Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (384)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
27 pages, 5667 KiB  
Article
Pre-Vaccination Immune Profiles and Responsiveness to Innate Stimuli Predict Reactogenicity and Antibody Magnitude Following mRNA Vaccination
by Amanda E. Zelkoski, Emilie Goguet, Emily Samuels Darcey, Mohamad-Gabriel Alameh, Hooda Said, Simon Pollett, John H. Powers, Eric D. Laing, Cara Olsen, Edward Mitre and Allison M. W. Malloy
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 718; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070718 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 680
Abstract
Background: While mRNA vaccines effectively limit hospitalization and severe COVID-19 disease, the precise early innate immune mechanisms associated with their efficacy and reactogenicity remain underexplored. The identification of innate immune correlates prior to vaccination could provide mechanistic insights and potentially predict responses. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: While mRNA vaccines effectively limit hospitalization and severe COVID-19 disease, the precise early innate immune mechanisms associated with their efficacy and reactogenicity remain underexplored. The identification of innate immune correlates prior to vaccination could provide mechanistic insights and potentially predict responses. Methods: We developed an in vitro model to study the innate immune activation of pre-vaccination peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collected from participants enrolled in a well-characterized COVID-19 BioNTech/Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine (BNT162b2 vaccine) cohort. Pre-vaccination PBMCs were stimulated with empty lipid nanoparticle (LNP), mRNA-LNP, or Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists. Using multiparameter spectral flow cytometry, we analyzed the baseline immune state, innate responsiveness to stimuli, and cytokine profiles of study participants. These pre-vaccination in vitro results were analyzed for correlations with post-vaccination symptoms and spike-specific IgG responses. Results: Baseline dendritic cell (DC) states inversely correlated with the magnitude of symptoms following BNT162b2 vaccination. Heightened conventional (cDC) and weaker plasmacytoid DC (pDC) responses to RNA stimuli correlated with the magnitude of an acute IgG response. IgG durability modestly correlated with a lower pDC state but higher cDC2 and monocyte baseline states and inversely correlated with TLR3 agonist responsiveness. Conclusions: The pre-vaccination assessment of innate immune function and resting states can be used to fit models potentially predictive of immunogenicity and reactogenicity to BNT162b2 vaccination. Pre-vaccination DC states may influence reactogenicity, while the response to RNA may impact antibody responses. Our data suggest that pre-vaccination assessment offers insights into the innate mechanisms driving mRNA vaccine responses and has predictive potential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nucleic Acid (DNA and mRNA) Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1908 KiB  
Article
SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) Protein–Protein Conjugate Induces Similar or Better Antibody Responses as Spike mRNA in Rhesus Macaques
by Puthupparampil V. Scaria, Christopher G. Rowe, Ivan Kosik, Zhe Hu, Jonathan P. Renn, Nada Alani, Pinar Kemanli, Sachy Orr-Gonzalez, Lynn E. Lambert, Kayode Adeyemi, Justin Y. A. Doritchamou, Emma K. Barnafo, Kelly M. Rausch, Liya Muslinkina, Robert D. Morrison, John-Paul Todd, Dominic Esposito, Andrew Lees, Jonathan Yewdell and Patrick E. Duffy
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 648; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060648 - 17 Jun 2025
Viewed by 885
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Rapid development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 was pivotal to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergency also provided a rare opportunity to test novel vaccine platforms such as mRNA in large clinical trials. Most of the early vaccines used SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Rapid development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 was pivotal to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergency also provided a rare opportunity to test novel vaccine platforms such as mRNA in large clinical trials. Most of the early vaccines used SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as the target antigen. Nevertheless, subsequent studies have shown that Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of Spike also can yield efficacious vaccines, and we previously demonstrated that chemical conjugation of RBD to a carrier protein, EcoCRM®, enhanced antibody responses and induced strong virus neutralization activity in mice. Methods: Here, we compared the immunogenicity of this conjugate to that of an approved mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech in rhesus macaques over a period of nine months. Results: AS01-adjuvanted RBD conjugate induced a similar or better antibody response, receptor binding inhibition, and virus neutralization activity against different variants of SARS-CoV-2, compared to mRNA. IgG subclass profiles induced by conjugate and mRNA vaccines were initially dominated by IgG1 and IgG3 then switched to IgG2 and IgG4 dominant profiles during the subsequent six-month period. Polyclonal immune sera from the conjugate and mRNA had similar antibody avidity at multiple time points. Conclusions: In summary, antibody responses in rhesus macaques induced by the RBD-EcoCRM conjugate and the Spike mRNA vaccine are very similar. These results demonstrate the potential for the RBD-EcoCRM conjugate as a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Receptor-Binding Domain-Based Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 568 KiB  
Article
Symptom Profile and Breakthrough Infections in Healthcare Workers Post Comirnaty Vaccine in a Tertiary General Hospital in Greece: A Narrative Review
by Helen Giamarellou, Theodoros Karavasilis, Vissaria Sakka, Evmorfia Pechlivanidou, Vasiliki Syriopoulou, Fragiskos Dasyras, Athanasios Michos, Nikolaos Spanakis, Ilias Karaiskos, Lambrini Galani and Eleni Papadogeorgaki
COVID 2025, 5(5), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/covid5050063 - 25 Apr 2025
Viewed by 409
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated urgent measures to curb its spread, with vaccination emerging as a pivotal strategy. This prospective observational study evaluated breakthrough COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers (HCWs) vaccinated with Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) at a tertiary care hospital in Greece. Over an [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated urgent measures to curb its spread, with vaccination emerging as a pivotal strategy. This prospective observational study evaluated breakthrough COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers (HCWs) vaccinated with Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) at a tertiary care hospital in Greece. Over an 8-month period, from February to September 2021, 1958 fully vaccinated HCWs were monitored. Rapid antigen tests and RT-PCR tests were conducted weekly for asymptomatic HCWs. Contact tracing and whole-genome sequencing were performed. Results showed that 2.75% (54 cases) of HCWs experienced breakthrough infections. Among these, 25 (45%) were asymptomatic, mild symptoms occurred in 21 (37%), while 7 (13%) had a fever (≥38 °C) alone and 3 (5%) developed high fever (≥39 °C) with respiratory symptoms. Physicians and nursing staff were the most affected groups. Dominant SARS-CoV-2 variants detected included Delta, British, and Wild type variants. Comparison with existing literature underscored the effectiveness of Comirnaty in reducing breakthrough infections. The findings emphasize the importance of continued booster vaccinations and ongoing surveillance to mitigate breakthrough infections among HCWs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID Clinical Manifestations and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

50 pages, 3587 KiB  
Review
Beyond the Pandemic Era: Recent Advances and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Against Emerging Variants of Concern
by Ankita Saha, Sounak Ghosh Roy, Richa Dwivedi, Prajna Tripathi, Kamal Kumar, Shashank Manohar Nambiar and Rajiv Pathak
Vaccines 2025, 13(4), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13040424 - 17 Apr 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2668
Abstract
Vaccination has been instrumental in curbing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and mitigating the severity of clinical manifestations associated with COVID-19. Numerous COVID-19 vaccines have been developed to this effect, including BioNTech-Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines, as well as adenovirus vector-based vaccines such as [...] Read more.
Vaccination has been instrumental in curbing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and mitigating the severity of clinical manifestations associated with COVID-19. Numerous COVID-19 vaccines have been developed to this effect, including BioNTech-Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA vaccines, as well as adenovirus vector-based vaccines such as Oxford–AstraZeneca. However, the emergence of new variants and subvariants of SARS-CoV-2, characterized by enhanced transmissibility and immune evasion, poses significant challenges to the efficacy of current vaccination strategies. In this review, we aim to comprehensively outline the landscape of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) and sub-lineages that have recently surfaced in the post-pandemic years. We assess the effectiveness of existing vaccines, including their booster doses, against these emerging variants and subvariants, such as BA.2-derived sub-lineages, XBB sub-lineages, and BA.2.86 (Pirola). Furthermore, we discuss the latest advancements in vaccine technology, including multivalent and pan-coronavirus approaches, along with the development of several next-generation coronavirus vaccines, such as exosome-based, virus-like particle (VLP), mucosal, and nanomaterial-based vaccines. Finally, we highlight the key challenges and critical areas for future research to address the evolving threat of SARS-CoV-2 subvariants and to develop strategies for combating the emergence of new viral threats, thereby improving preparedness for future pandemics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SARS-CoV-2 Variants, Vaccines, and Immune Responses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1095 KiB  
Case Report
A Rare Case of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Following the Second Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine—Just a Coincidence? A Case Report
by David Matyáš, Roman Herzig, Libor Šimůnek and Mohamed Abuhajar
Reports 2025, 8(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/reports8020050 - 16 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1076
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: The occurrence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), both with or without thrombocytopenia, following COVID-19 vaccination, is well documented and more common in recipients of vector vaccines. Cases of CVST following immunization with the COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: The occurrence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), both with or without thrombocytopenia, following COVID-19 vaccination, is well documented and more common in recipients of vector vaccines. Cases of CVST following immunization with the COVID-19 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine are rare; most of these cases occur within 28 days of the first dose of the vaccine. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 38-year-old male with a history of two episodes of deep vein thrombosis in the lower limbs, but without a specific thrombophilic condition, who developed CVST 13 days after the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine. He suffered from diffuse tension-type headache of progressively increasing intensity, and his objective neurological findings were normal. Magnetic resonance venography showed thrombosis of the transverse and right sigmoid sinuses, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed no cerebral infarction. Two months later, a follow-up MR venography showed partial recanalization of the affected sinuses, and a brain MRI showed no infarction. Conclusions: Given the temporal sequence and the absence of other possible causes, we speculate that the second dose of the COVID-19 BNT162b2 vaccine may have triggered the development of CVST. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 654 KiB  
Communication
Immune Response Against Recent Omicron Sub-Lineages in Persons with HIV Receiving a Protein-Based or mRNA XBB.1.5 SARS-CoV-2 Booster Vaccine
by Alessandra Vergori, Giulia Matusali, Eleonora Cimini, Alessandro Cozzi Lepri, Valentina Mazzotta, Davide Mariotti, Francesca Colavita, Simona Gili, Flavia Cristofanelli, Marisa Fusto, Roberta Gagliardini, Jessica Paulicelli, Federico Cecilia, Enrico Girardi, Fabrizio Maggi and Andrea Antinori
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(8), 3521; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26083521 - 9 Apr 2025
Viewed by 651
Abstract
The new Nuvaxovid protein-based and Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based vaccines targeting Omicron XBB.1.5 were available during the 2023–2024 autumn/winter vaccination campaign for frail individuals, including people with HIV (PWH). We assessed the immune response in 51 PWH on stable ART who received a booster with [...] Read more.
The new Nuvaxovid protein-based and Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based vaccines targeting Omicron XBB.1.5 were available during the 2023–2024 autumn/winter vaccination campaign for frail individuals, including people with HIV (PWH). We assessed the immune response in 51 PWH on stable ART who received a booster with either the Nuvaxovid protein-based (n = 25) or Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based XBB.1.5 vaccine (n = 26). The median age was 57 years (IQR 51–65), the median count of CD4 at T0 was 652/mmc (503–935), and CD4 nadir was 226/mmc (95–340). Samples were collected before (T0) and one month after (T1) the booster. We measured neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) titers against D614G, XBB.1.6, and JN.1 variants and T-cell IFN-γ levels produced upon specific stimulation. Regardless of the vaccine used, we observed a marked increase in nAbs titers from T0 to T1 against all the subvariants, but no evidence for a change in IFN-γ release. After controlling for confounders, there was no evidence for a difference in the T0-T1 change in nAbs titers against XBB.1.16 and JN.1 by the type of vaccine, while Nuvaxovid determined a smaller increase in D614G nAbs (p = 0.008). The XBB.1.5 protein-based vaccine’s immunogenicity as a fifth or later booster was comparable to the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine, particularly against recent Omicron variants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 267 KiB  
Review
The Application of mRNA Technology for Vaccine Production—Current State of Knowledge
by Anna Paczkowska, Karolina Hoffmann, Agata Andrzejczak, Weronika Faustyna Pucek, Dorota Kopciuch, Wiesław Bryl, Elżbieta Nowakowska and Krzysztof Kus
Vaccines 2025, 13(4), 389; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13040389 - 4 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1814
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, intensive research has been conducted on the development of therapeutic mRNA, leading to numerous discoveries that have enabled its use in therapy. The main achievements in this field include increasing mRNA stability, reducing its immunogenicity (i.e., its ability [...] Read more.
Over the past 20 years, intensive research has been conducted on the development of therapeutic mRNA, leading to numerous discoveries that have enabled its use in therapy. The main achievements in this field include increasing mRNA stability, reducing its immunogenicity (i.e., its ability to trigger an immune response), and solving the challenge of delivering mRNA into cells—all to achieve a therapeutic effect. The aim of this study was to review the scientific literature on the use of mRNA technology in the production of vaccines. Various methods of applying mRNA technology that could potentially be introduced into clinical practice in the future are described. A detailed analysis was conducted on the approved COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech (New York, NY, USA) and Moderna (Kirkland, QC, Canada), as their introduction marked a groundbreaking moment in the advancement of mRNA technology. This study was based on the latest scientific literature from reputable publishers and medical databases such as PubMed and ClinicalTrials. In conclusion, mRNA technology is currently experiencing rapid development, significantly driven by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The application of this technology holds great potential not only for vaccines against infectious diseases but also for cancer treatment. However, further research is necessary to facilitate its broader clinical implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine Development and Global Health)
22 pages, 1295 KiB  
Article
COVID-19 Vaccination Protects Skeletal Muscle Against Statin-Related Side Effects
by Daria Schetz, Jacek Sein Anand, Karolina Kuźbicka, Marcin Wirtwein and Ivan Kocić
Vaccines 2025, 13(4), 357; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13040357 - 27 Mar 2025
Viewed by 627
Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has disrupted global health systems, with vaccines being essential to mitigating its impact. Statins, widely prescribed for dyslipidemia, are associated with muscle-related side effects, which may worsen during COVID-19. This study explores the association between statin use, [...] Read more.
Introduction: COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has disrupted global health systems, with vaccines being essential to mitigating its impact. Statins, widely prescribed for dyslipidemia, are associated with muscle-related side effects, which may worsen during COVID-19. This study explores the association between statin use, COVID-19 vaccination, and skeletal muscle-related symptoms. Aims: To evaluate the association between statin use and muscle symptoms (pain and creatine kinase (CK) levels) in COVID-19 patients and investigate whether vaccination is associated with changes in these symptoms. Methods: This observational study included 147 symptomatic COVID-19 patients: 74 chronic statin users (SG) and 73 non-users (CG). Vaccination status (unvaccinated, one-dose, or two-dose Pfizer–BioNTech) was recorded. Muscle pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and CK levels were measured. Additional factors, including age, sex, BMI, and smoking status, were analyzed. Statistical tests examined the potential associations between statin use, vaccination, and muscle-related outcomes. Results: Higher CK levels were more frequently reported in SG, with severe rhabdomyolysis occurring slightly more often in the SG (4% vs. 3%). Men had higher CK values, while women appeared to be at greater risk of severe rhabdomyolysis. Older adults (≥65 years) in the SG had significantly higher CK levels. Fully vaccinated individuals had lower CK values and reported less muscle pain, while unvaccinated participants had the highest incidence of CK abnormalities and severe muscle pain. No significant differences in CK levels were observed between SARS-CoV-2 variants. Conclusions: Statin use was associated with elevated CK levels and increased muscle pain severity. Older adults and women appeared more susceptible to severe muscle complications. Full vaccination was linked to lower CK values and reduced muscle symptoms. Further research is needed to confirm these findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1268 KiB  
Systematic Review
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Humoral Immunity in Immunocompetent European Adults: A Systematic Review
by Izabella Bylica, Estera Jachowicz-Matczak, Justyna Brodowicz, Joanna Sułkowska, Monika Bociąga-Jasik, Piotr Heczko, Sebastian Gagatek, Jan Bylica and Jadwiga Wójkowska-Mach
Microorganisms 2025, 13(3), 535; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030535 - 27 Feb 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 669
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, profoundly impacted global health systems and economies. Vaccination and diagnostic advancements were pivotal in managing the pandemic. This systematic review evaluates antibody levels in adults following complete COVID-19 vaccination and examines the prevalence of infections in vaccinated [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, profoundly impacted global health systems and economies. Vaccination and diagnostic advancements were pivotal in managing the pandemic. This systematic review evaluates antibody levels in adults following complete COVID-19 vaccination and examines the prevalence of infections in vaccinated populations. A systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted, focusing on studies analyzing antibody levels at least 14 days after full vaccination with FDA- or EMA-approved vaccines. Five European studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Data were extracted and synthesized from studies involving 6280 participants aged 19 to 105, with an average of 11% having prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Antibody levels were analyzed over time, and the incidence of post-vaccination COVID-19 cases was recorded. The reviewed studies demonstrated that antibody levels peaked shortly after vaccination but gradually declined over time. Individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection exhibited higher antibody titers than those without prior exposure. After the first dose, the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine led to significantly higher antibody levels than the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine, especially in those without prior infection. Across all studies, the incidence of COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals was low (0.1–3.8% for 144–302 days post-vaccination). Vaccination reduced severe outcomes despite decreasing antibody levels. The decline in new COVID-19 cases and related deaths is attributed to widespread vaccination, natural immunity, and virus mutations reducing severity. Further studies are warranted to explore antibody persistence and optimal vaccination strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Challenges in Infectious Diseases Post COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 202 KiB  
Article
COVID-19 Vaccination and Acute Anterior Uveitis—A Case Control Study
by Asaf Shemer, Amit Toledano, Aya Altarescu, Biana Dubinsky-Pertzov, Assaf Rozenberg, Idan Hecht, Adi Einan-Lifshitz and Eran Pras
Vaccines 2025, 13(2), 176; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13020176 - 12 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 845
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech®) coronavirus disease vaccine and new-onset anterior uveitis. Methods: A retrospective case control study of patients admitted and diagnosed with new-onset acute anterior uveitis, and matched controls admitted for other reasons (1:3 ratio), [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the association between the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech®) coronavirus disease vaccine and new-onset anterior uveitis. Methods: A retrospective case control study of patients admitted and diagnosed with new-onset acute anterior uveitis, and matched controls admitted for other reasons (1:3 ratio), was completed. Rates of exposure to the BNT162b2 vaccine were compared between groups, and odds ratios for exposure to the vaccine were calculated. A secondary analysis of the overall number of patients with new-onset anterior uveitis in the six preceding years was conducted. This study was conducted in one academic center in Israel. Results: A total of 16 patients were admitted for acute anterior uveitis during the study period. Of the 16 cases, 11 (69%) received the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine prior to presentation and 8 (50%) also received the second dose. This compares to 39 (81.2%) in the control group. The odds ratio for exposure to the vaccine among cases was 0.508 (95% confidence interval 0.141–1.829, p = 0.300). Compared with preceding years, the rate of cases diagnosed with acute anterior uveitis in 2021 was similar to the six preceding years (mean 11.8 ± 3.4 cases). Conclusions: In this case control study and comparison with preceding years, we found no evidence to suggest an association between vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech®) COVID-19 vaccine and new-onset acute anterior uveitis. Full article
10 pages, 916 KiB  
Case Report
Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Associated with BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Literature Review
by Eleonora Francesca Pattonieri, Marilena Gregorini, Maria Antonietta Grignano, Tefik Islami, Gioacchino D’Ambrosio, Gianluigi Ardissino and Teresa Rampino
Infect. Dis. Rep. 2025, 17(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17010014 - 11 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1197
Abstract
Case Report: We report a case of a 37-year-old female with kidney transplant, who was admitted at our hospital due to worsening renal function, nephrotic proteinuria, and anemia developed 21 days after the second dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Laboratory tests revealed [...] Read more.
Case Report: We report a case of a 37-year-old female with kidney transplant, who was admitted at our hospital due to worsening renal function, nephrotic proteinuria, and anemia developed 21 days after the second dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Laboratory tests revealed hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. Given the clinical picture of Thrombotic Micro-angiopathy (TMA) and severe renal impairment, plasma exchange (PEX) and dialysis were immediately started. Laboratory workup showed low C3 and C4 levels, normal activity of ADAMTS13, and the absence of anti-factor H antibodies. Molecular biology investigations revealed a heterozygous variant in exon 22 (SCR20) of the CFH gene (c.3628C>T; p.Arg1210Cys) described as an atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (aHUS) causative mutation. Our patient completed two sessions of PEX followed by eculizumab treatment with hematological improvement but no recovery of renal function. This is the first reported case of aHUS triggered by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a kidney transplant patient without recovery of renal function. Conclusion: Although rare, clinicians should be aware of possible nephrological complications that may appear after vaccination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology and Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 892 KiB  
Article
Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Schedules Including a Booster Dose in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data from a Prospective Multicenter Study
by Natália Sarzi Sartori, Ketty Lysie Libardi Lira Machado, Samira Tatiyama Miyamoto, Flávia Zon Pretti, Maria da Penha Gomes Gouveia, Yasmin Gurtler Pinheiro de Oliveira, Vanezia Gonçalves da Silva, Filipe Faé, Ana Paula Neves Burian, Karina Rosemarie Lallemand Tapia, Anna Carolina Simões Moulin, Luiza Lorenzoni Grillo, Paula dos Santos Athayde, Helena da Silva Corona, Sabrina de Souza Ramos, Flávia Maria Matos Melo Campos Peixoto, Priscila Dias Cardoso Ribeiro, Vanessa de Oliveira Magalhães, Mariana Freitas de Aguiar, Erika Biegelmeyer, Cristiane Kayser, Alexandre Wagner Silva de Souza, Charlles Heldan de Moura Castro, Juliana Bühring, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Sérgio Henrique Oliveira dos Santos, Clara Pinheiro Martins, Jonathan Willian da Silva Rodrigues, Marcos Mavignier Sousa Dias, Bruna Guimarães Dutra, Camila Maria Paiva França Telles, Samuel Elias Basualto Dias, Rodrigo Poubel Vieira de Rezende, Katia Lino Baptista, Rodrigo Cutrim Gaudio, Ana Karla Guedes de Melo, Valéria Bezerra da Silva, Vitor Alves Cruz, Jozelia Rêgo, Rejane Maria Rodrigues de Abreu Vieira, Adah Sophia Rodrigues Vieira, Adriana Maria Kakehasi, Anna Carolina Faria Moreira Gomes Tavares, Victória Dornelas Paz Carvalho, Renata Henriques de Azevedo, Valderilio Feijó Azevedo, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho, Vanessa Peruhype-Magalhães, Andrese Aline Gasparin, Vanessa Hax, Valéria Valim, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Edgard Torres dos Reis-Neto, Emília Inoue Sato, Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro, Viviane Angelina de Souza, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi and Odirlei André Monticieloadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2025, 13(2), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13020127 - 27 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1353
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the humoral response to and impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a multicenter cohort design. Methods: Data for this analysis were obtained from the Study of Safety, Effectiveness and Duration of Immunity after Vaccination against [...] Read more.
Objective: To evaluate the humoral response to and impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a multicenter cohort design. Methods: Data for this analysis were obtained from the Study of Safety, Effectiveness and Duration of Immunity after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (SAFER), a prospective, multicenter, phase IV, real-world study conducted across different regions of Brazil from June/2021 to March/2024. Patients aged >18 years with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who received any one of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines approved by the Brazilian health regulatory agency (CoronaVac [inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine], ChAdOx-1 [AstraZeneca], or BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech]) were included. Immunogenicity was assessed in pre- and post-vaccination blood samples, and patients were monitored in person and remotely for the occurrence and severity of COVID-19. Results: Two hundred and thirty-five patients with SLE who had completed their vaccination schedules (two doses + booster dose) were included in this study. Most patients were female (89.3%) and had low disease activity or were in remission (72.4%); the majority were also on some form of immunosuppressive therapy (58.1%). One hundred and sixteen patients received two doses of CoronaVac followed by one dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine, eighty-seven received two doses of ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) followed by one dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine, and thirty-two received three doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. Twenty-eight cases of COVID-19, none meeting criteria for severe COVID-19, were recorded in patients with respiratory symptoms after the second dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Regarding immunogenicity, an increase in seroconversion rate was observed following consecutive vaccine doses, with no difference between vaccination schedules, reaching 97.57% seropositivity after a booster dose. The geometric mean IgG titers differed between the different vaccination schedules after the first and the second vaccine dose, being lowest for the CoronaVac-based schedule, but titers were similar after the administration of a booster dose. Conclusion: In patients with SLE, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are immunogenic, inducing a robust humoral response. No severe outcomes associated with death or hospitalization were found in the evaluated patient sample. Complete vaccination schedules including a booster dose induced higher humoral responses than incomplete schedules, especially in patients initially immunized with an inactivated virus vaccine schedule and those with a suboptimal humoral response. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

61 pages, 3993 KiB  
Systematic Review
COVID-19 Vaccines Effectiveness and Safety in Trinidad and Tobago: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Angel Justiz-Vaillant, Kimberly Roopnarine, Shaundell Solomon, Alyssa Phillips, Solange Sandy, Alyssa Subero, Sarah Seepersad, Nicholas Span, Phalmanie Ramnath, Akaasha Ramnarine, Bimala Ramdath, Chelsea Rampaul, Renissa Ramdial, Dana Phagoo, Thalia Ramdhanie, Vinaya Moonilal, Emily-Marie Poliah, Steffan Poonwassie, Karishta Punilal, Sarah Panchoo, Justice Parris, Steven Oudit, Trudy Muir, Johnson Nicholas-Joseph, Bijay Raj Pandit, Sanjeev Pakeerah, Vesham Sookoo, Patrice Richards, Tishia John, Darren Gopaul, Sachin Soodeen, Odette Arozarena-Barbosa, Arlene Williams, Chandrashehkar Unakal, Rodolfo Arozarena Fundora, Reinand Thompson and Patrick Eberechi Akpakaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Microorganisms 2025, 13(1), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13010135 - 10 Jan 2025
Viewed by 2406
Abstract
This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness and side effects of various COVID-19 vaccines, with a focus on Trinidad and Tobago. The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines demonstrated the highest efficacy, particularly against COVID-19 variants, while Janssen and Sinopharm were comparatively less effective. mRNA vaccines, [...] Read more.
This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness and side effects of various COVID-19 vaccines, with a focus on Trinidad and Tobago. The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines demonstrated the highest efficacy, particularly against COVID-19 variants, while Janssen and Sinopharm were comparatively less effective. mRNA vaccines, such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca, were associated with more frequent and severe side effects, including soreness, fever, and cardiovascular issues. The review also identified significant gaps in the current scientific literature regarding COVID-19 vaccination issues in Trinidad and Tobago. These gaps highlight the need for comprehensive research to address vaccination challenges, including public health communication, equitable access, and local perceptions of vaccine safety. This analysis provides a foundation for developing targeted strategies to improve vaccine effectiveness in the region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Editorial Board Members’ Collection Series: SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 441 KiB  
Review
Pemphigus and Bullous Pemphigoid Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review
by Fabrizio Martora, Teresa Battista, Luca Potestio, Maddalena Napolitano, Cataldo Patruno, Matteo Megna and Michela D’Agostino
Viruses 2024, 16(12), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16121896 - 9 Dec 2024
Viewed by 2741
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the rapid development and licensing of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Currently, numerous vaccines are available on a global scale and are based on different mechanisms of action, including mRNA technology, viral vectors, inactive viruses, and subunit particles. Mass vaccination [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the rapid development and licensing of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Currently, numerous vaccines are available on a global scale and are based on different mechanisms of action, including mRNA technology, viral vectors, inactive viruses, and subunit particles. Mass vaccination conducted worldwide has highlighted the potential development of side effects, including ones with skin involvement. This review synthesizes data from 62 manuscripts, reporting a total of 142 cases of autoimmune blistering skin diseases (AIBDs) following COVID-19 vaccination, comprising 59 cases of pemphigus and 83 cases of bullous pemphigoid. Among the 83 bullous pemphigoid cases, 78 were BP, with additional cases including 2 oral mucous membrane pemphigoid, 1 pemphigoid gestationis, 1 anti-p200 BP, and 1 dyshidrosiform BP. The mean age of affected individuals was 72 ± 12.7 years, with an average symptom onset of 11 ± 10.8 days post-vaccination. Notably, 59% of cases followed vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), 51.8% were new diagnoses, and 45.8% occurred after the second dose. The purpose of our review is to analyze the cases of pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid associated with COVID-19 vaccination and to investigate the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the new development or flare-up of these diseases in association with vaccination. Our results show that the association between COVID-19 vaccines and AIBDs is a possible event. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cutaneous Reactions Following Virus Infections and Antiviral Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2094 KiB  
Article
Immunogenicity and Safety According to Immunosuppressive Drugs and Different COVID-19 Vaccine Platforms in Immune-Mediated Disease: Data from SAFER Cohort
by Ketty Lysie Libardi Lira Machado, Ana Paula Neves Burian, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho, José Geraldo Mill, Lunara Baptista Ferreira, Karina Rosemarie Lallemand Tapia, Anna Carolina Simões Moulin, Isac Ribeiro Moulaz, Priscila Dias Cardoso Ribeiro, Vanessa de Oliveira Magalhães, Erika Biegelmeyer, Flávia Maria Matos Melo Campos Peixoto, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Camila Maria Paiva França Telles, Juliana Bühring, Natalia Sarzi Sartorio, Vanessa Hax, Rodrigo Poubel Vieira de Rezende, Katia Lino Baptista, Ana Karla Guedes de Melo, Vitor Alves Cruz, Rejane Maria Rodrigues de Abreu Vieira, Renata Henriques de Azevedo, Valderilio Feijó Azevedo, Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro, Odirlei André Monticielo, Edgard Torres Dos Reis Neto, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Emilia Inoue Sato, Viviane Angelina de Souza, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi and Valeria Valimadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2024, 12(12), 1367; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12121367 - 3 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1487
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) depends on the underlying disease, immunosuppression degree and the vaccine regimens. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccine schedules. Methods: The SAFER study: “Safety and effectiveness of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) depends on the underlying disease, immunosuppression degree and the vaccine regimens. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccine schedules. Methods: The SAFER study: “Safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease”, is a Brazilian multicentric prospective observational phase IV study in the real-life. Data were analyzed after 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines: adenoviral vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Astrazeneca), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer–BioNTech) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac Biotech). IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike (IgG-S) receptor-binding domain level were quantified at baseline (T1) and 28 days after the first (T2), 2nd (T3) and 3rd (T4) doses by chemiluminescence (SARS-CoV-2-IgG-II Quant-assay, Abbott-Laboratories). Results: 721 patients with IMID were included in the analysis. The median titers of IgG-S (BAU/mL) increased progressively over the times: at baseline was 6.26 (5.41–7.24), T2: 73.01 (61.53–86.62), T3: 200.0 (174.36–229.41) and T4: 904.92 (800.49–1022.97). The multivariate linear regression showed that greater IgG-S titers were associated with pre-exposure to COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and BNT162b2 booster vaccine (p < 0.001). Rituximab and immunosuppressant drugs were independent factors for low titers (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: All platforms were safe and induced an increase in IgG-S antibodies. COVID-19 pre-exposure and BNT162b2 booster regimens were predictors of higher humoral immune responses, which is relevant in immunosuppressed populations. Immunosuppressants (mainly rituximab) predicted the lowest antibodies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Autoimmune Diseases and Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop