Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (39)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = mandibular implant overdenture

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 12320 KiB  
Case Report
Implant Prosthetic Rehabilitation in a Mandible Osteosarcoma Patient: A Clinical Report
by Lady Arbelaez-Bonozo, Laura Luis-Sanchez, Elena Oliva-Ferrusola, Carlos Fernandez-Morales, Manuel Albornoz-Cabello, Jose-Luis Gutierrez-Perez and Daniel Torres-Lagares
Prosthesis 2025, 7(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7010022 - 19 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 938
Abstract
Introduction: Generally, after an oral oncological therapeutic process in which, unfortunately, surgery plays a fundamental role, a reconstructive and rehabilitative procedure should be initiated, seeking as far as possible to recover the patient’s vital functions (mastication, aesthetics, and phonetics). Case report: We present [...] Read more.
Introduction: Generally, after an oral oncological therapeutic process in which, unfortunately, surgery plays a fundamental role, a reconstructive and rehabilitative procedure should be initiated, seeking as far as possible to recover the patient’s vital functions (mastication, aesthetics, and phonetics). Case report: We present the case of a patient who successfully underwent treatment for mandibular sarcoma. After a disease-free period of one year, following oncological treatment, an intervention was performed for the insertion of dental implants into the fibula to subsequently rehabilitate the patient prosthetically. There were several challenges, including free-end edentulous space in the lower jaw with a depth of 18 mm on peri-implant tissues consisting of osteoseptocutaneous skin graft, hypotonic perioral musculature, and high aesthetic expectations of the patient. An overdenture with a titanium milled bar substructure with retentive prosthetic components was chosen for treatment. This implant-supported removable prosthesis was selected to facilitate cleaning, since the patient did not maintain oral hygiene habits. The patient was educated on using and handling the prosthesis, and the treatment objectives were achieved (to restore aesthetics and masticatory function). Conclusions: Removable prostheses are a valid alternative for oncologic patients and patients with unfavorable conditions for more complex implant-supported rehabilitation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Oral Cancer Patients)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 8565 KiB  
Article
Mandibular Fractures in Edentulous Patients with Bone Atrophy and Osseointegrated Dental Implants: Therapeutic Management in a Case Series
by Marta Benito Anguita, Jose Luis del Castillo Pardo de Vera, Saad Khayat, Ana María López López, Javier González Martín Moro, Gema Arenas de Frutos, Raúl Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Marta Pampín Martínez, Estela Gómez Larren, Carlos Navarro Cuéllar, Jose Luis Cebrián Carretero and Ignacio Navarro Cuéllar
Medicina 2024, 60(11), 1835; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60111835 - 8 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1802
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This research describes the management of mandibular fractures in edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles and implant-retained overdentures, exploring etiologies and treatment options. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study (January 2010–December 2023) was conducted on six patients from two hospitals [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: This research describes the management of mandibular fractures in edentulous patients with atrophic mandibles and implant-retained overdentures, exploring etiologies and treatment options. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study (January 2010–December 2023) was conducted on six patients from two hospitals (Hospital Gregorio Marañón y Hospital La Paz, Madrid). The data collected included fracture etiology, treatment type, and complications. Results: All six patients were women, with a mean age of 76.33 years. The most common cause of fracture was peri-implantitis (50%). Surgical treatment (open reduction and internal fixation) was performed in five patients, with different surgical approaches and fixation methods. One patient, due to multiple comorbidities, received conservative treatment. Complications occurred in 50% of cases, including delayed healing and hypoesthesia. The average hospital stay was four days, with a mean follow-up of 34 months. Conclusions: Mandibular fractures in these patients are rare. Surgical treatment using rigid fixation plates is recommended. The rational use of bone grafting should be taken into account. Treatment depends on fracture type, patient condition, and surgeon experience. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates on Facial Traumatology and Oral Maxillofacial Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4031 KiB  
Article
Effects of Loading Forces, Loading Positions, and Splinting of Two, Three, or Four Ti-Zr (Roxolid®) Mini-Implants Supporting the Mandibular Overdentures on Peri-Implant and Posterior Edentulous Area Strains
by Nikola Petricevic, Asja Celebic, Dario Puljic, Ognjen Milat, Alan Divjak and Ines Kovacic
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(9), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15090260 - 9 Sep 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1330
Abstract
Clinical indications for the Ti-Zr alloy (Roxolid®) mini-implants (MDIs) in subjects with narrow ridges are still under review. The aim was to analyze peri-implant and posterior edentulous area strains dependent on the MDI number, splinting status, loading force, and loading position. [...] Read more.
Clinical indications for the Ti-Zr alloy (Roxolid®) mini-implants (MDIs) in subjects with narrow ridges are still under review. The aim was to analyze peri-implant and posterior edentulous area strains dependent on the MDI number, splinting status, loading force, and loading position. Six models were digitally designed and printed. Two, three, or four Ti-Zr MDIs, splinted with a bar or unsplinted (single units), supported mandibular overdentures (ODs), loaded with 50–300 N forces unilaterally, bilaterally, and anteriorly. The artificial mucosa thickness was 2 mm. Strain gauges were bonded on the vestibular and oral peri-implant sides of each MDI, and on the posterior edentulous area under the ODs. Loadings were performed through the metal plate placed on ODs’ artificial teeth (15 times repeated). Arithmetic means with standard deviations and the significance of the differences (MANOVA, Sheffe post hoc) were calculated. Different MDI numbers, loading positions, forces, and splinting elicited different peri-implant microstrains. In the two-MDI models, 300 N force during unilateral loading elicited the highest microstrains (almost 3000 εμ on the loaded side), which can jeopardize bone reparation. On the opposite side, >2500 εμ was registered, which represents high strains. During bilateral loadings, microstrains hardly exceeded 2000 εμ, indicating that bilateral chewers or subjects having lower forces can benefit from the two Ti-Zr MDIs, irrespective of splinting. However, in subjects chewing unilaterally, and inducing higher forces (natural teeth antagonists), or bruxers, only two MDIs may not be sufficient to support the OD. By increasing implant numbers, peri-implant strains decrease in both splinted and single-unit MDI models, far beyond values that can interfere with bone reparation, indicating that splinting is not necessary. When the positions of the loading forces are closer to the implant, higher peri-implant strains are induced. Regarding the distal edentulous area, microstrains reached 2000 εμ only during unilateral loadings in the two-MDI models, and all other strains were lower, below 1500 εμ, confirming that implant-supported overdentures do not lead to edentulous ridge atrophy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dental Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2376 KiB  
Article
One-Piece Mini Dental Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: 10-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Non-Comparative Longitudinal Observational Study
by Nicole Schenk, Hristina Bukvic, Martin Schimmel, Samir Abou-Ayash and Norbert Enkling
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(4), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15040099 - 11 Apr 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2795
Abstract
This study presents the first 10-year follow-up investigation of the implant survival and peri-implant outcomes of one-piece mini dental implants (MDIs) retaining mandibular implant overdentures (IODs), including marginal bone level alterations (ΔMBLs), clinical peri-implant parameters, and complications. Twenty participants with horizontally atrophied mandibles [...] Read more.
This study presents the first 10-year follow-up investigation of the implant survival and peri-implant outcomes of one-piece mini dental implants (MDIs) retaining mandibular implant overdentures (IODs), including marginal bone level alterations (ΔMBLs), clinical peri-implant parameters, and complications. Twenty participants with horizontally atrophied mandibles received complete dentures and four MDIs (diameter 1.8 mm) at baseline. The dentures were converted into IODs with O-ring attachments. The 10-year follow-up comprised a radiological assessment of ΔMBLs, peri-implant parameters, as well as biological and technical complications. Results from a 10-year follow-up of 14 participants showed a 100% implant survival rate for all 56 implants. The mean ΔMBL after 10 years was −1.12 ± 0.80 mm, with 49 implants classified as successful (ΔMBL < 2 mm) and 7 implants with satisfactory survival (ΔMBL 2–4 mm). Time after implant placement significantly influenced ΔMBL, with stable MBLs after 5 years. The prosthetic survival rate after 10 years was 93%. ΔMBLs were not influenced by implant position or gender but were significantly smaller in subjects older than 65 years. Conclusively, one-piece MDIs with O-ring attachments offer a reliable treatment option for horizontally atrophied mandibles after 10 years, with high implant and prosthetic survival rates, potentially benefiting from advanced age regarding peri-implant bone stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Biomaterials and Oral Implantology—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 912 KiB  
Article
Clinical Peri-Implant Parameters and Marginal Bone Loss for Early Mandibular Implant Overdentures: A Follow-Up of 60 Months
by Abdulaziz A. AlHelal, Abdulaziz A. Alzaid, Saad H. Almujel, Mohammed Alsaloum, Khalid K. Alanazi, Ramzi O. Althubaitiy and Khulud A. Al-Aali
Medicina 2024, 60(4), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040588 - 31 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2042
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Despite the identified benefits of early implant loading, studies have questioned its advantages compared to delayed loading in edentulous patients. This study aimed to evaluate clinical peri-implant parameters and marginal bone loss around early placed and loaded mandibular implant [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Despite the identified benefits of early implant loading, studies have questioned its advantages compared to delayed loading in edentulous patients. This study aimed to evaluate clinical peri-implant parameters and marginal bone loss around early placed and loaded mandibular implant overdentures with a 60-month follow-up. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 43 patients were enrolled to receive 86 early loading sub-crestal dental implants through prosthetic guides. Implant overdentures were supported by two isolated implant locator attachments between two mental foramens. Clinical peri-implant parameters, including plaque index (PI), bleeding index (BI), peri-implant pocket depth (PIPD), and marginal bone loss (MBL) were evaluated using standardized techniques at 1, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months follow-up. At 60 months, complications associated with implant overdentures (IOD’s) were noted. The mean comparison of peri-implant clinical parameters was performed through ANOVA test. A p-value of ≤0.05 was taken as significant. Results: Out of the total 43 enrolled patients, 8 patients were lost during follow-up; as a result, 35 patients completed the 5 years follow-up. The mean values of PI, BI, and PIPD increased with no statistical difference (p > 0.05). For marginal bone loss, an increase in the mean values was noted at different time intervals with statistical differences (p < 0.001). The most common complications noted were loosening of the abutment, occlusal adjustment, retentive locator loosening and replacement, and relining of the denture. Conclusions: Early placement of IODs failed to prevent bone loss over time and was associated with complications, predominantly consisting of abutment loosening, occlusal adjustments, broken retentive locator components, relining, and rebasing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry and Oral Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2247 KiB  
Article
Mandibular Overdenture Supported by Two or Four Unsplinted or Two Splinted Ti-Zr Mini-Implants: In Vitro Study of Peri-Implant and Edentulous Area Strains
by Dario Puljic, Nikola Petricevic, Asja Celebic, Ines Kovacic, Manuela Milos, Dalibor Pavic and Ognjen Milat
Biomimetics 2024, 9(3), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9030178 - 15 Mar 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2136
Abstract
Clinical indications for the newly released Ti-Zr (Roxolid®) alloy mini-implants (MDIs) aimed for overdenture (OD) retention in subjects with narrow alveolar ridges are not fully defined. The aim of this study was to analyze peri-implant and posterior edentulous area microstrains utilizing [...] Read more.
Clinical indications for the newly released Ti-Zr (Roxolid®) alloy mini-implants (MDIs) aimed for overdenture (OD) retention in subjects with narrow alveolar ridges are not fully defined. The aim of this study was to analyze peri-implant and posterior edentulous area microstrains utilizing models of the mandible mimicking a “real” mouth situation with two (splinted with a bar or as single units) or four unsplinted Ti-Zr MDIs. The models were virtually designed from a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of a convenient patient and printed. The artificial mucosa was two millimeters thick. After MDI insertion, the strain gauges were bonded on the oral and vestibular peri-implant sites, and on distal edentulous areas under a denture. After attaching the ODs to MDIs, the ODs were loaded using a metal plate positioned on the first artificial molars (posterior loadings) bilaterally and unilaterally with 50, 100, and 150 N forces, respectively. During anterior loadings, the plate was positioned on the denture’s incisors and loaded with 50 and 100 N forces. Each loading was repeated 15 times. The means with standard deviations, and the significance of the differences (two- and three-factor MANOVA) were calculated. Variations in the MDI number, location, and splinting status elicited different microstrains. Higher loading forces elicited higher microstrains. Unilateral loadings elicited higher microstrains than bilateral and anterior loadings, especially on the loading side. Peri-implant microstrains were lower in the four-MDI single-unit model than in both two-MDI models (unsplinted and splinted). Posterior implants showed higher peri-implant microstrains than anterior in the four-MDI model. The splinting of the two-MDI did not have a significant effect on peri-implant microstrains but elicited lower microstrains in the posterior edentulous area. The strains did not exceed the bone reparatory mechanisms, although precaution and additional study should be addressed when two Ti-Zr MDIs support mandibular ODs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2531 KiB  
Article
Patients’ Satisfaction with Mandibular Overdentures Retained Using Mini-Implants: An Up-to-16-Year Cross-Sectional Study
by Antonio Scarano, Francesco Inchingolo, Iris Alla, Felice Lorusso, Sergio Rexhep Tari, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke and Ahmad G. A. Khater
Prosthesis 2024, 6(2), 251-262; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis6020019 - 12 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2693
Abstract
Background: Patients with edentulism often have an impaired functional, phonetic, and esthetic status, resulting in poor quality of life; hence, the mandibular overdenture has been considered the standard implant treatment for such patients. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of mandibular [...] Read more.
Background: Patients with edentulism often have an impaired functional, phonetic, and esthetic status, resulting in poor quality of life; hence, the mandibular overdenture has been considered the standard implant treatment for such patients. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of mandibular overdentures retained using mini-implants on patient-reported satisfaction and their long-term survival. Methods: We searched patients’ medical records for eligible subjects, screening and inviting patients who received a mandibular overdenture anchored on mini-implants over ten years ago. We used a numerical rating scale from 0 (the worst) to 10 (the best) to assess four aspects: comfort, retention, chewing ability, and speaking ability before and after having mini-implants. We carried out Kaplan–Meier analysis to assess their survival. Results: Forty-eight elderly patients who were medically compromised and had a mandibular overdenture anchored on four permucosal mini-implants were included. All patient-reported satisfaction (comfort, retention, chewing ability, and speaking ability) was significantly improved after supporting mandibular overdentures with mini-implants (p-values < 0.05), with retention and chewing ability being the most substantially improved. The 10- and 15-year mini-implant survival rates were both 97.9%. Conclusions: Mandibular overdentures with mini-implants can be considered a valid and practical alternative to conventional implant-supported overdentures in patients with atrophic ridges, medically compromised, and the elderly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive Protocols for Prosthetic Implant Maintenance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2774 KiB  
Article
Influence of Implant Number on Peri-Implant and Posterior Edentulous Area Strains in Mandibular Overdentures Retained by the New Ti–Zr (Roxolid®) Mini-Implants as Single-Units: In Vitro Study
by Dario Puljic, Asja Celebic, Ines Kovacic and Nikola Petricevic
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 2150; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14052150 - 4 Mar 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1496
Abstract
The new Ti–Zr (Roxolid®) mini-implants have not yet been fully researched. We analyzed peri-implant and posterior edentulous area microstrains during mandibular overdenture (OD) loading at different sites with different extents of forces when one-, two-, three-, or four- mini dental implants [...] Read more.
The new Ti–Zr (Roxolid®) mini-implants have not yet been fully researched. We analyzed peri-implant and posterior edentulous area microstrains during mandibular overdenture (OD) loading at different sites with different extents of forces when one-, two-, three-, or four- mini dental implants (MDIs) as single-units supported the respective ODs. The models were designed from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of an appropriate patient with narrow ridges. The mucosal thickness was 2 mm. Strain gauges were bonded on the vestibular and oral peri-implant sites, and in the distal edentulous area under the saddles. The loads were applied posteriorly bilaterally and unilaterally with 50, 100 and 150 N forces, and anteriorly with 50 and 100 N forces. Each loading was repeated 15 times. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, boxplots and the MANOVA. Higher forces induced higher peri-implant microstrains, as well as unilateral loadings, especially on the loaded side, in all models except the one-MDI model where anterior loads (100 N) elicited the highest peri-implant microstrain (1719.35 ± 76.0). The highest microstrains during unilateral posterior loading (right side) with 150 N force were registered from the right MDI in the two-MDI model (1836.64 ± 63.0). High microstrains were also recorded on the left side (1444.48 ± 54.6). By increasing the number of implants, peri-implant microstrains and those in the edentulous area decreased. In the three- and four-MDI models, higher microstrains were found in the posterior than in the anterior MDIs under posterior loadings. None of the recorded microstrains exceeded bone reparatory mechanisms, although precaution and additional research should be provided when only one or two MDIs support ODs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1314 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Different Implant Approaches in Overdenture Rehabilitated Diabetic Patients: A Two-Year Follow-Up
by Bruna Ghiraldini, Mônica Grazieli Corrêa, Fernanda Vieira Ribeiro, Fabiano Ribeiro Cirano, Pedro Henrique Faria Denófrio, Suzana Peres Pimentel and Marcio Z. Casati
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(3), 1026; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031026 - 25 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1325
Abstract
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is identified as an important condition that leads to implant complications, and the apico-coronal position and the prosthetic abutment seem to interfere with peri-implant tissue behavior This study aimed at assessing the effect on peri-implant parameters after implant loading of [...] Read more.
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is identified as an important condition that leads to implant complications, and the apico-coronal position and the prosthetic abutment seem to interfere with peri-implant tissue behavior This study aimed at assessing the effect on peri-implant parameters after implant loading of two different methodologies in type two diabetics patients (T2DM) who received implant muco-retained overdentures. Twenty-two mandibular edentulous T2DM received two implants: Test group: prosthetic abutment of a diameter smaller than the platform of the implant and a morse taper subcrestal implant level; Control group: prosthetic abutment of diameter identical to the platform and hexagonal external implant placed at crestal bone level. Clinical, inflammatory, and tomographic evaluations were performed at baseline (after prosthesis installation), and twelve and twenty-four months after implant loading. Test implants presented inferior probing depth and clinical attachment level compared to control at baseline and 12 months (p < 0.05). Test implants presented reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines at 24 months compared to the control implants (p < 0.05). The control group had more changes in bone parameters from baseline to the first and second years (p < 0.05). The test group resulted in reduced bone remodeling and better clinical conditions and positively modulated peri-implant immunoinflammatory molecules. Trial identification UTN code: U1111-1239-3638. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Science and Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2019 KiB  
Article
Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
by Asja Celebic, Ines Kovacic, Nikola Petricevic, Mohammed Nasser Alhajj, Jolanda Topic, Luka Junakovic and Sanja Persic-Kirsic
Medicina 2024, 60(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60010017 - 21 Dec 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 1913
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Due to a lack of long-term clinical studies that would clarify whether the insertion of three mini-implants (MDIs) can be as successful treatment as the insertion of four MDIs for the retention of mandibular overdentures (ODs), this 5-year prospective [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Due to a lack of long-term clinical studies that would clarify whether the insertion of three mini-implants (MDIs) can be as successful treatment as the insertion of four MDIs for the retention of mandibular overdentures (ODs), this 5-year prospective cohort study was set up. Materials and Methods: Participants (n = 83) randomly received either four or three MDIs and a mandibular OD. Clinical examinations were performed at the baseline, as well as after one, three, and five years, respectively. A total of 73 participants (38 in the four-MDI and 35 in the three-MDI groups) partook in the study. The marginal bone level change, success and survival rates, and prosthodontic maintenance were assessed. Results: Repeated measures showed that the mean peri-implant bone loss increased progressively at a small amount over five years in both groups (four-MDI group = −0.36 ± 0.74; three-MDI group = −0.33 ± 0.27 mm; p < 0.05). However, an ANCOVA revealed no significant effects of the group (no significant difference between the three- and the four-MDI groups; F = 0.085; p = 0.771), gender (F = 0.023; p = 0.88), or covariate age (F = 1.95; p = 0.167) on the dependent variable: the 5-year MBL change. The success rate (together with successful survival) was 93.8% in the four-MDI group and 91.7% in the three-MDI group. The log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test revealed no significant differences between them (X2 = 0.373; p = 0.541). Conclusions: In patients with narrow ridges, the insertion of three MDIs in the mandible for overdenture retention can be equally as successful as the insertion of four MDIs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry and Oral Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 611 KiB  
Article
Immediate Versus Conventional Loading of Two-Implant Overdenture with Magnetic Attachments: A 5-Year Follow-Up on Patient-Reported Outcomes
by Trang Ngoc Huyen Bui, Yuriko Komagamine, Sahaprom Namano, Anna Miyayasu, Daisuke Sato, Shunsuke Minakuchi and Manabu Kanazawa
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(21), 11687; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111687 - 25 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1821
Abstract
Comprehensive, long-term studies on patient-reported outcomes for two-implant overdentures with magnetic attachments using immediate or conventional loading methods are lacking. This study aimed to provide 5-year follow-up data comparing patient-reported outcomes for mandibular overdentures supported by two implants with magnetic attachments under immediate [...] Read more.
Comprehensive, long-term studies on patient-reported outcomes for two-implant overdentures with magnetic attachments using immediate or conventional loading methods are lacking. This study aimed to provide 5-year follow-up data comparing patient-reported outcomes for mandibular overdentures supported by two implants with magnetic attachments under immediate or conventional loading. Nineteen edentulous mandible patients were randomly assigned to immediate (IG) or conventional loading groups (CG). Two implants were placed with prostheses, loaded on the same day (immediate) or three months later (conventional). Participants completed questionnaires (oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient general satisfaction, and patient’s denture assessment (PDA)) at baseline and yearly intervals for 5 years. Results showed no significant differences between IG and CG throughout the study. However, the within-group analysis revealed significant improvements in OHRQoL, patient satisfaction, and all PDA domains from the baseline to years 1–5. Regarding patient satisfaction, significant differences were observed between T1, T2, and T3 when compared with T0 of IG and T1-T0 of CG. Regarding PDA results of T4-T5, IG exhibited several significant differences compared to CG. In conclusion, this study suggests that two-implant overdentures with magnetic attachments, whether immediately or conventionally loaded, improve patient-reported outcomes. Immediate loading may have prolonged effects on the improvement of patient-reported outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Dental Implants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1826 KiB  
Article
Reliability of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Predicting Implant Treatment Outcomes in Edentulous Patients
by Abdulaziz Alhossan, Yu-Cheng Chang, Tun-Jan Wang, Yu-Bo Wang and Joseph P. Fiorellini
Diagnostics 2023, 13(17), 2843; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13172843 - 2 Sep 2023
Viewed by 2024
Abstract
Since the development of CBCT has been utilized in dentistry, the images of the CBCT can assist the surgeon to evaluate the anatomy carefully. Despite the value of radiology evaluation, implant procedures may require additional consideration rather than only evaluating the anatomical factors. [...] Read more.
Since the development of CBCT has been utilized in dentistry, the images of the CBCT can assist the surgeon to evaluate the anatomy carefully. Despite the value of radiology evaluation, implant procedures may require additional consideration rather than only evaluating the anatomical factors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the predictability of using CBCT alone to plan for implant placement in edentulous patients digitally. CBCT images were analyzed by clinicians, measuring the maxillary and mandibular ridge heights and widths digitally of four predetermined implant sites in the maxillary and two selected implant sites in the mandibular arches of 91 patients planning for implant-supported overdenture. A total of 47 patients out of the 91 had completed implant placement on the edentulous ridge, contributing to 55 upper and/or lower arches (136 dental implants). Both predictabilities are low, implying that CBCT planning for implant placement on the edentulous ridge is not a good index and is insufficient to predict the surgical procedures as a solo method. The findings of this study indicate that digital planning by CBCT is insufficient to serve as an individual tool to predict implant procedures. Further information and evaluation must be considered for implant placement in the edentulous ridge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Craniofacial and Oral Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1311 KiB  
Article
Early Loading of Two Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures in Geriatric Edentulous Patients: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study
by Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Nuno Matos-Garrido, Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra, Ivan Ortiz-Garcia, Jesús Moreno-Muñoz, Enrique Núñez-Márquez, José Luis Rondón-Romero, Raul Ayuso-Montero, José López-López and Loreto Monsalve-Guil
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(11), 3825; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113825 - 2 Jun 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2620
Abstract
Background: This study aims to show the clinical outcomes of implants supporting mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients. Methods: Mandibular edentulous patients were diagnosed with an oral examination, panoramic radiograph, and diagnostic casts for intermaxillary relations and treated with overdentures over two [...] Read more.
Background: This study aims to show the clinical outcomes of implants supporting mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients. Methods: Mandibular edentulous patients were diagnosed with an oral examination, panoramic radiograph, and diagnostic casts for intermaxillary relations and treated with overdentures over two implants. After two-stage surgery, implants were early loaded with an overdenture at 6 weeks. Results: Fifty-four patients (28 females and 24 males) were treated with 108 implants. Thirty-two patients (59.2%) had a previous history of periodontitis. Twenty-three patients (46%) were smokers. Forty patients (74.1%) suffered from systemic diseases (i.e., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases). The clinical follow-up of the study was 147.8 ± 10.4 months. The clinical outcomes showed a global success of 94.5% of implants. Fifty-four overdentures were placed in the patients over the implants. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.12 ± 0.34 mm. Nineteen patients (35.2%) showed some kind of mechanical prosthodontic complication. Sixteen implants (14.8%) were associated with peri-implantitis. Conclusions: Based on the clinical results obtained, we can determine that the treatment of elderly edentulous patients with mandibular overdentures through the early loading of two placed implants is a successful implant protocol. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Health and Dental Care in Older Adults)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 256 KiB  
Article
The Effects of a Mandibular Overdenture on Edentulous Patients’ Quality of Life: A Clinical Study
by Edoardo Rella, Paolo De Angelis, Laura Papetti, Giovanni Damis, Antonio D’Addona and Paolo Francesco Manicone
Healthcare 2023, 11(11), 1577; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11111577 - 27 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2341
Abstract
Edentulous patients’ quality of life can be greatly diminished by the use of a badly fitting removable prosthesis, as many aspects of social life become notably impaired. The object of this study was to evaluate if treating these patients with a two implants [...] Read more.
Edentulous patients’ quality of life can be greatly diminished by the use of a badly fitting removable prosthesis, as many aspects of social life become notably impaired. The object of this study was to evaluate if treating these patients with a two implants mandibular overdenture could improve their quality of life as measured with the Italian version of the OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile). Edentulous patients, in good clinical condition, were selected. Two implants were placed following the recommended guidelines and three months after new mandibular dentures were manufactured, implants were uncovered and connected to the prosthesis using LOCATOR abutments. OHIP-14 was measured at baseline, one month after delivery and one year after delivery. An improvement was observed even after one month (with a mean reduction of 17 points in OHIP) and that improvement appeared to be stable at the one-year follow-up. Mandibular overdentures can improve a patient’s quality of life when compared to a tissue-supported removable complete denture, as long as the patient is subjected to an appropriate follow-up as the retentive rings of the attachment can deteriorate even after two years and lose a great deal of retentive capabilities. Full article
15 pages, 631 KiB  
Article
Marginal Bone Loss and Treatment Complications with Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Two Immediate or Conventionally Loaded Implants—A Randomized Clinical Trial
by Beatriz Pardal-Peláez, Abraham Dib, Yasmina Guadilla, Javier Flores-Fraile, Norberto Quispe-López and Javier Montero
Prosthesis 2023, 5(1), 295-309; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis5010022 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3360
Abstract
This study aimed to assess marginal bone loss and complication rates of mandibular overdentures retained on two implants with conventional and immediate loading protocols. Twenty edentulous patients were treated with mandibular two-implant-retained overdentures and new complete maxillary dentures. In one half of the [...] Read more.
This study aimed to assess marginal bone loss and complication rates of mandibular overdentures retained on two implants with conventional and immediate loading protocols. Twenty edentulous patients were treated with mandibular two-implant-retained overdentures and new complete maxillary dentures. In one half of the sample, the implants were loaded immediately by VulkanLoc® abutments. In the counterpart group, these abutments were connected to the implants two months after implant placement (conventional protocol). Treatment outcomes were evaluated at 2, 6, and 12 months after implant placement. According to the pre- and post-insertion radiographs, there was a mean marginal bone loss of 0.25–0.59 mm (CI 95%) after 13.4 ± 2.1 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences between groups. The failure rate (percentage of implants failing per year) was slightly higher in the conventional loading group (14.0 ± 32.7%) than in the immediate loading group (8.3 ± 18.0%). The findings of the present study suggested that there were no differences in marginal bone loss observed at one year for immediately loaded implants (0.40–0.39 mm) versus conventionally loaded implants (0.44- 0.36 mm) placed for the retention of mandibular overdentures. There were no differences in primary and secondary stability of immediately loaded versus conventional implants; however, in the conventional loading group, stability increased significantly between implant placement compared at both 6 and 12 months post-placement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Oral Implantology: Current Aspects and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop