Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (83)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = biomechanical models—spine

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 3857 KiB  
Review
Utility of Enabling Technologies in Spinal Deformity Surgery: Optimizing Surgical Planning and Intraoperative Execution to Maximize Patient Outcomes
by Nora C. Kim, Eli Johnson, Christopher DeWald, Nathan Lee and Timothy Y. Wang
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5377; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155377 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 647
Abstract
The management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has evolved dramatically over the past century, transitioning from external bracing and in situ fusion to complex, technology-driven surgical interventions. This review traces the historical development of spinal deformity correction and highlights contemporary enabling technologies that [...] Read more.
The management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has evolved dramatically over the past century, transitioning from external bracing and in situ fusion to complex, technology-driven surgical interventions. This review traces the historical development of spinal deformity correction and highlights contemporary enabling technologies that are redefining the surgical landscape. Advances in stereoradiographic imaging now allow for precise, low-dose three-dimensional assessment of spinopelvic parameters and segmental bone density, facilitating individualized surgical planning. Robotic assistance and intraoperative navigation improve the accuracy and safety of instrumentation, while patient-specific rods and interbody implants enhance biomechanical conformity and alignment precision. Machine learning and predictive modeling tools have emerged as valuable adjuncts for risk stratification, surgical planning, and outcome forecasting. Minimally invasive deformity correction strategies, including anterior column realignment and circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS), have demonstrated equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes to traditional open surgery with reduced perioperative morbidity in select patients. Despite these advancements, complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis and failure remain prevalent. Adjunctive strategies—including ligamentous tethering, modified proximal fixation, and vertebral cement augmentation—offer promising preventive potential. Collectively, these innovations signal a paradigm shift toward precision spine surgery, characterized by data-informed decision-making, individualized construct design, and improved patient-centered outcomes in spinal deformity care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical New Insights into Management of Scoliosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1801 KiB  
Article
Finite Element Analysis of Biomechanical Assessment: Traditional Bilateral Pedicle Screw System vs. Novel Reverse Transdiscal Screw System for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
by Utpal K. Dhar, Kamran Aghayev, Hadi Sultan, Saahas Rajendran, Chi-Tay Tsai and Frank D. Vrionis
Bioengineering 2025, 12(6), 671; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060671 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 628
Abstract
The traditional bilateral pedicle screw system has been used for the treatment of various lumbar spine conditions including advanced degenerative disc disease. However, there is an ongoing need to develop more effective and less invasive techniques. The purpose of this study was to [...] Read more.
The traditional bilateral pedicle screw system has been used for the treatment of various lumbar spine conditions including advanced degenerative disc disease. However, there is an ongoing need to develop more effective and less invasive techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the traditional bilateral pedicle screw system (BPSS) with the novel reverse transdiscal screw system (RTSS) for lumbar disc degenerative disease. A 3D solid lumbar L1–L5 spine model was developed and validated based on a human CT scan. Fusions were simulated at L3–L4. The first scenario comprised a transforaminal lumbar interbody cage in combination with the bilateral pedicle screw-rod system (BPSS-TLIF). In the second scenario, the same TLIF cage was combined with reverse L3–L4 transdiscal screws (RTSS-TLIF). Testing parameters included range of motion (ROM) in three orthogonal axes, hardware (cage and screw) stress, and shear load resistance. The ROM of the surgical model was reduced by approximately 90% compared to the intact model at the fused level. The RTSS model demonstrated less ROM compared to the BPSS model at the fused level for all loading conditions. Overall, the RTSS model exhibited lower stress on both screws and cage compared with the BPSS model in all biomechanical testing conditions. The RTSS model also exhibited higher anterior and posterior shear load resistance than the BPSS model. In conclusion, the RTSS model proved superior to the BPSS model in all respects. These findings indicate that the RTSS could serve as a feasible option for patients undergoing lumbar fusion, especially for adjacent segment disease, potentially enhancing surgical outcomes for disc degeneration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Biomechanics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2913 KiB  
Article
Occupant Kinematic and Injury Responses in Zero-Gravity Seat Under Low-, Medium-, and High-Speed Rear Impacts with Different Seat Belt Systems
by Wenqiong Tu, Peiwen Zhang, Jing Zhang, Yang Liu, Xin Ye and Xuerong Zhang
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(12), 6388; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126388 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 659
Abstract
This study investigates occupant kinematic and injury responses in zero-gravity seats under rear impacts at 16 km/h, 40 km/h, and 56 km/h and evaluates the protective performance of a conventional three-point seat belt system and a four-point seat belt system. First, a THUMS [...] Read more.
This study investigates occupant kinematic and injury responses in zero-gravity seats under rear impacts at 16 km/h, 40 km/h, and 56 km/h and evaluates the protective performance of a conventional three-point seat belt system and a four-point seat belt system. First, a THUMS (Total Human Model for Safety)-based finite element assembly consisting of a regular seat model and a conventional three-point seat belt system was verified by comparing the kinematic responses and time-history curves of head acceleration, head rotation, and the T1 acceleration of PMHS (Postmortem Human Subject) tests. Then, a THUMS-based finite element assembly in a zero-gravity seat with a three-point seat belt system was created, and computational biomechanical analyses revealed that at low-to-medium impact speeds (16 and 40 km/h), the occupant exhibited backward sliding in the zero-gravity seat along the seatback with lower limb rotation and did not experience head and neck injury. However, a 56 km/h impact induced an excessive seatback rotation and caused the head to become out of position. The neck collided with the upper part of the headrest and caused a surge in the contact force between the neck and the headrest. The head injury and neck injury were comprehensively analyzed via the head injury metrics and neck injury metrics, including cervical spine injury metrics and cervical ligament injury metrics. Further, a four-point seat belt system was adopted and demonstrated better and more balanced restraining effects by reducing the relative displacement between the occupant’s head and chest in the x- and y-directions by 26% and 84%, respectively. Therefore, the occupant’s head remains in position and the collision between the neck and the headrest can be avoided. Maximum reductions in the head and neck injury metrics reached 70% and 57%, respectively. The current study illustrates the disadvantages of the traditional three-point seat belt system in restraining the occupant in a zero-gravity seat under rear impact and shows the four-point seat belt to be a better alternative. This study sheds light on seat belt system design and optimization towards future zero-gravity seats under rear impact. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3600 KiB  
Article
Human Cervical Intervertebral Disc Pressure Response During Non-Injurious Quasistatic Motion: A Feasibility Study
by Sara Sochor, Jesús R. Jiménez Octavio, Carlos J. Carpintero Rubio, Mark R. Sochor, Juan M. Asensio-Gil, Carlos Rodríguez-Morcillo García and Francisco J. Lopez-Valdes
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(11), 6167; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116167 - 30 May 2025
Viewed by 895
Abstract
The human neck is highly vulnerable in motor vehicle crashes, and cervical spine response data are essential to improve injury prediction tools (e.g., crash test dummies, human body models). This feasibility study aimed to implement the use of pressure sensors in whole-body post-mortem [...] Read more.
The human neck is highly vulnerable in motor vehicle crashes, and cervical spine response data are essential to improve injury prediction tools (e.g., crash test dummies, human body models). This feasibility study aimed to implement the use of pressure sensors in whole-body post-mortem human subject (PMHS) cervical spine intervertebral discs (IVDs) to confirm the feasibility and repeatability of cervical IVD pressure response to biomechanic research. Two fresh frozen whole-body PMHSs were instrumented with miniature pressure sensors (Model 060S, Precision Measurement Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) at three cervical IVD levels (C3/C4, C5/C6, and C7/T1) using minimally invasive surgical insertion techniques. Each PMHS underwent three quasistatic motion test trials, and each trial included multiple head/neck motions (i.e., gentle traction, flexion/extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and forced tension/compression). Results showed marked pressure differences between both the cervical level assessed and the motion undertaken as well as successful intra-subject repeatability between the three motion trials. This study demonstrates that changes in cervical IVD pressure are associated with motion events of the cervical spine. Cervical IVD response data could be utilized to assess and supplement the characterization of the head/neck complex motion, and data could facilitate the continued improvement of injury prediction tools. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanics and Ergonomics in Prevention of Injuries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3887 KiB  
Article
A Mathematical Analysis of a Biomechanical Model for an Innovative Spinal Decompression and Correction System for the Conservative Treatment of Scoliosis
by Yi Jie, Mingwen Zhang, Mengyao Li, Changliang Luo, Anqin Dong, Yu-Yan Luo, Pengyuan Zheng, Xinmin Zhang, Zhihua Liu, Jing Li, Man-Sang Wong, Annie Yan Wang, Christina Zong-Hao Ma and Ming Zhang
Bioengineering 2025, 12(5), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12050509 - 11 May 2025
Viewed by 782
Abstract
Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine that can lead to a series of physical and psychological problems. Appropriate controlling forces should be applied to prevent the curve’s progression and even correct the deformity. The aims of this study were to develop [...] Read more.
Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine that can lead to a series of physical and psychological problems. Appropriate controlling forces should be applied to prevent the curve’s progression and even correct the deformity. The aims of this study were to develop a biomechanical model that can quickly estimate the optimal positions and magnitudes of the controlling forces for treating scoliosis and to analyze the interaction between longitudinal traction and lateral forces. Based on the scoliotic curve information that was extracted and simulated from the computed tomography data of patients, a mathematical model of scoliosis was established via the Timoshenko beam theory. The model could be optimized to provide precise and effective treatment for patients with different scoliosis curve patterns. The relationship between the corrective force position, magnitude, and the treatment effect on scoliosis could be obtained using this model. This study provides a biomechanical theoretical basis for determining the magnitude, position, and sequence of applying controlling forces on spines for patients with scoliosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomechanics and Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7539 KiB  
Article
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental Approach
by Luca Ciriello and Tomaso Villa
Biomechanics 2025, 5(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics5020026 - 20 Apr 2025
Viewed by 434
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The conventional practice in clinical settings involves using multi-use surgical instrumentation (SI). However, there is a growing trend towards transforming these multi-use SIs into disposable surgical instruments, driven by economic and environmental considerations without considering the biomechanical aspects. This study focuses on [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The conventional practice in clinical settings involves using multi-use surgical instrumentation (SI). However, there is a growing trend towards transforming these multi-use SIs into disposable surgical instruments, driven by economic and environmental considerations without considering the biomechanical aspects. This study focuses on redesigning an SI kit for implanting cervical spinal facet cages. Understanding the boundary conditions (forces, torques, and bending moments) acting on the SI during surgery is crucial for optimizing its design and materials. Therefore, this study aims to develop a measurement system (MS) to record these loads during implantation and validate it through in vitro testing. Methods: A combined numerical–experimental approach was used to design and calibrate the MS. Finite element analysis (FE) was used to optimize the geometry of the sensitive element of the MS. This was followed by the manufacturing phase using 3D printing and then by calibration tests to determine the stiffness of the system. Finally, the MS was used to measure the boundary conditions applied during SI use during in vitro tests on a cervical Sawbone spine. Results: After designing the measurement system (MS) via finite element analysis, calibration tests determined stiffness values of KF = 1.2385 N/(µm/m) (axial compression), KT = −0.0015 Nm/(µm/m) (torque), and KB = 0.0242 Nm/(µm/m) (non-axial force). In vitro tests identified maximum loads of 40.84 N (compression) and 0.11 Nm (torque). Conclusions: This study developed a measurement system to assess surgical implant boundary conditions. The data will support finite element modeling, guiding the optimization of implant design and materials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Injury Biomechanics and Rehabilitation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2073 KiB  
Article
In Vitro Biomechanical Experiment on the Effect of Unilateral Partial Facetectomy Performed by Percutaneous Endoscopy on the Stability of Lumbar Spine
by Tao Ma, Xiaoshuang Tu, Junyang Li, Jingwei Wu and Luming Nong
Bioengineering 2025, 12(4), 414; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040414 - 14 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 475
Abstract
Objectives: This study’s purpose is to investigate the lumbar biomechanical effects of unilateral partial facetectomy (UPF) of different facet joint (FJ) portions under percutaneous endoscopy. Methods: Forty fresh calf spine models were used to simulate UPF under a physiological load performed through three [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study’s purpose is to investigate the lumbar biomechanical effects of unilateral partial facetectomy (UPF) of different facet joint (FJ) portions under percutaneous endoscopy. Methods: Forty fresh calf spine models were used to simulate UPF under a physiological load performed through three commonly used needle insertion points (IPs): (1) The apex of the superior FJ (as the first IP); (2) The midpoint of the ventral side of the superior FJ (as the second IP); (3) The lowest point of the ventral side of the superior FJ (as the third IP). The range of motion (ROM) and the L4/5 intradiscal maximum pressure (IMP) were measured and analyzed under a physiological load in all models during flexion, extension, left–right lateral flexion, and left–right axial rotation. Results: When UPF was performed through the second IP, the ROM of the lumbar spine and the L4/5 IMP in the calf spine models were not statistically different from the intact calf spine model. Conclusions: UPF through the second IP resulted in a minimal impact on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine. Thus, it might be considered the most appropriate IP for UPF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomechanics and Motion Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3740 KiB  
Article
A Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Interspinous Process Device: In Vitro Flexibility Assessment and Finite Element Analysis
by Hangkai Shen, Chuanguang Ju, Tao Gao, Jia Zhu and Weiqiang Liu
Bioengineering 2025, 12(4), 384; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040384 - 3 Apr 2025
Viewed by 660
Abstract
The interspinous process device (IPD) has emerged as a viable alternative for managing lumbar degenerative pathologies. Nevertheless, limited research exists regarding mechanical failure modes including device failure and spinous process fracture. This study developed a novel IPD (IPD-NEW) and systematically evaluated its biomechanical [...] Read more.
The interspinous process device (IPD) has emerged as a viable alternative for managing lumbar degenerative pathologies. Nevertheless, limited research exists regarding mechanical failure modes including device failure and spinous process fracture. This study developed a novel IPD (IPD-NEW) and systematically evaluated its biomechanical characteristics through finite element (FE) analysis and in vitro cadaveric biomechanical testing. Six human L1–L5 lumbar specimens were subjected to mechanical testing under four experimental conditions: (1) Intact spine (control); (2) L3–L4 implanted with IPD-NEW; (3) L3–L4 implanted with Wallis device; (4) L3–L4 implanted with Coflex device. Segmental range of motion (ROM) was quantified across all test conditions. A validated L1–L5 finite element model was subsequently employed to assess biomechanical responses under both static and vertical vibration loading regimes. Comparative analysis revealed that IPD-NEW demonstrated comparable segmental ROM to the Wallis device while exhibiting lower rigidity than the Coflex implant. The novel design effectively preserved physiological spinal mobility while enhancing load distribution capacity. IPD-NEW demonstrated notable reductions in facet joint forces, device stress concentrations, and spinous process loading compared to conventional implants, particularly under vibrational loading conditions. These findings suggest that IPD-NEW may mitigate risks associated with facetogenic pain, device failure, and spinous process fracture through optimized load redistribution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Joint Biomechanics and Implant Design)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 5665 KiB  
Article
Role of Additional Screws and Rod Fixation in Cage Loading During Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis
by Yu-Hsuan Chung, Ming-Hsien Hu, Hong-Lin Su, Yen-Nien Chen and Heng-Chih Chang
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 1890; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061890 - 11 Mar 2025
Viewed by 945
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Additional lateral fixation is a method with the potential to redistribute cage loading during oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). However, its biomechanical effects remain poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the mechanical responses of the lumbar spine following OLIF, both [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Additional lateral fixation is a method with the potential to redistribute cage loading during oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). However, its biomechanical effects remain poorly understood. This study aimed to compare the mechanical responses of the lumbar spine following OLIF, both with and without additional lateral fixation, using a finite element (FE) analysis. Methods: An FE lumbar model with an OLIF cage at the L4–L5 levels was developed. A lateral fixation system comprising screws and a rod was incorporated to redistribute the cage loading and enhance spinal stability. Two OLIF cage positions—centered and at an oblique angle—were compared. Results: The additional lateral fixation reduced cage loading by 70% (409 to 123 N) and 72% (411 to 114 N) for the centered and oblique cage positions, respectively. Without lateral fixation, the peak equivalent stress on the cage during extension increased threefold (66 to 198 MPa) for the oblique position compared with that for the centered position. Conclusions: An additional lateral screw–rod fixation system is suggested as a complementary approach to the OLIF technique to mitigate endplate loading and pressure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinal Disorders: Current Treatment and Future Opportunities: Part II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 5862 KiB  
Article
A Muscle-Driven Spine Model for Predictive Simulations in the Design of Spinal Implants and Lumbar Orthoses
by Robin Remus, Andreas Lipphaus, Marisa Ritter, Marc Neumann and Beate Bender
Bioengineering 2025, 12(3), 263; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030263 - 6 Mar 2025
Viewed by 2464
Abstract
Knowledge of realistic loads is crucial in the engineering design process of medical devices and for assessing their interaction with the spinal system. Depending on the type of modeling, current numerical spine models generally either neglect the active musculature or oversimplify the passive [...] Read more.
Knowledge of realistic loads is crucial in the engineering design process of medical devices and for assessing their interaction with the spinal system. Depending on the type of modeling, current numerical spine models generally either neglect the active musculature or oversimplify the passive structural function of the spine. However, the internal loading conditions of the spine are complex and greatly influenced by muscle forces. It is often unclear whether the assumptions made provide realistic results. To improve the prediction of realistic loading conditions in both conservative and surgical treatments, we modified a previously validated forward dynamic musculoskeletal model of the intact lumbosacral spine with a muscle-driven approach in three scenarios. These exploratory treatment scenarios included an extensible lumbar orthosis and spinal instrumentations. The latter comprised bisegmental internal spinal fixation, as well as monosegmental lumbar fusion using an expandable interbody cage with supplementary posterior fixation. The biomechanical model responses, including internal loads on spinal instrumentation, influences on adjacent segments, and effects on abdominal soft tissue, correlated closely with available in vivo data. The muscle forces contributing to spinal movement and stabilization were also reliably predicted. This new type of modeling enables the biomechanical study of the interactions between active and passive spinal structures and technical systems. It is, therefore, preferable in the design of medical devices and for more realistically assessing treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Biomechanics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3597 KiB  
Article
Biomechanical Changes in Kyphotic Cervical Spine After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Different Degrees of Correction
by Hongyu Chen, Xu Ma, Shengfa Pan, Li Zhang, Yanbin Zhao, Xin Chen, Yu Sun and Feifei Zhou
Bioengineering 2025, 12(3), 213; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030213 - 20 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1048
Abstract
Cervical kyphosis is a debilitating disease, and its surgical treatment involves correction to restore sagittal alignment. Few studies have explored the appropriate degree of correction, and the biomechanical impact of correction on the cervical spine is still unclear. This study aimed to compare [...] Read more.
Cervical kyphosis is a debilitating disease, and its surgical treatment involves correction to restore sagittal alignment. Few studies have explored the appropriate degree of correction, and the biomechanical impact of correction on the cervical spine is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical changes in the cervical spine after different degrees of correction by two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of the intact cervical spine (C2–C7) with normal physiological lordosis and kyphosis were constructed. Based on the kyphotic model, three two-level ACDF in C4–6 surgical models were developed: (1) non-correction: only the intervertebral heights were restored; (2) partial correction: the cervical curvature was adjusted to straighten; (3) complete correction: the cervical curvature was adjusted to physiological lordosis. A pure moment of 1.0 Nm combined with a follower load of 73.6 N was applied to the C2 vertebra to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The stress of vertical bodies and facet joints, intradiscal pressure (IDP), and the overall ROMs of all models were computed. The peak von Mises stress on the upper (C4) and lower (C6) instrumented vertebral bodies in the kyphotic model was greater than that of the physiological lordosis model, with the exception of C6 under lateral bending. The maximum stress was observed in C4 during lateral bending after complete correction, which increased by 145% compared to preoperative von Mises stress. For the middle (C5) instrumented vertebral body, the peak von Mises stress increased after surgery. The maximum stress was observed in partial correction during flexion. Compared to physiological lordosis, the peak von Mises stress on the facet joints in kyphotic segments was lower; however, it was higher in the adjacent segments, except C4/5 in extension. The stress on the facet joints in kyphotic segments decreased, with the most significant decrease observed in partial correction. The IDPs in adjacent segments, except for C6/7 in flexion, showed no significant difference before and after surgery. Additionally, correction seemed to have little impact on IDPs in adjacent segments. In conclusion, for the treatment of cervical kyphosis with two-level ACDF, complete correction resulted in the highest peak von Mises stress on the upper instrumented vertebral body. Partial correction mitigated von Mises stress within the facet joints in kyphotic segments, albeit at the expense of high von Mises stress on the middle instrumented vertebral body. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomechanics and Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 7406 KiB  
Article
A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior
by Mario Ceddia, Luciano Lamberti and Bartolomeo Trentadue
Biomimetics 2025, 10(2), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10020072 - 24 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1487
Abstract
The mechanical properties of materials for spinal fixation can significantly affect spinal surgical outcomes. Traditional materials such as titanium exhibit high stiffness, which can lead to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration. This study investigates the biomechanical performance of titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) [...] Read more.
The mechanical properties of materials for spinal fixation can significantly affect spinal surgical outcomes. Traditional materials such as titanium exhibit high stiffness, which can lead to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration. This study investigates the biomechanical performance of titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) in spinal fixation using finite element analysis, through the evaluation of the Shielding Strength Factor (SSF). Methods: A three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) model of an L4/L5 functional spinal unit was developed to simulate the mechanical behavior of three fixation systems: titanium screws and rods (model A), titanium screws with PEEK rods (model B), and PEEK screws and rods (model C). The analysis evaluated stress distribution and load transfer under physiological conditions, in comparison with the intact spine (baseline model). Results: The analysis showed that titanium fixation systems resulted in higher stress shielding effects, with a significant difference in stress distribution compared to PEEK. The maximum stress recorded in the neutral position was 24.145 MPa for PEEK, indicating better biomechanical compatibility. Conclusions: The results suggest that PEEK may be an attractive alternative to titanium for spinal fixation, promoting more healthy load transfer and minimizing the risk of stress shielding complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanical Properties and Functions of Bionic Materials/Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3647 KiB  
Article
Intramedullary Stress and Strain Correlate with Neurological Dysfunction in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
by Mahmudur Rahman, Karthik Banurekha Devaraj, Omkar Chauhan, Balaji Harinathan, Narayan Yoganandan and Aditya Vedantam
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(2), 886; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020886 - 17 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1089
Abstract
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is characterized by progressive neurological dysfunction, yet the contribution of intramedullary stress and strain during neck motion remains unclear. This study used patient-specific finite element models (FEMs) of the cervical spine and spinal cord to examine the relationship between [...] Read more.
Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is characterized by progressive neurological dysfunction, yet the contribution of intramedullary stress and strain during neck motion remains unclear. This study used patient-specific finite element models (FEMs) of the cervical spine and spinal cord to examine the relationship between spinal cord biomechanics and neurological dysfunction. Twenty DCM patients (mean age 62.7 ± 11.6 years; thirteen females) underwent pre-surgical MRI-based modeling to quantify von Mises stress and maximum principal strains at the level of maximum spinal cord compression during simulated neck flexion and extension. Pre-surgical functional assessments included hand sensation, dexterity, and balance. During flexion, the mean intramedullary stress and strain at the level of maximum compression were 7.6 ± 3.7 kPa and 4.3 ± 2.0%, respectively. Increased intramedullary strain during flexion correlated with decreased right-hand sensation (r = −0.58, p = 0.014), impaired right-hand dexterity (r = −0.50, p = 0.048), and prolonged dexterity time (r = 0.52, p = 0.039). Similar correlations were observed with intramedullary stress. Patients with severe DCM exhibited significantly greater stress during flexion than those with mild/moderate disease (p = 0.03). These findings underscore the impact of dynamic spinal cord biomechanics on neurological dysfunction and support their potential utility in improving DCM diagnosis and management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Applied Biomechanics and Sports Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 333 KiB  
Article
Machine-Learning-Based Biomechanical Feature Analysis for Orthopedic Patient Classification with Disc Hernia and Spondylolisthesis
by Daniel Nasef, Demarcus Nasef, Viola Sawiris, Peter Girgis and Milan Toma
BioMedInformatics 2025, 5(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedinformatics5010003 - 7 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2091
Abstract
(1) Background: The exploration of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for classifying the state of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs (IVD) in orthopedic patients is the focus of this study. The classification is based on six key biomechanical features of the pelvis and lumbar [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The exploration of various machine learning (ML) algorithms for classifying the state of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs (IVD) in orthopedic patients is the focus of this study. The classification is based on six key biomechanical features of the pelvis and lumbar spine. Although previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of ML models in diagnosing IVD pathology using imaging modalities, there is a scarcity of studies using biomechanical features. (2) Methods: The study utilizes a dataset that encompasses two classification tasks. The first task classifies patients into Normal and Abnormal based on their IVDs (2C). The second task further classifies patients into three groups: Normal, Disc Hernia, and Spondylolisthesis (3C). The performance of various ML models, including decision trees, support vector machines, and neural networks, is evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, AUC, recall, precision, F1, Kappa, and MCC. These models are trained on two open-source datasets, using the PyCaret library in Python. (3) Results: The findings suggest that an ensemble of Random Forest and Logistic Regression models performs best for the 2C classification, while the Extra Trees classifier performs best for the 3C classification. The models demonstrate an accuracy of up to 90.83% and a precision of up to 91.86%, highlighting the effectiveness of ML models in diagnosing IVD pathology. The analysis of the weight of different biomechanical features in the decision-making processes of the models provides insights into the biomechanical changes involved in the pathogenesis of Lumbar IVD abnormalities. (4) Conclusions: This research contributes to the ongoing efforts to leverage data-driven ML models in improving patient outcomes in orthopedic care. The effectiveness of the models for both diagnosis and furthering understanding of Lumbar IVD herniations and spondylolisthesis is outlined. The limitations of AI use in clinical settings are discussed, and areas for future improvement to create more accurate and informative models are suggested. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 15440 KiB  
Article
Biomechanical Analysis of Stress–Strain Distribution in the Lumbar Spine–Sacrum–Pelvis System with Emphasis on Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
by Andrii Kondratiev, Natalia Smetankina and Volodymyr Staude
Prosthesis 2025, 7(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis7010004 - 31 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2532
Abstract
Background: Chronic lumbopelvic pain is often linked to sacroiliac joint dysfunction, where the joint’s complex structure and biomechanics complicate diagnosis and treatment. Variability in load distribution and ligament stabilization within the pelvic ring further contributes to challenges in managing this condition. This study [...] Read more.
Background: Chronic lumbopelvic pain is often linked to sacroiliac joint dysfunction, where the joint’s complex structure and biomechanics complicate diagnosis and treatment. Variability in load distribution and ligament stabilization within the pelvic ring further contributes to challenges in managing this condition. This study aims to develop a finite element model of the “lumbar spine–sacrum–pelvis” system to analyze the effects of lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and asymmetrical articular gaps on stress and strain in the sacroiliac joint. Methods: A three-dimensional model was constructed using CT and MRI data, including key stabilizing ligaments. Sacral slope angles of 30°, 60°, and 85° were used to simulate varying lordosis, while pelvic tilt was introduced through a 6° lateral rotation. Results: The analysis revealed that sacral slope, ligament integrity, and joint symmetry significantly influence stress distribution. Hyperlordosis led to critical stress levels in interosseous and iliolumbar ligaments, exceeding failure thresholds. Asymmetrical gaps and pelvic tilt further altered the sacral rotation axis, increasing stress on sacroiliac joint ligaments. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of maintaining sacroiliac joint symmetry and lumbar–pelvic alignment to minimize stress on stabilizing ligaments, suggesting that treatment should focus on restoring alignment and joint symmetry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Implants – Materials and Mechanics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop