sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Competition and Cooperation in Sustainable Business

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2022) | Viewed by 6965

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35017 Las Palmas, Spain
Interests: entrepreneurship; tourism; coopetition; local development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Management and Accounting, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, 58429-900 Paraíba, Brazil
Interests: coopetition; competitiveness; strategic management; tourism; sustainability

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Cooperating and competing, two human activities in pursuit of the same goal: to position oneself better in a context. Companies actively use one or both strategies to improve their position in an increasingly complex competitive environment. With these strategies, companies seek better visibility, lower costs, advantageous access to resources, complementarity in providing services to their customers or access to complex technologies, to cite just a few examples. However, the real challenge is, undoubtedly, to cooperate with competitors, generating a hybrid behaviour that is particularly useful for the development of sustainable business in any of its dimensions. Thus, coopetition has become the norm in contexts that suffer from difficult access to resources, customers or visibility of their businesses, but also in multi-level environments where all actors are immersed in intricate business relationships such as industrial districts, technology parks, tourist destinations and shopping centres/districts, to cite the most common ones.

From a purely academic perspective, there is a tendency to understand coopetition as an extension of the competition or cooperation theories; however, coopetition is a new and promising field of study. In fact, coopetition should be considered a subfield of strategy, a concept capable of explaining market relations, cluster dynamics, organisational networks, business alliances, social entrepreneurship or the collaborative economy, among others. However, coopetition has also become a strategy to achieve a sustainable context seeking a better balance between all actors involved, minimising the negative effects of competition and, at the same time, maximising the positive effects of cooperation. Many scholars have also been able to demonstrate that coopetition helps to improve innovation performance, internationalisation, tourism development, the creation of P&D projects, knowledge sharing, partnership commitments, teamwork efficiency or risk minimisation, just to refer to the most recent studies.

However, despite its ability to aid the understanding of competitive relationships in different sectors and contexts, there are still theoretical and managerial gaps to be explored concerning this interesting strategy, many of them related to sustainability issues: How can coopetition help to consolidate the innovation model of the Quintuple Helix, in which interactions between academia, industry, government, culture and the environment take place? How can this strategy add value to the Sustainable Development Goals set by the United Nations? Is coopetition the foundational behaviour of smart contexts, such as smart contracts in digital environments, smart cities and smart tourism destinations?

Another important question is to rethink the theories and analysis of clusters from the perspective of coopetition to provide more sustainable local development: Can social entrepreneurship incubators function as real centres for generating coopetitive relationships for better results? Is the circular economy a useful framework for developing coopetitive strategies?

These, and many other aspects of coopetition, are welcome topics for this Special Issue, in which we look at how cooperation and competition are crystallising into a hybrid behaviour to provide sustainable gains and competitive advantages to their promoters and the environment in which they operate. This Special Issue aims to broaden the cycle of coopetition, known as the cocreation and appropriation of value, to include the concept of value return, answering the question how coopetition helps social and economic development. The context is broad and challenging. Work in diverse contexts and organisations can enrich our progress in the study of coopetition. Cases illustrating the capacity of human organisations to implement this strategy are also welcome; after all, we all cooperate and compete at some point. We are confident that this Special Issue will illustrate that we are, in essence, coopetitive by nature.

Prof. Dr. Rosa M. Batista-Canino
Prof. Dr. Adriana F. Chim-Miki
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • coopetition
  • cooperation
  • competition
  • sustainability
  • strategic management

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 2361 KiB  
Article
Decision-Making and Coordination of Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain with PIR under the Different Government Subsidy Strategies
by Jun Yao, Dongyan Chen and Hui Yu
Sustainability 2022, 14(23), 16122; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316122 - 2 Dec 2022
Viewed by 1048
Abstract
Government subsidies and process innovation for remanufacturing (PIR) have become effective measures to improve the recycling and remanufacturing efficiency of waste products and promote sustainable economic development. Under different government subsidy strategies, the PIR decision and coordination of the closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) [...] Read more.
Government subsidies and process innovation for remanufacturing (PIR) have become effective measures to improve the recycling and remanufacturing efficiency of waste products and promote sustainable economic development. Under different government subsidy strategies, the PIR decision and coordination of the closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) of authorized competition remanufacturing are studied. This paper constructs five centralized and decentralized decision models of CLSC and analyzes the influence of government subsidy strategy and PIR input entity differences on the competition and cooperation relationship between manufacturers and remanufacturers and the performance of CLSC. A fixed license fee contract is designed to realize CLSC coordination and to improve the performance and operational efficiency of the CLSC. It is found that patent licensing fees can always play a role in sharing government subsidies between the manufacturer and remanufacturer, and making changes in government subsidy strategies only affects formulation of patent licensing fees. Manufacturer PIR input mode is more conducive to improving the market demand for new products, while remanufacturer PIR input mode is more conducive to improving the PIR input level, remanufactured product market demand, CLSC members and overall performance. Moreover, government subsidies can produce better efficiency and effects under remanufacturer PIR input mode. A fixed license fee contract can coordinate a CLSC effectively. The increase in government subsidies and PIR input effect can effectively expand the negotiation space between the manufacturer and remanufacturer, which is conducive to achievement of coordination contracts. Finally, the main conclusions are verified by numerical analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Competition and Cooperation in Sustainable Business)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 307 KiB  
Article
What Skills for Multi-Partner Open Innovation Projects? Open Innovation Competence Profile in a Cluster Ecosystem Context
by Marita McPhillips, Tatjana Nikitina, Silke Tegtmeier and Michał Wójcik
Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13330; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013330 - 17 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1474
Abstract
Industry 4.0 and the turbulent environment have rendered increasing interest in open innovation that extends from the bilateral transmission of expertise to multilateral platform collaborations. Open innovation ventures are seen as intricate collaborations that require the commitment of numerous partners during the lifetime [...] Read more.
Industry 4.0 and the turbulent environment have rendered increasing interest in open innovation that extends from the bilateral transmission of expertise to multilateral platform collaborations. Open innovation ventures are seen as intricate collaborations that require the commitment of numerous partners during the lifetime of the project. In order to examine the specific competence of open innovation teams, we set the research question as follows: What individual competencies facilitate the exchange of knowledge in open innovation projects? We explored the theoretical framework of open innovation and collected information from a nation-wide, cross-industrial set of OI projects from three high-performing clusters, facilitating a total of 102 OI projects to identify open innovation competence dimensions, thus creating a novel profile. The outcomes showed that competencies facilitate the exchange of knowledge in open innovation ventures in distinct ways. Our findings showed that open innovation competence can be captured using a profile with the dimensions of creativity, entrepreneurship, communication and networking, open-minded thinking, risk-taking, and self-efficacy in digital skills. These dimensions of the open innovation competence profile are necessary for cluster project set-up. This analysis demonstrated that components of the open innovation competence profile could be paramount in understanding the underlying factors in the success of collaborative innovation projects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Competition and Cooperation in Sustainable Business)
16 pages, 979 KiB  
Article
The Role of Supervisory Board Heterogeneity on Corporate Irregularity: New Insights and Management Opportunities
by Yang Chen and Jian Xu
Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13003; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013003 - 11 Oct 2022
Viewed by 1017
Abstract
By structural equation modeling (SEM), this paper analyzes and explores the four Potential Characteristics of the supervisory board. They are: Individual Heterogeneity of the Supervisory Member (Internal Heterogeneity), Organization Size of the Supervisory Board (Organization Size), Structural Characteristics of the Supervisory Board (Structural [...] Read more.
By structural equation modeling (SEM), this paper analyzes and explores the four Potential Characteristics of the supervisory board. They are: Individual Heterogeneity of the Supervisory Member (Internal Heterogeneity), Organization Size of the Supervisory Board (Organization Size), Structural Characteristics of the Supervisory Board (Structural Characteristics) and Identity Background of the Supervisory Board (Identity Background). Then, it constructs a path analysis and theoretical model of the influence of supervisory board heterogeneity on corporate irregularities, and verifies each influencing factor and observation index. The results show that individual factor Professional heterogeneity is the most effective indicator of Internal Heterogeneity, but such Internal Heterogeneity has a very limited effect on the occurrence of corporate irregularities. Organization Size has a significant impact on corporate misbehavior, and Number of people is an important factor in constructing Organization Size, yet the frequency of staff Turnover is not significant. Although the Average Age, Party Member Ratio, and Female Ratio can well conceptualize the Structural Characteristics, their effects on supervision performance are not obvious. Identity Background, including factors such as Average Education, Government/University Experience, or External Supervisors, does not improve supervisory performance and reduce the occurrence of irregularities. The above findings provide a foundation for further analysis and integration of multiple heterogeneous factors, as well as further study of the “combined effectiveness” of the supervisory board, and deeper investigation of the actual impact of the supervisory board on irregularities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Competition and Cooperation in Sustainable Business)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 326 KiB  
Article
The Efficiency of Indonesian Commercial Banks: Does the Banking Industry Competition Matter?
by Sajida Sari, Shochrul Rohmatul Ajija, Wasiaturrahma Wasiaturrahma and Raja Adzrin Raja Ahmad
Sustainability 2022, 14(17), 10995; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710995 - 2 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2756
Abstract
This study examines the effect of banking industry competition on the efficiency of commercial banks in Indonesia from 2010 to 2019. First, using data envelopment analysis (DEA), the results showed that the commercial banks in Indonesia are moderately efficient. Second, this study uses [...] Read more.
This study examines the effect of banking industry competition on the efficiency of commercial banks in Indonesia from 2010 to 2019. First, using data envelopment analysis (DEA), the results showed that the commercial banks in Indonesia are moderately efficient. Second, this study uses H-statistics, obtained through the Panzar–Rosse model, to measure the level of competition. The results showed that the banking industry competition in Indonesia is a monopolistic market. In addition, this study also analysed other factors affecting bank efficiency, namely non-performing loans (NPL), loan to deposit ratio (LDR), capital adequacy ratio (CAR), bank size, and economic growth. This study used the Tobit estimation method to analyse the effect of competition and other variables. The results showed that tighter competition in the banking industry reduces the commercial banks’ efficiency. The results of this study support the competition-inefficiency hypothesis. Other variables such as CAR, LDR, and economic growth had a significant effect on bank efficiency. Meanwhile, the NPL variable and bank size had no significant effect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Competition and Cooperation in Sustainable Business)
Back to TopTop