Search Results (261)

In this study, we investigate the return propagation mechanism, hedging effectiveness, and portfolio performance across several common agricultural commodities, crude oil, and S&P 500 index, ranging from July 2000 to June 2024 by using a time-varying parameter vector autoregression (TVP-VAR) connectedness approach and three common multiple assets portfolio optimization strategies. The empirical results show that, the total connectedness peaked during the 2008 global financial crisis, followed by the European debt crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, while it remained relatively lower at the onset of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. In the transmission mechanism, commodities and S&P 500 index exhibit distinct and dynamic characteristics as transmitters or receivers. Portfolio analysis reveals that, with exception of the COVID-19 pandemic, all three dynamic portfolios outperform the S&P 500 benchmark across major global crises. Additionally, the minimum correlation and minimum connectedness strategies are superior than transitional minimum variance method in most scenarios. Our findings have implications for policymakers in preventing systemic risk, for investors in managing portfolio risk, and for farmers and agribusiness enterprises in enhancing economic benefits. Full article

This study proposes a novel Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) policy network structure for portfolio management called PortRSMs. PortRSMs employs stacked State-Space Models (SSMs) for the modeling of multi-scale continuous regime shifts in financial time series, striking a balance between exploring consistent distribution properties over short periods and maintaining sensitivity to sudden shocks in price sequences. PortRSMs also performs cross-asset regime fusion through hypergraph attention mechanisms, providing a more comprehensive state space for describing changes in asset correlations and co-integration. Experiments conducted on two different trading frequencies in the stock markets of the United States and Hong Kong show the superiority of PortRSMs compared to other approaches in terms of profitability, risk–return balancing, robustness, and the ability to handle sudden market shocks. Specifically, PortRSMs achieves up to a 0.03 improvement in the annual Sharpe ratio in the U.S. market, and up to a 0.12 improvement for the Hong Kong market compared to baseline methods. Full article

This follow-up scientific case study builds on prior research to explore the computational challenges of applying quantum algorithms to financial asset management, focusing specifically on solving the graph-cut problem for investment recommendation. Unlike our prior study, which focused on idealized QAOA performance, this work introduces a graph compression pipeline that enables QAOA deployment under real quantum hardware constraints. This study investigates quantum-accelerated spectral graph compression for financial asset recommendations, addressing scalability and regulatory constraints in portfolio management. We propose a hybrid framework combining the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) with spectral graph theory to solve the Max-Cut problem for investor clustering. Our methodology leverages quantum simulators (cuQuantum and Cirq-GPU) to evaluate performance against classical brute-force enumeration, with graph compression techniques enabling deployment on resource-constrained quantum hardware. The results underscore that efficient graph compression is crucial for successful implementation. The framework bridges theoretical quantum advantage with practical financial use cases, though hardware limitations (qubit counts, coherence times) necessitate hybrid quantum-classical implementations. These findings advance the deployment of quantum algorithms in mission-critical financial systems, particularly for high-dimensional investor profiling under regulatory constraints. Full article

This study evaluates the risk-adjusted performance of Hospitality REITs using multi-factor asset pricing models and downside risk measures with the aim of assessing their diversification potential and crisis sensitivity. Unlike prior studies that examine REITs in aggregate, this study isolates Hospitality REITs to explore their unique cyclical and macroeconomic sensitivities. This study looks at the risk-adjusted performance of Hospitality Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) in relation to more general REIT indexes and the S&P 500 Index. The study reveals that monthly returns of Hospitality REITs increasingly move in tandem with the stock markets during financial crises, which reduces their historical function as portfolio diversifiers. Investing in Hospitality REITs exposes one to the hospitality sector; however, these investments carry notable risks and provide little protection, particularly during economic upheavals. Furthermore, the study reveals that Hospitality REITs underperform on a risk-adjusted basis relative to benchmark indexes. The monthly returns of REITs show significant volatility during the post-COVID-19 era, which causes return-to-risk ratios to be below those of benchmark indexes. Estimates from multi-factor models indicate negative alpha values across conditional models, indicating that macroeconomic variables cause unremunerated risks. This industry shows great sensitivity to market beta and size and value determinants. Hospitality REITs’ susceptibility comes from their showing the most possibility for exceptional losses across asset classes under Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CvaR) downside risk assessments. The findings have implications for investors and portfolio managers, suggesting that Hospitality REITs may not offer consistent diversification benefits during downturns but can serve a tactical role in procyclical investment strategies. Full article

In this paper, we aim to provide a new algorithm for managing financial risk in portfolios containing multiple high-volatility assets. We assess the variability of volatility with the Volterra model, and we construct an estimator of the Value-at-Risk (VaR) function using quantile regression. Because of its long-memory property, the Volterra model is particularly useful in this domain of financial time series data analysis. It constitutes a good alternative to the standard approach of Black–Scholes models. From the weighted asymmetric loss function, we construct a new estimator of the VaR function usable in Multi-Functional Volterra Time Series Model (MFVTSM). The constructed estimator highlights the multi-functional nature of the Volterra–Gaussian process. Mathematically, we derive the asymptotic consistency of the estimator through the precision of the leading term of its convergence rate. Through an empirical experiment, we examine the applicability of the proposed algorithm. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of the estimator through an application to real financial data. Full article

Accepting a certain degree of investment loss risk is essential for long-term portfolio management. However, overconfidence bias within financial literacy can prompt excessively risky behavior and amplify susceptibility to other cognitive biases. These tendencies can undermine investment loss tolerance beyond the baseline level shaped by sociodemographic, economic, psychological, and cultural factors. This study empirically examines the association between overconfidence and investment loss tolerance, which is measured by the point at which respondents indicate they would sell their investments in a hypothetical loss scenario. Using a large-scale dataset of 161,765 active investors from one of Japan’s largest online securities firms, we conduct ordered probit and ordered logit regression analyses, controlling for a range of sociodemographic, economic, and psychological variables. Our findings reveal that overconfidence is statistically significantly and negatively associated with investment loss tolerance, indicating that overconfident investors are more prone to prematurely liquidating assets during market downturns. This behavior reflects an impulse to avoid even modest losses. The findings suggest several possible practical strategies to mitigate the detrimental effects of overconfidence on long-term investment behavior. Full article

This study examined the dynamic interconnectedness and portfolio implications within the cryptocurrency ecosystem, focusing on five representative digital assets across the core functional categories: Layer 1 cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH)), decentralized finance (Uniswap (UNI)), stablecoins (Dai), and crypto infrastructure tokens (Maker (MKR)). Using the Extended Joint Connectedness Approach within a Time-Varying Parameter VAR framework, the analysis captured time-varying spillovers of return shocks and revealed a heterogeneous structure of systemic roles. Stablecoins consistently acted as net absorbers of shocks, reinforcing their defensive profile, while governance tokens, such as MKR, emerged as persistent net transmitters of systemic risk. Foundational assets like BTC and ETH predominantly absorbed shocks, contrary to their perceived dominance. These systemic roles were further translated into portfolio design, where connectedness-aware strategies, particularly the Minimum Connectedness Portfolio, demonstrated superior performance relative to traditional variance-based allocations, delivering enhanced risk-adjusted returns and resilience during stress periods. By linking return-based systemic interdependencies with practical asset allocation, the study offers a unified framework for understanding and managing crypto network risk. The findings carry practical relevance for portfolio managers, algorithmic strategy developers, and policymakers concerned with financial stability in digital asset markets. Full article

As investment portfolios become increasingly diversified and financial asset risks grow more complex, accurately forecasting the risk of multiple asset classes through mathematical modeling and identifying their heterogeneity has emerged as a critical topic in financial research. This study examines the volatility and tail risk of gold, crude oil, Bitcoin, and selected stock markets. Methodologically, we propose two improved Value at Risk (VaR) forecasting models that combine the autoregressive (AR) model, Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) model, Extreme Value Theory (EVT), skewed heavy-tailed distributions, and a rolling window estimation approach. The model’s performance is evaluated using the Kupiec test and the Christoffersen test, both of which indicate that traditional VaR models have become inadequate under current complex risk conditions. The proposed models demonstrate superior accuracy in predicting VaR and are applicable to a wide range of financial assets. Empirical results reveal that Bitcoin and the Chinese stock market exhibit no leverage effect, indicating distinct risk profiles. Among the assets analyzed, Bitcoin and crude oil are associated with the highest levels of risk, gold with the lowest, and stock markets occupy an intermediate position. The findings offer practical implications for asset allocation and policy design. Full article

This research investigates the liability management of Thai life insurers in a prolonged low-interest rate environment. It examines the impact of interest rate changes on life insurance products, solvency, and profitability. The study identifies a significant shift in product portfolios toward non-interest-sensitive products, which helps mitigate financial risk and enhance solvency. The solvency of Thai life insurers is influenced by their return on assets, with higher risk exposures requiring more capital, potentially lowering solvency levels. However, the proportion of risky investment assets is not significantly related to the solvency position in the Thai market. The market index return is a significant predictor of stock returns for Thai life insurers, while changes in interest rate sensitivity are not statistically significant between low-rate and normal periods. The average solvency level under Thailand’s regulatory regime is also not statistically different between normal and prolonged low-interest rate situations. This study contributes to the understanding of liability management practices among life insurers in Thailand and provides insights into the challenges and strategies for maintaining solvency and profitability in a low-interest rate environment. Full article

As Chinese firms play pivotal roles in global supply chains, multinational corporations face increasing pressure to ensure ESG accountability across their sourcing networks. Current ESG rating systems lack transparency in incorporating China’s unique industrial, economic, and cultural factors, creating reliability concerns for stakeholders managing supply chain sustainability risks. This study develops an explainable artificial intelligence framework using SHAP and permutation feature importance (PFI) methods to predict the ESG performance of Chinese firms. We analyze comprehensive ESG data of 1608 Chinese listed companies over 13 years (2009–2021), integrating financial and non-financial determinants traditionally examined in isolation. Empirical findings demonstrate that random forest algorithms significantly outperform multivariate linear regression in capturing nonlinear ESG relationships. Key non-financial determinants include patent portfolios, CSR training initiatives, pollutant emissions, and charitable donations, while financial factors such as current assets and gearing ratios prove influential. Sectoral analysis reveals that manufacturing firms are evaluated through pollutant emissions and technical capabilities, whereas non-manufacturing firms are assessed on business taxes and intangible assets. These insights provide essential tools for multinational corporations to anticipate supply chain sustainability conditions. Full article

Over the past decade, multifactor models have shown enhanced capability compared to single-factor models in explaining asset return variability. Given the common assertion that higher risk tends to yield higher returns, this study empirically examines the augmented human capital six-factor model’s performance on thirty-two portfolios of non-financial firms sorted by size, value, profitability, investment, and labor income growth in the Indian market over the period July 2010 to June 2023. Moreover, the current study extends the Fama and French five-factor model by incorporating a human capital proxy by labor income growth as an additional factor thereby proposing an augmented six-factor asset pricing model (HC6FM). The Fama and MacBeth two-step estimation methodology is employed for the empirical analysis. The results reveal that small-cap portfolios yield significantly higher returns than large-cap portfolios. Moreover, all six factors significantly explain the time-series variation in excess portfolio returns. Our findings reveal that the Indian stock market experienced heightened volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a decline in the six-factor model’s efficiency in explaining returns. Furthermore, Gibbons, Ross, and Shanken (GRS) test results reveal mispricing of portfolio returns during COVID-19, with a stronger rejection of portfolio efficiency across models. However, the HC6FM consistently shows lower pricing errors and better performance, specifically during and after the pandemic era. Overall, the results offer important insights for policymakers, investors, and portfolio managers in optimizing portfolio selection, particularly during periods of heightened market uncertainty. Full article

This study comparatively evaluated the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the Fama and French three-factor model (FF3), and the Fama and French five-factor model (FF5) in key US market sectors (finance, energy, and utilities). The goals were to optimize financial decisions and reduce valuation errors. The historical daily returns of ten-stock portfolios, selected from sectors with the highest trading volume in the S&P 500 Index between 2020 and 2024, were analyzed. Companies with the lowest beta were prioritized. Models were compared based on the metrics of the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The results demonstrate the superiority of the multifactor models (FF3 and FF5) over the CAPM in explaining returns in the analyzed sectors. Specifically, the FF3 model was the most accurate in the financial sector; the FF5 model was the most accurate in the energy and utilities sectors; and the FF4 model, with the SMB factor eliminated in the adjustment of the FF5 model, was the least error-prone. The CAPM’s consistent inferiority highlights the need to consider factors beyond market risk. In conclusion, selecting the most appropriate asset valuation model for the US market depends on each sector’s inherent characteristics, favoring multifactor models. Full article

This study investigates the yield-seeking behavior of income-oriented institutional investors, who are essential players in financial markets. While external pressures compelling firms to “reach for yield” are well-documented, the firm-level behavioral drivers underlying this phenomenon remain largely underexplored. Drawing on the behavioral theory of the firm, this study argues that an investor’s performance relative to their social aspiration level (the peer average) influences their yield-seeking decisions, and that this effect is moderated by “portfolio slack,” defined as unrealized gains or losses. To test this theory in the context of persistent low-yield pressure, this study constructs and analyzes a panel dataset of Japanese life insurance companies from 2000 to 2019. The analysis reveals that these investors increase their portfolio income yield after underperforming their peers and decrease it after outperforming. Furthermore, greater portfolio slack amplifies yield increases after underperformance and mitigates yield decreases after outperformance. In contrast, organizational slack primarily mitigates yield reductions after outperformance. This research extends the behavioral theory of the firm to the asset management context by identifying distinct performance feedback responses and proposing portfolio slack as an important analytical construct, thereby offering key insights for investment managers and financial regulators. Full article

This paper introduces a novel multi-objective optimization framework for sustainable portfolio rebalancing under uncertainty. The model simultaneously targets return maximization, downside risk control, and liquidity preservation, addressing the complex trade-offs faced by investors in volatile markets. Unlike traditional static approaches, the framework allows for dynamic asset reallocation and explicitly incorporates nonlinear transaction costs, offering a more realistic representation of trading frictions. Key financial parameters—including expected returns, volatility, and liquidity—are modeled using interval arithmetic, enabling a flexible, distribution-free depiction of uncertainty. Risk is measured through semi-absolute deviation, providing a more intuitive and robust assessment of downside exposure compared to classical variance. A core innovation lies in the behavioral modeling of investor preferences, operationalized through three strategic configurations, pessimistic, optimistic, and mixed, implemented via convex combinations of interval bounds. The framework is empirically validated using a diversified cryptocurrency portfolio consisting of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and Binance Coin, observed over a six-month period. The simulation results confirm the model’s adaptability to shifting market conditions and investor sentiment, consistently generating stable and diversified allocations. Beyond its technical rigor, the proposed framework aligns with sustainability principles by enhancing portfolio resilience, minimizing systemic concentration risks, and supporting long-term decision-making in uncertain financial environments. Its integrated design makes it particularly suitable for modern asset management contexts that require flexibility, robustness, and alignment with responsible investment practices. Full article

The global crude oil market, known for its pronounced volatility and nonlinear dynamics, plays a pivotal role in shaping economic stability and informing investment strategies. Contrary to traditional research focused on price forecasting, this study emphasizes the more investor-centric task of predicting returns for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil. By spotlighting returns, it directly addresses critical investor concerns such as asset allocation and risk management. This study applies advanced machine learning models, including XGBoost, random forest, and neural networks to predict crude oil return, and for the first time, incorporates sustainability and external risk variables, which are shown to enhance predictive performance in capturing the non-stationarity and complexity of financial time-series data. To enhance predictive accuracy, we integrate 55 variables across five dimensions: macroeconomic indicators, financial and futures markets, energy markets, momentum factors, and sustainability and external risk. Among these, the rate of change stands out as the most influential predictor. Notably, XGBoost demonstrates a superior performance, surpassing competing models with an impressive 76% accuracy in direction forecasting. The analysis highlights how the significance of various predictors shifted during the COVID-19 pandemic. This underscores the dynamic and adaptive character of crude oil markets under substantial external disruptions. In addition, by incorporating sustainability factors, the study provides deeper insights into the drivers of market behavior, supporting more informed portfolio adjustments, risk management strategies, and policy development aimed at fostering resilience and advancing sustainable energy transitions. Full article