Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (271)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Adalimumab

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 682 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Outcomes of First-Line Anti-TNF Therapy for Chronic Inflammatory Pouch Conditions: A Multi-Centre Multi-National Study
by Itai Ghersin, Maya Fischman, Giacomo Calini, Eduard Koifman, Valerio Celentano, Jonathan P. Segal, Orestis Argyriou, Simon D. McLaughlin, Heather Johnson, Matteo Rottoli, Kapil Sahnan, Janindra Warusavitarne and Ailsa L. Hart
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1870; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081870 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 109
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) medications were historically commonly prescribed as the first-line biologic treatment for chronic inflammatory pouch conditions. However, their use in these conditions is mainly based on retrospective studies of relatively small numbers of patients with short follow up periods. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) medications were historically commonly prescribed as the first-line biologic treatment for chronic inflammatory pouch conditions. However, their use in these conditions is mainly based on retrospective studies of relatively small numbers of patients with short follow up periods. We aimed to describe the long-term outcomes of first-line anti-TNF therapy in a large, multi-centre, multi-national patient cohort with chronic inflammatory pouch conditions. Methods: This was an observational, retrospective, multi-centre, multi-national study. We included patients with chronic inflammatory pouch conditions initially treated with anti-TNF drugs infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA), who had a follow up of at least 1 year. The primary outcome was anti-TNF treatment persistence, defined as continuation of anti-TNF throughout the study period. The secondary outcome was pouch failure, defined by the need for a defunctioning ileostomy or pouch excision. Results: We recruited 98 patients with chronic inflammatory pouch conditions initially treated with anti-TNF medications—63 (64.3%) treated with IFX and 35 (35.7%) treated with ADA. Average follow up length was 94.2 months (±54.5). At the end of the study period only 22/98 (22.4%) patients were still on anti-TNF treatment. In those in whom the first-line anti-TNF was discontinued, the median time to discontinuation was 12.2 months (range 5.1–26.9 months). The most common cause for anti-TNF discontinuation was lack of efficacy despite adequate serum drug levels and absence of anti-drug antibody formation (30 patients, 30.6%). Loss of response due to anti-drug antibody formation was the cause for discontinuation in 18 patients (18.4%), while 12 patients (12.2%) stopped treatment because of adverse events or safety concerns. Out of the 76 patients discontinuing anti-TNF treatment, 34 (34.7% of the cohort) developed pouch failure, and 42 (42.8% of the cohort) are currently treated with a different medical therapy. Conclusions: First-line anti-TNF therapy for chronic pouch inflammatory conditions is associated with low long-term persistence rates. This is due to a combination of lack of efficacy and adverse events. A significant percentage of patients initially treated with anti-TNF therapy develop pouch failure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 604 KiB  
Review
Interplay of Gut Microbiota, Biologic Agents, and Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Narrative Review
by Alexandra-Eleftheria Menni, Evdoxia Kyriazopoulou, Eleni Karakike, Georgios Tzikos, Eirini Filidou and Katerina Kotzampassi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7066; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157066 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 203
Abstract
Disruption of the microbiota resulting in pathogenicity is known as dysbiosis and is key in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. The microbiome of patients with IBD is characterized by depletion of commensal bacteria, in particular Bacteroidetes and the Lachnospiraceae subgroup of [...] Read more.
Disruption of the microbiota resulting in pathogenicity is known as dysbiosis and is key in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. The microbiome of patients with IBD is characterized by depletion of commensal bacteria, in particular Bacteroidetes and the Lachnospiraceae subgroup of Firmicutes, and by the concomitant increase in Proteobacteria and the Bacillus subgroup of Firmicutes. These changes reflect a decrease in microbial diversity with a concomitant decrease in health-promoting bacteria like Faecalibacterium and Roseburia. Treatment with biologic agents has changed the natural course of disease, improving patient outcomes. Changes in gut microbiota occur under treatment with biologic agents and act towards reversal of dysbiosis. These changes are more striking in patients achieving remission and specific gut microbiota signatures may be predictive of treatment response and a step towards precision medicine, since, despite advances in medical treatment, some patients are at risk of surgery and subsequent complications such as anastomotic leakage. This review summarizes current available evidence on the interplay of gut microbiota and biologic agents, surgery, and surgical complications in patients with IBD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Microbiome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 361 KiB  
Review
Design of an Array to Evaluate Biomarkers of Response to Biological Treatments in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
by Andrea Rodríguez-Lopez, Eva González-Iglesias, Jesús Novalbos, Susana Almenara and Francisco Abad-Santos
Future Pharmacol. 2025, 5(3), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/futurepharmacol5030039 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 348
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is defined as recurrent inflammatory bowel disorders, the most common of which are Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNFs), primarily adalimumab (ADA), infliximab (IFX), ustekinumab (UST), and vedolizumab (VLZ), are used to [...] Read more.
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is defined as recurrent inflammatory bowel disorders, the most common of which are Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNFs), primarily adalimumab (ADA), infliximab (IFX), ustekinumab (UST), and vedolizumab (VLZ), are used to treat moderate-to-severe cases of IBD in patients who either do not tolerate or fail to respond to conventional therapies. However, about one-third of patients are primary non-responders to these treatments, and an additional 30% lose response over time. Several studies have investigated the role of genetic variability in explaining these differences in treatment response among patients. The aim of this study was to design an array of 60 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) to validate the biomarkers described in the literature in a population of more than 400 IBD patients treated with biological drugs. Method: The primary focus of this study was the most recent reviews published in PubMed, with all relevant SNVs selected for the array design. Subsequently, studies presenting original data on the association between variants and the response to biological treatment were identified. Results: A total of 55.9% of SNVs have been studied in CD, 18.6% have been in UC, and 25.4% have been studied in both pathologies. A total of 44.1% of SNVs have been observed to influence the response to IFX, 16.9% influence the response to ADA, and 37.3% influence the response to both IFX and ADA; however, only one study (1.7%) reported an influence on the response to UST and none reported an influence on the response to VLZ. Conclusions: An array comprising 38 genes and 59 SNVs has been designed to be used to validate biomarkers associated with responses to biologic drug treatments in IBD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 569 KiB  
Article
Impact of Biologics and Proton Pump Inhibitors on Gastrointestinal Infection Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Pathogen-Specific Outcomes and Treatment Interactions
by Ryan Njeim, Elie Moussa, Chapman Wei, Joelle Sleiman, Reem Dimachkie and Liliane Deeb
Biomedicines 2025, 13(7), 1676; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071676 - 8 Jul 2025
Viewed by 405
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients face elevated gastrointestinal (GI) infection risks due to immune dysregulation and gut dysbiosis. While steroids and immunosuppressants are known to increase infection risk, data on biologics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain limited, particularly for non-Clostridioides [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients face elevated gastrointestinal (GI) infection risks due to immune dysregulation and gut dysbiosis. While steroids and immunosuppressants are known to increase infection risk, data on biologics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain limited, particularly for non-Clostridioides difficile (C.diff) infections. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 9849 hospitalized IBD patients (2013–2023) from the Northwell Inpatient Database. Patients were categorized into four groups: biologics-only, PPIs-only, both, or neither. GI infections were identified via C.diff PCR, GI PCR, and chart review. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for demographics, BMI, and IBD type. Results: GI infections occurred in 1.75% of patients, with significantly higher odds in those on biologics alone (OR 21.5, 95% CI 11.7–39.4) or with PPIs (OR 16.6, 95% CI 10.2–26.8) versus untreated patients. Non-C.diff infections were strongly associated with biologics (OR 20.7, 95% CI 10.2–41.9). PPIs alone increased slightly the risk of GI infections (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.4). Vedolizumab and adalimumab had the highest infection risks among biologics (26.8% and 22.7%, respectively). Bacterial pathogens, such as E. coli and Salmonella, predominated, with no significant difference in causative agents across treatment groups. Conclusions: Biologic therapy greatly increases GI infection risk in IBD patients independent of PPI use. Clinicians should weigh infection risks when prescribing biologics, particularly in high-risk populations. Further studies are needed to assess risks by biologic subtype and the interplay with PPIs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 251 KiB  
Article
Risk of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Reactivation in Patients Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists: A Five-Year Retrospective Study
by Işıl Deniz Alıravcı, Pınar Mutlu, Sibel Oymak, Ufuk Ilter Guney and Oguzhan Keskin
Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2025, 10(7), 190; https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10070190 - 7 Jul 2025
Viewed by 622
Abstract
Background: This study aims to reveal the demographic and clinical data of patients receiving TNF-α blockers, to compare the characteristics of those who received latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment and those who did not, and to evaluate and determine potential risk factors for [...] Read more.
Background: This study aims to reveal the demographic and clinical data of patients receiving TNF-α blockers, to compare the characteristics of those who received latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment and those who did not, and to evaluate and determine potential risk factors for developing active TB disease. Methods: A systematic retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary university hospital examining all patients receiving at least one TNF-α blocker between January 2019 and October 2024. The incidence of tuberculosis (TB) was analyzed across various TNF-α blocker medications in patients, both with and without LTBI treatment. Results: A total of 519 patients had TNF-α blockers: 452 (87.09%) underwent TST, 193 (37.1%) underwent booster TST, and 33 (6.3%) underwent IGRA/TST; 362 (69.7%) were treated for LTBI, and 7 (1.3%) developed TB. Comparing all TNF-α blockers, adalimumab showed a higher risk of TB. Patients with and without LTBI treatment did not significantly differ in TB incidence after biologic therapy. Conclusions: The incidence of TB in people taking TNF-α blockers was higher compared to the incidence in the general population. LTBI screening, including both TST and IGRA, should be performed with TST and IGRA tests, and LTBI-positive individuals should be started on preventive treatment. However, it should not be forgotten that active TB disease may also develop in LTBI-negative individuals. Full article
12 pages, 1245 KiB  
Article
Systemic Biologic Treatment for Psoriasis in Elderly Patients
by Sapir Glazer Levavi, Ronny Maman, Shany Sherman, Daniel Mimouni and Lev Pavlovsky
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4779; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134779 - 7 Jul 2025
Viewed by 487
Abstract
Approximately 3–13% of patients with psoriasis are first affected after age 60 years. Numerous studies have investigated the use of biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis, but the routine exclusion of elderly adults from clinical trials has limited our knowledge about their [...] Read more.
Approximately 3–13% of patients with psoriasis are first affected after age 60 years. Numerous studies have investigated the use of biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis, but the routine exclusion of elderly adults from clinical trials has limited our knowledge about their effects in this age group. Background/Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs for the treatment of psoriasis in elderly patients. Methods: A single-center-based retrospective cohort study design was used. A total of 149 elderly patients with psoriasis were divided into two groups by age at initiation of biologic treatment: <65 years (adult-start group) and >65 years (elderly-start group). Data on patient characteristics were collected and analyzed, and drug survival was evaluated. Results: Demographics, comorbidities, and treatment turnover were similar in the adult-start and elderly-start groups. Drug survival of adalimumab as first-line treatment, and of guselkumab in any treatment sequence, was significantly better in the elderly-start group (p = 0.029 and p = 0.032, respectively). There was no between-group difference in drug safety, as reflected in hospitalizations for infection or death. Conclusions: Biologic treatments for psoriasis demonstrate both efficacy and safety in elderly patients. Some agents exhibited better drug survival when initiated after age 65 years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management and Treatment of Psoriasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2524 KiB  
Article
Disparate Roles of Cell–Cell Contact and Cytokine Secretion in an In Vitro Model of the Seminoma Microenvironment
by Patrick Fruth, Juliane Luft, Lucas Klaus, Tobias J. Legler, Holger M. Reichardt and Fabian A. Gayer
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6173; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136173 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 371
Abstract
Type II testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are the most common solid malignancies in young men and are classified into seminomas and non-seminomatous subtypes. Seminomas are known for their highly pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME) with abundant immune cell infiltration. While previous work has [...] Read more.
Type II testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are the most common solid malignancies in young men and are classified into seminomas and non-seminomatous subtypes. Seminomas are known for their highly pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment (TME) with abundant immune cell infiltration. While previous work has demonstrated that the seminoma-derived cell line TCam-2 induces immune cell activation in co-culture and undergoes phenotypic changes itself, the underlying mechanisms remained unclear. To explore the role of direct cell–cell interaction and the effects mediated by soluble mediators such as cytokines, we conducted co-culture experiments of TCam-2 cells with purified human T cells or monocytes, including Transwell assays and treatments with IL-6, TNFα, or their respective blocking antibodies Tocilizumab and Adalimumab. In this way, we found that immune cell activation, indicated by enhanced secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and an upregulation of activation markers, strongly depended on direct physical contact between both cell types. Nonetheless, we also unveiled the role of soluble mediators in both immune cell activation and promoting a shift in TCam-2 cells from a seminoma-like phenotype to a more dedifferentiated phenotype, suggesting that cytokines critically shape the TME. These observations highlight the complexity of tumor–immune interactions in the seminoma microenvironment, offering new insight into immune-driven dynamics in TGCTs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Cancer Biology and Therapeutics: Third Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1544 KiB  
Brief Report
Impact of Light-Chain Variants on the Expression of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies in HEK293 and CHO Cells
by Alexander Veber, Dennis Lenau, Polyniki Gkragkopoulou, David Kornblüh Bauer, Ingo Focken, Wulf Dirk Leuschner, Christian Beil, Sandra Weil, Ercole Rao and Thomas Langer
Antibodies 2025, 14(3), 53; https://doi.org/10.3390/antib14030053 - 24 Jun 2025
Viewed by 484
Abstract
Recombinantly produced monoclonal antibodies (mabs) belong to the fastest growing class of biotherapeutics. In humans, antibodies are classified into five different classes: IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG and IgM. Most of the therapeutic mabs used in the clinic belong to the IgG class, albeit [...] Read more.
Recombinantly produced monoclonal antibodies (mabs) belong to the fastest growing class of biotherapeutics. In humans, antibodies are classified into five different classes: IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG and IgM. Most of the therapeutic mabs used in the clinic belong to the IgG class, albeit other antibody classes, e.g., IgM, have been evaluated in clinical stages. Antibodies are composed of heavy chains paired with a light chain. In IgM and IgA, an additional chain, the J-chain, is present. Two types of light chains exist in humans: the κ-light chain and the λ-light chain. The κ-light chain predominates in humans and is used in the vast majority of therapeutic IgG. The reason for the preference of the κ-light chain in humans is not known. Our study investigates whether light-chain selection influences the productivity of the clinically validated mabs adalimumab and trastuzumab. Both mabs were expressed as IgG and IgM with a κ- or a λ-light chain in HEK293 cells. Besides comparing the expression levels of the different mabs, we also evaluated whether the passage number of the cell line has an impact on product yield. In addition, the expressions of adalimumab, trastuzumab, an anti-CD38 and an anti-PD-L1-antibody were analyzed in HEK293 and CHO cells when both the κ- and λ-light chains are present. In summary, IgG outperformed IgM variants in expression efficacy, while light-chain selection had minimal impact on the overall expression levels. The yields of all mab variants were higher in fresh cells, despite cell cultures with a high cell passage number having higher cell densities and cell numbers at the time of harvest. The incorporation of a particular light chain occurred at similar rates in HEK293 and CHO cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Antibody Discovery and Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 682 KiB  
Article
Epidemiology, Clinical Features and Treatment of Neurosarcoidosis in Northern Spain
by Alba Herrero-Morant, Raúl Fernández-Ramón, Diana Prieto-Peña, José Luis Martín-Varillas, Santos Castañeda and Ricardo Blanco
Biomedicines 2025, 13(6), 1360; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13061360 - 1 Jun 2025
Viewed by 606
Abstract
Objectives: Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a severe and infrequent complication of sarcoidosis. Available data on NS are variable. We aimed to characterize NS epidemiology, clinical and therapeutic characteristics in a well-defined cohort of NS patients. Methods: Observational population-based cohort study of 342 patients diagnosed [...] Read more.
Objectives: Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a severe and infrequent complication of sarcoidosis. Available data on NS are variable. We aimed to characterize NS epidemiology, clinical and therapeutic characteristics in a well-defined cohort of NS patients. Methods: Observational population-based cohort study of 342 patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis in Northern Spain, between 1999 and 2019. Among them, those patients who fulfilled the Consortium Consensus Group diagnosis criteria for NS were included. The annual incidence between 1999 and 2019 was estimated by gender, age, and year of diagnosis. Additionally, a literature review was performed. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated using the neurological-related extra-pulmonary physician organ severity tool (ePOST). Results: NS was diagnosed in 29 out of 342 patients with sarcoidosis (8.5%; 18 women/11 men) with a mean age of 42.3 ± 15.1 years. Most NS patients have associated systemic sarcoidosis (93.4%) mainly consisting of lung (n = 22; 75.9%), articular (n = 15; 51.7%) and/or ocular (n = 12; 40%) involvement. The annual incidence of NS during the study period was 1.1 per 1,000,000 people. There is a linear relationship with a weak decrease in age at diagnosis over time. NS was subdivided into chronic headache (n = 11; 36.7%), cranial neuropathy (n = 7; 24.1%), myelitis (n = 4; 13.8%), peripheral neuropathy (n = 3; 10.3%), cranial neuropathy with chronic headache (n = 3; 10.3%) and aseptic meningitis (n = 2; 6.9%). Twenty-five patients (86.2%) received oral glucocorticoids (mean ± SD maximum prednisone dose 49.6 ± 19.4 mg/day). In addition, conventional immunosuppressive drugs were administered to 17 (58.6%) patients and biological therapy to 12 (41.4%) patients. After 12 months of initiating biological therapy, 14 out of 17 patients (82.4%) achieved complete remission, defined as an ePOST score of 0. Severe allergic reaction was observed in only one patient who had received treatment with both Infliximab and Adalimumab. Conclusions: The epidemiological, clinical and treatment characteristics of NS in Northern Spain are similar to that of other countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 579 KiB  
Review
Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Crohn’s Disease—A Narrative Review on Clinical Efficacy and Safety Profile
by Dawid Piecuch, Edyta Hańczyk, Szymon Kopciał, Natalia Pawelec, Weronika Mazur and Karolina Kornatowska
Pharmacy 2025, 13(3), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13030073 - 21 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1619
Abstract
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that leads to significant deterioration in patients’ quality of life. Biologic therapy, including the use of ustekinumab (UST), is a modern approach to treating the moderate to severe form of CD, [...] Read more.
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that leads to significant deterioration in patients’ quality of life. Biologic therapy, including the use of ustekinumab (UST), is a modern approach to treating the moderate to severe form of CD, especially in patients refractory to traditional treatments. UST, which acts as an interleukin IL-12 and IL-23 antagonist, has shown high efficacy in reducing inflammation, improving quality of life, and promoting mucosal regeneration and fistula healing. However, the use of biologic therapies, such as UST, has challenges related to the timing of treatment and patient response, including the problem of immunogenicity. To determine the clinical efficacy and safety profile of UST in the treatment of CD, a review of the literature published in the PubMed database over the last 5 years was conducted. After excluding articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, we analyzed 42 clinical studies. The review discusses the available data on the efficacy and safety of UST, as well as its comparison with other biologic therapies, such as infliximab and adalimumab. UST, although not significantly greater to adalimumab, has lower immunogenicity and higher treatment retention. The therapeutic value of UST is also confirmed by biosimilars such as ABP 65 and FYB202, which show comparable efficacy and safety profile. The analysis of predictive biomarkers, such as serum drug levels and baseline eosinophil levels, could be an important element in the future personalization of CD treatment. The review’s findings point to the importance of further research to improve the tailoring of therapies to individual patients and improve long-term treatment outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacy Practice and Practice-Based Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2527 KiB  
Review
Optimizing Biologic Therapy for the Prevention of Post-Operative Recurrence in Crohn’s Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
by Reem Aljabri, Saqer Al-Saraie and Ahmed Alhouti
Biomedicines 2025, 13(5), 1232; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051232 - 19 May 2025
Viewed by 1318
Abstract
Crohn’s disease (CD) imposes a substantial burden on patients due to its chronic, relapsing nature, often necessitating surgical intervention. However, surgery is not curative, and post-operative recurrence (POR) remains a major clinical challenge, with up to 80% of patients developing endoscopic recurrence within [...] Read more.
Crohn’s disease (CD) imposes a substantial burden on patients due to its chronic, relapsing nature, often necessitating surgical intervention. However, surgery is not curative, and post-operative recurrence (POR) remains a major clinical challenge, with up to 80% of patients developing endoscopic recurrence within one year if left untreated. The pathophysiology of POR is multifactorial, involving dysregulated immune responses, gut microbiota alterations, and mucosal healing impairment, highlighting the need for targeted therapeutic strategies. This review aims to explore the current landscape of POR management, focusing on biologic therapies and emerging advanced treatments. Conventional management relies on early prophylactic therapy with anti-TNF agents such as infliximab and adalimumab, which have demonstrated efficacy in reducing endoscopic and clinical recurrence. However, newer biologics, including IL-23 inhibitors (risankizumab) and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (upadacitinib), have shown promise in CD management, though their role in POR remains underexplored. The lack of direct clinical evidence for advanced biologics in POR prevention, combined with inter-individual variability in treatment response, underscores the need for further research. Future directions should focus on optimizing therapeutic strategies through personalized medicine, identifying predictive biomarkers, and conducting robust trials to establish the efficacy of novel agents in POR prevention. A tailored, evidence-driven approach is essential to improving long-term outcomes and minimizing disease recurrence in post-operative CD patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4421 KiB  
Article
Utilization, Expenditure, and Price Trends of Nonbiologic and Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in the US Medicaid Programs: An Empirical Data Analysis of over Three Decades
by Zuhair A. Alqahtani, Xiaomeng Yue and Jeff J. Guo
J. Pharm. BioTech Ind. 2025, 2(2), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpbi2020007 - 1 May 2025
Viewed by 446
Abstract
Aims: To describe and analyze trends in the utilization, spending, and average per prescription price of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the US Medicaid population. Methods: Using the publicly available national outpatient Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data, a retrospective, descriptive trend analysis was [...] Read more.
Aims: To describe and analyze trends in the utilization, spending, and average per prescription price of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the US Medicaid population. Methods: Using the publicly available national outpatient Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data, a retrospective, descriptive trend analysis was conducted on DMARDs from 1991 to 2022. Annual prescription counts and reimbursement amounts were calculated for nonbiologic and biologic DMARDs. Average per prescription price and Market share competition were calculated and analyzed for DMARDs. Results: Medicaid utilization of nonbiologic peaked in 2021 with 884,000 while biologic DMARDs with 688,000 prescriptions. In 2022, biologic utilization took the lead and exceed nonbiologic with 1.5 million prescriptions. Over the last 32 years, biologics captured 94% of Medicaid expenditures toward DMARDs, of which, 56% was toward adalimumab alone. On the other hand, spending on conventional DMARDs accounted for 33% while 67% accounted toward Janus Kinase Inhibitors. Biologic DMARDs average prices increased from around $800 to around $6000. However, the average adalimumab price increased 12-fold from around $1200 in 2003 to over $15,000 in 2021. Medicaid spending toward adalimumab increased by 179%. Conclusions: The substantial increase of DMARDs utilization and expenditure contributed significant burden to Medicaid budget. Introducing biosimilars into the market in the past few years is eroding the market share for several established biologics. Further cost-containment policies may be necessary for costly DMARD pharmacotherapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1517 KiB  
Article
Anti-Adalimumab Antibodies Purified from Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients: Kinetic Characterization Among Biosimilars
by Andrea Di Santo, Edoardo Marrani, Carmen Gallo, Fosca Errante, Valerio Maniscalco, Anna Maria Papini, Gabriele Simonini, Paolo Rovero and Feliciana Real Fernandez
Biosensors 2025, 15(5), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15050278 - 29 Apr 2025
Viewed by 2787
Abstract
The use of adalimumab biosimilars has become increasingly common in clinical practice, reflecting their growing acceptance and efficacy as therapeutic alternatives to reference biologics. However, studies investigating the molecular interactions between anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) elicited in patients and different adalimumab biosimilars remain limited. [...] Read more.
The use of adalimumab biosimilars has become increasingly common in clinical practice, reflecting their growing acceptance and efficacy as therapeutic alternatives to reference biologics. However, studies investigating the molecular interactions between anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) elicited in patients and different adalimumab biosimilars remain limited. This study aims to characterize the kinetic interactions between purified AAA from pediatric patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and three adalimumab formulations: the originator Humira®, and the biosimilars GP2017 (Hyrimoz®) and SB5 (Imraldi®). For this purpose, adalimumab formulations were immobilized on a gold chip, and purified AAA were flowed to perform further kinetic analysis using the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technology. Results showed that the KD values for purified AAA from patients treated with biosimilars GP2017 (Hyrimoz®) or SB5 (Imraldi®) were comparable across all formulations tested, including the originator Humira®. AAA interacted with Humira®, Hyrimoz®, and Imraldi® with similar apparent affinity (10−9 M > KD > 10−10 M); slight variations have been observed among patients, less among biosimilars. The similarity in KD values across biosimilars and the originator supports the notion that, at the level of immunogenicity, biosimilars can be considered clinically comparable to the originator. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 740 KiB  
Review
Cytokine-Targeting Biologic Therapies for Alopecia Areata: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanism of Action, Clinical Efficacy, and Adverse Events
by Simonetta I. Gaumond, Isabella Kamholtz and Joaquin J. Jimenez
Biologics 2025, 5(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/biologics5020011 - 9 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1778
Abstract
Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease affecting 2% of the global population, often causing localized scalp hair loss that can progress to alopecia totalis or universalis. While corticosteroids and JAK inhibitors are effective, their significant side effects highlight the need for [...] Read more.
Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune disease affecting 2% of the global population, often causing localized scalp hair loss that can progress to alopecia totalis or universalis. While corticosteroids and JAK inhibitors are effective, their significant side effects highlight the need for safer, more targeted treatments. Recently, biologics have gained attention as potential treatments for AA. Methods: A review of clinical trials, case series, and case reports published on PubMed was conducted to assess the efficacy of cytokine-targeting biologics for the treatment of AA. Data on the mechanism of action, treatment outcomes, and safety were extracted and analyzed. Results: Cytokine-targeting biologics identified included Dupilumab, Secukinumab, Tralokinumab, Etanercept, Ustekinumab, Infliximab, Adalimumab, and Tildrakizumab. Dupilumab and ustekinumab demonstrated strong efficacy, with dupilumab showing significant regrowth in 89% of cases and ustekinumab in all patients. Tralokinumab demonstrated a 33.75% improvement, with no patients achieving SALT50. Limited efficacy was observed with secukinumab, tildrakizumab, and adalimumab, with 71.4%, 77.8%, and 50% of patients, respectively, showing no response. Disease worsening was observed in patients who received etanercept (29%) and infliximab (50%). Conclusions: Further research is necessary to optimize treatment protocols, identify predictive biomarkers, and, crucially, discover novel and more effective cytokine targets to advance biologics as a cornerstone therapy for AA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 409 KiB  
Article
Clinical Characteristics, MRI Findings, Disease Progression, and Management of Neuro-Behçet’s Disease: A Retrospective Study in Lebanon
by Nadia Chamoun, Martine Elbejjani, Nabil K. El Ayoubi, Taha Hatab, Dana Hazimeh, Michael Ibrahim and Mira Merashli
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(8), 2543; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082543 - 8 Apr 2025
Viewed by 777
Abstract
Background: Behçet’s Disease (BD) is a complex vasculitis affecting multiple organ systems, with Neuro-Behçet’s Disease (NBD) representing a rare yet severe manifestation. Data on NBD are limited, particularly in Middle Eastern populations. Methods: This retrospective observational study, spanning from 2000 to [...] Read more.
Background: Behçet’s Disease (BD) is a complex vasculitis affecting multiple organ systems, with Neuro-Behçet’s Disease (NBD) representing a rare yet severe manifestation. Data on NBD are limited, particularly in Middle Eastern populations. Methods: This retrospective observational study, spanning from 2000 to 2021, involved 262 BD patients at a tertiary medical center in Lebanon. NBD was diagnosed based on International Consensus Recommendation diagnostic criteria. Clinical data, including demographics, manifestations, inflammatory blood markers, genetics, and treatments, were collected. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to assess disease severity. Results: Among the cohort, 27 (10.3%) had NBD, with headaches, weakness, and dizziness as the most common presenting symptoms. The prevalence of NBD was similar across genders, which differs from some regional studies. HLA-B51 positivity was found in 50 out of 60 (83.3%) tested BD patients. Parenchymal NBD cases exhibited greater disease severity than non-parenchymal cases, with female patients experiencing a more severe course compared to males. Elevated inflammatory markers (CRP and ESR) were more common in patients with severe NBD. Corticosteroids and colchicine were the most commonly used therapies overall, while patients with better disease severity were more frequently prescribed methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, adalimumab, and rituximab. An analysis of disease progression showed that at presentation, 57.1% (n = 12) of NBD patients had mild to moderate disability, which increased to 76.2% (n = 16) at the last follow-up, including 10 patients who showed an improvement in their mRS score. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence and clinical characteristics of NBD in a Middle Eastern population. These findings enhance our understanding of NBD in the Middle East, highlighting the need for further research to improve diagnosis and management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop