Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (38)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = lumbar radicular pain

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 404 KiB  
Case Report
Endometriosis as a Differential Diagnosis in a 17-Year-Old Patient with Low Back and Radicular Pain: A Case Report
by Miryam Vergara, Daniele Ceron, Gloria Giglioni, Gabriella Di Crescenzo and Elisa Burani
Women 2025, 5(3), 28; https://doi.org/10.3390/women5030028 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 221
Abstract
Endometriosis is a benign and often underdiagnosed condition that affects women of reproductive age, typically between 18 and 45 years. It can cause infertility and pain, including radicular pain and low back pain (LBP). The aim of this case report is to emphasize [...] Read more.
Endometriosis is a benign and often underdiagnosed condition that affects women of reproductive age, typically between 18 and 45 years. It can cause infertility and pain, including radicular pain and low back pain (LBP). The aim of this case report is to emphasize the importance of making a differential diagnosis when facing LBP and radicular symptoms. We report the case of a 17-year-old female patient, R.A., presented with a significant LBP (NPRS 8/10) radiating from her lumbar spine to her right buttock and occasionally to both legs, accompanied by weakness. She revealed exacerbation of pain during menstruation, despite being under hormonal contraceptive treatment. After three physiotherapy sessions that included education, manual therapy and exercise, the patient’s pain persisted so her physiotherapist recommended an evaluation in the emergency department, where standard radiography did not reveal any significant findings. Physiotherapy continued until the fifth session, when the patient agreed to undergo evaluation at a specialized endometriosis centre. Further investigations revealed endometriotic tissue on the uterosacral ligament, leading to hormonal therapy adjustment, with which pain gradually decreased to a manageable level (NPRS 2/10). This case report highlights the importance of an early differential diagnosis in patients with LBP, as endometriosis can present not only in older women but also in younger patients, including those already on oral contraceptives. Therefore, to mitigate the risk of pattern recognition bias, clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for endometriosis, even in atypical or unlikely clinical presentations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 680 KiB  
Article
Lumbar Tractions in Radicular Pain Caused by Herniated Disc: Randomised, Open-Label, Superiority, and Controlled Trial on 424 Participants
by Elsa Bernhard, Ambre Hittinger-Roux, Helene Delaplace, Loïc Pauvele, Isabelle Charlot, Marion Geoffroy, Lukshe Kanagaratnam, Christophe Eap, Christophe Mensa, Loïs Bolko and Jean-Hugues Salmon
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5192; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155192 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 246
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Radicular pain is a frequent pathology, and disc herniation is the commonest aetiology. A meta-analysis summarising international guidelines for radicular pain, published in 2021, showed that lumbar traction’s place is still a topic of debate. In this study, our aim was [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Radicular pain is a frequent pathology, and disc herniation is the commonest aetiology. A meta-analysis summarising international guidelines for radicular pain, published in 2021, showed that lumbar traction’s place is still a topic of debate. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar tractions in treating radicular pain of discal origin in association with medical treatment versus medical treatment alone. We performed a randomised, controlled, interventional, prospective, superiority trial in Reims Hospital Rheumatology Unit. Methods: We included participants with radicular pain and concordant disc herniation with ambulatory treatment failure. Participants were randomised into two groups: medical group (analgesics, anti-inflammatories treatments, at least two epidural injections); tractions group with this medical treatment associated with lumbar tractions. The primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of participants experiencing a minimum of 25% improvement in radicular pain at one month follow-up between the two groups. Results: We included 424 participants: 211 in the tractions group and 213 in the medical group. We analysed 388 participants (194 in each group). We collected demographic and clinical data, lumbar and radicular Numeric Pain Scale at baseline, one and three months. A statistical difference was found for the primary outcome: 120/194 participants (62%) in tractions group and 98/194 participants (51%) in medical group (p = 0.024). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised and controlled study on this topic with these results. We can assert the superiority of lumbar tractions in association with medical treatment over medical treatment alone for radicular pain with concordant disc herniation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Surgery and Rehabilitation: Current Advances and Future Options)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1324 KiB  
Article
Pain Relief, Disability, and Hospital Costs After Intradiscal Ozone Treatment or Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A 24-Month Real-World Prospective Study
by Sara Bisshopp, Renata Linertová, Miguel A. Caramés, Adam Szolna, Ignacio J. Jorge, Minerva Navarro, Brian Melchiorsen, Benjamín Rodríguez-Díaz, Jesús M. González-Martín and Bernardino Clavo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4534; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134534 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 937
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic disc herniation after unsuccessful conservative management. This prospective study compared the impact on clinical and hospital outcomes of intradiscal ozone treatment vs. surgery (microdiscectomy/discectomy) in our clinical practice. Methods: Intradiscal ozone treatment [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Surgery is the treatment of choice for symptomatic disc herniation after unsuccessful conservative management. This prospective study compared the impact on clinical and hospital outcomes of intradiscal ozone treatment vs. surgery (microdiscectomy/discectomy) in our clinical practice. Methods: Intradiscal ozone treatment was offered to 70 patients with scheduled surgery because of lumbar disc herniation. Initial treatment was surgery in 38 patients and ozone infiltration in 32 patients: lumbar and sciatic pain (Visual Analog Scale), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score, days of hospital admission, and direct hospital costs were recorded during 24 months of follow-up. Results: At 12 and 24 months, lumbar pain, sciatic pain, and Roland-Morris score decreased significantly within both groups (p < 0.001). At 24 months, compared to the initial surgery, the initial intradiscal ozone treatment showed similar clinical outcomes with significantly lower requirements of surgery (100% versus 47%, p < 0.001) and lower hospital stay [median 2.5 (2–3) versus 0.5 (0–2) days, p < 0.001]. Direct hospital costs were significantly lower with initial ozone treatment at 12 months (p = 0.040). Conclusions: In our real-world prospective study, after 24 months of follow-up, initial intradiscal ozone treatment avoided surgery in more than half of patients and provided similar clinical outcomes with lower hospitalization requirements. In patients with lumbar disc herniation requiring surgery (microdiscectomy/discectomy), initial intradiscal ozone treatment could offer benefits for patients and healthcare service providers (NCT00566007). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 712 KiB  
Article
Postoperative Radiologic Changes in Early Recurrent Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Lower Lumbar Segments
by Chi-Ho Kim, Pius Kim, Chang-Il Ju and Jong-Hun Seo
Diagnostics 2025, 15(10), 1299; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101299 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 478
Abstract
Background/Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis, full endoscopic foraminotomy, is known for its numerous advantages and favourable clinical outcomes. While previous studies have analyzed preoperative radiological risk factors associated with recurrence within one year after endoscopic foraminal decompression, no [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis, full endoscopic foraminotomy, is known for its numerous advantages and favourable clinical outcomes. While previous studies have analyzed preoperative radiological risk factors associated with recurrence within one year after endoscopic foraminal decompression, no research has investigated postoperative radiological changes. The aim of this study is to analyze the radiological changes occurring in cases of early recurrence within six months after endoscopic foraminal decompression. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with unilateral lumbar foraminal stenosis who underwent full endoscopic foraminotomy at a single institution. The study included 11 recurrent patients who initially experienced symptomatic improvement and sufficient neural decompression on radiological evaluation, but exhibited recurrent radicular pain and radiological restenosis within six months postoperatively. Additionally, 33 control patients with favourable clinical outcomes and no evidence of restenosis were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative plain X-ray imaging was used to evaluate sagittal and coronal parameters reflecting spinal anatomical characteristics, including disc height, foraminal height, disc wedging, coronal Cobb’s angle, total lumbar lordosis angle, segmental lumbar lordosis angle, and dynamic segmental lumbar lordosis angle. The study aimed to analyze postoperative changes in these parameters between the recurrent and control groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, sex distribution, presence of adjacent segment disease, or existence of Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Analysis of preoperative and postoperative radiological changes revealed that, in the recurrent group, disc height and foraminal height showed a significant decrease postoperatively, while disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle demonstrated a significant increase. In contrast, the control group exhibited a significant postoperative increase in the total lumbar lordosis angle and segmental lumbar lordosis angle. Conclusions: Progressive worsening of disc wedging and the coronal Cobb’s angle, and reductions in disc and foraminal height, along with minimal improvement in lumbar lordosis following TELF, suggest the presence of irreversible preoperative degenerative changes. Careful radiologic assessment and close postoperative monitoring are essential to identify patients at risk of early recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Bone and Joint Imaging—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 5233 KiB  
Case Report
New Technique for S1 Nerve Root Transforaminal Percutaneous Fluoroscopically Guided Approach for Difficult Cases of Altered Anatomy
by Łukasz Kubaszewski, Adam Druszcz, Wojciech Łabędź, Zofia Kubaszewska and Mikołaj Dąbrowski
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(9), 3126; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093126 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 451
Abstract
Background: S1 nerve roots are difficult to approach during percutaneous procedures for the diagnostic and treatment procedures of low back pain with radicular symptoms. This is harder in older patients with obscure anatomies, due to the low bone density with overimposing degenerative changes [...] Read more.
Background: S1 nerve roots are difficult to approach during percutaneous procedures for the diagnostic and treatment procedures of low back pain with radicular symptoms. This is harder in older patients with obscure anatomies, due to the low bone density with overimposing degenerative changes in the facets and deformations. The otherwise straightforward procedure for the lumbar nerve roots, placing the needle in the proximity of the S1 under fluoroscopic guidance, becomes quite a challenge. Case presentation: In the proposed technique, the initial target for the needle is the lower part of the S1 facet in the convergent trajectory of the needle. After achieving contact with the bone the tip of the needle is moved caudally as, in proximity, it reaches the dorsal foramina of the S1/S2 segment—this is named “wandering to the hole”. The convergent trajectory of the needle ensures the success of the procedure with a minimal risk of intravenous drug administration, which is characteristic for the suprapedicular technique. Conclusions: The proposed technique is straightforward and reproducible due to the combination of the understanding of the surgical and radiological anatomy of this region, in spite of degenerative changes in the spine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancements in Spine Surgery: Best Practices and Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1630 KiB  
Article
Effect of Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection on Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection and Dorsal Root Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency in Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
by Gülçin. Gazioğlu Türkyılmaz, Şebnem. Rumeli, Mesut. Bakır and Suna. Aşkın Turan
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(24), 7821; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247821 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 936
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) refers to a lumbar disc herniation (LDH) that recurs at the same level, location, and side following surgical repair. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) and dorsal root ganglion pulsed [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) refers to a lumbar disc herniation (LDH) that recurs at the same level, location, and side following surgical repair. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) and dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (DRG PRF) therapy with and without caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain (LRP) associated with RLDH. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 57 patients treated for RLDH in a hospital pain clinic between September 2022 and February 2024. A total of 27 patients received TESI and DRG PRF therapy (Group 1) and 30 patients received TESI, DRG PRF, and CESI therapy (Group 2). We evaluated patient age, sex, symptom duration, pain medication use, number of prior LDH operations, presence of stabilization on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), intervention received, lumbar level and side of the intervention, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores before and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure. Treatment success was defined as an NRS score at least 50% or 4 points lower than the pre-procedure score at post-procedure 6 months. Results: There was no significant difference in NRS scores between the groups during the 6-month follow-up period. Moreover, NRS scores did not differ based on the presence of stabilization on MRI or the use of pain medication (p > 0.05). Conclusions: TESI and DRG PRF therapy were effective in the treatment of LRP associated with RLDH over a 6-month follow-up period, and adding CESI did not increase treatment success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 12012 KiB  
Review
Spontaneous Resolution of Symptomatic Synovial Cysts of the Lumbar Spine: A Comprehensive Review with Two Illustrative Cases
by Raffaele Scrofani, Matteo De Simone, Filippo Migliorini, Ettore Amoroso, Nicola Maffulli, Nicola Narciso and Giorgio Iaconetta
Medicina 2024, 60(7), 1115; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60071115 - 9 Jul 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3785
Abstract
Although lumbar synovial cysts (LSCs) are frequently described in the literature, they are a relatively uncommon cause of low back and radicular leg pain. Furthermore, their spontaneous resolution is an even rarer event. The standard treatment of the lumbar synovial cyst is surgical [...] Read more.
Although lumbar synovial cysts (LSCs) are frequently described in the literature, they are a relatively uncommon cause of low back and radicular leg pain. Furthermore, their spontaneous resolution is an even rarer event. The standard treatment of the lumbar synovial cyst is surgical excision. Spontaneous resolution in the literature is a sporadic event. In our experience, we have had two cases where the lumbar synovial cyst disappeared spontaneously. To date, only nine cases of spontaneous resolution of synovial cysts have been documented in the literature. In this discussion, we highlight a pathology that typically suggests surgical intervention, yet conservative treatment can be a viable alternative. We present two cases of large synovial cysts that were initially scheduled for surgery but ultimately resolved spontaneously without any treatment. While the spontaneous resolution of lumbar synovial cysts is extremely rare, conservative strategies are an option that should not be overlooked. Our cases contribute to the growing body of evidence on the spontaneous regression of symptomatic LSC, potentially enhancing the understanding of the disease’s natural progression in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1371 KiB  
Article
Combined Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy versus Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Lower Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Comparative Study
by Dong yuk Lee, Yongbum Park, Jun Hyeong Song, Jaeki Ahn, Kyung Hwan Cho and Suyeon Kim
Medicina 2024, 60(5), 809; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050809 - 15 May 2024
Viewed by 2282
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term effectiveness and safety of a combined ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy (FL)-guided approach in comparison to US-guided and FL-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (CESI) for treating unilateral lower lumbar radicular pain. Materials and [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term effectiveness and safety of a combined ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy (FL)-guided approach in comparison to US-guided and FL-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (CESI) for treating unilateral lower lumbar radicular pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 154 patients who underwent CESI between 2018 and 2022 were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the guidance method: combined US and FL (n = 51), US-guided (n = 51), and FL-guided (n = 52). The study design was retrospective case-controlled, utilizing patient charts and standardized forms to assess clinical outcomes, adverse events, complications during the procedures. Results: In all groups, Oswestry Disability Index and Verbal Numeric Scale scores improved at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection, with no significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). The treatment success rate at all time points was also similar among the groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that injection method, cause, sex, age, number of injections, and pain duration did not independently predict treatment success. Blood was aspirated before injection in 2% (n = 1), 13.5% (n = 7), and 4% (n = 2) of patients in the combined US and FL groups, FL-guided groups, and US-guided groups, respectively. Intravascular contrast spread was detected in one patient in the combined method groups and seven in the FL-guided groups. Conclusions: When comparing pain reduction and functional improvement, there was no significant difference between the three methods. The combined method took less time compared to using FL alone. The combined approach also showed a lower occurrence of intravascular injection compared to using FL alone. Moreover, blood vessels at the injection site can be identified with an ultrasound using the combined method. Given these advantages, it might be advisable to prioritize the combined US- and FL-guided therapy when administering CESI for patients with unilateral lumbar radicular pain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Persistent Pain: Advances in Diagnosis and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 14589 KiB  
Article
Endoscopic Lumbar Disc Surgery Experience with the TESSYS Technique in 253 Case Series
by Aldo Spallone, Roman Vladimirovich Khalepa, Evgeniya Amelina and Amrakh Magerramov Asif ogly
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1911; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071911 - 26 Mar 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1556
Abstract
Background: Herniated lumbar disc (HLD) is a widespread medical problem which can require surgery. Minimally invasive surgical management can represent an extremely valuable option for patients suffering from HLDs. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy is an alternative to classical microdiscectomy which was proposed [...] Read more.
Background: Herniated lumbar disc (HLD) is a widespread medical problem which can require surgery. Minimally invasive surgical management can represent an extremely valuable option for patients suffering from HLDs. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy is an alternative to classical microdiscectomy which was proposed more than two decades ago and has evolved technologically with time. Methods: The transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technique has been introduced in recent years and offers the advantage of performing a controlled foraminal augmentation with full nerve root protection. We started using this technique in 2016 and prospectively evaluated the results of endoscopic TESSYS-based operations performed in a three-year period until the end of 2019. Selection criteria were very strict, and we included only patients with unilateral radicular pain with no instability who failed conservative therapy. Out of the 253 patients operated on in that time span, 183 were available for follow-up evaluation. Results: After surgery, there was a clinically significant improvement of all symptoms which basically lasted in the long-term follow-up. Complications were limited and generally minor. Redo surgery with microdiscectomy was required only in four cases. Obesity did not play a clear negative role in patients’ outcome. Conclusions: Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy with the TESSYS technique represents a valuable management option for patients harbouring unilateral herniated lumbar disc located laterally. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Neurosurgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3845 KiB  
Article
The Spatial Characteristics of Intervertebral Foramina within the L4/L5 and L5/S1 Motor Segments of the Spine
by Piotr Nowak, Mikołaj Dąbrowski, Adam Druszcz and Łukasz Kubaszewski
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 2263; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062263 - 7 Mar 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2603
Abstract
The prevalence of lower back pain and radicular pain in the population requires more and more accurate diagnostic methods to more effectively prevent and treat patients with these ailments. In this paper, we focused on one of the causes of lower back pain [...] Read more.
The prevalence of lower back pain and radicular pain in the population requires more and more accurate diagnostic methods to more effectively prevent and treat patients with these ailments. In this paper, we focused on one of the causes of lower back pain and radicular pain—lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS). The aim of the study is to assess the morphometry of the intervertebral canals in the lumbar spine at the levels of the L4/L5 and L5/S1 motor segments. The obtained results showed correlations between the circumference and the surface area on individual cross-sections of the intervertebral canals at the L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels and determined the approximate shape of the root canal and its variability. On this basis, we were able to determine the influences of the patient’s age and sex on the morphometric parameters of the intervertebral canals at the L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels. Further research is needed in this area, taking into account additional factors influencing the shape of intervertebral canals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Imaging in Orthopedic Biomechanics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 685 KiB  
Systematic Review
Leiomyogenic Tumor of the Spine: A Systematic Review
by Abdurrahman F. Kharbat, Kishore Balasubramanian, Kiran Sankarappan, Ryan D. Morgan, Khawaja M. Hassan, Paolo Palmisciano, Panayiotis E. Pelargos, Michael Chukwu, Othman Bin Alamer, Ali S. Haider, Tarek Y. El Ahmadieh and John F. Burke
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040748 - 10 Feb 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2610
Abstract
The study cohort consisted of 83 patients with a mean age of 49.55 (SD 13.72) with a female preponderance (60 patients). Here, 32.14% of patients had primary LTS; the remaining were metastases. Clinical presentation included nonspecific back pain (57.83%), weakness (21.69%) and radicular [...] Read more.
The study cohort consisted of 83 patients with a mean age of 49.55 (SD 13.72) with a female preponderance (60 patients). Here, 32.14% of patients had primary LTS; the remaining were metastases. Clinical presentation included nonspecific back pain (57.83%), weakness (21.69%) and radicular pain (18.07%). History of uterine neoplasia was found in 33.73% of patients. LTS preferentially affected the thoracic spine (51.81%), followed by the lumbar (21.67%) spine. MRI alone was the most common imaging modality (33.33%); in other cases, it was used with CT (22.92%) or X-ray (16.67%); 19.23% of patients had Resection/Fixation, 15.38% had Total en bloc spondylectomy, and 10.26% had Corpectomy. A minority of patients had laminectomy and decompression. Among those with resection, 45.83% had a gross total resection, 29.17% had a subtotal resection, and 16.67% had a near total resection. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated positivity for actin (43.37%), desmin (31.33%), and Ki67 (25.30). At a follow-up of 19.3 months, 61.97% of patients were alive; 26.25% of 80 patients received no additional treatment, 23.75% received combination radiotherapy and chemotherapy, only chemotherapy was given to 20%, and radiotherapy was given to 17.5%. Few (2.5%) had further resection. For an average of 12.50 months, 42.31% had no symptoms, while others had residual (19.23%), other metastasis (15.38%), and pain (7.69%). On follow-up of 29 patients, most (68.97%) had resolved symptoms; 61.97% of the 71 patients followed were alive. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bone and Spine Metastases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1008 KiB  
Article
The Fate of Pre-Existing L5-S1 Degeneration following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion of L4-L5 and Above
by Dong-Ho Kang, Ji Hwan Kim, Bong-Soon Chang, Hyoungmin Kim, Dongook Kim, Sanghyun Park, Seong Hwa Hong and Sam Yeol Chang
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7463; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237463 - 1 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1620
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have identified various risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) at the L5-S1 level after fusion surgery, including preoperative sagittal imbalance, longer fusion, and preoperative disc degeneration. However, only a few studies have explored the risk factors for ASD at [...] Read more.
Background: Previous studies have identified various risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) at the L5-S1 level after fusion surgery, including preoperative sagittal imbalance, longer fusion, and preoperative disc degeneration. However, only a few studies have explored the risk factors for ASD at the L5-S1 level after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at the L4-L5 level and above. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for symptomatic ASD at the L5-S1 level in patients with pre-existing degeneration after OLIF at L4-L5 and above. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent OLIF at L4-L5 and above, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Patients with central stenosis or Lee grade 2 or 3 foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 preoperatively were excluded. Patients were divided into ASD and non-ASD groups based on the occurrence of new-onset L5 or S1 radicular pain requiring epidural steroid injection (ESI). The clinical and radiological factors were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for ASD of L5-S1. Results: A total of 191 patients with a mean age ± standard deviation of 68.6 ± 8.3 years were included. Thirty-four (21.7%) patients underwent ESI at the L5 root after OLIF. In the logistic regression analyses, severe disc degeneration (OR (95% confidence interval (CI)): 2.65 (1.16–6.09)), the presence of facet effusion (OR (95% CI): 2.55 (1.05–6.23)), and severe paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration (OR (95% CI): 4.47 (1.53–13.05)) were significant risk factors for ASD in L5-S1. Conclusions: In this study, the presence of facet effusion, severe disc degeneration, and severe paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration at the L5-S1 level were associated with the development of ASD at L5-S1 following OLIF at L4-L5 and above. For patients with these conditions, surgeons could consider including L5-S1 in the fusion when considering OLIF at the L4-L5 level and above. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 596 KiB  
Article
Predictive Factors Associated with Successful Response to Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Chronic Lumbar Radicular Pain
by Halil Cihan Kose and Omer Taylan Akkaya
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(19), 6337; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196337 - 3 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1407
Abstract
Percutaneous adhesiolysis (PEA) is of interest in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of PEA in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain refractory to epidural steroid injections and to determine predictive factors, including demographic, clinical, and [...] Read more.
Percutaneous adhesiolysis (PEA) is of interest in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of PEA in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain refractory to epidural steroid injections and to determine predictive factors, including demographic, clinical, and procedural data, to provide superior treatment efficacy. One hundred and ninety-three patients were reviewed. Successful treatment outcome was described as a 50% reduction in the visual analog scale score. Among the 193 patients, 109 (56.2%) exhibited a positive treatment response at 12 months. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, no depression (OR, 3.105; 95% CI, 1.127–8.547; p = 0.028), no spondylolisthesis (OR, 2.976; 95% CI, 1.246–7.092; p = 0.014), no previous lumbar surgery (OR, 2.242; 95% CI, 1.067–4.716; p = 0.033), mild foraminal stenosis (OR, 3.460; 95% CI, 1.436–8.333; p = 0.006), no opioid use (OR, 1.782; 95% CI, 0.854–3.717; p = 0.123), and baseline pain scores (OR, 0.787; 95% CI, 0.583–1.064; p = 0.120) were the predictive factors significantly associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome. PEA is a useful treatment option for patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain refractory to epidural steroid injections. A history of lumbar surgery, spondylolisthesis, depression, and severe foraminal stenosis could be associated with a poor prognosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2476 KiB  
Article
Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Juxta-Fusional Foraminal Stenosis
by Yong Ahn and Han-Byeol Park
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(17), 5745; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175745 - 4 Sep 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2087
Abstract
Adjacent segment foraminal stenosis is a significant adverse event of lumbar fusion. Conventional revision surgery with an extended fusion segment may result in considerable surgical morbidity owing to extensive tissue injury. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach for [...] Read more.
Adjacent segment foraminal stenosis is a significant adverse event of lumbar fusion. Conventional revision surgery with an extended fusion segment may result in considerable surgical morbidity owing to extensive tissue injury. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is a minimally invasive surgical approach for symptomatic foraminal stenosis. This study aimed to demonstrate the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of TELF for the treatment of juxta-fusional foraminal stenosis. Full-scale foraminal decompression was performed via a transforaminal endoscopic approach under local anesthesia. A total of 22 consecutive patients who had undergone TELF were evaluated. The included patients had unilateral foraminal stenosis at the juxta-fusional level of the previous fusion surgery, intractable lumbar radicular pain despite at least six months of non-operative treatment, and verified pain focus by imaging and selective nerve root block. The visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores significantly improved after the two-year follow-up period. The modified MacNab criteria were excellent in six patients (27.27%), good in 12 (55.55%), fair in two (9.09%), and poor in two (9.09%), with a 90.91% symptomatic improvement rate. No significant surgical complications were observed. The minimally invasive TELF is effective for juxta-fusional foraminal stenosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2256 KiB  
Article
Enhancing Functional Ability in Chronic Nonspecific Lower Back Pain: The Impact of EMG-Guided Trunk Stabilization Exercises
by Shivani Porwal, Moattar Raza Rizvi, Ankita Sharma, Fuzail Ahmad, Mastour Saeed Alshahrani, Abdullah Raizah, Abdul Rahim Shaik, Mohamed K. Seyam, Mohammad Miraj, Batool Abdulelah Alkhamis, Debjani Mukherjee and Irshad Ahmad
Healthcare 2023, 11(15), 2153; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152153 - 28 Jul 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3747
Abstract
Background: Nonspecific lower back pain (NSLBP) is described as pain that is not caused by an identifiable, well-known disease, such as infection, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory condition, radicular syndrome, or cauda equina syndrome. Aim: The aim of this study was to [...] Read more.
Background: Nonspecific lower back pain (NSLBP) is described as pain that is not caused by an identifiable, well-known disease, such as infection, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, structural deformity, inflammatory condition, radicular syndrome, or cauda equina syndrome. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of EMG-guided trunk stabilization exercises on functional disability associated with LBP. Materials and Methods: A single-blinded pre- and post-test experimental comparative design was used for this study. Fifty individuals with chronic NSLBP were screened for inclusion criteria. Of these, forty were randomly grouped into the EMG group receiving trunk-stability exercises with electromyography biofeedback and non-EMG group receiving trunk-stabilization exercises without EMG biofeedback. Participants performed five trunk-stability exercises 3 days a week for 4 weeks. The intensity of pain, range of motion, functional disability, and balance were measured at baseline and after 4 weeks. Results: Both techniques indicated a significant effect on chronic NSLBP; however, trunk-stability exercises combined with EMG biofeedback produced better results in alleviating the intensity of pain, increasing the range of motion, and improving functional disabilities and static balance. Conclusion: The present study confirms that trunk-stability exercises with EMG biofeedback can be practiced safely, contributes to a greater boost in neuromuscular efficiency in the lumbar flexors and extensors, and is effective in modifying functional disability for patients with NSLBP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation and Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop