Search Results (130)

Melanoma treatment comprised a few treatment choices with insufficient efficacy before the emergence of molecularly targeted medication and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which dramatically improved patient outcomes. B-Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma (BRAF) and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Kinase (MEK) inhibitors significantly improved survival in BRAF-mutant melanoma and immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) agents, established new standards of care. Challenges remain, however, including the existence of resistance mechanisms and the reduced efficacy of immune-based therapies in Asian populations, particularly for acral and mucosal subtypes. This review highlights historical and current therapeutic advancements, discusses regional considerations, and explores emerging strategies aiming at globally optimizing melanoma management. Full article

Patients with advanced melanoma who progress on standard-dose ipilimumab (Ipi) + nivolumab continue to have poor prognosis. Studies support a dose–response activity of Ipi, and one promising combination is Ipi 10 mg/kg (Ipi10) + temozolomide (TMZ). We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced melanoma treated with Ipi10 + TMZ in the immunotherapy refractory/resistant setting (n = 6, all progressed after prior Ipi + nivolumab), using similar patients treated with Ipi3 + TMZ (n = 6) as comparison. Molecular profiling by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) of tumors harvested through one responder’s treatment was performed. With a median follow up of 119 days, patients treated with Ipi10 + TMZ had a statistically significant longer median progression-free survival of 144.5 days (range 27–219) vs. 44 (26–75) in Ipi 3 mg/kg (Ipi3) + TMZ, p = 0.04, and a trend of longer median overall survival of 154.5 days (27–537) vs. 89.5 (26–548). Two patients in the Ipi10 + TMZ cohort had a partial response, and both responders had BRAF V600E mutant melanoma. RNA-seq showed enrichment of inflammatory signatures, including interferon responses in metastases after Ipi10 + TMZ compared to the primary tumor, and downregulated negative immune regulators. Ipi10 + TMZ demonstrated efficacy, including dramatic responses in patients refractory to prior Ipi + anti-PD1. Molecular data suggest a potential threshold of Ipi dose for activation of sufficient anti-tumor immune response, and higher doses are required for some patients. Full article

Melanoma is among the most abundant malignancies in the US and worldwide. Ligstroside aglycone (LA) is a rare extra-virgin olive oil-derived monophenolic secoiridoid with diverse bioactivities. LA dose–response screening at the NCI 60 cancer cells panel identified the high sensitivity of the Malme-3M cell line, which harbors a BRAF V600E mutation. Daily oral 10 mg/kg LA exhibited potent in vivo antitumor effects against Malme-3M cells xenograft in a nude mouse model by targeting the BRAF signaling pathway. A human Clariom S microarray analysis of the collected Malme- 3M tumors identified 571 dysregulated genes, with the downregulation of pathways critical for melanoma cells growth and survival. A Western blot analysis of the collected animal tumors further validated the downregulation of the mutated BRAF–MAPK axis, as well as the GPD1 and ELOVL6 expression levels. A histopathological analysis of Malme-3M tumor sections showed extensive focal tumor necrosis in treated mice. An immunofluorescence study of tumor sections showed notable reductions in proliferation marker ki67 and the vasculogenesis marker CD31 in treated tumors. These findings promote LA as a potential nutraceutical lead for the control of the BRAF V600E mutant melanoma. Full article

Background: There are no active treatment options for patients with progressive melanoma brain metastases (MBM) failing immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi). Regorafenib (REGO), an oral multi-kinase inhibitor (incl. RAF-dimer inhibition), can overcome adaptive resistance to BRAF/MEKi in preclinical models. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective case series of patients with refractory MBM treated with REGO plus BRAF/MEKi (compassionate use). Results: A total of 22 patients were identified (18 BRAF-mutant, 4 NRAS^Q61-mutant; 19 with progressive MBM; 11 on corticosteroids). Thirteen BRAF^V600-mutant patients were progressing on BRAF/MEKi at the time of REGO association. BRAF-mutant patients received REGO (40–80 mg once daily) combined with BRAF/MEKi, NRAS-mutant patients were treated with REGO + MEKi (+low-dose BRAFi to mitigate skin-toxicity). Grade 3 TRAE included arterial hypertension (n = 4) and maculopapular rash (n = 3). There were no G4/5 TRAE. In BRAF-mutant patients, overall and intracranial objective response rates (overall ORR and IC-ORR) were 11 and 29%, and overall and intracranial disease control rates (overall DCR and IC-DCR) were 44 and 59%, respectively. In NRAS-mutant patients overall ORR and IC-ORR were 0 and 25% and overall DCR and IC-DCR were 25 and 50%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were, respectively, 7.1 and 16.4 weeks in BRAF-mutant and 8.6 and 10.1 weeks in NRAS-mutant patients. Conclusions: In heavily pretreated patients with refractory MBM, REGO combined with BRAF/MEKi demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with an acceptable safety profile. In BRAF^V600-mutant melanoma patients, responses cannot solely be attributed to BRAF/MEKi rechallenge. Further investigation in a prospective trial is ongoing to increase understanding of the efficacy. Full article

The incidence of melanoma, the most lethal form of skin cancer, has increased mainly due to ultraviolet exposure. The molecular characterization of melanomas has shown a high mutational burden led to the identification of some recurrent genetic alterations. BRAF gene is mutated in 40–50% of melanomas and its role in melanoma development is paramount. BRAF mutations confer constitutive activation of MAPK signalling. The large majority (about 90%) of BRAF mutations occur at amino acid 600; the majority are BRAF^V600E mutations and less frequently BRAF^{v600K, V600D} and ^V600M. The introduction of drugs that directly target BRAF-mutant protein (BRAF inhibitors) and of agents that stimulate immune response through targeting of immune check inhibitor consistently improved the survival of melanoma BRAF^V600-mutant patients with unresectable/metastatic disease. In parallel, studies in melanoma stage II-III patients with resectable disease have shown that adjuvant therapy with ICIs and/or targeted therapy improves PFS and RFS, but not OS compared to placebo; however, neoadjuvant therapy plus adjuvant therapy improved therapeutic response compared to adjuvant therapy alone. Full article

The combinations of BRAF inhibitor-based targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors currently represent less common therapeutic approaches in advanced melanoma. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of currently available melanoma treatments by conducting a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Four databases were systematically searched for randomized clinical studies that included patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma receiving chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, or combinations thereof. The primary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), serious adverse events (SAE) of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, therapy discontinuation, progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). A total of 63 articles were eligible for our systematic review; 59 of them were included in the statistical analysis. A separate subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy outcomes, specifically in BRAF-positive patients. Triple combination therapy or triple therapy (inhibiting BRAF, MEK and PD1/PDL1 axis) showed significantly longer progression-free survival compared to BRAF + MEK combination therapies (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64–0.9), but similar objective and complete response rates in BRAF-mutated melanoma. This safety analysis suggests that triple therapy is not inferior to combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF/MEK therapies in terms of serious adverse events and therapy discontinuation rates. However, monotherapies and BRAF/MEK combinations showed notable advantage over triple therapy in terms of treatment-related adverse events. Combination strategies including BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies with ICI therapies are effective first-line options for advanced, BRAF-mutant melanoma; however, they are associated with more frequent side effects. Therefore, future RCTs are required to evaluate and identify high-risk subpopulations where triple therapy therapies should be considered. Full article

Adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) for macroscopic regional nodal cutaneous melanoma has evolved. A significant step was the discovery of targeted therapies, particularly towards V600E-mutated melanoma, and immunotherapy under its different kinds. Prior to this, the defining trial was the Australia and New Zealand Melanoma Trials Group (ANZMTG) 01.02/Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 02.01 phase III trial that showed that ART using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) decreased in-field recurrence by 50% (48 Gray (Gy) in 20 fractions). After the advent of systemic therapies, a trial of the combination targeted therapy of dabrafenib plus trametinib toward BRAF V600-mutant nodal cutaneous melanoma showed that all 35 patients achieved a pathological response. Radiotherapy (RT) was found to be safe to give with concurrent combination therapy. A retrospective immunotherapy study found that in 71 patients that received ART after a first recurrence, further in-field recurrence significantly decreased (p = 0.01). For those tumours that do recur in-field, there are now competing therapies like Talimogene laherparepvec or T-VEC. Generally, ART is now used at the first recurrence. The challenge now is to find which melanomas are truly radiosensitive if ART is to have any future role in this scenario. Full article

Melanoma is a highly aggressive type of skin cancer. Metastatic melanoma tumors have historically featured a particularly poor prognosis and have often been considered incurable. Recent advances in targeted therapeutic interventions have radically changed the landscape in metastatic melanoma management, significantly increasing the overall survival of patients. Hyperactive BRAF is the most common mutational event found in metastatic melanoma and its inhibition has proven to be a successful approach in a number of patients. Unfortunately, initial tumor retreat is followed by relapse in most cases, highlighting the elusiveness of finding a widely effective treatment. Melanoma tumors often carry a particularly high number of mutations in what is known as a high level of inter- and intra-patient tumor heterogeneity, driving resistance to treatment. The various mutations that are present in these tumors, in addition to impacting the root cause of the malignancy and the potential for therapeutic interventions, have also been known to arise during tumor clonal evolution leading to the establishment of drug resistance, a major issue in melanoma management. Full article

Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo/ipi) combination therapy is highly effective in treating advanced melanoma, but serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are prevalent. The overall response rate (ORR) of the BRAF inhibitor plus MEK inhibitor (BRAFi/MEKi) combination therapy for BRAF^V600-mutant advanced melanoma surpasses that of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the OS and PFS of BRAFi/MEKi combination therapy are inferior to those of ICIs. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 22 melanoma patients treated with nivo/ipi therapy and 13 patients treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (enco/bini) between November 2018 and July 2023. Results: The ORR of nivo/ipi for metastatic melanoma patients was significantly higher in the first-line cohort [60.0% (95% CI: 31.2–83.3%)] than in the second-line or beyond cohort [8.3% (95% CI: 0–37.5%)], whereas the ORR of enco/bini was comparable between the first-line cohort [75.0% (95% CI: 28.9–96.6%)] and the second-line or beyond cohort [77.8% (95% CI: 44.3–94.7%)]. The median PFS of nivo/ipi significantly improved in the first-line cohort [7.7 months (95% CI: 2.0–11.9)] compared to the second-line or beyond cohort [2.3 months (95% CI: 0.5–6.0)] (p = 0.0109). In addition to efficacy, the incidence of grade 3 or greater AEs was comparable in the first-line and second-line or beyond cohorts. Conclusions: Although our present data are based on a small number of cases, they suggest that nivo/ipi should be administered as the first-line therapy for the treatment of BRAF^V600-mutant metastatic melanoma, rather than enco/bini, aligning with findings from previous clinical trials. Full article

Cutaneous metastatic melanoma (CMM) is the most aggressive form of skin cancer with a poor prognosis. Drug-induced secondary tumorigenesis and the emergency of drug resistance worsen an already worrying scenario, thus rendering urgent the development of new treatments not dealing with mutable cellular processes. Triphenyl phosphonium salts (TPPSs), in addiction to acting as cytoplasmic membrane disruptors, are reported to be mitochondria-targeting compounds, exerting anticancer effects mainly by damaging their membranes and causing depolarization, impairing mitochondria functions and their DNA, triggering oxidative stress (OS), and priming primarily apoptotic cell death. TPP-based bola amphiphiles are capable of self-forming nanoparticles (NPs) with enhanced biological properties, as commonly observed for nanomaterials. Already employed in several other biomedical applications, the per se selective potent antibacterial effects of a TPP bola amphiphile have only recently been demonstrated on 50 multidrug resistant (MDR) clinical superbugs, as well as its exceptional and selective anticancer properties on sensitive and MDR neuroblastoma cells. Here, aiming at finding new molecules possibly developable as new treatments for counteracting CMM, the effects of this TPP-based bola amphiphile (BPPB) have been investigated against two BRAF mutants CMM cell lines (MeOV and MeTRAV) with excellent results (even IC₅₀ = 49 nM on MeOV after 72 h treatment). With these findings and considering the low cytotoxicity of BPPB against different mammalian non-tumoral cell lines and red blood cells (RBCs, selectivity indexes up to 299 on MeOV after 72 h treatment), the possible future development of BPPB as topical treatment for CMM lesions was presumed. With this aim, a biodegradable hyaluronic acid (HA)-based hydrogel formulation (HA-BPPB-HG) was prepared without using any potentially toxic crosslinking agents simply by dispersing suitable amounts of the two ingredients in water and sonicating under gentle heating. HA-BPPB-HA was completely characterized, with promising outcomes such as high swelling capability, high porosity, and viscous elastic rheological behavior. Full article

Over the past several decades, advancements in the treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma have led to the development of BRAF inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations, anti-PD-1 therapy, and anti-CTLA4 therapy. Although these therapies have shown substantial efficacy in clinical trials, their sustained effectiveness is often challenged by the tumor microenvironment, which is a highly heterogeneous and complex milieu of immunosuppressive cells that affect tumor progression. The era of personalized medicine holds substantial promise for the tailoring of treatments to individual genetic profiles. However, tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion mechanisms contribute to the resistance to immunotherapy. Despite these challenges, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, as exemplified by lifileucel, has demonstrated notable efficacy against BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Additionally, early response biomarkers, such as COX-2 and MMP2, along with FDG-PET imaging, offer the potential to improve personalized immunotherapy by predicting patient responses and determining the optimal treatment duration. Future efforts should focus on reducing the T-cell harvesting periods and costs associated with TIL therapy to enhance efficiency and accessibility. Full article

Purpose: This study explores the potential of pre-clinical in vitro cell line response data and computational modeling in identifying the optimal dosage requirements of pan-RAF (Belvarafenib) and MEK (Cobimetinib) inhibitors in melanoma treatment. Our research is motivated by the critical role of drug combinations in enhancing anti-cancer responses and the need to close the knowledge gap around selecting effective dosing strategies to maximize their potential. Results: In a drug combination screen of 43 melanoma cell lines, we identified specific dosage landscapes of panRAF and MEK inhibitors for NRAS vs. BRAF mutant melanomas. Both experienced benefits, but with a notably more synergistic and narrow dosage range for NRAS mutant melanoma (mean Bliss score of 0.27 in NRAS vs. 0.1 in BRAF mutants). Computational modeling and follow-up molecular experiments attributed the difference to a mechanism of adaptive resistance by negative feedback. We validated the in vivo translatability of in vitro dose–response maps by predicting tumor growth in xenografts with high accuracy in capturing cytostatic and cytotoxic responses. We analyzed the pharmacokinetic and tumor growth data from Phase 1 clinical trials of Belvarafenib with Cobimetinib to show that the synergy requirement imposes stricter precision dose constraints in NRAS mutant melanoma patients. Conclusion: Leveraging pre-clinical data and computational modeling, our approach proposes dosage strategies that can optimize synergy in drug combinations, while also bringing forth the real-world challenges of staying within a precise dose range. Overall, this work presents a framework to aid dose selection in drug combinations. Full article

Drug tolerance is a major cause of relapse after cancer treatment. Despite intensive efforts, its molecular basis remains poorly understood, hampering actionable intervention. We report a previously unrecognized signaling mechanism supporting drug tolerance in BRAF-mutant melanoma treated with BRAF inhibitors that could be of general relevance to other cancers. Its key features are cell-intrinsic intracellular Ca²⁺ signaling initiated by P2X7 receptors (purinergic ligand-gated cation channels) and an enhanced ability for these Ca²⁺ signals to reactivate ERK1/2 in the drug-tolerant state. Extracellular ATP, virtually ubiquitous in living systems, is the ligand that can initiate Ca²⁺ spikes via P2X7 channels. ATP is abundant in the tumor microenvironment and is released by dying cells, ironically implicating treatment-initiated cancer cell death as a source of trophic stimuli that leads to ERK reactivation and drug tolerance. Such a mechanism immediately offers an explanation of the inevitable relapse after BRAFi treatment in BRAF-mutant melanoma and points to actionable strategies to overcome it. Full article

This review discusses the topic of prevention of brain metastases from the most frequent solid tumor types, i.e., lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma. Within each tumor type, the risk of brain metastasis is related to disease status and molecular subtype (i.e., EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, BRAF and NRAF-mutant melanoma). Prophylactic cranial irradiation is the standard of care in patients in small cell lung cancer responsive to chemotherapy but at the price of late neurocognitive decline. More recently, several molecular agents with the capability to target molecular alterations driving tumor growth have proven as effective in the prevention of secondary relapse into the brain in clinical trials. This is the case for EGFR-mutant or ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer inhibitors, tucatinib and trastuzumab–deruxtecan for HER2-positive breast cancer and BRAF inhibitors for melanoma. The need for screening with an MRI in asymptomatic patients at risk of brain metastases is emphasized. Full article

Lung cancer, despite recent advancements in survival rates, represents a significant global health burden. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most prevalent type, is driven largely by activating mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), and less in v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein-kinase kinase (MEK), all key components of the RTK-RAS-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Learning from melanoma, the identification of BRAFV600E substitution in NSCLC provided the rationale for the investigation of RAF and MEK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy. The regulatory approval of two RAF-MEK inhibitor combinations, dabrafenib–trametinib, in 2017, and encorafenib–binimetinib, in 2023, signifies a breakthrough for the management of BRAFV600E-mutant NSCLC patients. However, the almost universal emergence of acquired resistance limits their clinical benefit. New RAF and MEK inhibitors, with distinct biochemical characteristics, are in preclinical and clinical development. In this review, we aim to provide valuable insights into the current state of RAF and MEK inhibition in the management of NSCLC, fostering a deeper understanding of the potential impact on patient outcomes. Full article