Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (11)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 607 KB  
Article
Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes Across Different Malignancies in Women Undergoing Fertility Preservation: The Role of AMH and AFC in Predicting Ovarian Response
by Loris Marin, Eleonora Targhetta, Federica Esposito, Guido Ambrosini and Alessandra Andrisani
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(13), 5144; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15135144 - 1 Jul 2026
Viewed by 309
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Fertility preservation is a key component of cancer care in women of reproductive age, and controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) followed by oocyte/embryo cryopreservation is considered the standard strategy. Although COS protocols are generally standardized, systemic effects related to different malignancies may [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Fertility preservation is a key component of cancer care in women of reproductive age, and controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) followed by oocyte/embryo cryopreservation is considered the standard strategy. Although COS protocols are generally standardized, systemic effects related to different malignancies may interfere with ovarian reserve assessment and influence stimulation planning and counselling. This study aimed to evaluate COS outcomes across different malignancy types in women undergoing fertility preservation. Methods: This retrospective study included 331 oncological patients who underwent COS for fertility preservation at a single referral center between May 2008 and May 2025. Patients were stratified into three groups according to malignancy type: breast cancer, hematological malignancies, and other cancers. Ovarian reserve was assessed using serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC). COS outcomes, including stimulation duration, total gonadotropin dose, number of retrieved and mature oocytes, follicular output rate (FORT), and follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI), were compared among groups. Results: Patients with hematological malignancies were significantly younger and showed higher AFC values compared with the other groups, whereas AMH levels did not differ significantly. After adjustment for age and AFC, patients with hematological malignancies showed significantly lower AMH levels compared with breast cancer patients (β = −0.94 ng/mL, 95% CI −1.40 to −0.48, p < 0.001), supporting the presence of a relative AMH–AFC discordance. In unadjusted analyses, gonadotropin requirements were higher in breast cancer patients, whereas the number of retrieved and mature oocytes was higher in patients with hematological malignancies. However, after adjustment for age and AFC, malignancy type was not independently associated with retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, total gonadotropin dose, or stimulation duration. FORT and FOI were comparable among groups. Conclusions: Malignancy type did not appear to independently impair ovarian responsiveness to stimulation. Patients with hematological malignancies showed preserved stimulation outcomes despite AMH values not being proportionally higher than expected based on their younger age and higher AFC. These findings suggest that AMH should be interpreted with caution in systemic malignancies and that AFC may be particularly useful for tailoring fertility preservation counselling and stimulation strategies when AMH and AFC are discordant. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Reproductive Medicine & Andrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 374 KB  
Review
Beyond Survival: Integrating Fertility Preservation into Gynaecologic Cancer Management
by Christina Pappa, Muhammad Fatum, Haya Nasser, Umniah Khajori, Danielle Christmas, Nouf Khalifeh, Mohammad Daas and Moiad Alazzam
Reprod. Med. 2026, 7(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed7020022 - 13 May 2026
Viewed by 1295
Abstract
As survival rates among patients with gynaecological cancers continue to improve, fertility preservation has become an increasingly important aspect of comprehensive cancer care, particularly for younger women diagnosed during their reproductive years. The impact of treatment on fertility varies according to cancer type, [...] Read more.
As survival rates among patients with gynaecological cancers continue to improve, fertility preservation has become an increasingly important aspect of comprehensive cancer care, particularly for younger women diagnosed during their reproductive years. The impact of treatment on fertility varies according to cancer type, stage, and modality, necessitating individualised preservation strategies. Fertility preservation is both feasible and safe in carefully selected patients with early-stage gynaecological cancers. Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation remain the most widely accepted techniques, particularly when time allows for ovarian stimulation. Fertility-sparing surgeries, such as radical trachelectomy and conservative management of early endometrial cancer, have shown promising oncological and reproductive outcomes. However, barriers including access, timing, and awareness continue to limit broader implementation. In modern society, fertility-preserving strategies should form an integral part of treatment planning for reproductive-aged women with gynaecological malignancies. Early referral to a fertility specialist, patient-centred counselling, and a coordinated multidisciplinary approach are essential to optimise both oncological and reproductive outcomes. Further research and education are required to refine guidelines and expand access to fertility-preserving care. This review presents the current fertility preservation options available to women with gynaecological cancers, including cervical, ovarian, and endometrial malignancies, and highlights the importance of early multidisciplinary intervention in delivering personalised care. Full article
19 pages, 819 KB  
Review
Fertility Preservation Strategies in Female Cancer Patients: Current Approaches and Future Directions
by Nicolae Gică, Ioana Vișoiu, Ioana-Catalina Mocanu, Ancuța Năstac, Romina Marina Sima, Anca Maria Panaitescu and Claudia Mehedințu
Medicina 2025, 61(10), 1794; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101794 - 4 Oct 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3148
Abstract
Fertility-sparing treatments (FSTs) have gained importance for young female cancer patients, especially those with early-stage cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. However, concerns about the long-term safety of these procedures, particularly in more advanced cancers, persist. A literature review was conducted using databases such [...] Read more.
Fertility-sparing treatments (FSTs) have gained importance for young female cancer patients, especially those with early-stage cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. However, concerns about the long-term safety of these procedures, particularly in more advanced cancers, persist. A literature review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search terms included “fertility preservation” and “gynaecological cancer”. Articles published between 2014 and 2024 were considered, with 39 articles cited in the paper. The inclusion criteria were female patients undergoing FST. Studies were excluded if prior treatments impacted fertility or if oncological outcomes were inadequately reported. Radical trachelectomy, laparoscopic fertility-sparing surgeries, and cryopreservation techniques, such as ovarian tissue vitrification and oocyte cryopreservation, offer viable options for preserving fertility in early-stage gynecological cancer patients. Radical trachelectomy and cryopreservation showed positive reproductive outcomes, with pregnancy rates of 30–50% in early-stage cases. GnRH analogs during chemotherapy also demonstrated benefits in maintaining fertility. Despite these advances, recurrence in more advanced stages (FIGO IA2 and beyond) remains a concern. Minimally invasive surgeries like robotic-assisted procedures demonstrated comparable fertility outcomes to traditional methods but with fewer complications. FST is a promising option for women with early-stage cancer, offering favorable reproductive and survival outcomes. However, further research is needed to confirm long-term oncological safety in advanced stages. Multidisciplinary approaches and individualized treatment planning are essential for optimizing outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Conception to Birth: Embryonic Development and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 468 KB  
Article
Age-Based Oocyte Yield in Elective Oocyte Cryopreservation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Ronit Machtinger, Atalia Tuval, Ariel Hammerman, Ettie Maman, Ravit Nahum, Raoul Orvieto, Meirav Noah Hirsh, Adva Aizer and Tomer Ziv Baran
Diagnostics 2025, 15(17), 2278; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15172278 - 8 Sep 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2907
Abstract
Background: Demand for elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC) among healthy women delaying childbearing is rising worldwide. Yet, clinicians and patients often rely on limited or indirect evidence to predict age-specific mature oocyte yield. Robust, real-world benchmarks are needed to guide expectations, estimate live birth [...] Read more.
Background: Demand for elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC) among healthy women delaying childbearing is rising worldwide. Yet, clinicians and patients often rely on limited or indirect evidence to predict age-specific mature oocyte yield. Robust, real-world benchmarks are needed to guide expectations, estimate live birth potential, and optimize treatment planning. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 400 healthy women aged 30–41 undergoing their first elective OC cycle between 2019 and 2023 at a large, university-affiliated fertility center. Exclusion criteria included infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, prior ovarian surgery, and other medical indications for OC. All cycles used a standardized GnRH antagonist protocol with an initial gonadotropin dose of 300 IU/day. Only mature (metaphase II) oocytes were cryopreserved. Age-specific percentiles for total and mature oocyte yield were modeled using the General Additive Model for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS), and nomograms were developed. Results: Mean age was 35.7 years (SD 2.3). Median total and mature oocytes retrieved were 13 (IQR 9–19) and 10 (IQR 7–15), respectively. At the 50th percentile, women aged 30, 35, and 40 yielded 20, 14, and 9 total oocytes, with 15, 11, and 6 mature oocytes cryopreserved. Nomograms across percentiles illustrated a consistent, progressive decline in yield with advancing age. Conclusions: Age-based nomograms derived from real-world data can offer a clinically relevant tool to estimate the likely oocyte yield per cycle. They can help set realistic expectations, guide the number of cycles needed to meet fertility goals, and support evidence-based, shared decision-making in elective OC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 813 KB  
Review
Beyond Earth, Beyond Time: Preserving Female Fertility in Space Missions
by Loris Marin, Luciana Bordin, Chiara Sabbadin, Guido Ambrosini and Alessandra Andrisani
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(17), 5975; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14175975 - 24 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2639
Abstract
The number of female astronauts participating in space missions is increasing, and concerns about the impact of spaceflight on reproductive health have emerged. Space radiation and microgravity pose potential threats to ovarian reserve and uterine function, but data on human female reproductive health [...] Read more.
The number of female astronauts participating in space missions is increasing, and concerns about the impact of spaceflight on reproductive health have emerged. Space radiation and microgravity pose potential threats to ovarian reserve and uterine function, but data on human female reproductive health in space remain scarce. This review explores current evidence from both real and simulated space conditions, including animal studies and ground-based cosmic radiation models. The relevant literature on cosmic radiation, fertility preservation strategies, and gynecological risk management in spaceflight was analyzed to provide a comprehensive synthesis. Space radiation might damage ovarian follicles and impair folliculogenesis, potentially leading to premature ovarian failure and microgravity might alter endocrine function. While human data are lacking, murine and in vitro model studies suggest significant reproductive risks. Embryo/oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are currently the most viable fertility preservation strategies. Shielding technologies, radioprotective agents, and hormonal modulation may offer adjunct protection. In conclusions, fertility counseling and preservation should become integral to pre-mission planning for female astronauts of reproductive age. A personalized approach, accounting for individual reproductive goals, age and mission duration, is essential. Further research is urgently needed to understand the reproductive effects of deep space travel and to develop targeted protective strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges in Reproductive Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 603 KB  
Case Report
First Successful Fertility Preservation Using Oocyte Vitrification in Patient with Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy-Candidiasis-Ectodermal Dystrophy
by Yuka Tanaka, Bunpei Ishizuka and Kazuhiro Kawamura
Endocrines 2025, 6(3), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/endocrines6030031 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1448
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) is a rare autoimmune disorder caused by mutations in the AIRE gene. Approximately 60% of affected females develop premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) by age 30, often most commonly due to steroidogenic autoantibodies. Although APECED is typically diagnosed in [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) is a rare autoimmune disorder caused by mutations in the AIRE gene. Approximately 60% of affected females develop premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) by age 30, often most commonly due to steroidogenic autoantibodies. Although APECED is typically diagnosed in childhood, its reproductive implications are underrecognized. This study reports a case of successful fertility preservation in an adult woman with APECED and reviews the relevant literature. Methods: We describe the clinical course of a 37-year-old woman with genetically confirmed APECED who underwent ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation. A comprehensive PubMed search was also conducted to identify English-language case reports on fertility preservation in APECED-associated POI. Results: The patient experienced menarche at age 13, adrenal insufficiency at 14, and menstrual irregularities from age 18. Genetic analysis confirmed an AIRE mutation (NM_000383: exon 11: c.1400+1G>A). Given her relatively high anti-Müllerian hormone level, she opted for fertility preservation and underwent six cycles of ovarian stimulation, resulting in the cryopreservation of 17 mature oocytes. During ovarian stimulation, multiple follicular developments were observed, but serum E2 levels remained low. The literature review identified fewer than 20 reported cases addressing fertility preservation in APECED, highlighting its rarity and the lack of standardized management. Conclusions: Although APECED frequently leads to early POI due to impaired steroidogenesis, residual ovarian function may persist. Early assessment of ovarian reserve and timely fertility counseling are crucial, even in asymptomatic patients or those diagnosed in childhood. Reproductive planning should be integrated into the long-term care of women with APECED. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 513 KB  
Review
Oocyte Cryopreservation for Medical and Planned Indications: A Practical Guide and Overview
by Eric Han and David B. Seifer
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3542; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103542 - 18 May 2023
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 9715
Abstract
Oocyte cryopreservation (OC) is the process in which ovarian follicles are stimulated, the follicular fluid is retrieved, and mature oocytes are isolated and vitrified. Since the first successful pregnancy utilizing previously cryopreserved oocytes in 1986, OC has become increasingly utilized as an option [...] Read more.
Oocyte cryopreservation (OC) is the process in which ovarian follicles are stimulated, the follicular fluid is retrieved, and mature oocytes are isolated and vitrified. Since the first successful pregnancy utilizing previously cryopreserved oocytes in 1986, OC has become increasingly utilized as an option for future biologic children in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies, such as for the treatment of cancer. Planned OC, also termed elective OC, is growing in popularity as a means to circumvent age-related fertility decline. In this narrative review, we describe both medically indicated and planned OC, focusing on the physiology of ovarian follicular loss, OC technique and risks, timing of when OC should be performed, associated financial considerations, and outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fertility Preservation: Recent Developments and New Insights)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 944 KB  
Case Report
Embryo Cryopreservation in a Patient with Sickle Cell Disease Utilizing Letrozole and Enoxaparin: A Case Report
by Stephanie J. Gunderson, Nina Snowden and Joshua J. Field
Hematol. Rep. 2023, 15(1), 101-107; https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep15010011 - 3 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2462
Abstract
Purpose: To describe a patient with sickle cell disease, a prothrombotic disorder, who underwent successful embryo cryopreservation for the purposes of fertility preservation prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Methods: To report a successful case of gonadotropin stimulation and embryo cryopreservation using the [...] Read more.
Purpose: To describe a patient with sickle cell disease, a prothrombotic disorder, who underwent successful embryo cryopreservation for the purposes of fertility preservation prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Methods: To report a successful case of gonadotropin stimulation and embryo cryopreservation using the aromatase inhibitor letrozole to maintain low serum estradiol to minimize thrombotic risk in a patient with sickle cell disease (SCD) and history of retinal artery thrombosis planning hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The patient was given letrozole (5 mg daily) as well as prophylactic enoxaparin while undergoing gonadotropin stimulation with an antagonist protocol to preserve fertility prior to HSCT. After the oocyte retrieval, letrozole was continued for one additional week. Results: The patient’s peak serum estradiol concentration was 172 pg/mL during gonadotropin stimulation. Ten mature oocytes were retrieved and a total of 10 blastocysts were cryopreserved. The patient required pain medication and intravenous fluids after oocyte retrieval due to pain but had significant improvement at the scheduled post-operative day one follow-up. No embolic events occurred during stimulation or 6 months thereafter. Conclusion: The utilization of definitive treatment for SCD with stem cell transplant is increasing. We successfully used letrozole to maintain low serum estradiol during gonadotropin stimulation along with prophylactic enoxaparin in a patient with SCD to minimize her risk of thrombosis. This approach will allow patients planning definitive treatment with stem cell transplant the opportunity to preserve their fertility safely. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 9234 KB  
Article
An Update on Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation (POC) in Italy: Medical, Epidemiological and Legal Consideration
by Jessica Cremonese, Marianna Marcon, Laura Oppi, Giulia Paletti, Vincenzo Romolo, Pamela Tozzo and Luciana Caenazzo
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(4), 2371; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042371 - 18 Feb 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5007
Abstract
Starting with a brief socioeconomic analysis of the phenomenon of female fertility, this narrative review aims to provide an analysis of the use and possibilities of medically assisted reproductive technology in combating fertility issues, adopting socioeconomic, legal and medical perspectives in Italy. The [...] Read more.
Starting with a brief socioeconomic analysis of the phenomenon of female fertility, this narrative review aims to provide an analysis of the use and possibilities of medically assisted reproductive technology in combating fertility issues, adopting socioeconomic, legal and medical perspectives in Italy. The authors mainly employ data from the annual reports of the National Registry of Medically Assisted Reproduction (PMA Registry) and the Italian Statistical Institute (ISTAT) to understand the evolution of oocyte use in medically assisted reproductive technology in Italy from 2015 to 2018 and in particular to dissect the possibilities of oocyte cryopreservation as a measure to counteract age-related infertility, specifically through Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation (POC), also known as “social freezing”. It seems that the best course of action in the context of medically assisted reproduction would be the use of young and healthy cryopreserved oocytes (autologous or donated), preferably before the age of 40, while encouraging donation of oocytes whenever possible. Italy’s dependence on foreign biobanks for donated oocytes calls for the institution of a national biobank and further specific regulation of gamete donation. For this reason, it would be useful to encourage the acceptance of Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation to allow greater availability of healthy, younger oocytes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Women Health and Gynecology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 337 KB  
Review
How to Protect Ovarian Function before and during Chemotherapy?
by Luca Arecco, Tommaso Ruelle, Valentino Martelli, Andrea Boutros, Maria Maddalena Latocca, Stefano Spinaci, Camilla Marrocco, Claudia Massarotti and Matteo Lambertini
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4192; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184192 - 16 Sep 2021
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 7722
Abstract
A significant number of women receive a cancer diagnosis before their age of natural menopause. Among these patients, the most frequent neoplasms are breast cancer, gynecological, and hematological malignancies. Premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility are among the most feared short- to long-term consequences [...] Read more.
A significant number of women receive a cancer diagnosis before their age of natural menopause. Among these patients, the most frequent neoplasms are breast cancer, gynecological, and hematological malignancies. Premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility are among the most feared short- to long-term consequences of anticancer treatments in premenopausal patients. Both patient- and treatment-related characteristics are key factors in influencing the risk of gonadotoxicity with the use of chemotherapy. The cryopreservation of oocytes/embryos is a standard strategy for fertility preservations offered to young women interested in future family planning, but it does not allow gonadal function protection during chemotherapy. Ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy is now recommended as an option to reduce the risk of gonadotoxicity in order to avoid the negative consequences of premature ovarian insufficiency in premenopausal women receiving cytotoxic therapy, including those not interested in fertility preservation. This review summarizes the risk of treatment-induced gonadotoxicity in premenopausal patients and the evidence available on the protective role of administering GnRHa during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function. Full article
17 pages, 2238 KB  
Review
Social Freezing: Pressing Pause on Fertility
by Valentin Nicolae Varlas, Roxana Georgiana Bors, Dragos Albu, Ovidiu Nicolae Penes, Bogdana Adriana Nasui, Claudia Mehedintu and Anca Lucia Pop
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(15), 8088; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158088 - 30 Jul 2021
Cited by 56 | Viewed by 12609
Abstract
Increasing numbers of women are undergoing oocyte or tissue cryopreservation for medical or social reasons to increase their chances of having genetic children. Social egg freezing (SEF) allows women to preserve their fertility in anticipation of age-related fertility decline and ineffective fertility treatments [...] Read more.
Increasing numbers of women are undergoing oocyte or tissue cryopreservation for medical or social reasons to increase their chances of having genetic children. Social egg freezing (SEF) allows women to preserve their fertility in anticipation of age-related fertility decline and ineffective fertility treatments at older ages. The purpose of this study was to summarize recent findings focusing on the challenges of elective egg freezing. We performed a systematic literature review on social egg freezing published during the last ten years. From the systematically screened literature, we identified and analyzed five main topics of interest during the last decade: (a) different fertility preservation techniques, (b) safety of freezing, (c) usage rate of frozen oocytes, (d) ethical considerations, and (e) cost-effectiveness of SEF. Fertility can be preserved for non-medical reasons through oocyte, embryos, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, with oocyte vitrification being a new and optimal approach. Elective oocyte cryopreservation is better accepted, supports social gender equality, and enhances women’s reproductive autonomy. Despite controversies, planned oocyte cryopreservation appears as a chosen strategy against age-related infertility and may allow women to feel that they are more socially, psychologically, and financially stable before motherhood. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Women's Reproductive and Maternal Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop