 27,957 genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) makers. Five predictive models including Multi-environment Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (MGBLUP), Bayesian Multi-trait Multi-environment (BMTME), Bayesian Multi-output Regressor Stacking (BMORS), Single-trait Multi-environment Deep Learning (SMDL), and Multi-trait Multi-environment Deep Learning (MMDL) were compared. Across environments, the multi-trait statistical model (BMTME) was superior to the multi-trait DL model for prediction accuracy in most scenarios, but the DL models were comparable to the statistical models for response to selection. The multi-trait model also showed 5 to 22% more genetic gain compared to the single-trait model across environment reflected by the response to selection. Overall, these results suggest that multi-trait genomic prediction can be an efficient strategy for economically important yield component related traits in soft wheat. Full article

Achieving optimal predictive ability is key to increasing the relevance of implementing genomic selection (GS) approaches in plant breeding programs. The potential of an item-based collaborative filtering (IBCF) recommender system in the context of multi-trait, multi-environment GS has been explored. Different GS scenarios for IBCF were evaluated for a diverse population of winter wheat lines adapted to the Pacific Northwest region of the US. Predictions across years through cross-validations resulted in improved predictive ability when there is a high correlation between environments. Using multiple spectral traits collected from high-throughput phenotyping resulted in better GS accuracies for grain yield (GY) compared to using only single traits for predictions. Trait adjustments through various Bayesian regression models using genomic information from SNP markers was the most effective in achieving improved accuracies for GY, heading date, and plant height among the GS scenarios evaluated. Bayesian LASSO had the highest predictive ability compared to other models for phenotypic trait adjustments. IBCF gave competitive accuracies compared to a genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP) model for predicting different traits. Overall, an IBCF approach could be used as an alternative to traditional prediction models for important target traits in wheat breeding programs. Full article