Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (53)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 723 KiB  
Article
The Anti-Nucleocapsid IgG Antibody as a Marker of SARS-CoV-2 Infection for Hemodialysis Patients
by Akemi Hara, Shun Watanabe, Toyoaki Sawano, Yuki Sonoda, Hiroaki Saito, Akihiko Ozaki, Masatoshi Wakui, Tianchen Zhao, Chika Yamamoto, Yurie Kobashi, Toshiki Abe, Takeshi Kawamura, Akira Sugiyama, Aya Nakayama, Yudai Kaneko, Hiroaki Shimmura and Masaharu Tsubokura
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 750; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070750 - 13 Jul 2025
Viewed by 622
Abstract
Background: Hemodialysis patients, due to impaired kidney function and compromised immune responses, face increased risks from SARS-CoV-2. Anti-nucleocapsid IgG (anti-IgG N) antibodies are a commonly used marker to assess prior infection in the general population; however, their efficacy for hemodialysis patients remains unclear. [...] Read more.
Background: Hemodialysis patients, due to impaired kidney function and compromised immune responses, face increased risks from SARS-CoV-2. Anti-nucleocapsid IgG (anti-IgG N) antibodies are a commonly used marker to assess prior infection in the general population; however, their efficacy for hemodialysis patients remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective study of 361 hemodialysis patients evaluated anti-IgG N antibodies for detecting prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antibody levels were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) over the four time points. Boxplots illustrated antibody distribution across sampling stages and infection status. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and optimal cutoff values. Results: Among the 361 hemodialysis patients, 36 (10.0%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sex distribution showed a trend toward significance (p = 0.05). Boxplot analysis showed that anti-IgG N levels remained low in non-infected patients but increased in infected patients, peaking at the third sampling. Anti-IgG N demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.973–0.865) but declined over time (p = 0.00525). The optimal cutoff at C1 was 0.01 AU/mL (sensitivity 1.00, specificity 0.94). Adjusted models had lower predictive value. Conclusions: Anti-IgG N antibodies showed high diagnostic accuracy for detecting prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in hemodialysis patients, though performance declined over time. These findings highlight the need for tailored diagnostic strategies in this vulnerable population. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 764 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Evaluation of the Chemiluminescence Immunoassay and ELISA for the Detection of Islet Autoantibodies in Type 1 Diabetes
by Elisa Danese, Claudia Piona, Mariateresa Rizza, Elena Tiziani, Laura Pighi, Elisa Morotti, Gian Luca Salvagno, Camilla Mattiuzzi, Claudio Maffeis and Giuseppe Lippi
Diagnostics 2025, 15(13), 1695; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131695 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 508
Abstract
Background: The early detection of type 1 diabetes (T1D) through screening for major islet autoantibodies is receiving increasing attention as a public health strategy, exemplified by the recent implementation of a pilot pediatric screening program in Italy. The transition from research-based screening to [...] Read more.
Background: The early detection of type 1 diabetes (T1D) through screening for major islet autoantibodies is receiving increasing attention as a public health strategy, exemplified by the recent implementation of a pilot pediatric screening program in Italy. The transition from research-based screening to large-scale population initiatives needs automated and standardized assays that are capable of processing extensive sample volumes. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance and comparability of a fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) compared to a conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of three classes of major islet antibodies—anti-GAD (GADA), anti-IA-2 (IA-2A), and anti-ZnT8 (ZnT8A). Methods: A total of 104 serum specimens were analyzed for each autoantibody using both ELISA (RSR and Medyzim, DYNES, DSX) and CLIA (MAGLUMI 800). Assay precision and linearity were assessed through intra-assay variability studies and dilution protocols. Methods agreement was evaluated with Passing–Bablok regression, Spearman’s correlation, Bland–Altman analysis, and Cohen’s kappa statistics. Results: The CLIA showed good precision and excellent linearity across clinically relevant concentration ranges of all islet antibodies. Correlation coefficients and categorical agreement between CLIA and ELISA were high (r > 0.96 and Cohen’s kappa >0.8 for all), with ZnT8A exhibiting the highest concordance. However, proportional biases were found, as CLIA systematically underestimated GADA and ZnT8A levels, while overestimated IA-2A compared to the ELISA. Conclusions: The CLIA displayed satisfactory precision and agreement with ELISA for GADA, IA-2A, and ZnT8A detection. Our findings support the use of these automated immunoassays in large-scale population initiatives for diagnosing T1D, but we also highlight the need for further efforts to achieve better inter-assay harmonization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Laboratory Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 731 KiB  
Article
Comparative Evaluation of Four Different Anti-CCP Assays for the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Diagnostic Performance Analysis
by Lydia Lamara Mahammed, Tamazouzt Hadjout, Asma Bensaci, Ryma Hamma, Ghalya Bousbia, Nawel Dahmani, Halima Ismail, Nadia Tamechmacht and Reda Djidjik
Diagnostics 2025, 15(10), 1293; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15101293 - 21 May 2025
Viewed by 1612
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies are highly specific markers for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Over the past decade, novel automating detection systems have been developed for anti-CCP detection. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of three fully automated anti-CCP [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies are highly specific markers for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Over the past decade, novel automating detection systems have been developed for anti-CCP detection. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performances of three fully automated anti-CCP assays in comparison to a conventional manual enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Methods: One hundred ninety-nine patients with rheumatic symptoms (100 with RA and 99 without RA) were tested for anti-CCP autoantibodies using four assays: a manual-ELISA (EUROIMMUN®), two chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIAs) performed on the MAGLUMI X3® and iFlash 1800® platforms, and an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) run on the UNI® analyzer. Results: The Kappa statistic indicated a moderate qualitative agreement among the EUROIMMUN, iFlash, and UNI assays (0.734 ≤ ĸ ≤ 0.778), while the MAGLUMI anti-CCP assay showed only weak-to-moderate agreement with the others (0.510 ≤ ĸ ≤ 0.628). A strong positive correlation was observed between anti-CCP levels measured by the four assays (0.747 ≤ rho ≤ 0.839). At the manufacturers’ cut-off values, sensitivities ranged from 76% to 99% and specificities from 69.7% to 99%, depending on the assay. However, at a fixed specificity of 95%, all the four assays showed good diagnostic performances for RA, with sensitivities ranging from 80% to 89% and positive likelihood ratios (LRs+) from 16 to 17.8. Conclusions: Our results revealed that at the manufacturers’ cut-offs, the UNI anti-CCP assay was the most valuable alternative to the conventional ELISA for diagnosing RA in our cohort. Nevertheless, after an appropriate adjustment of the thresholds, all the evaluated assays showed good diagnostic performances for RA. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Laboratory Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4883 KiB  
Article
Prevalence of Blastocystis spp. and Other Gastrointestinal Pathogens Among Patients Admitted to Research Hospitals in Campania Region, Italy
by Marianna Ascierto, Annalisa Chianese, Francesco Foglia, Emiliana Finamore, Luciana Petrullo, Carla Zannella, Anna De Filippis, Maria Grazia Coppola and Massimiliano Galdiero
Pathogens 2025, 14(5), 425; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14050425 - 27 Apr 2025
Viewed by 942
Abstract
Background. Blastocystis spp. is a common protozoan found in the gastrointestinal tract, typically existing as a non-pathogenic organism in humans and other animals. However, it can become pathogenic when the immune system is compromised due to bacterial, viral, fungal, or other parasitic infections, [...] Read more.
