Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (797)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gastroesophageal

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 633 KB  
Review
Current and Emerging Targeted Therapy in Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
by Oliver Oakley, Umair Mahmood, Yusuf Ahmad and Elizabeth Smyth
Pharmaceuticals 2026, 19(9), 1420; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19091420 - 8 Sep 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) carries a poor prognosis, with median overall survival of 13–20 months despite standard chemotherapy. Since trastuzumab’s approval, biomarker-driven precision therapies have expanded rapidly. This review comprehensively summarises current and emerging targeted agents across the key molecular targets [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) carries a poor prognosis, with median overall survival of 13–20 months despite standard chemotherapy. Since trastuzumab’s approval, biomarker-driven precision therapies have expanded rapidly. This review comprehensively summarises current and emerging targeted agents across the key molecular targets driving advanced GEA. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searching English-language human studies published between February and July 2026, supplemented by updates during editing to reflect current standards. Results: HER2-directed therapy has progressed from trastuzumab through dual blockade, immunotherapy combinations, next-generation ADCs (notably trastuzumab deruxtecan) and bispecific antibodies such as zanidatamab, which has now overtaken trastuzumab in the first-line setting. CLDN18.2-targeted zolbetuximab has demonstrated survival benefit in biomarker-selected patients, with newer ADCs, BiTEs and the first approved solid-tumour CAR-T therapy (satricabtagene autoleucel) extending this target further. VEGFR2 inhibition with ramucirumab remains a cornerstone in later lines, while novel VEGF/PD-1(L1) bispecifics are under investigation. FGFR2b-targeted bemarituzumab showed early promise that weakened on phase 3 confirmation, and MET/EGFR-directed agents, including savolitinib and amivantamab, require stringent biomarker selection to demonstrate benefit amid tumour heterogeneity. Conclusions: Novel targeted agents, particularly to HER2 and CLDN18.2, have demonstrated survival benefit despite ongoing challenges. Other lines are more investigational. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Targeted Therapy for Gastrointestinal Cancers)
18 pages, 3017 KB  
Article
Respiratory Morbidity After Repair of Type C Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula: A Pediatric Case Series
by Cristiana Sophia Mihordea, Tudor-Gabriel Neagu, Daniela Pop, Oana Maria Mitrașca, Anca-Valina Gîngă, Edita-Gabriela Ichim, Valentina Sas, Sorin Claudiu Man and Paraschiva Chereches-Panta
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(17), 6922; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15176922 - 7 Sep 2026
Abstract
Background: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare congenital malformation of the foregut, most commonly presenting in association with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). Advances in neonatal surgical techniques and intensive care have significantly improved survival rates over recent decades. However, short- and long-term respiratory morbidity [...] Read more.
Background: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare congenital malformation of the foregut, most commonly presenting in association with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). Advances in neonatal surgical techniques and intensive care have significantly improved survival rates over recent decades. However, short- and long-term respiratory morbidity remains prevalent, substantially impacting patients’ quality of life. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center case series of pediatric patients with repaired EA, with emphasis on the spectrum of pulmonary complications and their clinical management. Six patients with repaired type C EA with TEF and associated respiratory complications were included. All patients were admitted between 2018 and 2026 to the Third Pediatric Clinic, Clinical Hospital for Pediatric Emergencies, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, for the management of respiratory pathology. Results: Tracheomalacia was identified in all six patients, and each had experienced at least one episode of lower respiratory tract infection. Reactive airway disease meeting diagnostic criteria for asthma was documented in two patients. One case raised clinical suspicion for a residual or recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula, warranting further diagnostic workup. Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was present in all patients. Protein-energy malnutrition was identified in two patients (30% of the cohort). Conclusions: Surgically repaired EA is frequently associated with considerable chronic respiratory and gastrointestinal morbidity. A structured multidisciplinary approach, including pediatric pulmonology, gastroenterology, surgery and nutrition, alongside systematic long-term follow-up, is essential to optimize outcomes and quality of life in this vulnerable patient population. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 494 KB  
Article
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Is Associated with Low Absolute Rates of Orofacial Adverse Events and Significantly Less When Compared to Hemopoietic Stem Cell Therapy
by Stella O. Oyewole, Emma Butler, Sagun D. Goyal and Adepitan A. Owosho
Dent. J. 2026, 14(9), 549; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14090549 - 1 Sep 2026
Viewed by 149
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has been approved for the management of relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies, transforming the oncologic landscape and producing durable remissions in patient populations with limited alternatives. The systemic adverse events of CAR-T are well characterized; however, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has been approved for the management of relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies, transforming the oncologic landscape and producing durable remissions in patient populations with limited alternatives. The systemic adverse events of CAR-T are well characterized; however, the orofacial adverse events have not been well described. The objective of this study is to leverage a large, de-identified, real-world dataset to (1) estimate the prevalence of orofacial adverse events following CAR-T, (2) compare event rates with the general population, and (3) directly contrast the orofacial toxicity burden of CAR-T with that observed after hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using de-identified electronic health record data from TriNetX. CAR-T and HSCT cohorts were identified via RxNorm and procedure codes; a non-exposed control cohort was included. Patients with prior orofacial conditions or confounding therapies were excluded. New adverse orofacial events within one year were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. Cohorts were 1:1 propensity-matched by age and sex; associations were estimated as odds ratios with two-sided 95% CIs. Results: In 1142 CAR-T recipients (mean age of 62), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was most frequent (5.18%). Oral mucosal events included stomatitis in 1.52%, mucositis in 1.31%, and lichenoid reactions in 1.03%. Dysphagia occurred in 1.8% and oral candidiasis in 1.6%. Several severe oral conditions were absent. Compared with the general population (CART vs. general population): mucositis—[12/995 vs. 0/1112] (OR 28.3)—and stomatitis—[16/987 vs. 0/1119] (OR 38)—risks were significantly increased, while CAR-T patients had significant lower risks of mucosal complications than HSCT recipients in this analysis (CART vs. HSCT): mucositis—[1.21% vs. 3.72%] (OR 0.316) and stomatitis—[1.42% vs. 3.91%] (OR 0.354). Conclusions: CAR-T therapy carries a distinct and generally lower orofacial toxicity burden than HSCT, but targeted dental assessment and prospective surveillance remain important to optimize supportive care for cellular therapy recipients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Oncology: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 728 KB  
Article
Frequency of Allergic Rhinitis Among Phenotypes of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Patients Treated Surgically: An Experience from a University Hospital
by Aleksandra Stajić, Selena Zečević, Jelena Sotirović, Danilo Vojvodić, Snežana Babac and Aleksandar Perić
Immuno 2026, 6(3), 57; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno6030057 - 31 Aug 2026
Viewed by 186
Abstract
Background/Objective: Previous studies on the association between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and allergic rhinitis (AR) have mostly focused on the general population, and much less on patients with CRS requiring surgical treatment. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of perennial and seasonal [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Previous studies on the association between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and allergic rhinitis (AR) have mostly focused on the general population, and much less on patients with CRS requiring surgical treatment. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of perennial and seasonal AR (PAR and SAR, respectively) among CRS patients in whom it was necessary to apply surgical treatment, including those with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and those without (CRSsNP). Methods: A three-year retrospective study from a single center included CRS patients with indications for surgical treatment. The patients were not previously treated surgically. Several clinical parameters were considered: frequency of AR, PAR, SAR, SAR+PAR, asthma, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Total serum IgE, percentage of eosinophils in peripheral blood, and Lund–Mackay computed tomography (CT) score (LMS) were also determined. Correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationships among the clinical parameters, while multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine their independent associations with the outcome and to identify the best independent predictor. Results: A total of 155 patients with CRS were considered. Over 70% were patients with CRSwNP. AR was significantly more prevalent in patients with CRSwNP (p = 0.049), with PAR being the more common form (p = 0.035). Also, GERD and asthma were more common in CRSwNP (p = 0.01 and p = 0.001, respectively). The strongest correlation was found between total serum IgE and percentage of eosinophils (rho = 0.776; p < 0.001), then between percentage of eosinophils and LMS (rho = 0.760; p < 0.001), as well as between total IgE and LMS (rho = 0.695; p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis identified LMS as the only independent statistically significant predictor for CRSwNP (OR = 1.381, p < 0.001) among all numerical parameters. Conclusions: The results suggest a better association between PAR and CRS, especially with CRSwNP. Asthma and GERD are also highly associated, primarily with CRSwNP. LMS is the best independent predictor for the presence of CRSwNP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mucosal Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4451 KB  
Review
Immunotherapy for Digestive System Cancers: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
by Keran Sun, Hongru Li, Hao Chi, Yuxuan Song, Yunze Niu, Jingyuan Ning and Hengrui Liu
Biomedicines 2026, 14(9), 1919; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14091919 - 27 Aug 2026
Viewed by 398
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade has changed the management of several digestive system cancers, but its impact is highly context dependent. This review evaluates evidence for esophageal, gastric and gastroesophageal junction, colorectal, hepatocellular, biliary tract and gallbladder, and pancreatic cancers. Randomized phase III trials have [...] Read more.
Immune checkpoint blockade has changed the management of several digestive system cancers, but its impact is highly context dependent. This review evaluates evidence for esophageal, gastric and gastroesophageal junction, colorectal, hepatocellular, biliary tract and gallbladder, and pancreatic cancers. Randomized phase III trials have established chemoimmunotherapy or dual-checkpoint strategies in advanced esophageal cancer, biomarker- and regimen-dependent first-line therapy in gastric cancer, PD-1-based therapy for MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer, atezolizumab–bevacizumab and STRIDE for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, and chemoimmunotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer. Recent results also expand perioperative treatment: neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade produces high pathological response rates in dMMR colon cancer, adjuvant atezolizumab plus mFOLFOX6 improves disease-free survival in stage III dMMR colon cancer, and perioperative serplulimab improves event-free survival in PD-L1-positive resectable gastric cancer. These advances coexist with important negative findings. Pembrolizumab-containing therapy did not meet superiority end points in KEYNOTE-062, the initial adjuvant signal in IMbrave050 was not sustained, and unselected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains largely resistant to checkpoint blockade. Early vaccine, cellular, TIGIT, radiomics, spatial, and multi-omics studies remain hypothesis-generating and require external or randomized validation. Clinical interpretation should integrate evidence maturity, biomarker validity, immune-related toxicity, patient-reported outcomes, cost, access, and manufacturing demands rather than response rate alone. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Genetics: Bench-to-Bedside​ Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 972 KB  
Systematic Review
Quality of Outcome Reporting for Older Subgroups in FDA Registration Gastroesophageal Cancer Trials (2010–2024): A Systematic Review
by Ilse Trip, Martha Kormi, Elizabeth Smyth, Russell D. Petty and Mark A. Baxter
Cancers 2026, 18(17), 2747; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18172747 - 24 Aug 2026
Viewed by 212
Abstract
Background: Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is predominantly a disease of older adults. However, older adults are underrepresented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and outcomes specific to this subgroup are underreported. Clinicians therefore extrapolate data from younger, fitter trial populations, which can lead to over- [...] Read more.
Background: Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is predominantly a disease of older adults. However, older adults are underrepresented in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and outcomes specific to this subgroup are underreported. Clinicians therefore extrapolate data from younger, fitter trial populations, which can lead to over- and undertreatment of older cancer patients. This study examines the inclusion and completeness of outcome reporting for older patients in practice-changing trials in gastroesophageal cancer. Methods: RCTs were identified from United States Food and Drug Administration (accelerated) approvals between 2010 and 2024. The primary study report, clinicaltrial.gov repository and all relevant secondary publications were assessed for the level of reporting of outcomes. Efficacy outcomes were reported as complete, partial, qualitative or quantitative based on availability of sample size, effect size and measures of precision. Baseline characteristics, toxicity outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were assessed using minimum data thresholds. Results: In total, 13 trials, 53 publications and 13 repository webpages were assessed. A total of 9320 patients were included, of which 40.1% were classified as older adults. Among the patients, 42.2% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of 0, with all but one trial excluding patients with an ECOG PS of 2 (n = 63). Baseline characteristics and toxicity outcomes for older adults were fully reported in only two trials (15.4%). Reporting of HRQOL outcomes (25.0%), secondary (20.0%) and primary endpoints (66.7%) was more complete. Overall survival (76.9%) and progression-free survival (67.0%) were the most commonly reported primary or secondary endpoints. Conclusions: This study highlights deficits in the outcome reporting of older cancer patients in GOA trials. Simultaneously, this subgroup also remains heavily underrepresented in GOA trials compared to the real-world patient population. These findings highlight the need for improvements in both trial design and outcome reporting standards for older adults. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer and Aging: Challenges in Geriatric Cancer Survivorship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1433 KB  
Article
Clinicopathological Predictors of Pathological Response and Survival in Older Patients Undergoing Perioperative FLOT Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
by Aykut Özmen, Tuba Tahtalı, Gündüz Karaoğlan, Mehmet Kutlay, Ulviye Oflas, Tanju Kapağan, Nilüfer Bulut and Gökmen Umut Erdem
Medicina 2026, 62(8), 1612; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62081612 - 21 Aug 2026
Viewed by 288
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Evidence regarding predictors of pathological response and long-term outcomes in older patients receiving perioperative FLOT chemotherapy for resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer remains limited. We aimed to identify factors associated with pathological response and survival in patients aged [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Evidence regarding predictors of pathological response and long-term outcomes in older patients receiving perioperative FLOT chemotherapy for resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer remains limited. We aimed to identify factors associated with pathological response and survival in patients aged ≥65 years treated with neoadjuvant FLOT. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 86 consecutive patients (median age, 69 years; 72.1% male) aged ≥65 years with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant FLOT chemotherapy followed by curative-intent gastrectomy. Major pathological response was defined as College of American Pathologists tumor regression grade (CAP TRG) 0–1. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of pathological response. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Results: Overall, 14 patients (16.3%) achieved a major pathological response. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 (OR 5.13, p = 0.04) was independently associated with a major pathological response. During a median follow-up of 29.2 months, 39 patients (45.3%) developed recurrence and 35 (40.7%) died. ECOG performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 1 was independently associated with both inferior DFS (HR = 2.76, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 2.52, p = 0.045). In addition, ypN stage 2–3 (HR = 2.58, p = 0.008) was independently associated with worse DFS, whereas positive surgical margins were independently associated with worse OS (HR = 2.62, p = 0.02). Conclusions: In older patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative FLOT chemotherapy, baseline BMI was independently associated with major pathological response, whereas ECOG PS and postoperative pathological factors were independently associated with survival. These findings highlight the importance of careful patient selection and individualized multimodal treatment in this population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

52 pages, 19677 KB  
Review
Biological and Targeted Therapies in the Multidisciplinary Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers
by Marek Kos, Krzysztof Bojarski, Milena Czosnek, Jan Śnieżyński, Bartosz Wilczyński, Paulina Mertowska, Ewelina Grywalska and Sebastian Mertowski
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2675; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162675 - 18 Aug 2026
Viewed by 332
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a diverse group of malignancies that remain a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Their management is increasingly complex, reflecting differences in tumor biology, anatomical location, stage, and molecular profile. In recent years, advances in molecular diagnostics, [...] Read more.
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a diverse group of malignancies that remain a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Their management is increasingly complex, reflecting differences in tumor biology, anatomical location, stage, and molecular profile. In recent years, advances in molecular diagnostics, immunotherapy, and targeted treatment have moved clinical decision-making beyond a purely organ- and stage-based approach toward more individualized, biomarker-guided care. This narrative review summarizes established and emerging biological and targeted therapies used in esophageal, gastric and gastroesophageal junction, colorectal, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and biliary tract cancers. It focuses on immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4; HER2-directed monoclonal antibodies and antibody–drug conjugates; antiangiogenic and anti-EGFR therapies; and newer strategies involving CLDN18.2, FGFR2b, and tumor-agnostic alterations such as NTRK fusions. The review also considers the predictive biomarkers used to guide treatment selection and the growing integration of systemic therapy with surgery in neoadjuvant, perioperative, adjuvant, and conversion settings. However, clinical efficacy alone does not determine whether new treatments become part of routine practice. Regulatory approval, reimbursement, access to molecular testing, and the availability of specialized multidisciplinary care are equally important. The rapidly evolving treatment landscape for GI cancers therefore requires clinical decisions that account for tumor biology, anatomical resectability, molecular eligibility, expected benefit, treatment-related toxicity, and local access to therapy. Expanding access to comprehensive biomarker testing and effective molecularly guided treatments will be essential to translate progress in precision oncology into more personalized and equitable care for patients with GI cancers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 597 KB  
Systematic Review
Perioperative Care of Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Current Evidence and Clinical Considerations—A Scoping Review
by Ioana Roxana Codru and Liliana Vecerzan
Cancers 2026, 18(16), 2654; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18162654 - 17 Aug 2026
Viewed by 420
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have moved from the metastatic setting into neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and fully perioperative strategies across several solid tumors. This shift has created a new clinical interface between medical oncology, surgery, anesthesia, pathology and postoperative care because immune activation [...] Read more.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have moved from the metastatic setting into neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and fully perioperative strategies across several solid tumors. This shift has created a new clinical interface between medical oncology, surgery, anesthesia, pathology and postoperative care because immune activation may improve pathological response and survival while also generating immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that mimic or aggravate perioperative complications. Methods: We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-ScR. PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for studies published between 2016 and 2026 that evaluated adult patients with solid tumors receiving ICIs in relation to surgery. Thirty-three studies were included and synthesized descriptively across surgical feasibility, perioperative safety, irAEs, anesthetic considerations, and oncological outcomes. Results: The strongest evidence was found in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer, where neoadjuvant or perioperative ICI-based regimens improved pathological response and, in several trials, event-free or overall survival. Evidence in triple-negative breast, bladder, gastric/gastroesophageal junction, and ovarian cancers supported broader applicability but remained heterogeneous, with variable efficacy across tumor types and treatment regimens. Surgery following ICI exposure was generally feasible, without a consistent increase in postoperative mortality. However, pneumonitis, myocarditis, endocrinopathies, hepatitis, colitis, and cytokine release syndrome may mimic conventional postoperative complications. Direct evidence comparing anesthetic or perioperative management strategies was scarce. Conclusions: Perioperative ICI-based therapy is no longer an experimental concept, but its safe implementation requires structured preoperative screening, individualized surgical timing, organ-specific toxicity surveillance, careful corticosteroid decision-making, and close multidisciplinary communication. Future prospective studies should integrate standardized perioperative endpoints, anesthesia-related variables, biomarker-driven risk stratification, and long-term oncological outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 847 KB  
Article
Integrated Prognostic Stratification After Perioperative FLOT in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study
by Seda Jeral Evinç, Zeliha Birsin, Selin Cebeci, Ahmet Başgöze, Çağla Eyüpler Akmercan, Tuğba Kaya, Burak Paçacı, Murat Sarı, İlknur Deliktaş Onur, Ayberk Bayramgil, Özgecan Dülger Kaya, Lamia Şeker Can, Hamza Abbasov, Emir Çerme, Ebru Çiçek, Süheyla Atak, Süleyman Sami Güzel, Kubilay Tay, Nebi Serkan Demirci and Özkan Alan
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(16), 6300; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15166300 - 14 Aug 2026
Viewed by 320
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Outcomes after perioperative FLOT for gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma remain variable, even among patients treated with curative intent. Although postoperative pathological findings are central to risk assessment, they do not fully capture patient-related factors that may influence recovery, treatment completion, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Outcomes after perioperative FLOT for gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma remain variable, even among patients treated with curative intent. Although postoperative pathological findings are central to risk assessment, they do not fully capture patient-related factors that may influence recovery, treatment completion, and survival. This multicenter study evaluated routinely available clinical, laboratory, and pathological variables and assessed whether integrating these variables could improve postoperative prognostic stratification. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 173 patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated with perioperative FLOT across seven oncology centers in Türkiye. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Baseline inflammatory/nutritional status, pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), postoperative nodal status, and comorbidity burden were assessed. An exploratory modified FLOT Prognostic Score (mFPS) was constructed by assigning one point each for high inflammatory/nutritional risk, elevated CEA, ypN-positive disease, and age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 5. Results: At a median follow-up of 39.7 months, median OS was 41.4 months, with estimated 2-year and 5-year OS rates of 69% and 44%, respectively. Surgery was performed in 164 patients, and 83 patients completed planned adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariable analysis, ypN-positive disease, higher comorbidity burden, and high inflammatory/nutritional risk were independently associated with shorter OS. Among the 126 patients with complete data available for all score components, the mFPS stratified patients into groups with significantly different outcomes: median overall survival was not reached in the low-risk group, compared with 56.1 months in the intermediate-risk group and 18.7 months in the high-risk group. Conclusions: Survival after perioperative FLOT was not determined by residual disease burden alone. Integrating postoperative nodal status with baseline host-related factors may help identify patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes following curative-intent treatment. The proposed score should be considered exploratory and requires external validation before clinical application. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 794 KB  
Systematic Review
Survival and Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Esophagogastric Cancer: A Systematic Review
by Raluca-Elena Marica, Adelina Băloi, Marius Păpurică, Ciprian-Mihai Gândac, Claudiu-Rafael Bârsac, Justin-Ștefan Paraschiv, Gabi-Valeriu Dincă, Cristian-Daniel Marica, Bogdan Socea, Ovidiu-Horea Bedreag, Dorel Săndesc and Gabriel-Petre Gorecki
Diagnostics 2026, 16(16), 2524; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16162524 - 11 Aug 2026
Viewed by 289
Abstract
Background: Esophagogastric cancer (EGC), encompassing oesophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and proximal gastric malignancies, remains a major contributor to global cancer mortality. Neoadjuvant therapy, chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is now standard for locally advanced, resectable disease. However, variability in treatment response and [...] Read more.
Background: Esophagogastric cancer (EGC), encompassing oesophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and proximal gastric malignancies, remains a major contributor to global cancer mortality. Neoadjuvant therapy, chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is now standard for locally advanced, resectable disease. However, variability in treatment response and survival outcomes continues to challenge therapeutic optimisation. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and included studies published between January 2020 and September 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adult patients with resectable EGC treated with neoadjuvant CT or CRT, reporting data on pathological response (pathological complete response (pCR) or tumour regression grade (TRG)) and survival outcomes [overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS)]. Sixty studies (18 randomised controlled trials and 42 cohort analyses) were included for qualitative synthesis. Results: Across all regimens, pCR rates ranged from 8% to 49%, with CRT achieving higher pCR (mean 33%) and major TRG response (63%) compared to CT alone (pCR 22%, TRG 48%). Immunotherapy-enhanced protocols (IO-CRT and IO-CT) demonstrated the most promising outcomes, reaching mean pCR rates up to 48–50%. Patients with complete or major regression consistently achieved superior OS and DFS, confirming pathological response as a consistent prognostic marker for long-term survival. Significant clinical heterogeneity was observed across histological subtypes (SCC vs. AC), treatment intensity, and surgical timing, while methodological heterogeneity stemmed from variations in TRG systems, follow-up duration, and reporting standards. Conclusions: Pathological response is consistently associated with survival following neoadjuvant therapy in EGC, yet its predictive power is modulated by tumour histology and treatment modality. Standardisation of TRG assessment, integration of molecular biomarkers, and harmonisation of study design are essential for improving comparability and advancing personalised, multimodal strategies in oesophagogastric oncology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abdominal Diseases: Diagnosis, Treatment and Management—2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1030 KB  
Article
Preoperative Factors Including Endoscopic Findings in Predicting Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) After Sleeve Gastrectomy: An Observational Cohort Study
by Justyna Rymarowicz, Mateusz Michalczak, Izabela Powalacz, Jakub Michalczak, Anna Dąbrowska, Józefina Jamsran and Piotr Major
Obesities 2026, 6(4), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities6040058 - 9 Aug 2026
Viewed by 329
Abstract
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease remains a common postoperative issue after sleeve gastrectomy. This study examined whether preoperative symptoms, clinical factors, and endoscopic findings predict reflux symptoms one year after surgery. Methods: We performed an observational cohort study including 207 patients who underwent sleeve [...] Read more.
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease remains a common postoperative issue after sleeve gastrectomy. This study examined whether preoperative symptoms, clinical factors, and endoscopic findings predict reflux symptoms one year after surgery. Methods: We performed an observational cohort study including 207 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Preoperative variables included age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, preexisting GERD symptoms, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) results. GERD symptoms were evaluated at 1 year. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with GERD after surgery, GERD resolution, and de novo GERD. Results: One year after SG, the prevalence of GERD increased from 45% to 60% (p = 0.003). Preexisting GERD symptoms (OR 2.54 (95% CI 1.39–4.63, p = 0.002) and lower preoperative BMI (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.88–0.99; p = 0.027) were independently linked to GERD after surgery. Among patients with preoperative GERD, higher preoperative BMI was associated with symptom resolution (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03–1.21; p = 0.011). Neither Hill classification nor mild-to-moderate (Los Angeles grade A/B) esophagitis on EGD predicted GERD outcomes. Conclusions: Preexisting GERD symptoms and BMI were the most reliable predictors of GERD after surgery. Preoperative Hill classification and esophagitis showed no significant association in this cohort. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 719 KB  
Article
A Preliminary Study on the Benefits of Bicarbonate Natural Mineral Water from Source ‘Aqua 3’ on Dyspeptic Symptoms and Digestion
by Alessandro Zanasi, Fabio Pace, Giorgio Zoli, Aladin Abu Issa and Antonio Maria Morselli-Labate
Gastroenterol. Insights 2026, 17(3), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent17030044 - 9 Aug 2026
Viewed by 394
Abstract
Background: The intake of mineral water for therapeutic purposes (crenotherapy) in digestive system disorders is a long-established practice, but there are still few controlled clinical studies confirming the effects of natural mineral water rich in bicarbonate. Objective: To verify whether the daily intake [...] Read more.
Background: The intake of mineral water for therapeutic purposes (crenotherapy) in digestive system disorders is a long-established practice, but there are still few controlled clinical studies confirming the effects of natural mineral water rich in bicarbonate. Objective: To verify whether the daily intake of Aqua 3 bicarbonate natural mineral water is able to improve digestion in a population of patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of functional dyspepsia, formulated in accordance with the Rome IV criteria, were subjected to three 2-week intake periods: a tap water period (wash-out), a bicarbonate natural mineral water period, and an oligomineral water period. The mineral water bottles were anonymized by removing the identifying labels. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders–Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) total score. The secondary endpoints were: improvements in the PAGI-SYM subscale scores, the use of antacids, and the self-assessment of efficacy of digestion. Power analysis indicated that a minimum of 48 pairs were required and, to ensure adequate sample size, 50 subjects were enrolled. Results: The PAGI-SYM total score and the six subscale scores significantly decreased after bicarbonate mineral water intake and significantly increased after oligomineral water supplementation. During the bicarbonate mineral water period, antacid use decreased significantly, with nine patients discontinuing antacid medication (p = 0.004). During the subsequent oligomineral water period, antacid use increased, with seven patients requiring new antacid administration, although this increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.070). The comparison between changes observed during the bicarbonate and oligomineral water periods was significant (p = 0.005). In addition, the scores of the patients’ subjective assessments of the effectiveness of their digestion were significantly better after the intake of bicarbonate water than after intake of oligomineral water. Conclusions: In line with the evidence reported in the literature, the preliminary findings suggest that the intake of Aqua 3 bicarbonate mineral water may alleviate dyspeptic and reflux-related symptoms and improve digestive effectiveness in patients with functional dyspepsia. Given the exploratory design, small sample size, and fixed treatment sequence, these results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in adequately powered randomized controlled trials. The intake of Aqua 3 bicarbonate mineral water proved to be a simple, safe, and natural intervention capable of improving digestive symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia and reflux-related disorders while promoting the digestive process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Alimentary Tract)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 22386 KB  
Article
Sustainable Valorization of Aloe vera Skin: Development of a New Emulgel with Anti-Inflammatory Properties
by Jessica Ceramella, Elisabetta Bruno, Maria Stefania Sinicropi, Francesca Romana Lupi, Vincenzo Sicari, Antonio Gattuso, Carlos Fernandes, Daniel Chavarria, Filomena Conforti, Giancarlo Statti, Mary Fucile, Carlo Maria Scornajenghi, Fernanda Borges, Domenico Iacopetta and Domenico Gabriele
Molecules 2026, 31(15), 2735; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31152735 - 6 Aug 2026
Viewed by 389
Abstract
Aloe vera is a renowned phytotherapeutic plant characterized by a highly dynamic chemical profile and endowed with a broad spectrum of biological activities. Industrial processing of A. vera focuses almost exclusively on the inner parenchyma (AG), discarding the epidermal tissue (AS) as waste. [...] Read more.
Aloe vera is a renowned phytotherapeutic plant characterized by a highly dynamic chemical profile and endowed with a broad spectrum of biological activities. Industrial processing of A. vera focuses almost exclusively on the inner parenchyma (AG), discarding the epidermal tissue (AS) as waste. This study addresses the valorization of this byproduct through a comparative evaluation of the phytochemical and biological profiles of hydroalcoholic extracts obtained from both AG and AS. In vitro studies revealed that AS extract exhibited better antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities than AG and good wound-healing properties, driven by its rich content of anthraquinones and polyphenols. Both extracts were successfully incorporated into a mucoadhesive xanthan gum matrix to engineer an advanced emulgel with suitable viscosity for prolonged mucosal adherence in Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) management. Rheological profiling against commercial references confirmed that the xanthan-AS formulation provided comparable rheological properties, fully preserving the extract’s anti-inflammatory activity. Ultimately, this study highlights the pharmaceutical potential of A. vera skin, offering a sustainable strategy to transform an industrial byproduct into an innovative formulation for potential GERD management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1343 KB  
Article
Claudin 18.2 Expression and Outcomes of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in HER2-Negative Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
by Run Bao, Jing Qin, Rong Zhang, Zhuo Xu, Jiahao Liu, Jiaofeng Shen, Shunji Zhang, Yusong Zhang, Hong Zhu, Chunyan Huang, Yan Lu, Tianhua Liu and Wangyang Pu
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(8), 460; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33080460 - 1 Aug 2026
Viewed by 447
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) expression in HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) and to evaluate whether CLDN18.2 status is associated with clinicopathological features and outcomes after first line chemoimmunotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed 189 patients with HER2-negative GC/GEJC treated [...] Read more.
This study aimed to characterize claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) expression in HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) and to evaluate whether CLDN18.2 status is associated with clinicopathological features and outcomes after first line chemoimmunotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed 189 patients with HER2-negative GC/GEJC treated at our institution from October 2019 to September 2024. CLDN18.2 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using two prespecified positivity thresholds: moderate to strong membranous staining (2+) in ≥40% or ≥75% of tumor cells. CLDN18.2 positivity was observed in 92/189 patients (48.7%) using the ≥40% threshold and 69/189 (36.5%) using the ≥75% threshold. PD L1 CPS ≥ 5 was less frequent in CLDN18.2 positive than in CLDN18.2 negative tumors at both thresholds (≥40%: 8.7% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.003; ≥75%: 8.7% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.019). Among 87 patients receiving first line chemoimmunotherapy, CLDN18.2 status was not associated with significant differences in objective response rate, progression free survival, or overall survival. CLDN18.2 positive tumors showed lower PD L1 expression, but CLDN18.2 status did not identify a subgroup with differential benefit from first line chemoimmunotherapy. These findings suggest that CLDN18.2 status does not appear to serve as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastrointestinal Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop