Search Results (24)

Background: The extent and distribution of valvular calcification may differ across hemodynamic subtypes of severe aortic stenosis (AS), but their clinical relevance in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains incompletely understood. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 315 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI for symptomatic severe AS at a single center between January 2020 and December 2022. Aortic valve calcification was assessed by aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) on non-contrast CT and by calcification volume (CV) on contrast-enhanced CT. Patients were classified as high-gradient aortic stenosis (HGAS), classical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (cLFLGAS), paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (pLFLGAS), or normal-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (NFLGAS). Results: HGAS represented 70.8% of the cohort, whereas low-gradient AS subtypes accounted for the remaining cases. Valvular calcification burden was highest in HGAS and consistently lower in all low-gradient phenotypes, particularly in pLFLGAS. The non-coronary cusp was the most heavily calcified cusp across all groups. Neither AVCS nor CV was associated with all-cause mortality up to 2 years after TAVI. Conclusions: Low-gradient AS subtypes exhibit a lower valvular calcification burden than HGAS, but these differences did not translate into differences in 2-year mortality after transfemoral TAVI in this particular cohort. Full article

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is assessed by echocardiography in clinical practice. Conventionally, the aortic valve area, peak transaortic valve velocity/gradient and the mean transvalvular gradient determine if the AS is categorized as mild, moderate or severe. Recently, the entity of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS despite normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was described and flow (as determined by stroke volume indexed to body surface area) was used to further categorize AS. The new European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) guidelines in 2025 recommended a new phenotype-based classification, which improved the prognostication of AS. There are now five phenotypes: (1) concordant high-gradient AS; (2) low-flow, low-gradient AS with reduced LVEF; (3) low-flow, low-gradient AS with preserved LVEF; (4) normal-flow, low-gradient AS with preserved LVEF; and (5) discordant high-gradient AS. These appear to have different underlying pathophysiology, and hence prognostication and therapy. In addition, categories of AS in the setting of reduced LVEF are further divided based on their responses to dobutamine or exercise stress, which may result in different therapeutic strategies. In the transaortic valvular replacement (TAVR) versus the surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) era, the classification of these AS groups may have differing implications on the appropriate interventions. Furthermore, there are investigations on the effect of AS on the left ventricle and other chambers and stages of AS based on the extent of cardiac damage, which may have important prognostic value post-AVR. On the other spectrum, there are new developments in imaging analysis, such as using artificial intelligence. This state-of-the-art paper will comprehensively review the important updates in AS and its clinical implications. Full article

Background/Objectives: The diagnosis and risk stratification of valvular heart disease have traditionally relied on resting echocardiography. However, in a significant portion of patients, resting findings do not fully reflect the hemodynamic severity of the condition, particularly in asymptomatic individuals with severe valvular disease or those with nonspecific symptoms. In this context, stress echocardiography emerges as a vital imaging modality, providing a dynamic assessment of valvular, ventricular, and pulmonary function under hemodynamic load (from physical exercise or pharmacological agents). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive synthesis and critical evaluation of the current landscape, recent advancements, and future directions regarding the application of stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease. Results: This comprehensive review explores the incremental role of stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease, analyzing the evolution of its clinical applications, from low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis to the evaluation of contractile reserve and exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in mitral stenosis and regurgitation. We discuss standardized protocols, key parameters to monitor, and the diagnostic and prognostic outcomes from major clinical trials and current guidelines. Attention is given to stress echocardiography’s ability to unmask the true severity of the disease and to identify patients at high risk for adverse events, thereby guiding crucial clinical decisions, such as the optimal timing for surgical or transcatheter intervention. Conclusions: The review evaluates the limitations of modality and outlines future research directions, including its integration with new technologies like 3D echocardiography and speckle tracking techniques, to further optimize the role of stress echocardiography as a decision-making tool in the multidisciplinary management of valvular heart disease. Full article

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in industrialized countries. Stress echocardiography (SE), using either exercise or dobutamine protocols, has emerged as a critical tool to overcome limitations of resting echocardiography, refine risk stratification, and guide the timing of aortic valve replacement. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic role of SE in AS. Studies from all main databases (2000–2025) were systematically analyzed including prospective studies, consensus statements, and international guidelines. We highlight the physiological rationale, key prognostic markers, applications in asymptomatic severe and low-flow, low-gradient AS, and integration with multimodality imaging. SE is now guideline-endorsed for risk stratification in asymptomatic severe AS and the diagnosis of true severe versus pseudo-severe AS in low-flow, low-gradient disease. Future directions include advanced strain imaging, artificial intelligence, and broader adoption in the transcatheter era. Full article

Background/Objectives: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy caused by transthyretin (TTR) amyloid deposition in the myocardium, increasingly recognized in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). This study aims to investigate the diagnostic challenges and therapeutic strategies for patients with both conditions, focusing on shared pathophysiological mechanisms and key diagnostic indicators. Methods: A multimodal diagnostic approach was applied, utilizing cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and bone scintigraphy with technetium-99m-labeled tracers to assess AS patients with suspected ATTR-CA. Clinical signs, such as disproportionate heart failure symptoms, conduction abnormalities, and low-flow, low-gradient AS, were evaluated. Electrocardiographic findings, including low-voltage QRS complexes and pseudo-infarction patterns, were also assessed. Treatment options, including transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and emerging pharmacotherapies for ATTR-CA, were analyzed. Results: The study found that ATTR-CA is increasingly prevalent in AS patients, with shared mechanisms like oxidative stress and amyloid-induced tissue remodeling. Key diagnostic signs include disproportionate heart failure symptoms, conduction abnormalities, and specific electrocardiographic patterns. TAVR was effective in both isolated AS and AS with ATTR-CA, although patients with both conditions had a higher risk of heart failure hospitalization and persistent symptoms. Emerging pharmacotherapies, such as TTR stabilizers and gene-silencing agents, showed promise in slowing disease progression. Conclusions: A multimodal diagnostic approach is essential for the early detection of ATTR-CA in AS patients. Combining TAVR with emerging pharmacotherapies may improve long-term outcomes for this high-risk group, enhancing patient care in those with both conditions. Full article

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a prevalent and progressive valvular disease that poses significant diagnostic challenges, particularly in low-flow, low-gradient (LF-LG) states. Accurate assessment of AS severity is crucial for timely intervention and improved clinical outcomes. This narrative review critically evaluates the limitations of conventional echocardiographic techniques and explores the role of multimodal imaging—including advanced echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)—in enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Special emphasis is placed on the unique challenges of LF-LG AS, where standard Doppler-derived assessments may misclassify disease severity, necessitating a more integrative diagnostic approach. By addressing these key diagnostic uncertainties and proposing a multimodal framework for improved assessment, this review provides a comprehensive update on best practices in AS evaluation, with the goal of optimizing clinical decision making and patient outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: Diffuse myocardial fibrosis and altered deformation are relevant prognostic factors in aortic stenosis (AS) patients. The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate the relationship between myocardial strain, and myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) in patients with severe AS with a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. Methods: We retrospectively included 77 patients with severe AS undergoing PCD-CT imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning between January 2022 and May 2024 with a protocol including a non-contrast cardiac scan, an ECG-gated helical coronary CT angiography (CCTA), and a cardiac late enhancement scan. Myocardial strain was assessed with feature tracking from CCTA and ECV was calculated from spectral cardiac late enhancement scans. Results: Patients with cardiac amyloidosis (n = 4) exhibited significantly higher median mid-myocardial ECV (48.2% versus 25.5%, p = 0.048) but no significant differences in strain values (p > 0.05). Patients with prior myocardial infarction (n = 6) had reduced median global longitudinal strain values (−9.1% versus −21.7%, p < 0.001) but no significant differences in global mid-myocardial ECV (p > 0.05). Significant correlations were identified between the global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strains and the CT-derived left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (all, p < 0.001). Patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS and reduced EF exhibited lower median global longitudinal strain values compared with those with high-gradient AS (−15.2% versus −25.8%, p < 0.001). In these patients, the baso-apical mid-myocardial ECV gradient correlated with GLS values (R = 0.28, p = 0.02). Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCD-CT for TAVR planning, ECV and GLS may enable us to detect patients with cardiac amyloidosis and reduced myocardial contractility Full article

Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) may present with different flow, gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) patterns. Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (PLF-LG) severe AS has a specific clinical profile, but its prognosis and management remain controversial. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of different AS patterns in the incidence of major clinical events. Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out on all the consecutive patients diagnosed with severe AS at our tertiary hospital centre in 2021. Echocardiographic measurements were carefully reviewed, and patients were classified following current guidelines into four categories: high gradient (HG), concordant low-flow low-gradient (CLF-LG), paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (PLF-LG) and normal-flow low-gradient (NF-LG). The baseline characteristics and clinical events (heart failure admission, intervention and death) at 1-year follow-up were collected from medical records. The association between categories and events was established using Student’s t test or ANOVA as required. Results: 205 patients with severe AS were included in the study (81 ± 10 years old, 52.7% female). Category distribution was as follows: HG (138, 67.3%), PLF-LG (34, 19.8%), CLF-LG (21, 10.2%) and NF-LG (12, 5.9%). During the follow-up, 24.8% were admitted due to heart failure, 68.3% received valve replacement (51.7% TAVR) and 22% died. Severe tricuspid regurgitation was more frequent in patients with PLF-LG than in HG AS (14.7% vs. 2.2%; p < 0.01). Despite no differences in intervention rate, more patients with PLF-LG (32.4% vs. 15.9%; p = 0.049) died during the evolution. Conclusions: The PLF-LG pattern was the second most common pattern of severe AS in our cohort, and it was related to a higher mortality with no differences in intervention rate. Thus, this controversial category, rather than being underestimated, should be followed closely and considered for early intervention. Full article

Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. AS presents sex-specific features impacting pathophysiology, outcomes, and management strategies. In women, AS often manifests with a high valvular fibrotic burden, small valvular annuli, concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling/hypertrophy, and, frequently, supernormal LV ejection fraction coupled with diastolic dysfunction. Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS epitomizes these traits, posing significant challenges post-aortic valve replacement due to limited positive remodeling and significant risk of patient–prosthesis mismatch. Conversely, men present more commonly with LV dilatation and dysfunction, indicating the phenotype of classical low-flow low-gradient AS, i.e., with decreased LV ejection fraction. However, these distinctions have not been fully incorporated into guidelines for AS management. The only treatment for AS is aortic valve replacement; women are frequently referred late, leading to increased heart damage caused by AS. Therefore, it is important to reassess surgical planning and timing to minimize irreversible cardiac damage in women. The integrity and the consideration of sex differences in the management of AS is critical. Further research, including sufficient representation of women, is needed to investigate these differences and to develop individualized, sex-specific management strategies. Full article

Rest and stress echocardiography (SE) play a fundamental role in the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis (AS). According to the current guidelines for the echocardiographic evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis, four broad categories can be defined: high-gradient AS (mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg, peak velocity ≥ 4 m/s, aortic valve area (AVA) ≤ 1 cm² or indexed AVA ≤ 0.6 cm²/m²); low-flow, low-gradient AS with reduced ejection fraction (mean gradient < 40 mmHg, AVA ≤ 1 cm², left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, stroke volume index (Svi) ≤ 35 mL/m²); low-flow, low-gradient AS with preserved ejection fraction (mean gradient < 40 mmHg, AVA ≤ 1 cm², LVEF ≥ 50%, SVi ≤ 35 mL/m²); and normal-flow, low-gradient AS with preserved ejection fraction (mean gradient < 40 mmHg, AVA ≤ 1 cm², indexed AVA ≤ 0.6 cm²/m², LVEF ≥ 50%, SVi > 35 mL/m²). Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is indicated with the onset of symptoms development or LVEF reduction. However, there is often mismatch between resting transthoracic echocardiography findings and patient’s symptoms. In these discordant cases, SE and CT calcium scoring are among the indicated methods to guide the management decision making. Additionally, due to the increasing evidence that in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis an early AVR instead of conservative treatment is associated with better outcomes, SE can help identify those that would benefit from an early AVR by revealing markers of poor prognosis. Low-flow, low-gradient AS represents a challenge both in diagnosis and in therapeutic management. Low-dose dobutamine SE is the recommended method to distinguish true-severe from pseudo-severe stenosis and assess the existence of flow (contractile) reserve to appropriately guide the need for intervention in these patients. Full article

Background/Objectives: Among patients with suspected severe aortic stenosis (AS), discordance between effective orifice area (EOA) and transvalvular gradients is frequent and requires a multiparametric workup including flow assessment and calcium-scoring to confirm true severe AS. The aim of this study was to assess direct planimetry, energy loss index (Eli) and dimensionless index (DI) as stand-alone parameters to identify non-severe AS in discordant cases. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we included consecutive AS patients > 70 years with EOA < 1.0 cm² referred for valve replacement between 2014 and 2017. AS severity was retrospectively reassessed using the multiparametric work-up recommended in the 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines. DI and ELi were calculated, and valve area was measured by direct planimetry on transesophageal echocardiography. Results: A total of 101 patients (mean age 82 y; 57% male) were included. Discordance between EOA and gradients was observed in 46% and non-severe AS found in 24% despite an EOA < 1 cm². Valve planimetry performed poorly, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.64. At a cut-off value of >0.82 cm², sensitivity and specificity to identify non-severe AS were 67 and 66%, respectively. DI and ELi showed a higher diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.77 and 0.76, respectively. Cut-off values of >0.24 and >0.6 cm²/m² identified non-severe AS, with a high specificity of 79% and 91%, respectively. Conclusions: Almost one in four patients with EOA < 1 cm² had non-severe AS according to guideline-recommended multiparametric assessment. Direct valve planimetry revealed poor diagnostic accuracy and should be interpreted with caution. Usual prognostic cut-off values for DI > 0.24 and ELI > 0.6 cm²/m² identified non-severe AS with high specificity and should therefore be included in the assessment of low-gradient AS. Full article

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most prevalent degenerative valvular disease in western countries. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is considered, nowadays, to be the main imaging technique for the work-up of AS due to high availability, safety, low cost, and excellent capacity to evaluate aortic valve (AV) morphology and function. Despite the diagnosis of AS being considered straightforward for a very long time, based on high gradients and reduced aortic valve area (AVA), many patients with AS represent a real dilemma for cardiologist. On the one hand, the acoustic window may be inadequate and the TTE limited in some cases. On the other hand, a growing body of evidence shows that patients with low gradients (due to systolic dysfunction, concentric hypertrophy or coexistence of another valve disease such as mitral stenosis or regurgitation) may develop severe AS (low-flow low-gradient severe AS) with a similar or even worse prognosis. The use of complementary imaging techniques such as transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), multidetector computed tomography (MDTC), or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) plays a key role in such scenarios. The aim of this review is to summarize the diagnostic challenges associated with patients with AS and the advantages of a comprehensive multimodality cardiac imaging (MCI) approach to reach a precise grading of the disease, a crucial factor to warrant an adequate management of patients. Full article

Background: Few data exist on the comparative long-term outcomes of severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients with different flow-gradient patterns undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study sought to evaluate the impact of the pre-TAVI flow-gradient pattern on long-term clinical outcomes after TAVI and assess changes in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of different subtypes of AS patients following TAVI. Methods: Consecutive patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI in our institution were screened and prospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into four subgroups according to pre-TAVI flow/gradient pattern: (i) low flow—low gradient (LF-LG): stroke volume indexed (SVi) ≤ 35 mL/m² and mean gradient (MG) < 40 mmHg); (ii) normal flow—low gradient (NF-LG): SVi > 35 mL/m² and MG < 40 mmHg; (iii) low flow—high gradient (LF-HG): Svi 35 mL/m² and MG ≥ 40 mmHg and (iv) normal flow—high gradient (NF-HG): SVi > 35 mL/m² and MG ≥ 40 mmHg. Transthoracic echocardiography was repeated at 1-year follow-up. Clinical follow-up was obtained at 12 months, and yearly thereafter until 5-year follow-up was complete for all patients. Results: A total of 272 patients with complete echocardiographic and clinical follow-up were included in our analysis. Their mean age was 80 ± 7 years and the majority of patients (N = 138, 50.8%) were women. 62 patients (22.8% of the study population) were distributed in the LF-LG group, 98 patients (36%) were LF-HG patients, 95 patients (34.9%) were NF-HG, and 17 patients (6.3%) were NF-LG. There was a greater prevalence of comorbidities among LF-LG AS patients. One-year all-cause mortality differed significantly between the four subgroups of AS patients (log-rank p: 0.022) and was more prevalent among LF-LG patients (25.8%) compared to LF-HG (11.3%), NF-HG (6.3%) and NF-LG patients (18.8%). At 5-year follow-up, global mortality remained persistently higher among LF-LG patients (64.5%) compared to LF-HG (47.9%), NF-HG (42.9%), and NF-LG patients (58.8%) (log-rank p: 0.029). At multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis, baseline SVi (HR: 0.951, 95% C.I.; 0.918–0.984), the presence of at least moderate tricuspid regurgitation at baseline (HR: 3.091, 95% C.I: 1.645–5.809) and at least moderate paravalvular leak (PVL) post-TAVI (HR: 1.456, 95% C.I.: 1.106–1.792) were significant independent predictors of late global mortality. LF-LG patients and LF-HG patients exhibited a significant increase in LVEF at 1-year follow-up. A lower LVEF (p < 0.001) and a lower Svi (p < 0.001) at baseline were associated with LVEF improvement at 1-year. Conclusions: Patients with LF-LG AS have acceptable 1-year outcomes with significant improvement in LVEF at 1-year follow-up, but exhibit exceedingly high 5-year mortality following TAVI. The presence of low transvalvular flow and at least moderate tricuspid regurgitation at baseline and significant paravalvular leak post-TAVI were associated with poorer long-term outcomes in the entire cohort of AS patients. The presence of a low LVEF or a low SVi predicts LVEF improvement at 1-year. Full article

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is increasing in prevalence due to the aging population, and severe AS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography remains the mainstay for the initial detection and diagnosis of AS, as well as for grading of severity. However, there are important subgroups of patients, for example, patients with low-flow low-gradient or paradoxical low-gradient AS, where quantification of severity of AS is challenging by echocardiography and underestimation of severity may delay appropriate management and impart a worse prognosis. Aortic valve calcium score by computed tomography has emerged as a useful clinical diagnostic test that is complimentary to echocardiography, particularly in cases where there may be conflicting data or clinical uncertainty about the degree of AS. In these situations, aortic valve calcium scoring may help re-stratify grading of severity and, therefore, further direct clinical management. This review presents the evolution of aortic valve calcium score by computed tomography, its diagnostic and prognostic value, as well as its utility in clinical care. Full article

Despite significant advancements in medical therapy, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) continues to be a significant cause of death and disability. Reversible ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction due to viable myocardium is one such contributing factor. In these cases, coronary revascularization has shown promise in improving left ventricular function and prognosis. For patients with HFrEF and wide QRS, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective option to address electromechanical dyssynchrony. However, approximately 30% of patients do not respond positively to CRT, highlighting the need to refine candidate selection for this treatment. In some patients with reduced HFrEF, there is a condition known as classical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) that may be observed. This condition is characterized by a low transaortic flow, which leads to reductions in both the transaortic mean gradient and aortic valve area. Decision-making regarding revascularization, CRT, and pharmacological treatment play a crucial role in managing HFrEF. Cardiac imaging can be valuable in guiding decision-making processes and assessing the prognosis of patients with HFrEF. Among the imaging modalities, dobutamine stress echocardiography has come a long way in establishing itself as a feasible, safe, effective, relatively cheap non-invasive technique. The aim of this review is to explore the current literature on the utility of low-dose stress echocardiography in diagnosing and prognosticating patients with HFrEF. Full article