Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (18)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = background parenchymal enhancement (BPE)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 456 KiB  
Article
From Variability to Standardization: The Impact of Breast Density on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and the Need for a Structured Reporting System
by Graziella Di Grezia, Antonio Nazzaro, Luigi Schiavone, Cisternino Elisa, Alessandro Galiano, Gatta Gianluca, Cuccurullo Vincenzo and Mariano Scaglione
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2523; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152523 - 30 Jul 2025
Viewed by 462
Abstract
Introduction: Breast density is a well-recognized factor in breast cancer risk assessment, with higher density linked to increased malignancy risk and reduced sensitivity of conventional mammography. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), observed in contrast-enhanced imaging, reflects physiological contrast uptake in non-pathologic breast tissue. [...] Read more.
Introduction: Breast density is a well-recognized factor in breast cancer risk assessment, with higher density linked to increased malignancy risk and reduced sensitivity of conventional mammography. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), observed in contrast-enhanced imaging, reflects physiological contrast uptake in non-pathologic breast tissue. While extensively characterized in breast MRI, the role of BPE in contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) remains uncertain due to inconsistent findings regarding its correlation with breast density and cancer risk. Unlike breast density—standardized through the ACR BI-RADS lexicon—BPE lacks a uniform classification system in CEM, leading to variability in clinical interpretation and research outcomes. To address this gap, we introduce the BPE-CEM Standard Scale (BCSS), a structured four-tiered classification system specifically tailored to the two-dimensional characteristics of CEM, aiming to improve consistency and diagnostic alignment in BPE evaluation. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 213 patients who underwent mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) between May 2022 and June 2023 at the “A. Perrino” Hospital in Brindisi were included. Breast density was classified according to ACR BI-RADS (categories A–D). BPE was categorized into four levels: Minimal (< 10% enhancement), Light (10–25%), Moderate (25–50%), and Marked (> 50%). Three radiologists independently assessed BPE in a subset of 50 randomly selected cases to evaluate inter-observer agreement using Cohen’s kappa. Correlations between BPE, breast density, and age were examined through regression analysis. Results: BPE was Minimal in 57% of patients, Light in 31%, Moderate in 10%, and Marked in 2%. A significant positive association was found between higher breast density (BI-RADS C–D) and increased BPE (p < 0.05), whereas lower-density breasts (A–B) were predominantly associated with minimal or light BPE. Regression analysis confirmed a modest but statistically significant association between breast density and BPE (R2 = 0.144), while age showed no significant effect. Inter-observer agreement for BPE categorization using the BCSS was excellent (κ = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78–0.92), supporting its reproducibility. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that breast density is a key determinant of BPE in CEM. The proposed BCSS offers a reproducible, four-level framework for standardized BPE assessment tailored to the imaging characteristics of CEM. By reducing variability in interpretation, the BCSS has the potential to improve diagnostic consistency and facilitate integration of BPE into personalized breast cancer risk models. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate this classification and assess its clinical impact. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2355 KiB  
Article
Role of Preoperative Breast MRI in Predicting Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer: Is There an Association with Tumor Biological Subtypes?
by Silvia Gigli, Emanuele David, Giacomo Bonito, Luisa Favale, Silvia di Sero, Antonio Vinci, Lucia Manganaro and Paolo Ricci
Biomedicines 2025, 13(6), 1364; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13061364 - 2 Jun 2025
Viewed by 559
Abstract
Introduction: A potential prognostic biomarker for predicting the response to immunotherapy in breast cancer (BC) is tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The purpose of this research is to examine if preoperative characteristics of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to predict TIL levels [...] Read more.
Introduction: A potential prognostic biomarker for predicting the response to immunotherapy in breast cancer (BC) is tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The purpose of this research is to examine if preoperative characteristics of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to predict TIL levels in a group of BC patients. In addition, we aimed to assess any potential relationship between the various tumor biology subgroups and MR imaging characteristics. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis comprised 145 participants with histologically confirmed BC who had preoperative DCE MRI. We collected and examined patient information as well as tumor MRI features, such as size and shape, edema, necrosis, multifocality/multicentricity, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. We divided patients into two groups based on their TIL levels: low-TIL (<10%) and high-TIL groups (≥10%). Following core needle biopsy, tumors were categorized as Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+, and Triple Negative using immunohistochemical analysis. TIL levels were correlated with tumor biological profiles and MRI features using both parametric and non-parametric tests. Results: Patients were categorized as having a high TIL level (≥10%; 54/145 patients) and a low TIL level (<10%; 91/145 patients) based on the median TIL level of 10%. Of the lesions, 13 were HER2-positive, 16 were Triple Negative, 49 were Luminal A, and 67 were Luminal B. Higher TIL levels were statistically correlated with TNBC (11/16 individuals, p: 0.007). ADC values (p = 0.01), BPE levels (p = 0.008), and TIL levels were all significantly negatively correlated. Significantly more homogenous enhancement was seen in tumors with elevated TIL levels (p = 0.001). The ADC values and the enhancing characteristics were the most important factors in predicting TIL levels, according to logistic regression analysis, and when combined, they demonstrated the strongest ability to distinguish between the two groups (AUC = 0.744). Conclusions: MRI features, particularly ADC values and enhancement characteristics, may play a pivotal role in the assessment of TIL levels in BC before surgery. This could help patients to better customize treatments to the features of their tumors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging Technology for Human Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1742 KiB  
Article
Influence of Breast Density and Menopausal Status on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis
by Luca Nicosia, Luciano Mariano, Carmen Mallardi, Adriana Sorce, Samuele Frassoni, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Cristian Gialain, Filippo Pesapane, Claudia Sangalli and Enrico Cassano
Cancers 2025, 17(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17010011 - 24 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 962
Abstract
Background: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has recently gained recognition as an effective alternative to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing breast lesions, offering both morphological and functional imaging capabilities. However, the phenomenon of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) remains a critical consideration, as it [...] Read more.
Background: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has recently gained recognition as an effective alternative to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing breast lesions, offering both morphological and functional imaging capabilities. However, the phenomenon of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) remains a critical consideration, as it can affect the interpretation of images by obscuring or mimicking lesions. While the impact of BPE has been well-documented in MRI, limited data are available regarding the factors influencing BPE in CEM and its relationship with breast cancer (BC) characteristics. Materials: This retrospective study included 116 patients with confirmed invasive BC who underwent CEM prior to biopsy and surgery. Data collected included patient age, breast density, receptor status, tumor grading, and the Ki-67 proliferation index. BPE was evaluated by two radiologists using the 2022 ACR BI-RADS lexicon for CEM. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between BPE, patient demographics, and tumor characteristics. Results: The study found a significant association between higher levels of BPE and specific patient characteristics. In particular, increased BPE was more commonly observed in patients with higher breast density (p < 0.001) and those who were pre-menopausal (p = 0.029). Among patients categorized under density level B, the majority exhibited minimal BPE, while those in categories C and D showed progressively higher levels of BPE, indicating a clear trend correlating higher breast density with increased enhancement. Additionally, pre-menopausal patients demonstrated a higher likelihood of moderate to marked BPE compared to post-menopausal patients. Despite these significant associations, the analysis did not reveal a meaningful correlation between BPE intensity and tumor subtypes (p = 0.77) or tumor grade (p = 0.73). The inter-reader agreement for BPE assessment was substantial, as indicated by a weighted kappa of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68–0.89), demonstrating consistent evaluation between radiologists. Conclusions: These findings suggest that BPE in CEM is influenced by factors like breast density and age, aligning with patterns observed in MRI studies. However, BPE intensity was not associated with tumor subtypes or grades, indicating a poorer prognosis. These insights highlight the potential of BPE as a risk biomarker in preventive follow-up, particularly for patients with high breast density and pre-menopausal status. Further multicentric and prospective studies are needed to validate these results and deepen the understanding of BPE’s role in CEM diagnostics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1824 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Breast Cancer Risk in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: Evaluating Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Radiotherapy-Induced Toxicity
by Filomena Emanuela Laddaga, Michele Telegrafo, Carmela Garzillo, Alba Fiorentino, Angela Sardaro, Stefano Martinotti, Marco Moschetta and Francesco Gaudio
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 4091; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234091 - 6 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1876
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment has dramatically improved, with high survival rates in early stages. However, long-term survivors face an increased risk of secondary cancers, particularly breast cancer (BC), which emerge as a leading cause of mortality decades after therapy. Background/Objectives: This study [...] Read more.
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment has dramatically improved, with high survival rates in early stages. However, long-term survivors face an increased risk of secondary cancers, particularly breast cancer (BC), which emerge as a leading cause of mortality decades after therapy. Background/Objectives: This study explores the risk of BC and the toxic effects of radiation therapy (RT) in long-term HL survivors compared to age-matched high-risk women, including BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. A prospective study was conducted on 62 women who had undergone chemotherapy and involved-field RT for HL, with MRI used to assess breast tissue changes. This study’s primary endpoint was to analyze BC incidence in HL survivors, while secondary objectives focused on the analysis of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) in irradiated areas. Results: The findings revealed a 5% incidence of BC in HL survivors, with 50% showing moderate or marked BPE, similar to that observed in high-risk BC controls. No significant differences in BPE distribution were found between the two groups. Conclusions: The study highlights the long-term risk of BC in HL survivors and suggests that advanced RT techniques and targeted therapies may help reduce the incidence of secondary tumors. Future research should focus on understanding the genetic and biological mechanisms behind treatment-induced cancers Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiation Therapy in Lymphoma)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 595 KiB  
Review
Machine Learning Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast Cancer and Clinical Applications: A Literature Review
by Katie S. Duong, Rhianna Rubner, Adam Siegel, Richard Adam, Richard Ha and Takouhie Maldjian
Cancers 2024, 16(21), 3681; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213681 - 31 Oct 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1553
Abstract
Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI holds promise as an imaging biomarker for breast cancer risk and prognosis. The ability to identify those at greatest risk can inform clinical decisions, promoting early diagnosis and potentially guiding strategies for prevention such as risk-reduction [...] Read more.
Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI holds promise as an imaging biomarker for breast cancer risk and prognosis. The ability to identify those at greatest risk can inform clinical decisions, promoting early diagnosis and potentially guiding strategies for prevention such as risk-reduction interventions with the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors. Currently, the standard method of assessing BPE is based on the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), which involves a radiologist’s qualitative categorization of BPE as minimal, mild, moderate, or marked on contrast-enhanced MRI. This approach can be subjective and prone to inter/intra-observer variability, and compromises accuracy and reproducibility. In addition, this approach limits qualitative assessment to 4 categories. More recently developed methods using machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) techniques have the potential to quantify BPE more accurately and objectively. This paper will review the current machine learning/AI methods to determine BPE, and the clinical applications of BPE as an imaging biomarker for breast cancer risk prediction and prognosis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2835 KiB  
Article
Factors Influencing Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Images
by Daniel Wessling, Simon Männlin, Ricarda Schwarz, Florian Hagen, Andreas Brendlin, Sebastian Gassenmaier and Heike Preibsch
Diagnostics 2024, 14(19), 2239; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192239 - 8 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1214
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and various patient-related and technical factors in recombined contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images. Material and Methods: We assessed CESM images from 62 female patients who underwent CESM [...] Read more.
Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and various patient-related and technical factors in recombined contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images. Material and Methods: We assessed CESM images from 62 female patients who underwent CESM between May 2017 and October 2019, focusing on factors influencing BPE. A total of 235 images, all acquired using the same mammography machine, were analyzed. A region of interest (ROI) with a standard size of 0.75 to 1 cm2 was used to evaluate the minimal, maximal, and average pixel intensity enhancement. Additionally, the images were qualitatively assessed on a scale from 1 (minimal BPE) to 4 (marked BPE). We examined correlations with body mass index (BMI), age, hematocrit, hemoglobin levels, cardiovascular conditions, and the amount of pressure applied during the examination. Results: Our study identified a significant correlation between the amount of pressure applied during the examination and the BPE (Spearman’s ρ = 0.546). Additionally, a significant but weak correlation was observed between BPE and BMI (Spearman’s ρ = 0.421). No significant associations were found between BPE and menopausal status, cardiovascular preconditions, hematocrit, hemoglobin levels, breast density, or age. Conclusions: Patient-related and procedural factors significantly influence BPE in CESM images. Specifically, increased applied pressure and BMI are associated with higher BPE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Precision in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1925 KiB  
Article
Explainable Precision Medicine in Breast MRI: A Combined Radiomics and Deep Learning Approach for the Classification of Contrast Agent Uptake
by Sylwia Nowakowska, Karol Borkowski, Carlotta Ruppert, Patryk Hejduk, Alexander Ciritsis, Anna Landsmann, Magda Marcon, Nicole Berger, Andreas Boss and Cristina Rossi
Bioengineering 2024, 11(6), 556; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11060556 - 31 May 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1577
Abstract
In DCE-MRI, the degree of contrast uptake in normal fibroglandular tissue, i.e., background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), is a crucial biomarker linked to breast cancer risk and treatment outcome. In accordance with the Breast Imaging Reporting & Data System (BI-RADS), it should be visually [...] Read more.
In DCE-MRI, the degree of contrast uptake in normal fibroglandular tissue, i.e., background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), is a crucial biomarker linked to breast cancer risk and treatment outcome. In accordance with the Breast Imaging Reporting & Data System (BI-RADS), it should be visually classified into four classes. The susceptibility of such an assessment to inter-reader variability highlights the urgent need for a standardized classification algorithm. In this retrospective study, the first post-contrast subtraction images for 27 healthy female subjects were included. The BPE was classified slice-wise by two expert radiologists. The extraction of radiomic features from segmented BPE was followed by dataset splitting and dimensionality reduction. The latent representations were then utilized as inputs to a deep neural network classifying BPE into BI-RADS classes. The network’s predictions were elucidated at the radiomic feature level with Shapley values. The deep neural network achieved a BPE classification accuracy of 84 ± 2% (p-value < 0.00001). Most of the misclassifications involved adjacent classes. Different radiomic features were decisive for the prediction of each BPE class underlying the complexity of the decision boundaries. A highly precise and explainable pipeline for BPE classification was achieved without user- or algorithm-dependent radiomic feature selection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Breast Cancer Imaging)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 838 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between Classic and Modified Abbreviated Breast MRI and the MRI Features Affecting Their Diagnostic Performance
by Subin Lee, Eun Jung Choi, Hyemi Choi and Jung Hee Byon
Diagnostics 2024, 14(3), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14030282 - 27 Jan 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1468
Abstract
Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) has emerged as a supplementary screening tool, though protocols have not been standardized. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of modified and classic AB-MRI and determine MRI features affecting their diagnostic performance. [...] Read more.
Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) has emerged as a supplementary screening tool, though protocols have not been standardized. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of modified and classic AB-MRI and determine MRI features affecting their diagnostic performance. Classic AB-MRI included one pre- and two post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) scans, while modified AB-MRI included a delayed post-contrast axial T1WI scan and an axial T2-weighted interpolated scan obtained between the second and third post-contrast T1WI scans. Four radiologists (two specialists and two non-specialists) independently categorized the lesions. The MRI features investigated were lesion size, lesion type, and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher’s exact test, and bootstrap-based test were used for statistical analysis. The average area under the curve (AUC) for modified AB-MRI was significantly greater than that for classic AB-MRI (0.76 vs. 0.70, p = 0.010) in all reader evaluations, with a similar trend in specialist evaluations (0.83 vs. 0.76, p = 0.004). Modified AB-MRI demonstrated increased AUCs and better diagnostic performance than classic AB-MRI, especially for lesion size > 10 mm (p = 0.018) and mass lesion type (p = 0.014) in specialist evaluations and lesion size > 10 mm (p = 0.003) and mild (p = 0.026) or moderate BPE (p = 0.010) in non-specialist evaluations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Precision in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 680 KiB  
Article
How Does Diagnostic Accuracy Evolve with Increased Breast MRI Experience?
by Tong Wu, Afsaneh Alikhassi and Belinda Curpen
Tomography 2023, 9(6), 2067-2078; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9060162 - 6 Nov 2023
Viewed by 2684
Abstract
Introduction: Our institution is part of a provincial program providing annual breast MRI screenings to high-risk women. We assessed how MRI experience, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) affect the biopsy-proven predictive value (PPV3) and accuracy for detecting [...] Read more.
Introduction: Our institution is part of a provincial program providing annual breast MRI screenings to high-risk women. We assessed how MRI experience, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), and the amount of fibroglandular tissue (FGT) affect the biopsy-proven predictive value (PPV3) and accuracy for detecting suspicious MRI findings. Methods: From all high-risk screening breast MRIs conducted between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2020, we reviewed all BI-RADS 4/5 observations with pathological tissue diagnoses. Overall and annual PPV3s were computed. Radiologists with fewer than ten observations were excluded from performance analyses. PPV3s were computed for each radiologist. We assessed how MRI experience, BPE, and FGT impacted diagnostic accuracy using logistic regression analyses, defining positive cases as malignancies alone (definition A) or malignant or high-risk lesions (definition B). Findings: There were 536 BI-RADS 4/5 observations with tissue diagnoses, including 77 malignant and 51 high-risk lesions. A total of 516 observations were included in the radiologist performance analyses. The average radiologist’s PPV3 was 16 ± 6% (definition A) and 25 ± 8% (definition B). MRI experience in years correlated significantly with positive cases (definition B, OR = 1.05, p = 0.03), independent of BPE or FGT. Diagnostic accuracy improved exponentially with increased MRI experience (definition B, OR of 1.27 and 1.61 for 5 and 10 years, respectively, p = 0.03 for both). Lower levels of BPE significantly correlated with increased odds of findings being malignant, independent of FGT and MRI experience. Summary: More extensive MRI reading experience improves radiologists’ diagnostic accuracy for high-risk or malignant lesions, even in MRI studies with increased BPE. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Imaging)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 17628 KiB  
Article
AI-Based Cancer Detection Model for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
by Clément Jailin, Sara Mohamed, Razvan Iordache, Pablo Milioni De Carvalho, Salwa Yehia Ahmed, Engy Abdullah Abdel Sattar, Amr Farouk Ibrahim Moustafa, Mohammed Mohammed Gomaa, Rashaa Mohammed Kamal and Laurence Vancamberg
Bioengineering 2023, 10(8), 974; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10080974 - 17 Aug 2023
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3201
Abstract
Background: The recent development of deep neural network models for the analysis of breast images has been a breakthrough in computer-aided diagnostics (CAD). Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a recent mammography modality providing anatomical and functional imaging of the breast. Despite the clinical benefits [...] Read more.
Background: The recent development of deep neural network models for the analysis of breast images has been a breakthrough in computer-aided diagnostics (CAD). Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a recent mammography modality providing anatomical and functional imaging of the breast. Despite the clinical benefits it could bring, only a few research studies have been conducted around deep-learning (DL) based CAD for CEM, especially because the access to large databases is still limited. This study presents the development and evaluation of a CEM-CAD for enhancing lesion detection and breast classification. Materials & Methods: A deep learning enhanced cancer detection model based on a YOLO architecture has been optimized and trained on a large CEM dataset of 1673 patients (7443 images) with biopsy-proven lesions from various hospitals and acquisition systems. The evaluation was conducted using metrics derived from the free receiver operating characteristic (FROC) for the lesion detection and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to evaluate the overall breast classification performance. The performances were evaluated for different types of image input and for each patient background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) level. Results: The optimized model achieved an area under the curve (AUROC) of 0.964 for breast classification. Using both low-energy and recombined image as inputs for the DL model shows greater performance than using only the recombined image. For the lesion detection, the model was able to detect 90% of all cancers with a false positive (non-cancer) rate of 0.128 per image. This study demonstrates a high impact of BPE on classification and detection performance. Conclusion: The developed CEM CAD outperforms previously published papers and its performance is comparable to radiologist-reported classification and detection capability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning Techniques to Diagnose Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 8429 KiB  
Article
The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Based on Maximum-Intensity Projection in Young Patients with Marked Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI
by Ga-Eun Park, Bong-Joo Kang, Sung-hun Kim and Na-Young Jung
Life 2023, 13(8), 1744; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081744 - 14 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1829
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) utilizing maximum-intensity projection (MIP) was suggested as a cost-effective alternative tool without the risk of gadolinium-based contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether DWI MIPs played a supportive role in young (≤60) patients with marked background [...] Read more.
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) utilizing maximum-intensity projection (MIP) was suggested as a cost-effective alternative tool without the risk of gadolinium-based contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether DWI MIPs played a supportive role in young (≤60) patients with marked background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI). The research included 1303 patients with varying degrees of BPE, and correlations between BPE on CE-MRI, the background diffusion signal (BDS) on DWI, and clinical parameters were analyzed. Lesion detection scores were compared between CE-MRI and DWI, with DWI showing higher scores. Among the 186 lesions in 181 patients with marked BPE on CE-MRI, the main lesion on MIPs of CE-MRI was partially or completely seen in 88.7% of cases, while it was not seen in 11.3% of cases. On the other hand, the main lesion on MIPs of DWI was seen in 91.4% of cases, with only 8.6% of cases showing no visibility. DWI achieved higher scores for lesion detection compared to CE-MRI. The presence of a marked BDS was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of a higher DWI score (p < 0.001), and non-mass lesions were associated with a decreased likelihood of a higher DWI score compared with mass lesions (p = 0.196). In conclusion, the inclusion of MIPs of DWI in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer patients, particularly young women with marked BPE, proved highly beneficial in improving the overall diagnostic process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1658 KiB  
Article
Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM) Enhancing Asymmetry: Single-Center First Case Analysis
by Giuliano Migliaro, Giulia Bicchierai, Pietro Valente, Federica Di Naro, Diego De Benedetto, Francesco Amato, Cecilia Boeri, Ermanno Vanzi, Vittorio Miele and Jacopo Nori
Diagnostics 2023, 13(6), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061011 - 7 Mar 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3412
Abstract
(1) Purpose: The latest Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon for CEM introduced a new descriptor, enhancing asymmetries (EAs). The purpose of this study was to determine which types of lesions were correlated with EAs. (2) Methods: A total of 3359 [...] Read more.
(1) Purpose: The latest Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon for CEM introduced a new descriptor, enhancing asymmetries (EAs). The purpose of this study was to determine which types of lesions were correlated with EAs. (2) Methods: A total of 3359 CEM exams, executed at AOUC Careggi in Florence, Italy between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively assessed by two radiologists. For each of the EAs found, the size, the enhancing conspicuity (degree of enhancement relative to background described as low, moderate, or high), whether there was a corresponding finding in the traditional radiology images (US or mammography), the biopsy results when performed including any follow-up exams, and the presence of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of the normal breast tissue (minimal, mild, moderate, marked) were described. (3) Results: A total of 64 women were included, 36 of them underwent CEM for a preoperative staging assessment, and 28 for a problem-solving examination. Among the 64 EAs, 19/64 (29.69%) resulted in being category B5 (B5) lesions, 5/64 (7.81%) as category B3 (B3) lesions, and 40/64(62.50%) were negative or benign either after biopsy or second-look exams or follow-up. We assessed that EAs with higher enhancing conspicuity correlated significantly with a higher risk of B5 lesions (p: 0.0071), especially bigger ones (p: 0.0274). Conclusions: EAs can relate both with benign and tumoral lesions, and they need to be assessed as the other CEM descriptors, with re-evaluation of low-energy images and second-look exams, particularly larger EAs with higher enhancing conspicuity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Breast Cancer Imaging and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2073 KiB  
Article
Multiparametric MRI Features of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes
by Madalina Szep, Roxana Pintican, Bianca Boca, Andra Perja, Magdalena Duma, Diana Feier, Bogdan Fetica, Dan Eniu, Sorin Marian Dudea and Angelica Chiorean
Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1716; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121716 - 23 Nov 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3194
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) molecular subtypes have unique incidence, survival and response to therapy. There are five BC subtypes described by immunohistochemistry: luminal A, luminal B HER2 positive and HER2 negative, triple negative (TNBC) and HER2-enriched. Multiparametric breast MRI (magnetic [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) molecular subtypes have unique incidence, survival and response to therapy. There are five BC subtypes described by immunohistochemistry: luminal A, luminal B HER2 positive and HER2 negative, triple negative (TNBC) and HER2-enriched. Multiparametric breast MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) provides morphological and functional characteristics of breast tumours and is nowadays recommended in the preoperative setting. Aim: To evaluate the multiparametric MRI features (T2-WI, ADC values and DCE) of breast tumours along with breast density and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) features among different BC molecular subtypes. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study which included 344 patients. All underwent multiparametric breast MRI (T2WI, ADC and DCE sequences) and features were extracted according to the latest BIRADS lexicon. The inter-reader agreement was assessed using the intraclass coefficient (ICC) between the ROI of ADC obtained from the two breast imagers (experienced and moderately experienced). Results: The study population was divided as follows: 89 (26%) with luminal A, 39 (11.5%) luminal B HER2 positive, 168 (48.5%) luminal B HER2 negative, 41 (12%) triple negative (TNBC) and 7 (2%) with HER2 enriched. Luminal A tumours were associated with special histology type, smallest tumour size and persistent kinetic curve (all p-values < 0.05). Luminal B HER2 negative tumours were associated with lowest ADC value (0.77 × 10−3 mm2/s2), which predicts the BC molecular subtype with an accuracy of 0.583. TNBC were associated with asymmetric and moderate/marked BPE, round/oval masses with circumscribed margins and rim enhancement (all p-values < 0.05). HER2 enriched BC were associated with the largest tumour size (mean 37.28 mm, p-value = 0.02). Conclusions: BC molecular subtypes can be associated with T2WI, ADC and DCE MRI features. ADC can help predict the luminal B HER2 negative cases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2521 KiB  
Article
Post-Processing Bias Field Inhomogeneity Correction for Assessing Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Quantitative Marker of Treatment Response
by Alex Anh-Tu Nguyen, Natsuko Onishi, Julia Carmona-Bozo, Wen Li, John Kornak, David C. Newitt and Nola M. Hylton
Tomography 2022, 8(2), 891-904; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8020072 - 22 Mar 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3486
Abstract
Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of breast fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown an association with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer. Fully automated segmentation of FGT for BPE calculation is a challenge [...] Read more.
Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) of breast fibroglandular tissue (FGT) in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown an association with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer. Fully automated segmentation of FGT for BPE calculation is a challenge when image artifacts are present. Low spatial frequency intensity nonuniformity due to coil sensitivity variations is known as bias or inhomogeneity and can affect FGT segmentation and subsequent BPE measurement. In this study, we utilized the N4ITK algorithm for bias correction over a restricted bilateral breast volume and compared the contralateral FGT segmentations based on uncorrected and bias-corrected images in three MRI examinations at pre-treatment, early treatment and inter-regimen timepoints during NAC. A retrospective analysis of 2 cohorts was performed: one with 735 patients enrolled in the multi-center I-SPY 2 TRIAL and the sub-cohort of 340 patients meeting a high-quality benchmark for segmentation. Bias correction substantially increased the FGT segmentation quality for 6.3–8.0% of examinations, while it substantially decreased the quality for no examination. Our results showed improvement in segmentation quality and a small but statistically significant increase in the resulting BPE measurement after bias correction at all timepoints in both cohorts. Continuing studies are examining the effects on pCR prediction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantitative Imaging Network)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 1280 KiB  
Article
Differentiating Breast Tumors from Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: The Role of Radiomics—A Pilot Reader Study
by Ioana Boca (Bene), Anca Ileana Ciurea, Cristiana Augusta Ciortea, Paul Andrei Ștefan, Lorena Alexandra Lisencu and Sorin Marian Dudea
Diagnostics 2021, 11(7), 1248; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11071248 - 13 Jul 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 2651
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in discriminating between breast cancers and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE). Methods: This retrospective study included 38 patients that underwent CESM examinations for clinical [...] Read more.
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in discriminating between breast cancers and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE). Methods: This retrospective study included 38 patients that underwent CESM examinations for clinical purposes between January 2019–December 2020. A total of 57 malignant breast lesions and 23 CESM examinations with 31 regions of BPE were assessed through radiomic analysis using MaZda software. The parameters that demonstrated to be independent predictors for breast malignancy were exported into the B11 program and a k-nearest neighbor classifier (k-NN) was trained on the initial groups of patients and was tested using a validation group. Histopathology results obtained after surgery were considered the gold standard. Results: Radiomic analysis found WavEnLL_s_2 parameter as an independent predictor for breast malignancies with a sensitivity of 68.42% and a specificity of 83.87%. The prediction model that included CH1D6SumAverg, CN4D6Correlat, Kurtosis, Perc01, Perc10, Skewness, and WavEnLL_s_2 parameters had a sensitivity of 73.68% and a specificity of 80.65%. Higher values were obtained of WavEnLL_s_2 and the prediction model for tumors than for BPEs. The comparison between the ROC curves provided by the WaveEnLL_s_2 and the entire prediction model did not show statistically significant results (p = 0.0943). The k-NN classifier based on the parameter WavEnLL_s_2 had a sensitivity and specificity on training and validating groups of 71.93% and 45.16% vs. 60% and 44.44%, respectively. Conclusion: Radiomic analysis has the potential to differentiate CESM between malignant lesions and BPE. Further quantitative insight into parenchymal enhancement patterns should be performed to facilitate the role of BPE in personalized clinical decision-making and risk assessment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multimodality Breast Imaging 2021)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop