Search Results (510)

Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing disproportionately among Hispanic/Latino (H/L) populations and demonstrates substantial molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Although Wingless/Integrated (WNT) pathway alterations are among the most common genomic events in colorectal cancer, their prognostic significance in the context of contemporary systemic therapies, including Bevacizumab, remains incompletely understood. We conducted an integrative clinical–genomic analysis of colorectal cancer cohorts stratified by age at diagnosis, ancestry, and Bevacizumab exposure, interrogating somatic alterations across curated WNT signaling pathway genes. Conversational artificial intelligence agents (AI-HOPE and AI-HOPE-WNT) enabled dynamic cohort construction, treatment-specific subgroup analyses, and pathway-level interrogation through natural language-driven clinical–genomic integration. WNT pathway alterations, predominantly involving APC, were highly prevalent across all cohorts; however, their distribution and clinical associations demonstrated strong treatment-, ancestry-, and age-dependent variability. Bevacizumab-treated tumors exhibited lower mutation frequencies in several WNT regulators, including RNF43, AXIN1/2, TCF7L2, and AMER1, suggesting potential biologic interaction or treatment-related selective pressure. Importantly, WNT pathway alterations were associated with improved overall survival in H/L EOCRC and Non-Hispanic White (NHW) late-onset colorectal cancer, but with worse survival in NHW EOCRC, highlighting distinct ancestry- and age-specific prognostic effects. These findings support the role of the WNT pathway dysregulation as a disparity-aware biomarker framework in colorectal cancer and demonstrate the utility of conversational AI systems for scalable multidimensional clinical–genomic integration in precision oncology. Full article

Headache is a frequent and clinically relevant symptom in patients undergoing cranial radiotherapy, most often reflecting treatment-induced structural and inflammatory changes such as cerebral edema or radiation-related brain injury. Differentiating secondary headache from primary disorders, particularly migraine, is essential for appropriate management. This review aims to examine the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying headache following cranial radiotherapy, evaluate current pharmacological and complementary treatment strategies and highlight key aspects of differential diagnosis with migraine. Unlike existing literature that focuses primarily on radiological findings of radiation injury, this review adopts a symptom-driven approach, reframing headache as a critical clinical gateway for the early detection of structural complications. A structured narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar to identify studies published between 2020 and 2025, focusing on cerebral edema, radiation-related complications, therapeutic approaches and migraine. Relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and guidelines were included. Cerebral edema consistently emerges as the main mechanism of acute and subacute post-radiotherapy headache, whereas late-onset symptoms are most often linked to radiation necrosis. Corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, while bevacizumab has demonstrated benefit in steroid-refractory cerebral edema and radiation necrosis through inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thereby reducing vascular permeability and attenuating peritumoral edema. Its use in the context of cranial radiotherapy requires careful consideration, as the safety of concomitant administration with radiation has not been formally established, and headache itself is among its recognized adverse effects. Evidence for complementary therapies, including Boswellia serrata and plant-based compounds, remains limited. Migraine constitutes a distinct neurovascular disorder requiring careful differentiation from secondary headache in oncological patients. The review emphasizes headache as a clinically relevant indicator of underlying structural complications rather than an isolated symptom. Post-radiotherapy headache should be interpreted as a manifestation of underlying structural pathology. Accurate etiological diagnosis and individualized management are essential. Further research is needed to refine treatment strategies and clarify the role of complementary therapies. Full article

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progresses after standard first- and second-line therapies carries a poor prognosis, and multiple third-line treatment options are available without a clearly established optimal strategy. This study aimed to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of currently approved third-line treatments using reconstructed individual patient data (reconstructed IPD). Methods: A systematic review and reconstructed IPD meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-IPD guidelines. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were digitized and reconstructed using validated methodologies. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 3338 patients were included across five treatment groups: regorafenib (n = 650), fruquintinib (n = 739), trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102; n = 780), TAS-102 plus bevacizumab (n = 246), and pooled placebo (n = 923). TAS-102 plus bevacizumab demonstrated the greatest benefit (OS HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.35–0.50; median OS: 10.89 months; PFS HR: 0.20, median PFS: 5.51 months). Fruquintinib (OS HR: 0.67; median OS: 7.97 months; PFS HR: 0.32; median PFS: 3.70 months) and TAS-102 (OS HR: 0.70; median OS: 7.2 months; PFS HR: 0.41; median PFS: 2.09 months) showed comparable survival benefit to regorafenib (OS HR: 0.68; median OS: 7.04 months; PFS HR: 0.39; median PFS: 2.16 months), with fruquintinib demonstrating superior PFS versus regorafenib (HR: 0.71, p < 0.001). Grade ≥3 AEs were highest with TAS-102 plus bevacizumab (72.36%) and lowest with fruquintinib (34.02%), with hematologic toxicity predominating in TAS-102-based regimens and hypertension and hand–foot skin reactions more common with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conclusion: TAS-102 plus bevacizumab was associated with the greatest survival benefit in this indirect comparison and appears to be the most effective option for eligible patients. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the absence of direct head-to-head trials. Among tyrosine kinase inhibitors, fruquintinib demonstrated superior PFS compared with regorafenib, while OS was comparable. Full article

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the most common primary liver cancer and a significant cause of global cancer-related mortality, with the majority of patients diagnosed at advanced or unresectable stages. Historically, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapies such as sorafenib and lenvatinib served as the primary systemic standard of care. However, the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI)-based combinations has significantly transformed the treatment landscape. We aim to perform a comparative analysis of ICPI-based combination treatment versus TKI monotherapy among advanced HCC patients. Methods: This study utilized a reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) pooled analysis derived from nine phase 3 randomized clinical trials, adhering to PRISMA-IPD reporting guidelines. A total of 6161 patients were included in the analysis, which categorized treatment into five primary strategies: ICPI monotherapy, ICPI plus bevacizumab, dual ICPI therapy (duplet), ICPI plus TKI, and TKI monotherapy as the control group. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS) and the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs). Results: The analysis demonstrated that ICPI-based combinations provided a significant survival advantage over TKI monotherapy. Key hazard ratios (HRs) for OS compared to TKIs were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67–0.85, p < 0.001) for dual ICPI, 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68–0.85, p < 0.001) for ICPI plus TKI, and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.61–0.81, p < 0.001) for ICPI plus bevacizumab. Median OS was numerically highest for ICPI plus TKI at 19.68 months and dual ICPI at 19.58 months compared to 14.84 months for the TKI group. Among FDA-approved regimens, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NivoIpi) achieved the longest median OS of 24.08 months. From a safety standpoint, the ICPI plus TKI group had the highest incidence of grade 3/4 AEs at 69.1%. Conversely, TKI monotherapy showed a 50.1% incidence, while dual ICPI therapy exhibited the most favorable safety profile at 32.7%. Conclusions: ICPI-containing combination therapies are superior to TKI monotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced HCC, providing marked improvements in survival outcomes. Dual ICPI therapy represents the most balanced approach between efficacy and safety, achieving high survival with the lowest rates of severe toxicity. Among approved options, NivoIpi exhibited a numerically favorable survival signal, while DurvaTreme offered the highest tolerability, supporting a personalized treatment approach based on individual patient risk factors and hepatic reserve. Full article

Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast has a unique metastatic pattern due to E-cadherin deficiency, with a predilection for peritoneal, gastrointestinal, and pelvic organ involvement. Ovarian metastasis from ILC is rare but can mimic primary ovarian cancer clinically and radiologically, leading to misdiagnosis and unnecessary radical surgery. This study aimed to summarize the imaging features of ovarian metastasis from ILC and analyze the causes of misdiagnosis, while highlighting the value of preoperative biopsy. Methods: Clinical and imaging data of six patients with pathologically confirmed ovarian metastasis from ILC were retrospectively analyzed. All six patients were female (age range 33–65 years), had a history of breast cancer (ILC subtype), and were found to have ovarian masses either during follow-up or at initial diagnosis. Imaging findings of the ovaries, peritoneum, and ascites were analyzed and compared with initial clinical diagnoses and pathological results. Results: Among the six patients, five were initially clinically misdiagnosed as having primary ovarian cancer and underwent unnecessary total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. One patient (case 6) was correctly diagnosed via percutaneous biopsy of the omentum and skin nodules, which confirmed metastatic ILC, thereby avoiding unnecessary gynecological surgery. Imaging findings: All six patients had bilateral ovarian masses, appearing as solid or cystic-solid lesions. Peritoneal changes were observed in four cases. Ascites was present in five cases. Laboratory findings showed marked variability in CA125 levels (normal in three cases, elevated in three cases). Immunohistochemistry confirmed breast origin in all cases (GATA3+, PAX8−, E-cadherin−). In case 6, after four cycles of chemotherapy (albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab), follow-up CT demonstrated significant reduction in ovarian masses and regression of peritoneal and omental lesions. Conclusions: Ovarian metastasis from ILC is easily misdiagnosed as primary ovarian cancer without histologic confirmation, leading to unnecessary radical surgery. However, as demonstrated in case 6, percutaneous biopsy of accessible metastatic sites (omentum, peritoneum, or skin nodules) can establish the correct diagnosis and guide systemic therapy, thereby avoiding unnecessary surgery. In case 6, the ILC ovarian metastasis showed a favorable response to chemotherapy, but this single-case finding requires cautious interpretation as ILC is generally considered less chemosensitive than invasive ductal carcinoma. In patients with a history of breast cancer or with suspected metastatic disease, ILC metastasis should be included in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses. Full article

Background/Objectives: The efficacy of lenvatinib after different first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed 56 patients with unresectable HCC who received lenvatinib as second-line therapy after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev; n = 41) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre; n = 15). Antitumor response was evaluated using RECIST v1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST). Results: Patients in the Dur/Tre group demonstrated significantly lower disease control rates (46.7% vs. 82.9%, p = 0.014) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median, 56 vs. 210 days; p = 0.015) during prior ICI therapy, indicating more refractory disease. Despite this, lenvatinib demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity after both Atz/Bev and Dur/Tre. Objective response rates were 12.2% vs. 26.7% by RECIST v1.1 and 41.5% vs. 60.0% by mRECIST in the Atz/Bev and Dur/Tre groups, respectively. Similar findings were observed in the Child–Pugh class A subgroup, in which mRECIST response rates were numerically higher in the Dur/Tre group. PFS and overall survival (OS) after lenvatinib initiation were comparable between groups. Objective responses were observed even in patients with progressive disease during prior ICI therapy. Multivariate analysis identified ECOG performance status and mALBI grade, but not prior ICI regimen or antitumor response, as independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Lenvatinib demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy after both Atz/Bev and Dur/Tre, and no significant association was observed between prior ICI response and subsequent lenvatinib efficacy. These findings suggest that resistance to immunotherapy does not necessarily confer resistance to lenvatinib in patients with unresectable HCC. The observed differences in response patterns according to prior treatment exposure warrant further investigation and may have implications for treatment sequencing in the current ICI era. However, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger multicenter studies. Full article

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with a significant proportion of patients presenting with metastatic disease (mCRC). While molecularly targeted therapies, including anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF agents, have improved survival outcomes, their efficacy is often limited by drug resistance, toxicity, and high costs. There is a growing need for sustainable strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Methods: This review explores the emerging role of plant-derived compounds as synergistic adjuvants. Specifically, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English-language articles published between January 2004 and June 2026, using combination of terms related to colorectal cancer, metastatic disease, anti-EGFR/anti-VEGF targeted therapy, phytochemicals/natural products, and gut microbiota; both primary studies and reviews were eligible. Results: Targeted therapies such as cetuximab and bevacizumab are the standard of care but face challenges related to RAS/BRAF mutations and primary tumour location. Clinical data demonstrate that while cetuximab improves overall survival in patients with RAS wild-type, left-sided tumours (median OS 31 vs. 26 months; HR 0.76, p = 0.012), progression-free survival remains comparable to that of bevacizumab. Concurrently, natural products like Vitis vinifera, Dendrobium candidum, and quercetin demonstrate significant preclinical potential in inhibiting angiogenesis, inducing apoptosis, and modulating the tumour microenvironment. The gut microbiome, particularly Fusobacterium nucleatum (whose reported prevalence varies widely across cohorts and reaches up to ~98% of CRC tissues only in selected series), has emerged as a key factor in chemoresistance. It should be emphasised that the great majority of the phytochemical-targeted therapy combinations discussed here are currently supported primarily by preclinical (in vitro and animal) studies rather than by clinical trials. Conclusions: Integrating evidence-based phytochemicals with conventional targeted therapies is a mechanistically compelling and potentially sustainable strategy that may enhance therapeutic efficacy, help overcome resistance, and mitigate adverse effects in mCRC management. However, because current support is largely preclinical, these combinations should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require validation in prospective, biomarker-stratified clinical trials before clinical adoption. Full article

Background/Objectives: Triple therapy combining targeted therapy (lenvatinib/bevacizumab), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and interventional therapy (TACE/HAIC) has shown promising efficacy, but clinical outcomes differ among patients. We developed and tested a prognostic model based on sex, ALBI grade, and ALR to estimate survival in patients with intermediate-to-advanced HCC receiving triple therapy. Methods: This single center retrospective study included 184 intermediate-to-advanced HCC patients between November 2017 and December 2024. The patients enrolled received lenvatinib (n = 88) or bevacizumab (n = 96) plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and interventional therapy. The risk scoring model was derived from univariate Cox regression, LASSO Cox regression, and multivariate Cox regression analyses that were screened for independent prognostic factors. The median risk score defined the cutoff for separating patients into two risk subgroups (high- and low-risk). Overall survival (OS) across subgroups was evaluated and compared by Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test. Model performance was evaluated using the C-index, time-dependent AUC at 6, 12, and 24 months, calibration curves, the Brier score, and decision curve analysis, with internal validation performed via Bootstrap resampling. Results: Multivariate analysis identified male sex, ALBI grade 3, and a high ALR level as independent risk factors of poorer OS. The resulting risk model showed a C-index of 0.62. Moreover, the median OS differed significantly between the two risk groups (p < 0.001). The model displayed moderate discrimination, with AUCs of 0.66, 0.66, and 0.74 at 6, 12, and 24 months. Calibration and the Brier score showed reasonable agreement and acceptable prediction errors. No interaction between risk factors and treatment type was observed (p > 0.05), indicating model applicability to both lenvatinib and bevacizumab-based regimens. Conclusions: A prognostic model integrating sex, ALBI grade, and ALR can offer some capacity to stratify survival risk in intermediate-to-advanced HCC patients. However, its overall discriminative performance is limited, and further validation in larger and external cohorts is needed to confirm its clinical value. Full article

Background/Objectives: The integration of locoregional and systemic therapies represents a promising strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization provides durable local tumor control, while immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) improve systemic disease outcomes. This review evaluates the biological rationale, clinical evidence, and emerging role of combination Y-90 radioembolization and immunotherapy in HCC. Methods: A semi-systematic (PRISMA-informed) literature review of PubMed/MEDLINE through September 2025 was conducted, including clinical trials, retrospective and prospective studies, and translational investigations evaluating Y-90 radioembolization, immunotherapy, and their combination. Results: Preclinical and translational studies demonstrate that Y-90 radioembolization induces immunogenic cell death, enhances antigen presentation, and activates immune pathways including interferon signaling and STING-mediated responses, supporting a mechanistic basis for potential synergy with ICIs. Early clinical studies, including phase I/II trials, report objective response rates ranging from approximately 30% to 41.5% and median overall survival up to 20.9 months in selected populations. Treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events range from 10% to 25%, comparable to monotherapy approaches. However, outcomes vary across heterogeneous patient populations, and cross-trial comparisons remain limited. Ongoing prospective trials are evaluating combination strategies incorporating contemporary first-line regimens, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and the STRIDE regimen. Conclusions: Combination Y-90 radioembolization and immunotherapy demonstrates a strong biological rationale and encouraging early clinical signals, with acceptable safety profiles. However, current evidence remains preliminary and derived from non-randomized studies. Ongoing randomized trials are required to define optimal patient selection, treatment timing, and sequencing, and to establish whether combination therapy provides meaningful benefit over current standards of care. Full article

Background/Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, with incidence expected to increase. Liver transplantation is the most definitive curative option for early HCC, but many patients present beyond accepted transplant criteria, including the Milan criteria. Downstaging aims to reduce tumor burden and enable transplantation without compromising long-term outcomes. Methods: We reviewed the literature on liver transplantation, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunotherapy–locoregional therapy combinations, and immune-related adverse events in HCC. Results: Immunotherapy-based strategies are emerging as downstaging approaches in selected patients. In advanced HCC, immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations have improved objective response rates compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, reaching approximately 20–36% in pivotal phase III trials. In the downstaging setting, early data suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly with locoregional therapies, can achieve sufficient tumor regression to permit transplantation in patients initially beyond criteria. The ImmunoXXL trial reported successful downstaging and transplantation in all 16 patients treated with atezolizumab–bevacizumab, with 62.5% complete pathological responses, 2-year recurrence-free survival of 90%, and overall survival of 94%. The VITALITY study achieved successful downstaging in 75.6% of patients beyond Milan criteria, with 36.7% undergoing transplantation and 3-year post-transplant survival of 85%. However, pre-transplant immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure carries a clinically relevant risk of acute allograft rejection, reported in approximately 16–28% of transplanted patients. Conclusions: Immunotherapy-based downstaging before liver transplantation is promising but remains non-standard. Its use should be restricted to carefully selected patients within multidisciplinary protocols, as evidence remains limited by small cohorts, heterogeneous regimens, uncertain washout intervals, and rejection risk. Full article

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer, and accounts for over 800,000 deaths worldwide, making it a major global health concern. Unfortunately, despite major advances in systemic treatments, such as the introduction of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, patient objective response rates fall below 30%. HCC most commonly develops against a background of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, although single gene mutations can also drive HCC development, progression, and metastasis. Around 25% of HCC patient tumours carry mutations in TP53, the gene encoding the tumour-suppressor protein p53. p53 is a central regulator of genomic stability, cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence, and metabolic homeostasis, and its dysfunction is a frequent event in hepatocarcinogenesis. Accumulating evidence highlights the critical role of p53 in liver fibrosis, inflammation, and shaping of the HCC tumour microenvironment (TME). This review summarizes the role of p53 and its negative regulators Mdm2 and MdmX in HCC development and progression, with an emphasis on how p53 shapes the TME in favour of tumour progression. We also evaluate current and emerging p53-targeted therapeutic strategies, including Mdm2/MdmX inhibitors, mutant p53 reactivators, and rational combinations with immunotherapies. Finally, we discuss major challenges in translating p53-based therapies to the clinic, such as tumour heterogeneity, underlying liver dysfunction, and the development of therapeutic resistance. A deeper understanding of p53 biology in chronic liver disease may unlock new avenues for effective HCC prevention and treatment. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Skeletal muscle metastases are extremely rare and typically occur in advanced or poorly differentiated tumors. In selected oligometastatic cases, surgical excision can provide symptom relief and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Case Presentation: We report a 73-year-old female patient with colonic adenocarcinoma treated with right hemicolectomy and side-to-side mechanical anastomosis, followed by adjuvant CAPOX chemotherapy. The tumor was characterized by MSI-H (microsatellite instability-high) status. During adjuvant treatment (less than 6 months after surgery), she developed progressive right thigh pain, later diagnosed as an intramuscular skeletal muscle metastasis measuring approximately 16 × 13 × 8 cm. The patient underwent en bloc resection of the tumor, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy after metastasectomy. Upon disease progression, first-line chemotherapy in combination with targeted therapy (bevacizumab) was administered. Conclusions: Skeletal muscle metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma are rare. This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing atypical metastatic patterns and suggests that, in selected oligometastatic cases, surgical excision combined with a multidisciplinary approach may improve symptom control and clinical outcomes. Full article

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the distribution and longitudinal evolution of intraretinal and subretinal hyperreflective foci (HF) in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), and to examine associations between HF burden, hyperreflective material boundary remodeling (HRM-BR), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes following bevacizumab treat-and-extend therapy. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of 84 treatment-naive nAMD eyes receiving intravitreal bevacizumab via a treat-and-extend protocol. Spectral-domain OCT (Revo FC, Optopol) was performed at baseline (M0), month 3 (M3), and month 6 (M6). HF were quantified in the intraretinal and subretinal compartments using ImageJ software (version 1.54, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) by two masked graders, with inter-rater agreement assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Eyes were classified into four HRM evolution patterns following the framework of Yu et al. Primary outcome was BCVA change from M0 to M6. Multivariable linear regression was performed to assess independent predictors of BCVA change. Results: Baseline intraretinal HF counts increased significantly across HRM Patterns 1 through 4 (median 0, 6, 4, and 8, respectively; Kruskal–Wallis p < 0.001; 95% CI for Spearman r = 0.471: [0.286, 0.623]). A higher baseline intraretinal HF count correlated with worse BCVA change at M6 (r = −0.300, 95% CI [−0.483, −0.092], p_adj = 0.010). In the primary multivariable model (n = 67), both intraretinal HF burden (β = −0.449, 95% CI [−0.879, −0.020], p = 0.041) and HRM width (β = −0.003, 95% CI [−0.005, −0.001], p = 0.014) were independent predictors of BCVA change. The transient M3 intraretinal HF peak in Pattern 3 eyes (median 4 → 12 → 4) was statistically confirmed by Wilcoxon signed-rank testing (M0 → M3: p = 0.004; M3 → M6: p = 0.001). Conclusions: Intraretinal HF burden is a graded marker of HRM pattern severity and an independent predictor of visual outcomes in nAMD, alongside HRM width. The statistically validated transient M3 HF peak in Pattern 3 may represent an early OCT signal of active boundary remodeling. Full article

Background: Surgical resection remains the standard treatment for large brain metastases (LBMs), but many patients are not surgical candidates due to poor performance status or uncontrolled systemic disease. Gamma Knife-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (GKRS) has emerged as a potential alternative; however, its clinical role in this population remains insufficiently defined. We evaluated whether a uniform daily 5-fraction GKRS provides effective and safe local treatment for surgery-ineligible LBMs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients with LBMs (>14 cm³) who underwent primary hypofractionated GKRS using a uniform daily 5-fraction schedule. Forty-six patients were male; the median age was 60 years. The median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 70 (60–100); a total of 47 patients (47%) had pre-GKRS neurological deficits. The most common primary sites were lung (41), breast (24), and kidney (14). The median tumor volume was 22.0 cm³ (14–70 cm³), and the marginal dose was 35.2 Gy (50% isodose line) in 5 fractions. The primary endpoints included local tumor control (LTC), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Radiation necrosis (RN) was assessed as a key safety outcome. Results: At a median follow-up of 18 months, the overall LTC rate was 74%, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year rates of 73%, 65%, and 60%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 7.5 and 16.3 months. Higher pre-treatment KPS and absence of neurological deficits were independently associated with improved OS (p = 0.003 and 0.025, respectively). RN occurred in 16% of patients, with 9% developing symptoms; all symptomatic cases were effectively managed with corticosteroids or bevacizumab. Most tumors demonstrated substantial volumetric reduction, with a median decrease of 80% and 30% achieving near-complete response (>95%). Conclusions: A uniform daily 5-fraction hypofractionated GKRS provides effective local control with acceptable toxicity in patients with LBMs. These findings support its role as a feasible local treatment option in selected patients who are not candidates for surgery. Integration with systemic therapies and prospective validation are warranted to refine patient selection and optimize outcomes. Full article

Atezolizumab–bevacizumab is established as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on phase III randomized evidence. Although overall safety outcomes were acceptable in the registration trial, the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) and variceal bleeding remains a clinically relevant concern, particularly in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Differences between trial-based safety estimates and observational data necessitate a focused evaluation of hemorrhagic risk in this setting. Randomized trial data indicate low rates of high-grade bleeding under protocol-driven endoscopic screening and predefined eligibility criteria. In contrast, real-world cohorts report higher incidences of GI and variceal hemorrhage, especially among patients with prior bleeding, untreated or high-risk varices, reduced hepatic reserve, and extensive portal vein tumor thrombosis. Pooled analyses confirm an increased prevalence of bleeding with atezolizumab–bevacizumab compared with non-antiangiogenic systemic therapies, although event rates vary across studies due to differences in patient selection and bleeding definitions. Severe and fatal hemorrhage occurs in a minority of cases and is concentrated in clinically high-risk subgroups. Bleeding during atezolizumab–bevacizumab therapy is influenced by baseline portal hypertension severity, hepatic functional status, and tumor-related vascular involvement. Trial-derived safety data reflect outcomes under controlled conditions and may underestimate risk in broader populations. Structured baseline assessment, endoscopic evaluation, and risk-adapted portal hypertension management are integral to clinical implementation. Prospective studies incorporating standardized hemorrhage definitions and predefined risk stratification frameworks are required to refine patient selection and optimize safety in routine practice. Full article