sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Buildings Adapted

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Tourism, Culture, and Heritage".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 April 2019) | Viewed by 10357

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of the Built Environment, Technical University Eindhoven (TU/e), 5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands

E-Mail Website
Assistant Guest Editor
Faculty of the Built Environment, Technical University Eindhoven (TU/e), 5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This issue of Sustainability is meant to collect relevant case studies that describe the fundamental adaptation of the physical shape of buildings in (post- and late-modern) times.

The built environment is subject to continuous change, driven by quickly shifting needs in terms of function and performance. Nevertheless, architecture is a profession that suggests permanence, almost inevitably, because it is guided by voluminous financial investments and is realised in concrete and stone. It does not automatically accommodate the flexibility that is required nowadays. Academically, the discipline of architecture distinguishes between typology, morphology and style to describe the basic entities that define a building. Typology refers to the basic categories of composition to distinguish between functional groups (e.g. housing, offices, factories, hospitals). Morphology refers to the formal arrangements of the shapes of buildings, both individually and in their mutual relation in a (urban) context. Style refers to the aesthetic and cultural conventions that guide the design of the shapes.

Until post- or late-modern times the adaptation of the building stock was often met by creating new buildings, at the cost of demolishing old ones. Such had certainly been the habit during most of the heydays of modernity, when the new was evidently preferred above the old. However, in recent years, the popular preference has shifted to maintaining existing structures and transforming them instead. This shift may have been generated by a growing general interest in issues of sustainability in general and in heritage in particular. This trend is highly relevant for the academic and professional fields of architecture. More than ever, architecture (at least in the Western world) is expected to search a basis in existing qualities, rather than introducing something completely new.

This is why this issue of Sustainability draws the attention to the consequences of the current trend of adaptation for the built environment. To limit the field of exploration we ask for recent (> 2000) case studies of built artefacts in transformation. Transformations can range from retrofit to rehabilitation.

The special issue encourages submissions that explore the trends that have caused the impulse for a transformation project, influencing the typological, morphological and/or stylistic coherence of the building under review. Moreover, submissions exploring the (design) approach that has been followed to create a successful result are encouraged. We do ask for case studies that show the mobilisation of a clear design strategy in order to alter an ineffective spatial composition into an artefact that is improved, without losing its architectural coherence. In contrast with that, we also ask for case studies of transformation projects that must be considered a failure; the academic exploration of architecture is not only served by successes.

We invite for contributions that describe vividly a case study and we encourage the incorporation of mixed-methods in the evaluation of the transformation (e.g. mapping, interviews, graphical analysis, drawing, re-drawing). We’re most interested in cases that have general relevance, for example, because the reviewed building is representative for many others or because the transformation process and the design approach involved can be considered exemplary.

Prof. Dr. Bernard Colenbrander
Ms. Lisanne Havinga
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • transformation
  • design strategies
  • retrofit
  • rehabilitation

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

31 pages, 6040 KiB  
Article
Adaptive Reuse of Apartments as Heritage Assets in the Seoul Station Urban Regeneration Area
by Jungwon Yoon and Jihye Lee
Sustainability 2019, 11(11), 3124; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113124 - 03 Jun 2019
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 6774
Abstract
Apartments were crucial solutions to provide sufficient dwellings and to improve residential environment quality in the period after the Korean War. Thirty years after the first rush of apartment construction, many of those apartments have been demolished. However, several small-scale apartment complexes or [...] Read more.
Apartments were crucial solutions to provide sufficient dwellings and to improve residential environment quality in the period after the Korean War. Thirty years after the first rush of apartment construction, many of those apartments have been demolished. However, several small-scale apartment complexes or single-building apartments without collective estates were not included in reconstruction efforts due to property, ownership, and reconstruction feasibility issues. Four such apartments remain in the Seoul Station Urban Regeneration Area. Although they are considered severely deteriorated, their architectural, historical, and cultural heritage values warrant inclusion in the Seoul Future Heritage list. From the perspective of urban regeneration, these apartments should be targeted for revitalization not only to preserve their originality but to improve the quality of sustainable building conditions and operations. In this study, we examine Choongjeong Apartment, Hoehyeon Civic Apartment, St.Joseph Apartment, and Seosomun Apartment in terms of balance among six heritage values and their improvement needs, as well as possible revitalization strategies that support sustainable urban regeneration in the area. We argue that their physical conditions can be brought up to applicable building codes, if financial support is forthcoming and numerous decision-makers allow. However, sustainable revitalization of apartments requires examination of factors affecting adaptive reuse. Through a literature and data collection review within an analysis framework, we analyze factors and issues for adaptive reuse of the four apartments. It is expected that the findings of this paper will provide insight into the role of various actors determining and taking actions for strategic physical interventions and change of uses. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Buildings Adapted)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 5048 KiB  
Article
Progress and Stagnation of Renovation, Energy Efficiency, and Gentrification of Pre-War Walk-Up Apartment Buildings in Amsterdam Since 1995
by Leo Oorschot and Wessel De Jonge
Sustainability 2019, 11(9), 2590; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092590 - 05 May 2019
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3276
Abstract
Increasing the energy efficiency of the housing stock has been one of the largest challenges of the built environment in the Netherlands in recent decades. Parallel with the energy transition there is an ongoing revaluation of the architectural quality of pre-war residential buildings. [...] Read more.
Increasing the energy efficiency of the housing stock has been one of the largest challenges of the built environment in the Netherlands in recent decades. Parallel with the energy transition there is an ongoing revaluation of the architectural quality of pre-war residential buildings. In the past, urban renewal was traditionally based on demolition and replacement with new buildings. This has changed to the improvement of old buildings through renovation. Housing corporations developed an approach for the deep renovation of their housing stock in the period 1995–2015. The motivation to renovate buildings varied, but the joint pattern that emerged was quality improvement of housing in cities, focusing particularly on energy efficiency, according to project data files from the NRP institute (Platform voor Transformatie en Renovatie). However, since 2015 the data from the federation of Amsterdam-based housing associations AFWC (Amsterdamse Federatie Woningcorporaties) has shown the transformation of pre-war walk-up apartment buildings has stagnated. The sales of units are slowing down, except in pre-war neighbourhoods. Housing associations have sold their affordable housing stock of pre-war property in Amsterdam inside the city’s ring road. The sales revenue was used to build new affordable housing far beyond the ring road. This study highlights the profound influence of increasing requirements established by the European Energy Performance of Building Directive (EPBD) and the revised Housing Act of 1 July 2015, for the renovation of the pre-war housing stock. The transformation process to climate-neutral neighbourhoods inside the ring road is slowing down because of new property owners, making a collective heat network difficult to realize; furthermore, segregation of residents is appearing in Amsterdam. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Buildings Adapted)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop