Search Results (114)

Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare lung malignancy characterized by an aggressive clinical course and an unfavorable prognosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revealed that LCNECs exhibit molecular features resembling either small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC-like LCNEC) or non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC-like LCNEC). This study aimed to characterize the incidence of actionable gene variants in a retrospective cohort of LCNEC patients using a targeted NGS approach. Microscopic diagnosis was established according to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification using a standard immunohistochemical (IHC) panel. In total, 216 LCNEC tumor samples were analyzed for molecular variants in 17 genes using the RNA-based Archer FusionPlex Lung NGS assay (Integrated DNA Technologies, USA) and the MiSeq platform (Illumina, USA)—an algorithm utilized for routine NSCLC diagnosis. Overall, 46 variants were identified in 46/216 (21.3%) tumor samples, with 28/216 (13%) LCNECs harboring at least one actionable molecular variant potentially targetable by registered or investigational agents. KRAS variants (5%; including G12C at 2%) and PIK3CA variants (5%) were the most prevalent, followed by RET single-nucleotide variants (3%), uncommon EGFR variants (1%), and BRAF class II and III variants (<1%). Notably, no classical EGFR exon 18–21 mutations nor ALK, FGFR1/2/3, or ROS1 alterations (mutations or fusions) were detected, despite the technical capability of the assay to identify such variants. A novel in-frame gene fusion (TMEM79::NTRK1) was identified in a single tumor sample (0.5%). Our results confirm that LCNECs harbor potentially targetable alterations in KRAS, PIK3CA, RET, BRAF, and NTRK1, albeit at lower frequencies than those typically observed in NSCLC. Full article

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has impacted the treatment landscape for mCRC, leading to improved outcomes through the use of molecularly targeted and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommend, at a minimum, initial testing to assess RAS, BRAF, HER2, and microsatellite instability (MSI)/mismatch repair (MMR) status, as these results determine therapeutic eligibility. Broader testing to identify the eligibility for tumor-agnostic therapy for a tumor mutation burden (TMB), NTRK gene fusions, and RET fusions is encouraged for all patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients with metastatic disease may develop progressive disease, often as a result of adaptive resistance mechanisms and selective therapeutic pressure on disease heterogeneity. Repeat biomarker testing at progression has the potential to define these resistance mechanisms and to guide the next therapy or clinical trial enrollment. While these practices have become more commonplace, unified guidelines have yet to be established. In this review of the literature, we evaluate the advantages and pitfalls of sequential biomarker testing during disease progression in patients with mCRC. Full article

Background: The development of advanced genomic sequencing techniques now makes it possible to identify novel biomarkers and guide the design of targeted therapeutic strategies. For advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) fusions have not been evaluated as a therapeutic target. However, agents that block the pathway activated by these fusions have shown efficacy in other solid tumors, such as melanoma, astrocytoma, acinar carcinoma of the pancreas, and papillary thyroid tumors. Case Report: Here, we present the case of a patient with locally advanced squamous NSCLC and minimal smoking history who was found to harbor a TMEM178B::BRAF fusion. Following curative-intent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and subsequent maintenance immunotherapy, the patient achieved a complete radiological response at 12 months, accompanied by a marked improvement in both quality of life and overall clinical status. Conclusions: The findings in this patient underscore the importance of extending molecular genetic studies to patients with squamous histology who lack toxic habits or known risk factors. Gene alterations such as BRAF rearrangements may not only predict the response to immunotherapy-based treatments but also represent a promising avenue for the development of new therapeutic strategies. Full article

From an epidemiological perspective, polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor (PLNTY) represents a small proportion of brain tumors encountered in epilepsy surgery series. Their rarity and relatively recent recognition likely contribute to underdiagnosis and poor prognosis. In terms of histopathological features, they are similar to oligodendrogliomas. Molecular analyses can be used to show the fusion between fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR3) and transforming acidic coiled coil (TACC) proteins, which most commonly results in progression towards glioblastoma (GBM). We report a case of a 62-year-old man who underwent left frontal craniotomy to remove a frontal mass. Histologically, the glial lesion consisted of elements associated with oligodendroglia-like features. Immunohistochemistry was positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (OLIG2), and α-thalassemia X-linked mental retardation syndrome (ATRX) nuclear expression, but negative for isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and BRAF-V600E. Next-generation sequencing showed the FGFR-TACC3 fusion, and taken together, these findings supported the final diagnosis of PLNTY. During follow-up, the patient underwent a second neurosurgery, where histological evaluation indicated a GMB. This article presents clinical and radiological data, morphology, immunohistochemistry, molecular features, and treatment to enhance the clinical and pathological understanding of PLNTY with FGFR3-TACC3 fusion for all professionals involved in medical decisions. Full article

Background/Objectives: Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) is a rare central nervous system neoplasm characterized by leptomeningeal dissemination and heterogeneous clinical and molecular features. Owing to its rarity, the prognostic relevance of clinical, radiological, and molecular factors remains poorly defined. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively summarize the clinicopathological characteristics, molecular landscape, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes of patients with DLGNT. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify published cases of DLGNT. Studies reporting individual patient data were included. Clinical, molecular, treatment, and survival data were pooled. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, with subgroup analyses according to clinical and molecular variables. Results: Seventy-five patients were included. Most patients were pediatric, and spinal leptomeningeal dissemination and hydrocephalus were frequent. BRAF alterations, most commonly KIAA1549::BRAF fusion, were frequently identified, although no molecular marker predicted survival. The median OS was 89 months, and the median PFS was 30 months. Surgical resection was associated with significantly longer OS compared with biopsy only, while a trend toward longer PFS was observed. Survival outcomes did not differ significantly according to age group, BRAF status, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Conclusions: DLGNT is a rare and heterogeneous tumor with variable presentation and prolonged survival in selected patients. Although surgical resection may be associated with improved survival, interpretation is limited by selection bias. No single molecular alteration reliably predicts prognosis, highlighting the need for prospective multicenter studies with standardized molecular profiling. Full article

Background/Objectives: Tissue-agnostic therapy has transformed oncology by enabling treatment selection based on molecular alterations rather than tumor origin. Since 2017, nine U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals across six biomarker classes have defined this paradigm. Thoracic and head and neck (H&N) cancers have been underrepresented in the registrational evidence supporting these approvals. This review systematically evaluated biomarker representation, histologic distribution, and clinical applicability of tissue-agnostic therapies in thoracic and H&N malignancies. Methods: A narrative systematic review was conducted using PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and regulatory documents for all tissue-agnostic approvals between January 2017 and October 2025. Data were extracted from pivotal trials, including total enrollment, objective response rate (ORR), histologic distribution, and thoracic/H&N representation. Emerging biomarkers and resistance mechanisms were assessed from phase I–III studies and basket trials. Results: Nine tissue-agnostic approvals encompassing six biomarkers were identified: MSI-H/dMMR, TMB-High, NTRK, RET, BRAF V600E, and HER2 (IHC 3+). Across pivotal datasets (3800 patients), thoracic and H&N cancers accounted for fewer than 8% (n = 290) of enrolled patients. Thoracic representation was dominated by non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in RET, NTRK, and HER2 programs (150 patients, 4%), while small-cell lung, mesothelioma, and thymic carcinomas contributed <1% combined. H&N cancers comprised 140 patients (3–4%), primarily secretory salivary carcinoma in NTRK trials (n = 12–20), thyroid carcinoma in BRAF (n = 36) and RET (n = 45) programs, and rare HER2-positive salivary duct carcinomas. Conventional HNSCC and sinonasal cancers were limited to 1–2 cases per trial. Only two of nine trials (22%) reported prespecified CNS endpoints, and RNA-based fusion testing was employed in <40%, underscoring diagnostic variability and limited applicability. Conclusions: Although tissue-agnostic therapy has expanded the reach of precision oncology, thoracic and H&N cancers remain underrepresented in registrational evidence. Most approvals rely on single-arm basket studies with small, heterogeneous subsets that preclude histology-specific conclusions. Future research should prioritize histology-enriched trial designs, standardized molecular diagnostics, and real-world validation to establish reliable, equitable standards of care for these underrepresented malignancies. Full article

Background: Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumors (DLGNT) are rare pediatric central nervous system tumors, first recognized in the 2016 WHO classification. Their clinical course is highly heterogeneous, and no international consensus treatment guidelines are currently available. This study aims to describe clinical characteristics, disease evolution, and management strategies for pediatric DLGNT patients, with a focus on aggressive forms. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, international study (Belgium and France) included pediatric patients diagnosed with DLGNT between 1 February 2016 and 31 December 2024. Clinical, radiological, histopathological, molecular, and therapeutic data were collected. Findings were analyzed and contextualized through an extensive literature review. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled (median age: 8.2 years; median follow-up: 52 months). The median delay between the first MRI and definitive diagnosis was 6.5 months. Symptoms of intracranially elevated pressure were present in 55% of patients. Two-thirds of the patients presented with leptomeningeal dissemination at diagnosis. The primary tumor site could not be identified in two patients. A KIAA1549::BRAF transcript fusion was detected in 82% of cases, and chromosome 1q gain in 38%. All patients underwent surgery at diagnosis. The median number of therapeutic lines was four: 82% received chemotherapy (weekly vinblastine in 55%, vincristine/carboplatin regimen in 45%), 64% received MAPK pathway-targeted therapy, and 18% underwent radiotherapy. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 68.5%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months after first-line therapy and 16.5 months after the second line. At the end of follow-up, only one patient achieved complete remission, and 78% of survivors presented with persistent neurological deficits. Conclusions: This study underscores the significant diagnostic delay, clinical heterogeneity, and absence of standardized therapeutic approaches in pediatric DLGNT patients. Conventional low-grade glioma chemotherapy constitutes the current treatment backbone, while MAPK pathway-targeted therapies show promising potential. Further studies and the establishment of an international registry are crucial to better characterize aggressive subtypes and optimize management strategies. Full article

Ampullary carcinoma (AC) is a rare gastrointestinal malignancy with dual intestinal and pancreatobiliary differentiation, complicating diagnosis, staging, and treatment. This review synthesizes current epidemiology, pathology, and multi-omic data to outline a pragmatic care pathway: lineage-first at presentation, mutation-fast at progression. Histology remains the primary classifier: the intestinal subtype generally aligns with colorectal regimens, whereas pancreatobiliary and mixed subtypes favor pancreaticobiliary therapy. In selected fit patients, modified FOLFIRINOX may address mixed phenotypes. Next-generation sequencing adds precision by identifying therapeutically relevant alterations, including ERBB2/HER2 amplifications, MSI-high/dMMR, BRAF V600E, and rare NTRK or RET fusions, while KRAS mutations are enriched in pancreatobiliary tumors. We recommend early application of a rapid-core panel (KRAS/BRAF, MSI/dMMR, ERBB2/HER2, RNA-based fusions) to capture high-impact targets, followed by comprehensive profiling at first progression. Liquid biopsy, plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), or bile-derived DNA may complement tissue and help identify the dominant lineage. Research priorities include ampulla-enriched umbrella trials, explicit AC subcohorts in tissue-agnostic studies, and ctDNA-informed endpoints. This lineage-first, mutation-fast paradigm supports precision care and evidence generation in AC. Full article

Thalamic gliomas are among the most challenging pediatric brain tumors due to the delicate functions of the thalamus. Limited surgical intervention leads to the use of adjuvant therapies, including targeted therapy. Thalamic gliomas can be divided into two distinct groups: diffuse midline glioma (DMG) and low-grade glioma (LGG). The most common mutations that can be targeted for treatment are the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion; BRAF V600E mutation; EGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, NTRK, and CDK4/6 mutations; other MAP kinase pathway alterations; and PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation. The bithalamic high-grade glioma especially demonstrates EGFR mutations which makes it a distinct entity. Targeted therapy, including tyrosine kinas inhibitors has been shown to improve the overall survival compared to conventional therapy in certain situations. Demonstrating the mutation carried by the tumor is very critical in this regard. The purpose of this article is to focus on the treatment of thalamic glioma in pediatric patients in light of molecular information. Full article

Background: Advances in molecular pathology have transformed NSCLC (Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer) diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment by enabling precise tumor characterization and targeted therapeutic strategies. We review key genomic alterations in NSCLC, including EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutations, ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1 (ROS proto-oncogene 1) rearrangements, BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase) mutations, MET (mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor) alterations, KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma) mutations, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) alterations and emerging NTRK (neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase) fusions and AXL-related pathways. Methods: A total of 48 patients with NSCLC was analyzed, including 22 women and 26 men (mean age 70 years, range 44–86). Tumor specimens were classified histologically as adenocarcinomas (n = 81%) or squamous cell carcinomas (n = 19%). Smoking history, PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) expression, and genetic alterations were assessed. NGS (Next-generation sequencing) identified genomic variants, which were classified according to ACMG (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics) guidelines. Results: The cohort consisted of 29 former smokers, 13 current smokers, and 5 non-smokers (12%), with a mean smoking burden of 33 pack years. PD-L1 TPS (tumor proportion score) was ≥50% in 10 patients, ≥1–<50% in 22, and <1% in 15 patients. In total, 120 genomic variants were detected (allele frequency ≥ 5%). Of these, 52 (43%) were classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic, 48 (40%) as variants of unknown significance, and 20 (17%) as benign or likely benign. The most frequently altered genes were TP53 (tumor protein p53) (31%), KRAS and EGFR (15% each), and STK11 (serine/threonine kinase 11) (12%). Adenocarcinomas accounted for 89% of all alterations, with TP53 (21%) and KRAS (15%) being most common, while squamous cell carcinomas predominantly harbored TP53 (38%) and MET (15%) mutations. In patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, KRAS mutations were enriched (50%), particularly KRAS G12C and G12D, with frequent co-occurrence of TP53 mutations (20%). No pathogenic EGFR mutations were detected in this subgroup. Conclusions: Comprehensive genomic profiling in NSCLC revealed a high prevalence of clinically relevant mutations, with TP53, KRAS and EGFR as the dominant drivers. The strong association of KRAS mutations with high PD-L1 expression, irrespective of smoking history, highlights the interplay between genetic and immunological pathways in NSCLC. These findings support the routine implementation of broad molecular testing to guide precision oncology approaches in both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients. Full article

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors consist of a diverse set of malignancies that remain clinically challenging due to their biological complexity, high morbidity, and limited responsiveness to current therapies. A growing body of genomic evidence has revealed that dysregulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway is a recurrent and unifying characteristic across many pediatric and adult CNS tumor entities. Alterations affecting upstream receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), RAS GTPases, RAF kinases, and other associated regulators contribute to MAPK signaling pathway hyperactivation, shaping tumor behavior, therapy response and resistance. These aberrations ranging from hotspot mutations such as BRAF V600E and oncogenic fusions like BRAF–KIAA1549 are particularly enriched in gliomas and glioneuronal tumors, highlighting MAPK signaling as a key oncogenic driver. The expanding availability of molecularly targeted compounds, including selective inhibitors of RAF, MEK and ERK, has begun to transform treatment approaches for specific molecular subtypes. However, the clinical benefit of MAPK-directed therapies is frequently limited by restricted blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration, intratumoral heterogeneity, parallel pathway reactivation, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). In this review, we synthesize current knowledge on MAPK pathway alterations in CNS tumors and evaluate the therapeutic landscape of MAPK inhibition, with emphasis on approved agents, emerging compounds, combination strategies, and novel drug-delivery technologies. We also discuss mechanisms that undermine treatment efficacy and highlight future directions aimed at integrating MAPK-targeted therapy into precision-based management of brain tumors. Full article

Over the past several decades, rapid advances in molecular genomics have transformed our understanding of thyroid malignancies and are increasingly integrated into international clinical guidelines. Mutational profiles and epigenetic events are now recognized not only as diagnostic and prognostic tools but also as predictors of therapeutic response. Papillary, follicular, oncocytic, medullary, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas harbor distinct early driver mutations, such as BRAFV600E, RAS, and fusion events (RET, NTRK, and ALK), that cooperate with secondary alterations (TERT promoter, TP53, PIK3CA, and CDKN2A/B loss) to drive dedifferentiation, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. Insights from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and transcriptomic scoring systems (e.g., BRAF–RAS score) now link genotype to tumor morphology, metastatic tropism, and radioactive iodine refractoriness. These molecular insights have been incorporated into updated risk stratification frameworks, preoperative surgical planning, and treatment algorithms, informing the selection of kinase inhibitors, redifferentiation strategies, and enrollment in genotype-directed clinical trials for radioiodine-refractory disease. This review synthesizes recent evidence connecting genomic alterations to clinical behavior and highlights their translation into evolving approaches for thyroid cancer management. Full article

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with a five-year survival rate of 3–15% and limited effective treatment options for most patients. Approximately 5–10% of cases are wild-type KRAS and are more likely to harbor rare alterations, including gene fusions involving anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS Proto-Oncogene 1 (ROS1), neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK), Rearranged During Transfection (RET), Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR), or Neuregulin 1 (NRG1) genes, as well as germline mutations in DNA repair genes. This review integrates current evidence on the prevalence, molecular profile, and clinical significance of gene fusions, amplification, and somatic/germline mutations in PDAC, with a particular focus on the wild-type KRAS subgroup. Clinical trial data and case reports indicate that these alterations can enhance patient susceptibility to targeted therapies. Currently, selpercatinib, larotrectinib, and repotrectinib are approved by the FDA for the treatment of certain solid tumors harboring specific gene fusions. Recent studies on zenocutuzumab resulted in the FDA-accelerated approval for NGR1 fusion-positive NSCLC and PDAC. Germline mutations may specifically increase responsiveness to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or platinum-based treatments. Comprehensive genomic profiling, incorporating fusion detection and germline testing, is essential to identify patients who may benefit from precision-based approaches. Full article

Despite technological progress, glioblastoma (GBM) continues to confer dismal prognoses. Modern neuroimaging methods are assuming an ever greater role in diagnosing and monitoring brain tumors. This review shows current neuroimaging approaches and systemic therapeutic strategies for glioblastoma, with a focus on emerging and innovative treatments. Advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging—MRI (diffusion, perfusion, and spectroscopy) and novel positron emission tomography (PET) tracers, complemented by radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI), now refine tumor delineation, differentiate progression from treatment effects, and may help predict treatment responses. Maximal safe resection followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide remains the standard, with the greatest benefit seen in O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter-methylated tumors. Bevacizumab and other targeted modalities offer mainly progression-free, not overall survival, gains. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., nivolumab) have not improved survival in unselected GBM, while early multi-antigen CAR-T (chimeric antigen receptor T-cell) strategies show preliminary bioactivity without established durability. While actionable alterations (NTRK fusions and BRAF V600E) justify selective targeted therapy trials, their definitive benefit in classical GBM is unproven. Future priorities include harmonized imaging molecular integration, AI-driven prognostic modeling, novel PET tracers, and strategies to breach or transiently open the blood–brain barrier to enhance drug delivery. Convergence of these domains may convert diagnostic precision into improved patient outcomes. Full article

Precision oncology is witnessing an increasing number of molecular targets fueled by the continuous improvement of cancer genomics and drug development. Tumor genomic profiling is nowadays (August 2025) part of routine cancer patient care, guiding therapeutic decisions day by day. Nevertheless, implementing and distilling the increasing number of potential gene targets and possible precision drugs into therapeutically relevant actions is a challenge. The availability of prescreening programs for clinical trials has expanded the description of the genomic landscape of gastrointestinal tumors. The selection of the genomic test to use in each clinical situation, the correct interpretation of the results, and ensuring clinically meaningful implications in the context of diverse geographical drug accessibility, economic cost, and access to clinical trials are daily challenges of personalized medicine. In this context, well-established negative predictive biomarkers, such as extended RAS extended mutations for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer, and positive predictive biomarkers, such as MSI status, BRAF p.V600E hotspot mutation, ERBB2 amplification, or even NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, RET, and NRG1 fusions across gastrointestinal cancers, are mandatory to provide tailored clinical care, improve patient selection for treatment and clinical trials, maximize therapeutic benefit, and minimize unnecessary toxicity. In this review, we provide an updated overview of actionable genomic alterations in GI cancers and discuss their implications for clinical decision making. Full article