sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Digital Technologies Enabling Sustainability in Manufacturing and Supply Chain

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2023) | Viewed by 6837

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
Interests: industrial engineering; supply chains; manufacturing; Industry 4.0; sustainability

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Developing sustainable supply chains represents one of today’s main global challenges. The increasing pressure on companies to meet environmental and social targets while ensuring the financial sustainability of the business represents a complex decision-making problem. Several environmental factors such as energy consumption, carbon footprints, emissions, waste of natural resources and water consumption have to be minimised while providing welfare for society.

Moreover, the recent shortage of items at retail stores or components in the automotive manufacturing sector during the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the fragility of supply chains and the need for re-thinking how products and services are provided to customers throughout their entire life cycle.

On the other hand, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, known as Industry 4.0, is pushing companies to digitalise their processes throughout the entire supply chain for improving data exchange, visibility of information, cyber security and overall performance. The development of technologies such as blockchains, cloud computing, virtual reality and advanced robotics is accelerating the transformation of the supply chain including sourcing, manufacturing and logistics operations. 

The aims of this Special Issue are to investigate what is the impact of digital technologies on sustainable production, how they are implemented for the various operations at the different stages in the supply chain and how they help companies in improving their economic, environmental and social performance.

We welcome articles using both qualitative and quantitative research methods, including, but not limited to, the following:

Multi-criteria decision-making analysis;

Multi-objective optimisation;

Machine learning techniques;

Simulation models;

Fuzzy logic;

Quantitative surveys;

Interviews;

Case studies.

Keywords

  • digital technologies
  • Industry 4.0
  • sustainability
  • triple bottom line
  • supply chain management

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 1133 KiB  
Article
Nexuses among Green Supply Chain Management, Green Human Capital, Managerial Environmental Knowledge, and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Developing Country
by Naila Nureen, Da Liu, Muhammad Irfan, Maida Malik and Usama Awan
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5597; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065597 - 22 Mar 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2263
Abstract
The growing pressures from the government, buyers, consumers, suppliers, and the general public have recently compelled manufacturing firms to enhance their production methods by becoming more environmentally friendly and pursuing new innovative methods for producing green goods in developing countries. However, the relationship [...] Read more.
The growing pressures from the government, buyers, consumers, suppliers, and the general public have recently compelled manufacturing firms to enhance their production methods by becoming more environmentally friendly and pursuing new innovative methods for producing green goods in developing countries. However, the relationship between green supply chain management (GSCM), green human capital (GHC), green innovation (GIN), managerial environmental knowledge (MEK), and firm performance (FPR) has received only a minimal amount of research focus. This study addresses this research gap by providing empirical evidence to motivate firms to implement GSCM, GHC, GIN, and MEK to enhance their FPR in developing countries substantially. A conceptual framework was developed to connect the concepts mentioned above. A questionnaire-based survey was used to collect the data. A total of 736 respondents from manufacturing firms in China were selected. Utilizing structural equation modeling (SEM), the data were analyzed. The findings indicate that neither GHC nor GSCM directly affects FPR; rather, GIN mediates the connection between GHC, GSCM, and FPR. In addition, the findings showed that MEK directly affects FPR and moderates the link between GIN and FPR. This study examined several theoretical and managerial implications and expanded research in the related fields. The results may help practitioners and managers comprehend how GSCM practices impact GIN and FPR. The outcomes of this research will benefit experts, policy makers, and stakeholders who seek to encourage FPR enhancements. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1664 KiB  
Article
Supply Chain Finance and Blockchain in Operations Management: A Literature Review
by Yu Gong, Yun Zhang and Mohammed Alharithi
Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13450; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013450 - 18 Oct 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3886
Abstract
The emerging blockchain technology is believed to be a disruptive innovation in the fields of both supply chain management and financial management. Yet, little is known on the interaction of the two domains. In this paper, we conducted a thematic literature review in [...] Read more.
The emerging blockchain technology is believed to be a disruptive innovation in the fields of both supply chain management and financial management. Yet, little is known on the interaction of the two domains. In this paper, we conducted a thematic literature review in the novel field of blockchain and supply chain finance (SCF), which is based on 52 papers published from 2017 to 2021 in academic journals, proceedings and books. Based on thematic analysis, the current status of this field is concluded and presented in this research, including the challenges in traditional SCF, factors influencing blockchain adoption in SCF, blockchain-based SCF solutions, and the blockchain adoption mechanism and system design in SCF. Furthermore, a conceptual framework of blockchain adoption in SCF is developed, which combines the emerged themes. Finally, three future research directions are proposed for further research, including cost optimization of blockchain adoption in SCF, risk management of blockchain operations in SCF, and blockchain and sustainable SCF. This research presents a timely and useful summary on existing research and points out the future research directions on blockchain and SCF. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop