Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (325)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = marijuana

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 568 KB  
Article
Psychological Distress Mediates the Relationship Between Perceived Social Isolation and Medical vs. Recreational Marijuana Use Among Adults in the United States
by Derek S. Falk, Christian E. Vazquez and Swasati Handique
Psychiatry Int. 2026, 7(2), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint7020055 - 4 Mar 2026
Viewed by 274
Abstract
Marijuana use in the United States (U.S.) has diversified alongside expanding legalization, yet little is known about the psychosocial factors that distinguish medical from recreational use. This study examined whether psychological distress mediates the association between perceived social isolation (i.e., loneliness) and marijuana [...] Read more.
Marijuana use in the United States (U.S.) has diversified alongside expanding legalization, yet little is known about the psychosocial factors that distinguish medical from recreational use. This study examined whether psychological distress mediates the association between perceived social isolation (i.e., loneliness) and marijuana use type among U.S. adults. We analyzed cross-sectional, nationally representative data from the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS, cycle 7). Marijuana use was categorized as medical (including medical and both medical/recreational) versus recreational. Perceived social isolation was measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Social Isolation t-score, and psychological distress was assessed with the Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-4. Survey-weighted descriptive analyses and a weighted structural equation mediation model accounting for the complex sampling design were conducted. Medical marijuana users reported significantly higher levels of psychological distress and perceived social isolation than recreational users. Greater social isolation was strongly associated with higher psychological distress, and higher distress was associated with a greater likelihood of medical (vs. recreational) marijuana use. The indirect effect of social isolation on marijuana use type through psychological distress was statistically significant, while the direct effect of social isolation was not significant after accounting for distress. Overall, greater perceived social isolation predicted medical marijuana use primarily through elevated psychological distress. These findings suggest that medical marijuana use among U.S. adults may reflect coping with psychological distress linked to social disconnection, underscoring the importance of integrating mental health and social context into clinical and public health approaches to cannabis use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior in Substance Use and Addiction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 287 KB  
Article
Safety Implications of Cannabis Use: Rates, Characteristics, and Circumstances of Cannabis-Related Deaths in New Zealand, 2012–2016
by Rebbecca Lilley, Bronwen McNoe and Gabrielle Davie
Safety 2026, 12(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/safety12020032 - 1 Mar 2026
Viewed by 288
Abstract
Cannabis is the most-used psychoactive drug in Aotearoa—New Zealand (NZ); recreational use remains illegal, while medicinal use was legalized in 2020. Cannabis use is associated with increased risk of injury; however, there is little known on the causes and circumstances of cannabis-related fatal [...] Read more.
Cannabis is the most-used psychoactive drug in Aotearoa—New Zealand (NZ); recreational use remains illegal, while medicinal use was legalized in 2020. Cannabis use is associated with increased risk of injury; however, there is little known on the causes and circumstances of cannabis-related fatal injuries. This retrospective population study utilized coronial case files to describe the contribution and circumstances of cannabis-related fatal injuries in NZ. Between 2012 and 2016, cannabis was reported in 273 of 3599 unintentional/assault injury deaths (1.32 deaths per 100,000 person-years, 95% CI 1.17, 1.49). High-risk groups included males aged 15–44 years, Indigenous Māori, and those in deprived areas, for whom higher rates of post mortem testing were conducted. Cannabis-related fatalities mainly resulted from road crashes and multi-drug poisonings with concomitant alcohol use common, especially in traffic crashes on public roads (49% of concomitant use). Cannabis use was mainly observed in the decedent (n = 256, 94%). One in five deaths involved a worker, either as a user or as a bystander to another’s use. Coronial files identified important opportunities for safety countermeasures targeting cannabis use among drivers and its concomitant use with alcohol. Improved coverage of post mortem testing could address data limitations, including biased testing patterns and missing medical use. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 337 KB  
Article
Cannabis and Psychedelics Among U.S. Young Adults: Use, Messaging Exposure, Perceptions, and Legalization Support
by Carla J. Berg, Cassidy R. LoParco, Darcey M. McCready, Laura C. Schubel, Patricia A. Cavazos-Rehg, Erin Kasson, Shriya Thakkar, Diane M. Ndisebuye and Y. Tony Yang
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2026, 23(2), 255; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23020255 - 17 Feb 2026
Viewed by 422
Abstract
This study assessed the correlates of cannabis and psychedelic use and legalization support among young adults in the United States (US). Using 2025 data among adults ages 18–34 (n = 3227), we assessed cannabis and psychedelic message exposure and perceptions, mental health [...] Read more.
This study assessed the correlates of cannabis and psychedelic use and legalization support among young adults in the United States (US). Using 2025 data among adults ages 18–34 (n = 3227), we assessed cannabis and psychedelic message exposure and perceptions, mental health symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [PHQ-4]), and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in relation to past-6-month cannabis use (40.5%), past-year psychedelic use (11.9%), and legalization support. Relative to cannabis, psychedelics showed less legalization support, promotional and risk-message exposure, and social acceptability and higher perceived addictiveness and harm (p’s < 0.001). Factors associated with cannabis use and greater legalization support included: lower perceived addictiveness (aOR = 0.88, CI = 0.83–0.93; B = −0.04, SE = 0.01) and harm (aOR = 0.75, CI = 0.71–0.80; B = −0.16, SE = 0.01), higher social acceptability (aOR = 1.25, CI = 1.19–1.33; B = 0.19, SE = 0.01), and higher PHQ-4 (aOR = 1.04, CI = 1.01–1.07); more ACEs (aOR = 1.10, CI = 1.06–1.14) and more promotional (aOR = 1.08, CI = 1.01–1.17) and risk-message exposure (aOR = 1.27, CI = 1.17–1.39) were associated with use. Factors associated with psychedelic use and greater legalization support included: more promotional-message exposure (aOR = 1.61, CI = 1.36–1.91; B = 0.09, SE = 0.04), lower addictiveness (aOR = 0.87, CI = 0.78–0.97; B = −0.03, SE = 0.02) and harm (aOR = 0.74, CI = 0.66–0.82; B = −0.19, SE = 0.02), higher acceptability (aOR = 1.59, CI = 1.47–1.73; B = 0.15, SE = 0.01), and higher PHQ-4 (aOR = 1.06, CI = 1.02–1.11; B = 0.02, SE = 0.01); more risk-message exposure (aOR = 1.29, CI = 1.08–1.54) and ACEs (aOR = 1.15, CI = 1.09–1.21) were associated with use. Perceptions and mental health may influence cannabis and psychedelic use and legalization support, and message exposure may be particularly relevant in shaping psychedelic use and legalization support. Thus, information is crucial to ensure population understanding of the risks, benefits, and overall population impacts of cannabis and psychedelic use and legalization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Behavioral and Mental Health)
21 pages, 20265 KB  
Article
Analysis of Marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) Cuttings: Morphological and Colorimetric Traits as Predictors for Optimization of Vegetative Reproduction
by Laura G. A. Espósito, Camila Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira, Heitor Mancini Teixeira and Derly Silva
Plants 2026, 15(3), 440; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030440 - 31 Jan 2026
Viewed by 1145
Abstract
Marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) has a great economic potential due to its phytotherapeutic properties. Its propagation, however, faces numerous challenges due to the limited availability of standardized technical protocols for the crop. Vegetative propagation represents a, or even the, viable method for [...] Read more.
Marijuana (Cannabis sativa L.) has a great economic potential due to its phytotherapeutic properties. Its propagation, however, faces numerous challenges due to the limited availability of standardized technical protocols for the crop. Vegetative propagation represents a, or even the, viable method for multiplying the genetically identical individuals while preserving their phytochemical profile, at lower costs and with shorter production times. This study investigated the morphological and colorimetric attributes associated with vegetative propagation success, aiming to develop sustainable cultivation strategies. Four cutting lengths (5, 10, 15 and 20 cm) were evaluated after 21 days of rooting, considering fresh mass, basal diameter, presence of apical meristem, number of root primordia, root length, and foliar and stem color parameters. Logistic regressions indicated that longer cuttings (p = 0.0101), greater fresh mass (p = 0.073) and the presence of apical meristem (p = 0.065), as well as greener leaves (p = 0.089), were positively associated with rooting probability (p < 0.10). Positive correlations between morphological and colorimetric variables were confirmed by Principal Component Analysis, with the first two principal components explaining 31.2% of the total variance in the dataset. The results provide support for the development of more efficient and low-cost vegetative propagation protocols, promoting uniformity and autonomy in local cutting production of marijuana. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Development and Morphogenesis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 461 KB  
Article
Effects of Cannabis on Multiple Visual Parameters and Self-Perceived Eyesight: A Cross-Sectional Study in Cannabis Users in Morocco
by Karima Raoui, Elmhedi Wakrim, Abdelmounaim Baslam, René Combe, Sarah Michaud, Hajar Gebrati, Mohamed Cherkaoui and Chait Abderrahman
Psychoactives 2026, 5(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/psychoactives5010003 - 18 Jan 2026
Viewed by 590
Abstract
Cannabis is one of the most common intoxicants used worldwide. Cannabis is widely consumed worldwide and can lead to visual alterations. However, most of the available information on its effects comes from studies conducted in developed countries, while data remain limited in developing [...] Read more.
Cannabis is one of the most common intoxicants used worldwide. Cannabis is widely consumed worldwide and can lead to visual alterations. However, most of the available information on its effects comes from studies conducted in developed countries, while data remain limited in developing regions such as Morocco, despite its significant role in cannabis cultivation. The aim of this study was to explore multiple visual parameters and self-perceived eyesight in cannabis users in Morocco. A cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2022 and April 2023 in Marrakesh, Morocco, in cannabis consumers. Data collection was performed in two phases. First a hetero-administrated questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographics, intoxicant consumption habit information, and eye health information. Then, several visual acuity tests were performed, including a preliminary examination, a visual function assessment, and an eye health assessment. Ninety-five cannabis users participated in this study. The majority were single (62.1%) males (87.4%). All lived in the Marrakesh-Safi region (100%), and most had daily activities such as having a job or being a student (77.9%). Most had vision conditions like astigmatism or myopia (83.4%). The majority had multiple addictions (66.5%), mainly to tobacco (43.7%). Hashish was the main cannabis type used (57.9%), and smoked cannabis was the principal mode of consumption (94.7%). Many had a family history of cannabis addiction (58.9%). Day light sensitivity (66.3%) and appearance of eye symptoms after cannabis use (90.5%) were declared by the majority. In most cases, no impact on far or near vision or vision impairment due to cannabis use were declared. Our results showed that using cannabis could have significant adverse effects on visual functions. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 372 KB  
Review
Cannabis, Extracts, and Individual Phytocannabinoids—All the Same or Substantially Different? A Call for Better Characterization of Cannabis Products
by Gerhard Nahler
Psychoactives 2026, 5(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/psychoactives5010001 - 4 Jan 2026
Viewed by 607
Abstract
Cannabis and its derivatives are increasingly popular. The public perception of “cannabis” is commonly related to abuse potential with no sharp distinction to “marijuana”, “cannabinoids”, “hemp”, and cannabis derivatives. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)—rich cannabis (“marijuana”), needs to be distinguished from hemp and cannabidiol (CBD)—rich; [...] Read more.
Cannabis and its derivatives are increasingly popular. The public perception of “cannabis” is commonly related to abuse potential with no sharp distinction to “marijuana”, “cannabinoids”, “hemp”, and cannabis derivatives. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)—rich cannabis (“marijuana”), needs to be distinguished from hemp and cannabidiol (CBD)—rich; the former is psychotomimetic, while the latter is not, and it is increasingly used as a “health product”; the phytochemical composition makes the difference. However, this is still inadequately addressed. Without a detailed characterization of the components and effects conclusions cannot be generalized and are only applicable to the product used. Cannabis varieties have a highly variable phytochemical composition; the effects cannot always be attributed solely to the “main cannabinoids.” Growth conditions and processing methods also have a significant influence on the properties of the final product, even when the same cannabis variety is used. Therefore, the few comparative studies between extracts and the corresponding pure cannabinoids often produce conflicting results, as numerous preclinical and clinical examples demonstrate. They also show how little attention is paid to the phytochemical profile, even in scientific publications. Both in scientific research and consumer products, the phytochemical profile beyond the main cannabinoids should be disclosed in detail, especially since new cannabis products containing semi-synthetic CBD derivatives have recently entered the market. Full article
12 pages, 292 KB  
Article
Determinants of Youth Exposure to Nicotine-Containing Aerosols: Findings from a College Survey
by Chesmi Kumbalatara, Lindsey Johnson, Matthew MacArthur, Meungguk Park and Wasantha Jayawardene
J. Xenobiot. 2026, 16(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16010003 - 19 Dec 2025
Viewed by 547
Abstract
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDSs) expose users to nicotine, volatile organic chemicals, and ultrafine particles that pose emerging toxicological concerns for youth. The prevalence of vaping among college students quadrupled between 2017 and 2019. The Vaping Initiation, Continuation, Termination, or Resumption in Youth [...] Read more.
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDSs) expose users to nicotine, volatile organic chemicals, and ultrafine particles that pose emerging toxicological concerns for youth. The prevalence of vaping among college students quadrupled between 2017 and 2019. The Vaping Initiation, Continuation, Termination, or Resumption in Youth (VICTORY) study explored a random sample of 543 undergraduate students at a Midwestern university, using an anonymous online survey, for factors associated with initiation and regular inhalation of vape-derived aerosols. Results showed that 50% of participants had ever used a vape, and 67% had used tobacco, vape, or marijuana. The mean age of first use of tobacco was 15.16 years, significantly younger than the mean ages for vaping (16.33) and marijuana (16.60). There were no significant gender differences in ENDS use, although more males reported tobacco as their first substance (18% difference). Notably, 40% reported non-alcoholic substance or alcohol use in the past 30 days. Decision-tree analysis revealed complex relationships between vaping aerosols, tobacco, alcohol use, marijuana use, and living arrangements. Logistic regression identified key predictors of regular vaping, including higher school year, lower household income, employment status, and younger age at first use. These findings highlight the need for tailored public health interventions and continued monitoring to address the growing trend of youth vaping. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

36 pages, 2335 KB  
Review
Medical Marijuana and Treatment Personalization: The Role of Genetics and Epigenetics in Response to THC and CBD
by Małgorzata Kalak, Anna Brylak-Błaszków, Łukasz Błaszków and Tomasz Kalak
Genes 2025, 16(12), 1487; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16121487 - 12 Dec 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1370
Abstract
Personalizing therapy using medical marijuana (MM) is based on understanding the pharmacogenomics (PGx) and drug–drug interactions (DDIs) involved, as well as identifying potential epigenetic risk markers. In this work, the evidence regarding the role of variants in phase I (CYP2C9, CYP2C19 [...] Read more.
Personalizing therapy using medical marijuana (MM) is based on understanding the pharmacogenomics (PGx) and drug–drug interactions (DDIs) involved, as well as identifying potential epigenetic risk markers. In this work, the evidence regarding the role of variants in phase I (CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4/5) and II (UGT1A9/UGT2B7) genes, transporters (ABCB1), and selected neurobiological factors (AKT1/COMT) in differentiating responses to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) has been reviewed. Data indicating enzyme inhibition by CBD and the possibility of phenoconversion were also considered, which highlights the importance of a dynamic interpretation of PGx in the context of current pharmacotherapy. Simultaneously, the results of epigenetic studies (DNA methylation, histone modifications, and ncRNA) in various tissues and developmental windows were summarized, including the reversibility of some signatures in sperm after a period of abstinence and the persistence of imprints in blood. Based on this, practical frameworks for personalization are proposed: the integration of PGx testing, DDI monitoring, and phenotype correction into clinical decision support systems (CDS), supplemented by cautious dose titration and safety monitoring. The culmination is a proposal of tables and diagrams that organize the most important PGx–DDI–epigenetics relationships and facilitate the elimination of content repetition in the text. The paper identifies areas of implementation maturity (e.g., CYP2C9/THC, CBD-CYP2C19/clobazam, AKT1, and acute psychotomimetic effects) and those requiring replication (e.g., multigenic analgesic signals), indicating directions for future research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Epigenomics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 856 KB  
Review
The Colombian Medical Cannabis Paradox: A Scoping Review of Structural Barriers and Health Inequity
by Olga Patricia Marín Arroyave and Pedro León Cruz
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(12), 1792; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22121792 - 26 Nov 2025
Viewed by 590
Abstract
Background: Law 1787 of 2016 established Colombia’s medical cannabis framework, intended as a public policy to improve health equity by guaranteeing access and promoting inclusive development. This scoping review analyzes this policy’s implementation as a social determinant of health, mapping the literature on [...] Read more.
Background: Law 1787 of 2016 established Colombia’s medical cannabis framework, intended as a public policy to improve health equity by guaranteeing access and promoting inclusive development. This scoping review analyzes this policy’s implementation as a social determinant of health, mapping the literature on the gap between its legislative promise and its real-world impact. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines across six electronic databases, selecting peer-reviewed articles (2016–2025) that analyzed the regulatory, socioeconomic, and healthcare factors acting as structural determinants in Colombia. Results: From 122 initial records, 10 studies were included. The analysis reveals a systemic paradox: the policy’s implementation created structural barriers that undermine its equity goals. Findings highlight three gaps: (1) Inequitable Access: High costs and lack of medical knowledge create socioeconomic, rather than clinical, barriers for patients. (2) Socioeconomic Marginalization: The market model favors corporate capture, systematically excluding small-scale rural producers. (3) Policy-Driven Inequity: The regulatory framework’s complexity reinforces these inequities. Conclusions: Colombia’s medical cannabis policy implementation functions as a social determinant that produces health inequity. To align with public health objectives, policy reform must dismantle these identified structural barriers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Global Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 482 KB  
Article
Impact of Medications and Marijuana Use on Hyposalivation and Xerostomia in Adults
by Carter Gehlken, Moni Ahmadian and Neamat Hassan Abubakr
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(11), 1700; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22111700 - 11 Nov 2025
Viewed by 910
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Hyposalivation is a prevalent yet underrecognized factor contributing to oral health deterioration, often influenced by systemic disease, medication use, and recreational drug exposure. With rising use of mental health and cardiovascular medications, as well as increasing marijuana use among younger populations, there [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Hyposalivation is a prevalent yet underrecognized factor contributing to oral health deterioration, often influenced by systemic disease, medication use, and recreational drug exposure. With rising use of mental health and cardiovascular medications, as well as increasing marijuana use among younger populations, there is a need to assess real-world data on xerostomia and hyposalivation prevalence and associated risk factors. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of hyposalivation and xerostomia, and its etiological associations among adult patients at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) School of Dental Medicine Clinics. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic health record (EHR) data from 1600 randomly selected patients aged 30 years and older, treated between 1 January 2014, and 31 May 2023. Data on demographics, medical and social history, medication use, and oral health status were extracted. Hyposalivation was identified via chart review, and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze associated risk factors. Results: Hyposalivation and xerostomia were identified in 705 patients (44.06%). Marijuana use was the strongest independent predictor across all age groups (RR = 3.10, p < 0.05). Among patients aged 30–35, use of antihypertensive (OR = 3.05, p < 0.05) and mental health medications (OR = 1.81, p < 0.05) were significantly associated with hyposalivation. A strong correlation was also found between hyposalivation and elevated caries risk (χ2 = 205.99, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Hyposalivation and xerostomia are increasingly observed in younger adults, linked to pharmacological and behavioral factors. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 277 KB  
Article
Associations Between Electronic Vapor Product Use and Prescription Opioid Misuse Among High School Students in the United States; A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis
by Killian M. Pache, Lionel Kameni and Cornelius B. Groenewald
Children 2025, 12(11), 1476; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12111476 - 1 Nov 2025
Viewed by 461
Abstract
Study objective: Electronic vapor product (EVP) use remains prevalent among adolescents in the United States. EVP use may be associated with high-risk substance use behaviors. This study investigates the association between current EVP use and current opioid misuse in high school students. Methods: [...] Read more.
Study objective: Electronic vapor product (EVP) use remains prevalent among adolescents in the United States. EVP use may be associated with high-risk substance use behaviors. This study investigates the association between current EVP use and current opioid misuse in high school students. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2021 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) (n = 7471). We first examined the prevalence rates of current prescription opioid misuse between participants ages 14 to 19 who reported any EVP use compared to those who did not report any EVP use. We conducted an adjusted Poisson regression analysis to determine whether EVP use was associated with prescription opioid misuse after controlling for multiple variables, including age, biological sex, race, ethnicity, alcohol use, other tobacco use, marijuana use, and depressive symptoms. Results: Among participants, 17.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 15.4–19.1%) reported current EVP use. The prevalence of current opioid misuse was higher in the group of students who use EVPs (13.3%) as compared to students who do not use EVPs (3.2%) (p < 0.0001). Compared to participants who did not use EVPs, those with EVP use had an 80% greater prevalence of opioid misuse, after adjusting in regression analyses (adjusted prevalence rate ratio: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.4–2.3, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the significantly increased prevalence of opioid misuse among this population and the need to educate adolescents about the additional risks associated with nicotine and EVP use. Longitudinal studies are needed to test causal relationships and better understand the biobehavioral mechanisms that connect EVP use and opioid misuse. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Global Pediatric Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 303 KB  
Article
Exploring Pathways from Childhood Adversity to Substance Use in Young Adults
by Liudas Vincentas Sinkevicius, Sandra Sakalauskaite, Mykolas Simas Poskus, Rasa Pilkauskaite Valickiene and Danielius Serapinas
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(11), 1608; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22111608 - 22 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1008
Abstract
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are recognized risk factors for later substance use. Yet, data remain scarce—particularly regarding the differentiated effects of specific types of ACEs and their distinct associations with various psychoactive substances. The current study is one of the first in Lithuania [...] Read more.
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are recognized risk factors for later substance use. Yet, data remain scarce—particularly regarding the differentiated effects of specific types of ACEs and their distinct associations with various psychoactive substances. The current study is one of the first in Lithuania to explore the associations between specific ACEs and psychoactive substance use in young adulthood (ages 18–29). This cross-sectional study included a total of 709 participants who completed an online survey. ACEs were measured using a combination of adapted ACEs items and the MACE questionnaire. Substance use was assessed using self-reported instruments: CUDIT-R (cannabis), AUDIT (alcohol), ASSIST (heavy psychoactive substances), and nicotine use. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was chosen to examine predictive relationships. Results revealed that experiences of sexual abuse and physical maltreatment in childhood predicted higher levels of alcohol use in young adulthood. Sexual abuse was positively associated with nicotine, cannabis, and heavy psychoactive substance use, while witnessing interpersonal violence was only associated with higher nicotine use. However, verbal abuse showed significant negative associations across several substance categories. No significant associations were found between family addiction history and substance use. The absence of an important relationship between family history of addiction and substance use indicates that genetic factors may be less decisive than environmental or psychosocial conditions. The main findings of this study are that ACEs are not qualitatively equivalent to one another, so it is worth examining them separately, rather than summing them. Furthermore, based on the negative associations with verbal abuse and the generally statistically negative associations, we can assume that ACEs may not be the most important factors increasing substance use. Further studies should look for other factors that influence substance use. Full article
14 pages, 358 KB  
Article
Concerns, Beliefs and Attitudes of Pharmacists About Medical Cannabis Use in Poland
by Piotr Merks, Jameason Cameron, Justyna Kazmierczak, Artur Białkowski, Dariusz Świetlik, Mariola Borowska, Waldemar Wierzba, Urszula Bołkun-Skórnicka, Daniel Śliż, Eliza Blicharska, Jarosław Fedorowski, Regis Vaillancourt and Urszula Religioni
Healthcare 2025, 13(21), 2657; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212657 - 22 Oct 2025
Viewed by 2216
Abstract
Introduction: The global use of medical cannabis is steadily increasing. In Poland, medical cannabis was legalised in 2017; however, its use remains limited and not widely integrated into clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the attitudes, concerns, and beliefs of pharmacists and [...] Read more.
Introduction: The global use of medical cannabis is steadily increasing. In Poland, medical cannabis was legalised in 2017; however, its use remains limited and not widely integrated into clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the attitudes, concerns, and beliefs of pharmacists and pharmacy students regarding the medical use of cannabis. Methods: A study was conducted in 2021 among 422 pharmacists and pharmacy students in Poland, primarily working in community pharmacies. Data were collected using a custom-designed questionnaire addressing beliefs, concerns, and professional experiences related to medical cannabis. Results: Nearly half of the respondents (48.9%) believe that cannabis should be used exclusively for medical purposes, while 47.6% support its use for both medical and recreational purposes following legalisation. A substantial majority (over 90%) consider cannabis effective for treating adults, with nearly 70% acknowledging its potential for treating children. Over 66% of respondents feel comfortable discussing medical cannabis with patients; however, fewer are confident in providing detailed advice about its use. The findings also highlight concerns about the long-term effects and potential legal implications of dispensing medical cannabis. Conclusions: Pharmacists and pharmacy students in Poland demonstrate openness to the medical use of cannabis and recognise its therapeutic potential. However, to enhance their ability to advise patients effectively, targeted educational initiatives are needed. These should focus on the clinical applications, safety, and long-term effects of cannabis, alongside strategies for addressing patient concerns and ensuring responsible usage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patient Experience and the Quality of Health Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 399 KB  
Review
Perioperative Repercussions of Cannabis Use—Implications for GI Endoscopy Sedation
by Basavana Goudra and Michael Green
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(19), 7028; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14197028 - 4 Oct 2025
Viewed by 3147
Abstract
The legalization of cannabis in multiple U.S. states and several other countries, along with its increasing social acceptance across diverse demographic and socioeconomic groups, has led to a growing number of patients presenting for interventional procedures with a history of cannabis use. Although [...] Read more.
The legalization of cannabis in multiple U.S. states and several other countries, along with its increasing social acceptance across diverse demographic and socioeconomic groups, has led to a growing number of patients presenting for interventional procedures with a history of cannabis use. Although anesthetic and sedation-related implications may be less pronounced than in major surgery, they remain clinically relevant and warrant careful consideration. Key factors include acute intoxication, chronic use, and cannabis use disorder. Cannabis users often require higher—and sometimes unpredictable—doses of propofol and other sedatives. Inhalational use is associated with airway hyperreactivity, increasing the risk of bronchospasm and, in severe cases, life-threatening laryngospasm. Acute intoxication may also impair the patient’s ability to provide informed consent. Cardiovascular manifestations, including tachycardia, hypertension, and an elevated risk of myocardial infarction, may occur depending on the timing and extent of recent cannabis exposure. Although these effects are unlikely to cause major complications during routine screening colonoscopy or diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy, advanced therapeutic procedures may pose significant challenges for sedation providers. This narrative review summarizes the chemistry, pharmacology, and sedation-related implications of cannabis use in patients undergoing sedation requiring interventional procedures, with a specific focus on GI endoscopy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in General and Regional Anesthesia)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 278 KB  
Review
Evidence for Cannabidiol as a Medication for the Treatment of Neurological, Psychiatric, Behavioral and Substance Use Disorders in Adolescents
by Jennifer A. Ross, William Riccardelli, James Robitaille and Sharon Levy
Adolescents 2025, 5(4), 54; https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents5040054 - 30 Sep 2025
Viewed by 3365
Abstract
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a chemical produced by the cannabis plant that acts as an allosteric modulator of cannabinoid receptors resulting in non-competitive receptor antagonism in the central nervous system. This mechanism of action leads to anti-convulsant, anti-anxiety, and analgesic properties with minimal psycho-activity, [...] Read more.
Cannabidiol (CBD) is a chemical produced by the cannabis plant that acts as an allosteric modulator of cannabinoid receptors resulting in non-competitive receptor antagonism in the central nervous system. This mechanism of action leads to anti-convulsant, anti-anxiety, and analgesic properties with minimal psycho-activity, which has led to significant interest in the use of CBD as a medication. Legislation around cannabis has changed in recent years, with many states permitting the use of CBD-based products as “medication” without approval from the Federal Drug Administration. This has led to a proliferation of products with associated marketing claims that are often unsubstantiated. This review summarizes the evidence for cannabidiol as a medical treatment, focusing on epilepsy, mental health, behavioral and substance use disorders occurring in pediatric and adolescent populations for which information is available. CBD preparations have been approved by the FDA to treat epilepsy in childhood; no other indications currently exist, and the literature remains inconclusive. Few adverse effects related to CBD use have been reported. However, endogenous cannabinoids play an important role in guiding brain development, and the long-term impact of modulating the endocannabinoid system during periods of brain growth during childhood and adolescence is unknown. While there is excitement about the potential for the development of CBD medications, currently, there is very limited information about the long-term safety of CBD, especially in children and adolescents, and caution is recommended regarding the use of unregulated, unapproved CBD preparations that are currently available over the counter. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop