Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (53)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = MR-linac

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 1326 KB  
Review
MR-Guided Radiotherapy in Oesophageal Cancer: From Principles to Practice—A Narrative Review
by Su Chen Fong, Eddie Lau, David S. Liu, Niall C. Tebbutt, Richard Khor, Trevor Leong, David Williams, Sergio Uribe and Sweet Ping Ng
Curr. Oncol. 2026, 33(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol33010034 - 8 Jan 2026
Viewed by 308
Abstract
Oesophageal cancer remains a significant global health burden with poor survival outcomes despite multimodal treatment. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have opened opportunities to improve radiotherapy delivery. This review examines the role of MRI and MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) in oesophageal cancer, [...] Read more.
Oesophageal cancer remains a significant global health burden with poor survival outcomes despite multimodal treatment. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have opened opportunities to improve radiotherapy delivery. This review examines the role of MRI and MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) in oesophageal cancer, focusing on applications in staging, treatment planning, and response assessment, with particular emphasis on magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac)-based delivery. Compared to computed tomography (CT), MRI offers superior soft-tissue contrast, enabling more accurate tumour delineation and the potential for reduced treatment margins. Real-time MR imaging during treatment can facilitate motion management, while daily adaptive planning can accommodate anatomical changes throughout the treatment course. Functional MRI sequences, including diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, offer quantitative data for treatment response monitoring. Early clinical and dosimetric studies demonstrate that MRgRT can significantly reduce radiation dose to critical organs while maintaining target coverage. However, clinical evidence for MRgRT in oesophageal cancer is limited to small early-phase studies, with no phase II/III trials demonstrating improvements in survival, toxicity, or patient-reported outcomes. Long-term clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness remain unproven, highlighting the need for prospective outcome-focused studies to define the role for MRgRT within multimodality treatment pathways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adaptive Radiotherapy: Advanced Imaging for Personalised Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1709 KB  
Article
Clinical Implementation of PSMA-PET Guided Tumor Response-Based Boost Adaptation in Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer
by Ruiqi Li, Mu-Han Lin, Nghi C. Nguyen, Fan-Chi Su, David Parsons, Erica Salcedo, Elizeva Phillips, Sean Domal, Aurelie Garant, Raquibul Hannan, Daniel Yang, Asim Afaq, MinJae Lee, Orhan K. Oz and Neil Desai
Cancers 2025, 17(17), 2893; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17172893 - 3 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1982
Abstract
Purpose or Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of integrating sequential PSMA-PET imaging into an offline–online adaptive workflow for response-based dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL)-boosting high-risk prostate cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Materials and Methods: As part of a prospective [...] Read more.
Purpose or Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of integrating sequential PSMA-PET imaging into an offline–online adaptive workflow for response-based dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL)-boosting high-risk prostate cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Materials and Methods: As part of a prospective trial, patients were treated on MR- or CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy (ART) systems with prostate/pelvic node 5-fraction SABR (36.25 Gy/25 Gy) with DIL boost (50 Gy). Whereas traditional DIL boost volumes delineate full pre-therapy imaging-defined disease (GTVinitial), this study serially refined DIL boost volumes based on treatment response defined by PSMA-PET scans after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (nADT, GTVmb1) and fraction 3 SABR (GTVmb2). DIL delineation employed PET-PSMA fusion to CT/MR simulation and was guided by a rule-based %SUVmax threshold approach. Comparisons of GTV volumes and OAR dosimetry were performed between plans using GTVinitial versus GTVmb1/GTVmb2 for DIL boost, for each of the initial cohorts of five patients from the initially treated cohorts. Results: Five patients treated on MR-Linac (n = 3) or CBCT-based ART (n = 2) were analyzed. Three patients exhibited complete imaging response after nADT, omitting GTVmb boosts. Offline GTVmb refinements based on PSMA-PET were seamlessly integrated into ART workflows without introducing additional treatment time. DIL GTV volumes significantly decreased (p = 0.03) from an initial mean of 11.4 cc (GTVinitial) to 4.1 cc (GTVmb1) and 3.0 cc (GTVmb2). Dosimetric analysis showed meaningful reductions in OAR doses: rectal wall D0.035 cc decreased by up to 12 Gy, while bladder wall D0.035 cc and V18.3 Gy reduced from 52.3 Gy and 52.3 cc (Plan_initial) to 42.9 Gy and 24.9 cc (Plan_mb2), respectively. Urethra doses remained stable, with minor reductions. Sigmoid and femoral head doses remained within acceptable limits. Online adaptation efficiently addressed daily anatomical variations, enabling simulation-free plan re-optimization. Conclusion: PSMA-PET-guided adaptive microboosting for HRPCa SABR is feasible and effective. Standard MR-Linac and CBCT systems offer practical alternatives to BgRT platforms, enabling biology-driven dose personalization and potentially reducing toxicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Approaches in Radiotherapy for Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2586 KB  
Article
MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate and Pancreas Cancer Treatment: A Dosimetric Study Across Two Major MR-Linac Platforms
by Huiming Dong, Jonathan Pham, Michael V. Lauria, Caiden Atienza, Brett Sloman, Paul Barry, Jennifer Davis, Michael Saracen, Amar Kishan, Ann Raldow, X. Sharon Qi, Daniel Hyer and James Lamb
Cancers 2025, 17(16), 2708; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162708 - 20 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2604
Abstract
Background/Objectives: MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) has rapidly evolved into an important treatment modality, with the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian systems being two major MR-linac platforms. Despite the shared concept of MRgRT, the two platforms elected different system designs that could potentially impact [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) has rapidly evolved into an important treatment modality, with the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian systems being two major MR-linac platforms. Despite the shared concept of MRgRT, the two platforms elected different system designs that could potentially impact the dosimetric characteristics and quality of a treatment. In this study, we aim to perform a comparative dosimetric investigation between these two MR-linac systems in prostate and pancreas cancers. Methods: Dosimetric characteristics were evaluated by retrospectively re-creating 20 clinical prostate and pancreas cases originally treated on MRIdian using the Unity system, adhering to MIRAGE and SMART clinical trial constraints. Treatment plans were re-created with matching planning images, structures, beam geometry, and dose parameters. To ensure comparison consistency, all Unity treatment plans were normalized to match the target coverage of the MRIdian counterparts, and the organ-at-risk (OAR) dose was investigated. Results: Most OARs’ dose-volume metrics showed no statistically significant differences. For prostate patients, Unity demonstrated lower rectum V36Gy (p = 0.0095), V38Gy (p = 0.0043), V40Gy (p = 0.0469), and lower left (p = 0.0137) and right femur V20Gy (p = 0.0020). For pancreas patients, Unity plans had a lower mean liver dose (p = 0.0371). All Unity plans had a Gamma passing rate > 90%, confirming the clinical deliverability. Mean delivery times were 12.78 ± 1.68 and 13.53 ± 1.88 min for MRIdian and Unity prostate plans, respectively, and 14.58 ± 2.78 and 17.40 ± 3.77 min for MRIdian and Unity pancreas plans, respectively. Conclusions: Overall, comparable treatment quality and delivery times were observed between the two platforms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Methods and Technologies Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1300 KB  
Article
Optimizing Motion Management and Baseline Shifts in Magnetic Resonance-Guided Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
by Yao Ding, Travis C. Salzillo, Debra N. Yeboa, Martin C. Tom, Zhiheng Wang, Parmeswaran Diagaradjane, Ergys Subashi, Jinzhong Yang, Todd Swanson, Thomas Beckham, Chenyang Wang, Amol J. Ghia, Tina Briere, Jihong Wang, Fabienne Lathuilière, Sneha Cloake and Eun Young Han
Cancers 2025, 17(16), 2697; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17162697 - 19 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1192
Abstract
Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has proven effective in controlling spinal lesions with minimal toxicity, primarily due to its ability to limit spinal cord dose. Recent advances in MR-linac (MRL) technology offer superior spinal cord visualization and real-time gating, which can facilitate [...] Read more.
Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has proven effective in controlling spinal lesions with minimal toxicity, primarily due to its ability to limit spinal cord dose. Recent advances in MR-linac (MRL) technology offer superior spinal cord visualization and real-time gating, which can facilitate dose escalation in spinal tumor treatment while maintaining safety. Purpose: This study aimed to optimize motion management for spine SBRT on an MRL by analyzing patient-specific motion dynamics and evaluating the most effective registration structures. We hypothesized that baseline shifts (BLS) would improve delivery efficiency while maintaining spinal cord dose constraints. The goal was to establish displacement thresholds and assess the role of baseline shift correction adaptative planning in improving treatment delivery efficiency. Methods: Twelve patients underwent two MRI sessions on the MRL. The optimal registration structure was identified, and intrafraction motion was assessed to calculate delivery efficiency. Baseline shift (BLS) simulations were applied for five cases that showed significant motion and suboptimal delivery efficiency, and the dosimetric impact of the BLS was evaluated. The simulated BLS-based plan adaptation was implemented via a segment aperture morphing adapt-to-position workflow. Results: The most stable registration structure was the spinal canal plus three adjacent vertebrae. Cine imaging revealed average intrafraction motion (95th to 5th percentiles) of 0.8 ± 0.5 mm in the right-left (RL) direction, 0.9 ± 0.6 mm in the anterior–posterior (AP) direction, and 0.7 ± 0.5 mm in the SI direction. Simulated BLS improved delivery efficiency to >80% in all but one case, with a ±1 mm displacement threshold tolerance. While target coverage remained consistent after BLS simulation, the spinal cord dose increased by 7–60%, exceeding the 14 Gy constraint in three of the five simulated cases. Conclusions: Cine imaging and BLS can enhance delivery efficiency in spine SBRT but may increase spinal cord dose. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection, advanced motion management, and patient-specific BLS protocols. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 713 KB  
Article
Ablative Five-Fraction CT Versus MR-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: In Silico Evaluation of Interfraction Anatomic Changes as a Rationale for Online Adaptive Replanning
by Adeel Kaiser, Nicole Luther, Kathryn E. Mittauer, Amna Gul, Robert A. Herrera, Mukesh K. Roy, Ashley Fellows, Amy Rzepczynski, Will Deere, Matthew D. Hall, Rupesh Kotecha, Nema Bassiri-Gharb, Alonso N. Gutierrez and Michael D. Chuong
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2061; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132061 - 20 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1743
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly employed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using computed tomography-guided radiotherapy (CTgRT) without online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). The safe delivery of ablative SBRT has been demonstrated using stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Non-ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly employed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using computed tomography-guided radiotherapy (CTgRT) without online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). The safe delivery of ablative SBRT has been demonstrated using stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART). We performed an in silico comparison of non-adapted CTgRT versus SMART to better understand the potential benefit of oART for ablative pancreatic SBRT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated original and daily adapted SMART plans that were previously delivered for 20 consecutive LAPC cases (120 total plans across all patients) treated on a 0.35 T MR-linac prescribed to 50 Gy (gross disease) and 33 Gy (elective sites) simultaneously in five fractions. Six comparative CTgRT plans for each patient (one original, five daily treatment) were retrospectively generated with the same prescribed dose and planning parameters as the SMART plans assuming no oART availability. The impact of daily anatomic changes on CTgRT and SMART plans without oART was evaluated across each treatment day MRI scan acquired for SMART. Results: Ninety percent of cases involved the pancreatic head. No statistically significant differences were seen between CTgRT and SMART with respect to target coverage. Nearly all (96%) fractions planned on either CT or MRI platforms exceeded at least one GI organ at risk (OAR) constraint without oART. Significant differences favoring SMART over non-adaptive CTgRT were observed for the duodenum V35 Gy ≤ 0.5 cc (34.2 vs. 41.9 Gy, p = 0.0035) and duodenum V40 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (37 vs. 52.5 Gy, p = 0.0006) constraints. Stomach V40 Gy trended towards significance favoring SMART (37 vs. 40.3 Gy, p = 0.057) while no significant differences were seen. Conclusions: This is the first study that quantifies the frequency and extent of GI OAR constraint violations that would occur during ablative five-fraction SBRT using SMART vs. CTgRT. GI OAR constraint violations are expected for most fractions without oART whereas all constraints can be achieved with oART. As such, these data suggest that oART should be required for ablative five-fraction pancreatic SBRT. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 491 KB  
Article
The Clinical Feasibility and Safety of 1.5 T MR-Guided Daily Adapted Radiotherapy in 1000 Patients: A Real-World Large Experience of an Early-Adopter Center
by Chiara De-Colle, Michele Rigo, Andrea Gaetano Allegra, Luca Nicosia, Niccolò Giaj-Levra, Edoardo Pastorello, Francesco Ricchetti, Carolina Orsatti, Andrea Romei, Nicola Bianchi, Riccardo Filippo Borgese, Antonio De Simone, Davide Gurrera, Stefania Naccarato, Gianluisa Sicignano, Ruggero Ruggieri and Filippo Alongi
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 2012; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122012 - 17 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1126
Abstract
Purpose/Objective: The clinical implementation of MR-guided radiotherapy on MR-linacs (MRL) hasrapidly increased in recent years. The advantages represented by the MR-based daily online plan adaptation and real-time monitoring have been exploited for different tumor sites. Nevertheless, some concerns remain, mainly related to the [...] Read more.
Purpose/Objective: The clinical implementation of MR-guided radiotherapy on MR-linacs (MRL) hasrapidly increased in recent years. The advantages represented by the MR-based daily online plan adaptation and real-time monitoring have been exploited for different tumor sites. Nevertheless, some concerns remain, mainly related to the longer treatment time and limited patient eligibility. We report here the experience of our center, where a 1.5T MRL was clinically implemented in 2019 and, since then, more than 1200 patients have been treated. Material and Methods: The first 1000 patients treated at the MRL in our department were selected. Technical information such as treatment time and adaptive technic have been prospectively recorded, while toxicity data were retrospectively collected. Results: Between October 2019 and June 2024, 1000 patients for a total of 1061 treatment courses were included. Prostate and prostate bed were irradiated in 57.1% and 10.2% of the cases, respectively, including regional pelvic lymphnodes in 4.7%. Other frequent treated sites were lymph node metastases, pancreas and liver. The most frequent prescribed doses were 36.25 Gy (31%), 35 Gy (28.3%) and 30 Gy (9.4%) in five fractions. On a total of 9076 administered fractions, 80.8% were performed with adapt-to-shape and 19.2% with adapt-to-position method. The mean in-room time was 38 min (range, 18–103), with 74.4% of patients completing the session within 40 min. Acute grade (G) 3 toxicity was recorded in 1.6% of the cases, while, on a total of 858 patients available for late toxicity, G3 was recorded in 0.3% of the cases, with no >G3. Conclusions: Our real-world experience of an early-adopter center confirms that MRL treatments are feasible for different tumor entities in several anatomical sites. We showed that most of the patients could be treated within 40 min and showed low toxicity rates. Protocols for dose escalation and margin reduction, by adopting new comprehensive motion monitoring strategies, are under development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Research of Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

52 pages, 2212 KB  
Review
New Approaches in Radiotherapy
by Matthew Webster, Alexander Podgorsak, Fiona Li, Yuwei Zhou, Hyunuk Jung, Jihyung Yoon, Olga Dona Lemus and Dandan Zheng
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 1980; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17121980 - 13 Jun 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 13824
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) has undergone transformative advancements since its inception over a century ago. This review highlights the most promising and impactful innovations shaping the current and future landscape of RT. Key technological advances include adaptive radiotherapy (ART), which tailors treatment to daily anatomical [...] Read more.
Radiotherapy (RT) has undergone transformative advancements since its inception over a century ago. This review highlights the most promising and impactful innovations shaping the current and future landscape of RT. Key technological advances include adaptive radiotherapy (ART), which tailors treatment to daily anatomical changes using integrated imaging and artificial intelligence (AI), and advanced image guidance systems, such as MR-LINACs, PET-LINACs, and surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT), which enhance targeting precision and minimize collateral damage. AI and data science further support RT through automation, improved segmentation, dose prediction, and treatment planning. Emerging biological and targeted therapies, including boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), radioimmunotherapy, and theranostics, represent the convergence of molecular targeting and radiotherapy, offering personalized treatment strategies. Particle therapies, notably proton and heavy ion RT, exploit the Bragg peak for precise tumor targeting while reducing normal tissue exposure. FLASH RT, delivering ultra-high dose rates, demonstrates promise in sparing normal tissue while maintaining tumor control, though clinical validation is ongoing. Spatially fractionated RT (SFRT), stereotactic techniques and brachytherapy are evolving to treat challenging tumor types with enhanced conformality and efficacy. Innovations such as 3D printing, Auger therapy, and hyperthermia are also contributing to individualized and site-specific solutions. Across these modalities, the integration of imaging, AI, and novel physics and biology-driven approaches is redefining the possibilities of cancer treatment. This review underscores the multidisciplinary and translational nature of modern RT, where physics, engineering, biology, and informatics intersect to improve patient outcomes. While many approaches are in various stages of clinical adoption and investigation, their collective impact promises to redefine the therapeutic boundaries of radiation oncology in the coming decade. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Approaches in Radiotherapy for Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 4766 KB  
Review
Applications of Advanced Imaging for Radiotherapy Planning and Response Assessment in the Central Nervous System
by Liam S. P. Lawrence, Rachel W. Chan, Amit Singnurkar, Jay Detsky, Chris Heyn, Pejman J. Maralani, Hany Soliman, Greg J. Stanisz, Arjun Sahgal and Angus Z. Lau
Tomography 2025, 11(6), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11060068 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 2853
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Radiotherapy for tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) could be improved by incorporating advanced imaging techniques into treatment planning and response assessment. The objective of this narrative review is to highlight the recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Radiotherapy for tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) could be improved by incorporating advanced imaging techniques into treatment planning and response assessment. The objective of this narrative review is to highlight the recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) for applications in CNS radiotherapy. Methods: Recent articles were selected for discussion, covering the following topics: advanced imaging on MRI-linear accelerators for early response assessment in glioma; PET for guiding treatment planning and response assessment in glioma; and contrast-enhanced imaging and metabolic imaging for differentiating tumor progression and radiation necrosis for brain metastasis treatment. Where necessary, searches of scholarly databases (e.g., Google Scholar, PubMed) were used to find papers for each topic. The topics were chosen based on the perception of promise in advancing specific applications of CNS radiotherapy and not covered in detail elsewhere. This review is not intended to be comprehensive. Results: Advanced MRI sequences and PET could have a substantial impact on CNS radiotherapy. For gliomas, the tumor response to therapy could be assessed much earlier than using the conventional technique of measuring changes in tumor size. Using advanced imaging on combined imaging/therapy devices like MR-Linacs would enable response monitoring throughout radiotherapy. For brain metastases, radiation necrosis and tumor progression might be reliably differentiated with imaging techniques sensitive to perfusion or metabolism. However, the lack of level 1 evidence supporting specific uses for each imaging technique is an impediment to widespread use. Conclusions: Advanced MRI and PET have great promise to change the standard of care for CNS radiotherapy, but clinical trials validating specific applications are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in the Use of Advanced Imaging for Radiation Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1582 KB  
Systematic Review
From CBCT to MR-Linac in Image-Guided Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Towards Treatment Personalization
by Florentina Larisa Coc and Loredana G. Marcu
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060291 - 22 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2921
Abstract
Purpose: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has been widely implemented in the treatment of prostate cancer, offering a number of advantages regarding the precision of dose delivery. This study provides an overview of factors, clinical and physical alike, that increase treatment accuracy in prostate [...] Read more.
Purpose: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has been widely implemented in the treatment of prostate cancer, offering a number of advantages regarding the precision of dose delivery. This study provides an overview of factors, clinical and physical alike, that increase treatment accuracy in prostate cancer radiotherapy in the context of IGRT. The following aspects are explored based on recent literature: the radiotherapy technique used in conjunction with IGRT, the type and frequency of IGRT, the impact of radiotherapy technique/IGRT on target dosimetry and organs at risk, the influence of IGRT on planning target volume margins, the impact of treatment time on dosimetric outcome and clinical outcomes using IGRT repositioning or an online adaptive plan. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted within Pubmed/Medline databases to find relevant studies. Of the 152 articles fulfilling the initial search criteria, 79 were selected for final analysis. Results: The frequency of image guidance, the treatment regimen and the radiation technique are important factors that contribute to the optimization and personalization of the treatment plan. The daily anatomy and volume of the bladder and rectum can vary considerably, which can significantly impact the dosimetric effects on these organs. When used in conjunction with volumetric modulated arc therapy, IGRT allows for shaping the dose distribution to avoid nearby critical structures such as the bladder and rectum. Conclusions: Precise tumor targeting via IGRT can result in fewer geometric uncertainties, thereby improving treatment outcome both in terms of superior target coverage and sparing organs at risk. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 4535 KB  
Article
Quantifying Intra- and Inter-Observer Variabilities in Manual Contours for Radiotherapy: Evaluation of an MR Tumor Autocontouring Algorithm for Liver, Prostate, and Lung Cancer Patients
by Gawon Han, Arun Elangovan, Jordan Wong, Asmara Waheed, Keith Wachowicz, Nawaid Usmani, Zsolt Gabos, Jihyun Yun and B. Gino Fallone
Algorithms 2025, 18(5), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/a18050290 - 19 May 2025
Viewed by 1166
Abstract
Real-time tumor-tracked radiotherapy with a linear accelerator-magnetic resonance (linac-MR) hybrid system requires accurate tumor delineation at a fast MR imaging rate. Various autocontouring methods have been previously evaluated against “gold standard” manual contours by experts. However, manually drawn contours have inherent intra- and [...] Read more.
Real-time tumor-tracked radiotherapy with a linear accelerator-magnetic resonance (linac-MR) hybrid system requires accurate tumor delineation at a fast MR imaging rate. Various autocontouring methods have been previously evaluated against “gold standard” manual contours by experts. However, manually drawn contours have inherent intra- and inter-observer variations. We aim to quantify these variations and evaluate our tumor-autocontouring algorithm against the manual contours. Ten liver, ten prostate, and ten lung cancer patients were scanned using a 3 tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner with a 2D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence at 4 frames/s. Three experts manually contoured the tumor in two sessions. For autocontouring, an in-house built U-Net-based autocontouring algorithm was used, whose hyperparameters were optimized for each patient, expert, and session (PES). For evaluation, (A) Automatic vs. Manual and (B) Manual vs. Manual contour comparisons were performed. For (A) and (B), three types of comparisons were performed: (a) same expert same session, (b) same expert different session, and (c) different experts, using Dice coefficient (DC), centroid displacement (CD), and the Hausdorff distance (HD). For (A), the algorithm was trained using one expert’s contours and its autocontours were compared to contours from (a)–(c). For Automatic vs. Manual evaluations (Aa–Ac), DC = 0.91, 0.86, 0.78, CD = 1.3, 1.8, 2.7 mm, and HD = 3.1, 4.6, 7.0 mm averaged over 30 patients were achieved, respectively. For Manual vs. Manual evaluations (Ba–Bc), DC = 1.00, 0.85, 0.77, CD = 0.0, 2.1, 2.8 mm, and HD = 0.0, 4.9, 7.2 mm were achieved, respectively. We have quantified the intra- and inter-observer variations in manual contouring of liver, prostate, and lung patients. Our PES-specific optimized algorithm generated autocontours with agreement levels comparable to these manual variations, but with high efficiency (54 ms/autocontour vs. 9 s/manual contour). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning in Medical Signal and Image Processing (3rd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 4333 KB  
Article
Intrafractional Motion in Online-Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy of Adrenal Metastases Leads to Reduced Target Volume Coverage and Elevated Organ-at-Risk Doses
by Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen, Tobias P. Hartschuh, Claudia Katharina Renkamp, Carolin Buchele, Fabian Schlüter, Elisabetta Sandrini, Fabian Weykamp, Sebastian Regnery, Eva Meixner, Laila König, Jürgen Debus, Sebastian Klüter and Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1533; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091533 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1005
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is frequently used in patients with adrenal metastases. Motion of adherent radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs) and tumors influence OAR toxicity and tumor control. Online-adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) can address and mitigate interfractional changes. However, the impact of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is frequently used in patients with adrenal metastases. Motion of adherent radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs) and tumors influence OAR toxicity and tumor control. Online-adaptive Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) can address and mitigate interfractional changes. However, the impact of intrafractional variations in adrenal MRgRT is unknown. Methods: A total of 23 patients with 24 adrenal metastases were treated with MRgRT. After daily plan adaptation and before beam application, an additional (preRT) 3d MRI was acquired. PreRT target volumes and OARs were retrospectively recontoured in 200 fractions. The delivered, online-adapted treatment plans, as well as non-adapted baseline plans, were calculated on these re-contoured structures to quantify the dosimetric impact of intrafractional variations on target volume coverage and OAR doses with and without online adaptation. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were calculated. Results: The median time between the two MRIs was 56.4 min. GTV and PTV coverage (dose to 95% of the PTV, D95%, and volume covered by 100% of the prescription dose, V100%) were significantly inferior in the preRT plans. GTV Dmean was significantly impaired in left-sided metastases, but not in right-sided metastases. Compared to non-adapted preRT plans, adapted preRT plans were still significantly superior for all GTV and PTV metrics. Intrafractional violations of OAR constraints were frequent. D0.5cc and the volume exposed to the near-maximum dose constraint were significantly higher in the preRT plans. The volume exposed to the D0.5cc constraints in single fractions escalated up to 1.5 cc for the esophagus, 3.2 cc for the stomach, 5.3 cc for the duodenum and 7.3 cc for the bowel. This led to significantly elevated NTCPs for the stomach, bowel and duodenum. Neither PTV D95%, nor gastrointestinal OAR maximum doses were significantly impaired by longer fraction duration. Conclusions: Intrafractional motion in adrenal MRgRT caused significant impairment of target volume coverage (D95% and V100%), potentially undermining local control. Frequent violation of gastrointestinal OAR constraints led to elevated NTCP. Compared to non-adaptive treatment, online adaptation still highly improved GTV and PTV coverage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Tumor Ablation: Second Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 8000 KB  
Article
Patient-Specific Hyperparameter Optimization of a Deep Learning-Based Tumor Autocontouring Algorithm on 2D Liver, Prostate, and Lung Cine MR Images: A Pilot Study
by Gawon Han, Keith Wachowicz, Nawaid Usmani, Don Yee, Jordan Wong, Arun Elangovan, Jihyun Yun and B. Gino Fallone
Algorithms 2025, 18(4), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/a18040233 - 18 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1191
Abstract
Linear accelerator–magnetic resonance (linac-MR) hybrid systems allow for real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy for more accurate dose delivery to the tumor and improved sparing of the adjacent healthy tissues. However, for real-time tumor detection, it is unfeasible for a human expert to [...] Read more.
Linear accelerator–magnetic resonance (linac-MR) hybrid systems allow for real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy for more accurate dose delivery to the tumor and improved sparing of the adjacent healthy tissues. However, for real-time tumor detection, it is unfeasible for a human expert to manually contour (gold standard) the tumor at the fast imaging rate of a linac-MR. This study aims to develop a neural network-based tumor autocontouring algorithm with patient-specific hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and to validate its contouring accuracy using in vivo MR images of cancer patients. Two-dimensional (2D) intrafractional MR images were acquired at 4 frames/s using 3 tesla (T) MRI from 11 liver, 24 prostate, and 12 lung cancer patients. A U-Net architecture was applied for tumor autocontouring and was further enhanced by implementing HPO using the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy. Six hyperparameters were optimized for each patient, for which intrafractional images and experts’ manual contours were input into the algorithm to find the optimal set of hyperparameters. For evaluation, Dice’s coefficient (DC), centroid displacement (CD), and Hausdorff distance (HD) were computed between the manual contours and autocontours. The performance of the algorithm was benchmarked against two standardized autosegmentation methods: non-optimized U-Net and nnU-Net. For the proposed algorithm, the mean (standard deviation) DC, CD, and HD of the 47 patients were 0.92 (0.04), 1.35 (1.03), and 3.63 (2.17) mm, respectively. Compared to the two benchmarking autosegmentation methods, the proposed algorithm achieved the best overall performance in terms of contouring accuracy and speed. This work presents the first tumor autocontouring algorithm applicable to the intrafractional MR images of liver and prostate cancer patients for real-time tumor-tracked radiotherapy. The proposed algorithm performs patient-specific HPO, enabling accurate tumor delineation comparable to that of experts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning in Medical Signal and Image Processing (3rd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 966 KB  
Article
Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Involving Head and Neck Sites with a 1.5 T MR-Linac: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Observational Study
by Andrea Emanuele Guerini, Stefania Nici, Stefano Riga, Ludovica Pegurri, Paolo Borghetti, Eneida Mataj, Jacopo Balduzzi, Mirsada Katica, Gianluca Cossali, Giorgio Facheris, Luca Triggiani, Albert Sakiri, Luigi Spiazzi, Stefano Maria Magrini and Michela Buglione
Hematol. Rep. 2025, 17(2), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep17020016 - 27 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1618
Abstract
Purpose: Lymphomas are generally radiosensitive; therefore, disease volume tends to shrink during radiotherapy courses. As MRI-linac provides excellent soft tissue definition and allows daily re-contouring of gross tumor volume and clinical target volume, its adoption could be beneficial for the treatment of [...] Read more.
Purpose: Lymphomas are generally radiosensitive; therefore, disease volume tends to shrink during radiotherapy courses. As MRI-linac provides excellent soft tissue definition and allows daily re-contouring of gross tumor volume and clinical target volume, its adoption could be beneficial for the treatment of lymphomas. Nonetheless, at this time there is a lack of literature regarding the use of MR-linac in this context. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients affected by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) involving head and neck (H&N) sites and treated with Elekta Unity® MR-Linac. The clinical and dosimetric data of the first eight patients were collected and integrated with relevant data from medical records. Results: Seven patients had B-cell lymphoma (three DLBCL, two MALT, one follicular, and one mantle-cell) and one T-cell/NK lymphoma. The intent of RT was radical for four patients, salvage treatment for three, and CAR-T bridging for one. Two patients presented orbital localizations and six cervical lymphonodal sites. Median GTV was 5.74 cc, median CTV 127.01 cc, and median PTV 210.37 cc. The prescribed dose was 24–50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions for seven patients and 24 Gy in 3 Gy fractions for one patient. All the patients experienced acute toxicity, the maximum grade was G1 for five patients and G2 for three at the end of RT. One month after radiotherapy seven patients still experienced G1 toxicity, but no toxicity grade ≥ 2 was reported. First radiological assessment was performed for all the patients after a median of 101.5 days, reporting complete response in all the cases. After a median follow up of 330 days, no patient experienced local disease progression, while one patient developed distant progression. Conclusions: radiotherapy for NHL with H&N localization using a 1.5 T MR-linac was feasible, with no >G2 toxicity and optimal response rate and disease control. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3856 KB  
Article
Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) with Enhanced Visualization of Tumor and Hepatic Parenchyma in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Liver Malignancies
by Alexander V. Kirichenko, Danny Lee, Patrick Wagner, Seungjong Oh, Hannah Lee, Daniel Pavord, Parisa Shamsesfandabadi, Allen Chen, Lorenzo Machado, Mark Bunker, Angela Sanguino, Chirag Shah and Tadahiro Uemura
Cancers 2025, 17(7), 1088; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17071088 - 25 Mar 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1797
Abstract
Goal: This study evaluates the feasibility and outcome of a personalized MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning platform with the SPION contrast agent Ferumoxytol® (Sandoz Inc.; Princeton, NJ, USA) to maintain a superior real-time visualization of liver tumors and volumes of functional hepatic [...] Read more.
Goal: This study evaluates the feasibility and outcome of a personalized MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning platform with the SPION contrast agent Ferumoxytol® (Sandoz Inc.; Princeton, NJ, USA) to maintain a superior real-time visualization of liver tumors and volumes of functional hepatic parenchyma for radiotherapy planning throughout multi-fractionated liver SBRT with online plan adaptations on an Elekta Unity 1.5 T MR-Linac (Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden). Materials and Methods: Patients underwent SPION-enhanced MRI on the Elekta Unity MR-Linac for improved tumor and functional hepatic parenchyma visualization. An automated contouring algorithm was applied for the delineation and subsequent guided avoidance of functional liver parenchyma volumes (FLVs) on the SPION-enhanced MR-Linac. Radiation dose constraints were adapted exclusively to FLV. Local control, toxicity, and survival were assessed with at least 6-month radiographic follow-up. Pre- and post-transplant outcomes were analyzed in the subset of patients with HCC and hepatic cirrhosis who completed SBRT as a bridge to liver transplant. Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD-Na) was used to score hepatic function before and after SBRT. Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months (range: 3–40 months), 23 HCC patients (26 lesions treated) and 9 patients (14 lesions treated) with hepatic metastases received SBRT (mean dose: 48 Gy, range: 36–54 Gy) in 1–5 fractions. Nearly all patients in this study had pe-existing liver conditions, including hepatic cirrhosis (23), prior TACE (7), prior SBRT (18), or history of hepatic resection (2). Compared to the non-contrast images, SPIONs improved tumor visibility on post-SPION images on the background of negatively enhancing functionally active hepatic parenchyma. Prolonged SPION-contrast retention within hepatic parenchyma enabled per-fraction treatment adaptation throughout the entire multi-fraction treatment course. FLV loss (53%, p < 0.0001) was observed in cirrhotic patients, but functional and anatomic liver volumes remained consistent in non-cirrhotic patients. Mean dose to FLV was maintained within the liver threshold tolerance to radiation in all patients after the optimization of Step-and-Shoot Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (SS-IMRT) on the SPION-enhanced MRI-Linac. No radiation-induced liver disease was observed within 6 months post-SBRT, and the MELD-Na score in cirrhotic patients was not significantly elevated at 3-month intervals after SBRT completion. Conclusions: SPION Ferumoxytol® administered intravenously as an alternative MRI contrast agent on the day of SBRT planning produces a long-lasting contrast effect between tumors and functional hepatic parenchyma for precision targeting and guided avoidance during the entire course of liver SBRT, enabling fast and accurate online plan adaptation on the 1.5 T Elekta Unity MR-Linac. This approach demonstrates a safe and effective bridging therapy for patients with hepatic cirrhosis, leading to low toxicity and favorable transplant outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Prevention and Treatment of Liver Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3878 KB  
Article
Evolving Trends and Patterns of Utilization of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy at a Single Institution, 2018–2024
by Robert A. Herrera, Eyub Y. Akdemir, Rupesh Kotecha, Kathryn E. Mittauer, Matthew D. Hall, Adeel Kaiser, Nema Bassiri-Gharb, Noah S. Kalman, Yonatan Weiss, Tino Romaguera, Diane Alvarez, Sreenija Yarlagadda, Ranjini Tolakanahalli, Alonso N. Gutierrez, Minesh P. Mehta and Michael D. Chuong
Cancers 2025, 17(2), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17020208 - 10 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3185
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in image-guided radiotherapy (RT) particularly with the introduction of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). However, the optimal clinical applications of MRgRT are still evolving. The intent of this analysis was to describe [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in image-guided radiotherapy (RT) particularly with the introduction of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). However, the optimal clinical applications of MRgRT are still evolving. The intent of this analysis was to describe our institutional MRgRT utilization patterns and evolution therein, specifically as an early adopter within a center endowed with multiple other technology platforms. Materials/Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patterns of MRgRT utilization for patients treated with a 0.35-Tesla MR-Linac at our institution from April 2018 to April 2024. We analyzed changes in utilization across six annualized periods: Period 1 (April 2018–April 2019) through Period 6 (April 2023–April 2024). We defined ultra-hypofractionation (UHfx) as 5 or fewer fractions with a minimum fractional dose of 5 Gy. Electronic health records were reviewed, and data were extracted related to patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Results: A total of 823 treatment courses were delivered to 712 patients treated for 854 lesions. The most commonly treated sites were the pancreas (242 [29.4%]), thorax (172; 20.9%), abdominopelvic lymph nodes (107; 13.0%), liver (72; 8.7%), and adrenal glands (68; 8.3%). The median total prescribed dose of 50 Gy in five fractions (fxs) was typically delivered in consecutive days with automatic beam gating in inspiration breath hold. The median biologically effective dose (α/β = 10, BED10) was 94.4 Gy with nearly half (404, 49.1%) of all courses at a prescribed BED10 ≥ 100 Gy, which is widely regarded as a highly effective ablative dose. Courses in Period 6 vs. Period 1 more often had a prescribed BED10 ≥ 100 Gy (60.2% vs. 41.6%; p = 0.004). Of the 6036 total delivered fxs, nearly half (2643, 43.8%) required at least one fx of on-table adaptive radiotherapy (oART), most commonly for pancreatic tumors (1081, 17.9%). UHfx was used in over three quarters of all courses (630, 76.5%) with 472 (57.4%) of these requiring oART for at least one fraction. The relative utilization of oART increased significantly from Period 1 to Period 6 (37.6% to 85.0%; p < 0.001); a similar increase in the use of UHfx (66.3% to 89.5%; p < 0.001) was also observed. The median total in-room time for oART decreased from 81 min in Period 1 to 45 min in Period 6, while for non-oART, it remained stable around 40 min across all periods. Conclusions: Our institution implemented MRgRT with a priority for targeting mobile extracranial tumors in challenging anatomic locations that are frequently treated with dose escalation, require enhanced soft-tissue visualization, and could benefit from an ablative radiotherapy approach. Over the period under evaluation, the use of high-dose ablative doses (BED10 ≥ 100 Gy), oART and UHfx (including single-fraction ablation) increased significantly, underscoring both a swift learning curve and ability to optimize processes to maximize throughput and efficiency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop