Search Results (46)

Mangrove ecosystems underpin the livelihoods of coastal and rural households across the tropics, yet how their ecosystem service (ES) values are associated with livelihood-strategy choices remains unevenly understood. Following a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided protocol, this systematic review searched Web of Science and Scopus for studies published between 2016 and 2026 (database search was run on 27 May 2026); of the 353 records identified and 207 screened after removing 146 duplicates, 133 unique studies were retained; 95 of these contributed evidence to one or more of seven outcome themes, while 38 were retained as contextual or background evidence. The seven themes were graded using a hybrid Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE)/Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) approach (zero, high certainty; two, moderate certainty; five, low certainty). A structured assessment of meta-analytic feasibility across six candidate outcome domains found that no domain met the operational requirement of at least three independent studies reporting one outcome construct on a harmonisable metric with usable variance information; therefore, this review reports the direction, consistency, and certainty of associations rather than pooled-effect magnitudes. The corpus shows a pronounced value-epistemology asymmetry, with monetary valuation forming the largest single evidence theme (45 studies, approximately one-third of the corpus) and relational or indigenous framings remaining a smaller but substantive theme (20 studies, about 15%), meaning that household decision-making is incompletely captured. Evidence for mangrove–fishery production linkages and the coastal-protection/ecosystem-based disaster-risk-reduction function was the most consistent and was rated as moderate certainty. However, the fishery evidence provides the more direct connection to livelihood dependence, whereas most coastal-protection estimates are biophysical or aggregate and do not directly demonstrate household livelihood-strategy responses. The five remaining themes rest on low-certainty evidence, with welfare estimates spanning orders of magnitude and value-to-behaviour pathways weakly tested. Asian settings account for roughly half of the evidence (Southeast and South Asia together 45%, 60/133), while African, Latin American, and Pacific Island settings remain under-represented, limiting transferability. Evidence on bundled payments for ecosystem services, blue-carbon governance, and secure community tenure should therefore be treated as context-dependent options for prospective evaluation rather than as established prescriptions. The clearest research priority is quasi-experimental and longitudinal work linking elicited values to observed livelihood behaviour. Full article

Decolonising assessment remains an underdeveloped yet essential component of higher education transformation. In research, much attention has been assigned to decolonising content knowledge and pedagogy, with limited attention to assessment. Hence, this systematic literature review examines empirical studies published between 2018 and 2025 to explore how decolonial assessment is enacted in higher education. Using the PRISMA 2020 framework, 17 studies were analysed to identify theoretical foundations, methodological trends, dominant themes, key findings, and literature gaps to make recommendations for future research. The findings reveal six interconnected practices characterising decolonial assessment: humanising learning, contextualising assessment within students’ cultural and community realities, disrupting power hierarchies through co-creation, collaborative and peer-based approaches, diversifying modes of expression, and enhancing transparency and cultural responsiveness. These practices validate students’ lived experiences, foreground multiple epistemologies, and challenge traditional assessment norms, thereby promoting deeper engagement, agency, and belonging. However, the scholarship is constrained by a reliance on small-scale qualitative designs, limited theoretical development, and regional concentration, particularly in South Africa and the United States. The review concludes that while decolonial assessment offers transformative potential, its broader institutional uptake requires methodological pluralism, stronger theoretical frameworks, and policy-level support. The paper recommends embedding decolonial principles in assessment design, expanding research across diverse contexts, and strengthening lecturer capacity to develop equitable, inclusive, and contextually grounded assessment practices that advance epistemic justice in higher education. Full article

This article proposes a formal epistemological and methodological framework for the analysis of lithic technology, moving beyond traditional optimization-oriented models and normative typologies. Grounded in Mario Bunge’s socio-natural science and Herbert Simon’s theory of bounded rationality, we introduce the concept of legaliform (law-like) principles. These principles are defined as stable, necessary relationships between technical procedures and morphological outcomes, dictated by the physics of brittle fracture and enacted through procedural memory. To enhance analytical precision and cross-cultural comparability, we develop a semi-formal symbolic notation that identifies the core “techno-scientific” operators underlying lithic reduction. We argue that stone tool morphology is not a static reflection of a “mental template,” but a dynamic sequence of technically adequate states achieved through satisficing behavior. By framing these legaliform regularities as epistemological meta-standards, this article establishes a standardized framework for data reproducibility, verification, and quality control in technological analysis. The framework identifies eight primary legaliform principles—including bifacial reduction (PBR), thermal alteration (PTT), and maintenance and reactivation (PMR)—illustrating how they structure technical action under material and cognitive constraints. The utility of this approach is demonstrated through a case study of Paleoindian Fell projectile points in South America. By operationalizing the Maintenance and Reactivation Principle (PMR), we explain the high morphological variability of these points as a predictable result of life-history and functional restoration rather than cultural “drift” or failed design. This perspective provides a rigorous basis for identifying Guided Convergence in the archaeological record, offering a scientific alternative to diffusionist explanations and purely morphological comparisons that often overlook the underlying techno-scientific regularities of lithic practice. Full article

Colombia condenses a paradox common across Latin America’s extractive economies: one of the region’s cleanest electricity matrices—close to 60% of installed capacity is hydropower—coexists with large-scale coal and oil exports, while renewable potential concentrates in ethnic and peasant territories that remain energy-poor. Although the country has enacted an ambitious just-transition framework, conflicts persist. This study asks which epistemological and ontological factors constrain or enable that transition. Using an interpretive-critical qualitative design, it triangulates four evidentiary pillars: critical discourse analysis of policy instruments, a structured critical review of the academic and policy literature, six megaproject case studies, and ten participatory workshops with 259 territorial actors across nine departments. Six recurrent, cross-case findings emerge: epistemological asymmetry, ontological irreducibility of territory, participation reduced to procedure, fragmented governance, the Caribbean territorial paradox (La Guajira combines the country’s highest renewable potential with its lowest electricity coverage), and unresolved fiscal dependence on hydrocarbons. The study’s novelty is Territorial Energy Sustainability (SET), a six-condition framework that articulates sustainability-transitions theory with Latin American critical thought and operationalizes it into five levels of policy intervention, offering a transferable framework for energy-exporting countries of the Global South pursuing transitions that transform rather than reproduce inequality. Full article

This study empirically investigates the interplay between two foundational knowledge frameworks in architectural design education: the Vitruvian triad (Architectural Knowledge Traditions—AkT) and the Triple Bottom Line (Sustainability Knowledge Traditions—SkT). Focusing on Ethiopia as a case of non-industrial urbanization in the Global South, where socio-economic realities diverge from Global North contexts, the research examines how the six variables within these frameworks interact within pedagogical practice. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines questionnaires from senior architectural design instructors across 13 universities with a critical content analysis of university exit model-examinations. Analyzed through specific theoretical lenses, findings reveal a critical divergence: while instructors demonstrate strong theoretical awareness of complementarity between the two traditions, their model-assessment focuses contradict this stance. The analysis reveals a fundamental skew toward an inherited environmental doctrine, where the Venustas–Environment coupling dominates at the expense of social and economic survival imperatives. The study concludes that these “knowledge overlaps” do not inherently warrant successful integration but instead reflect a “design–reality gap” fueled by globalized doctrines and knowledge coloniality. The study concludes by providing the empirical grounding necessary to dismantle the often-universalized norms, arguing for a localized matrix that centers epistemological autonomy within architectural education in the Global South. Full article

Social Innovation (SI) has emerged as a strategic paradigm for addressing systemic challenges in highly uncertain environments. However, its practice still reveals epistemological fragmentation that risks reducing SI to welfare-oriented approaches. This article presents a critical and constructive analysis aimed at mitigating the “methodological myopia” that persists in social impact assessment. Through a systematic literature review and a qualitative case study in the Antofagasta Region (Chile), the article argues that the scientific validity of SI depends on longitudinal, multidimensional, and territorially grounded evaluative frameworks. The study examines the relationship between SI and Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a source of methodological rigor, improving traceability and auditability while supporting the scaling of interventions. In response to techno-utopian forms of determinism, the article proposes an ethical and participatory governance framework based on the Multi-Helix model, integrating academia, the public sector, private enterprise, and civil society in the co-creation of public value. The findings suggest that the institutionalization of SI through AI must move beyond procedural efficiency to foster structural transformation. In Antofagasta, this AI-supported certification architecture is already operational within the Regional Innovation Strategy (ERI) 2022–2028 through the executed FIC-R 2023 project on Social Innovation Certification. The Antofagasta experience is therefore presented as an illustrative case of territorial governance, offering transferable principles for other Global South contexts rather than a directly replicable model. Full article

Spaces labeled as ‘extreme’ have long fueled the imagination of those who sought to explore, conquer, and represent them. Framed in colonial narratives as terra incognita or finis terrae, these regions generated diverse forms of textual and visual knowledge while simultaneously arousing curiosity and fear. The polar regions, Amazonian forests, and the seas and mountains of Patagonia played a central role in shaping the epistemologies of modern science and art in South America, functioning as laboratories in which ways of seeing were tested and transformed through processes of encounter. In this paper, we move beyond approaches that treat extreme spaces as fixed geographical entities defined solely by climatic severity or environmental hostility. Drawing on a pedagogical experiment inspired by Warburgian image-based research practices, we argue that extreme spaces are better understood as relational constructs, co-produced through multispecies and intercultural encounters. Through a comparative analysis of European iconographies across South America, we identify two coexisting clusters of meaning: one organised around abundance, intercultural cooperation, and extractivism; the other around scarcity, resistance, and environmental imposition. By tracing the circulation and mobilization of these meanings across different environments, we propose an epistemology of extremes, suggesting a mode of knowledge production that classifies spaces through the lens of radical otherness. Full article

Co-authored by a French humanitarian anthropologist and a South Sudanese refugee and environmental activist, both writers situated across the Global North and South, this article argues that artistic practices in displacement operate as infrastructures of survival, whose conditions of existence are both enabled and constrained by external actors. Drawing on a case study of Tongogara Refugee Settlement, it argues that the arts—and, more broadly, knowledge production—constitute key survival mechanisms across psychological, psychosocial, and identity-related dimensions. This article further shows that artistic practices in displacement are not only autonomous expressions of resilience but also mediated cultural forms whose visibility and meaning are co-produced through humanitarian, institutional, and epistemic regimes—including the regimes of academic writing itself. First, we examine art’s three interrelated survival dimensions: psychological (personal coherence amid uncertainty and symbolic mobility), psychosocial (collective bonding and mutual support), and identity (cultural representation, memory, heritage, and self-definition in displacement). Second, we examine how these functions are shaped by interactions with external actors—including humanitarian organizations, donors, cultural platforms, and academic institutions—that may increase visibility while favoring curated representation over sustained artistic development, reflecting broader donor-driven logics of accountability. Third, drawing on reflexive notes from the co-authorship process, we show how academic narration can reproduce these asymmetries, thereby positioning co-creation as both an ethical practice and an epistemic condition of equitable knowledge production. Drawing on humanitarian anthropology, aesthetics, and decolonial epistemologies, we argue that processes of symbolic and cultural reconstruction remain structurally under-institutionalized, circulating across humanitarian, developmental, and epistemic regimes without being fully claimed by any of them. Rather than offering normative prescriptions, the article traces how co-production itself becomes a site where these asymmetries are reproduced and made visible. Full article

African migrants arriving in South Africa are finding themselves fighting a war on two fronts: the one they fled from and the one they are arriving to. As a collection of five individual narratives, this research goes behind the paintings, performances, and poetry to understand how not only migration and xenophobia, but also lives are embodied and negotiated through creative mediums, and how these creative mediums should also be emphasised as important epistemologies. Here, a journey will be taken through understanding xenophobia and otherness through the lens of language, and will look at how the arts, as a form of language, offer an alternative space and way of communicating in a space that discriminates based on communication (or lack thereof). Accordingly, the research further investigates (self-)representation from the individual and community, how public displays of pain are really felt by the artists sharing their vulnerability, and also how creative practices create a space to negotiate between the complexities of ‘home’ and the violent state of xenophobia arrived to in and beyond South Africa. Consequently, the study explores how trauma and experiences are not always visible on the body, but are carried through the mind, spirit, and generations that come later. Full article

As a form of living heritage, Historic Urban Landscapes (HULs) have long been limited by the static perspectives and reductionist tendencies of conventional conservation and research approaches. Although the geological and archaeological concept of “stratification” offers a methodological basis for understanding the diachronic evolution of heritage, its unidimensional temporal lens fails to capture the inherent complexity and systemic nature of historic urban landscapes. To address this gap, this study proposes a “multidimensional stratification” theoretical framework through theoretical critique and paradigm reconstruction. The framework introduces innovations at the ontological, epistemological, and methodological levels, positing that the evolution of historic urban landscapes emerges from the nonlinear interaction and dynamic interweaving of four core dimensions: time, space, society, and value. It further systematizes five intrinsic attributes of such landscapes: authenticity, integrity, continuity, adaptability, and dynamism. Building on this foundation, the paper constructs a systematic analytical pathway—elements–processes–patterns–modes–drivers–characteristics—that enables dynamic analysis from micro-level identification to macro-level generalization, offering a scalable tool for HUL conservation and regeneration. To demonstrate the framework’s applicability, the historic urban area of Shenyang—a nationally designated historical and cultural city—is selected as a case study. Its urban landscape comprises four core districts: the Shengjing City District, the South Manchuria Railway Concession District, the Commercial Port District, and the Tiexi Industrial District, representing historical strata from the Qing dynasty capital, modern colonial planning, commercial opening, to industrial heritage. Using the multidimensional stratification approach, this study elucidates the spatial complexity, temporal nonlinearity, social dynamism, and value pluralism embedded in Shenyang’s historic urban area. Corresponding conservation strategies grounded in holism, dynamism, and differentiation are proposed. The research not only advances the theoretical understanding of HUL but also provides a novel paradigm—integrating holistic, dynamic, and operational perspectives—for the conservation, renewal, and regenerative practice of historic urban landscapes worldwide. Full article

Name.Narrate.Navigate (NNN) is a trauma-informed program for justice-involved young people aged 12–18 years, recognising that experience and use of violence are often interconnected and may involve serious criminal behaviour, including vulnerability to criminal exploitation. NNN addresses a gap in evidence-based, culturally responsive tertiary interventions for this cohort in regional New South Wales (NSW), Australia, integrating dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) principles with Aboriginal ways of knowing and doing, co-designed through community-based participatory research (CBPR) with Aboriginal community members, young people, and frontline practitioners. The program aims to strengthen skills for self-awareness, self-regulation and healthy connection through relational, creative, and participatory approaches. Using a realist evaluation framework, this paper examines what works in NNN, for whom, and under what circumstances. Drawing on participant session ratings, practitioner observations, program documentation, and interviews, findings are organised across four domains: effects, mechanisms, moderators, and implementation. Indicative findings show that engagement, emerging changes in the narratives of self, and developing skills for self-regulation were most evident when trauma-informed and culturally safe practice was enacted within genuinely relational, strengths-based encounters. These conditions are identified and discussed as transferable principles for the field, key amongst them that intervention readiness must be treated as a capacity to be actively built rather than a precondition to be screened for; and that creative, participant-led methods represent an epistemological commitment to whose knowledge counts in practice. This case study contributes to a critically underserved evidence base by documenting not only what a tertiary youth violence intervention looks like, but the conditions under which it begins to work and for whom. Full article

Modern healthcare remains structurally and conceptually fragmented, with profound clinical and policy implications. At its root lies an ontological fracture: the prevailing biomedical model reduces patients to discrete biological systems (organs, biomarkers, and symptoms) detached from the psychological, social, and ecological contexts in which health and illness are experienced. This is compounded by epistemological fragmentation, where medical knowledge is compartmentalized into increasingly narrow specialties, limiting holistic understanding. These philosophical divisions manifest in downstream operational, informational, financial, and policy dysfunctions duplicative testing, misaligned incentives, disconnected care pathways, and population health failures. To address these multilevel fractures, we propose a unified architecture grounded in three interlocking components. First, the Precision and Personalized Population Health (P3H) framework offers a principle-based realignment toward care that is integrated, personalized, proactive, and population wide. P3H addresses the conceptual shortcomings of fragmented care by focusing on the full human trajectory across time, systems, and determinants. Second, General Purpose Technologies including artificial intelligence, biosensors, mobile diagnostics, and multimodal data systems enable the operationalization of whole-person care at scale, especially in low-resource settings. Third, the AI-WHOLE policy framework (Alignment, Integration, Workflow, Holism, Outcomes, Learning, and Equity) provides governance principles to guide ethical, equitable, and context-specific implementation. We argue that this triadic blueprint is particularly critical for Global South nations, where the lack of legacy infrastructure offers an opportunity for leapfrogging toward integrated, intelligent systems of care. Early models illustrate how policy-aligned, technology-enabled care rooted in whole-person principles can yield improvements in continuity, cost-efficiency, and chronic disease outcomes. This manuscript offers a systems-level strategy to overcome fragmentation and reimagine healthcare delivery, not only by refining clinical tools, but by redefining what it means to care for the human being in full. Full article

80 years of Chilean rock art research, from its early descriptive stages in the 1940s to the present-day integration of relational ontologies, archaeometric techniques, and interdisciplinary perspectives, is reviewed. 562 publications are analysed, covering four major regions: the Arid North, Semi-Arid North, South-Central, and Southernmost Chile. Drawing from a systematically constructed corpus, we trace the evolution of research questions, theoretical orientations, and methodologies over time, with attention to regional trends and institutional dynamics. Results reveal a gradual shift from typological classification toward more complex approaches addressing mobility, landscape, coloniality, visual agency, and human/non-human relationships. The Arid North emerges as the primary centre of innovation, while southern regions remain in exploratory stages despite recent advances. Comparison with global research trajectories shows how Chile’s situated approaches—marked by decentralisation, theoretical pluralism, and critical reflection—contribute to decolonial and southern perspectives in rock art studies. Rather than reproducing hegemonic models, Chilean scholarship offers alternative epistemologies rooted in context-specific materiality and historical processes. The review highlights the potential of Chilean rock art research to expand the theoretical and methodological horizons of the discipline, positioning it as a fertile field for dialogue with contemporary archaeology and global visual studies. Full article

This autoethnographic study examines my transformation as an educator teaching gender and sexuality to future helping professionals in South African higher education. Through systematic analysis of personal journals, teaching reflections, and pedagogical materials collected over 180 contact hours, I explore how innovative approaches can create collaborative learning environments in traditionally sensitive subject areas. Drawing on critical pedagogy, queer theory, and decolonizing methodologies, the research reveals three interconnected pedagogical innovations: structured vulnerability protocols that transcend traditional “safe space” models, progressive exposure pedagogy that challenges heteronormative assumptions by introducing diverse content early, and indigenous knowledge integration that positions students as knowledge co-creators. The findings demonstrate how my professional evolution from knowledge authority to learning facilitator enabled authentic engagement with diverse epistemologies while maintaining academic rigor. Students consistently contributed concepts absent from academic literature—from social media discourse about sexual identity hierarchies to traditional cultural practices—enriching collective understanding. This study addresses significant gaps in South African literature on tertiary-level sexuality education pedagogy, offering concrete strategies for implementing transformative approaches. The research contributes to autoethnographic scholarship by demonstrating how systematic reflection can generate theoretical insights about collaborative knowledge construction while acknowledging the ongoing challenges of teaching sensitive subjects within complex cultural contexts. Full article

The call to decolonize South African university curricula continues to shape academic discourse, highlighting the urgency of integrating African Indigenous Knowledge Systems (AIKSs) into theological education. While Western epistemologies have long dominated theology in Africa, this article argues for a paradigm shift by positioning public theology as a viable framework for engaging AIKS in meaningful and transformative ways. The article examines how AIKSs—expressed through oral traditions, communal spiritualities, and indigenous ethics—can enrich theological discourse, enhance contextual relevance, and address issues such as social justice, identity, and community cohesion. Drawing on the decoloniality discourse, this study critically explores the epistemological, institutional, and pedagogical challenges hindering integration and proposes concrete strategies including curriculum reform, faculty training, and community-based theological formation. The article contributes to the decolonization of theological education by offering a context-specific framework that repositions AIKSs as legitimate theological resources. In doing so, it advances a model of public theology that is inclusive, rooted in African realities, and responsive to the transformative needs of Southern African societies. Full article