New Findings in Animal Biosecurity Related to Viral Diseases

A special issue of Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915). This special issue belongs to the section "Animal Viruses".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 October 2026 | Viewed by 2301

Special Issue Editors

*
E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals & Health (FARAH) Center, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
Interests: infectious diseases; vector-borne diseases; zoonoses; epidemiology; risk analysis; biosecurity
* Member of the Council of the World Animal Biosecurity Association
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
*
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada
Interests: biosecurity and contagious diseases in swine and poultry
* President of the World Animal Biosecurity Association

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

There are several definitions of animal biosecurity, but the most popular is the one that conceptualizes the 5Bios rule (bio-exclusion, bio-containment, bio-compartmentation, bio-prevention, and bio-preservation). Within this definition, animal biosecurity encompasses all measures taken to (1) limit the risk of introducing pathogens (bio-exclusion); (2) limit the spread of pathogens within the same facility (bio-compartmentation); (3) limit the spread of pathogens outside the facility (inter-herd transmission) (bio-containment); (4) prevent the risk of human contamination by pathogens (bio-prevention); and (5) prevent environmental bio-contamination and the persistence of pathogens (bio-preservation). The benefits of implementing more biosecurity measures on a farm are improved animal productivity and farm health status in terms of disease, and a decrease in economic losses. For example, the implementation of biosecurity and its effective monitoring can prevent losses resulting from African swine fever and was shown in one study to have a benefit–cost ratio of 29. The public can also encourage government engagement and strengthen national and regional efforts to increase biosecurity capacity. When it comes to viral diseases, biosecurity is a core component of any control strategy, e.g., farm biosecurity measures to limit avian influenza virus circulation on commercial chicken farms, to minimize risk factors for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus infection on duck farms, to minimize risk factors for Hepatitis E virus serological status on pig farms, and to prevent the introduction of foot-and-mouth virus and mitigate its spread if an outbreak occurs, and the identification of national biosecurity measures to increase African swine fever preparedness.

Animal biosecurity, which is key to minimizing the risk of viral animal diseases that harm human society, is increasing in importance and has been implemented for several years in veterinary medicine curricula as well as in European Animal Health Law. A new chapter of the Terrestrial Animal Health Code on biosecurity is currently being prepared by the World Organisation for Animal Health, and the World Animal Biosecurity Association (WABA) will be officially registered as an international association this year. The objectives of this Special Issue are as follows: (i) understanding what animal biosecurity is and why it is important for dealing with viral diseases; (ii) estimating and/or understanding the needs and expectations of farmers, animal onwners, veterinary practitioners, and governmental and non-governemantal organizations regarding animal biosecurity; (iii) estimating the costs and benefits of adopting animal biosecurity measures on a farm/facility; (iv) evaluating the level of protection afforded to a farm/facility using adapted and innovative methodologies and tools for different species; (v) determining the necessary changes in behaviour of farmers, onwners, veterinary practitioners, and governmental and non-governemantal organizations regarding animal biosecurity in order to significantly reduce the incidence of important viral diseases in major animal productions; and (vi) establishing the most effective way to communicate/dissiminate animal biosecurity information to farmers, owners, and veterinary practitioners. Review papers—including scopping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses—as well as original papers on the above topics that contribute to the objectives of this Special Issue are welcome.

Prof. Dr. Claude Saegerman
Prof. Dr. Jean-Pierre Vaillancourt
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Viruses is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • viruses
  • animal
  • biosecurity
  • evaluation
  • communication
  • needs
  • cost–benefit analysis
  • behaviour change

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 2364 KB  
Article
Testing Control Strategies for Foot-and-Mouth Disease in New England Using the InterSpread Plus Model: Impacts of Regional Zoning, Early Detection, and Enhanced Biosecurity
by Johnbosco U. Osuagwu, Julia M. Smith and Scott C. Merrill
Viruses 2026, 18(4), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/v18040480 - 21 Apr 2026
Viewed by 571
Abstract
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) poses a significant threat to the United States dairy industry. This study evaluates the effectiveness of regional zoning, enhanced detection, and biosecurity in controlling FMD spread, focusing on the New England milkshed, using the InterSpread Plus (ISP+) model. We adapted [...] Read more.
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) poses a significant threat to the United States dairy industry. This study evaluates the effectiveness of regional zoning, enhanced detection, and biosecurity in controlling FMD spread, focusing on the New England milkshed, using the InterSpread Plus (ISP+) model. We adapted a baseline ISP+ configuration incorporating United States dairy farm data, movement networks, cattle dealers, markets, and slaughterhouses, with milk processing plants as a model addition. Four hypotheses were tested to understand the impact of different biosecurity strategies: (H1) regional zoning limits the interregional spread of FMD post-detection; (H2) earlier detection in New England via increased passive surveillance reduces the overall outbreak impact; (H3) reduced indirect transmission through enhanced biosecurity measures improves FMD outbreak control; (H4) the combination of regional zoning and earlier detection provides synergistic reduction in FMD impact beyond either strategy alone. The four hypotheses were tested using three geographically distinct infection seed sets; 100 iterations of each scenario were simulated over 210 days and compared to the baseline. Key impact metrics included the daily number of infected premises, the outbreak duration, and the total number of infected premises across the outbreak scenarios. Results suggest shorter outbreak durations and reduced total infected premises under the hypothesized scenarios, compared to the baseline scenario. Kruskal–Wallis H tests confirmed significant differences across the baseline, regional zoning, early detection, enhanced biosecurity, and the combination of heightened passive surveillance with regional zoning scenarios in terms of total infected premises. Post hoc Dunn’s tests indicated that enhanced biosecurity outperformed other control strategies tested. These findings demonstrate that layered interventions may substantially curtail both the national amplification and local spread of FMD, and thus protect the consumer milk supply and reduce cascading economic shocks from an outbreak. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Findings in Animal Biosecurity Related to Viral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1468 KB  
Article
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Biosecurity Practices Regarding African Swine Fever Among Small-Scale Pig Farmers in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Cambodia
by Véronique Renault, Ariane Masson, Paeng Xaphokame, Outhen Phommasack, Borin Sear, Samnang Ven and Claude Saegerman
Viruses 2026, 18(1), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/v18010034 - 24 Dec 2025
Viewed by 1114
Abstract
African swine fever (ASF) is a transboundary viral disease that has heavily impacted Southeast Asia since its introduction in 2019. Smallholder pig production systems in Cambodia and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (the Lao PDR), characterized by low biosecurity, free-ranging practices, and limited [...] Read more.
African swine fever (ASF) is a transboundary viral disease that has heavily impacted Southeast Asia since its introduction in 2019. Smallholder pig production systems in Cambodia and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (the Lao PDR), characterized by low biosecurity, free-ranging practices, and limited veterinary oversight, remain particularly vulnerable. To assess farmers’ awareness and practices regarding ASF, a knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) survey was implemented between March and September 2023 by Agronomes et Vétérinaires Sans Frontières within the framework of the Biosecurity in Pig Farming (BIG) project. A total of 471 pig farmers, including 56% women, were interviewed across eight provinces using a standardized questionnaire (188 in Cambodia and 283 in the Lao PDR). Results showed that ASF awareness was generally high (92% in Cambodia, 66% in the Lao PDR), yet 15% of Cambodian and 30% of Lao respondents expressed doubts about the presence of ASF in their country. While recognition of ASF symptoms was moderate and positively correlated with farmers’ perceived capacity to identify the disease, knowledge of transmission pathways was low and often misaligned with perceptions. Airborne transmission was frequently cited as a risk, and the risks related to visitors and fomites were underestimated by more than 50% of the farmers. Implementation of biosecurity measures (BSM) was limited, with mean scores of 43% in Cambodia and 27% in the Lao PDR. Risky practices such as swill feeding, free-ranging, sharing of boars, traders, and inadequate carcass disposal remained widespread. Statistical analysis identified education level, herd size, knowledge, perceived risks, and perceived benefits of BSM as the main determinants of biosecurity implementation. Farmers with larger herds or stronger commercial orientation demonstrated higher biosecurity adoption, while misconceptions and knowledge gaps remained frequent among smallholder farmers. Strengthening awareness, promoting low-cost and feasible biosecurity practices, and integrating farmer-centred approaches are essential for reducing ASF transmission risks and improving the resilience of smallholder pig production systems in the region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Findings in Animal Biosecurity Related to Viral Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop