sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Integrated Pest Management and Risk Assessment of Biopesticides

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (16 September 2024) | Viewed by 1742

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Plant Protection, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Madrid, Spain
Interests: plant pathology; fungal diseases; brown rot; biocontrol
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Synthetic pesticides constitute an integral part of modern agriculture. Regardless, there are growing concerns about their frequent detection in natural resources, which, based on their acknowledged undesirable off-target effects, constitute a major risk for the environment and human health.

Currently, plant protection products are based predominantly on the use of chemical synthesised pesticides. However, concerns still remain about the impact of chemical pesticides on human and animal health and the environment. Controlling pests that damage crops and plants is necessary both to safeguard food security and to ensure viable income to farmers for their production. This needs to be achieved while minimising risks to people and the environment. Such an approach, using natural methods whenever possible and chemical pesticides as a last resort, is in line with the definition of ‘integrated pest management’ from the International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management, which emphasises the growth of a healthy crop with the least possible disruption to agroecosystems and encourages natural pest control mechanisms.

The development of alternative active substances for the control of crop pests and their implementation in Integrated Pest Management strategies have been encouraged to address these concerns. Biological pest control agents can contribute to the development of new integrate pest control strategies, as they generally pose little health or environment risk and can have good compatibility with many beneficial invertebrates used in integrated pest control methods.

Biological products, including microbial pesticides, plant extracts, and semiochemicals such as pheromones or allelochemicals, are gaining ground as new solutions for the substitution of synthetic pesticides. In addition, new microbial solutions (phages, protists, microbial consortia) and ds-RNA pesticides are emerging; biological solutions and low-risk products are expected to reach the market in the coming years. Despite ongoing global efforts by the OECD, European Union, and FAO to address the regulatory constraints, we are still lacking a concrete risk assessment scheme relevant to these biological solutions.

Ecosystems are important for regulating pests and vector-borne diseases that attack plants, though the activities of predators and parasites, such as birds, bats, flies, wasps, frogs, and fungi, all act as natural controls. There is need to assess the ecosystem impacts associated with the release of any of these low-risk biopesticides and develop specific methods of determining their possible non-target effects. Adequate monitoring and the use of molecular techniques to identify and follow the movement of biological products are needed to examine and mitigate the potential negative biological impacts. 

Dr. Belen Guijarro
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • microbial pest control agent
  • biopesticide
  • microbial consortia
  • microbiome
  • microbiome modulation
  • ds-RNA pesticides
  • risk management
  • risk assessment
  • low-risk pesticide
  • secondary metabolite of concern
  • antimicrobial resistance organic production
  • integrated pest management
  • ecosystem services
  • greenhouse gas emission

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 1770 KiB  
Article
The Management of Fungal Diseases in Organic Production Systems Through a Mixture of Durum Wheat Varieties
by Wissal Bozalmat, Si Bennasseur Alaoui, Abdel Aziz Hassane Sidikou and Aziz Abouabdillah
Sustainability 2024, 16(21), 9304; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219304 - 26 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1161
Abstract
Fungal diseases are a yield-limiting factor for wheat. Their management in organic production systems is one of the prevailing challenges because it must be based mainly on indirect measures through agricultural practices. Variety mixtures are one of these practices, a concept that has [...] Read more.
Fungal diseases are a yield-limiting factor for wheat. Their management in organic production systems is one of the prevailing challenges because it must be based mainly on indirect measures through agricultural practices. Variety mixtures are one of these practices, a concept that has been demonstrated to improve several factors affecting yield. Recently, it has become a practice that enables sustainability in agriculture. Our research aim is to evaluate the capacity of this practice to control three fungal diseases (foliar and ear) on durum wheat. This study was conducted over two consecutive years (2019 and 2020) at two locations: a certified organic farm in the Benslimane region (2019) and the National School of Agriculture farm in Meknes (2020). Four durum wheat varieties (Isly, Tarek, Karim, and Nassira) were used to create the mixture. The parameters that were monitored were the disease severity, the grain yield, and its components. The analysis of variance for the three fungal diseases’ severity was significant. The variety that showed resistance to all diseases was the Isly variety, and the most susceptible variety was the Nassira variety. The resistance of the other varieties to the diseases was variable from one year to the other. The mixture showed average severity values. It allowed a reduction in the severity of leaf rust of 47% during the first year and 30% during the second year compared to the most susceptible variety (Nassira). In the case of HLB (helminthosporiosis leaf blight), it reduced the disease by 47% during the first year and 34% during the 2020 season. For ear disease, Fusarium head blight (FHB), the reduction was 68% during the year 2019 and 49% during 2020. The mixture also ensured yield stability between the two trial years (1.66 t ha−1 and 1.54 t ha−1). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Pest Management and Risk Assessment of Biopesticides)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop