Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (13)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = GAD65 vaccine

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 7092 KiB  
Article
Comparative Ability of Various Immunosuppressants as Adjuvants on the Activity of T1D Vaccine
by Xinyi Wang, Mengxin Xie, Tengjiao Li, Jiandong Shi, Meini Wu, Shihan Zhang, Jing Sun and Yunzhang Hu
Vaccines 2024, 12(10), 1117; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12101117 - 29 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1352
Abstract
Background: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by the destruction of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreatic islets, resulting from a breakdown in immunological tolerance. Currently, T1D treatment primarily relies on insulin replacement or immunosuppressive therapies. However, these approaches often [...] Read more.
Background: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by the destruction of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreatic islets, resulting from a breakdown in immunological tolerance. Currently, T1D treatment primarily relies on insulin replacement or immunosuppressive therapies. However, these approaches often have significant drawbacks, including adverse effects, high costs, and limited long-term efficacy. Consequently, there is a pressing need for innovative immunotherapeutic strategies capable of inducing antigen-specific tolerance and protecting beta cells from autoimmune destruction. Among the various antigens, β-cell antigens like 65 kDa glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) have been explored as vaccine candidates for T1D. Despite their potential, their effectiveness in humans remains modest, necessitating the use of appropriate adjuvants to enhance the vaccine’s protective effects. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of kynurenine (KYN), dexamethasone (DXMS), tacrolimus (FK506), and aluminium hydroxide (Alum) in combination with the GAD65 phage vaccine as adjuvants. Results: Our findings demonstrate that KYN, when used in conjunction with the GAD65 vaccine, significantly enhances the vaccine’s immunosuppressive effects. Compared to dexamethasone, FK506, and Alum adjuvants, KYN more effectively reduced the incidence and delayed the onset of T1D, preserved β-cell function, and promoted the induction of regulatory T cells and antigen-specific tolerance. These results suggest that KYN combined with vaccines could offer superior preventive and therapeutic benefits for T1D compared to existing treatments. Additionally, we investigated the dose-dependent effects of the GAD65 vaccine by including a low-dose group in our study. The results indicated that reducing the vaccine dose below 1010 plaque-forming units (pfu) did not confer any protective advantage or therapeutic benefit in combination with KYN. This finding underscores that 1010 pfu is the minimum effective dose for the GAD65 vaccine in achieving a protective response. In conclusion, KYN shows considerable promise as an adjuvant for the GAD65 vaccine in T1D therapy, potentially offering a more effective and durable treatment option than current immunosuppressive strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccine Design, Development, and Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1858 KiB  
Article
Links between Vaccination Fear-, Anxiety-, Alexithymia-, and Type D Personality-Related Vaccination Decisions: A Network Analysis in a Multicultural Sample
by Olga Malas, Nada Mallah Boustani, Mirko Duradoni, Dayo Omotoso, Asiye Şengül Avşar, Anastasiia Shyroka, Giulia Colombini and Maria Dolores Tolsá
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 761; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090761 - 29 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1708
Abstract
This study examines the links between vaccination status, fear of vaccination (cognitive and somatic symptoms), anxiety, alexithymia, and type D personality (negative affect and social inhibition), to propose policies to increase vaccination rates. A sample of university students (n = 2535; mean [...] Read more.
This study examines the links between vaccination status, fear of vaccination (cognitive and somatic symptoms), anxiety, alexithymia, and type D personality (negative affect and social inhibition), to propose policies to increase vaccination rates. A sample of university students (n = 2535; mean age = 20.59, SD = 2.04; male: 26.75%, female: 73.25%) from Spain, Italy, Lebanon, Nigeria, Turkey, and Ukraine completed the Vaccination Fear Scale (VFS-6), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire—Short Form (PAQ-S), the Type D Scale (DS14), and also a question on vaccination status. Correlation, regression, and network analyses were applied. Cognitive symptoms of fear of vaccination and negative affect were the most significant in the correlation and regression analyses. In the network analysis, negative affect showed the highest values in all centrality indices and positive relationships with other nodes. Vaccination status showed negative relationships with fear of vaccination, alexithymia, and social inhibition. The network structure is similar between the sexes but varies between cultures and sexes within cultures. The relationship between vaccination status and cognitive symptoms of fear of vaccination was the most consistent, allowing for interventions at this level to be advised across cultures. For more specific interventions, cultural context must be considered for optimal results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Promoting Behavioral Change to Improve Health Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2722 KiB  
Article
Development of a Potency Assay for Nous-209, a Multivalent Neoantigens-Based Genetic Cancer Vaccine
by Rosa Bartolomeo, Fulvia Troise, Simona Allocca, Giulia Sdruscia, Rosa Vitale, Veronica Bignone, Anna Maria Petrone, Giuseppina Romano, Anna Morena D’Alise, Valentino Ruzza, Irene Garzia, Guido Leoni, Rossella Merone, Francesca Lanzaro, Stefano Colloca, Loredana Siani, Elisa Scarselli and Gabriella Cotugno
Vaccines 2024, 12(3), 325; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12030325 - 19 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2639
Abstract
Quality control testing of vaccines, including potency assessment, is critical to ensure equivalence of clinical lots. We developed a potency assay to support the clinical advancement of Nous-209, a cancer vaccine based on heterologous prime/boost administration of two multivalent viral vector products: GAd-209 [...] Read more.
Quality control testing of vaccines, including potency assessment, is critical to ensure equivalence of clinical lots. We developed a potency assay to support the clinical advancement of Nous-209, a cancer vaccine based on heterologous prime/boost administration of two multivalent viral vector products: GAd-209 and MVA-209. These consist of a mix of four Adeno (Great Ape Adenovirus; GAd) and four Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vectors respectively, each containing a different transgene encoding a synthetic polypeptide composed of antigenic peptide fragments joined one after the other. The potency assay employs quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (RT-Q-PCR) to quantitatively measure the transcripts from the four transgenes encoded by each product in in vitro infected cells, enabling simultaneous detection. Results showcase the assay’s robustness and biological relevance, as it effectively detects potency loss in one component of the mixture comparably to in vivo immunogenicity testing. This report details the assay’s setup and validation, offering valuable insights for the clinical development of similar genetic vaccines, particularly those encoding synthetic polypeptides. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccine Design, Development, and Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 699 KiB  
Article
Associations of Mental Health Issues with Health Literacy and Vaccination Readiness against COVID-19 in Long-Term Care Facilities—A Cross-Sectional Analysis
by Linda Sanftenberg, Maresa Gschwendner, Andreas Grass, Marietta Rottenkolber, Isabel Zöllinger, Maria Sebastiao, Thomas Kühlein, Dagmar Hindenburg, Ildikó Gágyor, Domenika Wildgruber, Anita Hausen, Christian Janke, Michael Hoelscher, Daniel Teupser, Tobias Dreischulte, Jochen Gensichen and on behalf of the BACOM Study Group
Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2024, 14(3), 432-446; https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14030029 - 20 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2228
Abstract
Vaccinations against COVID-19 are of the utmost importance in long-term care facilities. During the pandemic, mental health issues increased significantly. This cross-sectional analysis aimed to assess the associations of depression and anxiety with health literacy in people in need of care and the [...] Read more.
Vaccinations against COVID-19 are of the utmost importance in long-term care facilities. During the pandemic, mental health issues increased significantly. This cross-sectional analysis aimed to assess the associations of depression and anxiety with health literacy in people in need of care and the association of depression and burnout with vaccination readiness against COVID-19 in health care workers (HCWs). Within our cross-sectional study, people in need of care were assessed for symptoms of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and health literacy (HLS-EU-Q16). Among HCWs, we assessed symptoms of depression (PHQ-9) and burnout (MBI-HSS), as well as psychological antecedents of vaccination (5C) to measure vaccination readiness against COVID-19. A multivariate regression analysis was performed. Symptoms of a major depression were significantly associated with reduced health literacy (p = 0.010) in people in need of care. Among HCWs, symptoms of depression and burnout reduced vaccination readiness against COVID-19 significantly. In particular, collective responsibility was reduced in HCWs suffering from burnout symptoms (p = 0.001). People in need of care and their HCWs could benefit from intensified target group-specific vaccination counseling. Additionally, more attention should be paid to the protection of mental health in long-term care facilities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Promoters and Barriers of Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 957 KiB  
Article
Mental Health and Contraceptive Knowledge in High Schoolers: Comparing Remote and In-Person Learning during COVID-19
by Denisa Hinoveanu, Doru Mihai Anastasiu, Cosmin Citu, Doru Ciprian Crisan, Zoran Laurentiu Popa, Nicoleta Nicolae, Catalin Dumitru, Oana Neda-Stepan, Roxana Manuela Fericean and Lavinia Stelea
Medicina 2023, 59(10), 1876; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101876 - 22 Oct 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2405
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on education, this study delves into the behavioral, mental health, and sexual education characteristics of high school students during 2020–2021 and 2022–2023. Materials and Methods: We evaluated a variety of factors, [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic’s effects on education, this study delves into the behavioral, mental health, and sexual education characteristics of high school students during 2020–2021 and 2022–2023. Materials and Methods: We evaluated a variety of factors, including substance use, academic performance, sexual activities, mental health support, pandemic-related anxiety levels, and quality of life indicators using standardized instruments such as the SF-36, GAD-7, and WHOQOL-BREF. Furthermore, we addressed specific questions concerning contraception and sexual education during this period. Results: The questionnaires were filled in by 44 students in 2020–2021 and 41 students in 2022–2023. Significant findings included a noteworthy increase in COVID-19 vaccination rates, from 18.2% in 2020–2021 to 39.0% in 2022–2023 (p = 0.033), enhanced perceptions of mental health support during remote learning, from 7.1% to 20.0% (p = 0.044), and a rise in students partaking in reproductive health discussions from 10.7% to 25.0% (p = 0.046). Additionally, there was a marked decline in anxiety regarding the transition back to in-person learning (p = 0.048). Health surveys, such as the SF-36, signaled improvements in both physical and mental health over the years (p = 0.046 and p = 0.019, respectively), while the GAD-7 scores depicted a considerable reduction in anxiety symptoms (p = 0.038). The WHOQOL-BREF results also highlighted a significant uptick in students’ mental well-being in 2022–2023 (p = 0.039). Conclusions: As the COVID-19 pandemic ended, high school students exhibited shifts in behavior, health, and education over four academic years, particularly in areas of contraceptive knowledge and mental health outcomes. The pronounced enhancements in vaccination rates, perceptions of mental health support, participation in health conversations, and overall mental wellness emphasize the adaptability and resilience of students in these tumultuous periods, and a general increase in contraceptive knowledge and quality of life during the end of the pandemic. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 292 KiB  
Article
Monkeypox Post-COVID-19: Knowledge, Worrying, and Vaccine Adoption in the Arabic General Population
by Sarya Swed, Haidara Bohsas, Hidar Alibrahim, Amine Rakab, Wael Hafez, Bisher Sawaf, Rais Mohammed Amir, Ahmed Sallam Motawei, Ahmed Aljabali, Sheikh Shoib, Ismail Atef Ismail Ahmed Ibrahim, Sondos Hussein Ahmad Almashaqbeh, Ebrahim Ahmed Qaid Shaddad, Maryam Alqaisi, Ahmed Abdelrahman, Sherihan Fathey, René Hurlemann, Mohamed E. G. Elsayed, Joshuan J. Barboza, Aroop Mohanty, Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales, Bijaya Kumar Padhi and Ranjit Sahadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2023, 11(4), 759; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11040759 - 29 Mar 2023
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4483
Abstract
Background: The outbreak of monkeypox was declared a global public health emergency by the World Health Organization on 23 July 2022. There have been 60,000 cases reported worldwide, most of which are in places where monkeypox has never been seen due to the [...] Read more.
Background: The outbreak of monkeypox was declared a global public health emergency by the World Health Organization on 23 July 2022. There have been 60,000 cases reported worldwide, most of which are in places where monkeypox has never been seen due to the travel of people who have the virus. This research aims to evaluate the general Arabic population in regard to the monkeypox disease, fears, and vaccine adoption after the WHO proclaimed a monkeypox epidemic and to compare these attitudes to those of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in some Arabic countries (Syria, Egypt, Qatar, Yemen, Jordan, Sudan, Algeria, and Iraq) between 18 August and 7 September 2022. The inclusion criteria were the general public residing in Arabic nations and being older than 18. This questionnaire has 32 questions separated into three sections: sociodemographic variables, prior COVID-19 exposure, and COVID-19 vaccination history. The second portion assesses the knowledge and anxieties about monkeypox, while the third section includes the generalized anxiety disorder (GAD7) scale. Logistic regression analyses were performed to compute the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their confidence intervals (95%CI) using STATA (version 17.0). Results: A total of 3665 respondents from 17 Arabic countries were involved in this study. Almost two-thirds (n = 2427, 66.2%) of the participants expressed more worry about COVID-19 than monkeypox diseases. Regarding the major cause for concern about monkeypox, 39.5% of participants attributed their anxiety to the fear that they or a member of their family may contract the illness, while 38.4% were concerned about monkeypox becoming another worldwide pandemic. According to the GAD 7 score, 71.7% of the respondents showed very low anxiety toward monkeypox and 43.8% of the participants scored poor levels of knowledge about monkeypox disease. Participants with previous COVID-19 infection showed a 1.206 times greater acceptance to receive the monkeypox vaccine than those with no previous infection. A 3.097 times higher concern for monkeypox than COVID-19 was shown by the participants who perceived monkeypox as dangerous and virulent than those who did not. Participants who have a chronic disease (aOR: 1.32; 95%CI: 1.09–1.60); participants worried about monkeypox (aOR: 1.21; 95%CI: 1.04–1.40), and perceived monkeypox as a dangerous and virulent disease (aOR: 2.25; 95%CI: 1.92–2.65); and excellent knowledge level (aOR: 2.28; 95%CI: 1.79–2.90) have emerged as significant predictors. Conclusions: Our study reported that three-fourths of the participants were more concerned about COVID-19 than monkeypox disease. In addition, most of the participants have inadequate levels of knowledge regarding monkeypox disease. Hence, immediate action should be taken to address this problem. Consequently, learning about monkeypox and spreading information about its prevention is crucial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Monkeypox Virus Infection: Analysis and Detection)
15 pages, 1031 KiB  
Article
Exploring Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Uptake, and Hesitancy in the Pediatric Population: A Study of Parents and Caregivers in Saudi Arabia during the Initial Vaccination Phase
by Abdullah N. Alhuzaimi, Abdullah A. Alrasheed, Ayman Al-Eyadhy, Fadi Aljamaan, Khalid Alhasan, Mohammed A. Batais, Amr Jamal, Fatimah S. Alshahrani, Shuliweeh Alenezi, Ali Alhaboob, Fahad AlZamil, Yaser Y. Bashumeel, Ahmad M. Banaeem, Abdulrahman Aldawood, Rabih Halwani, Mazin Barry, Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq and Mohamad-Hani Temsah
Healthcare 2023, 11(7), 972; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11070972 - 29 Mar 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2857
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to assess COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, uptake, and hesitancy among parents and caregivers of children in Saudi Arabia during the initial rollout of pediatric COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: An electronic survey was used to collect data from participants who visited a [...] Read more.
Objectives: This study aims to assess COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, uptake, and hesitancy among parents and caregivers of children in Saudi Arabia during the initial rollout of pediatric COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: An electronic survey was used to collect data from participants who visited a COVID-19 vaccine center. The survey included demographic data, COVID-19 vaccine status among participants and their children, and reasons for vaccine acceptance or rejection. The Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS) tool was also employed to assess vaccine hesitancy and attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine and routine childhood vaccination. Multivariate binary regression analysis was used to identify predictors of actual COVID-19 vaccine uptake among children. Results: Of the 873 respondents included in the analysis, 61.5% were parents and 38.5% were other caregivers. Of the participants, 96.9% had received the COVID-19 vaccine. Six hundred and ninety-four participants accepted the vaccine for their children, with the main reasons being an endorsement by the Saudi Ministry of Health (60%) and the importance of going back to school (55%). One hundred and seventy-nine participants would not vaccinate their children, with the most common reasons being fear of adverse effects (49%) and inadequate data about vaccine safety (48%). Factors such as age, COVID-19 vaccination status, self-rated family commitment level, attitudes toward routine children’s vaccines, and participants’ generalized anxiety disorder (GAD7) score did not significantly correlate with children’s COVID-19 vaccination status. Parents were less likely to vaccinate their children compared to other caregivers, and participants with a higher socioeconomic status were more likely to vaccinate their children. Conclusion: Vaccine acceptance and uptake were high during the initial pediatric COVID-19 vaccination rollout in Saudi Arabia. Still, the ongoing endorsement of the Ministry of Health and healthcare authorities should continue to advocate for better vaccine uptake in children. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Coronaviruses (CoV) and COVID-19 Pandemic)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 561 KiB  
Article
Comparison of General Anxiety among Healthcare Professionals before and after COVID-19 Vaccination
by Zohair Ali Badami, Hareem Mustafa, Afsheen Maqsood, Soha Aijaz, Sara Altamash, Abhishek Lal, Sara Saeed, Naseer Ahmed, Rahima Yousofi, Artak Heboyan and Mohmed Isaqali Karobari
Vaccines 2022, 10(12), 2076; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10122076 - 5 Dec 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2584
Abstract
Vaccination plays a crucial role in controlling the rate of coronavirus transmission and infectivity. Healthcare professionals are, in fact, at the greatest risk of contracting coronavirus due to their proximity and prolonged exposure to infected patients; this certitude alone enhances the stress and [...] Read more.
Vaccination plays a crucial role in controlling the rate of coronavirus transmission and infectivity. Healthcare professionals are, in fact, at the greatest risk of contracting coronavirus due to their proximity and prolonged exposure to infected patients; this certitude alone enhances the stress and anxiety among patients and professionals alike. In this study, we aimed to assess the levels of anxiety experienced by healthcare professionals in their practices before and after getting vaccinated. This cross-sectional study was carried out in 2021. An electronic survey was distributed among the non-vaccinated and vaccinated healthcare workers. The survey consisted of the following parts: demographic characteristics, coronavirus-related questions, questions related to the specific field of healthcare professions, general anxiety questions, and working-hour-related questions. The Modified General Anxiety Scale (GAD-7) was used along with the paired t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Spearmen’s test for comparison. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 798 healthcare professionals participated in the study. In this study, the majority of participants were females, with 598 (74.9%) being between the ages of 21 and 30, and 646 (80.9%) participants were graduates, with the majority being dentists. Non-vaccinated healthcare professionals had severe anxiety (30.9%), whereas, in vaccinated participants, anxiety levels were minimal (56.9%). A statistically significant correlation was discovered when comparing the scores of the vaccinated and non-vaccinated individuals as well as when comparing the professions of vaccinated participants, whereas no association was found with the gender and education level of participants. Vaccination is necessary for all entitled individuals to control the spread of coronavirus. It was discovered that there was an increase in anxiety levels before the vaccination was introduced. The anxiousness was greatly lessened following mass immunizations. Our research will help to raise public awareness of stigmatized mental health disorders in the healthcare industry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5102 KiB  
Article
Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Fear of Coronavirus Vaccination Scale in the Prospective Study among a Representative Sample of Polish, Israeli, Slovenian, and German Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Dominika Ochnik, Aleksandra M. Rogowska, Joy Benatov and Ana Arzenšek
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11587; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811587 - 14 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2542
Abstract
Although concerns about harm and side effects are among the most important factors determining vaccine hesitancy, research on the fear of vaccination is sparse. The purpose of this study is a validation the Fear of Coronavirus Vaccination Scale (FoCVVS), adapted from the Fear [...] Read more.
Although concerns about harm and side effects are among the most important factors determining vaccine hesitancy, research on the fear of vaccination is sparse. The purpose of this study is a validation the Fear of Coronavirus Vaccination Scale (FoCVVS), adapted from the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. A representative sample of 1723 young adults aged 20–40 from Poland, Israel, Slovenia, and Germany participated during two time-points of the third COVID-19 pandemic wave. The online survey included demographic variables and several well-being dimensions, including gender, vaccination status, fear of coronavirus (FoCV-19S), physical health (GSRH), life satisfaction (SWLS), and perceived stress (PSS-10), anxiety (GAD-7), and depression (PHQ-9). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed at T1, and confirmatory analysis (CFA) at T2. The second-order two-factor structure demonstrated the best fit and very good discriminant and convergent validation. The general factor of the FoCVVS included two subscales assessing the emotional and physiological symptoms of fear of vaccination. Unvaccinated people showed higher levels of fear of vaccination than those vaccinated. A vaccination status, fear of vaccination T1, and fear of COVID-19 T1 were significant predictors of fear of vaccination T2. Vaccination-promoting programs should be focused on decreasing fear and enhancing the beneficial effects of vaccination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1813 KiB  
Article
Prevalence Estimates and Risk Factors of Anxiety among Healthcare Workers in Jordan over One Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study
by Ahmed Yassin, Abdel-Hameed Al-Mistarehi, Khalid El-Salem, Reema A. Karasneh, Sayer Al-Azzam, Aref A. Qarqash, Aws G. Khasawneh, Anas M. Zein Alaabdin and Ola Soudah
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(5), 2615; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052615 - 24 Feb 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3068
Abstract
This study investigates the changes in prevalence estimates, severity, and risk factors of anxiety among healthcare workers (HCWs) over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey was distributed among HCWs using snowball sampling, collecting their socio-demographics, occupation, and anxiety symptoms as [...] Read more.
This study investigates the changes in prevalence estimates, severity, and risk factors of anxiety among healthcare workers (HCWs) over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey was distributed among HCWs using snowball sampling, collecting their socio-demographics, occupation, and anxiety symptoms as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale. It was distributed one month after the pandemic’s onset in Jordan between 15 and 30 April 2020 (onset group) and after one year between 15 and 30 March 2021 (one-year group). A total of 422 HCWs were included (211 in each group). The one-year group reported a higher risk of GAD (30.8% vs. 16.6%; p = 0.001), a higher mean (SD) GAD-7 score (7.94 (5.29) vs. 6.15 (4.15); p < 0.001), and more severe symptoms (p = 0.003). Univariate analyses showed that participants who were younger, women, unmarried, had lower monthly incomes, underwent testing for COVID-19, had higher contact with COVID-19 patients, did not receive special education, and were unsatisfied with the institutional COVID-19 preparedness scored higher on the GAD-7 scale and had more severe symptoms than their counterparts in both groups. Unlike the onset group, occupation as a physician, COVID-19 infection history, and perception of remarkable changes in work were associated with higher anxiety scores and severity among the one-year group. The COVID-19 vaccine was a relative protective action. Logistic regression analyses showed that the female gender was a risk factor for developing GAD at the pandemic onset, while poor satisfaction with institutional preparedness was a significant GAD risk factor in the one-year group. Low monthly income and lack of special education were the shared risk factors for GAD in both groups. This study reveals a significant rise in anxiety among HCWs over a year of the COVID-19 pandemic and shows the vulnerable sub-groups who likely need psychological interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Burden of COVID-19 in Different Countries)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 269 KiB  
Article
Impact of Vaccination on the Sense of Security, the Anxiety of COVID-19 and Quality of Life among Polish. A Nationwide Online Survey in Poland
by Mateusz Babicki, Wojciech Malchrzak, Anna Hans-Wytrychowska and Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas
Vaccines 2021, 9(12), 1444; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121444 - 7 Dec 2021
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 3809
Abstract
The pandemic state has a destructive effect on the human psyche and induces fear for one’s own health. By reducing the risk of severe COVID-19, vaccination may indirectly improve the mental state. This study aims to assess the effects of vaccination on respondents’ [...] Read more.
The pandemic state has a destructive effect on the human psyche and induces fear for one’s own health. By reducing the risk of severe COVID-19, vaccination may indirectly improve the mental state. This study aims to assess the effects of vaccination on respondents’ mental well-being, their attitudes towards adherence to government recommendations limiting viral transmission, and to identify factors that may influence the decision to get vaccinated. The survey took the form of the authors’ own, fully voluntary, anonymous, online questionnaire. Standardised psychometric tools were used in the survey: Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) and Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). The survey involved 1696 respondents, the vast majority of whom were women, and were aged 18–29. The vaccination status was declared by 1677 respondents (98.9%), 430 (25.4%) of whom were vaccinated with at least one dose of vaccine, while 303 (17.9%) respondents were not only unvaccinated at all, and declared no intention to get vaccinated in the future. Fully vaccinated individuals were found to have lower levels of anxiety, higher MANSA scores and lower subjective anxiety about being infected with COVID-19 than those awaiting vaccination or those with an incomplete vaccination regimen (one dose). Those who are not willing to get vaccinated have the lowest sense of anxiety and fear of being infected and they have the lowest adherence to government recommendations limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination reduces the level of anxiety about being infected and anxiety due to COVID-19 disease in people from the immediate environment. Those who are not willing to get vaccinated have extreme attitudes that negate the pandemic as a whole, including the need for COVID-19 vaccination. Fully vaccinated individuals still adhere to the SARS-CoV-2 prevention policies in place. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
13 pages, 2476 KiB  
Article
Impact of Anxiety on Readiness for COVID-19 Vaccination among Polish Nursing Undergraduate Students: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study
by Joanna Gotlib, Mariusz Jaworski, Dominik Wawrzuta, Tomasz Sobierajski and Mariusz Panczyk
Vaccines 2021, 9(12), 1385; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9121385 - 24 Nov 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3878
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic had a huge impact on the mental health of people around the world, and it increased the level of fear of infection and anxiety about the consequences of the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We examined the relationship between [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic had a huge impact on the mental health of people around the world, and it increased the level of fear of infection and anxiety about the consequences of the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We examined the relationship between the level of anxiety among nursing students and their knowledge about COVID-19 vaccination. In addition, we explored the correlations among the level of anxiety, knowledge about vaccination, and the willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. A total of 790 undergraduate nursing students participated in the study. The results demonstrated that the level of anxiety among the surveyed nursing students was low; 40% of the study participants did not report any anxiety at all, 30% reported mild anxiety, 20% reported moderate anxiety, and 9% reported severe anxiety. At the time of the study, 77.2% of the participants were already vaccinated against COVID-19. Student knowledge about vaccination against COVID-19 was high and anxiety levels were low, with no direct correlation between the knowledge of vaccination and the severity of anxiety. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 841 KiB  
Article
Follow-Up Survey of the Impact of COVID-19 on People Living with HIV during the Second Semester of the Pandemic
by Joseph Nelson Siewe Fodjo, Edlaine Faria de Moura Villela, Stijn Van Hees, Pieter Vanholder, Patrick Reyntiens and Robert Colebunders
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(9), 4635; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094635 - 27 Apr 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 3538
Abstract
COVID-19 affects persons living with HIV (PLWH) both directly (via morbidity/mortality) and indirectly (via disruption of HIV care). From July–November 2020, an online survey was conducted to investigate the psychosocial well-being of PLWH and changes in HIV care during the second semester of [...] Read more.
COVID-19 affects persons living with HIV (PLWH) both directly (via morbidity/mortality) and indirectly (via disruption of HIV care). From July–November 2020, an online survey was conducted to investigate the psychosocial well-being of PLWH and changes in HIV care during the second semester of the COVID-19 outbreak. Data were collected on the socio-demographic characteristics of PLWH, their psychosocial well-being, impact of COVID-19 preventive measures on their daily routines and HIV follow-up. Of the 247 responses analyzed (mean age: 44.5 ± 13.2 years; 73.7% male), 67 (27.1%) and 69 (27.9%) respondents screened positive for anxiety (GAD-2 score ≥ 3) and depression (PHQ-2 score ≥ 3), respectively. HIV care had returned to pre-COVID-19 state for 48.6% PLWH, and 108 (43.7%) had no HIV follow-up during the past month. Over three quarters (76.1%) of respondents expressed willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Compared to previous findings in April 2020, substance use increased from 58.6% to 67.2% (p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that the well-being and medical follow-up of PLWH are still affected after almost a year into the COVID-19 outbreak. Remote HIV follow-up (telemedicine) with psychosocial support should be envisaged in the medium to long-term. Given that most PLWH accept COVID-19 vaccination, they may be prioritized for this intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue HIV Prevention and Mental Health Disparities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop