Search Results (57)

Background/Objectives: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective anti-integrin monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While clinical trials have demonstrated a favorable safety profile, real-world studies are essential for identifying rare adverse events (AEs) and evaluating post-marketing safety. This study assessed vedolizumab’s safety in a real-world cohort and supported the detection of potential safety signals. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on adult IBD patients treated with vedolizumab at a tertiary center in the Republic of Serbia between October 2021 and August 2022. Data included demographics, AEs, and newly reported extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates were calculated per 100 patient-years (PYs). Disproportionality analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was performed to identify safety signals, employing reporting odds ratios (RORs) and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for AEs also observed in the cohort. Prior IBD therapies and reasons for discontinuation were evaluated. Results: A total of 107 patients (42.1% Crohn’s disease, 57.9% ulcerative colitis) were included, with a median vedolizumab exposure of 605 days. There were 92 AEs (56.51/100 PYs), most frequently infections (23.95/100 PYs), gastrointestinal disorders (4.30/100 PYs), and skin disorders (4.30/100 PYs). The most frequently reported preferred terms (PTs) included COVID-19, COVID-19 pneumonia, nephrolithiasis, and nasopharyngitis. Arthralgia (12.90/100 PYs) was the most frequent newly reported EIM. No discontinuations due to vedolizumab AEs occurred. FAERS analysis revealed potential signals for events not listed in prescribing information but observed in the cohort: nephrolithiasis, abdominal pain, diarrhea, malaise, cholangitis, gastrointestinal infection, blood pressure decreased, weight decreased, female genital tract fistula, respiratory symptom, and appendicectomy. Most patients had received three prior therapies, often stopping one due to AEs. Conclusions: Vedolizumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile in the IBD cohort. However, FAERS-identified signals, such as nephrolithiasis, gastrointestinal infections, and decreased blood pressure, warrant further investigation in larger, more diverse populations. Full article

Objective: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and life-threatening disease. Adverse events (AEs) related to its drug treatment seriously damaged the patient’s health. This study aims to clarify the causal relationship between PAH drugs and these AEs by combining pharmacovigilance signal detection with the Bayesian causal network model. Methods: Patient data were obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), covering reports from 2013 to 2023. In accordance with standard pharmacovigilance methodologies, disproportionality analysis was performed to detect signals. Target drugs were selected based on the following criteria: number of reports (a) ≥ 3, proportional reporting ratio (PRR) ≥ 2, and chi-square (χ²) ≥ 4. Bayesian causal network models were then constructed to estimate causal relationships. The do-calculus and adjustment formula were applied to calculate the causal effects between drugs and AEs. Results: Signal detection revealed that Ambrisentan, Bosentan, and Iloprost were associated with serious AEs, including death, dyspnea, pneumonia, and edema. For Ambrisentan, the top-ranked adverse drug events (ADEs) based on average causal effect (ACE) were peripheral swelling (ACE = 0.032) and anemia (ACE = 0.021). For Iloprost, the most prominent ADE was hyperthyroidism (ACE = 0.048). Conclusions: This study quantifies causal drug–event relationships in PAH using Bayesian causal networks. The findings offer valuable evidence regarding the clinical safety of PAH medications, thereby improving patient health outcomes. Full article

Background: Depression, a major global health issue, is commonly treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Given the link between depression and inflammation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may have adjunctive benefits. Clinically, SSRIs and NSAIDs are often co-prescribed for comorbid pain or inflammatory conditions. However, both drug classes pose risks of adverse effects, and their interaction may lead to clinically significant drug–drug interactions. Objectives: This study analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data (2004–2024) to assess gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury (AKI) potential risks linked to SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, and sertraline) and NSAIDs (propionic/acetic/enolic acid derivatives, COX-2 inhibitors) in depression patients, alone and combined. Methods: Disproportionality analysis (crude reporting odds ratios, cROR) identified possible associations; drug interactions were evaluated using Ω shrinkage, additive, multiplicative, and combination risk ratio (CRR) models. Results: Gastrointestinal bleeding risk was potentially elevated with citalopram (cROR = 2.81), escitalopram (2.27), paroxetine (2.17), fluvoxamine (3.58), sertraline (1.69), and propionic acid NSAIDs (3.17). Thrombocytopenia showed a potential correlation with fluoxetine (2.11) and paroxetine (2.68). AKI risk may be increased with citalopram (1.39), escitalopram (1.36), fluvoxamine (3.24), and COX-2 inhibitors (2.24). DDI signal analysis suggested that citalopram in combination with propionic acid derivatives (additive model = 0.01, multiplicative model = 1.14, and CRR = 3.13) might increase the risk of bleeding. Paroxetine combined with NSAIDs (additive model = 0.014, multiplicative model = 2.65, and CRR = 2.99) could potentially increase the risk of thrombocytopenia. Sertraline combined with NSAIDs (Ω₀₂₅ = 0.94, multiplicative model = 2.14) might be associated with an increasing risk of AKI. Citalopram combined with propionic acid derivatives (Ω₀₂₅ = 1.08, multiplicative model = 2.17, and CRR = 2.42) could be associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury. Conclusions: Certain combinations of SSRIs and NSAIDs might further elevate these risks of gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury in patients with depression. Given the potential drug–drug interactions, heightened clinical vigilance is advised when prescribing SSRIs and NSAIDs in combination to patients with depression. Full article

Vitiligo, an autoimmune disorder causing depigmented skin patches, includes two types, segmental (SV) and non-segmental (NSV). Previously, NSV was off-label treated using Calcineurine inhibitors (Tacrolimus and Pimecrolimus). In 2022, the FDA approved Ruxolitinib cream, targeting the JAK/STAT pathway for NSV treatment based on promising results. This research conducts a retrospective descriptive safety assessment of Tacrolimus, Pimecrolimus, and Ruxolitinib safety in vitiligo treatment, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database spanning the period from 2013 to 2023 and including patients aged 2 years and above, encompassing both brand and generic names. A total of 844 adverse event reports involving 388 patients were extracted and categorized into dermatological and systemic groups for analysis. Tacrolimus resulted in 12 hospitalizations, two life-threatening events, and four disabilities. Pimecrolimus exhibited urticaria and pigmentation disorders, with tooth fracture as the primary systemic event. Pericarditis was the predominant systemic side effect of Ruxolitinib, followed by anemia, headache, and urosepsis. Local dermatological side effects reported were generally mild, not warranting treatment cessation. In conclusion, vitiligo significantly impacts patients’ psychological well-being, necessitating continuous post-marketing safety monitoring for topical medications. Full article

Background: Finasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor, is used for androgenetic alopecia and benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, concerns have emerged about its psychiatric side effects, including suicidality. This study analyzed finasteride-related reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify potential safety signals. Methods: Adverse events reported from 2015 to 2024 were extracted using preferred terms, quantified using Bayesian analysis and disproportionality metrics, including empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM), information component (IC), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Results: Most were male (87%), with 43% aged 18–40 years, primarily using finasteride for hair loss. Disproportionality metrics for suicidality-related events fluctuated between 2019 and 2024. In 2019, the ROR was 27.51 (95% CI: 23.22–32.58), the PRR was 21.96 (95% CI: 18.54–26.01), the EBGM was 20.50, and the IC was 4.36. A slight decline was observed in 2020, a surge in 2021, and a peak in 2022 (ROR 34.64 (95% CI: 28.36–41.88), PRR 27.82 (95% CI: 22.30–34.61), EBGM 24.96, IC 4.64). Although a sharp rise in suicidality reports was noted in 2024, the rates of ROR and PRR dropped to 19.04 (95% CI: 17.02–21.30) and 16.53 (95% CI: 14.78–18.50), respectively. Serious outcomes such as disability (18.7%), life-threatening events (12.9%), and death (7.5%) were also noted. Conclusions: The upward trend in suicidality-related safety signals among young male users since 2019, which peaked in 2024, reflects emerging safety concerns among finasteride users, reinforcing the need for pharmacovigilance. Collaborative action among healthcare professionals, regulatory authorities, and pharmaceutical companies, along with clear warnings and mental health assessments before and throughout finasteride therapy, can mitigate potential psychiatric risks and enhance patient safety. Full article

Introduction: In the past decade, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and lymphoma, but it is associated with significant cardiovascular adverse effects. We aim to analyze the incidence, patterns, and outcomes of cardiac events in RRMM and lymphoma patients undergoing CAR-T therapy utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, paving the way for future research and being more vigilant in treating high-risk populations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective post-marketing pharmacovigilance inquiry using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MEDRA). We examined the adverse effects associated with CAR-T and TCE since their FDA approval in US and non-US populations (accessed 5 January 2024), and we analyzed the incidence of cardiac events related to six CAR-T products: Idecabtagene vicleucel, Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, Axicabtagene ciloleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, Lisocabtagene maraleucel, and Brexucabtagene autoleucel since FDA approval. Cardiotoxicities were assessed, including coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), arrhythmia, heart failure, and hypotension. Results: Out of 12,949 adverse events, we identified 675 (5.2%) cardiac events irrespective of severity. Almost 440 (65%) cardiac events were associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The most common cardiotoxic event was atrial fibrillation (122), followed by the development of heart failure (113), ventricular arrhythmia (108), hypotension (87), and bradyarrhythmia (41). The mortality rate was highest among Brexucabtagene autoleucel recipients (n = 26, 2.3%), followed by Tisagenlecleucel (n = 71, 2.1%) and Lisocabtagene maraleucel (n = 10, 2.1%). Conclusions: CAR-T therapy can result in fatal adverse events due to its cardiotoxic properties. Timely monitoring, such as screening echocardiography and electrocardiograms, can help identify the at-risk population and allow for early intervention—particularly in patients with high baseline cardiovascular risk or previous exposure to cardiotoxic agents—thereby improving outcomes by enabling risk stratification and supportive management. Full article

Introduction: The combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) has significantly improved survival in melanoma patients with BRAF V600 mutations. However, these agents can cause cardiovascular (CV) toxicity, compromising efficacy. This study evaluated the CV adverse events (cAEs) associated with BRAF/MEKi using the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify new signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs). Methods: Descriptive and disproportionality analyses were conducted on reports listing dabrafenib (D), vemurafenib (V), encorafenib (E), trametinib (T), cobimetinib (C), or binimetinib (B) as suspects in monotherapy or combination therapy (D + T, V + C, E + B), with melanoma as the indication and at least one cAE. Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) related to cAEs, including bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias, cardiac failure, cardiomyopathy, thrombotic events, ischaemic heart disease, and myocarditis/pericarditis, were analyzed. Results: Of the 14,077,067 reports retrieved, 18,370 (0.1%) were linked to BRAF/MEKi, with 1591 (8.7%) reporting cAEs, primarily in combination therapy (n = 1268). Disproportionality analysis identified 64 clinically relevant SDRs, most of which were unexpected. Notable findings included bradyarrhythmias, such as QT prolongation with D + T (n = 59; Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR = 5.09, 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 3.94–6.58), cardiac failure with V + C (29; 3.76, 2.6–5.42), and tachyarrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation with D + T (99; 2.37, 1.94–2.89). Among embolic and thrombotic events, clinically significant SDRs were observed for disseminated intravascular coagulation with D + T (38; 10.22, 7.42–14.06) and pulmonary embolism with V + C (22; 2.79, 1.83–4.24). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the need for comprehensive CV monitoring in patients receiving BRAF/MEKi therapy to prevent or detect cAEs early and reduce treatment-related risks, particularly in high-risk populations. Full article

Background/Objectives: Bradycardia, an uncharacteristically low heart rate below 60 bpm, is a commonly reported adverse drug event (ADE) in individuals administered dexmedetomidine for sedation. Dexmedetomidine is frequently used as a sedative and analgesic for both intubated and non-intubated patients due to its low risk of respiratory depression. The purpose of this study was to further characterize the safety profile of dexmedetomidine using safety reports collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and transcriptomic data. Methods: Association rule mining was used to both identify additional ADEs that presented concurrently with bradycardia in patients sedated with dexmedetomidine, as well as to characterize potential drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Furthermore, public transcriptomic data were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes that may elucidate the genetic drivers of elevated bradycardia risk in those administered dexmedetomidine. Results: Bradycardia was the most frequently reported ADE for individuals administered dexmedetomidine. Other cardiovascular-related ADEs commonly associated with bradycardia included syncope (lift = 4.711), loss of consciousness (lift = 3.997), cardiac arrest (lift = 2.850), and hypotension (lift = 2.770). Several possible DDIs were identified, including Lactated Ringer’s solution (lift = 5.441), bupivacaine (lift = 2.984), and risperidone (lift = 2.434), which may elevate bradycardia risk. Finally, eight genes related to cardiac muscle contraction were identified as possible regulators of dexmedetomidine-induced bradycardia, including COX5B, COX6A2, COX8B, MYH7, MYH6, MYL2, UQCRQ, and UQCR11 in mouse cardiac cells. Conclusions: Key clinical takeaways include the co-presentation of multiple cardiovascular ADEs, including cardiac arrest, hypotension, and syncope, alongside dexmedetomidine-associated bradycardia. Furthermore, several possible DDIs with dexmedetomidine were also identified. Full article

Background/Objectives: The nephrotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has been recognized but lacks a comprehensive analysis. We conducted an in-depth investigation of renal adverse events (rAEs) associated with ICIs and different acid-suppressing agents (ASAs)—including PPIs, histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H₂RAs), and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs)—using real-world data from the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We analyzed rAE reports from the FAERS database covering Q1 2004 to Q1 2023. Disproportionality analysis was conducted to identify rAEs associated with ICI or ASA monotherapy or combination therapy. Univariate logistic regression was employed to explore influencing factors. Results: No eligible rAE reports were retrieved for H₂RAs and P-CABs. However, 6,775 reports in the ICI group, 54,055 reports in the PPI group, and 210 reports in the ICI–PPI combination therapy group were included in the final analysis. In PPI–ICI combination settings, tubulointerstitial nephritis had the highest reporting frequency and signal intensity; the overall risk of rAEs was significantly elevated compared to ICI or PPI monotherapy, with reporting odds ratios of 14. 65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.93–16.58) and 3.24 (95% CI 2.87–3.66), respectively; the median onset time was shortest at 21 days (interquartile range 5.5–135); and PD-1 monotherapy, omeprazole, and rabeprazole were associated with higher rAE risks. Conclusions: Our findings confirm that the combination of PPIs (but not other ASAs) with ICIs further increases the risk of various acute and chronic rAEs. Healthcare providers should exercise caution when managing patients on these therapies. Full article

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for gastric acid suppression, yet their efficacy and safety in neonates and infants remain unclear. While esomeprazole is the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved PPI for neonates and infants under 1 year of age, other PPIs are also frequently prescribed. Objectives: This study utilizes FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data to evaluate potential adverse drug events (ADEs) of PPIs, providing crucial real-world insights into their safety in this vulnerable population. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted using an individual case safety report (ICSR) database. Only reports in neonates or infants receiving omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, or esomeprazole monotherapy were evaluated. The most frequently prescribed PPI, the most common indication, the most reported ADE, the seriousness of AEs, and the countries reporting the highest ADE number were analyzed using 2D disproportionality analyses (e.g., reporting odds ratio (RORs)). Results: A total of 464 patients were included; 323 (69.6%) of them were stated as serious and 15 (3.2%) of them were stated as time-related to mortality. Most of the ADEs were reported for lansoprazole (45.9%). The most reported PPI-associated ADE was vomiting (8.8%). According to the RORs analysis, vomiting associated with PPI monotherapy was more likely to occur (RORs: 2.88, 95% CI: 2.09–3.96), which is followed by diarrhea, hypertrichosis, choking, and erythema. Additionally, medication errors were reported in 50 (10.8%) patients. Conclusions: ICSR databases are valuable pharmacovigilance tools. The absence of access to a causality assessment is a limitation since it limits its ability to confirm whether the ADEs are truly caused by the suspected drug, mitigated using RORs analysis. Integrating neonatal-specific algorithms could enhance drug safety evaluations, strengthen evidence-based decision-making, and improve risk–benefit assessments in neonates and infants. Full article

Background: Recent drug enforcement activities have possibly suggested the presence of some calcium channel blocker antihypertensives in association with cocaine. The seizure revealed the possibility that the two drugs might have been used together for some unknown reasons. Methods: Hence, this study aimed at investigating the nature and frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in association with the concomitant use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and cocaine, using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Results: After removing duplicate reports, a total of 67 cases involving concomitant use of cocaine and CCBs were analyzed and were stratified into three groups based on the CCB involved: verapamil (n = 19), diltiazem (n = 30), and amlodipine (n = 18). Logistic regression analysis identified “product use for unknown indication” (β = 0.33) as the strongest predictor of fatal outcomes. Age revealed a modest negative association with fatal outcome (β = −0.93, intercept = 4.07). Concomitant substance use was reported in over 84% of cases. Frequently co-used substances included opioids, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antihistamines, and alcohol. Poly-drug use was most pronounced in the diltiazem group, which exhibited the highest burden of opioid and alcohol co-exposure. Conclusions: It is here suggested that clinicians should exercise caution when managing individuals who use cocaine, due to the potential for increased toxicity and lethality when CCBs are co-used, either as part of a prescribed treatment or if CCBs are present as adulterants in cocaine. Full article

The adverse effects of protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) and other anticancer therapies were compared using FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) data. The dataset included 159 FDA-approved anticancer drugs (71 PKIs, 88 nonPKIs) and analyzed 8216 unique adverse event (AE) terms. PKIs showed fewer systemic toxicities, with an average of 230.1 distinct AEs per drug, compared to 537.7 in nonPKIs. Hematologic AEs were significantly lower in PKIs (e.g., febrile neutropenia: 1.93% vs. 5.25%; thrombocytopenia: 2.18% vs. 3.87%), coupled with a lower incidence of infections (6.87% vs. 14.2%) and immunosuppressive effects. However, gastrointestinal and skin-related AEs were more common in PKIs (e.g., diarrhea: 13.95% vs. 8.36%). A higher proportion AEs in the PKI group (14.57%) were classified under “Investigations”, compared to the nonPKI group (9.87%). The frequency of “Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders” AEs was twice as high in the PKI group. Clustering analysis grouped drugs by AE profiles, showing that PKIs formed more homogeneous clusters, while nonPKIs had broader variability. Multi-kinase inhibitors with VEGFR activity were linked to dermatologic AEs, likely due to EGFR inhibition in basal keratinocytes. Despite PKIs’ targeted mechanisms, resistance remains a challenge, requiring biomarker-driven strategies. This study highlights PKIs’ improved tolerability but emphasizes using personalized treatment approaches to optimize efficacy and safety. Full article

Background/Objectives: Controversy exists over the use of passive reporting systems, especially the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, in risk assessment. One limitation of these systems is that adverse event (AE) reporting rates cannot be calculated without knowing the number of shots administered or prescriptions in the case of pharmaceuticals. Adverse event reporting rates can be a factor in a risk assessment, though they should not be solely relied on; they can be used to compare the relative safety profiles of different vaccine products or pharmaceuticals. This study introduces the Denominator-Adjusted Rate Estimates of Substance Adverse Events Frequency Evaluation (DARE-SAFE) method to analyze pharmacovigilance reporting rates for vaccines and common pharmaceuticals. Methods: We calculated reporting rates for the top 250 most prescribed drugs in the US Food and Drug Association (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System and common vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. For vaccines, we used USA Centers for Disease Control (CDC) dose data and OpenVAERS reports. For pharmaceuticals, we utilized prescription data from ClinCalc and FAERS reports for 2022. Results: VAERS reporting rates varied significantly across vaccine types. COVID-19 vaccines showed a 63.0 ± 0.6 times higher rate of VAERS deaths per dose and an 18.95 ± 0.02 times higher rate of total adverse event reports per dose compared to influenza vaccines. The ratio of total VAERS reports to deaths for vaccines was 73 ± 4 to 1 (R² = 0.94). For pharmaceuticals, the ratio of total adverse event reports to deaths was 26 ± 2 (R² = 0.46), with a strong correlation between serious adverse events and deaths (ratio 9.1 ± 0.3, R² = 0.79). Conclusions: DARE-SAFE provides a standardized method for comparing reporting rates across different medical products. The observed differences between vaccines and pharmaceuticals, as well as among different vaccine types, warrant further investigation into reporting practices, actual safety profiles, and potential biases in surveillance systems. Full article

Background: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare but serious adverse event. Herein, we conducted a quantitative structure–activity relationship analysis using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Drug Reaction Database System (FAERS) and machine learning to construct a drug prediction model for MRONJ induction based solely on chemical structure information. Methods: A total of 4815 drugs from FAERS were evaluated, including 70 and 139 MRONJ-positive and MRONJ-negative drugs, respectively, identified based on reporting odds ratios, Fisher’s exact tests, and ≥100 total adverse event reports. Then, we calculated 326 chemical structure descriptors for each drug and compared three supervised learning algorithms (random forest, gradient boosting, and artificial neural networks). We also compared the number of chemical structure descriptors (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, and 30 descriptors). Results: We indicated that the MRONJ prediction model using an artificial neural network algorithm and eight descriptors achieved the highest validation receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.778. Notably, the total polar surface area (ASA_P) was among the top-ranking descriptors, and MRONJ-positive drugs such as bisphosphonates and anticancer drugs showed high values. Our final model demonstrated a balanced accuracy of 0.693 and a specificity of 0.852. Conclusions: In this study, our MRONJ-inducing drug prediction model identified drugs with polar surface area properties as potential causes of MRONJ. This study demonstrates a promising approach for predicting MRONJ risk, which could enhance drug safety assessment and streamline drug screening in clinical and preclinical settings. Full article

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) have become first-line therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK rearrangements. This study investigates ALK-TKI-associated adverse events (AEs), focusing on identifying hepatotoxicity signals and previously undocumented safety concerns. Using disproportionality analysis of 56,864 reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we systematically classified AEs via the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). At the System Organ Class (SOC) level, crizotinib exhibited a significantly stronger signal for eye disorders, ceritinib was uniquely linked to gastrointestinal disorders, and loratinib was predominantly associated with metabolism and nutrition disorders. Several AEs previously undocumented in drug labels were identified, including pericardial effusion, elevated C-reactive protein, hemolytic anemia, hemoptysis, and decreased hemoglobin. Furthermore, crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib were significantly associated with hepatotoxicity, marked by elevated alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and hepatic enzyme levels. These findings highlight the need for vigilant monitoring of unlabeled AEs and potential label updates, particularly for hepatotoxicity risks associated with crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib. Full article