Search Results (193)

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and self-confidence of physicians and dentists in Croatia regarding the relationship between oral and systemic health, focusing on periodontal disease and oral manifestations of systemic diseases. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among physicians and dentists in Croatian primary healthcare. The questionnaire addressed six thematic domains, including demographic information, knowledge, self-assessment, and clinical practice. Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses were performed. Results: A total of 529 respondents were included (291 physicians and 238 dentists). The mean knowledge score for the association between periodontitis and systemic diseases was 6.8 ± 3.6 out of 15, indicating limited knowledge. For oral manifestations of systemic diseases, the mean score was 10.0 ± 3.8 out of 16, reflecting moderate proficiency. Dentists scored higher than physicians in both domains, though not significantly (p > 0.05). Routine oral mucosal examinations were reported by 89.5% of dentists and 43.0% of physicians (p ≤ 0.001). Only 21.3% of physicians correctly identified the link between periodontitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes, compared to 58.8% of dentists. The primary barriers to effective clinical management were a lack of experience (52.7%) and inadequate education. While 68.3% of dentists felt adequately educated on oral–systemic links, only 22.7% of physicians reported the same. Conclusions: Significant gaps in knowledge and confidence were observed, particularly among physicians. These findings underscore the need to integrate oral–systemic health topics into medical education and to promote interprofessional collaboration to improve patient outcomes. Full article

Background: Brain health is a growing public health priority due to the high global burden of neurological and mental disorders. Promoting brain health across the lifespan supports individual and societal well-being, creativity, and productivity. Objective: To address the need for specialized education in this field, the University of Bern developed a Certificate of Advanced Studies (CAS) in Brain Health. This article outlines the program’s rationale, structure, and goals. Program Description: The one-year, 15 ECTS-credit program is primarily online and consists of four modules: (1) Introduction to Brain Health, (2) Brain Disorders, (3) Risk Factors, Protective Factors and Interventions, and (4) Brain Health Implementation. It offers a multidisciplinary, interprofessional, life-course approach, integrating theory with practice through case studies and interactive sessions. Designed for healthcare and allied professionals, the CAS equips participants with skills to promote brain health in clinical, research, and public health contexts. Given the shortage of trained professionals in Europe and globally, the program seeks to build a new generation of brain health advocates. It aims to inspire action and initiatives that support the prevention, early detection, and management of brain disorders. Conclusions: The CAS in Brain Health is an innovative educational response to a pressing global need. By fostering interdisciplinary expertise and practical skills, it enhances professional development and supports improved brain health outcomes at individual and population levels. Full article

Background: Pharmacy technicians are increasingly involved in immunization services, enhancing vaccine accessibility and reducing pharmacies’ workload. This scoping review aims to (1) provide a comprehensive overview of pharmacy technicians’ involvement in immunization services across various healthcare settings and countries, and (2) conduct a comparative analysis of training curricula for pharmacy technicians on immunization. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A comprehensive search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed using keywords and MeSH terms such as “pharmacy technician(s)”, “immunization”, “vaccination”, “role”, and “involvement”. Studies included assessed pharmacy technicians’ roles in vaccine administration, training, and public health outcomes. Descriptive and thematic analyses were used to synthesize the findings. In addition, a supplementary analysis of immunization training curricula was conducted, reviewing programs from different countries to identify similarities, differences, and gaps in course structure, content, and delivery formats. Lastly, a comprehensive toolkit was developed, offering guidelines intended to facilitate the implementation of immunization training programs. Results: A total of 35 articles met the inclusion criteria, primarily from the United States of America (n = 30), Canada (n = 2), Ethiopia (n = 1), Denmark (n = 1) and United Kingdom (n = 1). The findings indicate that pharmacy technicians contribute significantly to vaccine administration, patient education, and workflow optimization, particularly in community pharmacies. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated their involvement in immunization programs. Key challenges include regulatory barriers, a lack of standardized training, and resistance from other healthcare professionals. Facilitators include legislative support (e.g., the PREP Act), structured training programs, and collaborative pharmacist–technician models. Conclusions: Pharmacy technicians can play a vital role in expanding immunization services, improving vaccine uptake, and reducing pharmacist workload. Addressing regulatory inconsistencies, enhancing training, and fostering interprofessional collaboration are crucial for their effective integration of immunization programs. Since immunization by pharmacy technicians is not yet allowed in many EU countries, this review will provide a foundational basis to address their potential to support the healthcare workforce and improve access to immunization services. Full article

Background/Objectives: Effective teamwork is crucial for minimizing human error in healthcare settings. Medical teams, typically composed of physicians and nurses, supported by auxiliary professionals, achieve better outcomes when they possess strong collaborative competencies. High-quality teamwork is associated with fewer adverse events and complications and lower mortality rates. Based on this background, the objective of this study is to analyze the perception of non-technical skills and immediate learning outcomes in interprofessional simulation settings based on E-CRM items. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted involving participants from the official postgraduate Medicine and Nursing programs at the Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM) during the 2024–2025 academic year. Four interprofessional E-CRM simulation sessions were planned, involving randomly assigned groups with proportional representation of medical and nursing students. Teams worked consistently throughout the training and participated in clinical scenarios observed via video transmission by their peers. Post-scenario debriefings followed INACSL guidelines and employed the PEARLS method. Results: Findings indicate that 48.3% of participants had no difficulty identifying the team leader, while 51.7% reported minor difficulty. Role assignment posed moderate-to-high difficulty for 24.1% of respondents. Communication, situation awareness, and early help-seeking were generally managed with ease, though mobilizing resources remained a challenge for 27.5% of participants. Conclusions: This study supports the value of interprofessional education in developing essential competencies for handling urgent, emergency, and high-complexity clinical situations. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration contributes to safer, more effective patient care. Full article

This concept paper outlines an implementation strategy for a mandatory training programme using the ADDIE instructional design model for delivery to nurses and other health professionals in an interprofessional education (IPE) environment). Background: Competence in Basic Life Support (BLS) is a lifesaving requirement for health professionals in clinical settings to ensure patient safety and accreditation outcomes. It is essential that health professionals are supported in attending mandatory training, including BLS. To inform learning and teaching strategies, it is useful to apply theoretical perspectives to the development of mandatory staff training methods. However, various training models exist, and few are grounded in instructional design theory to the unique environment for BLS in IPE. Method: A theory-based implementation strategy is outlined for a mandatory interprofessional training programme including BLS, using the ADDIE model to enhance patient outcomes. ADDIE is an instructional design framework comprising five elements: Assess, Design, Develop, Implement and Evaluate; describing a learning methodology that can be readily applied to mandatory training in IPE. Results: Through its iterative capability, the ADDIE model promotes learner needs and rapid acquisition of clinical skills that improve training accessibility. The strategy can equip educators with teaching skills based on a robust theoretical model, with potential to promote nursing and health professional attendance for mandatory training. Conclusions: Mandatory health professional training that addresses a theory informed strategy framed by the ADDIE model can support interprofessional collaboration and consistent competency across healthcare teams. This strategy has potential to contribute by demonstrating how instructional design can be operationalised to improve the effectiveness and engaging approach to BLS training and education to the unique dynamics of an interprofessional environment. Full article

(1) Background: Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer is the fastest-growing head and neck malignancy, yet vaccination coverage remains suboptimal. (2) Methods: In this cross-sectional survey conducted from April 2022 to April 2023, 400 parents of patients aged 8–18 years (mean ± SD = 12.8 ± 2.6; 59.3% female) reported their child’s HPV vaccination status and willingness to initiate or complete the vaccine series at a dental clinic. For those who were not fully vaccinated, reasons for refusal were documented. (3) Results: Over half (54.5%, n = 218) of the children were not fully vaccinated. Notably, 21% (46/218) of parents indicated an immediate willingness to vaccinate their child if the dentist offered it—a significant potential for improvement compared to general healthcare settings. Reported barriers included preference for a physician’s office (43.6%), indecision (20.3%), unspecified concerns (14.5%), safety worries (8.1%), and religious objections (5.2%). Male and younger patients (9–11 years) showed significantly lower vaccination coverage (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Dentists can substantially impact public health by integrating immunization counseling, interprofessional collaboration, and vaccine administration, thereby addressing critical gaps in HPV-related cancer prevention. These findings highlight the opportunity for dental offices to enhance vaccination rates and prompt further research, education, and policy initiatives to advance the oral and general health of our patients. Full article

Iterative decision making is deeply embedded in the design process of healthcare facilities. A significant body of literature and practices, most notably Evidence-based Design, explicitly seeks to better inform decisions as a key pathway to achieving improved outcomes. The objective of this systematic review is to explore multiple dimensions of decision making in the healthcare design literature, including interprofessional stakeholder engagement, decision flow elements, and multidisciplinary methodologies aimed at improving decision quality during healthcare facility design processes. This review offers a comprehensive review of 114 papers from the Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Art and Architecture Source. Decisions made during healthcare facility design processes are characterized as complex, highly interdependent, and difficult to reverse with significant implications for human and operational outcomes. The published literature emphasizes decision support generated from ex ante or ex post research. Despite numerous references to the importance of decision making, there are considerable gaps in the study of interprofessional group decision-making dynamics. The adoption and application of decision analysis tools and integrated decision flows are emerging. This review synthesizes current perspectives and methods aimed at improving decision making during the design of healthcare facilities and proposes a potential framework for future investigations of design decision quality. Full article

Healthcare is a dynamic and ever-changing phenomenon and is subject to multiple challenges, particularly concerning sustainability and cost issues. The literature identifies bed space and problems related to the lack of hospital beds as being directly or indirectly related to both admission and discharge processes, with delays in in-patient discharges being identified as a variable of significance when it comes to a health system’s overall performance. In this respect, the aim of this research was to explore factors related to delayed discharges in an acute hospital setting in Malta, a small European member state, through the perspectives of health professionals. This study followed a qualitative approach. Semi-structured interviews (n = 8) and focus groups (n = 2) were conducted with a diverse group of experienced health professionals. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and all data were treated with strict confidentiality throughout the study. The sample was limited to professionals working in adult, non-specialized healthcare settings. Manual thematic analysis was carried out. Codes were grouped to derive seven main themes, which were identified after carrying out the thematic analysis process on the transcripts of the interviews/focus groups. The derived themes are the following: (a) a faulty system, which is open to abuse and inefficiency, (b) procedural delays directly impacting delayed discharges, (c) long-term care/social cases as a major cause of delayed discharges, (d) the impact of external factors on delayed discharges, (e) stakeholder suggestions to management to counteract delayed discharges, (f) the impact of COVID-19 on delayed discharges, and (g) inter-professional relationships. Factors related to delayed discharges and the effects of delayed discharges on the hospital emerged from the main findings, together with specific potential interventions to minimise delays in discharge. Health professional interactions and the effects of inter-professional relationship setbacks on delayed discharges were explored, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital dynamics and additional delays were also addressed. This information is intended to provide hospital administrators with data-driven internal organisational evidence to guide them through changes and to inform future decisions regarding hospital performance and efficiency from a discharge delay perspective. Full article

This qualitative study explored the development of an innovative simulation training program designed to bolster the preparedness and resilience of healthcare teams during the unprecedented challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Focus groups with interprofessional clinicians illuminated key educational priorities, revealing a need for enhanced safety protocols, clear in communication, and targeted training to address knowledge gaps specific to the novel coronavirus. Recognizing the profound emotional toll of the pandemic, the program also emphasized cultivating compassion and fostering emotional resilience alongside the essential clinical skills. By immersing participants in realistic, evolving scenarios that were reflective of the dynamic COVID-19 landscape, the simulations offered a safe space to rehearse critical skills, practice crisis resource management, and build confidence in navigating the complexities of pandemic care. This tailored approach aimed to empower healthcare teams not only with enhanced knowledge and expertise but also with the emotional fortitude and resilience necessary to provide optimal patient care while safeguarding their own well-being throughout the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The findings highlight the profound potential of simulation-based training to strengthen both individual and systemic resilience within healthcare systems facing the enduring strain of this global health crisis. Full article

Introduction: Diagnostic accuracy is essential for good-quality medical practice, and yet diagnostic errors remain widespread, influencing patient outcomes, healthcare costs, and clinician confidence. “Misdiagnosis Tracker” aims to instil error analysis into medical education and shift the focus toward the learning of lessons from errors in diagnosis. This study investigates how systematic review of diagnostic errors enhances medical students’ competence in diagnostic reasoning, identification of cognitive bias, and identification of atypical presentations. Methods: A cohort of 65 final-year medical students participated in a structured three-phase educational intervention comprising preparation, case study analysis, and reflection. Students examined 20 diagnostic error case studies to identify contributory factors, such as cognitive biases, atypical presentations, and systemic barriers. Quantitative data were obtained from pre- and post-study surveys assessing confidence and knowledge, while qualitative insights were gathered through group reports, reflective journals, and debriefing sessions. Results: The results indicated significant improvements in confidence in diagnostic reasoning (3.0 to 4.4, p < 0.01), awareness of cognitive bias (2.9 to 4.5, p < 0.01), and recognition of atypical presentations (3.1 to 4.6, p < 0.01). Qualitative results highlighted increased insight into red flags, systemic issues, and reflective development. Actionable recommendations made by the students were systematic diagnostic frameworks, better interprofessional communication, and focused education on cognitive bias. Conclusion: This study illustrates how the “Misdiagnosis Tracker” greatly enhances medical students’ reflective and diagnostic reasoning skills and better prepares them for clinical practice. By fostering an environment of learning from diagnostic mistakes, this approach could ultimately result in fewer diagnostic errors and improved patient outcomes. Longitudinal studies are essential to determine the long-term effect of this model on clinical competence and its application in different education settings. Full article

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to specialized domains like medical education, necessitating tailored approaches to evaluate structured responses such as SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation). This study developed an evaluation tool for nursing student responses using LLMs, focusing on word-based learning and assessment methods to align automated scoring with expert evaluations. We propose a three-stage biasing approach: (1) integrating reference answers into the training corpus; (2) incorporating high-scoring student responses; (3) applying domain-critical token weighting through Weighted Noun Embeddings to enhance similarity measurements. By assigning higher weights to critical medical nouns and lower weights to less relevant terms, the embeddings prioritize domain-specific terminology. Employing Word2Vec and FastText models trained on general conversation, medical, and reference answer corpora alongside Sentence-BERT for comparison, our results demonstrate that biasing with reference answers, high-scoring responses, and weighted embeddings improves alignment with human evaluations. Word-based models, particularly after biasing, effectively distinguish high-performing responses from lower ones, as evidenced by increased cosine similarity differences. These findings validate that the proposed methodology enhances the precision and objectivity of evaluating descriptive answers, offering a practical solution for educational settings where fairness and consistency are paramount. Full article

As the US population ages, the number of prescriptions managed by patients and healthcare teams is increasing. Thus, discontinuing or reducing medications that are considered to pose more risks than benefits can be achieved through deprescribing. Despite increasing calls for a stronger focus on deprescribing in healthcare education, current discussions highlight the lack of training on this topic within healthcare curricula. This is a significant barrier to effectively implementing the deprescribing process. This study aimed to characterize healthcare professional students (HPSs)’s perspectives on deprescribing within an interprofessional healthcare team, particularly regarding the motivations and roles of these future practitioners. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with HPSs at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. The data collection, guided by a conceptual model, took place over three months in 2022. Data analysis was performed using thematic analysis, during which themes were identified through inductive coding. Results: Participants (n = 36) represented various faculties, including medicine, pharmacy, health professions, nursing, and dentistry. Two themes emerged: (1) Healthcare Team Members’ Roles and Responsibilities (2) “Put Me in, Coach”: Patient Safety Motivates Deprescribing. Conclusion: Data from HPSs highlighted the importance of an interprofessional healthcare team approach to deprescribing. Based on these insights, educators and practitioners should focus on establishing strong interprofessional healthcare teams that privilege open communication. Teams should consider deprescribing as a patient safety concern, as this may galvanize the team and provide additional motivation for performing the necessary work of deprescribing. Full article

Background: Polypharmacy, commonly defined as the use of five or more medications, is a growing concern in hospitals due to its association with adverse drug reactions, functional decline, and increased healthcare costs. Proactive deprescribing, which involves the planned discontinuation of unnecessary or potentially harmful medications, can optimise medication use. However, multiple barriers hinder its implementation. Saudi Arabia offers a unique context for deprescribing due to strong family roles in care, prevalent prescribing norms, and ongoing shifts toward value-based healthcare. This study explores the barriers and facilitators to proactive deprescribing among physicians in Saudi hospitals using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The TDF was used as it effectively identifies behavioural factors influencing clinical decision making in practice. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 purposively sampled physicians experienced in managing polypharmacy. The interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically, with behavioural determinants identified and categorised according to the 14 domains of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TDF). Results: Enablers included the availability of deprescribing guidelines, decision–support tools, interprofessional collaboration, and institutional backing. Physicians with specialised training expressed greater confidence in conducting deprescribing. Identified barriers included limited time, heavy workload, absence of standardised protocols, medico-legal concerns, resistance from patients and caregivers, and lack of formal training. These factors were categorised under seven key TDF domains, with Environmental Context and Resources, Social Influences, and Beliefs About Capabilities identified as the most influential in shaping physicians’ deprescribing practices. Interactions between factors were observed, where supportive environments and collaborative teams helped offset key barriers such as time constraints, legal concerns, and patient resistance. Conclusions: This study identified key behavioural and contextual factors influencing proactive deprescribing in Saudi hospital settings. Addressing barriers such as heavy workload, medico-legal concerns, and lack of standardised protocols through targeted interventions, including clinician training, institutional support, and multidisciplinary collaboration, may facilitate the integration of deprescribing into routine practice. The findings offer context-specific insights to inform future efforts aimed at improving medication safety and optimising prescribing in the Saudi healthcare system. Full article

The Farmworker Family Health Program (FWFHP) annually supports 600 farmworkers in connectivity-challenged rural areas. Traditional paper-based data collection poses validity concerns, prompting a pilot of direct data entry using tablets and satellite internet to enhance efficiency. The purpose of this article is to describe, using the TIDier checklist, a real-time, live data-entry EMR intervention made possible by satellite internet. Utilizing a customized REDCap database, direct data entry occurred through tablets and satellite internet. Patients received a unique medical record number (MRN) at the mobile health clinic, with an interprofessional team providing care. Medication data, captured in REDCap before the mobile pharmacy visit, exhibited minimal defects at 6.9% of 319 prescriptions. To enhance data collection efficiency, strategies such as limiting free text variables and pre-selecting options were employed. Adequate infrastructure, including tablets with keyboards and barcode scanners, ensured seamless data capture. Wi-Fi extenders improved connectivity in open areas, while backup paper forms were crucial during connectivity disruptions. These practices contributed to enhanced data accuracy. Real-time data entry in connectivity-limited settings is viable. Replacing paper-based methods streamlines healthcare provision, allowing timely collection of occupational and environmental health metrics. The initiative stands as a scalable model for healthcare accessibility, addressing unique challenges in vulnerable communities. Full article

Background: The quality of palliative care (PC) services is closely linked to the effectiveness of interdisciplinary collaboration. A coordinated approach among professionals from different fields fosters holistic, person-centered care, ensuring comprehensive support for patients with complex conditions and their families. In hospital settings, In-Hospital Palliative Care Support Teams (EIHSCPs) play a key role in delivering specialized care, enhancing interdepartmental communication, training other healthcare professionals, and optimizing resources. Strong leadership by PC specialists, combined with effective team management, contributes to symptom relief, improved quality of life, and cost reduction. However, interdisciplinary collaboration presents challenges, including competing priorities, resource constraints, and communication barriers. Despite its recognized benefits, research on its implementation in PC, particularly in Portugal, remains scarce. Objective: This study explores the perspectives and practices of professionals within an EIHSCP, examining team dynamics, interprofessional collaboration, and key facilitators and barriers. Methods: Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians, nurses, psychologists, and social workers from the EIHSCP in the Médio Tejo region. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. Results: The interview findings were organized into three themes: (1) Social Representations and Interdisciplinary Practice; (2) Competencies for Interdisciplinary Practice; and (3) Challenges in Interdisciplinary Practice. Participants consistently highlighted that interdisciplinary collaboration enhances communication between services and improves care quality. While teamwork is central, patient- and family-centered care remains the priority. Key competencies include empathy, ethics, active listening, and cultural sensitivity, alongside structural and procedural elements such as team meetings, integrated communication, and clear referral criteria. Continuous education and professional development are essential. Challenges primarily stem from limited human and material resources, staff workload and stress, communication gaps between hospital and community teams, and insufficient institutional recognition. Suggested improvements focus on investing in ongoing training, strengthening communication and inter-institutional collaboration, and revising the organizational model of PC within Portugal’s National Health Service. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary collaboration in PC is fundamental for holistic, patient-centered care but is hindered by structural and organizational barriers. Full article