Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 4220 KB  
Perspective
Beyond Membrane Potential: Exploiting Signal Complexity in Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators
by Nazarii Frankiv, Haeun Lee and Bradley J. Baker
Sensors 2026, 26(11), 3616; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113616 - 5 Jun 2026
Viewed by 513
Abstract
Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) have long promised optical access to membrane potential, yet their adoption has lagged significantly behind genetically encoded calcium indicators. A central but underappreciated reason is that the metrics used to evaluate and compare GEVIs—fractional fluorescence change (ΔF/F), kinetics, [...] Read more.
Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) have long promised optical access to membrane potential, yet their adoption has lagged significantly behind genetically encoded calcium indicators. A central but underappreciated reason is that the metrics used to evaluate and compare GEVIs—fractional fluorescence change (ΔF/F), kinetics, and signal-to-noise ratio—rest on an assumption that is frequently violated: that GEVI fluorescence reflects a single underlying process. In this perspective, we argue that GEVI signals are composite optical measurements, arising from the superposition of voltage-dependent fluorescence, intracellular and nonresponsive signal, background, and contributions from neighboring cells. Under these conditions, ΔF/F is not a measure of sensor sensitivity but a contrast metric whose value depends on baseline fluorescence composition, optical sampling, and imaging configuration. This reinterpretation has two key consequences. First, it explains a substantial source of variability in GEVI performance that is currently attributed to noise or experimental inconsistency. Second, and more importantly, it reveals that the complexity of GEVI signals is not a limitation to be minimized but a resource to be exploited. By resolving composite signal components, GEVIs can report multiplexed physiological variables, expose hidden conformational states of voltage-sensing domains, probe membrane organization, and reveal intracellular and intercellular electrical coupling. We propose that realizing the full potential of GEVIs requires treating ΔF/F not as a gold standard for sensor performance, but as one interpretable component of a richer optical measurement whose structure encodes multiple layers of cellular physiology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

45 pages, 1119 KB  
Review
Noise Sources and Strategies for Signal Quality Improvement in Biological Imaging: A Review Focused on Calcium and Cell Membrane Voltage Imaging
by Dmitrii M. Nikolaev, Ekaterina M. Metelkina, Andrey A. Shtyrov, Fanghua Li, Maxim S. Panov and Mikhail N. Ryazantsev
Biosensors 2026, 16(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios16010031 - 1 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1722
Abstract
This review addresses the challenges of obtaining high-quality quantitative data in the optical imaging of membrane voltage and calcium dynamics. The paper provides a comprehensive overview and systematization of recent studies that analyze factors limiting signal fidelity and propose strategies to enhance data [...] Read more.
This review addresses the challenges of obtaining high-quality quantitative data in the optical imaging of membrane voltage and calcium dynamics. The paper provides a comprehensive overview and systematization of recent studies that analyze factors limiting signal fidelity and propose strategies to enhance data quality. The primary sources of signal degradation in biological optical imaging, with an emphasis on membrane voltage and calcium imaging, are systematically explored across four major indicator classes: voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs), genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs), calcium-sensitive dyes (CSDs), and genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs). Common mechanisms that compromise data quality are classified into three main categories: fundamental photon shot noise, device-related errors, and sample-related measurement errors. For each class of limitation, its physical or biological origin and characteristic manifestations are described, which are followed by an analysis of available mitigation strategies, including hardware optimization, choice of sensors, sample preparation and experimental design, post-processing and computational correction methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 8683 KB  
Article
From Plankton to Primates: How VSP Sequence Diversity Shapes Voltage Sensing
by Lee Min Leong, Youna Kim and Bradley J. Baker
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(22), 10963; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262210963 - 12 Nov 2025
Viewed by 907
Abstract
Voltage-sensing phosphatases (VSPs) provide a conserved framework for dissecting the mechanics of voltage sensing and for engineering genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs). To evaluate how natural sequence diversity shapes function, we compared VSP voltage-sensing domains (VSDs) from multiple species by replacing the phosphatase [...] Read more.
Voltage-sensing phosphatases (VSPs) provide a conserved framework for dissecting the mechanics of voltage sensing and for engineering genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs). To evaluate how natural sequence diversity shapes function, we compared VSP voltage-sensing domains (VSDs) from multiple species by replacing the phosphatase domain with a fluorescent protein to enable optical detection of VSD responses. Every construct that reached the plasma membrane produced a voltage-dependent optical signal, underscoring the deep conservation of voltage sensing across VSP orthologs. Yet lineage-specific substitutions generated strikingly different phenotypes. A plankton VSP ortholog from Eurytemora carolleeae and the Sea Hare (Aplysia californica) VSP exhibited left-shifted activation ranges, producing robust fluorescence transitions during modest depolarizations of the plasma membrane. The human VSD of hVSP2 yielded weak, sluggish responses with poor recovery, but reintroduction of a conserved arginine in S1 (G95R) partially restored reversibility, implicating lipid-facing residues in conformational stability. The Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus) VSD, with atypical S4 sensing charges (RWIR), generated a slow fluorescence increase during depolarization, while reverting to the consensus arginine (RRIR) inverted the polarity to a decrease. These contrasting behaviors show that single residue changes can reshape how VSD movements influence the fluorescent reporter, highlighting the molecular precision revealed by GEVI measurements. Together, these results show that voltage-dependent signaling is deeply conserved across VSPs but shaped by lineage-specific sequence variation, establishing VSPs as powerful models for probing voltage sensing and guiding GEVI design. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1413 KB  
Review
From the Metabolic Effects and Mechanism of Monovalent Cation Transport to the Actual Measurement of the Plasma Membrane Potential in Yeast
by Antonio Peña, Norma Silvia Sánchez and Martha Calahorra
J. Fungi 2025, 11(7), 522; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11070522 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1396
Abstract
The effects of potassium (K+) on yeast metabolism were documented as early as 1940. Studies proposing a mechanism for its transport started in 1950, and in 1953, a mechanism for the stimulation of fermentation was suggested. However, it was not until [...] Read more.
The effects of potassium (K+) on yeast metabolism were documented as early as 1940. Studies proposing a mechanism for its transport started in 1950, and in 1953, a mechanism for the stimulation of fermentation was suggested. However, it was not until the 1970s that both mechanisms were clarified in Mexico, and the actual internal pH of the cells was measured. The presence of an H+-ATPase that generates an electric plasma membrane difference (PMP), which is used by specific transporters to facilitate the influx of K+ and other cations into the cells, was discovered. For years, many efforts were made to estimate and measure the value of the PMP; the obtained results were variable and erratic. In the 1980s, a methodology was developed to estimate the plasma membrane potential by following the fluorescence changes in the DiSC3(3) dye and measuring its accumulation, which provided actual but inaccurate values. Similar values were obtained by measuring the accumulation of tetraphenylphosphonium. The most reliable method of measuring the actual values of the plasma membrane potential was only recently devised using the also fluorescent dye thioflavin T. This review presents the attempts and outcomes of these experiments necessary to clarify the results reported by different research groups. Innovative research with Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators (GEVIs) is also included. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycological Research in Mexico)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2642 KB  
Article
Engineering of Genetically Encoded Bright Near-Infrared Fluorescent Voltage Indicator
by Xian Xiao, Aimei Yang, Hanbin Zhang, Demian Park, Yangdong Wang, Balint Szabo, Edward S. Boyden and Kiryl D. Piatkevich
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(4), 1442; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26041442 - 8 Feb 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4350
Abstract
Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) allow for the cell-type-specific real-time imaging of neuronal membrane potential dynamics, which is essential to understanding neuronal information processing at both cellular and circuit levels. Among GEVIs, near-infrared-shifted GEVIs offer faster kinetics, better tissue penetration, and compatibility with [...] Read more.
Genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) allow for the cell-type-specific real-time imaging of neuronal membrane potential dynamics, which is essential to understanding neuronal information processing at both cellular and circuit levels. Among GEVIs, near-infrared-shifted GEVIs offer faster kinetics, better tissue penetration, and compatibility with optogenetic tools, enabling all-optical electrophysiology in complex biological contexts. In our previous work, we employed the directed molecular evolution of microbial rhodopsin Archaerhodopsin-3 (Arch-3) in mammalian cells to develop a voltage sensor called Archon1. Archon1 demonstrated excellent membrane localization, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), sensitivity, kinetics, and photostability, and full compatibility with optogenetic tools. However, Archon1 suffers from low brightness and requires high illumination intensities, which leads to tissue heating and phototoxicity during prolonged imaging. In this study, we aim to improve the brightness of this voltage sensor. We performed random mutation on a bright Archon derivative and identified a novel variant, monArch, which exhibits satisfactory voltage sensitivity (4~5% ΔF/FAP) and a 9-fold increase in basal brightness compared with Archon1. However, it is hindered by suboptimal membrane localization and compromised voltage sensitivity. These challenges underscore the need for continued optimization to achieve an optimal balance of brightness, stability, and functionality in rhodopsin-based voltage sensors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dysfunctional Neural Circuits and Impairments in Brain Function)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1968 KB  
Review
Current Practice in Using Voltage Imaging to Record Fast Neuronal Activity: Successful Examples from Invertebrate to Mammalian Studies
by Nikolay Aseyev, Violetta Ivanova, Pavel Balaban and Evgeny Nikitin
Biosensors 2023, 13(6), 648; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13060648 - 13 Jun 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 6992
Abstract
The optical imaging of neuronal activity with potentiometric probes has been credited with being able to address key questions in neuroscience via the simultaneous recording of many neurons. This technique, which was pioneered 50 years ago, has allowed researchers to study the dynamics [...] Read more.
The optical imaging of neuronal activity with potentiometric probes has been credited with being able to address key questions in neuroscience via the simultaneous recording of many neurons. This technique, which was pioneered 50 years ago, has allowed researchers to study the dynamics of neural activity, from tiny subthreshold synaptic events in the axon and dendrites at the subcellular level to the fluctuation of field potentials and how they spread across large areas of the brain. Initially, synthetic voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs) were applied directly to brain tissue via staining, but recent advances in transgenic methods now allow the expression of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs), specifically in selected neuron types. However, voltage imaging is technically difficult and limited by several methodological constraints that determine its applicability in a given type of experiment. The prevalence of this method is far from being comparable to patch clamp voltage recording or similar routine methods in neuroscience research. There are more than twice as many studies on VSDs as there are on GEVIs. As can be seen from the majority of the papers, most of them are either methodological ones or reviews. However, potentiometric imaging is able to address key questions in neuroscience by recording most or many neurons simultaneously, thus providing unique information that cannot be obtained via other methods. Different types of optical voltage indicators have their advantages and limitations, which we focus on in detail. Here, we summarize the experience of the scientific community in the application of voltage imaging and try to evaluate the contribution of this method to neuroscience research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3552 KB  
Article
Cortical Correlates of Psychedelic-Induced Shaking Behavior Revealed by Voltage Imaging
by Tobias Buchborn, Taylor Lyons, Chenchen Song, Amanda Feilding and Thomas Knöpfel
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(11), 9463; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119463 - 30 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5732
Abstract
(1) From mouse to man, shaking behavior (head twitches and/or wet dog shakes) is a reliable readout of psychedelic drug action. Shaking behavior like psychedelia is thought to be mediated by serotonin 2A receptors on cortical pyramidal cells. The involvement of pyramidal cells [...] Read more.
(1) From mouse to man, shaking behavior (head twitches and/or wet dog shakes) is a reliable readout of psychedelic drug action. Shaking behavior like psychedelia is thought to be mediated by serotonin 2A receptors on cortical pyramidal cells. The involvement of pyramidal cells in psychedelic-induced shaking behavior remains hypothetical, though, as experimental in vivo evidence is limited. (2) Here, we use cell type-specific voltage imaging in awake mice to address this issue. We intersectionally express the genetically encoded voltage indicator VSFP Butterfly 1.2 in layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons. We simultaneously capture cortical hemodynamics and cell type-specific voltage activity while mice display psychedelic shaking behavior. (3) Shaking behavior is preceded by high-frequency oscillations and overlaps with low-frequency oscillations in the motor cortex. Oscillations spectrally mirror the rhythmics of shaking behavior and reflect layer 2/3 pyramidal cell activity complemented by hemodynamics. (4) Our results reveal a clear cortical fingerprint of serotonin-2A-receptor-mediated shaking behavior and open a promising methodological avenue relating a cross-mammalian psychedelic effect to cell-type specific brain dynamics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Serotonin in Brain Function)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 5589 KB  
Article
Zebrafish Embryos Display Characteristic Bioelectric Signals during Early Development
by Martin R. Silic, Ziyu Dong, Yueyi Chen, Adam Kimbrough and Guangjun Zhang
Cells 2022, 11(22), 3586; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11223586 - 12 Nov 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5826
Abstract
Bioelectricity is defined as endogenous electrical signaling mediated by the dynamic distribution of charged molecules. Recently, increasing evidence has revealed that cellular bioelectric signaling is critical for regulating embryonic development, regeneration, and congenital diseases. However, systematic real-time in vivo dynamic electrical activity monitoring [...] Read more.
Bioelectricity is defined as endogenous electrical signaling mediated by the dynamic distribution of charged molecules. Recently, increasing evidence has revealed that cellular bioelectric signaling is critical for regulating embryonic development, regeneration, and congenital diseases. However, systematic real-time in vivo dynamic electrical activity monitoring of whole organisms has been limited, mainly due to the lack of a suitable model system and voltage measurement tools for in vivo biology. Here, we addressed this gap by utilizing a genetically stable zebrafish line, Tg (ubiquitin: ASAP1), and ASAP1 (Accelerated sensor of action potentials 1), a genetically encoded voltage indicator (GEVI). With light-sheet microscopy, we systematically investigated cell membrane potential (Vm) signals during different embryonic stages. We found cells of zebrafish embryos showed local membrane hyperpolarization at the cleavage furrows during the cleavage period of embryogenesis. This signal appeared before cytokinesis and fluctuated as it progressed. In contrast, whole-cell transient hyperpolarization was observed during the blastula and gastrula stages. These signals were generally limited to the superficial blastomere, but they could be detected within the deeper cells during the gastrulation period. Moreover, the zebrafish embryos exhibit tissue-level cell Vm signals during the segmentation period. Middle-aged somites had strong and dynamic Vm fluctuations starting at about the 12-somite stage. These embryonic stage-specific characteristic cellular bioelectric signals suggest that they might play a diverse role in zebrafish embryogenesis that could underlie human congenital diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Bioelectricity and Cell Behaviour)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 3036 KB  
Review
Drug Screening with Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Sensors: Today and Tomorrow
by Ekaterina S. Potekhina, Dina Y. Bass, Ilya V. Kelmanson, Elena S. Fetisova, Alexander V. Ivanenko, Vsevolod V. Belousov and Dmitry S. Bilan
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(1), 148; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010148 - 25 Dec 2020
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 10337
Abstract
Genetically-encoded fluorescent sensors have been actively developed over the last few decades and used in live imaging and drug screening. Real-time monitoring of drug action in a specific cellular compartment, organ, or tissue type; the ability to screen at the single-cell resolution; and [...] Read more.
Genetically-encoded fluorescent sensors have been actively developed over the last few decades and used in live imaging and drug screening. Real-time monitoring of drug action in a specific cellular compartment, organ, or tissue type; the ability to screen at the single-cell resolution; and the elimination of false-positive results caused by low drug bioavailability that is not detected by in vitro testing methods are a few of the obvious benefits of using genetically-encoded fluorescent sensors in drug screening. In combination with high-throughput screening (HTS), some genetically-encoded fluorescent sensors may provide high reproducibility and robustness to assays. We provide a brief overview of successful, perspective, and hopeful attempts at using genetically encoded fluorescent sensors in HTS of modulators of ion channels, Ca2+ homeostasis, GPCR activity, and for screening cytotoxic, anticancer, and anti-parasitic compounds. We discuss the advantages of sensors in whole organism drug screening models and the perspectives of the combination of human disease modeling by CRISPR techniques with genetically encoded fluorescent sensors for drug screening. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2012 KB  
Review
Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators in Circulation Research
by Lars Kaestner, Qinghai Tian, Elisabeth Kaiser, Wenying Xian, Andreas Müller, Martin Oberhofer, Sandra Ruppenthal, Daniel Sinnecker, Hidekazu Tsutsui, Atsushi Miyawaki, Alessandra Moretti and Peter Lipp
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(9), 21626-21642; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160921626 - 8 Sep 2015
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 12636
Abstract
Membrane potentials display the cellular status of non-excitable cells and mediate communication between excitable cells via action potentials. The use of genetically encoded biosensors employing fluorescent proteins allows a non-invasive biocompatible way to read out the membrane potential in cardiac myocytes and other [...] Read more.
Membrane potentials display the cellular status of non-excitable cells and mediate communication between excitable cells via action potentials. The use of genetically encoded biosensors employing fluorescent proteins allows a non-invasive biocompatible way to read out the membrane potential in cardiac myocytes and other cells of the circulation system. Although the approaches to design such biosensors date back to the time when the first fluorescent-protein based Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) sensors were constructed, it took 15 years before reliable sensors became readily available. Here, we review different developments of genetically encoded membrane potential sensors. Furthermore, it is shown how such sensors can be used in pharmacological screening applications as well as in circulation related basic biomedical research. Potentials and limitations will be discussed and perspectives of possible future developments will be provided. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Protein Based Biosensors)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop