Search Results (37)

Background/Objectives: Cochlear “injury” is thought to be a significant cause of tinnitus in patients with hearing loss. Interestingly, individuals with normal hearing may also experience tinnitus. This study evaluates otoacoustic distortion product emissions (DPOAEs) in individuals with normal hearing who experience tinnitus perception. Methods: In this prospective study, the tinnitus group (TG) consisted of 34 subjects with tinnitus (four unilaterally) and normal hearing (threshold ≤ 25 dBHL at 0.25–8 kHz). The control group (CG) comprised 10 healthy volunteers (20 ears) without tinnitus and normal hearing. Medical history was recorded, and all participants underwent a complete otolaryngological examination, pure tone audiometry, and DPOAE recording (DP-gram, L1 = 55 dB, L2 = 65 dB, for F2: 619–10,000 Hz). Moreover, participants in the TG completed a detailed tinnitus history (with self-rated loudness scoring) and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (Greek-version THI-G) and underwent tinnitus analysis. Results: The recorded mean DPOAE values during the DP-gram of the CG were significantly larger in amplitude at low (t-test, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.09) and high frequencies (t-test, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.02) compared with the TG. Tinnitus assessment showed tinnitus pitch matching at the frequency area in the DP-gram, where the acceptance recording criteria were not met. There were no statistically significant differences in tinnitus onset, self-rated loudness scores of >70, and severe disability (THI-G > 58) for TG subjects in whom DPOAEs were not recorded at frequencies of ≤1000 Hz. Participants with abnormal DPOAEs at around 4000 Hz had tinnitus of sudden onset and severe disability (THI-G > 58). Finally, those with pathological recordings of DPOAEs at ≥6000 Hz had gradual onset tinnitus (Pearson Chi-square test, p < 0.05). Conclusions: DPOAEs in normal hearing individuals with tinnitus show lower amplitudes in low and high frequencies compared with normal hearing individuals without tinnitus. The tinnitus matched-frequency coincided with the frequency area where DPOAEs were abnormal. Full article

Background/Objectives: Obesity is a risk factor for several diseases; however, less has been researched about how diet-induced obesity may affect the auditory system. In this sense, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of diet-induced obesity on the functionality and integrity of the outer hair cells, a key component of the organ of Corti, inside the cochlea. Furthermore, we hypothesized that adipose tissue (AT) status is associated with impaired outer hair cell auditory amplification in young C57BL/6 mice, contributing to increased vulnerability to hearing damage. Methods: Weaning male C57BL/6J mice (7 weeks old) weighing 22–23 g were divided into two diet groups: (i) a control diet or (ii) a high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 or 16 weeks. Metabolic parameters (body and AT weight, glucose tolerance test), AT dysfunction markers (AT remodeling, adipocyte size, crown-like structures), and outer hair cell function (distortion products otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) threshold and amplitudes) and integrity (hair cells cell count) were evaluated. Results: We observed that mice fed an HFD for 16 weeks showed a higher DPOAE threshold against stimuli at 16 KHz and a lower count of outer hair cells in the medial section of the cochlea. These results demonstrate a correlation between body and AT weight specifically at 16 weeks of treatment, the time point at which we observed a marked AT dysfunction. Conclusions: Taken together, our results suggest that obese mice with AT dysfunction have an altered auditory efferent system, characterized by a higher DPOAE threshold and a lower outer hair cell count in the medial section, which may impact signal transduction. Full article

Background: Occupational hearing loss (OHL) is a primary concern in industrial settings. In hospitals, the healthcare workers are also exposed to noise and chemical agents, the reported hearing loss in this occupation is underestimated. Hearing examination is routinely evaluated in the range of conventional frequencies, which may not detect hearing problems early. Therefore, this study aimed to reveal the hearing thresholds among medical personnel exposed to loud noise and/or chemical environments, estimating the prevalence of hearing loss using four different audiological methods. Methods: One hundred and thirty-one medical personnel were recruited from different units at the same hospital and grouped into noise, chemical, and mixed exposure categories. The hearing thresholds were assessed using four audiological methods, conventional audiometry (CA), extended high-frequency audiometry (EHFA), standard frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and ultra-high-frequency DPOAE. Statistical analyses were performed using R. Results: Ultra-high-frequency DPOAE and EHFA showed a higher prevalence of hearing loss than CA and DPOAE. Even CA usually demonstrated hearing threshold within normal limits, this study found a notch audiogram pattern indicating a decline in hearing loss over time at frequencies of 2, 3, and 4 kHz in each age group and a sign at a frequency of 6 kHz. Conclusions: Evidence of hearing loss can be identified with ultra-high-frequency DPOAE and EHFA, despite conventional audiometry indicating normal hearing thresholds. Full article

Pesticide exposure poses a significant health risk, with emerging evidence suggesting its impact on auditory function. This study investigated the effects of pesticide exposure on hearing in young rural residents living near agricultural areas in Chile’s O’Higgins Region. We evaluated 51 participants (31 exposed, 20 unexposed) aged 18–35 years, using comprehensive audiological assessments including high-frequency audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Participants were classified based on residential proximity to agricultural areas, with exposed individuals living around 400 m or less from monoculture fields. Results revealed significant differences in high-frequency hearing thresholds (14 and 16 kHz) in exposed individuals. The exposed group showed a higher number of absent DPOAEs and reduced ABR wave V amplitude in the right ear compared to the unexposed group. Additionally, the wave V/I ratio was significantly lower in exposed individuals. These findings suggest that pesticide exposure, even without direct occupational contact, may induce measurable changes in auditory function, particularly affecting high-frequency hearing and neural responses. These results emphasize the need for enhanced monitoring and protective measures for populations residing near agricultural areas where pesticides are extensively used. Full article

Background/Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine whether the strong acoustic stimuli used in vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing contribute to distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level reduction due to noise-induced hearing loss. Methods: The DPOAE levels were measured routinely to evaluate vestibular balance disorders with sensorineural hearing loss and to monitor changes in cochlear function before and after VEMP. The changes in DPOAE levels after VEMP testing in 174 patients (80 males and 94 females; median age, 53 years [interquartile range, 39–67 years; range, 15–85 years]) who were examined in the vertigo outpatient clinic between June 2021 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The DPOAE levels decreased significantly after VEMP testing at 1.4 kHz, 2 kHz, 2.8 kHz, sum all 1/2 octave, and average 1/2 octave (1–6 kHz). The decrease in DPOAE levels at 6 kHz exhibited a significant negative linear correlation with age (the coefficient of determination: 0.0189, p = 0.01), but not sex or side. Conclusions: The strong sound stimulation used in VEMP testing can decrease DPOAE levels. The frequencies at which DPOAE levels decreased significantly were overtones of the stimulus frequency, suggesting a possible effect of acoustic stimulation. VEMP testing can be an invasive test method and should be performed with detailed consideration of the risks and benefits. The age factor can influence the decrease in DPOAE levels in VEMP testing. Full article

Flight line personnel are constantly exposed to noise and jet fuel while working on flight lines. Studies suggest that jet fuel in combination with noise affects hearing loss more than noise exposure alone. This study examined the combined effects of jet fuel and noise exposure on the hearing of flight line personnel stationed at Japan Air Self-Defense Force Air Bases (Hamamatsu, Matsushima, Hyakuri, Yokota, and Iruma) and US Air Force Air Bases (Kadena and Misawa) in Japan. Samples were collected from all participants, 97 flightline-exposed and 71 control volunteers, to measure their individual noise levels with a personal sound level meter and volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) with a chemical sampling pump during a single shift. Blood samples were collected post shift. Urine samples (entire void) were collected prior to the shift (morning first void) and post shift. VOCs were measured in air, blood, and urine. An audiometric test battery, consisting of immittance measurements, audiograms, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and the auditory brain response, was conducted after the shift to examine the hearing of participants. Total VOCs in personal air samples were in the ppb range for each group. Tinnitus and temporary hearing loss were reported in audiological histories but were also present in some controls. Noise levels on the flight line were greater than the action level for requiring hearing protection and exceeded exposure limits, but all exposed subjects reported wearing hearing protection. Audiometric tests identified significant differences and trends between flight line and control personnel, indicating the potential for hearing disorders. In spite of very low levels of VOC exposure and wearing hearing protection for noise, there is still the potential for hearing issues in flight line personnel. Full article

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a new member of the coronavirus family. While respiratory transmission is the main route, concerns have arisen regarding possible vertical transmission, which refers to the transmission of the virus from mother to fetus through the dissemination of viral particles in the amniotic fluid. Fetal viral infection via the placenta can affect the formation of the auditory system and lead to congenital hearing disorders. The aim of this research was to investigate the effects of vertical exposure to COVID-19 on the auditory system of newborns. Methodology: The study included a study group (SG) and a control group (CG). Selected during neonatal hearing screening, the SG consisted of 23 infants up to 1 year old whose mothers had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. The CG consisted of 15 infants whose mothers became pregnant after the end of the pandemic, had tested negative for COVID-19, and had no respiratory symptoms during pregnancy. The assessments for both groups were brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), tympanometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The research was divided into two studies, one cross-sectional and the other longitudinal. Results: All participants exhibited absolute latencies within the normal range for waves I, III, and V, although in the SG, there was a statistically significant increase in the latency of wave I in the left ear. In terms of OAEs, in the SG, there appeared to be a tendency for TEOAEs to be absent at high frequencies. Over several months, there was a general decrease in the amplitude of high-frequency responses in both TEOAEs and DPOAEs. Conclusion: No evidence was found that vertical exposure to COVID-19 causes hearing loss, although there were signs of possible deterioration in hair cell functioning. Full article

COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. During and after COVID-19, audiovestibular symptoms and impairments have been reported. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impacts of COVID-19 on the peripheral and central auditory systems of children and adolescents following the acute COVID-19 phase based on behavioral, electroacoustic, and electrophysiological audiological assessments. Methods: This is a primary, prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study of 23 children aged 8 to 15 years who acquired confirmed COVID-19 and who, before infection, had not had any auditory complaints or school complications. The results were compared with pre-pandemic data collected from a similar group of 23 children who had normal peripheral and central hearing and good school performance. Each participant answered a questionnaire about child development, school, and health history and underwent tests including pure-tone audiometry and high-frequency audiometry, imitanciometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. They also received tests of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials, Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials, Dichotic Digits Test, Sentence Identification Test, Dichotic Consonant–Vowel Test, Frequency Pattern Test, and Gaps-In-Noise Test. Results: Significant differences were observed between the groups, with the study group showing worse thresholds compared to the control group at both standard audiometric frequencies and at higher frequencies, although both groups were still within normal limits (p ≤ 0.05). In addition, the study group had a higher prevalence of absent responses, as identified by otoacoustic emissions and acoustic reflexes. In terms of central auditory performance, the study group showed ABRs with significantly longer latencies of waves I, III, and V compared to the control group. The study group also performed less well on the Dichotic Digits and Pediatric Speech Identification tests. Conclusions: COVID-19 appears to alter the auditory system, both peripherally at the level of the outer hair cells and more centrally. Full article

Understanding speech in noise is particularly difficult for individuals occupationally exposed to noise due to a mix of noise-induced auditory lesions and the energetic masking of speech signals. For years, the monitoring of conventional audiometric thresholds has been the usual method to check and preserve auditory function. Recently, suprathreshold deficits, notably, difficulties in understanding speech in noise, has pointed out the need for new monitoring tools. The present study aims to identify the most important variables that predict speech in noise understanding in order to suggest a new method of hearing status monitoring. Physiological (distortion products of otoacoustic emissions, electrocochleography) and behavioral (amplitude and frequency modulation detection thresholds, conventional and extended high-frequency audiometric thresholds) variables were collected in a population of individuals presenting a relatively homogeneous occupational noise exposure. Those variables were used as predictors in a statistical model (random forest) to predict the scores of three different speech-in-noise tests and a self-report of speech-in-noise ability. The extended high-frequency threshold appears to be the best predictor and therefore an interesting candidate for a new way of monitoring noise-exposed professionals. Full article

Background: It is assumed that speech comprehension deficits in background noise are caused by age-related or acquired hearing loss. Methods: We examined young, middle-aged, and older individuals with and without hearing threshold loss using pure-tone (PT) audiometry, short-pulsed distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (pDPOAEs), auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs), speech comprehension (OLSA), and syllable discrimination in quiet and noise. Results: A noticeable decline of hearing sensitivity in extended high-frequency regions and its influence on low-frequency-induced ABRs was striking. When testing for differences in OLSA thresholds normalized for PT thresholds (PTTs), marked differences in speech comprehension ability exist not only in noise, but also in quiet, and they exist throughout the whole age range investigated. Listeners with poor speech comprehension in quiet exhibited a relatively lower pDPOAE and, thus, cochlear amplifier performance independent of PTT, smaller and delayed ABRs, and lower performance in vowel-phoneme discrimination below phase-locking limits (/o/-/u/). When OLSA was tested in noise, listeners with poor speech comprehension independent of PTT had larger pDPOAEs and, thus, cochlear amplifier performance, larger ASSR amplitudes, and higher uncomfortable loudness levels, all linked with lower performance of vowel-phoneme discrimination above the phase-locking limit (/i/-/y/). Conslusions: This study indicates that listening in noise in humans has a sizable disadvantage in envelope coding when basilar-membrane compression is compromised. Clearly, and in contrast to previous assumptions, both good and poor speech comprehension can exist independently of differences in PTTs and age, a phenomenon that urgently requires improved techniques to diagnose sound processing at stimulus onset in the clinical routine. Full article

Individuals with Kabuki syndrome type 1 (KS1) often have hearing loss recognized in middle childhood. Current clinical dogma suggests that this phenotype is caused by frequent infections due to the immune deficiency in KS1 and/or secondary to structural abnormalities of the ear. To clarify some aspects of hearing loss, we collected information on hearing status from 21 individuals with KS1 and found that individuals have both sensorineural and conductive hearing loss, with the average age of presentation being 7 years. Our data suggest that while ear infections and structural abnormalities contribute to the observed hearing loss, these factors do not explain all loss. Using a KS1 mouse model, we found hearing abnormalities from hearing onset, as indicated by auditory brainstem response measurements. In contrast to mouse and human data for CHARGE syndrome, a disorder possessing overlapping clinical features with KS and a well-known cause of hearing loss and structural inner ear abnormalities, there are no apparent structural abnormalities of the cochlea in KS1 mice. The KS1 mice also display diminished distortion product otoacoustic emission levels, which suggests outer hair cell dysfunction. Combining these findings, our data suggests that KMT2D dysfunction causes sensorineural hearing loss compounded with external factors, such as infection. Full article

Hearing is normally evaluated up to 8 kHz, even though testing can easily be performed at higher frequencies (up to 16 or 20 kHz). The range beyond 8 kHz is often referred to as the extended high frequency (EHF) range. This study aimed to explore the relationship between EHF hearing thresholds (HTs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in adult subjects. Also of interest were the effects of the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), gender, ear side, and age. The main finding was that DPOAEs, both within the standard frequency (SF) range (0.125–8 kHz) and the EHF range (10–16 kHz), decrease as thresholds deteriorate. For both ranges, DPOAEs and HTs depend on age, even for those with normal hearing, although EHFs seem to be especially affected by age. The presence of SOAEs was the only other factor that significantly influenced DPOAE level. For both DPOAEs and HTs, only minor and non-significant effects were related to gender and ear side. It was concluded that DPOAEs in the EHF range appear to be good predictors of EHF HTs. Moreover, since DPOAEs and HTs in the EHF range both correlate with age, these two measures may be suitable markers for incipient presbycusis. Full article

Purpose: This study investigated the status of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) on cochlear function in a cohort of male/female participants with a wide age range. It examined whether there was a correlation between the presence of SOAEs and measurements of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), SOAEs and extended high-frequency (EHF) hearing thresholds. Methods: 463 participants (222 male, 241 female; age range 20–59 years) with pure-tone thresholds ≤25 dB HL for octave frequencies of 500–8000 Hz were included in the study, divided into three age groups (20–29, 30–39, and 40–59 years). Evaluations included EHF (9000–16,000 Hz) hearing thresholds and TEOAE, DPOAE and SOAE measures. Results: Multiple regression models showed that participants with SOAEs had larger expected amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for TEOAE and DPOAE responses than participants without SOAEs, holding gender and age variables constant. Spearman correlation tests identified deterioration in TEOAE and DPOAE amplitudes and SNRs, and EHF hearing thresholds with age in participants without SOAEs. Among participants with SOAEs, no significant decreases in TEOAE and DPOAE measures were shown in participants with older age. Nonetheless, as expected, EHF hearing thresholds did become worse with age, with or without SOAEs. Conclusions: Participants with identifiable SOAEs had greater TEOAE and DPOAE amplitudes and SNRs than participants without SOAEs. SOAEs appear to be a useful marker of cochlear health in adults. Full article

Newborn hearing screening is the best strategy to identify congenital deafness and hearing loss. The incidence of sensorineural hearing loss is 3 per 1000 for term newborns and up to 4 per 100 for newborns hospitalized in the NICU, therefore identification up to a maximum of 6 months has an optimal effect on neurocognitive development. Auditory testing techniques have evolved since the 1800s and currently include transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), the automated auditory brainstem response (ABR) or a combination of them. In our country we use auditory brainstem response (ABR) and otoacoustic emissions (OAE), thus we can identify up to 85% of hearing loss in the first 6 months of life. Full article

Musculocontractural Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) caused by pathogenic variants in CHST14 (mcEDS-CHST14) is a subtype of EDS characterized by multisystem malformations and progressive fragility-related manifestations. A recent international collaborative study showed that 55% of mcEDS-CHST14 patients had hearing loss (HL), more commonly of the high-frequency type. Here, we report the first systemic investigation of the otological features of patients with this disorder based on the world’s largest cohort at Shinshu University Hospital. Nine patients [18 ears; four male and five female patients; mean age, 18 years old (range, 10–28)] underwent comprehensive otological evaluation: audiogram, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) test, and tympanometry. The audiogram, available in all 18 ears, showed HL in eight patients (8/9, 89%) and in 14 ears (14/18, 78%): bilateral in six patients (6/9, 67%) and unilateral in two (2/9, 22%); mild in eight ears (8/18, 44%) and moderate in six (6/18, 33%); and high-frequency HL in five (5/18, 28%) and low-frequency HL in five (5/18, 28%). An air-bone gap was detected in one ear (1/18, 6%). DPOAE was available in 13 ears, with the presence of a response in five (5/13, 38%) and the absence in eight (8/13, 62%), including in three ears of normal hearing. Tympanometry results were available in 12 ears: Ad type in nine (9/12, 75%) and As type in one (1/12, 8.3%). Patients with mcEDS-CHST14 had a high prevalence of HL, typically sensorineural and bilateral, with mild to moderate severity, of high-frequency or low-frequency type, and sometimes with no DPOAE response. The pathophysiology underlying HL might be complex, presumably related to alterations of the tectorial membrane and/or the basilar membrane of Corti associated with disorganized collagen fibril networks. Regular and careful check-ups of hearing using multiple modalities are recommended for mcEDS-CHST14 patients. Full article