Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (263)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = carcinomatosis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 1100 KiB  
Review
The Role of Prophylactic HIPEC in High-Risk Gastric Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?
by Alexandros Diamantis, Athina A. Samara, Anastasios Lafioniatis, Michel B. Janho, Theodoros Floros and Konstantinos Tepetes
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2492; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152492 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 286
Abstract
For patients diagnosed with a malignancy at high risk of developing peritoneal metastases, the concept of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has emerged. The aim of the present study is to assess the role of prophylactic HIPEC in gastric cancer patients at high [...] Read more.
For patients diagnosed with a malignancy at high risk of developing peritoneal metastases, the concept of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has emerged. The aim of the present study is to assess the role of prophylactic HIPEC in gastric cancer patients at high risk of PC, based on the currently available data in the literature. In total, 14 RCTs and 16 non-RCTs were identified and included in the present review, with 1383 patients included in the RCTs (627 of whom underwent HIPEC) and 1647 patients included in the non-RCTs (with 609 undergoing HIPEC). Prophylactic HIPEC appears to be useful and effective in treating patients with high-risk gastric cancer, improving both overall and disease-free survival. The heterogeneity of data regarding treatment protocols and complication rates suggests that further research is necessary to develop optimal therapeutic approaches and personalized treatment options; in particular, large-scale randomized control trials are needed in order to elucidate the potential benefits associated with the use of prophylactic HIPEC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Treatment of Abdominal Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1088 KiB  
Article
Management and Outcomes of Urinary Tract Involvement in Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC): A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Feza Karakayali, Melik Kagan Aktas, Erman Aytac, Ugur Sungurtekin, Sezai Demirbas, Mustafa Oncel, Ersin Ozturk, Tahsin Colak, Mehmet Ince, Mustafa Haksal, Safak Coskun and Selman Sokmen
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1331; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081331 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 235
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The combined use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is employed for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). To achieve optimal cytoreduction, there may be a need for extensive resection and subsequent reconstruction of urologic structures. [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The combined use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is employed for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). To achieve optimal cytoreduction, there may be a need for extensive resection and subsequent reconstruction of urologic structures. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of urinary tract resection or repair performed in CRS/HIPEC in terms of operative and oncological outcomes. Materials and Methods: After institutional review board approval, data from 550 consecutive patients who underwent the CRS/HIPEC procedure from January 2007 to July 2018 at six university hospitals was retrieved from prospectively maintained databases. Data from patients who had a concomitant curative resection and reconstruction of the bladder, ureter, or kidney during the CRS/HIPEC procedure were analyzed retrospectively. Results: A total of 50 out of 550 patients had undergone resection with a repair of the urinary tract due to tumor invasion or iatrogenic injury. Postoperative (within 30 days) urologic complications were observed in 9 of the 50 patients. It was found that having a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) equal to or greater than 20 (p < 0.009) was the sole significant risk factor associated with the occurrence of early urinary complications. Survival time post CRS/HIPEC treatment did not significantly differ between patients with and without urologic complications (median overall survival: 23 vs. 27 months, p = 0.683). Conclusions: Despite urinary tract issues during CRS/HIPEC for PC, including a PCI over 20 and potential complications from resection or repair, the procedure still offers significant survival benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1778 KiB  
Article
PET/CT Volumetric Parameters as Predictors of the Peritoneal Cancer Index in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients
by Ariel Glickman, Blanca Gil-Ibáñez, Aida Niñerola-Baizán, Marta Tormo, Núria Carreras-Dieguez, Pere Fusté, Marta Del Pino, Eduardo González-Bosquet, Inmaculada Romero-Zayas, Cristina Celada-Castro, Tiermes Marina, Lydia Gaba, Adela Rodriguez Hernández, Adela Saco, Laura Buñesch, Josep Lluís Carrasco, Katherine Quintero, David Fuster, Berta Díaz-Feijóo, Aureli Torné and Pilar Paredesadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Diagnostics 2025, 15(14), 1818; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15141818 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 379
Abstract
Background: Assessment of the peritoneal cancer burden is crucial for determining the optimal treatment in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). Effective non-invasive methods to predict tumour load remain limited. This study aimed to assess the applicability of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters, metabolic [...] Read more.
Background: Assessment of the peritoneal cancer burden is crucial for determining the optimal treatment in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). Effective non-invasive methods to predict tumour load remain limited. This study aimed to assess the applicability of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters, metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) for predicting the surgical peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in AOC before primary treatment. Methods: Patients with high-grade serous or undifferentiated AOC who underwent surgical PCI evaluation and 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT between 01/2013 and 12/2018 were included. MTV and TLG were calculated using thresholds of 40% and 50% (MTV40, MTV50, TLG40, and TLG50). Correlations between the peritoneal carcinomatosis MTV (car_MTV) and TLG (car_TLG) were analysed. The capacity of volumetric parameters to estimate PCIs above or below 14 and 20 was assessed for the whole abdominal cavity and in per-quadrant analysis, specifically for upper-abdomen areas 1, 2, and 3 (MTV40_1, 2, 3 and TLG40_1, 2, 3). Results: MTV40, MTV50, TLG40, and TLG50 significantly correlated with the PCI in the final study population (n = 45). MTV40 showed a Pearson coefficient of 0.41 (p = 0.003). MTV3_40 (AUC 0.79) and TLG3_40 (AUC 0.81) presented the highest AUCs for predicting a PCI above or below 14. The volumetric parameters allowed the prediction of a PCI greater or less than 20, with an AUC of 0.77 for MTV40_1 and 0.78 for TLG40_1. Conclusions: 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT MTV and TLG correlate significantly with the surgical PCI when assessing peritoneal carcinomatosis or quadrant-specific disease. This approach offers a reliable non-invasive method for evaluating tumour burden in AOC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring Gynecological Pathology and Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 748 KiB  
Article
Evaluating the Long-Term Impact of Cytoreductive Surgery for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: Are We on the Right Path?
by Cecilia Orsini, Matteo Aulicino, Giorgio D’Annibale, Marianna Cantelmo, Sara Totaro Aprile, Paolo Catania, Lorenzo Barberis, Federica Ferracci, Miriam Attalla El Halabieh, Carlo Abatini, Claudio Lodoli, Andrea Di Giorgio, Antonia Strippoli, Fabio Pacelli and Francesco Santullo
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(7), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15070300 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 376
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer (GCPM) represent a significant clinical challenge in terms of therapeutic options and prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has demonstrated promising survival benefits within a multimodal approach, particularly in carefully selected patients. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: Peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer (GCPM) represent a significant clinical challenge in terms of therapeutic options and prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has demonstrated promising survival benefits within a multimodal approach, particularly in carefully selected patients. Methods: This retrospective single-center study evaluated outcomes in patients with synchronous GCPM treated with CRS + HIPEC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and identification of prognostic factors associated with poor outcomes. Additionally, we sought to characterize patients achieving long-term survival (OS ≥ 24 months). Results: The median OS and DFS were 18 and 13 months, respectively. A peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≥ 7 and major postoperative complications were independently associated with reduced survival. Recurrence was significantly linked to PCI ≥ 7 and signet ring cell histology. Stratification by survival outcome identified PCI ≥ 7 as the only statistically significant variable differentiating average- and long-survival groups. Moreover, elevated PCI was independently associated with a higher incidence of major postoperative complications. Conclusions: CRS + HIPEC may offer a survival advantage over the use of systemic therapy exclusively in appropriately selected patients, particularly those with limited peritoneal disease burden. These results underscore the importance of accurate patient selection to balance surgical risks and maximize oncological benefits in the treatment of GCPM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Therapeutic Strategies in Gastrointestinal Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 2907 KiB  
Review
High-Grade Appendiceal Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma—A Literature Review Starting from a Rare Case
by Mircea Gheorghe, Rodica Daniela Birla, Anca Evsei-Seceleanu, Luiza Bitina, Ioan Nicolae Mates and Dragos Valentin Predescu
Life 2025, 15(7), 1047; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15071047 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 524
Abstract
Goblet cell adenocarcinomas (GCAs) are an exceedingly rare subtype of tumors, almost exclusively occurring in the appendix, and characterized by features overlapping both adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which has historically led to confusion and varied nomenclature. This study presents a comprehensive review [...] Read more.
Goblet cell adenocarcinomas (GCAs) are an exceedingly rare subtype of tumors, almost exclusively occurring in the appendix, and characterized by features overlapping both adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which has historically led to confusion and varied nomenclature. This study presents a comprehensive review of the literature highlighting particularities of this type of malignancy, starting from a rare case of a 54-year-old female operated on in our clinic for an appendiceal tumor, initially suspected to be a mucinous neoplasm based on colonoscopic biopsy, which was ultimately confirmed to be goblet cell adenocarcinoma on both intraoperative frozen section and definitive pathological examination. Exhibiting signs and symptoms associated with an abdominal mass, she underwent a right hemicolectomy with partial omentectomy for locally advanced, high-grade, invasive goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix with lymphatic macro metastases and epiploic invasion, categorized as AJCC stage IVb carcinomatosis. The patient received FOLFOX adjuvant. Six months later, she required reoperation due to the progression of carcinomatosis, which was again confirmed histopathologically. A second-line oncological protocol comprising irinotecan, capecitabine, and bevacizumab was initiated. Given the rarity of GCAs and the absence of a consensus on nomenclature, classification, and diagnostic criteria, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to highlight current trends related to this entity, including its classification within different systems (Tang, Yozu, WHO, AJCC), as well as the therapeutic surgical approaches—ranging from simple appendectomy to extensive multiorgan resection, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and the use of systemic therapy. Adhering to these recommendations will enhance communication among pathologists, surgeons, and oncologists regarding the natural history and prognosis of this rare malignancy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatments of Intestinal Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 294 KiB  
Review
The Role of [18F]FDG PET Imaging for the Assessment of Pulmonary Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis: A Comprehensive Narrative Literature Review
by Francesco Dondi, Pietro Bellini, Michela Cossandi, Luca Camoni, Roberto Rinaldi, Gian Luca Viganò and Francesco Bertagna
Diagnostics 2025, 15(13), 1626; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131626 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 453
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (PLC) is a rare, aggressive manifestation of metastatic cancer characterized by lymphatic infiltration of the lungs, typically indicating advanced disease and poor prognosis. Methods: This comprehensive narrative review evaluates the role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Pulmonary lymphangitic carcinomatosis (PLC) is a rare, aggressive manifestation of metastatic cancer characterized by lymphatic infiltration of the lungs, typically indicating advanced disease and poor prognosis. Methods: This comprehensive narrative review evaluates the role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in assessing PLC. Results: Current evidence demonstrates that [18F]FDG PET/CT achieves high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 86 to 97% and 84 to 100%, respectively, particularly when employing semiquantitative metrics such as peritumoral standardized uptake value (SUVmax) thresholds (e.g., ≥2.1). PET/CT surpasses high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in distinguishing PLC from mimics like pulmonary sarcoidosis by identifying distinct metabolic patterns: bronchovascular hypermetabolism in PLC versus subpleural nodular uptake in sarcoidosis. Prognostically, metabolic tumor burden (e.g., SUVmax × involved lobes) and novel cPLC classifications (localized to the ipsilateral or contralateral lung) independently predict progression-free survival. However, challenges persist, including non-specific tracer uptake in inflammatory conditions and variability in SUV measurements due to technical factors. Emerging digital PET/CT systems, with enhanced spatial resolution, may improve the detection of focal PLC and reduce false negatives. While [18F]FDG PET/CT is invaluable for whole-body staging, therapeutic monitoring and biopsy guidance, the standardization of protocols and multicenter validation of prognostic models are critical for clinical integration. Future research should explore novel tracers (e.g., PSMA for prostate cancer-related PLC) and machine learning approaches to refine diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Conclusions: This review underscores the role and the transformative potential of [18F]FDG PET/CT in PLC management while advocating for rigorous standardization to maximize its clinical utility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Radiomics in Medical Imaging)
7 pages, 686 KiB  
Case Report
Treatment of Leptomeningeal Disease with Tepotinib in a Patient with Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation Presenting with Extensive Metastasis Involving Duodenum
by Jacquelyn Shugarts, Aida Amado, Taylor Praska, Monica Camou and Jiaxin Niu
Reports 2025, 8(2), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8020096 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 523
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: The mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) is a rare genetic alteration occurring in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the approved treatment for first-line therapy in a metastatic setting. However, the unusual [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: The mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) is a rare genetic alteration occurring in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the approved treatment for first-line therapy in a metastatic setting. However, the unusual presentation of gastrointestinal metastasis and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMD) poses significant treatment challenges. Case Presentation: Here we report a case of a 72-year-old male with metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC, presenting with brain and duodenal metastases. Conclusions: The patient responded exceptionally well to first-line chemoimmunotherapy, achieving clinically complete remission for 2 years. He subsequently developed cerebellar metastasis and leptomeningeal disease (LMD) but demonstrated a remarkable response to tepotinib and continued to enjoy radiographic complete remission over 2.5 years at the time of this report. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1481 KiB  
Article
Mucin4 (MUC4) Antibody Labeled with an NIR Dye Brightly Targets Pancreatic Cancer Liver Metastases and Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
by Sunidhi Jaiswal, Siamak Amirfakhri, Javier Bravo, Keita Kobayashi, Abhijit Aithal, Sumbal Talib, Kavita Mallya, Maneesh Jain, Aaron M. Mohs, Robert M. Hoffman, Surinder K. Batra and Michael Bouvet
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 2031; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122031 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 540
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of deaths related to cancer. It is a highly aggressive malignancy and often metastasizes quickly to other parts of the body and organs. The most effective cure is surgical resection, which also is limited by [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of deaths related to cancer. It is a highly aggressive malignancy and often metastasizes quickly to other parts of the body and organs. The most effective cure is surgical resection, which also is limited by tumor identification and clear tumor margin visualization. Previously, we used MUC4 antibodies labeled with IRDye800CW (anti-MUC4-IR800) to target primary human pancreatic cancer in orthotopic cell line mouse models. Methods: In the present study, we established a pancreatic cancer liver metastasis mouse model by implanting a tumor fragment in the liver and a peritoneal carcinomatosis mouse model by injecting pancreatic cancer cells interperitoneally. Once the tumors were established, anti-MUC4-IR800 was administered to the mice by tail vein injection. Laparotomy was performed and tumors were imaged under white-light and near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence with the Pearl Small Animal Imaging System. Results: NIR imaging after 72 h shows the bright targeting of pancreatic cancer metastasis in both mouse models with high tumor-to-background ratios. Conclusions: Anti-MUC4-IR800 was able to successfully target and brightly label metastatic pancreatic cancer as small as 1 mm. Future clinical applications of the results of the present study are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enhancing Cancer Treatments through Fluorescence-Guided Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1196 KiB  
Article
Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Metastases from Primary Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers: An Observational Study
by Andrew M. Fleming, Owen M. Clark, Jaewon J. Lee, Kristen Dougherty, Leah E. Hendrick, Jordan Raine, Ian Solsky, Paxton V. Dickson, Evan S. Glazer, David Shibata, Elizabeth Gleeson, Gitonga Munene and Jeremiah L. Deneve
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 2014; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122014 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 382
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a single institution database to assess perioperative outcomes after [...] Read more.
Background: Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a single institution database to assess perioperative outcomes after repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal (pAC) and colorectal (pCRC) cancers. Kaplan–Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. Results: Of 157 patients, 103 patients underwent initial CRS/HIPEC for pAC (n = 67) or pCRC (n = 36) histologies. Twenty-seven pAC patients (27/67, 40%) and 23/36 pCRC patients (63%) developed disease recurrence. Relapsed patients had a higher burden of disease (PCI), operative length and blood loss and received adjuvant chemotherapy (all p < 0.05). Nine of the 27 relapsed pAC patients and 5 of the 13 relapsed pCRC patients underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC. The median time to repeat CRS/HIPEC was 18 months (4–26 months), and a CCR-0 and CCR-1 were achieved in 79% and 21%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS for pAC patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC was 88.9%, 88.9% and 77.8%, and the 1- and 3-year OS for pCRC patients was 100% and 25%, respectively. Repeat CRS/HIPEC for pAC was associated with significant improvement in OS (p = 0.03), while for pCRC, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.99). Conclusions: Repeat CRS/HIPEC for isolated peritoneal recurrence is safe and offers the potential for long-term survival. Patient selection is key to ensure optimal cytoreduction when considering repeat CRS/HIPEC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 323 KiB  
Article
Combined Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Normothermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Long-Term After Interval Cytoreduction in Ovarian Cancer: A Phase I Clinical Trial (BICOV1)
by Alida González-Gil, Elena Gil-Gómez, Vicente Olivares-Ripoll, Álvaro Cerezuela Fernández de Palencia, Jerónimo Martínez-García, Domingo Sánchez-Martínez, Alberto Rafael Guijarro-Campillo and Pedro Antonio Cascales-Campos
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 1957; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17121957 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 631
Abstract
Backgroud: Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy, with most patients presenting with peritoneal dissemination at diagnosis. Complete cytoreduction and sensitivity to platinum-based systemic chemotherapy remain the most significant prognostic factors. However, even after optimal first-line management, over half of patients relapse due [...] Read more.
Backgroud: Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy, with most patients presenting with peritoneal dissemination at diagnosis. Complete cytoreduction and sensitivity to platinum-based systemic chemotherapy remain the most significant prognostic factors. However, even after optimal first-line management, over half of patients relapse due to residual microscopic disease. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy aims to target this component, with normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy long-term (NIPEC-LT) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) being the most studied approaches. While NIPEC-LT has demonstrated improved survival in select trials, concerns regarding toxicity and catheter-related complications have limited its adoption as standard care. Conversely, HIPEC has shown survival benefits, particularly in patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery (iCRS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, leading to its inclusion in clinical guidelines. However, HIPEC is administered as a single intraoperative treatment, limiting its prolonged effect. Objectives and Method: This study investigates the combination of HIPEC and postoperative NIPEC-LT in the BICOV-1 trial, a prospective, non-randomized phase I study evaluating the feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes. The primary objective is to assess the treatment completion rates and morbidity. The secondary endpoints include disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and quality-of-life measures. Combining HIPEC and NIPEC-LT is a rational approach, as both have shown independent benefits and do not overlap in toxicity. HIPEC-induced biological changes may enhance the effectiveness of subsequent intraperitoneal chemotherapy. This trial will provide essential data for future phase II/III studies assessing the role of intensified intraperitoneal treatment in ovarian cancer management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Surgical Treatment for Ovarian Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

41 pages, 1531 KiB  
Review
Diagnostic Delay in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Review
by Juan Ángel Fernández, Beatriz Gómez, Daniel Díaz-Gómez, Irene López, Pablo Lozano, Paula Muñoz, Francisco Cristóbal Muñoz-Casares, Vicente Olivares-Ripoll, Hugo Vasques and José Manuel Asencio-Pascual
Cancers 2025, 17(11), 1861; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111861 - 31 May 2025
Viewed by 894
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To review the problem of diagnostic delay in soft tissue sarcomas with the aim of identifying its causes and consequences, understanding how to clinically suspect and refer them, and evaluating the main limitations of the referral guidelines already in use. Methods: A [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To review the problem of diagnostic delay in soft tissue sarcomas with the aim of identifying its causes and consequences, understanding how to clinically suspect and refer them, and evaluating the main limitations of the referral guidelines already in use. Methods: A systematic review of the available literature was performed, focusing on the theoretical framework, the elements and time intervals to be considered, causes and consequences, “red flag” symptoms/signs, the main referral guidelines in use, their results, and the methods used to avoid excessive referrals. Results: Diagnostic delay in soft tissue sarcomas is a frequent event that is poorly characterized and has important consequences, including prognostic, medico-legal and psycho-social effects. The common denominator is the lack of knowledge and awareness. Several referral guidelines have been described, and most of them are based on clinical data. Their results have been disappointing. Thus, it is necessary to implement new methods to improve their results and avoid the overload of pre-referral imaging systems, sarcoma diagnostic triage meetings, and telemedicine systems. Conclusions: Sarcoma units and health system leaders need to study this issue to determine the extent of the problem and its causes. Without this information, it is almost impossible to properly address the problem and take corrective actions. Early referral of suspected soft tissue sarcoma lesions, although desirable, is a complex issue due to the non-specificity of the symptoms. Existing clinical referral guidelines need to be modified to improve detection and conversion rates. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 792 KiB  
Article
Developing Cancer Quality of Care Indicators to Quantify the Impact of a Global Destabilization of the Care System (COLLAT-COVID)
by Nathalie Piazzon, Julie Haesebaert, Philippe Michel, Anne Sophie Belmont, Vahan Kepenekian, Gery Lamblin, Charlotte Costentin and Julien Péron
Cancers 2025, 17(10), 1680; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101680 - 16 May 2025
Viewed by 446
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant disruptions in healthcare systems, particularly impacting cancer care through delays in diagnoses and treatments. Quality indicators (QIs) are essential tools for monitoring healthcare performance, yet existing QIs may not be suited for crises. This study aimed [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant disruptions in healthcare systems, particularly impacting cancer care through delays in diagnoses and treatments. Quality indicators (QIs) are essential tools for monitoring healthcare performance, yet existing QIs may not be suited for crises. This study aimed to develop a set of hospital-based QIs tailored to assess the impact of care reorganization during health crises across four cancer types: breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gynecological cancers (excluding ovarian cancer), and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Methods: A multidisciplinary steering committee (SC) conducted a five-stage process, including a literature review, indicator selection, content validation via the RAND/UCLA method, final validation by the SC, and a pilot feasibility study. QIs were assessed based on clinical relevance, reproducibility, sensitivity to change, and feasibility. Expert panels evaluated and validated the indicators in two rounds of voting. Results: Among 150 initially identified QIs, 49 were validated: 12 for breast cancer, 11 for hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 for gynecological cancers, and 18 for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Most (92%) were process indicators, covering diagnosis, treatment, and care delays. Two common indicators were identified across all four cancers: multidisciplinary team meeting discussions and psychological support consultations. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of developing crisis-responsive QIs to monitor cancer care during health system disruptions. Future work will focus on their real-time implementation, validation in international settings, and integration into healthcare policies to enhance crisis preparedness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3428 KiB  
Article
Safety and Efficacy of Pressurized Intra-Thoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Pleural Carcinomatosis: Preliminary Results of a Pilot Study
by Maria Giovanna Mastromarino, Vittorio Aprile, Gianmarco Elia, Diana Bacchin, Alessandra Lenzini, Stylianos Korasidis, Marcello Carlo Ambrogi, Silvia Martina Ferrari, Poupak Fallahi and Marco Lucchi
Methods Protoc. 2025, 8(3), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8030051 - 14 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 714
Abstract
Pleural carcinomatosis (PC) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affect up to 20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are usually synonymous with poor prognosis. Pressurized Intra-Thoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy (PITAC) is a novel and promising technique to control MPE in PC-NSCLC. [...] Read more.
Pleural carcinomatosis (PC) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affect up to 20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are usually synonymous with poor prognosis. Pressurized Intra-Thoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy (PITAC) is a novel and promising technique to control MPE in PC-NSCLC. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PITAC in terms of palliative pleurodesis and evaluate the local antineoplastic control by analyzing patient-derived primary cell cultures. From January to December 2023, seven patients underwent PITAC with tailored doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin. There were four males and three females, with a median age of 65 (IQR:19) years. No operating room contamination by aerosolized chemotherapeutics was observed. No intraoperative complications occurred, and 30-day mortality was nil. One patient developed a postoperative prolonged air leak. The median chest tube stay was 2 (IQR:2) days, and the median hospital stay was 4 (IQR:2) days. No systemic toxicity nor hypersensitivity to chemotherapeutics were observed. All patients developed effective pleurodesis in 30 days. Cell cultures obtained from biopsy of PC-NSCLC sampled before PITAC formed confluent and monolayer sheets of attached tumor cells, while after 30 min from PITAC, cultures exhibited a significant reduction in the cancer cells’ growth. Effective pleurodesis was observed three and six months after surgery in all patients. PITAC is a safe and effective technique to control MPE recurrence and might revolutionize loco-regional therapy for PC-NSCLC. Further research should assess its oncological role. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sciences and Physiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 696 KiB  
Article
Patterns of Recurrence After Postoperative Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases
by Jeroen A. Crouzen, Anna L. Petoukhova, Martijn Hakstege, Elise E. M. W. van Schaik, Rishi D. S. Nandoe Tewarie, Rob J. A. Nabuurs, Maaike J. Vos, Melissa Kerkhof, Thijs van der Vaart, Johan A. F. Koekkoek, Rogier E. Hagenbeek, Fatih M. Yildirim, Lisette M. Wiltink, Noëlle C. M. G. van der Voort van Zyp, Mandy Kiderlen, Marike L. D. Broekman, Mirjam E. Mast and Jaap D. Zindler
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1557; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091557 - 3 May 2025
Viewed by 724
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neurosurgical resection is the standard treatment for large brain metastases (BMs). Postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is used to reduce local recurrence (LR) but does not always prevent leptomeningeal disease (LMD). This study aims to analyze patterns of tumor recurrence and to identify [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neurosurgical resection is the standard treatment for large brain metastases (BMs). Postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is used to reduce local recurrence (LR) but does not always prevent leptomeningeal disease (LMD). This study aims to analyze patterns of tumor recurrence and to identify opportunities for the further improvement of treatment efficacy. Methods: We included 147 patients who underwent resection and SRT for BMs. The distance between the resection cavity target volume and the new tumor growth was calculated. Cox regression analyses were used to assess associations of LMD with various patient characteristics. Results: Median survival after postoperative SRT was 14 months (IQR 6–30) with a 3-year actuarial survival rate of 21%. LR occurred in 20/147 patients (14%). After total resection, LR occurred in 21% of patients after 3 years of follow-up compared to 36% after subtotal resection. Marginal LR occurred in 5/147 patients (3%). LMD was found in 21/147 patients (14%; 3-year actuarial rate, 26%), and it was found more commonly in patients with resected cerebellar metastases (23%; 3-year actuarial rate, 46%) compared to those with cerebral metastases (11%; 3-year actuarial rate 17%) (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.07–6.04, p = 0.034). Conclusions: This study examined patterns of recurrence after postoperative radiotherapy and its implications for radiation dose, radiation field size, and treatment sequence. Local control was high after total resection. Radiation field size appeared adequate given the low incidence of marginal recurrences. Patients with cerebellar metastases showed an increased risk of LMD, underscoring the need for preventive measures, particularly preoperative SRT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiosurgery for Brain Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 37030 KiB  
Review
The Many Faces of the Angry Peritoneum
by Maria Chiara Ambrosetti, Matilde Bariani, Giulia Angela Zamboni, Riccardo Valletta and Matteo Bonatti
Diagnostics 2025, 15(9), 1163; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091163 - 3 May 2025
Viewed by 752
Abstract
The peritoneum is a thin membrane that lines the abdominal cavity and covers the abdominal organs. It serves as a conduit for the spread of various pathological processes, including gas and fluid collections, inflammation, infections, and neoplastic conditions. Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the most [...] Read more.
The peritoneum is a thin membrane that lines the abdominal cavity and covers the abdominal organs. It serves as a conduit for the spread of various pathological processes, including gas and fluid collections, inflammation, infections, and neoplastic conditions. Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the most common and well-known pathology involving the peritoneum, typically resulting from the dissemination of gastrointestinal and pelvic malignancies. However, numerous benign and malignant peritoneal diseases can mimic the imaging appearance of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The aim of this review is to revisit the anatomy of peritoneal compartments and elucidate the patterns of peritoneal disease spread. Emphasis is placed on identifying the distinctive imaging features of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic peritoneal diseases that differ from peritoneal carcinomatosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop