Search Results (293)

As thoracic surgeons more frequently address smaller lung lesions and perform lung-sparing resections, their objective is to resect an adequate specimen and margin without removing excess healthy lung tissue. Although perioperative lung nodule localization has been in practice for decades, the existing and emerging techniques used for the identification of targeted and occult lesions are more widely utilized today than they were in the past. In this review, we detail the logic behind this increase in use, classify the techniques into preoperative and intraoperative categories, and define the specific modalities available. Where applicable, we review the published data comparing techniques, detailing efficacy and safety. In the preoperative space, we describe standard computed tomography (CT)-guided localization, virtual-assisted lung mapping, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, robotic-assisted bronchoscopy, and novel fiducial markers. In the intraoperative space, we describe classical localization techniques, novel applications of intraoperative cone-beam CT, and fluorescence-guided surgery and intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI). Lastly, we review emerging approaches for intraoperative molecular imaging including a report on agents in early-stage clinical trials and a brief survey of promising preclinical models. With each approach mentioned, we analyze the potential benefits and hazards, and appraise the evidence for (or against) the use of any specific modality. Full article

Objective: To describe the surgical technique and early clinical outcomes of prone-transpsoas single-position corpectomy (PTP-corpectomy) for the management of complex thoracolumbar spinal pathology. Background: PTP-corpectomy is an emerging technique for providing simultaneous lateral and posterior spinal access without patient repositioning. The previous literature describes the PTP approach for interbody fusions; however, evaluation of its use for corpectomy is limited. This case series reports our experience with the PTP-corpectomy procedure at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed seven patients who underwent PTP-corpectomy surgery for complex spinal pathologies, including severe kyphoscoliosis, traumatic burst fractures, and revision in 2022–2025. Collected variables included demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, perioperative details, radiographic imaging, and clinical outcomes. Results: All seven patients successfully underwent PTP-corpectomy. The average operative time was 460.6 ± 147.1 min, and the estimated blood loss (EBL) was 892.9 ± 898.3 mL. Average length of stay (LOS) postoperatively was 6.7 ± 3.0 days. One case required revision of a preexisting construct and complex wound closure with plastic surgery, which had significantly increased operative time and blood loss (767 min, 2700 mL). Excluding this complicated case, the average time was 409 ± 63.7 min, and EBL was 591.7 ± 454.3 mL. All seven patients maintained clinical stability postoperatively, demonstrating improvements in pain and functional status at latest follow-up. Follow-up time ranged from 41 to 375 days. Conclusions: Our experience adds to the limited body of evidence that the PTP approach is well suited for corpectomy procedures, and that it is feasible, safe, and effective at improving clinical outcomes for complex spinal pathologies. This series adds to the limited case volume describing this technique in the current literature. Future studies with larger patient populations are warranted to further validate these findings. Full article

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a standard treatment for posterior pelvic ring instability and sacral insufficiency fractures. However, conventional transsacral S1 screw fixation is associated with notable complication rates, most commonly implant loosening; dysmorphic sacral anatomy increases the risk of iatrogenic L5 or S1 nerve root injury. This study presents a modified S1 trajectory to engage the high-density bone of the anterior and cranial S1 vertebral body (promontory) by transferring preoperative 3D planning to intraoperative 2D fluoroscopy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed implant placements for posterior pelvic ring instability, including high-velocity trauma and fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) multiplanar reconstruction defined a modified corridor from a posterior-caudal iliac entry point directed cranially and ventrally into the S1 promontory. The 3D trajectory was transferred intraoperatively using standard 2D fluoroscopy (lateral, anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet views) with the patient prone. In cases of reduced bone quality or intended sacroiliac fusion, 3D-printed titanium implants (triangular or cylindrical threaded, 10.0–13.5 mm outer diameter) were selected over 7.5 mm cannulated screws. Results: Overall, 137 implants were placed in 71 patients: 13 cannulated screws in high-velocity pelvic ring trauma, 72 triangular titanium sacroiliac fusion implants (iFuse Implant System^®, SI-Bone), and 52 threaded titanium fusion implants (iFuse TORQ^®, SI-Bone) in patients with FFP. The modified trajectory consistently engaged the anterior and cranial S1 vertebral body. Postoperative 3D CT confirmed accurate placement of all implants. No iatrogenic nerve injuries or revisions for implant malposition occurred. Mean follow-up was 12 ± 9 months. Conclusions: Preoperative 3D CT planning combined with standard 2D fluoroscopy guided a modified S1 trajectory toward the cranial S1 vertebral body. Accurate and safe implant placement was achieved in the prone position without navigation systems, providing a practical alternative when standard transverse trajectories are limited by narrow bony corridors or sacral or pelvic dysmorphy. Full article

Background: Fractures of the upper cervical spine are challenging to treat due to their proximity to critical neurovascular structures and the need for immediate, stable fixation. Open posterior fixation remains the standard but is associated with soft-tissue disruption and morbidity. Minimally invasive, navigation-assisted pedicle screw fixation represents a viable alternative for older populations, significantly reducing surgical morbidity and tissue trauma. The present study evaluates the accuracy, safety, and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive navigated posterolateral C1–C2 fixation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective consecutive case review of 51 patients who underwent minimally invasive C1–C2 screw fixation between 2019 and 2024. All procedures were performed using intraoperative O-arm imaging and StealthStation S8 navigation. Screw placement accuracy was assessed using the Bredow modification of the Gertzbein–Robbins and Heary classifications. Perioperative data, including operative time, screw dimensions, radiation dose, complications, and hospital stay, were recorded. Results: Fifty-one patients were included in the study. A total of 212 screws were placed. According to Gertzbein–Robbins grading, 92.4% were Grade A, 6.6% were Grade B, and 1% were Grade C. According to Heary grading, 95% were Grade I and 5% were Grade III. No vertebral artery injuries, new neurological deficits, or intraoperative hardware failures occurred. The mean screw lengths were 33.2 mm (SD = 3.38 mm) (C1) and 32 mm (SD = 4.30 mm) (C2). The mean operative time was 128 min (SD = 52.95 min). The mean radiation dose was 629.16 mGy·cm² (SD = 372.2 mGy·cm²). One superficial wound infection occurred. The median postoperative NRS was 4 (IQR: 4–5). The mean hospital stay was 4.21 (SD = 3.77) days. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the presented approach for C1–C2 fixation is a highly accurate and safe alternative to open posterior fixation for upper cervical fractures. Full article

Background: Achieving adequate oncological margins in tumors involving the thoracic costovertebral junction is technically challenging because of complex regional anatomy and the need to preserve neurological and biomechanical integrity. This case report describes a robot-assisted margin-extension strategy after incomplete resection of a thoracic costovertebral chondrosarcoma. Methods: A 31-year-old man with grade 1 chondrosarcoma of the left sixth rib underwent second-stage surgical radicalization after prior incomplete resection with positive medial margins. Following multidisciplinary discussion, a single-stage posterior procedure was performed, including robot-assisted T4–T8 stabilization with radiolucent CFR-PEEK instrumentation and robot-assisted sagittal vertebral osteotomy (“Postage-Stamp Osteotomy”) of T6 to achieve en bloc removal of the involved costovertebral segment. Results: The osteotomy was executed using a pedicle-referenced robotic trajectory workflow with sequential navigated drilling and controlled completion with a navigated osteotome. Total operative time was 379 min, with estimated blood loss of 800 mL. No major intraoperative neurovascular complications occurred. Histopathology confirmed negative margins. The patient was mobilized on postoperative day 1 and discharged on postoperative day 6 without new neurological deficits. Radiological follow-up at 3 months showed no recurrence, while clinical follow-up at 5 months demonstrated full return to baseline activities. Conclusions: This report describes a technically feasible robot-assisted margin-extension strategy in a highly selected thoracic spinal oncology scenario. Although long-term oncological conclusions cannot be drawn from a single case, tailored technology-enabled margin-oriented approaches may represent a case-specific option in carefully selected patients. Full article

Lymph node-to-vein anastomosis (LNVA) is an emerging physiologic treatment for fluid-predominant lymphedema that combines the efficacy of lymphatic bypass with reduced technical complexity. Despite its advantages, LNVA is limited by challenges in identifying suitable lymph nodes and recipient veins. This study evaluated whether three-dimensional stereolithography (SLA) could improve surgical planning, intraoperative navigation, and efficiency in robotic LNVA. A retrospective comparative study was conducted of 29 patients who underwent robotic inguinal LNVA between November 2024 and September 2025. Thirteen procedures were performed using standard robotic LNVA (control group), and sixteen were performed with the addition of SLA-assisted planning and navigation (study group). Patient-specific SLA models were created from contrast-enhanced CT data, segmented into lymph nodes, veins, arteries, and bony landmarks, and printed at 1:1 scale for incision planning and real-time intraoperative reference. Outcome measures included operative time, time to identification of target structures (TITS), surgeon-perceived operative difficulty (SPOD), and early patient-reported outcomes. Mean operative time was similar between groups (171 vs. 161 min), but TITS was significantly shorter with SLA (36 vs. 27 min; p = 0.021). Double LNVA was achieved in 69% of SLA cases compared with 8% of controls, without prolonging operative duration. SPOD was significantly lower in the SLA group (p < 0.001). All anastomoses were patent intraoperatively, and all patients reported symptom relief at one month. Model fabrication required approximately eight hours and averaged $270 per case. Stereolithography enhances robotic LNVA by providing a tangible three-dimensional roadmap that improves intraoperative orientation, reduces identification time, and enables multiple anastomoses without added operative burden. With modest cost and rapid production, SLA makes LNVA more precise, reproducible, and scalable—facilitating wider adoption and serving as a foundation for future outcome-based research. Full article

Thin-slice high-resolution computed tomography (CT) has improved the detection of small pulmonary nodules, increasing the demand for minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic resection. While lobectomy with lymph node dissection remains the standard surgical approach for many patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer, accumulating evidence supports sublobar resection for selected small, peripheral, and ground-glass-dominant lesions when sufficient margins are achievable. In thoracoscopic and robotic surgery, localization of nodules ≤10 mm or lesions located >5 mm from the pleural surface can be challenging, and failure to identify the target may lead to conversion, larger resection than intended, or prolonged operative time. Several localization strategies have been developed, including CT-guided percutaneous wire/coil/dye marking, bronchoscopic dye mapping, and virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP), robotic-assisted bronchoscopic dye or fiducial localization, radiofrequency identification microtag systems (Surgical Real-Time FInger Navigation and Detection) that provide real-time depth information, and single-stage intraoperative CT-guided marking and resection in hybrid operating rooms. This review synthesizes representative evidence and published outcome ranges, and compares workflows, marker-to-lesion precision metrics, complication profiles, operational burden, and cost structures. We emphasize the practical contrast between two-stage and single-stage workflows, the access-route differences between transthoracic and transbronchial techniques, and the need to report localization-to-incision “time at risk”. We also present an expert-consensus decision algorithm aimed at facilitating tailored selection of localization strategies for modern minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Full article

Background: Anesthesia Information Management Systems (AIMSs) support perioperative documentation and clinical decision-making, but their real-world adoption remains heterogeneous and incompletely understood. Methods: This study combined a cross-sectional survey with a randomized crossover simulation study conducted at a tertiary care center following AIMS implementation. All anesthesiologists were invited to complete a structured questionnaire assessing satisfaction, usability, adoption, and use of decision-support functionalities. In the simulation study, participants entered standardized intraoperative data into both paper-based records and the electronic AIMS, with documentation time recorded. Survey data were analyzed descriptively with subgroup analyses, and documentation times were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: A total of 27 anesthesiologists participated. Overall satisfaction and workflow integration were high, with 81.48% reporting that the system was easy to use and well-integrated into clinical practice. Electronic documentation was preferred across multiple domains, including time efficiency (92.59%) and accuracy (85.19%). In the simulation study, electronic documentation was significantly faster than paper-based documentation (median 540 vs. 1140 s; p = 0.0016). Adoption patterns demonstrated a bimodal distribution, with no association with technological literacy or engagement with educational materials. Decision-support features embedded within routine workflows were used more frequently than those requiring additional navigation. Conclusions: AIMS implementation was associated with high user satisfaction and improved documentation efficiency, but showed heterogeneous adoption and selective feature use. Effective integration appears to depend on workflow alignment rather than user characteristics alone. Full article

Background/Objectives: Transsphenoidal surgery has become the gold standard for the treatment of sellar and parasellar lesions, but it remains associated with significant anatomical challenges and the risk of intraoperative complications. The limitations of conventional imaging in depicting the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the skull base have led to a growing interest in virtual (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies, which offer enhanced spatial visualization, preoperative simulation, and image-guided intraoperative navigation. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current evidence on the role of virtual and augmented reality in transsphenoidal surgical interventions, with a focus on their impact on preoperative planning, intraoperative orientation, surgical outcomes, and neurosurgical training. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for the period 2015–2025. MeSH terms and free-text keywords related to transsphenoidal surgery, sphenoid sinus anatomy, and VR/AR technologies were combined using Boolean operators. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 for RCTs; methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies and AMSTAR 2 for systematic reviews. Clinical, morphometric, and experimental studies evaluating VR/AR applications were included. Data were extracted using a standardized protocol and synthesized through qualitative analysis, with subgroup analysis by technology type (VR vs. AR) and clinical application domain. Results: A total of 218 publications were identified, of which 52 met the inclusion criteria (clinical studies n = 12, simulation and technology studies n = 30, morphological studies n = 10). VR-based three-dimensional reconstructions were consistently associated with improved preoperative spatial orientation and anatomical landmark recognition. AR systems demonstrated a meaningful contribution to intraoperative navigation, with reported reductions in time to target and improved visualization of critical neurovascular structures. VR platforms showed high effectiveness in surgical training, with shorter learning curves and improved technical performance. However, the majority of included studies were small observational cohorts, simulation studies, or expert overviews, with substantial heterogeneity in methodology, technology platforms, and outcome measures, precluding quantitative meta-analysis. Conclusions: Virtual and augmented reality represent clinically promising adjuncts to transsphenoidal surgery, with demonstrated benefits in preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and surgical training. These conclusions should be interpreted in the context of a predominantly early-phase and heterogeneous evidence base. Standardized protocols, larger prospective studies, and randomized trials are needed before the integration of VR/AR with navigation systems and artificial intelligence can be established as a routine component of personalized transsphenoidal surgery. Full article

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS)—including full-endoscopic transforaminal and interlaminar techniques, and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)—offers patients smaller incisions, preserved paraspinal muscle, and faster recovery. Because the working corridor is narrow, intraoperative fluoroscopy plays a larger role than in open or microscopic approaches, making radiation exposure worthy of attention for both patients and surgeons. This narrative review aims to be a practical resource for the endoscopic spine surgeon. We synthesize the available literature on typical radiation doses across the main ESS techniques, compare them with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and open alternatives, review the factors that drive exposure, and walk through the full menu of dose-optimization options—from simple measures such as collimation, pulsed fluoroscopy, and leaded eyewear, through navigation platforms, to robotic guidance. A consistent practical observation is that the simplest, least expensive interventions often deliver the largest dose reductions. Capital-intensive technologies add real value, particularly for endoscopic interbody fusion, and work best alongside rather than in place of these basics. With routine dosimetry and straightforward as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) practices, surgeons can continue to build on the already favourable profile of ESS while keeping radiation exposure low. Conclusions are tempered by the largely retrospective and heterogeneous nature of the underlying evidence. Full article

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly proposed to improve surgical planning, guidance, and postoperative surveillance. Yet many promising applications remain disconnected from the full surgical pathway and the feasible limitations of clinical deployment. In contrast to prior reviews that primarily catalog AI use cases, this review combines the literature to define the translational pathway—from label design through staged validation to workflow integration—required for clinically deployable computed tomography (CT)-based surgical AI. CT and particularly computed tomography angiography (CTA) are especially usable sources for surgical AI because they provide a standardized three-dimensional anatomic model that is already embedded in many clinical workflows. In autologous breast reconstruction, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap CTA offers an unusually strong model system: the anatomy is discrete, surgeon decisions are actionable, and downstream operative and postoperative outcomes are measurable. These characteristics make DIEP reconstruction suitable not only for technical model development, but also for exacting testing of how CT-based AI should be annotated, validated, displayed, and governed. Methods: This focused narrative review combines evidence across the surgical workflow, spanning preoperative planning and risk stratification, intraoperative support, and postoperative monitoring. Reporting standards, implementation frameworks, governance, and regulatory sources were also considered when directly relevant to clinical deployment. Results: Across the available literature on breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap, preoperative CTA has been associated with reductions in operative time of approximately 54–76 min in individual studies. Semi-automated perforator mapping can reduce review time from 2 to 3 h to approximately 30 min. Intraoperative extended-reality tools and surgeon-facing navigation systems illustrate the importance of the ‘last mile’ of translation, while postoperative monitoring models show how imaging-linked data can support a closed-loop learning system. Across these stages, recurring limits include target mismatch, weak external validation, protocol variability, inconsistent reporting, limited subgroup analysis, and inadequate integration of economic and governance considerations. Conclusions: We argue that the next important step is not a generic autonomous model, but a clinically deployable DIEP-CTA-AI program. The practical blueprint proposed here is staged: structured anatomical labels, separate imaging, surgeons’ decisions, and outcome reference standards, dense intermediate endpoints, retrospective and external validation, reader studies, prospective silent deployment, and workflow-impact assessment. If implemented in this way, DIEP flap CTA can serve as a practical blueprint for CT-based AI translation in surgery more broadly. Full article

Dental implant placement has evolved from conventional freehand techniques toward digitally guided workflows integrating cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM), and dynamic navigation systems. Although guided surgery improves positional accuracy, its clinical relevance compared with freehand placement remains debated. This narrative review, based on a systematic and structured literature search following predefined selection criteria, analyzes studies published between 2000 and 2025 comparing guided and freehand implant placement regarding accuracy, survival, complications, biological outcomes, and workflow efficiency. Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science identified 40 eligible human clinical studies for qualitative synthesis. Guided placement consistently demonstrated greater positional accuracy, with angular deviations of approximately 2–4° versus 5–9° for freehand placement and linear deviations reduced by about 1 mm. Nevertheless, implant survival rates were high and comparable for both techniques, generally exceeding 95% across short- and medium-term follow-up. Overall complication rates were low; guided approaches reduced anatomical risk and improved prosthetic predictability in complex or multi-implant cases, while freehand placement allowed greater intraoperative flexibility and tactile feedback, potentially optimizing primary stability in variable bone conditions. Marginal bone loss and peri-implant tissue outcomes were similar between approaches. Guided workflows required additional planning time and costs but enhanced reproducibility in complex rehabilitations. Guided and freehand implant placement should therefore be considered complementary strategies, with optimal outcomes depending on case selection, surgical expertise, and the balanced integration of digital technologies into contemporary implant practice. Full article

The convergence of artificial intelligence and robotic surgery is redefining the management of genitourinary cancers by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, surgical precision, and training efficiency. This narrative review explores recent advancements in artificial intelligence applications across the cancer care continuum, with a focus on prostate, kidney, and bladder malignancies. Artificial intelligence tools, particularly those based on machine learning and deep learning, have demonstrated strong performance in analyzing imaging data, segmenting tumors, predicting pathological features, and supporting clinical decision-making. Intraoperatively, artificial intelligence enables skill assessment, personalized feedback, and real-time navigation by processing data from surgical videos and robotic system sensors. Augmented reality and intraoperative modeling further enhance visualization and margin control during complex procedures. The review also discusses emerging technologies such as single-port robotic platforms, which offer advantages in confined anatomical spaces and support less invasive approaches. Additionally, the growing field of telesurgery is addressed, highlighting its feasibility for complex urologic operations across vast distances. While many of these innovations are still in early stages of clinical validation, their integration into practice has the potential to improve oncologic and functional outcomes, expand access to expert care, and foster the development of next-generation surgical strategies in urologic oncology. Full article

Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive cervical spine surgery (MIS-CSS) relies heavily on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, raising concerns about radiation exposure to patients and surgical staff. Unlike lumbar MIS, cervical-specific radiation exposure has not been systematically reviewed, despite distinct anatomical considerations, including proximity to the thyroid gland and lens of the eye. This review aims to quantify intraoperative radiation exposure during MIS cervical spine procedures and evaluate available dose-reduction strategies. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar in April 2026 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting original quantitative radiation data during minimally invasive cervical spine procedures in adult patients (≥10 patients) were included. Quality was assessed using the MINORS tool and the JBI checklist. Results: Seven studies encompassing 380 patients were included. Procedures comprised ACDF (four studies), minimally invasive posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy (two studies), and CT-navigated cervical instrumentation (one study). Patient effective doses during ACDF ranged from 0.015 to 1.3 mSv, with thyroid doses of 0.194–0.290 mGy. Standalone ACDF reduced patient dose by 36–58% compared to plated ACDF (p < 0.001). Navigation-assisted posterior cervical foraminotomy achieved a median fluoroscopy time of 10 s with negligible staff exposure. Surgeon per-procedure exposure during cervical discectomy (chest 0.122 µSv, lens 3.1 µSv, hands 7.1 µSv) was approximately half that of lumbar discectomy. Conclusions: Radiation doses during individual MIS cervical procedures appear to be within occupational safety limits, though the current evidence is insufficient to establish definitive dose thresholds. Standalone implant designs and intraoperative navigation represent effective, complementary dose-reduction strategies. Standardized prospective research is needed to establish cervical-specific radiation safety benchmarks. Full article

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective treatment for anteromedial osteoarthritis in carefully selected patients. Increasing attention has recently been directed toward restoration of pre-arthritic coronal alignment, supported by the use of the arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle (aHKA) to estimate constitutional lower limb alignment. In medial UKA, kinematic alignment principles derived from the original technique described by Cartier et al. may help to reproduce native joint-line orientation while preserving physiological soft-tissue balance. This technical note details the indications, preoperative assessment, planning strategy, and operative steps of the procedure. Preoperative long-leg weight-bearing radiographs are used to estimate constitutional alignment through the aHKA and to plan the coronal inclination of the tibial cut. Intraoperatively, the distal position of the extramedullary guide is reproduced according to the preoperative planning in order to restore the native inclination of the medial tibial plateau. The sagittal tibial cut, posterior tibial slope, distal femoral cut, component sizing, gap assessment, and cementation technique are described, with emphasis on anatomical landmarks and technical pearls to improve reproducibility. The described technique provides a practical method for approximating constitutional coronal alignment in medial UKA without the use of robotic or navigated systems. The key feature of the procedure is accurate planning and execution of the tibial cut in both the coronal and sagittal planes in order to reproduce native joint-line orientation and preserve appropriate ligament balance. Full article