Background. Blastocystis spp. is a common protozoan found in the gastrointestinal tract, typically existing as a non-pathogenic organism in humans and other animals. However, it can become pathogenic when the immune system is compromised due to bacterial, viral, fungal, or other parasitic infections, as well as systemic conditions, leading to symptomatic blastocystosis. Methods. Fecal samples were collected from patients at the University Hospital of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” and Cotugno Hospital in Naples. Among these samples, those that tested positive for Blastocystis spp. and were associated with other microbial infections were further analyzed. Bacterial co-infections were identified using immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Viral infections were detected using chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), while fungal infections were diagnosed through microscopic examination and molecular biology techniques. Additionally, co-infections with other parasites were identified through microscopic analysis after Ridley’s concentration and Giemsa staining (O&P). Results. Out of the 2050 stool samples collected, 121 were positive for Blastocystis spp., of which 75 were associated with other infections. We identified the vacuolar form in patients co-infected with bacteria (n = 22), viruses (n = 30), fungi (n = 3), and other parasites (n = 20). Conclusions. Our findings indicated a higher incidence of the vacuolar form of Blastocystis spp. in symptomatic and immunocompromised patients, suggesting that a weakened immune system may increase the risk of contracting Blastocystis and other microbial infections. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2309 KiB  
Article
Performance Evaluation of the New High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Immunoassay on CL-2600i Mindray Analyzer
by Flaminia Tomassetti, Denise Fiorelli, Edoardo Cappa, Alfredo Giovannelli, Martina Pelagalli, Silvia Velocci, Eleonora Nicolai, Marilena Minieri, Marco Alfonso Perrone, Sergio Bernardini and Massimo Pieri
Diagnostics 2025, 15(8), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15081031 - 18 Apr 2025
Viewed by 822
Abstract
Background: International guidelines recommend the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) I and T methods for the detection of myocardial injury as a pre-requisite for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients admitted to the emergency department. Recently, Mindray (Mindray [...] Read more.
Background: International guidelines recommend the use of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) I and T methods for the detection of myocardial injury as a pre-requisite for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients admitted to the emergency department. Recently, Mindray (Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) has introduced a new chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) for the detection of the cTn complex. The present study aims to verify and validate the hs-cTnI Mindray assay on the new automated CL2600i analyzer compared to the routine Alinity-i series instrument by Abbott (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA). Methods: This study evaluated linearity, precision through the 5 × 5 protocol, methodological comparison on plasma and serum matrices, hs-cTnI 99th percentile imprecision, and the hs-cTnI detection rate in a healthy population. Results: The results obtained proved that the performance of the Mindray hs-cTnI test on the CL2600i platform was closely comparable to the Abbott Alinity-i system (plasma R2: 0.974; serum R2: 0.995). The CVs were consistently low, and no significant differences were reported. Excellent analytical performance, with high sensitivity, was also observed in the healthy population (overall detection rate: 79%), as well as good linearity within the measuring range (R2: 0.994). Conclusions: The Mindray hs-cTnI test confirms its robustness and utility in routine practice as an advanced assay. The new technology, with more sensitive detection methods, may improve the accuracy and reliability of cardiac biomarker testing, ultimately leading to better outcomes in the management of patients with AMI and other cardiac conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Laboratory Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1354 KiB  
Article
Discrepancy in SARS-CoV-2 Infection Status Among PCR, Serological, and Cellular Immunity Assays of Nucleocapsids: A Historical Cohort Study
by Taiga Uchiyama, Yurie Kobashi, Takeshi Kawamura, Yoshitaka Nishikawa, Aya Nakayama, Fumiya Oguro, Yudai Kaneko, Chika Yamamoto, Naomi Ito, Tianchen Zhao, Hiroaki Saito, Toshiki Abe, Tatsuhiko Kodama and Masaharu Tsubokura
Vaccines 2025, 13(3), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13030259 - 28 Feb 2025
Viewed by 845
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Limited research has compared tests assessing humoral and cellular immunity related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study evaluated immunoglobulin G for nucleocapsid (IgG(N)) and T-spot for nucleocapsid (T-spot(N)) assays against polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results for identifying infected individuals. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Limited research has compared tests assessing humoral and cellular immunity related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study evaluated immunoglobulin G for nucleocapsid (IgG(N)) and T-spot for nucleocapsid (T-spot(N)) assays against polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test results for identifying infected individuals. Methods: This study included participants who had completed five blood samplings since their second COVID-19 vaccination between 9 September 2021 and 6 November 2022. Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) tests measured the humoral immune response, IgG(S) and neutralizing activity tests the immune status, and IgG(N) tests the infection history. For cellar immunity, T-spot(S) indicated immune status, and T-spot(N) indicated infection history. Results: The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals who tested positive for PCR and the proportion who tested positive for IgG(N) and T-spot(N). Overall, this study included 2104 participants. In the PCR-negative group, 1838 individuals tested negative for IgG(N), whereas 64 tested positive at least once. The geometric mean of IgG(S) at T5 was 1541.7 AU/mL in the IgG(N)-negative group and 3965.8 AU/mL in the IgG(N)-positive group, which was 2.6 times higher. In the PCR-positive group, 25 individuals tested negative for IgG(N), while 177 tested positive at least once. The geometric mean of IgG(S) at T5 was 2700.6 AU/mL in the IgG(N)-negative group and 5400.8 AU/mL in the IgG(N)-positive group, showing higher values in the IgG(N)-positive group. Conclusions: A discrepancy was noted between PCR test results and the IgG(N) and T-spot(N) determinations. Combining multiple assays is required to accurately identify the past-infected population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3275 KiB  
Article
Optimizing Magnetic Separation and Cleaning Module in Fully Automated Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Analyzer Using a Special Arrangement of Spliced Magnets and a Three-Stage Magnetic Bead Collection Method
by Chuan Lyu, Yu Jiang, Zhen Dai, Xu Xu, Yu Cai, Bo Liang, Congcong Zhou, Xuesong Ye and Jing Wang
Magnetochemistry 2024, 10(10), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry10100075 - 30 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1689
Abstract
The magnetic separation and cleaning module, as a core component of the fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) analyzer, encounters issues including high magnetic bead loss rate, long cleaning time, and poor cleaning effect. Based on a simulation analysis using COMSOL, we proposed a [...] Read more.
The magnetic separation and cleaning module, as a core component of the fully automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) analyzer, encounters issues including high magnetic bead loss rate, long cleaning time, and poor cleaning effect. Based on a simulation analysis using COMSOL, we proposed a novel magnetic separation and cleaning module applied to a fully automated CLIA analyzer. The module adopted a method of arranging spliced rectangular magnets on opposite sides, where the same polarity faced each other, as well as a three-stage magnetic bead collection method. With the proposed method, the total cleaning process can be accomplished within 225 s; the total magnetic bead loss rate over three rounds of cleaning is 6.03%, whereas that of traditional instruments is 25.85%; the coefficient of variation (CV) of the magnetic bead loss rate is less than 0.5%; effective cleaning of free markers is achieved under various sample conditions. Compared with traditional CLIA instruments, this method comprehensively improves key performance indicators of the magnetic separation and cleaning module, providing a reference for similar modules in fully automated CLIA analyzers and positively impacting the accuracy of CLIA for the detection of disease biomarkers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Applications of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1876 KiB  
Article
Chemiluminescence Immunoassay for Sensitive Detection of C-reactive Protein Using Graphene Oxide–Gold Nanoparticle–Luminol Hybrids as Enhanced Luminogenic Molecules
by Kyung Mi Kim, Phuong Thy Nguyen, Jeemin Kim, Seung Hoo Song, Jin Woo Park and Moon Il Kim
Chemosensors 2024, 12(9), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors12090193 - 20 Sep 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2317
Abstract
This study presents the development of luminol and gold nanoparticle co-functionalized graphene oxide (GO-AuNPs-L) hybrids as enhanced luminogenic signaling molecules in the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) for detecting C-reactive protein (CRP), a key biomarker of inflammation and cardiovascular diseases. When compared to free luminol, [...] Read more.
This study presents the development of luminol and gold nanoparticle co-functionalized graphene oxide (GO-AuNPs-L) hybrids as enhanced luminogenic signaling molecules in the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) for detecting C-reactive protein (CRP), a key biomarker of inflammation and cardiovascular diseases. When compared to free luminol, the GO-AuNPs-L hybrids significantly increased and prolonged the CL signal based on their synergistic enhancement in electron transfer during CL production. Based on the performance, the hybrids were employed as signaling molecules in both well plate-based and lateral flow CLIA platforms, showing substantial improvements in signal intensity and sensitivity in CRP detection. These results highlight the potential of GO-AuNPs-L hybrids as versatile and highly sensitive luminogenic molecules for immunological CRP detection, offering promising applications in clinical laboratory settings as well as in point-of-care diagnostics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rapid Point-of-Care Testing Technology and Application)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1251 KiB  
Review
The Evolution of Serological Assays during Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic: From an Easy-to-Use Screening Tool for Identifying Current Infections to Laboratory Algorithms for Discovering Immune Protection and Optimizing Vaccine Administration
by Eleonora Nicolai, Flaminia Tomassetti, Stefano Pignalosa, Serena Redi, Mariapaola Marino, Umberto Basile and Marco Ciotti
COVID 2024, 4(8), 1272-1290; https://doi.org/10.3390/covid4080091 - 16 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1699
Abstract
The emergence of COVID-19 has evolved into a global pandemic, causing an unprecedented public health crisis marked by unprecedented levels of morbidity never seen in the recent past. Considerable research efforts have been made in the scientific community to establish an optimal method [...] Read more.
The emergence of COVID-19 has evolved into a global pandemic, causing an unprecedented public health crisis marked by unprecedented levels of morbidity never seen in the recent past. Considerable research efforts have been made in the scientific community to establish an optimal method to identify severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections and to understand the induced immune response. This review examined the development of serological tests during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering the factors affecting sensitivity and specificity, which are key to promote an efficient vaccination strategy for public health. The market has witnessed the introduction of various serological tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), which emerged as a powerful and rapid tool to monitor the antibody response before and after vaccination or infection. Therefore, developing serological tests by studying antibody trends and persistence is essential for creating long-term strategies. Our analysis underscores the multifaceted applications of serological tests in pandemic management with a focus on the critical insights they provide into antibody dynamics that help in managing the ongoing pandemic and shaping future public health initiatives, providing a basis for optimizing the future response to viral threats. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 602 KiB  
Article
The Protection Level of S-RBD SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin G Antibodies Using the Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Compared to the Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test Method
by Agnes Rengga Indrati, Erinca Horian, Nina Susana Dewi, Nida Suraya, Marita Restie Tiara, Hofiya Djauhari and Bachti Alisjahbana
Diagnostics 2024, 14(16), 1776; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14161776 - 14 Aug 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1579
Abstract
COVID-19 infection in high-risk populations is fatal and has a poor prognosis, necessitating a test to determine the protectiveness of immune response. Antibody testing is necessary to determine the body’s immune response to COVID-19 infection and also vaccination strategies. Among the various methods [...] Read more.
COVID-19 infection in high-risk populations is fatal and has a poor prognosis, necessitating a test to determine the protectiveness of immune response. Antibody testing is necessary to determine the body’s immune response to COVID-19 infection and also vaccination strategies. Among the various methods available, the chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) test is more widely used and accessible to determine antibody levels. This study aimed to determine the protection level of S-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG using CLIA compared to the Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (SVNT). The population of this study comprised all healthcare professionals who experienced S-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level examinations. S-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels were examined using CLIA and SVNT. The cut-off was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) measurements were evaluated. The result showed a strong positive correlation between S-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG CLIA and SVNT, with a value of r = 0.933 and p < 0.001. The value ≥ 37.29 BAU/mL was determined as the cut-off based on SVNT 30% inhibition level with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 96.5%, 90.9%, 96.5%, and 90.9%, respectively. A titer of antibodies greater than or equal to 37.29 BAU/mL with CLIA showed the presence of protective antibodies compared to SVNT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 801 KiB  
Article
A Comparative Evaluation of Three Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of Human Monkeypox
by Jing Qu, Xiaomin Zhang, Kun Liu, You Li, Ting Wang, Zhonggang Fang, Cheng Chen, Xiao Tan, Ying Lin, Qing Xu, Yan Yang, Wanqing Wang, Manyu Huang, Shiliang Guo, Ziqiu Chen, Wei Rao, Xiaolu Shi and Bo Peng
Viruses 2024, 16(8), 1286; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16081286 - 12 Aug 2024
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3299
Abstract
Accurate and early diagnosis of monkeypox virus (MPXV) is crucial for controlling epidemics and treating affected individuals promptly. This study aimed to assess the analytical and clinical performance of the MolecisionTM Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay, Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay, and MAGLUMI [...] Read more.
Accurate and early diagnosis of monkeypox virus (MPXV) is crucial for controlling epidemics and treating affected individuals promptly. This study aimed to assess the analytical and clinical performance of the MolecisionTM Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay, Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay, and MAGLUMI® Monkeypox Virus Ag (chemiluminescence immunoassay, CLIA) Assay. Additionally, it aimed to compare the clinical application of antigen and nucleic acid assays to offer insights into using commercial monkeypox assay kits. Specimens from 117 clinical patients, serial diluted virus cell culture supernatant, and artificially created positive samples were tested to evaluate the performance of these assay kits for MPXV diagnostics. The Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay had a limit of detection (LoD) of 3.89 CCID50/mL, while the MolecisionTM Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay had an LoD of 15.55 CCID50/mL. The MAGLUMI® Monkeypox Virus Ag (CLIA) Assay had an LoD of 0.500 pg/mL. The accuracy of the MolecisionTM Monkeypox Virus qPCR Assay was comparable to the Biorain Monkeypox Virus ddPCR Assay, and the MAGLUMI® Monkeypox Virus Ag (CLIA) Assay demonstrated high sensitivity. The specificity of all three MPXV diagnostic assays for clinical specimens with potential cross-reacting substances was 100%. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the clinical application of monkeypox assays, supporting efforts to mitigate and control the spread of monkeypox. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Human Monkeypox Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 1466 KiB  
Article
Diagnostic Accuracy of Aldosterone and Renin Measurement by Chemiluminescence for Screening of Patients with Primary Aldosteronism
by Martina Tetti, Jacopo Burrello, Jessica Goi, Mirko Parasiliti-Caprino, Giulia Gioiello, Fabio Settanni, Silvia Monticone, Paolo Mulatero and Giulio Mengozzi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(15), 8453; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158453 - 2 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1631
Abstract
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of endocrine arterial hypertension, and the suggested screening test for case detection is the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) or aldosterone-to-direct renin ratio (ADRR) based on radio-immunoassay (RIA) and chemiluminescence assay (CLIA), respectively. The objective of our [...] Read more.
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of endocrine arterial hypertension, and the suggested screening test for case detection is the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) or aldosterone-to-direct renin ratio (ADRR) based on radio-immunoassay (RIA) and chemiluminescence assay (CLIA), respectively. The objective of our study was to evaluate the reliability of CLIA for aldosterone and renin measurement and the diagnostic performance of ADRR. A prospective cohort of 1110 patients referred to a single laboratory medicine center underwent measurement of aldosterone and direct renin concentration (DRC) by CLIA and measurement of aldosterone and plasma renin activity (PRA) by RIA. Of 1110 patients, 640 obtained a final diagnosis of hypertension, and 90 of these patients were diagnosed with PA. Overall, between-method correlation was highly significant for aldosterone concentrations (R = 0.945, p < 0.001) and less strong but significant for DRC/PRA (R = 0.422, p < 0.001). Among hypertensive patients, in PA cases, the areas under the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were 0.928 (95% confidence interval 0.904–0.954) for ADRR and 0.943 (95% confidence interval 0.920–0.966) for ARR and were comparable and not significantly different. The highest accuracy was obtained with an ADRR cut-off of 25 (ng/L)/(mIU/L), displaying a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 85%. The chemiluminescence assay for aldosterone and DRC is a reliable method for PA diagnosis compared to the classical RIA method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Renin-Angiotensin System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1175 KiB  
Article
Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing in a Maximum Care Hospital: Method-Dependent Differences
by Marija Kocijancic, Thomas Goj, Andreas Peter, Reinhild Klein and Sebastian Hörber
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4528; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154528 - 2 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1670
Abstract
Background: Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) testing is critical for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria recommend the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and specific thresholds for aPL positivity. Since non-ELISA methods are increasingly used, we compared and evaluated ELISA [...] Read more.
Background: Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) testing is critical for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria recommend the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and specific thresholds for aPL positivity. Since non-ELISA methods are increasingly used, we compared and evaluated ELISA and non-ELISA aPL assays in a real-world maximum care hospital setting. Methods: Between January 2021 and June 2024, anticardiolipin (aCL; IgG and IgM) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (aß2GPI; IgG and IgM) antibodies were measured using ELISA (n = 5115) and a chemiluminescence-based automated immunoassay (CLIA) (n = 3820). Results of parallel testing were compared, and associations with clinical and laboratory characteristics were evaluated. Results: A total of 946 samples were tested using ELISA and CLIA in parallel. A total of 136 (14%) specimens were positive for at least one aPL, and 55 (6%) specimens were from patients diagnosed with APS. Among the latter, 47 (85%) and 41 (75%) patients were positive when ELISA- or CLIA-based aPL assays were used, respectively. After applying the >40 units threshold of the new classification criteria, the number of aPL-positive specimens was significantly lower. In the entire cohort, the agreement between ELISA and CLIA aPL assays was acceptable only for aß2GPI IgG; the results from the two methods did not agree for aCL IgG/IgM and aß2GPI IgM. In APS patients, the agreement between ELISA and CLIA aPL assays was acceptable for aß2GPI IgG and IgM but poor for aCL IgG and IgM. Antibody levels in APS patients were significantly higher using CLIA compared to ELISA. Conclusions: The method-dependent discrepancies between ELISA- and CLIA-based aPL assays regarding the quantitative and qualitative results are substantial. Both methods are suitable for APS classification, but the choice of aPL assay may influence the classification, and therefore, aPL results should be interpreted carefully in the clinical context. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody-Mediated Thrombotic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3294 KiB  
Systematic Review
Diagnostic Accuracy of IgA Anti-Transglutaminase Assessed by Chemiluminescence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Dorina Pjetraj, Alfredo Pulvirenti, Marco Moretti, Simona Gatti, Giulia Naspi Catassi, Carlo Catassi and Elena Lionetti
Nutrients 2024, 16(15), 2427; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152427 - 26 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2654
Abstract
A new chemiluminescence immunoassay method (CLIA) for detecting IgA anti-transglutaminase (atTG IgA) in celiac disease (CD) has prompted inquiries into its diagnostic performance. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CLIA with traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA). [...] Read more.
A new chemiluminescence immunoassay method (CLIA) for detecting IgA anti-transglutaminase (atTG IgA) in celiac disease (CD) has prompted inquiries into its diagnostic performance. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CLIA with traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (FEIA). We searched PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases up to March 2024. The diagnostic references were intestinal biopsy and ESPGHAN guidelines. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of atTG IgA assessed by CLIA and the odds ratio (OR) between the assays. Eleven articles were eligible for the systematic review and seven for the meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of atTG IgA CLIA-assay were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95–0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94–0.99), respectively. The sensitivity of atTG IgA antibody detection did not significantly vary across the three assay modalities examined (CLIA vs. ELISA OR: 1.08 (95% CI, 0.56–2.11; p = 0.8); CLIA vs. FEIA OR: 6.97 (95% CI, 0.60–81.03; p = 0.1). The specificity of atTG IgA assessed by FEIA was higher than for CLIA (OR 0.17 (95% CI, 0.05–0.62); p < 0.007). According to the systematic review, normalization of atTG IgA levels in CD patients following a gluten-free diet was delayed when using CLIA compared to ELISA and FEIA methods. Conflicting findings were reported on the antibody threshold to use in order to avoid biopsy confirmation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4380 KiB  
Review
Advancing Microfluidic Immunity Testing Systems: New Trends for Microbial Pathogen Detection
by Yiran Wang, Jingwei Chen, Yule Zhang, Zhijin Yang, Kaihuan Zhang, Dawei Zhang and Lulu Zheng
Molecules 2024, 29(14), 3322; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143322 - 15 Jul 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5143
Abstract
Pathogenic microorganisms play a crucial role in the global disease burden due to their ability to cause various diseases and spread through multiple transmission routes. Immunity tests identify antigens related to these pathogens, thereby confirming past infections and monitoring the host’s immune response. [...] Read more.
Pathogenic microorganisms play a crucial role in the global disease burden due to their ability to cause various diseases and spread through multiple transmission routes. Immunity tests identify antigens related to these pathogens, thereby confirming past infections and monitoring the host’s immune response. Traditional pathogen detection methods, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs), are often labor-intensive, slow, and reliant on sophisticated equipment and skilled personnel, which can be limiting in resource-poor settings. In contrast, the development of microfluidic technologies presents a promising alternative, offering automation, miniaturization, and cost efficiency. These advanced methods are poised to replace traditional assays by streamlining processes and enabling rapid, high-throughput immunity testing for pathogens. This review highlights the latest advancements in microfluidic systems designed for rapid and high-throughput immunity testing, incorporating immunosensors, single molecule arrays (Simoas), a lateral flow assay (LFA), and smartphone integration. It focuses on key pathogenic microorganisms such as SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and the ZIKA virus (ZIKV). Additionally, the review discusses the challenges, commercialization prospects, and future directions to advance microfluidic systems for infectious disease detection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop