Search Results (88)

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy, with a current 5-year survival rate in the United States of approximately 13.3%. Although the current standard for resectable pancreatic cancer most commonly includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to a curative resection, surgery, in the majority of patients, has historically been palliative. The latter interventions include open or laparoscopic bypass of the bile duct or stomach in cases of obstructive jaundice or gastric outlet obstruction, respectively. Non-surgical interventional therapies started with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), both as a palliative maneuver in unresectable patients with obstructive jaundice and to improve liver function in patients whose surgery was delayed. Likewise, interventional radiologic techniques included the placement of plastic and ultimately self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) through PTBD tracts in patients with unresectable cancer as well as percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients who developed cholecystitis in the context of malignant obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stent placement (plastic/SEMS) were subsequently used both preoperatively and palliatively, and this was followed by, or undertaken in conjunction with, endoscopic gastro-duodenal SEMS placement for gastric outlet obstruction. Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was initially used to cytologically diagnose and stage pancreatic cancer, early palliation included celiac block or ablation for intractable pain. However, it took the development of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) to facilitate a myriad of palliative procedures: cholecystoduodenal, choledochoduodenal, gastrohepatic, and gastroenteric anastomoses for cholecystitis, obstructive jaundice, and gastric outlet obstruction, respectively. In this review, we outline these procedures, which have variably supplanted surgery for the palliation of pancreatic cancer in this rapidly evolving field. Full article

In the management of cholangiocarcinoma, effective biliary drainage and accurate diagnosis are vital to allow further treatment. Confirmation of tissue diagnosis and molecular characterization is also required to guide future treatment options including surgery and chemotherapy as well as the possible use of personalized treatments that target specific mutations present within individual tumours. Initial CT or MRI scans may be followed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to obtain tissue samples. However, these methods often fall short due to difficulty in accessing entire bile duct strictures. SpyGlass cholangioscopy can improve diagnosis, yet may fail to provide sufficient tissue for molecular characterization. Here we present a perspective on the development of snake-like agile robots with integrated optical imaging and Raman spectroscopy. These robots could improve the mapping of the biliary tree and the precision of biopsy collection and allow tissue analysis in situ, as well as facilitating stenting to restore the flow of bile. A multidisciplinary approach that brings together clinicians, pathologists, and engineers is required to develop these new robotic technologies and improve patient outcomes. Full article

Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) has emerged as a promising alternative for biliary decompression in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO), used either as a first-line approach or after other interventions have failed. This study aimed to evaluate the aggregated efficacy and safety of EUS-GBD in this patient population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out across PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to 9 January 2024, to identify studies reporting outcomes of EUS-GBD in MDBO cases. The primary endpoint assessed was clinical success, while secondary endpoints included technical success and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Pooled outcomes were calculated using a random-effects model and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Seven studies encompassing a total of 193 patients were included in the analysis. The combined clinical success rate for EUS-GBD was 88.1% [95% CI: 78.9–94.9%], while the technical success rate was 99.2% [95% CI: 97.5–100%]. The overall AE rate was 13.7% [95% CI: 9.3–18.8%], with the majority being mild to moderate in severity; no fatal complications were reported. Subgroup analyses indicated that use of smaller lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) (<15 mm) was associated with slightly higher clinical success (93.3% [95% CI: 72.4–99.9%]) compared to larger stents (≥15 mm) (87.1% [95% CI: 78.8–93.5%]), and a marginally lower rate of AEs (12.3% [95% CI: 6.4–19.7%] vs. 15.2% [95% CI: 6.5–26.6%]). Conclusions: EUS-GBD demonstrates excellent technical performance, high clinical efficacy, and a manageable safety profile in patients with MDBO and a patent cystic duct. Full article

Background/Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) using a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) is an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary drainage; however, FCSEMSs may cause intrahepatic bile duct (IHD) obstruction and cholangitis. In this study, we developed an FCSEMS with multiple self-made side holes at its tip and evaluated its safety and efficacy. Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent EUS-HGS with FCSEMS placement between April 2022 and October 2023. Fifty patients received a conventional FCSEMS, and 50 received an FCSEMS with multiple self-made side holes. Technical and clinical success, residual contrast in the IHD, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and adverse events (AEs) were then evaluated. The clinical success rates were 98% and 90% for the side hole and conventional FCEMS groups, respectively. The amount of residual contrast in the IHD was lower in the side hole group (0% vs. 12%, p = 0.027). RBO incidence was significantly lower in the side hole group (8% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), with migration as the primary cause in the conventional group. Early AEs, including segmental cholangitis, occurred only in the conventional group. During reintervention, all stents were safely removed. Conclusions: The FCSEMSs with multiple side holes reduced IHD occlusion and cholangitis, improving biliary drainage and safety. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. Full article

Background: Endoscopic treatment is one of the first-line treatments for bile leaks after hepatic surgery. However, detailed reports of endoscopic treatment for bile leaks after hepatic resection (HR) or liver transplantation (LT) are scarce. The outcomes of endoscopic treatment for bile leaks after hepatic surgery were examined, and factors related to successful treatment were identified. Methods: A total of 122 patients underwent endoscopic treatment for bile leaks after hepatic surgery. The diagnosis of a bile leak is based on the ISGLS criteria. The decision to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) is made based on the amount of drainage output, laboratory data, clinical symptoms, and CT scan findings. In our study, the site of the bile leak was assessed using ERC. Endoscopic stents were placed to bridge across the bile leak site as much as possible. Otherwise, stents were placed near the leak site. Endoscopic stents were replaced every 2–3 months until an improvement in the bile leak was observed with or without biliary strictures. The outcomes of endoscopic treatment and the factors related to clinical success were evaluated. Results: Seventy-four patients with HR and forty-eight patients with LT were treated endoscopically. Technical and clinical success was achieved in 89% (109/122) and 82% (100/122) of patients, respectively. Three (2%) patients died from uncontrollable bile leaks. Bridging stent placement (p < 0.001), coexistent percutaneous drainage (p = 0.0025), and leak severity (p = 0.015) were identified as independent factors related to the clinical success of endoscopic treatment. During a median observation period of 1162 days after the achievement of clinical success, bile leak recurrence was observed in only three cases (3%). Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective for bile leaks after hepatic surgery. Bridging stent placement across the leak site is the most crucial factor for clinical success. Full article

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal cancers, characterized by late diagnosis, rapid progression, and limited therapeutic options. Despite advancements, only 20% of patients are eligible for surgical resection at diagnosis, the sole curative treatment. Multidisciplinary evaluation is critical to optimize care, stratifying patients based on resectability into resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced, and metastatic stages. Preoperative imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), remains central for staging, for vascular assessment, and tissue acquisition. Endoscopic and systemic approaches are pivotal for addressing complications like biliary obstruction and improving outcomes. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered for years the gold standard for biliary drainage, although EUS-guided drainage is increasingly utilized due to its efficacy in both resectable and unresectable disease. Systemic therapies play a key role in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings, with ongoing trials exploring their impact on survival and resectability chance. This review highlights the evolving multidisciplinary approaches tailored to the disease stage, focusing on biliary drainage techniques, systemic therapies, and their integration into comprehensive care pathways for PDAC. The continuous refinement of these strategies offers incremental survival benefits and underscores the importance of personalized, multidisciplinary management. Full article

Background/Objectives: Performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy remains challenging, frequently necessitating the use of forward-viewing endoscopes. Given the challenge in endoscope selection based on the type of altered anatomy, the aim of this study was to examine ERCP success rates by specific endoscopes for different anatomy types. Methods: This single-center retrospective study examined ERCPs performed in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy during an 18-year period. Enteroscopy success, cannulation success, and intervention success rates were compared between the different anatomy and endoscope types. Results: This study included a total of 334 adult patients (665 total ERCPs) with altered anatomy. The pediatric colonoscope was most frequently utilized (32.2%), and the majority of procedures were performed for biliary indications. Enteroscopy success was 82.2% in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), 97% in Billroth II, 91.5% in Whipple, and 93.2% in Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ). Cannulation success was 90.5% in RYGB, 90.5% in Billroth II, 83.6% in Whipple, and 90.6% in RYHJ. Intervention success was 88.2% in Billroth II, 65.1% in RYGB, 81.6% in Whipple, and 87.5% in RYHJ. In patients with RYGB and RYHJ, SBE was utilized most frequently, with rotational enteroscopy having the highest success rates. The overall adverse event rate was 5.1%, with the majority of these being mild in severity. Conclusions: This large retrospective study found ERCP with forward-viewing endoscopes to be safe and effective for a variety of surgically altered anatomy types. Despite recent advances seen with endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage procedures, this study advocates for ERCP as the initial approach for pancreaticobiliary access in surgically altered anatomy. Full article

Pancreatic cancer is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy has become the standard diagnostic modality per the guidelines. The use of EUS has been growing for providing various treatments in patients with pancreatic cancers: biliary and gallbladder drainage for those with malignant biliary obstruction, gastroenterostomy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, celiac plexus/ganglia neurolysis for pain control, radiofrequency ablation, placement of fiducial markers, and injection of local chemotherapeutic agents. In this review, we explore the recent clinical studies evaluating the EUS-guided treatments in pancreatic cancer. Full article

This review aims to focus on what we know about the management of biliary strictures of unknown etiology, especially exploring our diagnostic armamentarium in the setting of indeterminate biliary strictures. Presently, this is a current issue that has a relevant impact both on patient prognosis, often delaying diagnosis, and on overall costs associated with repeating diagnostic procedures, sometimes performed with very expensive devices. We also focus on current biliary drainage approaches, providing an overview of therapeutic options, endoscopic or not. Full article

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions have revolutionized the management of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), providing minimally invasive alternatives with improved outcomes. These procedures have significantly reduced the need for high-risk surgical interventions or percutaneous alternatives and have provided effective palliative care for patients with advanced gastrointestinal and bilio-pancreatic malignancies. EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) techniques, including hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), and antegrade stenting (EUS-AS), offer high technical and clinical success rates, with a good safety profile particularly when Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not feasible. EUS-HGS, which allows biliary drainage by trans-gastric route, is primarily used for proximal stenosis or in case of surgically altered anatomy; EUS-CDS with Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) for distal MBO (dMBO), EUS-AS as an alternative of EUS-HGS in the bridge-to-surgery scenario or when retrograde access is not possible and EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with LAMS in case of dMBO with cystic duct patent without dilation of common bile duct (CDB). EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has already established its role as an effective alternative to surgical GE and enteral self-expandable metal stent, providing relief from GOO with fewer complications and faster recovery times. However, we do not yet have strong evidence on how to combine the different EUS-guided drainage techniques with EUS-GE in the setting of double obstruction. This comprehensive review aims to synthesize growing evidence on this topic by randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series not only to summarize the efficacy, safety, and technical aspects of these procedures but also to propose a treatment algorithm based essentially on the anatomy and stage of the neoplasm to guide clinical decision-making, incorporating the principles of personalized medicine. This review also highlights the transformative impact of EUS-guided interventions on the treatment landscape for MBO and GOO. These techniques offer safer and more effective options than traditional approaches, with the potential for widespread clinical adoption. Further research is needed to refine these procedures, expand their applications, and improve patient care and quality of life. Full article

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a key therapeutic procedure in diseases of the pancreas or bile ducts. The understanding and effective management of the risks associated with the procedure, especially in the context of possible infectious complications, is crucial for patients’ safety. The aim of this review was to analyze the results of studies on antibiotic prophylaxis for infectious complications of ERCP, pancreatoscopy, and cholangioscopy. Methods: This study is a review of the articles available in PubMed, Medline, and Embase published in the last 30 years. Results: Nineteen studies and six sets of guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP were retrieved. Conclusions: Based on the available studies and recommendations, it can be concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP is beneficial for immunocompromised patients or those at risk of bacterial endocarditis. In other groups of patients, antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk post-ERCP bacteremia but does not significantly reduce the risk of cholangitis and infectious complications. The effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients at risk of incomplete biliary drainage needs to be verified in further studies. Full article

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has dramatically spread and improved in the last two decades and is changing the paradigm of drainage in case of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). EUS-BD can be achieved from different routes, including the common bile duct (choledochoduodenostomy), intrahepatic bile ducts (hepaticogastrostomy), and gallbladder as a rescue (cholecystogastrostomy/cholecystoduodenostomy). EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is a valuable option for biliary drainage in MBO when ERCP fails or is not feasible. EUS-HGS has demonstrated high efficacy with a good rate of technical and clinical success. The safety profile is also overall favorable, although severe adverse events may occur in a significant proportion of patients. From a technical perspective, EUS-HGS is considered one of the most demanding procedures in biliopancreatic endoscopy, requiring multiple steps and high technical skills and experience. In this comprehensive review, technical tips and clinical outcomes of EUS-HGS are reviewed according to the latest evidence in the literature. Full article

Background: Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) is valuable for assessing malignant biliary strictures; however, biliary drainage prior to POCS often hinders accurate diagnosis. Objectives: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the feasibility of POCS using a newly developed cholangioscope, CHF-B290, during initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for malignant biliary strictures. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients who underwent initial ERCP for malignant biliary strictures at two institutions between January 2018 and March 2022. Patients who underwent initial ERCP with POCS were classified into the POCS group, and those without POCS were classified into the non-POCS group. To prevent post-POCS cholangitis, the original irrigation system for CHF-B290 was used in all POCS examinations. The primary endpoint was the rate of post-ERCP biliary infections, and the secondary endpoints were other ERCP-related complications, including pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation. Results: Overall, 53 and 94 patients were included in the POCS and non-POCS groups, respectively. For the primary endpoint, the rate of post-ERCP biliary infection was not significantly different between the two groups (1.9% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.42). For the secondary endpoints, no significant differences were observed in the rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis (5.7% vs. 6.4%, p = 1.00) and other ERCP-related complications. The overall complication rate was 9.4% in the POCS group and 13% in the non-POCS group (p = 0.60). Conclusions: POCS during the initial ERCP for malignant biliary strictures is feasible. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Biliary tract injuries are a recognized complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Early diagnosis and prompt management are crucial to minimize complications such as bile leaks, strictures, and fistula formation. This case report highlights the use of a biodegradable biliary stent in managing a complex biliary injury and discusses the impact of delayed diagnosis on treatment outcomes. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 30-year-old male who sustained a Strasberg E2 biliary tract injury during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Initially misdiagnosed, the injury was only recognized on the fourth postoperative day. The patient underwent a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and subsequently developed a postoperative biliary fistula, which was managed with percutaneous drainage. A biodegradable biliary stent was later placed to address a stricture and minimize the need for future interventions. One year later, the patient presented with symptoms of cholangitis, and radiological findings revealed a narrowing of the biliary lumen. The stricture was resolved and an endoscopic gastrojejunal shunt was placed to prevent further complications. The patient is currently in good condition with no signs of further complications. Conclusions: This case emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis in managing biliary tract injuries and highlights the potential of biodegradable stents to reduce the need for repeat interventions. Despite a delayed diagnosis necessitating complex surgical procedures, the use of a biodegradable stent proved effective in managing postoperative complications. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of biodegradable stents in similar clinical scenarios. Full article

Background/Objectives: Covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMS) are commonly used to treat malignant distal biliary obstructions. A 10-mm CSEMS carries the risk of obstructing the pancreatic and cystic duct orifices by adhering to the bile duct; therefore, postoperative pancreatitis and cholecystitis are reported to occur at a certain frequency. We have adopted a new drainage technique for malignant distal biliary obstruction called ‘‘double-slim SEMS stenting” (DSS), where two small-diameter CSEMS are placed side-by-side. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of biliary drainage using DSS with those of conventional CSEMS. Methods: In total, 50 patients who underwent endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant distal biliary obstructions between April 2019 and March 2022 at Hyogo Medical University Hospital were enrolled. Patients were divided into DSS and Conventional groups, and the technical success rate, clinical success rate, adverse events, success rate for reintervention, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate, and time to RBO (TRBO) were evaluated. Results: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the DSS (n = 20) and Conventional groups (n = 30). The technical and clinical success rates were 100% in the DSS group. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (DSS/Conventional: 10.0% [2/20]/20.0% [6/30]) (p = 0.34). No acute cholecystitis was observed in the DSS group. The incidence rates of RBO were 30% (6/20) and 43% (13/30) in the DSS and Conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.92). The median TRBO in the DSS group was 378 days, while the TRBO in the Conventional group was 195 days (p = 0.03), resulting in significantly longer TRBO in the DSS group. Conclusions: DSS emerges as a viable and safe approach for biliary drainage in malignant distal biliary obstruction, demonstrating a lower incidence of adverse events and longer TRBO compared to conventional CSEMS. Full article