Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (246)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = endovascular stent

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 569 KiB  
Systematic Review
Intravascular Lithotripsy in the Aorta and Iliac Vessels: A Literature Review of the Past Decade
by Nicola Troisi, Giulia Bertagna, Sofia Pierozzi, Valerio Artini and Raffaella Berchiolli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5493; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155493 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 145
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Nowadays, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for treatment of vascular calcifications, first in coronary and then in peripheral arteries. In the current literature there is little evidence that describes IVL as an effective and safe solution in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Nowadays, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for treatment of vascular calcifications, first in coronary and then in peripheral arteries. In the current literature there is little evidence that describes IVL as an effective and safe solution in treating severe aortic and aorto-iliac calcifications. The aim of this study is to report current available data about the use of IVL in treating aortic and aorto-iliac calcified lesions and its application in facilitating other endovascular procedures. Methods: the present review was conducted and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Preliminary searches were conducted on MEDLINE and Pubmed from January 2015 to February 2025. Studies were divided into 3 main categories depending on the location of calcifications and the type of treatment: IVL in visceral and infrarenal obstructive disease (group 1), IVL in aorto-iliac obstructive disease (group 2), IVL used to facilitate other endovascular procedures. Main primary outcomes in the perioperative period were technical and clinical successes and perioperative complications. Primary outcomes at 30 days and mid-term (2 years) were overall survival, limb salvage rate, primary patency, primary assisted patency, secondary patency, and residual stenosis. Results: Sixteen studies were identified for a total of 1674 patients. Technical and clinical successes were 100%, with low rates of perioperative complications. Dissection rate reaches up to 16.1% in some studies, without any differences compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) alone (22.8%; p = 0.47). At 30 days, limb salvage and survival rates were 100%. At 2 years, primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency were 95%, 98%, and 100%, respectively, with no difference compared to IVL + stenting. Conclusions: IVL has emerged as a novel approach to treat severe calcified lesions in visceral and aorto-iliac atherosclerotic disease and to facilitate other endovascular procedures. This technique seems to offer satisfactory early and mid-term outcomes in terms of primary, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency with low complication rates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endovascular Surgery: State of the Art and Clinical Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3504 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Aortic Arch Stent-Graft Performance Through Material Science: An Exploratory Study
by Xiaobing Liu, Linxuan Zhang, Zongchao Liu and Shuai Teng
Materials 2025, 18(15), 3592; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18153592 - 31 Jul 2025
Viewed by 246
Abstract
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for cardiovascular diseases often encounters complications that are closely linked to the mechanical properties of stent-grafts. Both the design and material properties influence device performance, but the specific impacts of material properties remain underexplored and poorly understood. This [...] Read more.
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for cardiovascular diseases often encounters complications that are closely linked to the mechanical properties of stent-grafts. Both the design and material properties influence device performance, but the specific impacts of material properties remain underexplored and poorly understood. This study aims to fill this gap by systematically investigating how material science can modulate stent-graft mechanics. Four types of bare nitinol stents combined with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) or polyethylene terephthalate (PET) grafts were modeled via finite element analysis, creating eight stent-graft configurations. Key mechanical properties—flexibility, crimpability, and fatigue performance—were evaluated to dissect material effects. The results revealed that nitinol’s properties significantly influenced all performance metrics, while PET grafts notably enhanced flexibility and fatigue life. No significant differences in equivalent stress were found between PET and e-PTFE grafts, and both had minimal impacts on radial force. This work underscores the potential of material science-driven optimization to enhance stent-graft performance for improved clinical outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Porous Lightweight Materials and Lattice Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1591 KiB  
Systematic Review
Management of Aberrant Internal Carotid Artery Injury Caused During Otologic Procedures: Systematic Review and Multicenter Case Series
by Andreas Spörlein, Susan Arndt, Till F. Jakob, Antje Aschendorff, Theo Demerath, Christian Taschner, Andrzej Balcerowiak, Patrycja Rusin, Ann-Kathrin Rauch and Wojciech Gawęcki
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5285; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155285 - 26 Jul 2025
Viewed by 363
Abstract
Background/Objectives: An aberrant internal carotid artery (aICA) in the middle ear is a rare vascular anomaly with potentially catastrophic consequences if injured during otologic procedures. Given its rarity, standardized treatment recommendations are lacking. This study aims to present four cases of aICA bleeding, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: An aberrant internal carotid artery (aICA) in the middle ear is a rare vascular anomaly with potentially catastrophic consequences if injured during otologic procedures. Given its rarity, standardized treatment recommendations are lacking. This study aims to present four cases of aICA bleeding, systematically review the literature, and evaluate the outcomes of conservative and interventional management. Methods: A retrospective review of four patients treated for intraoperative aICA hemorrhage at two tertiary referral centers was performed. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Neurologic and otologic outcomes, hemostasis, and complications were analyzed. Results: Two patients were treated conservatively with external auditory canal packing, while two required endovascular coil embolization due to pseudoaneurysm formation or persistent bleeding. One patient suffered a stroke due to traumatic ICA occlusion. The systematic review identified 20 additional cases. Conservative treatment alone sufficed in 37.5% of cases, whereas 62.5% required vessel occlusion via coiling, balloon occlusion, or stenting. Neurologic complications occurred in 25% of patients, while otologic outcomes varied widely and were inconsistently reported. Conclusions: Initial external auditory canal packing and a CT angiogram should be recommended for all patients. Initial conservative management may be appropriate for cases with early hemostasis if close monitoring is ensured. Endovascular treatment is often necessary, particularly in cases of pseudoaneurysm or rebleeding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1360 KiB  
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the BeGraft Peripheral and BeGraft Peripheral PLUS Outcomes as Bridging Covered Stents in Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair
by George Apostolidis, Petroula Nana, José I. Torrealba, Giuseppe Panuccio, Athanasios Katsargyris and Tilo Kölbel
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5221; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155221 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 215
Abstract
Background/Objective: Bridging stent optimal choice in fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (f/bEVAR) is under investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis studied the outcomes of the BeGraft peripheral and peripheral PLUS as bridging stents in f/bEVAR. Methods: The methodology was pre-registered [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: Bridging stent optimal choice in fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (f/bEVAR) is under investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis studied the outcomes of the BeGraft peripheral and peripheral PLUS as bridging stents in f/bEVAR. Methods: The methodology was pre-registered to the PROSPERO (CRD420251007695). Following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO model, the PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched for observational studies and randomized control trials, in English, from 2015 to 2025, reporting on f/bEVAR patients using the second-generation BeGraft peripheral or the BeGraft peripheral PLUS balloon expandable covered stent (BECS; Bentley InnoMed, Hechingen, Germany) for bridging. The ROBINS-I assessed the risk of bias and GRADE the quality of evidence. Target vessel technical success, occlusion/stenosis, endoleak Ic/IIIc, reintervention and instability during follow-up were primary outcomes, assessed using proportional meta-analysis. Results: Among 1266 studies, eight were included (1986 target vessels; 1791 bridged via BeGraft); all retrospective, except one. The ROBINS-I showed that seven were at serious risk of bias. According to GRADE, the quality of evidence was “very low” for primary outcomes. Target vessel technical success was 99% (95% CI 98–100%; I2 = 12%). The mean follow-up was 20.2 months. Target-vessel instability was 3% (95% CI 2–5%; I2 = 44%), occlusion/stenosis was 1% (95% CI 1–4%; I2 = 8%) and endoleak Ic/IIIc was 1% (95% CI 0–3%; I2 = 0%). The estimated target-vessel reintervention was 2% (95% CI 2–4%; I2 = 12%). Celiac trunk, superior mesenteric and renal artery instability were 1% (95% CI 0–16%; I2 = 0%;), 1% (95% CI 0–5%; I2 = 14%) and 4% (95% CI 2–7%; I2 = 40%), respectively. Conclusions: The BeGraft peripheral and peripheral PLUS BECS performed with high technical success and low instability when used for bridging in f/bEVAR. Cautious interpretation is required due to the very low quality of evidence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1214 KiB  
Article
Quadruple Fenestrated Stentgrafts for Complex Aortic Aneurysms: Outcomes of Non-Stented Celiac Artery Fenestrations
by Daniela Toro, Kim Bredahl, Katarina Björses, Tomas Ohrlander, Katja Vogt and Timothy Resch
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5189; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155189 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 270
Abstract
Background: Fenestrated stentgrafting has become a first-line treatment for juxtarenal aneurysms, and the incorporation of all renovisceral vessels with fenestrations has become common to increase the proximal sealing zone. This increases the complexity of the repair compared to using fewer fenestrations, and [...] Read more.
Background: Fenestrated stentgrafting has become a first-line treatment for juxtarenal aneurysms, and the incorporation of all renovisceral vessels with fenestrations has become common to increase the proximal sealing zone. This increases the complexity of the repair compared to using fewer fenestrations, and stenting of the celiac artery (CA), in particular, can be technically challenging. Objective: This study evaluates the mid-term outcomes of leaving the celiac artery unstented during quadruple fenestrated stentgrafting for complex aortic aneurysms. Additionally, it explores the clinical and anatomical factors that influence the decision to not stent the celiac artery. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients with complex aortic aneurysms who underwent elective fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) between 2018 and 2023. Custom Cook Zenith grafts were used, and all patients underwent preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) as well as follow-up CTA to assess the celiac artery. This study evaluated celiac artery anatomic factors, such as proximal and distal diameter; presence of stenosis (<50% or >50%) and patency; length of any CA stenosis; CA takeoff angulation, CA tortuosity, early CA division; calcification; and presence of CA aneurysm or ectasia anatomical abnormalities. Recorded outcomes of CA instability included any stent stenosis, target vessel occlusion, reintervention, or endoleak (types 1C and 3). Results: A total of 101 patients underwent FEVAR, with 72 receiving a stent in the celiac artery and 29 not receiving it. Rates of technical success (96.5% vs. 100%), intervention times (256 min vs. 237 min), and lengths of hospital stay (5.1 vs. 4.7 days) were similar between unstented vs. stented groups. At one year, no significant difference in celiac artery instability was noted (17.2 vs. 5.5%; p = 0.06). Risk factors for CA occlusion on univariate analysis included a steep takeoff angle (≥140°), length of stenosis >6.5 mm, proximal diameter ≤6.5 mm, preoperative stenosis ≥50%, and celiac artery tortuosity. Conclusions: Anatomical features of the CA impact the ability to achieve routine CA stenting during FEVAR. Selectively not stenting the celiac artery during FEVAR might simplify the procedure without compromising patient safety and mid-term outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aortic Aneurysms: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 482 KiB  
Case Report
Endovascular Treatment of a Symptomatic Vertebral Artery Aneurysm in a Puerperal Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 1—A Case Report and Review of the Literature
by Nikola Mirkovic, Marko Prokic, Nikola Prodanovic, Tamara Nikolic Turnic, Nikola Andric, Tijana Prodanovic, Neda Arsenijevic, Ivan Simic, Dragan Knezevic and Aleksandar Matic
Diseases 2025, 13(7), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13070226 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 222
Abstract
Introduction: Primary extracranial vertebral artery aneurysms are sporadic in the general population. They are uncommon in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1. During pregnancy or in the puerperium, the risk of aneurysm rupture in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 and extracranial aneurysms is elevated. [...] Read more.
Introduction: Primary extracranial vertebral artery aneurysms are sporadic in the general population. They are uncommon in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1. During pregnancy or in the puerperium, the risk of aneurysm rupture in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 and extracranial aneurysms is elevated. Rupture of a vertebral artery aneurysm is an emergency condition and can be fatal. Case presentation: We present the case of a 33-year-old woman in the puerperium with neurofibromatosis type 1 who had a vertebral symptomatic artery aneurysm. During a previous hospitalization, two months before the treatment of the vertebral aneurysm, a same-sided aneurysm of the thyrocervical trunk was successfully treated with endovascular coiling because of aneurysm rupture. In this case report, the vertebral artery aneurysm was successfully managed using a flow diverter stent graft. Conclusions: This is the first reported case of a successfully treated symptomatic vertebral artery aneurysm with a flow diverter stent graft in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 during the early puerperium. Endovascular treatment with a stent graft is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective treatment for patients with vertebral artery aneurysms. Early diagnosis of non-ruptured vertebral artery aneurysms is a crucial as well as appropriate treatment, which should be undertaken in a timely manner to prevent serious complications or a fatal outcome. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1399 KiB  
Article
Single-Stage Endovascular Management of Concurrent Intracranial Aneurysms and Arterial Stenoses: Clinical Outcomes, Procedural Strategies, and Predictive Factors
by Marat Sarshayev, Shayakhmet Makhanbetkhan, Aiman Maidan, Roger Barranco Pons, Dimash Davletov, Abzal Zhumabekov and Mynzhylky Berdikhojayev
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(7), 744; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15070744 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 401
Abstract
Background: The coexistence of extracranial arterial stenoses and intracranial aneurysms presents a unique clinical dilemma. While staged interventions are traditionally preferred to reduce procedural risks, recent advances have enabled single-stage endovascular treatment. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes, procedural strategies, and predictive factors [...] Read more.
Background: The coexistence of extracranial arterial stenoses and intracranial aneurysms presents a unique clinical dilemma. While staged interventions are traditionally preferred to reduce procedural risks, recent advances have enabled single-stage endovascular treatment. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes, procedural strategies, and predictive factors associated with such combined interventions. Methods: This retrospective study included 47 patients treated with single-stage endovascular procedures for concurrent extracranial stenosis and intracranial aneurysm between 2016 and 2024. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were collected. Outcomes were assessed using the mmodified Rankin Scale (mRS), and statistical analyses were performed to identify associations between clinical variables and functional outcomes. Results: Of the 47 patients, 85.1% achieved favorable outcomes (mRS 0–2) at ≥6-month follow-up. The most commonly treated arteries were the internal carotid artery (70.2%) and the middle cerebral artery (34%). Stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion was performed in 93.6% of aneurysm cases, while 91.5% underwent carotid or vertebral stenting. Lesion laterality (left-sided aneurysms, p = 0.019) and stenosis length (p = 0.0469) were significantly associated with outcomes. Smoking was linked to multiple stenoses (p = 0.0191). Two patients experienced major complications: one aneurysmal rebleed after stenting, and one intraoperative rupture. Conclusions: Single-stage endovascular treatment for patients with concurrent extracranial stenosis and intracranial aneurysm is technically feasible and clinically effective in selected cases. Lesion configuration, anatomical considerations, and individualized planning are critical in optimizing outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5786 KiB  
Review
Narrative and Pictorial Review on State-of-the-Art Endovascular Treatment for Focal Non-Infected Lesions of the Abdominal Aorta: Anatomical Challenges, Technical Solutions, and Clinical Outcomes
by Mario D’Oria, Marta Ascione, Paolo Spath, Gabriele Piffaretti, Enrico Gallitto, Wassim Mansour, Antonino Maria Logiacco, Giovanni Badalamenti, Antonio Cappiello, Giulia Moretti, Luca Di Marzo, Gianluca Faggioli, Mauro Gargiulo and Sandro Lepidi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4798; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134798 - 7 Jul 2025
Viewed by 495
Abstract
The natural history of focal non-infected lesions of the abdominal aorta (fl-AA) remains unclear and largely depends on their aetiology. These lesions often involve a focal “tear” or partial disruption of the arterial wall. Penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) and intramural hematomas (IMHs) are [...] Read more.
The natural history of focal non-infected lesions of the abdominal aorta (fl-AA) remains unclear and largely depends on their aetiology. These lesions often involve a focal “tear” or partial disruption of the arterial wall. Penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) and intramural hematomas (IMHs) are examples of focal tears in the aortic wall that can either progress to dilatation (saccular aneurysm) or fail to fully propagate through the medial layers, potentially leading to aortic dissection. These conditions typically exhibit a morphology consistent with eccentric saccular aneurysms. The management of focal non-infected pathologies of the abdominal aorta remains a subject of debate. Unlike fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysms, the inconsistent definitions and limited information regarding the natural history of saccular aneurysms (sa-AAAs) have prevented the establishment of universally accepted practice guidelines for their management. As emphasized in the latest 2024 ESVS guidelines, the focal nature of these diseases makes them ideal candidates for endovascular repair (class of evidence IIa—level C). Moreover, the Society for Vascular Surgery just referred to aneurysm diameter as an indication for treatment suggesting using a smaller diameter compared to fusiform aneurysms. Consequently, the management of saccular aneurysms is likely heterogeneous amongst different centres and different operators. Endovascular repair using tube stent grafts offers benefits like reduced recovery times but carries risks of migration and endoleak due to graft rigidity. These complications can influence long-term success. In this context, the use of endovascular bifurcated grafts may provide a more effective solution for treating these focal aortic pathologies. It is essential to achieve optimal sealing regions through anatomical studies of aortic morphology. Additionally, understanding the anatomical characteristics of focal lesions in challenging necks or para-visceral locations is indeed crucial in device choice. Off-the-shelf devices are favoured for their time and cost efficiency, but new endovascular technologies like fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and custom-made devices enhance treatment success and patient safety. These innovations provide stent grafts in various lengths and diameters, accommodating different aortic anatomies and reducing the risk of type III endoleaks. Although complicated PAUs and focal saccular aneurysms rarely arise in the para-visceral aorta, the consequences of rupture in this segment might be extremely severe. Experience borrowed from complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair demonstrates that fenestrated and branched devices can be deployed safely when anatomical criteria are respected. Elective patients derive the greatest benefit from a fenestrated graft, while urgent cases can be treated confidently with off-the-shelf multibranch systems, reserving other types of repairs for emergent or bail-out cases. While early outcomes of these interventions are promising, it is crucial to acknowledge that limited aortic coverage can still impede effective symptom relief and lead to complications such as aneurysm expansion or rupture. Therefore, further long-term studies are essential to consolidate the technical results and evaluate the durability of various graft options. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Aortic Disease and Revascularization)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 3494 KiB  
Case Report
A Clinical Case of Aneurysmal Dilatation of the Aortic Arch Distal to the Origin of an Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery Treated with Castor Single-Branch Stent Graft Implantation and Right Carotid-Subclavian Bypass
by Antonio Rizza, Silvia Di Sibio, Angela Buonpane, Giancarlo Trimarchi, Marta Casula, Michele Murzi, Pierandrea Farneti, Cataldo Palmieri, Marco Solinas and Sergio Berti
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2025, 12(7), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12070251 - 29 Jun 2025
Viewed by 333
Abstract
Advancements in endovascular stent graft design have enabled the treatment of distal aortic arch pathologies. However, the length of the proximal landing zone remains a limitation, especially with vascular anomalies like an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) posing additional challenges. A 78-year-old patient [...] Read more.
Advancements in endovascular stent graft design have enabled the treatment of distal aortic arch pathologies. However, the length of the proximal landing zone remains a limitation, especially with vascular anomalies like an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) posing additional challenges. A 78-year-old patient underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA), which revealed progressive enlargement of a distal aortic arch aneurysm located beyond an ARSA that coursed between the esophagus and trachea. Following evaluation by the multidisciplinary Aortic Team, a hybrid procedure was planned. A right carotid-to-ARSA bypass was performed and a Castor single-branched stent graft (CSBSG) was deployed in the aortic arch with its side branch directed into the left subclavian artery (LSA), thereby covering the origin of the ARSA. To prevent a type II endoleak, plug embolization of the ARSA origin was subsequently performed. CSBSG is a feasible treatment for distal aortic arch aneurysms, even in the presence of vascular anomalies such as ARSA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiac Development and Regeneration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 607 KiB  
Article
Real-World Data from the First Intracranial Aneurysm Cohort in the Eastern Caribbean from 2021 to 2024: The Population Characteristics, Treatment Outcomes, and Effectiveness of the Newly Established Regional Organization with Air Transfer to the First Tertiary Neurointerventional Center in the Eastern Caribbean
by Thibaud Pesce, Aboubacar Keita, Thomas Agasse-Lafont, Marie Sabia, Francois Barbotin-Larrieu, Dabor Resiere, Stephanie Puget, Moustapha Drame and Christina Iosif
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4565; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134565 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 350
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The establishment of the first tertiary Neurointerventional Center at the University Hospital of Martinique in 2021, with full coverage of the populations of the French Antilles and Guyana, represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the eastern Caribbean. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The establishment of the first tertiary Neurointerventional Center at the University Hospital of Martinique in 2021, with full coverage of the populations of the French Antilles and Guyana, represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in the eastern Caribbean. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of the first cohort of patients treated for intracranial aneurysms from 2021 to 2024. Methods: We analyzed demographic, clinical, and angiographic data from a prospectively maintained database of patients treated from 1 January 2021 to 31 March 2024. The primary endpoint was the clinical outcome (mRS at discharge and at 4–6 months), and the secondary endpoint was the angiographic outcomes. Results: One hundred patients (mean age 56.7 ± 12.2 years old) with a total of 125 aneurysms (60.8% ruptured; 39.2% unruptured) were included from the following regions: 60% from Martinique, 21% from Guadeloupe, 13% from French Guyana, 1% from mainland France, 2% from St Martin, and 3% from abroad. The mean initial GCS value was 11.6 (median: 13; min: 4; max: 15); the mean mRS was 1.8 ± 1.7 before intervention, 1.8 ± 2 at discharge, and 1.7 ± 2 at 4–6 months. A total of 75% of the aneurysms were treated with coiling or remodeling, 23% received stents (20% FDs), and 0.8% were treated surgically. The procedure-related morbidity rate was 5.6% (7/125), and the mortality rate was 10.4%; both these percentages concerned only the ruptured cases. In the ruptured aneurysm subgroup, 32.8% (25/76) of complications were SAH-related, 9.2% (7/76) were hydrocephalus incidences, and 23.6% (18/76) were vasospasm cases. Satisfactory occlusion was obtained for 95.2% of the aneurysms post-procedure and for 96.7% at the last angiographic control. At the six-month control, 68% of the patients were independent in their everyday lives (mRS ≤ 2). Conclusions: The population was distinct in terms of the hyperexpression of risk factors, the multiplicity of IAs, and the severity of SAH. Female predominance was higher than usual in the population (81%). The organizational schema seemed effective; the treatments were safe and effective in terms of the clinical and angiographic outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 873 KiB  
Review
Beyond Endoleaks: A Holistic Management Approach to Late Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Ruptures After Endovascular Repair
by Rafic Ramses and Obiekezie Agu
J. Vasc. Dis. 2025, 4(3), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/jvd4030024 - 22 Jun 2025
Viewed by 353
Abstract
Late ruptures of abdominal aortic aneurysms post-endovascular aneurysm repair present a significant risk, occurring in about 0.9% of cases. The typical timeframe leading to rupture is roughly 37 months, with the primary factors often linked to endoleaks, especially types I and III, which [...] Read more.
Late ruptures of abdominal aortic aneurysms post-endovascular aneurysm repair present a significant risk, occurring in about 0.9% of cases. The typical timeframe leading to rupture is roughly 37 months, with the primary factors often linked to endoleaks, especially types I and III, which sustain pressure within the aneurysm sac. The approaches to managing late ruptures consist of endovascular approaches, open surgical interventions, and conservative care, each customised to the patient’s specific characteristics. When feasible endovascular repair is favoured, additional stent grafts are deployed to seal endoleaks and offer lower perioperative mortality rates compared to those for open surgery. Open repair is considered when endovascular solutions fail or are not feasible. Conservative management with active monitoring and supportive treatment can be considered for haemodynamically stable non-surgical patients. Endovascular repair methods like fenestrated/branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) and parallel grafting (PGEVAR) are effective for complicated anatomies and show high technical success with reduced morbidity compared to that with open repairs. Chimney techniques and physician-modified endografts may help regain and broaden the sealing zone. Limb extensions with or without embolisation, interposition endografting, and whole-body relining are helpful options for type IB and type 3–5 endoleaks. Open surgical repair carries a higher perioperative mortality but may be essential in preventing death due to rupture following failed EVAR. The choice depends on the patient’s clinical stability and fitness for surgery in the absence of a viable endovascular alternative. This article discusses the available options for treating late rupture after EVAR, emphasising the importance of individualised treatment plans and the need for rigorous postoperative surveillance to prevent such complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Peripheral Vascular Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3403 KiB  
Systematic Review
Comparing Stenting with Medical Therapy Versus Medical Therapy Alone in Patients with Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Current Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Khalid Bin Aziz, Hussam Alhathlol, Fahad Bin Aziz, Mohammed Alshammari, Mohammed Ali Alhefdhi, Abdulrahman M. Alrasheed, Nawwaf Alfayez and Thamer S. Alhowaish
Clin. Pract. 2025, 15(6), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15060113 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 605
Abstract
Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a significant cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, with high recurrence rates despite optimal medical therapy. While endovascular stenting has been proposed as an adjunctive treatment, its clinical benefit remains controversial as a first line therapy. Objective: To [...] Read more.
Background: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a significant cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, with high recurrence rates despite optimal medical therapy. While endovascular stenting has been proposed as an adjunctive treatment, its clinical benefit remains controversial as a first line therapy. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of stenting plus medical therapy (STN+MT) compared to medical therapy alone (MT) in patients with symptomatic ICAS through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and EBSCO for RCTs comparing STN+MT with MT in adult patients with symptomatic ICAS. Primary outcomes included transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and death at 30 days and 1 year. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models as appropriate. Meta-regression was conducted to assess effect modification by study-level characteristics. Results: Four trials comprising 990 patients were included. STN+MT was associated with significantly higher 30-day risk of stroke and ICH compared to MT alone. No significant differences in TIA, stroke, ICH, or death were found at 1 year. Meta-regression revealed no significant effect modifiers, suggesting consistent findings across subgroups. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis consolidates the evidence that intracranial stenting as a first line therapy offers no significant advantage over medical therapy in preventing stroke in symptomatic ICAS, while it does pose added early risks. This holds true across different trials, patient demographics, and clinical scenarios examined. The consistency of this message across multiple RCTs provides a high level of evidence to guide practice. At present, aggressive medical therapy alone should be the default management for most patients. Endovascular intervention should be reserved for clinical trial settings or carefully selected salvage cases, until and unless new evidence emerges to change the risk–benefit calculus such as the promising use of balloon angioplasty in the BASIS trial. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1374 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Outcomes of the Ovation Stent Graft System: Single-Center Experience
by Gianluigi Fino, Giacomo Isernia, Gianbattista Parlani, Adriana Belardi, Francescopio Del Mastro, Enrico Cieri, Massimo Lenti and Gioele Simonte
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4177; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124177 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 376
Abstract
Background/Objective: To report mid-term to long-term outcome data for endovascular aortic repair using the Ovation stent graft system (Endologix, Santa Rosa, CA) for the correction of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in a single center. Methods: All patients treated with the Ovation [...] Read more.
Background/Objective: To report mid-term to long-term outcome data for endovascular aortic repair using the Ovation stent graft system (Endologix, Santa Rosa, CA) for the correction of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in a single center. Methods: All patients treated with the Ovation stent graft between December 2011 and February 2018 were included. Patient demographics, anatomical and operative details, as well as follow- up data including complications, the need for further interventions, and mortality were recorded prospectively in an electronic dataset and analyzed. Results: A total of 99 patients (86.10% males; mean age 73.6 ± 7.26 years) were treated with the Ovation stent graft. The mean maximal aortic diameter was 53.7 ± 8.8 mm mm. The main indications for Ovation use were small iliac accesses and thrombus/calcification at the proximal neck level. The technical success rate was 93.06%. No perioperative reintervention or limb occlusion was reported. Two graft-related perioperative adverse events were recorded. At a mean follow up of 82.70 ± 40 months, cumulative late survival was 97.90%, 92.60%, 81.00%, 73.40%, 48.70%, and 45.10%, respectively, at 12, 24, 48, 60, 108, and 120 months. No AAA-related death was recorded. Actuarial freedom from reintervention rate was 97.90%, 95.70%, 92.10%, and 80.10%, respectively, at 12, 24, 60, 108, and 120 months; estimated freedom from conversion was 98.90%, 97.70%, and 95.20% at 24, 60, 108, and 120 months. Conclusions: The Ovation stent graft demonstrated durable AAA exclusion even in complex anatomies evidenced by successful aneurysm exclusion and mid- to long-term freedom from aneurysm-related mortality. However, in this series, the not insignificant graft-related adverse event rate suggested the need for structural improvements, which were implemented in the next-generation devices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State of the Art in Invasive Vascular Interventions (Second Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 706 KiB  
Article
The Performance of the Endurant Endoprosthesis in an Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm with a Wide or Conical-Shaped Infrarenal Neck Anatomy
by Maaike Plug, Suzanne Holewijn, Armelle Meershoek, Daphne van der Veen and Michel M. P. J. Reijnen
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4133; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124133 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 438
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Wide and conical-shaped infrarenal necks are risk factors for neck-related complications after Endovascular Aorta Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of the Endurant endoprosthesis in wide/conical-shaped aortic neck anatomies compared to its performance in a [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Wide and conical-shaped infrarenal necks are risk factors for neck-related complications after Endovascular Aorta Aneurysm Repair (EVAR). The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of the Endurant endoprosthesis in wide/conical-shaped aortic neck anatomies compared to its performance in a normal infrarenal neck (reference group). Methods: A single-center, retrospective observational cohort study was performed, including consecutive subjects with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, treated electively with an Endurant endoprosthesis. The primary endpoint was the freedom from aneurysm-related reinterventions through 1 year. Secondary endpoints included proximal fixation failure, type IA endoleak, stent migration, aneurysm sac remodeling, aneurysm-related mortality, freedom from reinterventions throughout available follow-up, and rupture. Results: A total of 268 patients were included, with a mean age of 73.3 years, and 85.1% were male. Freedom from aneurysm-related reinterventions was significantly lower in the wide-neck group (60.0%) compared to the reference group (81.1%; p = 0.018) but not for the conical-neck group (70.3%; p = 0.286). Median time to first reintervention was 1.7 (IQR 0.8; 4.4 years) in the reference group, 2.9 years (IQR 0.3; 5.0 years) in the wide-neck group (p = 0.547) and 3.8 years (IQR 0.4; 6.5) in the conical-neck group (p = 0.123). The proximal fixation failure rate was 7.4% in the wide-neck group compared to 3.3% in the reference group (p = 0.155) and 1.7% in the conical-neck group (p = 0.525). The type IA endoleak rate was 4.9% in the wide-neck group versus 3.3% in the reference group (p = 0.250). Conclusions: In the group with wide necks, reintervention-free survival was lower compared to the reference group, which seems to be driven by proximal fixation failure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 801 KiB  
Article
Ultra-Long-Term CT Angiography Evaluation of Patients Treated with Covered Stents for Visceral Aneurysms: A Single Center Case Series
by Marcello Andrea Tipaldi, Nicolò Ubaldi, Edoardo Ronconi, Michela Ortenzi, Francesco Arbia, Gianluigi Orgera, Miltiadis Krokidis, Tommaso Rossi, Pasqualino Sirignano, Luigi Rizzo and Michele Rossi
Diagnostics 2025, 15(12), 1481; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15121481 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 423
Abstract
Objective: Endovascular repair of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) and visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPAs) using covered stent grafts is a novel technique that preserves efferent vessel patency and prevents end-organ ischemia; however, long-term results are lacking in the literature. This study aims to evaluate [...] Read more.
Objective: Endovascular repair of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) and visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPAs) using covered stent grafts is a novel technique that preserves efferent vessel patency and prevents end-organ ischemia; however, long-term results are lacking in the literature. This study aims to evaluate ultra-long-term outcomes (>5 years) using CT angiography (CTA) and technical aspects of covered stents in treating VAAs and VAPAs. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on patients with VAAs and VAPAs treated with stent grafts between 2004 and 2023. The study included an ultra-long-term follow-up using CTA. Stent graft patency, aneurysm characteristics, technical success, 30-day and long-term follow-up clinical success, and mortality were assessed. Results: Among 23 patients presenting with VAAs and VAPAs treated exclusively with covered stents implantation, 7 (mean age: 68 years, SD 14), including 5 with VAAs and 2 with VAPAs, met the inclusion criteria for the study. Six of the seven patients underwent elective procedures with no significant periprocedural complications. Both technical and 30-day clinical success rates were 100%. The mean follow-up period was 10 years (125 months SD 53). At the 5-year follow-up, 71% of stent grafts remained patent. No patient experienced aneurysm sac revascularization or rupture. Stent obstruction did not affect survival. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that endovascular covered stenting is a durable and effective treatment for VAAs and VAPAs, even in the ultra-long term, with a patency rate of 71% at a mean CTA follow-up of 125 months, the longest reported to date and no cases of sac revascularization. Stent thrombosis was significantly associated with VAPAs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop